OPINIONOnce upon a time in WashingtonBy Arthur SolomonThe political louts are at it again,slashing and trashing each other.And as Election Day draws closer,it’ll <strong>pr</strong>obably get much worse. But it’sappallingly bad now.An ill-mannered Congressman kickedoff the year by callingPresident BarackObama a liar duringthe State of theArthur Solomon is aformer Senior VP forBurson-Marsteller.Union address.Texas Rep. RandyNeugebauer yelled"baby killer" whenfellow Rep. BartStupak was speakingduring the healthcaredebate; Nancy Pelosiwas engulfed bytorches on thePR News BriefsPUBLICIS ADDS U.K. SHOPPublicis Groupe has acquired eight-yearoldLondon-based healthcare firm ResoluteCommuncations and will merge its operationsinto its Life Brands division.The France-based ad/PR conglomeratesaid Publicis Life Brands Resolute willemploy nearly 100 staffers. Resolutefounders — Paul Blackburn, former managingdirector of Fleishman-Hillard’s U.K. operation,and Ketchum alum Anna Korving —were named joint managing directors<strong>report</strong>ing to Publicis HealthcareCommunications Group chief Alain Sarraf.Resolute also has a New York outpostheaded by Porter Novelli vet MichaelDurand, and a "satellite office" inPittsburgh.Sarraf said Resolute's strategic and PRcapabilities blend well with the Life Brandsunits’ digital and advertising offerings.Republican National Committee websiteand Rep. Michele Bachmann wants peoplein Minnesota “armed and dangerous” tooppose the Obama administration.Bachmann also called the U.S. government“this gangster government.”When did “civility” get replaced by rudenessand crudeness? Who is to blame? Theentertainment sector takes a share ofresponsibility. The advertising industryshares guilt for “anything goes” TV <strong>com</strong>mercials.Political PR people are culpablefor not speaking out against uncivil behaviorat rallies that they help organize.And what about those crazed TV pundits?American society at large sharesblame for meekly accepting the decay ofgood manners that has pervaded its people.Once upon a time, there used to be civilitybetween political opponents.Those of us who worked on politicalcampaigns, before the manufactured newsthat is now passed off as authentic news,remember when we could lunch with theopposition without being considered traitors.Alas, much, if not all, of that civility hasvanished. There are many reasons: Specialinterest groups have infiltrated and hold thebalance of power in both the Democraticand Republican parties. Intelligent, successful,<strong>pr</strong>agmatic businessmen and others whohave the good of the country in their heartshave decided not to enter the political arenabecause they know that the opposition willattempt to destroy their reputations if anyminor irregularity is found in their past,leaving the Congressional balance of powerto extremists in both parties.As a result of this “gotcha politics,” weget an intelligent, inexperienced, too-eagerto-<strong>com</strong><strong>pr</strong>omiseformer senator from Illinoisand a seemingly unintelligent, half-termgovernor from Alaska, whose attributes arethat she looks cute when she delivers a putdownline, likes tea parties and has incendiary<strong>com</strong>ments on her website.But the major cul<strong>pr</strong>its for the lack ofpolitical civility are the media, e<strong>special</strong>lythe round-the-clock cable pontificators andtheir cousins on “hate radio.”Rambling with gamblingIn New York City, John Gambling speaksin a courteous tone, but his remarks are notalways as civil. On March 18, talking aboutthe health bill, he called Rep. DennisKucinich “crazy.” And one of his sidekicks,J.J. Kennedy said Obama was using“goons” to round-up votes for the legislation.On March 26, Gambling, referring to<strong>pr</strong>ogressive radio/TV host Ed Schultz, saidperhaps it’s time to revisit the FairnessDoctrine because it’s “unfair to hear thisgarbage from Ed Schultz.” On A<strong>pr</strong>il 7,referring to a news <strong>report</strong> that the WhiteHouse wanted to use language that says notall Muslims are terrorists, he said, but, “Allterrorists are Muslims.” And on A<strong>pr</strong>il 8, hesaid people are calling their insurance <strong>com</strong>paniesasking for the free healthcare nowthat the legislation is law.Just because Gambling isn’t a rant andrave conservative doesn't mean he does