12.07.2015 Views

A Theory of Change for Tackling Violence Against ... - ActionAid

A Theory of Change for Tackling Violence Against ... - ActionAid

A Theory of Change for Tackling Violence Against ... - ActionAid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

72.3Holistic and multi-sectoral approachesare more likely to have impactThis principleis especiallyrelevant at theinterventionsstage <strong>of</strong> the<strong>Theory</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Change</strong>.Figure 1: A Holistic and multi-sectoral approachMultiple levelsAcross sectorsIndividualEconomic lifeRelationshipEducationCommunityHealthSocietyJusticeSecuritySocial welfareMultiple time-framesShort-term(2-5 years)Medium-term(5-8 years)Long-term(8-10+ years)The <strong>Theory</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Change</strong> assumes that a holisticapproach is more likely to have greaterimpact: coordinated interventions operatingat multiple levels, across sectors and overmultiple time-frames are more likely toaddress the various aspects <strong>of</strong>, and there<strong>for</strong>ehave greater impact on, tackling violenceagainst women and girls (see Figure 1 above).<strong>Violence</strong> against women and girls manifests atevery level <strong>of</strong> society, from interpersonal andfamilial relationships, through communitiesand right up throughout society, including viathe state. This is known as the ‘ecologicalmodel’. 27 Interventions that address only onelevel <strong>of</strong> the ecological model or use only oneintervention method can achieve results, butthese will be limited. Legal re<strong>for</strong>m is a goodexample. Despite laws that criminalise maritalrape at the level <strong>of</strong> ‘society’, marital rape is stillwidely practised at the ‘relationship’ level in anumber <strong>of</strong> countries because social norms atthe level <strong>of</strong> ‘relationship’ have not sufficientlychanged. It is there<strong>for</strong>e necessary to pursuechange at all levels – from the family andhousehold, through to national andinternational structures and institutions.Single-sector responses can similarly achieveonly limited results. Integrated multi-sectoralapproaches that use a variety <strong>of</strong> methods tocreate change are better able to tackleviolence against women and girls, 28 especiallyin terms <strong>of</strong> ‘primary prevention’ ef<strong>for</strong>ts –stopping violence be<strong>for</strong>e it occurs andproviding protection <strong>for</strong> women at risk <strong>of</strong>violence. 29 In particular, there is a need torecognise the links between prevention andresponse interventions, where responses toviolence can integrate services that helpprotect women and girls from furtherviolence. For example, strengthening justicesystems without improving health andpsycho-social welfare systems could leavesurvivors unable to pursue justice orprotection from the police, because they arestruggling to cope with the physical andemotional trauma <strong>of</strong> the violence they haveexperienced.Different sorts <strong>of</strong> changes take different timeperiods to be achieved, with social changeand changes to social norms (includingbehaviours and practices) taking longer. It isthere<strong>for</strong>e helpful to plan interventions overmultiple time-frames. You can read moreabout this in the Guidance on Monitoring andEvaluating <strong>for</strong> Programming on <strong>Violence</strong>against Women and Girls (section 2b on p.5).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!