12.07.2015 Views

View the pdf - Australian Army

View the pdf - Australian Army

View the pdf - Australian Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

That is 60 men <strong>the</strong>y will never see again unless of course we all go back within <strong>the</strong> nextcouple of months. Old Doc Carrington went from <strong>the</strong> sec[tion]. I think he has 50 odddays leave due and all <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs have <strong>the</strong> same so <strong>the</strong>y will not come back till <strong>the</strong>y have<strong>the</strong>ir leave, even if it means going AWL [absent without leave].214This issue was to play a part in <strong>the</strong> last major incident in <strong>the</strong> battalion’s history.When Field was finally advised, in <strong>the</strong> second week of May, that Dexter woulddefinitely not be returning, he requested Lieutenant Colonel Terence Farrell as hisreplacement.215 Farrell arrived from Australia on 30 May, and in July Field noted‘I’m satisfied that he will bring 61 Bn up to <strong>the</strong> old standards again’.216 However,when <strong>the</strong> battalion was again ordered to assume responsibility for rear-areasecurity in <strong>the</strong> south on 7 August, more than seventy members of <strong>the</strong> battalionrefused to move. Field recorded that ‘They are nursing a grievance about leave andpossibly think that <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> war is imminent’.217 Farrell was sent back from<strong>the</strong> south to sort <strong>the</strong> problem out. Brigadier Field noted that Farrell was ‘unableto effect any change in <strong>the</strong> attitude of <strong>the</strong> 70 men who had refused duty. Chargeswere accordingly being drawn up. This is a poor finish and a stain on <strong>the</strong> nameof <strong>the</strong> 61 Bn’.218 It also suggested that not all of <strong>the</strong> problems within <strong>the</strong> battalionwere of Dexter’s making.214 Ewen’s diary 2, 28 April 1945, AWM PR89/190. There were similar sentiments in <strong>the</strong>9th Battalion. Mat<strong>the</strong>ws diary 16, 2 and 4 May 1945, AWM PR89/079, Item 5.215 Field’s diary, 11 May 1945, AWM 3DRL6937, Item 7.216 Field’s diary, 11 July 1945, AWM 3DRL6937, Item 7.217 Field’s diary, 9 August 1945, AWM 3DRL6937, Item 7. This incident is also covered inEwen’s diary and <strong>the</strong> II Corps report on operations in <strong>the</strong> Solomons. The numbers varybetween 70–76 personnel, depending on <strong>the</strong> source. Ewen was one of <strong>the</strong> dissentersand received eighteen months field punishment, although he only served threemonths. His explanation was, ‘It’s a long story of Bad <strong>Army</strong> Adm. All <strong>the</strong> officers hadleave and half <strong>the</strong> Bn were on leave when we were ordered back up’. The corps reportnoted ‘This instance of ill-discipline was isolated and directly attributable to failureof troops to get leave which <strong>the</strong>y had been expecting’. Ewen’s diary 2, 7 January 1946,AWM PR89/190; ‘Report on Operational and Administrative Activities 2 Aust Corpsin <strong>the</strong> North Solomons Area October 1944–August 1945’, p. 79, AWM 3DRL6643,Item 3/83.218 Field’s diary, 10 August 1945, AWM 3DRL6937, Item 7.A tale of three battalions — 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!