notGuest Columnhave an agenda. And just because he has aradio <strong>pr</strong>ogram doesn’t mean he’s alwaysright, even though his political views are<strong>pr</strong>etty far right. Like many of his right wingTV and radio hosts, Gambling also is notafraid to use his supernatural powers whenhe declares that “Americans don’t wantthat,” etc.But on A<strong>pr</strong>il 16, speaking about globalwarming/cap and trade, he expanded hisomnipotent powers to exclaim “the worlddoesn’t want this.” He will say anything toundermine the Obama Administration,regardless of the facts.MSNBC, the liberal network, and FoxNews, the conservative voice, cement theallegiance of their audiences via yellowjournalism appeal. CNN attempts to be alegitimate disseminator of news, but oftenfails.What passes for fair and balanced onthese cable networks are panels <strong>com</strong>posedof an equal number of “iberals” and “conservatives”who are, oh, so knowledgeableabout every issue that is certain to<strong>pr</strong>oduce controversy.Unfortunately, the network news <strong>pr</strong>ograms,which mostly play it straight, nolonger have the clout of the past; neitherdo the Sunday morning political talkshows.But people do talk about and unfortunatelybelieve the outlandish statementson the cable shows and hate radio. That’stoo bad. As long as these stir-’em-up,play-loose- with-the-facts shows keeptheir audiences, civility in politics is dead.That’s why so many young people tuneout those shows and turn to Jon Stewartand Stephen Colbert for news. If they aregoing to get fake news, they might as wellget it from <strong>pr</strong>ograms that admit that mostof what they <strong>report</strong> is false. (New YorkTimes Op-Ed columnist Ross Douthat saidin his A<strong>pr</strong>il 5 column that Stewart’s seriesof debates on torture and interrogationpolicy, in particular — featuring John Yooand Marc Thiessen, among others — havebeen more substantive than anything onFox or MSNBC.)What we need are more analysts likeDavid Gergen and Mort Zuckerman andless like Rush (I’ll leave the country if thehealth legislation wins ap<strong>pr</strong>oval), Sean,Sara, Ann, Rachel, Lou, Keith, Karl, Ed,Michael, Bill and Glenn (whom PeggyNoonan, the conservative columnist of theWall Street Journal, called “crazy.”)Yes, there is civility and voices of reasonregarding politics in the best-of-all countries,but you won’t find much of it on thecable news or hate radio <strong>pr</strong>ograms. To paraphraseSteven Sondheim, “No need to sendin the clowns. They’re already here.” 34JUNE 2010 WWW.ODWYERPR.COM
Tylenol has be<strong>com</strong>e PR’s ‘Watergate’By Jack O’DwyerThe tornado of lies and spin that isJohnson & Johnson/Tylenol issweeping up not only J&J itself butthe slavish media that perpetuate themyths. Johnson & Johnson is up to itsears in <strong>pr</strong>oduct recallsthese days resultingin a public apology byCEO Bill Weldon.Almost every storyabout the currentrecalls mentions whata wonderful job J&Jdid in 1982, whenJack O’Dwyerseven people in theChicago area diedafter taking Tylenolcapsules that had been poisoned withpotassium cyanide.Such characterizations are false. There isnothing wonderful about 1982 murders,or the subsequent murder of23-year-old Diane Elsroth in1986 via poisoned Tylenols.Easily-spiked capsules shouldnever have been mass marketedin the first place and definitelynot after seven peoplewere killed with them.J&J brought them Tylenol tomarket knowing the killer wasstill at large and with manyindications that the Tylenolswere poisoned within J&J itself.That is the claim of formeremployee Scott Bartz whoknows a lot about the distributional<strong>pr</strong>actices of the <strong>com</strong>pany.Several PR <strong>pr</strong>ofessors have written thatthe five-day delay in pulling Tylenol capsulesfrom the market should never bereferred to as “immediate” or “instant,”and that there is no way of knowing howmuch the <strong>pr</strong>ofit motive figured in J&J’sdecision to re-market the capsules.The <strong>pr</strong>ofs, quoted in the online PRJournal of PRSA hosted by Prof. DonWright, also focus on the rarely mentioned$100K reward that J&J offered inboth the 1982 and 1986 murders. Theywrite that this small sum was J&J’s wayof claiming it had nothing to do with themurders.To this day, the case remains unsolved.Among other interesting