The Editor's CommentHas A New GospelBeen Discovered?Press agents, it has been said, can popularizeanything if they are given the green light. Apparentlythey are presently proving this point by callingwidespread attention to the recent publicationof the ancient manuscript entitled, "The Gospel accordingto Thomas."Soon people all over the country will knowthat the manuscript was discovered in Egyptin 1945 and that it claims to give <strong>11</strong>4 sayingsof Christ and lists the Apostle Thomas as thecompiler.Two Catholic Biblical scholars have comment^ed that the publication has historical interest, butlittle or no religious value. Msgr. Skehan of theCatholic University said: "The many false claimsmade for it in recent years can now be recognized- as nonsense."He went on to explain that the "sayings ofChrist are merely a parody of the first threeGospels. And the parody was not contrived tofurther Christian truths, but "to win followersfor a pagan religion known as Gnosticism."The publication, however, will appeal to manywho cherish novelty in religion and rejoice whensomething unexpected turns up. Apparently it hasever been so. Other apocryphal books in the earlycenturies of Christianity attained a certain popularity.There was a Gospel of St. Peter laced withthe flavor of the Docetist heresy. The Shepherd ofHermas was admired by many, but was not inspiredby God. Another book known as the-Acts of Paul,so Tertullian tells us, tells how St. Paul converteda young pagan girl who in turn became a preacherof the Gospel.According to Daniel-Kops, there were otherGospels according to St. James, St. Matthew,and even according to Nicodemus, infancy Gospelsfull of details about the first years ofJesus:, pseudo acts of the Apostles, and so on."They form a curious world," Daniel-Kopswrites, "in which snippets of truth float on asea of delirium."We can be certain that God never intended theBible to get larger as time went on. The canon ofinspired books was fixed many centuries ago andwill never be changed to admit a new discovery. Oneof the consolations of a Catholic's faith is the factthat every ancient manuscript brought to light, ifit is genuine, will serve to confirm what the Churchhas always taught.sTRANGELittle-KnownBy M. J. MURRAYBUT TRUFacts for Catholics ECopyright <strong>1959</strong>, N.C.W.C. News Service-THESF ELABORATE MEDIEVAL FLOOR-TlLFS CAN STILL. BE SEEhl IHTHE RUIMED CLOISTERS OFTlTCWFiELD /\&BEY, ZMGLAHDwhere VTAUGUSTINEheld a Synod of theENGLISH BISHOPS.The WALLS OF THISCATHOLIC CHURCHOM THE CHANNELISLANDSBETWEENTHROUGHOUT THE ENGLAND frFRANCEREFORMATION IU EH6LAHDARE EMBEDDEDMASS W/Aff C£IEBRAT£D WlTrt FRAGMENTSIN THIS SECRET CHAPEL OF COLORED CHINABUILT INTO THE ATTIC OF FROM ALL OVERA SECLUDED COTTAGE . THE WORLD .Jhcs $00 yearo{U OAK.is Saidto"Niece of Yours, Sir*WASHINGTON LETTERMorality Of Nuclear WarDebated By World ScholarsBy J. J. GILBERTUCWC News ServiceThe frightening devastationinherent in nuclear warfare hascreated a host of problems bothuniquely knotty and uniquely urgent.Perhaps none is more thornyand, ultimately, more importantthan that of the morality of nuclearwar.Two recent statements — oneby an American Catholic scholar,the other by a British Catholicarchbishop — indicate thatthe morality of modern war is aproblem which is increasinglydisturbing to the Christian conscience.2-PRONGED APPROACHThey indicate, too, that anyserious discussion of the subjectmay have to take a twoprongedapproach.One aspect was outlined byDr. William V. O'Brien, chairmanof the Institute of WorldPolity at Georgetown University,in an address to the recentWashington 1 conference ofthe Catholic Association for InternationalPeace.Dr. O'Brien spoke on "TheRole of Force in the InternationalJuridicial Order." Hecontended that it is the dutyof moralists, military men andlegal experts to work togetherto hammer out a "coherenttheory of force" which canbe applied to modern warfare.He argued that it is imperativeto develop realisticprinciples and rules for the regulationand limitation of modernwarfare, including nuclearwarfare." He added: "TheChristian tradition requires thatinternational law and moralitypenetrate into the heat of battle.".Dr. O'Brien did not specifywhen and where his proposedgreat debate on, nuclear war isto be conducted. But a Britisharchbishop supplied his own answerrecently when he suggestedthat the morality of modernwar be placed on the agenda forthe coming ecumenical councilannounced by Pope John