02.12.2012 Views

SvO2 = SaO2

SvO2 = SaO2

SvO2 = SaO2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Risk adapted peri – operative haemodynamic management<br />

Clinical relevance of<br />

perioperative ScvO 2 monitoring<br />

___________________________________________<br />

Euroanaesthesia 2007 Meeting<br />

Munich, Germany, 9.-12. June 2007<br />

Claus-Georg KRENN<br />

Dept. of Anaesthesia and General Intensive Care, University Vienna<br />

claus.krenn@meduniwien.ac.at


standard hemodynamic monitoring<br />

___________________________________________________<br />

31 of 36 medical shock<br />

patients:<br />

– resuscitated to normal<br />

MAP and CVP<br />

– have global tissue hypoxia<br />

(Scv02 < 70% ) and<br />

– lactate >2 mmol/L<br />

Rady, AJEM 1994


Rady, AJEM 1994<br />

MAP<br />

[mmHg]<br />

180<br />

150<br />

120<br />

90<br />

60<br />

30<br />

Standard hemodynamic monitoring<br />

might be not enough<br />

to assess tissue oxygenation in<br />

patients at risk !!!<br />

n= 1232<br />

DO2 ml*m-2 *min-1 100 300 500 700 900 1100


Für die Entwicklung der Lehre vom Kreislauf war es gewiss<br />

ein Verhängnis, dass das Stromvolumen verhältnismäßig so<br />

umständlich, der Blutdruck aber gar so leicht bestimmbar ist -<br />

deshalb gewann das Blutdruckmanometer einen geradezu<br />

faszinierenden Einfluss, obwohl die meisten Organe gar<br />

nicht Druck, sondern Stromvolumen brauchen.<br />

A. Jarisch<br />

„Kreislauffragen“ ; 1928


The conventionally measured variables such as bl od<br />

pressure, heart rate and urine output were of little<br />

prognostic value.<br />

Only variables related to volume and flow<br />

(blood volume, cardiac output, oxygen delivery and consumption)<br />

had a significant prognostic value.<br />

W. C. Shoemaker 1979


Macrohemodynamics<br />

═<br />

regional blood flow


Macrohemodynamics<br />

═<br />

regional blood flow


Macrohemodynamics<br />

═<br />

regional blood flow<br />

need for a relieable clinically applicable and<br />

useful indicator of adequate tissue oxygenation


Macrohemodynamics<br />

═<br />

regional blood flow<br />

need for a relieable clinically applicable and<br />

useful indicator of adequate tissue oxygenation<br />

monitoring should be dynamic -<br />

interventions immediately affect parameter


physiologic key question of oxygen transport<br />

___ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __<br />

… adequacy or mismatch


the controversy of increasing O 2 transport<br />

___________________________________________________________<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

-10<br />

-15<br />

-20<br />

-25<br />

-30<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 16 20 24<br />

„goal directed therapy“<br />

GDT<br />

… increase O 2 delivery to (supra)normal values !!!<br />

WC Shoemaker et al. 1973, Arch Surg 106


the controversy of increasing O 2 transport<br />

____________________________________________________<br />

Hayes et al., N Engl J Med 1994


ScvO 2<br />

___ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ ___<br />

VO 2 DO 2 DO 2 VO 2<br />

Stress PaO 2 PaO 2 Anesthesia<br />

Pain Hb Hb Hypothermia<br />

Shivering CO CO<br />

Fever Hypovolemia


Oxygen delivery (DO 2)<br />

______________________________<br />

1) not necessarily increases<br />

oxygen consumption<br />

2) why not measure<br />

oxygen consumption ?<br />

3) use mixed venous oxygen<br />

satturation as marker<br />

of oxygen consumption<br />

SvO 2


Meta – analysis of hemodynamic optimization<br />

________________________________________________________________


Meta – analysis of hemodynamic optimization<br />

___________________________________________________________


from SvO 2 to mixed central venous O 2 satturation<br />

___________________________________________________________________<br />

.<br />

ScvO 2<br />

SvO 2


from SvO 2 to mixed central venous O 2 satturation<br />

___________________________________________________________________<br />

.<br />

V. cava sup.<br />

- before the<br />

right heart<br />

ScvO 2<br />

SvO 2


early goal directed therapy<br />

___ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _<br />

E. Rivers et al.;<br />

N Engl J Med 2001


early goal directed therapy<br />

___ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _


early goal directed therapy<br />

___ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _<br />

E. Rivers et al.;<br />

N Engl J Med 2001


ScvO 2 - continuous measurments<br />

_________________________________________________<br />

continuous fiberoptic<br />

venous oxymetry


ScvO 2 - continuous measurments<br />

_________________________________________________


is ScvO 2 a valuable parameter for monitoring ?<br />

_________________________________________________________<br />

� in all patients ?<br />

� in all clinical<br />

situations ?<br />

� without endangering<br />

by itself ?<br />

� with impact on<br />

prognosis ?


