12.07.2015 Views

equal by law, unequal by caste - International Dalit Solidarity Network

equal by law, unequal by caste - International Dalit Solidarity Network

equal by law, unequal by caste - International Dalit Solidarity Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Vol. 26, No. 2 Equal <strong>by</strong> Law, Un<strong>equal</strong> <strong>by</strong> Caste 319undermine India’s ability to compete in the global market, 351 isseamlessly “superimposed on . . . traditional <strong>caste</strong> prejudice” 352 to all butseal reservations’ ominous fate. In response, sectors within civil societyand some government actors and agencies have supported a proposedextension of reservations to the private sector. 353The National Commission for Scheduled Castes and ScheduledTribes has stated that the private sector, which continues to enjoygovernment patronage—through concessional land, financing, and exciseand sales tax relief—should also be brought under the purview of thereservation policy. 354 Indian economist, Sukhadeo Thorat, has argued infavor of extending reservations to the private sector to redress marketdiscrimination against <strong>Dalit</strong>s. According to Thorat, <strong>caste</strong>-based marketdiscrimination not only exacerbates in<strong>equal</strong>ity but is also “retrogressivefor economic growth.” 355 Thorat and Newman argue that discriminationhere should be understood as the result of social exclusion of <strong>Dalit</strong>s. 356The restrictions placed <strong>by</strong> <strong>caste</strong> on <strong>Dalit</strong>s’ ability to participate in themarket, and the fact that the benefits of an exploitative market outweighthe intangible costs to <strong>Dalit</strong>s, mean that we cannot simply rely on acompetitive market to self-correct discrimination. 357 Strong opposition tothe private sector proposal remains, however, from both privateemployers and certain political parties. Private employers have criticizedthe government for failing to provide <strong>Dalit</strong>s adequate opportunities ineducation and for imposing upon the private sector the obligation toemploy individuals they deem unqualified. 358As detailed in Part II.C., India has indeed failed to provide <strong>Dalit</strong>sadequate opportunities in education. The notion that more must be doneto increase educational opportunities and ensure non-discrimination in351 Thomas E. Weisskopf, Globalisation and Affirmative Action, in RESERVATION IN PRIVATESECTOR, supra note 158, at 266.352 Teltumbde, supra note 152, at 14.353 See BHOPAL CONFERENCE: CHARTING A NEW COURSE FOR DALITS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY,JAN. 12-13, 2002, THE BHOPAL DECLARATION,http://www.indiatogether.org/dalit/events/bhopal.htm (last visited Aug. 16, 2008). Article 19 ofthe “Bhopal Declaration” calls for mandatory reservations in the private sector.354 See BROKEN PEOPLE, supra note 21, at 4.355 Sukhadeo Thorat, On Reservation Policy for Private Sector, ECON. & POL. WKLY, Apr.-July2004, at 2560.356 Sukhadeo Thorat & Katherine S. Newman, Caste and Economic Discrimination: Causes,Consequences, and Remedies, in LABOR MARKET DISCRIMINATION, supra note 325, at 2.357 Id. at 4.358 Priyanka Bhardwaj, India Debates Private Sector Quotas, ASIA TIMES ONLINE, Feb. 7, 2006,http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/HB07Df01.html (last visited Aug. 16, 2008).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!