XXIII.Archbishop Thomas Roberts,S. J., retired Archbishop ofBombay, told a peace conferencein Birmingham, England,that he had already made thisproposal in a message to theVatican Secretariat of-State.The Archbishop said his messageto the Holy See emphasizedthat "the morality of warunder modern conditions disturbsthinking people everywhere,especially in countrieswhere freedom of consciencerules."Nevertheless, he said, he didnot suggest that the Holy Seeindulge in "authoritiative pronouncementswhich might onlydisturb good faith, court rebellionor disobedience, break underthe,weight of vested interestswhere the whole nationaleconomy is now geared to war."What he did suggest, ArchbishopRoberts continued, isthe setting up of a body ofexpert theologians, historiansand economists to study theproblem in preparation for theecumenical council.It would be the function ofsuch a body to "educate Catholicleaders in a sphere hithertoneglected," "clarify issues onwhich guidance is sought" and"coordinate in a supranationalatmosphere all work for peacebased on fundamentals of morality."-'HOW' OR 'WHETHER'?Dr. O'Brien' declared that hewishes to see investigation ofthe relatively pragmatic questionof how nuclear war can beconducted in" accord with morality.Archbishop Roberts, onthe other har.d, stated that it ishis personal opinion that nuclearwar cannot be justifiedmorally.TRUTH OF THE MATTERShould An Incurable PatientBe Told He # s Going To Die?By FATHER JAMES J. WALSHA statement by a doctor, reported in the papers, caught theattention of many people concerned with the problem of death.A. Dickonson Wright of the Royal College of Surgeons said: "... Ifeel that it is an impertinence to tell a man that he is aboutto die." He - was definitely against telling cancer patients aboutimpending death.Anyone who has had a lovedlife and prepare well and ferventlyfor the next. Everone slowly dying of a malig-"iestnancy has very likely gonethrough the ordeal of trying toconceal the true nature of thesickness, or else had to facethe unknown reaction of the patient,once he learned that hehad an incurable disease. Ineither case, considerable anxietywas experienced.We should realize that aserious question of justice andrights is involved here. A decisionto tell, or not to tellan incurable patient shouldnever depend on how one personallyfeels about it. Dr.Dickonson calls such a revelationan impertinence, thatis, an insult. But not tellinga patient the truth on thecontrary, could be a seriousinjustice.Among the ethical directivesin force in Catholic hospitals,this one should be known to doctorand layman: "Everyone hasthe right and the duty to preparefor the solemn moment ofdeath. Unless it is clear, therefore,that a dying patient is alreadywell prepared for deathas regards both temporal andspiritual affairs, it is the physician'sduty to inform him ofhis critical condition or to havesome other responsible personimpart this information."TEMPORAL AFFAIRSTake the matter of a patient'stemporal affairs first. If he hasnot made a will and has notbeen given an opportunity tocome to a decision about mattersthat affect the future wellbeingof his family, both the patientand his relatives are thevictims of injustice.Many doctors, unlike the custornof some years ago, nowfrankly tell their patients thetruth and thus, give them anopportunity to draw closer toGod, to cut the bonds with thiswho has dealt with L ablepatients can bear witness thatthe usual reaction of the onetold of his serious condition isnot blank despair and hysteria.Most of them, so wearyfrom the struggle to make alittle gain, are somewhat relievedto realize the fault isnot their own. And a goodCatholic at this point can behelped immeasurably towardsgenuine peace by his priest,who gently will make knownto him the wonderful helps inthe Sacrament designed byGod for those bearing theheavy cross of suffering.Only the Lord know howmany ordinary Catholi liedafter making great strides inholiness during a lingering illness,because they were taughthow to use those previous hoursto make reparation for a lifetimeDUTY TO INFORMNeedless to say, as FatherGerald Kelly writes, "the dutyof informing the patient of hiscritical condition so that he canprepare well for death does notnecessarily include the obligationof telling him the precisenature of his illness."Nor does it mean, as somesuppose, that the bearer ofsuch unhappy news mustbluntly and coldly read off asentence of death. If a patientis told at least that