01.12.2012 Views

Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Research ... - Rural Housing

Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Research ... - Rural Housing

Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Research ... - Rural Housing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Rapid</strong> <strong>Evidence</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Literature on <strong>the</strong> Purchase and Use <strong>of</strong> Second Homes<br />

Table 4: Reasons for Having a Second Home<br />

Reasons for Having a<br />

Second Home<br />

Holiday Home/<br />

Retirement Home/<br />

Weekend Home<br />

Working Away from<br />

Home<br />

32<br />

Percentages<br />

1996/9 (from<br />

Gilbert, 2001)<br />

1999/<br />

2000<br />

2000/1 2001/2 2002/3 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6<br />

39 36 33 45 35 38 55 55<br />

20 20 21 13 13 10 22 20<br />

Living Away from Home Not recorded 5 1 2 3 4 6 3<br />

Marital Breakdown 5 3 2 1 2 3 1 3<br />

Intending to Sell/Waiting<br />

to Move etc<br />

Not recorded 5 3 4 1 1<br />

Investment 26 29 33 40 41 40<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r 22 16 20 15 18 19<br />

22 29<br />

Source: Communities and Local Government (various dates: Survey <strong>of</strong> English <strong>Housing</strong>: London, CLG, Live Tables (S355) [WWW]<br />

Available from http://www.communities.gov.uk/housing/housingresearch/housingresearch/housingsurveys/surveyenglish/livetables/<br />

owneroccupiersincluding/ [Accessed 30/08/07].<br />

Please note:<br />

Definitions and survey approach changed in 2004/5 – for example, only owner occupiers were counted.<br />

More than one reason could be given for second home ownership.<br />

Types <strong>of</strong> property purchased<br />

107. There is a general consensus that in rural areas <strong>the</strong>re has been a shift from <strong>the</strong> purchase <strong>of</strong> small, low<br />

maintenance property in a local vernacular design tradition (Countryside Agency, 2002a; Gallent, 2007; and<br />

Wallace et al, 2005). Moreover, <strong>the</strong> locational pattern has changed over <strong>the</strong> last few decades from deep/remote<br />

rural to a broader cross section <strong>of</strong> areas including accessible rural locations (Wallace et al, 2005, p42). Similarly,<br />

<strong>the</strong> perception that second home purchasers buy older abandoned/low demand properties is not supported by<br />

any recent studies. Although ‘picturesque cottages’ remain popular, second home purchasers are considering<br />

new build properties, bungalows and former council houses. However, <strong>the</strong>re is relatively little quantitative<br />

information available at <strong>the</strong> national level to support <strong>the</strong>se views that are <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>the</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong> interviews with<br />

local real estate pr<strong>of</strong>essionals.<br />

108. From urban and rural perspectives, Gilbert (2001, pp17-18) surveyed a number <strong>of</strong> estate agents in<br />

different parts <strong>of</strong> England and concluded that <strong>the</strong>re were a number <strong>of</strong> emerging trends, including:<br />

• Continued market for country and seaside cottages;<br />

• Increased demand for flats, especially with a marina/water/sea outlook; and<br />

• Growing interest in larger detached properties in <strong>the</strong> country (which may become <strong>the</strong> ‘main home’ with a<br />

flat in an urban centre eventually becoming <strong>the</strong> second home).<br />

109. Overall, he concluded that <strong>the</strong> traditional view <strong>of</strong> second homes involving a purchase <strong>of</strong> a desirable rural<br />

cottage is no longer an adequate representation as a more mixed and varied pattern <strong>of</strong> purchases is evident.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!