01.12.2012 Views

csp-frege-revolu

csp-frege-revolu

csp-frege-revolu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HOW PEIRCEAN WAS THE “‘FREGEAN’ REVOLUTION” IN LOGIC? 48<br />

_______. 1932. (Charles Hartshorne & Paul Weiss, eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. II, Elements of Logic.<br />

Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press; 2nd ed., 1960.<br />

_______. 1933a. (Charles Hartshorne & Paul Weiss, eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. III, Exact Logic (Published<br />

Papers). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press; 2nd ed., 1960.<br />

_______. 1933b. (Charles Hartshorne & Paul Weiss, eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. IV: The Simplest<br />

Mathematics. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press; 2nd ed., 1961.<br />

_______. 1934. (Charles Hartshorne & Paul Weiss, eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. V, Pragmatism and<br />

Pragmaticism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press; 2nd ed., 1961.<br />

_______. 1966. (Arthur W. Burks, ed.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. VII-VIII. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard<br />

University Press; originally published: 1958.<br />

_______. 1984. (Edward C. Moore, ed.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, vol. 2: 1867–1871, Bloomington:<br />

Indiana University Press.<br />

_______. 1986. (Christian J. W. Kloesel, ed.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, vol. 3: 1872–1878. Bloomington:<br />

Indiana University Press.<br />

_______. 1989. (Christian J. W. Kloesel, ed.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, vol. 4: 1879–1884. Bloomington/Indianapolis:<br />

Indiana University Press.<br />

_______. 1993. (Christian J. W. Kloesel, ed.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, vol. 5: 1884–1886. Bloomington/Indianapolis:<br />

Indiana University Press.<br />

_______. 2010. (Matthew E. Moore ed.), Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Writings. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University<br />

Press.<br />

_______. n.d.(a) “Dyadic Value System”, MS., n.d., n.p., 2pp. RC MS #6.<br />

_______. n.d.(b). “On the Algebra of Logic”, MS., n.p., n.d., 5 pp. of a manuscript draft; 12 pp. of a typed draft (corrected by CSP);<br />

and 2 pp. of fragments, ca. 1883-84; RC MS #527, RC MS #527s.<br />

_______. n.d.(c). “Chapter III. Development of the Notation, begun”, n.p., n.d., 2 pp., ca. 1883-84; RC MS #568.<br />

PEIRCE, Charles S., & Christine LADD-FRANKLIN. 1902. “Logic”, in James Mark Baldwin (ed.), Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology:<br />

Including Many of the Principal Conceptions of Ethics, Logic, Aesthetics, Philosophy of Religion, Mental Pathology,<br />

Anthropology, Biology, Neurology, Physiology, Economics, Political and Social Philosophy, Philology, Physical<br />

Science, and Education and Giving a Terminology in English, French, German and Italian (New York/London:<br />

Macmillan), vol. II, 21–23.<br />

PIETARINEN, Ahti-Veikko. 2005. “Cultivating Habits of Reason: Peirce and the Logica untens versus Logica docens Distinction”,<br />

History of Philosophy Quarterly 22, 357–372.<br />

_______. 2009a. “Which Philosophy of Mathematics is Pragmaticism?”, in Mathew E. Moore (ed.), New Essays on Peirce’s Mathematical<br />

Philosophy (Chicago: Open Court), 41–62.<br />

_______. 2009b. “Significs and the Origins of Analytic Philosophy”, preprint, 33pp.; printed version: Journal of the History of<br />

Ideas 70, 467–490.<br />

PIETERSMA, Henry. 1967. “Husserl and Frege”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 49, 298–323.<br />

POST, Emil Leon. 1920. Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions; Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University. Abstract<br />

presented in Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 26,437; abstract of a paper presented at the 24 April meeting<br />

of the American Mathematical Society.<br />

_______. 1921. “Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions”, American Journal of Mathematics 43, 169–173;<br />

reprinted: [van Heijenoort 1967a], 264–283.<br />

PRATT, Vaughn R. 1992. “Origins of the Calculus of Binary Relations”, Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer<br />

Science, Santa Cruz, CA, June 1992 (Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Science Press), 248–254.<br />

PRIOR, Anthony N. 1958. “Peirce’s Axioms for Propositional Calculus”, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 23, 135–136.<br />

PUTNAM, Hilary. 1982. “Peirce the Logician”, Historia Mathematica 9, 290–301.<br />

PYCIOR, Helena M. 1981. “George Peacock and the British Origins of Symbolical Algebra”, Historia Mathematica 8, 23–45.<br />

_______. 1983. “Augustus De Morgan’s Algebraic Work: The Three Stages”, Isis 74, 211–226.<br />

QUINE, Willard van Orman. 1962. Methods of Logic. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2 nd ed.<br />

_______. 1982. Methods of Logic. New York: Henry Holt, 4 th ed.<br />

_______. 1985. “In the Logical Vestibule”, Times Literary Supplement, July 12, 1985, p. 767; reprinted as “MacHale on Boole”, in<br />

his Selected Logic Papers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, enlarged ed., 1995), 251–257.<br />

_______. 1995. “Peirce’s Logic”, in Kenneth Laine Ketner (ed.), Peirce and Contemporary Thought: Philosophical Inquiries (New<br />

York: Fordham University Press), 23–31. An abbreviated version appears in the enlarged edition of his Selected Logic<br />

Papers, pp. 258–265.<br />

ROSSER, John Barkley. 1955. “Boole and the Concept of a Function”, Celebration of the Centenary of “The Laws of Thought” by<br />

George Boole, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 57, sect. A, no. 6, 117–120.<br />

ROYCE, Josiah. 1913. “An Extension of the Algebra of Logic”, Journal of Philosophy 10, 617–633; reprinted: Daniel Sommer Robinson<br />

(ed.), Royce’s Logical Essays: Collected Logical Essays of Josiah Royce (Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Co.,<br />

1951), 293–309.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!