HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN STREET <strong>USA</strong>2008sentencing judges are required to take into account other factors when sentencing defendants. 18The impact of the sentencing enhancement law going forward may therefore be reduced.II.Proposed <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hate</str<strong>on</strong>g> Crime Legislati<strong>on</strong> in the 111 th C<strong>on</strong>gressIn 2009, a number of proposals were introduced to exp<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> federal hate crime law. Two piecesof legislati<strong>on</strong> have been introduced that specifically includes homeless people in hate crimelaws.A. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hate</str<strong>on</strong>g> Crime Legislati<strong>on</strong> Directed Toward Crimes Against Homeless Pers<strong>on</strong>sIn 2009, two hate-crimes bills menti<strong>on</strong>ed the homeless, specifically, so far. H.R. 3419 wasintroduced <strong>on</strong> July 30. This bill seeks to amend the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hate</str<strong>on</strong>g> Crimes Statistics Act to includecrimes against the homeless. U.S. Rep. Eddie Bernice Johns<strong>on</strong> (D-TX) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 13 other U.S.Representatives co-sp<strong>on</strong>sored this bill. The bill was referred to the House JudiciaryCommittee.H.R. 262, the David Ray Ritches<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hate</str<strong>on</strong>g> Crime Preventi<strong>on</strong> Act, was introduced by U.S. Rep.Sheila Jacks<strong>on</strong> Lee (D-TX). The bill provides support to victims of hate crimes. Thosevictims who lose their jobs due to the attack can claim unemployment insurance. If a victimloses their house, the Secretary of Housing <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Urban Development can use grants to providehousing for victims including those who were homeless before the attack <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> are now in needof assistance because of the attack.B. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hate</str<strong>on</strong>g> Crime Legislati<strong>on</strong> Directed Toward Crimes Against Other Pers<strong>on</strong>sAs in sessi<strong>on</strong>s of C<strong>on</strong>gress, the bill that has made the most progress toward enactment is theLocal Law Enforcement <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hate</str<strong>on</strong>g> Crimes Preventi<strong>on</strong> Act, known in the Senate as the MatthewShepard Local Law Enforcement <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hate</str<strong>on</strong>g> Crimes Preventi<strong>on</strong> Act. This Act would, am<strong>on</strong>g otherthings, add a new secti<strong>on</strong> to the federal code entitled “<str<strong>on</strong>g>Hate</str<strong>on</strong>g> Crime Acts,” which would createpenalties for certain kinds of completed or attempted willful injury against a pers<strong>on</strong> because ofthe pers<strong>on</strong>’s actual or perceived race, color, religi<strong>on</strong>, nati<strong>on</strong>al origin, gender, sexualorientati<strong>on</strong>, gender identity, or disability. 1918 See United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 245-46 (2005) (declaring unc<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al the statute creating m<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>atoryGuidelines <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> holding Guidelines should <strong>on</strong>ly be applied in an advisory fashi<strong>on</strong> as <strong>on</strong>e of several factors to c<strong>on</strong>sider atsentencing); see also Gall v. United States, __ S. Ct. __, 2007 WL 4292116, at *7 (Dec. 10, 2007) (holding theGuidelines’ sentencing range is a starting point for determining a defendant’s sentence, but the district court should notpresume the range is reas<strong>on</strong>able). The factors the sentencing court must c<strong>on</strong>sider are enumerated in 18 U.S.C. §3553(a)(1)-(7).19 The Act breaks out “offenses involving actual or perceived race, color, religi<strong>on</strong>, or nati<strong>on</strong>al origin” <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> “offensesinvolving actual or perceived religi<strong>on</strong>, nati<strong>on</strong>al origin, gender, sexual orientati<strong>on</strong>, gender identity, or disability.” See,e.g., H.R. 1592, sec. 6(a)(1), (a)(2) (as approved by the House). In order to legitimize federal acti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> invoke federaljurisdicti<strong>on</strong>, the bill requires that offenses against individuals in the latter group have a relati<strong>on</strong>ship to interstate orforeign commerce, thereby implicating C<strong>on</strong>gress’s power to regulate under the Commerce Clause of the U.S.C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>. See H. Rep. No. 110-113 at 14-15 (2007) (explaining bill includes requirement of a nexus between crimes41
HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN STREET <strong>USA</strong>2008Like the 1968 Civil Rights Act, this legislati<strong>on</strong> would permit federal enforcement, but <strong>on</strong>ly ifa “certifying” federal official indicates there is “reas<strong>on</strong>able cause to believe the actual orperceived race, color, religi<strong>on</strong>, nati<strong>on</strong>al origin, gender, sexual orientati<strong>on</strong>, gender identity, ordisability” was a motivating factor underlying the defendant’s alleged c<strong>on</strong>duct; even then,federal prosecuti<strong>on</strong> is permitted <strong>on</strong>ly after the certifying federal official c<strong>on</strong>sults with state orlocal law enforcement <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> determines that the state has asked the federal government toassume jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>, has requested the federal government assume jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>, or that a priorstate prosecuti<strong>on</strong> has left “dem<strong>on</strong>strably unvindicated the Federal interest in eradicating biasmotivatedviolence.” 20The Local Law Enforcement <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hate</str<strong>on</strong>g> Crimes Preventi<strong>on</strong> Act would also authorize the AttorneyGeneral to provide n<strong>on</strong>-financial assistance, including technical, forensic, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> prosecutorialassistance, to state, local, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> tribal law enforcement to aid in investigati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> prosecuti<strong>on</strong> ofviolent fel<strong>on</strong>y crimes “motivated by prejudice based <strong>on</strong> actual or perceived race, color,religi<strong>on</strong>, nati<strong>on</strong>al origin, gender, sexual orientati<strong>on</strong>, gender identity, or disability of thevictim,” <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> would authorize $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2009 to providefederal grants of up to $100,000 per entity per year to state, local, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> tribal law enforcementfor investigating <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> prosecuting hate crimes. 