ScvO 2 in critically ill patients<br />

___ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ ___<br />

� 61 patients, paired measurment on admission<br />

� correlation coefficient 0.945<br />

� both parameters are closely related and<br />

interchangeable for the first evaluation<br />

Ladakis et al. Respiration 2001:68


ScvO 2 in critically ill patients<br />

_____________________________________________<br />

� continuously measured in high-risk patients,<br />

paired measurment<br />

Reinhart et al. ICM 2004: 30


ScvO 2<br />

___ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ ___<br />

� was unaffected by changes in<br />

physiologic variables (pH, temp., a.s.o.)<br />

� averaged 7 ± 4 % higher<br />

� paralleled SvO 2 in more than 90%<br />

� correlation coeff. r = 0.96


ScvO 2 in septic shock patients<br />

___ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __<br />

� 16 patients, paired measurments over 24 h<br />

Varpula et al., ICM 2006; 32:1336


ScvO 2<br />

___ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ ___<br />

� difference between SvO 2 and ScvO 2<br />

varies considerably over time<br />

� ScvO 2 being higher at all TP<br />

� ScvO 2 inadequate tool to estimate the<br />

flow-weighted oxygen balance of the whole<br />

body (SvO 2 )<br />

� but accurately reflects hypovolemia


ScvO 2 in critically ill patients<br />

______________________________________________<br />

� 53 patients, surgical and medical<br />

� calculating VO 2 on basis of ScvO 2 produced<br />

unaccaptable large errors<br />

� difference might be attributed to mixing with<br />

coronary sinus blood<br />

Chawla et al., CHEST 2004:126


ScvO 2 in perioperative patients at risk<br />

__________________________________________________<br />

� Morbidity<br />

� Increased length of hospital stay<br />

� Mortality


high risk patients<br />

__________________________________<br />

� Emergency abdominal aortic surgery<br />

� Trauma, such as fractured neck of femur<br />

� Neurological<br />

� Cardiovascular<br />

� severe valvular heart disease<br />

� aortic dissection<br />

� Gastrointestinal<br />

� Colon resection<br />

� large and small bowel obstruction<br />

� Pancreatic surgery


Reason for being high risk<br />

________________________________________<br />

� Co-morbidity<br />

� elderly patients with significant medical problems<br />

� Type of surgery<br />

� often long procedure with significant blood loss<br />

fluid shift, electrolyte and nutritional problems<br />

and possibility of post-op pain (effects breathing)<br />

� abdominal surgery is associated with physiological<br />

stress response<br />

� Emergency or elective<br />

� Patients who present with urgent emergency<br />

cases have worse outcomes


ScvO 2<br />

___ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ ___<br />

� fluctuations occur in the post-op period<br />

� not only associated with DO 2 but also<br />

related to oxygen consumption<br />

� ScvO 2 changes are independently<br />

associated with postoperative complications<br />

ScvO 2 lowest value (cut off 64 %) was<br />

significantly lower in patients who<br />

developed complications


• absolute values<br />

differed unaccaptable<br />

r = 0.76<br />

• however the trend was<br />

clinically acceptable as<br />

substitute of SvO 2


ScvO 2 in cardiac surgical patients<br />

___ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _<br />

� 60 patients, 5 TP, 300 paired measurments<br />

Sander et al. ICM 2007


ScvO 2<br />

___ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ ___<br />

� weak correlation over all measurments<br />

� more pronounced association in<br />

values below 70%<br />

� attributed to increase of oxygen extraction<br />

rate of splanchnic circulation in the course of<br />

ACBP crafting<br />

� ScvO 2 might overestimate SvO 2<br />

� thus only high values can exclude tissue hypoxia


� Goal directed therapy – setting ,<br />

aiming at adequate DO 2 by improving CO<br />

(stroke volume optimization) by<br />

fluid and catecholamine administration<br />

� resulted in reduced mortality and HLoS


ScvO 2<br />

___ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ ___<br />

� reflects the degree of oxygen extraction<br />

from the upper part of the body including<br />

the brain<br />

� values are slightly higher than SvO 2<br />

� difference to SvO 2 might vary with<br />

cardiovascular insufficiency<br />

� thus in case of low SvO 2 it should not be<br />

used alone but in combination with other<br />

markers


Nguyen et al., Crit Care Med 2007, 35


… perfusion –<br />

deficit ?<br />

practical aproach ?<br />

________________________________<br />

advanced<br />

monitoring<br />

global or regional<br />

problem ?<br />

S cvO 2 ? EGDT


Conclusion ScvO 2 - monitoring<br />

_______________________________________<br />

� identify high risk patients and implement<br />

ScvO 2 monitoring early - as easy as with<br />

insertion of the central venous catheter


Conclusion ScvO 2 - monitoring<br />

_______________________________________<br />

� implement early in high risk patients<br />

� check signs of reduced tissue perfusion<br />

s.a.: complete hemodynamic evaluation<br />

(CO, stroke volume ~ variation, GEDV,<br />

lactate, PDR of ICG, diuresis)


Conclusion ScvO 2 - monitoring<br />

_______________________________________<br />

� implement early in high risk patients<br />

� check signs of reduced tissue perfusion<br />

� rely on the course targeting your<br />

hemodynamic goals which in almost all cases<br />

mirrors the course of SvO 2


Conclusion ScvO 2 - monitoring<br />

_______________________________________<br />

� implement early in high risk patients<br />

� check signs of reduced tissue perfusion<br />

� rely on the course<br />

� treat according to a standardized algorythm<br />

aiming at adequate (regional) perfusion


focus on : „early and goal directed“<br />

___________________________________________________________________________


Gemischtvenöse Sättigung <strong>SvO2</strong><br />

• <strong>SvO2</strong> = <strong>SaO2</strong> – VO2<br />

folgt aus der Umwandlung von<br />

• VO2 = CO × (CaO2 – CvO2)<br />

Sauerstoffverbrauch berechnet<br />

CO ⋅ Hb ⋅ 1,34


ScvO 2<br />

___ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ ___<br />

� adequately reflects hypovolemia<br />

� only high values [ ›70%] can exclude<br />

inadequate oxygen delivery<br />

� is no general estimate of SvO 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!