Practice Question and SuggestedAnswerThe following test is designed for practice only and does NOT count aspart <strong>of</strong> the assessment regime. A Suggested Solution is, however,<strong>of</strong>fered in the following section. Students are advised not to consultthis solution until they have completed the test. It is expected that youwill return your answer to the College for marking and feedback.Unless you undertake such work you will not gain an insight into youracademic strengths and weaknesses before you attempt theexamination.Before attempting your answer, please ensure that you understandthe assessment criteria explained in the Award Guide, and theguidance contained in the section <strong>of</strong> the Module Planner headed ‘Skillsto be Developed and Examined’.QuestionBarnaby and Alexon are presently carrying on business in partnership. They are thinking aboutincorporating but are not sure about the different options which are available. They also need toknow what documentation is involved and what the quickest method <strong>of</strong> incorporation is. Theywould like to use the name ‘Big <strong>Company</strong>’ and also need to know in general whether there are anyrestrictions on the choice and use <strong>of</strong> a company name.Barnaby is to be issued with 100 £1 ordinary shares issued at nominal value and 500 ‘A’ preferenceshares to be issued at a premium <strong>of</strong> 50p per share. He would like to know what his maximumliability would be in the event <strong>of</strong> the company entering insolvent liquidation. Alexon wasrecently involved in the management <strong>of</strong> another company called Starlight Limited. Whilst she wasin the process <strong>of</strong> forming this company she sold some assets to the company at an inflated priceand also entered into contracts on behalf <strong>of</strong> the proposed company, which the board <strong>of</strong> Starlighthas since refused to adopt. Alexon believes that as she was never appointed as a director <strong>of</strong> thiscompany that there should be no problem. She is also angry that the board has refused to pay hercompany’s formation expenses. Advise Barnaby and Alexon.(<strong>Wolverhampton</strong>LLB by Distance Learning, May 2001, Question 2.)Suggested Answer to Practice QuestionNB: Do not consult this solution until you have completed the test.Outline Answer• Various types <strong>of</strong> companies and other types <strong>of</strong> business organisations.• Necessary documentation delivered to Registrar – memorandum, articles, statement <strong>of</strong> directorsand secretaries, statutorydeclaration.• Index <strong>of</strong> names.• Various statutory restrictions on names.• Common law restriction – tort <strong>of</strong> passing <strong>of</strong>f.• Maximum liability as shareholder – nominal value <strong>of</strong> shares.• Alexon – sale <strong>of</strong> assets by promoter.• Personal liability for prior incorporation contracts.• No claim for company’s formation expenses.Answer
Note: this answer is based on one written by a distance learning student covering the question setas part <strong>of</strong> an examination.There are a number <strong>of</strong> forms <strong>of</strong> business, one being the partnershipthey currently have, where the company has no legal personality andthe two partners are liable for debts. There is a limit <strong>of</strong> 20 partners ina partnership, with the exception <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional organisations.There is a limited partnership, where two partners must be liable,and the others have limited liability, again with no legal personality.There is a sole trader, who can carry on business as he wishes, butwith full liability.There is an unincorporated association, whose members (not morethan 20) have full liability.The Limited Liability Partnership Act 2000 was introduced, which will allow limited liability partnerships(LLPs) to be formed in 2001. This allows all the partners to have limited liability, and thepartnership has legal personality, although two partners are general associates, who deal with alladministration. Then there is the distinction between a private or public company. A public companyhas a minimum <strong>of</strong> £50,000 capital reserves and takes a while to get incorporated. A privatecompany can be unlimited, allowing secrecy <strong>of</strong> accounts, or limited (Ltd) either by guarantee (acertain limit will be stated as maximum liability) or by shares. If Barnaby is issued with 100 £1 ordinaryshares at nominal value and 500 ‘A’ preference shares at a premium <strong>of</strong> 50p, then the maximumliability would be the value <strong>of</strong> the shares he owns, plus any premium. If the shares are fullypaid, he will be liable to pay nothing extra. If the shares are partly paid (ie 25 per cent <strong>of</strong> the valueplus the premium) he would be liable for the amount not yet paid. The documents required to setup a company are elaborated in s10 CA 1985. These are the memorandum, stating the objects <strong>of</strong>the company, the name <strong>of</strong> the company and the registered <strong>of</strong>fice (s2). It must also include thenumber <strong>of</strong> shares and to whom they are issued. A copy <strong>of</strong> the company articles must be sent tothe Registrar, as well as a statement as to the first Director and Secretary <strong>of</strong> the company, Form10 and Form 12. The quickest method <strong>of</strong> incorporation would be to form a private company limitedby shares. Restrictions on a company name are covered by s26 CA 1985. Briefly, the name mustnot include the words Ltd or plc, except at the end, if it is a limited, or public limited, company. Thename must not be the same as an existing company, and it must not constitute a criminal <strong>of</strong>fenceor be <strong>of</strong>fensive.Alexon appears to have been a promoter <strong>of</strong> Starlight, and as such, when she sold assets to Starlightat an inflated price, these were secret pr<strong>of</strong>its. Whilst secret pr<strong>of</strong>its can be made, they must bedisclosed to all members <strong>of</strong> the company, perhaps by way <strong>of</strong> a prospectus, otherwise the pr<strong>of</strong>itscan be claimed back from Alexon: see Gluckstein v Barnes (1900). Alexon entered into contractson behalf <strong>of</strong> Starlight, and whether she is a Director or not, she will be liable. Formation expensesare between her and the company. The company cannot enter into a contract, because it does notexist, and a further contract, ratified, could only be done under deed. Normally a promoter will alsobe a Director and this problem would not arise. The only other course would be to look atStarlight’s articles, to see if anything is there that would assist Alexon.Marker’s comment on Student AnswerA well written, competent answer which deserved an Upper Second award. Additional detail regardingthe name <strong>of</strong> the company would have enhanced the answer.