statements tobe brought out in a book by Bartz thissummer called “The Tylenol Mafia,” isthat Arthur Hull Hayes Jr., FDAPR’s Watergate?Commissioner in 1982, left the FDA in1983 and signed a ten-year $1,000 permonthcontract with Burson-Marsteller,PR firm for Tylenol.Records dug up by Bartz show thatHayes then became vice chairman andmedical director of NelsonCommunications, founded in 1987 byformer J&J executive Wayne Nelson. The<strong>com</strong>pany got 39% of its $86 million inrevenues from J&J in 1996. Nelson headedMcNeil Consumer Products Co., createdto market Tylenol in capsules.J&J’s claim of lack of responsibility isa legal stance and not one that plays in thecourt of public opinion.We have e-mailed media that reflexivelysing the <strong>pr</strong>aises of J&J and are havinglittle luck in getting any of them tochange their minds.Media reject Tylenol corrections• The Economist, which said A<strong>pr</strong>il 10that J&J/Tylenol is the “gold standard ofcrisis management,” blew us off.That remark was in a columncalled “Schumpeter” written byAdrian Woolridge.Business EditorEdward McBride said that “Inthe context of Toyota’s recentfailings, or Tiger Woods’ infidelities,or any of the otherepisodes referred to in the article,J&J’s decision to recallTylenol was very <strong>pr</strong>ompt —although the firm may wellhave made subsequent mistakes.“It also seems unfair to saythat such easily spiked capsulesshould never have been marketed. To thisday, supermarkets and drug stores acrossAmerica and around the world remainfull of <strong>pr</strong>oducts that could easily be tamperedwith.”• New York Times <strong>report</strong>er NatashaSinger has been unreachable. She <strong>pr</strong>aisedJ&J on May 3 for its “fast and adept”handling of the Tylenol murders in 1982.• The Christian Science Monitor,which said Jan. 15 that what J&J did in1982 “is still regarded as a shining exampleof corporate social responsibility,”said it will look at the matter more closely.• “The Motley Fool (fool.<strong>com</strong>),”which on May 6 said that J&J “hasalways been the poster child for how tohandle a crisis,” was sent one of ourcolumns debunking the Tylenol myths.• Fortune magazine, which on May28, 2007 hailed J&J/Tylenol as the “goldstandard in crisis control,” was sent a columnvia a general Fortune mailbox. Thewriter was Jia Lynn Yant but there is noway of contacting an individual Fortune<strong>report</strong>er via e-mail or phone.• Tactics of PRSA, which <strong>pr</strong>aised J&Jin a full page in 2007 for <strong>pr</strong>oviding “anenduring example of crisis managementdone right,” was also sent a column.Tactics editors should read the Society’sPR Journal.• James Lukaszewski, crisis expert forthe Society, said in an e-mail to us that“The 1982 Tylenol incident remains themost internationally recognized successfulcrisis incident response, even after allthese years.”U of F flunks usThe University of Florida College ofJournalism and Communications wascontacted because a posting on its websitecalled “Effective CrisisManagement” says J&J “conducted animmediate <strong>pr</strong>oduct recall,” “knew theywere not responsible for tampering of the<strong>pr</strong>oduct,” and put “public safety first.”We asked College Dean John Wright,Ph.D., to correct these false or at leastdebatable statements.Replying was David Carlson,Executive Director, Center for MediaInnovation and Research at the College,who said we offered “nothing but opinion.”He said the piece was by a studentwho quoted the Chicago Sun-Times, J&J,and Mark Mitchell of Economic Assn.Int’l, and the piece will be changed whenthose organizations change their opinions.Media News BriefsGOLFWEEK’S NEW PUBLISHERGolfweek magazine has appointed JasonRedditt to the position of Publisher.Redditt joined Golfweek as a member ofthe magazine’s circulation department beforemoving into ad sales. He also served asGolfweek’s Advertising Director for equipmentand apparel.Golfweek officials said the hire reflects themagazine’s “all-en<strong>com</strong>passing strategy todiversify the Golfweek brand while furthersolidifying its position as the favorite golfweekly among serious golfers.”Redditt succeeds Clayton Morris, who willcontinue to oversee the brand’s rapidlyexpanding portfolio of offerings with his <strong>pr</strong>omotionto group publisher.JUNE 2010 WWW.ODWYERPR.COM 35