The Reformed Committee on Food Security. A briefing paper for ...
The Reformed Committee on Food Security. A briefing paper for ...
The Reformed Committee on Food Security. A briefing paper for ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>tact Group Process:Producing a Blueprint <strong>for</strong> CFS Re<strong>for</strong>m<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> mechanism <strong>for</strong> producing the re<strong>for</strong>m document was a C<strong>on</strong>tact Group especially established bythe Bureau of the CFS under the visi<strong>on</strong>ary leadership of its Chair Maria Del Carmen Squeff, AlternatePermanent Representative of Argentina to FAO. In a departure from the normal working practicesof the CFS (and other inter-governmental bodies) the C<strong>on</strong>tact Group provided unprecedented participati<strong>on</strong>opportunities <strong>for</strong> civil society, who were more or less entitled to the same degree of accessand participati<strong>on</strong> as member states - tabling and resp<strong>on</strong>ding to re<strong>for</strong>m proposals through the C<strong>on</strong>tactGroup’s website and attending and intervening at the Rome meetings. Though civil society were notthe <strong>on</strong>ly actors invited into the extended C<strong>on</strong>tact Group, and the full list of participants also includedother UN bodies and, in theory at least, the private sector, it was widely recognised by member statesthat civil society participati<strong>on</strong> was fundamental to the successful c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> of the process and thevisi<strong>on</strong> of the final document.From its first meeting in April 2009 to the adopti<strong>on</strong> of the re<strong>for</strong>m document in October later thatyear, the C<strong>on</strong>tact Group met physically a total of seven times, with much website mediated activityin-between. During this time the re<strong>for</strong>m document went through a number of different drafts, as C<strong>on</strong>tactGroup participants worked within four Working Groups to c<strong>on</strong>sider 1) the Role and Visi<strong>on</strong> of therenewed CFS; 2) its Membership and Decisi<strong>on</strong> Taking; 3) its Mechanisms and Procedures, and; 4) itsHigh Level Panel of Experts. Within the c<strong>on</strong>text of these working groups discussi<strong>on</strong> and negotiati<strong>on</strong>focused implicitly up<strong>on</strong> such questi<strong>on</strong>s as:• Who should be entitled to participate in the renewed CFS and what should their participati<strong>on</strong>rights be?• What roles should the CFS play within the global food security “system” and how authoritativeshould it be?• With which other parts of the internati<strong>on</strong>al system should the CFS be related, andhow?• What “mechanisms” does the renewed CFS need in order to be able to fulfill its roles?11