his illnessis of such a serious naturethat a wise person wouldtake prudent steps to put allhis interests in order, he willbe given enough to stir him tohis duty.If we are more concernedwith the eternal welfare of thesick than with a well meaningmomentary deception, we willrespect his right to know hiscondition.i . The Diocese of MiamilK6sWeekly Publication^ MM ^m^W ^fTf Embracing Florida's 16 South-B MB ^m ' ^^^ era Counties; Broward, Char-MB B B ^^>lott< ". Collier. Dade, De SotoS fm Hf J M j Glades, Hardee, Hendry, High-W\B ^^V^^^W lands, Indian River, Lee, Martin,**^*- ^^^-^^"^ Monroe Oke.echobee, . PalmBeach^ St. Lueie.Editorial: FLaza 8-0543Advertising and Circulation. PLaza 4-2561THE VOICE PUBLISHING CO., INC.The Most Rev. Coleman F. Carroll, Bishop of Miami, PresidentMonsignor John J. Fitzpatrick . Executive EditorMonsignor James F. NelanManagerial ConsultantFather James J. WalshEditorial ConsultantJohn J. WardEditorCharles Shreiner '. Assistant Edi* —George H. Monahan News E*Marjorie L. FillyawWilliam P. Dale ..«'.....Women's Edu...Business ManagerJoseph S. ZilleyCirculation ManagerSecond-class postage paid at Miami, FloridaSubscription rates: $5 a year; single copy 15 cents.Published every Thursdny at 6301 Blscayne Boulevard, Miami M. Florida.Address all mail to P.O. Box 52-684, Miami 52, Florida.Member Catholic Press Association. National Catholic Welfare ConferenceNews Service.News items intended for publication must be received by Friday noon,prior to following week's edition.Page 6 THE VOiC£. Miami, Ffa. Horamber 4, ±959
SpareTheWhat?By Joseph Breig"Spare the rod and spoil thechild," said Mister Exx."It depends," said Mister Zee."Depends, your grandmother.Depends --what?""On t.leanings of words,for one thing."Mister Exx bristled. "Youcan understand English, can'tyou?""All right," said Mister Zee.Let's see how plain it is. Whatdoes the word 'rod' mean?"• * *THAT'S EASY," said Exx."It means paddle. Or switch. Ora swat on the bottom. Punishment.That's what it means.""I see," said Zee. ."Andwhat does 'child' mean?""WeUW Exx hesitated.Then he plunged in. A minor issomebody under 21 years ofage."* *SO A COLLEGE student is achild?" inquired Zee. "And a20-year-old soldier is a child?"Is an eight-year-old achild? A 10 year-old? A 12-year old? Why, we've got 12-year-olds in high school. We'vegot chess champions that age.And accomplished musicians.Mathematicians, even. We'vegot 12-year-old saints and martyrs—.""All right, all right!" interruptedExx. "So it depends onwhat is meant by the word'child.' All the same, whatever"a child is, spare the rod and youspoil him — or her."• * *THAT'S ANOTHER thing,"said Zee. "Can you imagineyourself taking a stick to a 14-year-old girl?""Well, no," admitted Exx."No, that's pretty silly.""So maybe the word 'rod'doesn't necessarily meanpaddle or switch.""What else can it mean?"argued Exx."Maybe," said Mister Zeequietly, "it means incentive, encouragement,direction, supervision." •, straight A's forgood pe* .mance of lessons?Like praise for accomplishment?• * *"MAYBE 'ROD' means responsibility,too. Maybe itmeans showing a child how tobe self-reliant, egging him onto use his head, reasoning withhim, giving him a good pridein achievement, opening hiseyes to the talents and opportunitieshe has been given? Eh?"Maybe sparing the rodwould be like not telling ayoungster about God, andwhat a wonderful thing it isto have the Creator createyou, and how your Maker expectsT" -*O measure up, andall tha"Mind, I'm not saying there'snever a time when a lick ortwo might be necessary. I'mjust saying that parents oughtto remember those signs theysee in offices.""What.signs?" inquired Exx."The ones that say 'Think.' "SUM AND SUBSTANCEWhere Is U.S. Going?By FATHER JOHN B. SHEERIN-Some years ago I saw a finemotion picture called "I KnowWhere I'm Going." The heroineof this British movie knew preciselywhere she was going andhow to get there.One of the biggest problemsfacing the United States is todecide where we are going —as a nation. At present wehave no goal, no purpose, nobeliefs to which we are committed.As Adlai Stevensonsaid recently, "I believe that .we have confused the free withthe free and easy."George Kennan, in one of hisrare public appearances, calledattention to this lack of purpose.Speaking in Washington, he describedthe U. S. as a nationwithout any clearly developedsense of national purpose. "Ifyou ask me" he said, "whethersuch a country has in the longrun good chances of competingwith a purposeful, serious anddisciplined society such as thatof the Soviet Union, I must saythat the answer is no." 