12.07.2015 Views

Company Law 1 - University of Wolverhampton

Company Law 1 - University of Wolverhampton

Company Law 1 - University of Wolverhampton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Study Unit 8 Suggested minimum study hours: 10TopicMaintenance <strong>of</strong> Share CapitalThis Unit covers material contained in the Learning Project.IntroductionIt is essential for a company to maintain its share capital for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the company, its membersand its creditors.Objectivesa To consider the rationale behind the rule that a company must not issue shares at a discountand how this has been weakened, if at all.Look at the provisions <strong>of</strong> ss99–116 CA 1985 and their effect on this principle.b To examine the principles which have evolved to ensure that a company’s capital is maintained.Consider the weaknesses in these principles and the effect <strong>of</strong> ss142–149 CA 1985.c To consider the provisions <strong>of</strong> ss151–158 CA 1985. Are the exceptions to the general principlesin s151 clear?Essential ReadingThese titles have been supplied as part <strong>of</strong> your study materials.<strong>Company</strong> <strong>Law</strong> by John Lowry and Alan Dignam OUP 2006Statutes on <strong>Company</strong> <strong>Law</strong> 2007-2008Cases and Materials on <strong>Company</strong> <strong>Law</strong> (Andrew Hicks and S Goo)General ReadingThese titles have not been supplied and are not essential reading, butyou may wish to refer to them to further your understanding.Gower and Davies: the Principles <strong>of</strong> Modern <strong>Company</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, Davies –Relevant Chapter(s)Case law and statutesAcatos and Hutcheson v Watson [1995] 1 BCLC 218Arab Bank plc v Mercantile Holdings Ltd and Another [1993] BCC 816Belmont Finance Corporation Ltd v Williams Furniture Ltd (No 2) [1980] 1 All ER 393Bradford Investments Ltd (No 2), Re [1991] BCC 379Brady v Brady [1989] AC 755Heald v O’Connor [1971] 1 WLR 497Henry Head and <strong>Company</strong> Limited v Ropner Holdings Limited [1952] Ch 124Holder’s Investment Trust Ltd, Re [1971] 1 WLR 583Ooregum Gold Mining <strong>Company</strong> <strong>of</strong> India v Roper [1892] AC 125Park Business Interiors Ltd v Park [1990] BCC 914

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!