12.07.2015 Views

The Independence of Right from Ethics Allen Wood Right and ethics ...

The Independence of Right from Ethics Allen Wood Right and ethics ...

The Independence of Right from Ethics Allen Wood Right and ethics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

themselves -- such as gods, or robots. For in order to serve the ends <strong>of</strong> human beings, even godswould have to be prayed to, <strong>and</strong> robots would have to be programmed <strong>and</strong> comm<strong>and</strong>ed (if onlyby a remote control device); these actions <strong>of</strong> praying or comm<strong>and</strong>ing would have to be freelychosen as means to the ends the human beings have freely set. Another way <strong>of</strong> putting it is this:Human beings have the privilege -- or, if you prefer, they are subject to the curse (Kantrecognizes that it can be viewed in both ways) -- that whatever good they achieve, <strong>and</strong> whateverhappiness they enjoy, must be the result <strong>of</strong> their own work: it must arise <strong>from</strong> their setting an end<strong>and</strong> their selecting, or perhaps inventing, the means necessary to achieve it, <strong>and</strong> then applying themeans through actions chosen by the human being as such means (cf. I 8:19-20, MA 8:111-112).It follows that as a rational being, I necessarily will in general, <strong>and</strong> as far as possible(consistent with other dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> reason) that the actions I perform should serve ends I have set,rather than serving different ends, ends set by others. This is a necessary dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> rationalagency, part <strong>of</strong> its essential structure. It is also a dem<strong>and</strong> entirely independent <strong>of</strong> whateverparticular ends I may have, or even the ends I ought to have. Moreover, I recognize that otherrational beings necessarily have exactly the same rational interest that I do in choosing theiractions to further their own freely chosen ends, rather than having their actions constrained topromote ends chosen by others. To recognize a being – whether oneself or another -- as a rationalagent is to view it as lying under the indispensable rational necessity that it wills to be free, as faras possible, consistent with other dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> reason, to pursue its own ends rather than beingforced to have its actions serve the ends set by others without its freely given co-operation orconsent.My dem<strong>and</strong> to be externally free is therefore qualified by the dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> reason that othershave the same rational claim on external freedom that I do. No one’s external freedom can7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!