12.07.2015 Views

illicit drug use in the eu: legislative approaches - EMCDDA - Europa

illicit drug use in the eu: legislative approaches - EMCDDA - Europa

illicit drug use in the eu: legislative approaches - EMCDDA - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>EMCDDA</strong> <strong>the</strong>matic papersIllicit <strong>drug</strong> <strong>use</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU: <strong>legislative</strong> <strong>approaches</strong>European Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (<strong>EMCDDA</strong>), (2002), Annual report on <strong>the</strong>state of <strong>the</strong> <strong>drug</strong>s problem <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Union and Norway 2002, <strong>EMCDDA</strong>, Lisbon (http://ar2002.emcdda.<strong>eu</strong>.<strong>in</strong>t/).European Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (<strong>EMCDDA</strong>), (2003), Annual report <strong>the</strong> state of <strong>the</strong><strong>drug</strong>s problem <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Union and Norway 2003, <strong>EMCDDA</strong>, Lisbon (http://ar2003.emcdda.<strong>eu</strong>.<strong>in</strong>t/).European Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (<strong>EMCDDA</strong>), (2000), ‘Examen des aspectsjuridiques <strong>in</strong>ternationaux des traitements de substitution’, ELDD Comparative Study, European LegalDatabase on Drugs (http://eldd.emcdda.<strong>eu</strong>.<strong>in</strong>t/databases/eldd_comparative_analyses.cfm).European Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (<strong>EMCDDA</strong>), 2002, Decrim<strong>in</strong>alisation <strong>in</strong> Europe?Recent developments <strong>in</strong> legal <strong>approaches</strong> to <strong>drug</strong> <strong>use</strong> (http://eldd.emcdda.<strong>eu</strong>.<strong>in</strong>t/databases/eldd_country_profiles.cfm).European Parliament (1997), ‘Rapport sur l’harmonisation des législations des Etats membres en matière dedrogues’. A4-0359/97 du 11 novembre 1997.Farrell, M. and Grant, F. (2002), ‘Sparks consult<strong>in</strong>g, courts service f<strong>in</strong>al evaluation of <strong>the</strong> pilot <strong>drug</strong> court’.Kilmer, B. (2002), ‘Do cannabis possession laws <strong>in</strong>fluence cannabis <strong>use</strong>?’. A jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>ternational effort at<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiative of <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>isters of Public Health of Belgium, France, Germany, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, Switzerland.M<strong>in</strong>istry of Public Health of Belgium. Technical Report of <strong>the</strong> International Scientific Conference Brussels,Belgium, 25/2/2002.Krajewski, K. (1994), ‘How flexible are <strong>the</strong> United Nations <strong>drug</strong> Conventions?’ The International Journal ofDrug Policy, 10, 1994 pp. 329–338.Institut Suisse de droit compare (2001), ‘Consolidated legal op<strong>in</strong>ion concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> compatibility ofproposed national -- laws with relevant <strong>in</strong>ternational conventions’ (http://www.-isdc.unil.ch)International Narcotic Control Board (INCB), (1996), General Information: Historical overview of<strong>in</strong>ternational <strong>drug</strong> control and recent <strong>in</strong>ternational <strong>drug</strong> control treaties, Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Material.International Narcotic Control Board (INCB), (1999), Report 1999, (449), United Nations, New York2000.International Narcotic Control Board (INCB), (2001), Report 2001, (214), United Nations, New York2002.International Narcotic Control Board (INCB), (2002), Report 2002, (499), United Nations, New York2003.Letter of <strong>the</strong> Secretary of <strong>the</strong> International Narcotic Control Board Mr Herbert Schaepe at <strong>the</strong> BelgianJustice M<strong>in</strong>istry M. Verwilghen on 28 March 2003.MacCoun, R. J. and R<strong>eu</strong>ter, P. (2001), ‘Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g alternative cannabis regimes’. British Journal ofPsychiatry, 178, pp. 123–128.M<strong>in</strong>istère de la Justice (1999), Circulaire relative aux réponses judiciaires aux toxicomanes, 17 ju<strong>in</strong> 1999;NOR JUS A 9900148 C.National Drug Monitor (2000), Fact sheet, Cannabis Policy Up-to-date, 2000 (http:www.trimbos.nl).Nations Unies (ONU) (1975), ‘Commentaires sur la Convention unique sur les stupéfiants de 1961’, ONU,New York (French version).47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!