21On April 29, 2009, the House passed the Local Law Enforcement <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hate</str<strong>on</strong>g> Crimes Preventi<strong>on</strong> Act,H.R.1913. This bill allows federal law to include crimes against people based <strong>on</strong> a pers<strong>on</strong>s’ gender,sexual orientati<strong>on</strong>, gender identity, or disability as a hate crime. The bill will improve the resourcesof state <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> local law enforcement agencies to prevent, investigate, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> prosecute hate crimes. 22On July 24, 2009, the U.S. Senate approved S. 1390, the Department of Defense Authorizati<strong>on</strong>legislati<strong>on</strong>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the vehicle for the Matthew Shepard <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hate</str<strong>on</strong>g> Crimes Preventi<strong>on</strong> Act (HCPA) by a voteof 87 to 7. The next step is a c<strong>on</strong>ference between the House <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Senate to rec<strong>on</strong>cile their differentversi<strong>on</strong>s of this legislati<strong>on</strong>.In 2009, H.R. 823, introduced by U.S. Rep. Carolyn Mal<strong>on</strong>ey of New York (D-NY), wouldof prejudice based <strong>on</strong> gender, gender identity, sexual orientati<strong>on</strong>, or disability <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>gress’s power to regulatecommerce in order to alleviate c<strong>on</strong>cerns about the provisi<strong>on</strong>’s c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>ality). The nexus between commerce <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>offenses based <strong>on</strong> race/color <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> interstate commerce is not required, however, because the Thirteenth Amendment tothe C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong> has been interpreted to explicitly authorize C<strong>on</strong>gress to regulate violence committed <strong>on</strong> this basis. SeeH. Rep. No. 110-113 at 14. Finally, religi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al origin are included in both groupings because, “to the extentthat there may be open questi<strong>on</strong>s regarding the precise c<strong>on</strong>tours of the range of circumstances under which theenforcement provisi<strong>on</strong> of the 13th amendment authorizes C<strong>on</strong>gress to criminalize hate crimes committed <strong>on</strong> the basis ofreligi<strong>on</strong> [<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al origin], the legislati<strong>on</strong> has included hate crimes based <strong>on</strong> religious beliefs [<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al origin] inboth secti<strong>on</strong>s.” Id. at 15 & n.21.20 See, e.g., H.R. 1592, sec. 6(b). “Certifying” federal officials are “the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General,the Associate Attorney General, or any Assistant Attorney General specially designated by the Attorney General.” Id.21 The n<strong>on</strong>-financial assistance porti<strong>on</strong> of the legislati<strong>on</strong> provides federal assistance not <strong>on</strong>ly for offenses that qualify ashate crimes under federal law, but also for crimes that are “a violati<strong>on</strong> of [] State, local, or Tribal hate crime laws.” See,e.g., H.R. 1592, sec. 3(a)(C) (as approved by the House). The potential incorporati<strong>on</strong> of this language into federal lawunderscores the importance of state- <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> local-level legislative acti<strong>on</strong>.22 H.R. 1913. The Local Law Enforcement Act, as introduced by John C<strong>on</strong>yers Jr [R-MI].42
- Page 1 and 2: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 3 and 4: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 5 and 6: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 7 and 8: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 9 and 10: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 11 and 12: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 13 and 14: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 15 and 16: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 17 and 18: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 19 and 20: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 21 and 22: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 23 and 24: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 25 and 26: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 27 and 28: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 29 and 30: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 31 and 32: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 33 and 34: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 35 and 36: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 37 and 38: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 39 and 40: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 41: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 45 and 46: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 47 and 48: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 49 and 50: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 51 and 52: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 53 and 54: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 55 and 56: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 57 and 58: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 59 and 60: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 61 and 62: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 63 and 64: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 65 and 66: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 67 and 68: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 69 and 70: OCTOBERHATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON
- Page 71 and 72: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 73 and 74: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 75 and 76: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 77 and 78: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 79 and 80: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 81 and 82: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 83 and 84: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 85 and 86: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 87 and 88: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 89 and 90: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 91 and 92: HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 93 and 94:
HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 95 and 96:
HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S
- Page 97 and 98:
HATE, VIOLENCE, AND DEATH ON MAIN S