12.07.2015 Views

Company Law 1 - University of Wolverhampton

Company Law 1 - University of Wolverhampton

Company Law 1 - University of Wolverhampton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Practice Question and SuggestedAnswerThe following test is designed for practice only and does NOT count aspart <strong>of</strong> the assessment regime. A Suggested Solution is, however,<strong>of</strong>fered in the following section. Students are advised not to consultthis solution until they have completed the test. It is expected that youwill return your answer to the College for marking and feedback.Unless you undertake such work you will not gain an insight into youracademic strengths and weaknesses before you attempt theexamination.Before attempting your answer, please ensure that you understandthe assessment criteria explained in the Award Guide, and theguidance contained in the section <strong>of</strong> the Module Planner headed ‘Skillsto be Developed and Examined’.QuestionBarnaby and Alexon are presently carrying on business in partnership. They are thinking aboutincorporating but are not sure about the different options which are available. They also need toknow what documentation is involved and what the quickest method <strong>of</strong> incorporation is. Theywould like to use the name ‘Big <strong>Company</strong>’ and also need to know in general whether there are anyrestrictions on the choice and use <strong>of</strong> a company name.Barnaby is to be issued with 100 £1 ordinary shares issued at nominal value and 500 ‘A’ preferenceshares to be issued at a premium <strong>of</strong> 50p per share. He would like to know what his maximumliability would be in the event <strong>of</strong> the company entering insolvent liquidation. Alexon wasrecently involved in the management <strong>of</strong> another company called Starlight Limited. Whilst she wasin the process <strong>of</strong> forming this company she sold some assets to the company at an inflated priceand also entered into contracts on behalf <strong>of</strong> the proposed company, which the board <strong>of</strong> Starlighthas since refused to adopt. Alexon believes that as she was never appointed as a director <strong>of</strong> thiscompany that there should be no problem. She is also angry that the board has refused to pay hercompany’s formation expenses. Advise Barnaby and Alexon.(<strong>Wolverhampton</strong>LLB by Distance Learning, May 2001, Question 2.)Suggested Answer to Practice QuestionNB: Do not consult this solution until you have completed the test.Outline Answer• Various types <strong>of</strong> companies and other types <strong>of</strong> business organisations.• Necessary documentation delivered to Registrar – memorandum, articles, statement <strong>of</strong> directorsand secretaries, statutorydeclaration.• Index <strong>of</strong> names.• Various statutory restrictions on names.• Common law restriction – tort <strong>of</strong> passing <strong>of</strong>f.• Maximum liability as shareholder – nominal value <strong>of</strong> shares.• Alexon – sale <strong>of</strong> assets by promoter.• Personal liability for prior incorporation contracts.• No claim for company’s formation expenses.Answer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!