12.07.2015 Views

Company Law 1 - University of Wolverhampton

Company Law 1 - University of Wolverhampton

Company Law 1 - University of Wolverhampton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Shuttleworth v Cox Bros & Co (Maidenhead) Ltd [1927] 2 KB 9 (CA)Wood v Odessa Waterworks Co (1889) 42 Ch D 636ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION – ALTERATION OF ARTICLESAllen v Gold Reefs <strong>of</strong> West Africa Ltd [1900] 1 Ch 656Andrews v Gas Meter <strong>Company</strong> Ltd [1897] 1 Ch 361Brown v British Abrasive Wheel Co [1919] 1 Ch 290Cane v Jones [1980] 1 WLR 1451; [1981] 1 All ER 533Clemens v Clemens Bros Ltd [1976] 2 All ER 268Cumbrian Newspapers Group Ltd v Cumberland and WestmorelandHerald Newspaper and Printing Co Ltd [1987] Ch 1; [1986] 2 All ER 816Dafen Tinplate Co Ltd v Llanelly Steel Co (1907) Ltd [1920] 2 Ch 124Eley v The Positive Government Security Life Assurance Co Ltd (1876) 1 Ex D 88Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Ltd [1951] Ch 286 (CA)Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheepbreeders’ Association [1915] 1 Ch 881House <strong>of</strong> Fraser plc v ACGE Investments Ltd and Others [1987] BCLC 478Northern Counties Securities Ltd v Jackson and Steeple Ltd [1974] 1 WLR 1133; [1974] 2 All ER625Northern Engineering Industries plc, Re [1994] BCC 618 (CA)Punt v Symons & Co Ltd [1903] 2 Ch 506Quinn & Axtens v Salmon [1909] AC 442Rights and Issues Investment Trust Ltd v Stylo Shoes Ltd [1964] 3 All ER 628Russell v Northern Bank Development Corporation Ltd [1992] 1 WLR 588 (HL); [1992] 3 All ER161 (HL)Shuttleworth v Cox Bros & Co (Maidenhead) Ltd [1927] 2 KB 9 (CA)Sidebotham v Kershaw, Leese & Co [1920] 1 Ch 154 (CA)Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw [1940] AC 701Companies Act 1985: ss2, 4, 6, 9, 14, 16, 17, 18, 42, 125, 126, 127 and 128Companies Act 1989: s110(2)Self-Study Questions1 Distinguish the memorandum from the articles.2 Does the s14 contract bind the members and the company?3 Does the s14 contract bind the members inter se?4 Can a company alter its objects by an ordinary resolution?5 What steps can a shareholder take if he wishes to prevent analteration to the objects clause becoming effective?Sample Questions1 Section 9 <strong>of</strong> the Companies Act 1985 permits a company to alter or add to its articles by specialresolution. What limitations, if any, does the law place on the exercise <strong>of</strong> this power?(<strong>Wolverhampton</strong> LLB by Distance Learning, September 2000, Question 5.)2 a In what ways and subject to what limitations may a company alter its articles <strong>of</strong> association? bPotter is the managing director <strong>of</strong> Ceramics Ltd and holds 25 per cent <strong>of</strong> the company’s shares.The articles <strong>of</strong> the company contain a clause appointing him director for life.The other directors <strong>of</strong> the company have discovered that Potter has not accounted for money receivedon the company’s behalf and is a major shareholder in a company which is directly in competitionwith Ceramics Ltd.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!