'LOVES COMFORTInstead of a country thatknows where it is going, Kennanfinds America a country thatloves personal comfort andlacks social discipline, a formlessnation that is not makingprogress towards any specialgoal.He points out that the contrastbetween the U.S. andSoviet Russia is tragic inthis respect. It must be saidfor Khrushchev and his communistconfreres that theyknow where they're going.They have a goal and theyare working and sacrificingto attain the goal.When he was here, Khrushchevwas the perfect picture ofthe dedicated communist. Hedidn't hesitate to acknowledgehis aim. While d en y i n g hewanted to bury us under bombs,he did say that communismwould bury capitalism and thatworld-wide communism is hisdream.SINGLE-MINDEDiJames Reston in the NewYork Times said of Khrushchevin America, "He never traveleda mile or made a speech orkissed a baby or talked to aworker or even made a toastthat did not further his centralpurpose." Reston referred toKhrushchev's trip as "thisastonishing exhibition of singlemindedpurpose."Thoughtful men in Washingtonrealize we will have to developa sense of purpose ifwe hope to compete with theSoviets. At the beginning ofthis year, President Eisenhowerannounced he would appointa committee to studythis matter of a national purposebut as yet no committeehas been appointed.Is it that the President fearsAmericans would never agreeon a common purpose, a commonset of beliefs, a nationalgoal? Meanwhile we drift in foreignpolicy. Having no goal, wehave no sense of direction. Wewait till the Russians act, thenwe respond.REDS CALL TUNEWe are perpetually on the defensive.We watch the skies fornew sputniks, then our scientistsscramble to catch up with Russianscience. The Russiansstrike in Korea or the Far Eastand we strike back. We fightbut they have chosen the battlefield.They call the tune and wedance.I suppose there are a greatmany Americans who thinkwe should not necessarily believein anything except thefreedom to do as we please.But there is a hard core ofthoughtful Americans who areconvinced we must have somebeliefs, some purpose as a nation.They believe we willnever beat communism simplyby being against communism.We must be for something.We have gadgets and quizprograms and Lady Chatterley'sLover but is that what we arefor? Do they represent the purposeand direction of our nationalexistence? Will they inspireus to conquer a triumphantcommunism that now numbers,one third of the world'spopulation and can boast of tremendoustechnological, scientificand economic successes?Thinking Americans know wemust get together and decide /what we do believe in. For, ifwe don't have any goal to striveand fight for, we had betterthrow in the sponge.MAKING MARRIAGE CLICKIs Teacher Like Parent?By Msgr. IRVING A. DeBLANC"Just how close should ateacher get to his students?One in our school wants totake the place of parents.When we disagree with thisteacher, it upsets our boy'swhole day at school. In thismatter, when is a teachergood?"—F. H.About two years ago, therewas a study made by RogerBley in which he asked severalhundred students to select thequalities of an ideal teacher.They made a notable choice."He must first of all be understanding.He must like students,be interested in them, and wintheir confidence." They pointedthen to a second quality: clarityin teaching. Thirdly, he mustbe interesting and have a senseof humor. Fourthly, he must bejust and impartial. Fifthly, hemust be able to command respectwithout using punishment,and sixthly, be conscientiousand show that he enjoyed hisjob.There are some teachers whoare cold and distant. It is theirway of maintaining authority,or "of making a boy moremanly," or of helping him concentrateon his work. This attitudeoften really indicates selfishnessand an underestimationof the child. Some teachers arejust plain authoritarian. Theyhave unbending rules. Thiscould be in self-defense or acompensation for failures elsewhere.They are often depressed,pessimist, negative.Then, there is the "easygoing" teacher. She wants to"buddy" with her studentsand is considered an equalby them. She overstresses affectionand finds later thataffection alone is far fromsufficient in character formation.There is likewise the "anxious"teacher who is obsessedwith some inferiority. There isthe one who is a sheer "optimist"and never sees dangers.There is the "extrovert" who isopen to the world. There is the"introvert" who is more concernedwith his or her ownproblems than those of thestudent. There is the "difficult"teacher who solves no problemsbecause he has not solved hisown.