02.12.2012 Views

LCA of an Ecolabeled Notebook - GreenDeltaTC

LCA of an Ecolabeled Notebook - GreenDeltaTC

LCA of an Ecolabeled Notebook - GreenDeltaTC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Goal <strong>an</strong>d Scope<br />

the frame <strong>of</strong> S-<strong>LCA</strong>, there exists basically only one endpoint category: hum<strong>an</strong> wellbeing.<br />

This minimises the utility <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> endpoint assessment.<br />

Impact Categories<br />

Considered impact categories for the social assessment are also based on the<br />

UNEP/SETAC guidelines for S-<strong>LCA</strong>. They are as follows:<br />

� Working conditions (WC)<br />

� Health <strong>an</strong>d safety (HS)<br />

� Hum<strong>an</strong> rights (HR)<br />

� Socio-economic repercussions (SER)<br />

� Indigenous rights including cultural heritage (IR)<br />

� Govern<strong>an</strong>ce (G)<br />

Classification<br />

Since there are no scientific based classification models <strong>of</strong> social LCI parameters <strong>an</strong><br />

own approach was developed. However, it is not possible to illustrate the cause-effectchains<br />

<strong>of</strong> every subcategory in the frame <strong>of</strong> the study.<br />

Rating Scale<br />

In S-<strong>LCA</strong> – in contrast to E-<strong>LCA</strong> studies – not only impacts shall be assessed, but also the<br />

perform<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> considered sectors <strong>an</strong>d comp<strong>an</strong>ies. Therefore the assessment is split<br />

into two phases: The first one assesses the perform<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> the sectors <strong>an</strong>d comp<strong>an</strong>ies<br />

respectively based on the status <strong>of</strong> the indicators taking the perform<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> the sector/comp<strong>an</strong>y<br />

in relation to the situation in the country/region into account. Of course,<br />

a comp<strong>an</strong>y c<strong>an</strong>not be blamed for low minimum wages, high unemployment rates, or<br />

underdeveloped infrastructure <strong>of</strong> a region, but it c<strong>an</strong> improve the situation trough fair<br />

wages, locally employed workers, or infrastructure projects.<br />

The second phase assesses the impacts <strong>of</strong> the comp<strong>an</strong>y/sector behaviour with regard<br />

to the selected impact categories.<br />

Each subcategory is assessed twice with a colour system r<strong>an</strong>ging from very good perform<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

to very poor perform<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>d very negative impacts to positive impacts (see<br />

table 11). The perform<strong>an</strong>ce assessment follows school grades.<br />

A specific factor is assigned to every colour to allow qu<strong>an</strong>tification <strong>of</strong> the impacts. The<br />

factors <strong>of</strong> all subcategories are summed up for every process <strong>an</strong>d the resulting<br />

amounts for the comp<strong>an</strong>y/sector perform<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>d for the impacts are divided by the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> subcategories to take missing ones due to unavailability <strong>of</strong> data into account.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!