-Finally, there is the warm,"understanding" teacher. Heknows everyone by name,makes every child feel likedand wanted, creates a climateof warmth. He is fatherly butnot possessive. The child isfree to grow, yet supported,protected, yet independent,treated tenderly yet discreetly.The needs of a child changewith his age. At four or fivehe needs protection, kindness,and multitude of activities.At five and six she wantsmore freedom. At six to theage of puberty he is outgoing.Now it is a rather calm periodand he mainly asks forsupport and sympathy. From<strong>11</strong> to 14 her troubles startagain. The family and adultsin general oppose her "unreasonably."Teachers may fall into thecategory of "enemies." Yet, itis a time when the child needsto admire and to identify. Heneeds discreet guidance andsomeone who will listen to himwithout intruding. He pleadsunconsciously for security, individualattention, understanding,human warmth, spontaneous-encouragement, solidity,firmness and a profound joy. Itis not a superficial, amusingjoy. It is a joy which is an essentialcondition for productivework.A good teacher learns all hecan about the family life of achild but never lets on howmuch he really knows. He neverurges students to be good toplease a teacher. He does notpermit a child to become attachedto him. He^ tries to preventidentifications and transferences.He is a teacher, nota pal, not a father.AN ALTAR BOY NAMED "SPECK""Does he always have to have top billing?"QUESTION CORNERHow Was Second PopeMade Head Of Church?MSGR. JOHN J. FITZPATRICKHow was the second pope named? History tells us thathis name was St. Linus. But I don't know of any collegeof cardinals that could have elected him.• I really don't know how hewas named. None of the historybooks I have consulted saysanything more than that Linuswas the successor of St. Peter,who was the first pope.I suppose they were toobusy ducking the local gendarmes,who had warrants outfor their arrest, and didn'thave time to record muchthat happened to them. Theywere probably too busy makinghistory to write it.What is certain from ourreading is that the Bishop ofRome was from the very beginningacknowledged by one andall as the Vicar of Christ, thevisible head of the Church.Even during the lifetime of St.John the Apostle, questions weretaken for solution to the Bishopof Rome.It may well have been thatSt. Peter announced from hisprison cell in Rome that hissuccessor as Bishop of Romewas to be Linus. It was necessaryonly for him to acceptand he was automatically thenew supreme pontiff at thesame time.It could be also that a group,appointed and recognized as authorizedto choose another Bishopof Rome, may possibly havegone into a short huddle or eonclave,like our modern-day cardinals,do and chose Linus.It may well be also that thefirst two or three they chosewouldn't accept and turnedthem down. Finally Linusshouldered the burden. Andwhat a burden it must havebeen in those days when to bea Christian meant death!We note no difficulties arisingbecause of the appointment orelection of Linus. None of theliving Apostles sent off fieryletters denouncing him or claimingthat they had a prior rightto be head of the Church.There was never any difficultyin the early church aboutjuridical decisions (appointmentsof bishops and so on).After Linus, who ruled theChurch until the hatchet-men gothim in about the year 76, wasone of the 24, first popes whowere martyrs to the Cause.His feast is observed by theChurch on Sept. 23.• • • .Is it possible for the Ro-*sary to be recited over theradio every day? They doit up North over many ofthe stations.Whether or not such a thingstarts here depends on whetherany such offer is made by a stationand whether the Bishopthinks the recitation of the Rosaryprudent and advisable.Unless the response would begreat, it would not be good tofoster such a thing. It wouldbe more of a disgrace thanan aid to devotion to the BlessedVirgin Mary.Take a fast look at the poorshowing we have in many of ourchurches, when the Rosary isannounced for recitation duringthe months of May and October.Rarely do you see largenumbers of Our Lady's clientsrushing to join in, even thoughthe recitation of the Rosary(Continued on page 25)November .6, <strong>1959</strong> THE VOICE Miami,'Fto. Page* V