10 - University of Leicester

More documents

Recommendations

Info

10Appendix CBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Education 2008Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the assessed development islocated in a zone defined as having a low annual probability of flooding.Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the assessed development islocated in a zone defined as having a low annual probability of flooding.Pol 5Flood riskOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the assessed development is One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the assessed development islocated in a zone defined as having a medium or high annual probability of flooding ANlocated in a zone defined as having a medium or high annual probability of flooding ANthe ground level of the building, car parking and access is above the design flood level the ground level of the building, car parking and access is above the design flood levelfor the site’s location.for the site’s location.3 3 - - - - -One further credit where evidence provided demonstrates that surface water run-off One further credit where evidence provided demonstrates that surface water run-offattenuation measures are specified to minimise the risk of localised flooding, resulting attenuation measures are specified to minimise the risk of localised flooding, resultingfrom a loss of flood storage on site due to development.from a loss of flood storage on site due to development.Pol 6Minimising watercourse pollutionOne credit here evidence provided demonstrates that effective on site treatment suchas Sustainable Drainage Systems (SUDs) or oil separators have been specified inareas that are or could be a source of watercourse pollution.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that effective on site treatment suchas Sustainable Drainage Systems (SUDs) or oil separators have been specified inareas that are or could be a source of watercourse pollution.1 1 - - - - -Pol 7Reduction of Night Time LightPollutionOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the external lighting design is in One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the external lighting design is incompliance with the guidance in the Institution of Lighting Engineers (ILE) Guidance compliance with the guidance in the Institution of Lighting Engineers (ILE) Guidancenotes for the reduction of obtrusive light, 2005.notes for the reduction of obtrusive light, 2005.1 1 - - - - -Pol 8Noise AttenuationOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that new sources of noise from thedevelopment do not give rise to the likelihood of complaints from existing noise-sensitipremises and amenity or wildlife areas that are within the locality of the site.N/A 1 1 - - - - -Where non-hazardous construction waste generated by the building’s development Where non-hazardous construction waste generated by the building’s developmentmeets or exceeds the resource efficiency benchmark required to achieve three credits meets or exceeds the resource efficiency benchmark required to achieve three credits(as outlined in the guidance).(as outlined in the guidance).InnovationWst 1 Construction Site WasteManagementWhere at least 90% by weight (80% by volume) of non-hazardous construction wasteand 95% of demolition waste by weight (85% by volume) (if applicable) generated bythe buildhas been diverted from landfill and either:a. Reused on site (in-situ or for new applications)b. Reused on other sitesc. Salvaged/reclaimed for reused. Returned to the supplier via a ‘take-back’ schemee. Recovered from site by an approved waste management contractor and recycled.Where at least 90% by weight (80% by volume) of non-hazardous construction wasteand 95% of demolition waste by weight (85% by volume) (if applicable) generated bythe buildhas been diverted from landfill and either:a. Reused on site (in-situ or for new applications)b. Reused on other sitesc. Salvaged/reclaimed for reused. Returned to the supplier via a ‘take-back’ schemee. Recovered from site by an approved waste management contractor and recycled.1 0Where all key waste groups are identified for diversion from landfill at pre-constructionstage SWMP.Where all key waste groups are identified for diversion from landfill at pre-constructionstage SWMP.Innovation - BREEAM Accredited Professional or Suitably Qualified BREEAM AssessorInnovationBREEAM Accredited Professional /Suitably Qualified AssessorUp to two credits are available for the comprehensive use of a BREEAM AccreditedProfessional (AP) or Suitably Qualified BREEAM Assessor (SQA) throughout projectwork stages.Up to two credits are available for the comprehensive use of a BREEAM AccreditedProfessional (AP) or Suitably Qualified BREEAM Assessor (SQA) throughout projectwork stages.2 2Innovation - BRE Global Approved Innovation creditsInnovationApproved InnovationsAdditional BREEAM Innovation Credits can be awareded where an application is made Additional BREEAM Innovation Credits can be awareded where an application is madeto, and approved by the BREEAM office using the Innovation Application Form and the to, and approved by the BREEAM office using the Innovation Application Form and theassessor confirms compliance with the criteria set out within the Innovation Application assessor confirms compliance with the criteria set out within the Innovation ApplicationForm.Form.© architects design partnership llp Page 76
ManagementHealth &WellbeingEnergyTransportWaterMaterialsWasteLand Use & EcologyPollutionInnovation10Appendix DBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Multi Residential© architects design partnership llp Page 77BREEAM Scheme: BREEAM Multi-residential 2008Pass 30%Building Name: Freeman's Common Student ResidencesGood 45%BREEAM Registration No.: 0Very Good 55%BREEAM Assessor: 0Excellent 70%Licensed Assessor organisation: ADPOutstanding 85%Stage of AssessmentInterim - Design StageRating Level Pass Good Very Good Excellent OutstandingMinimum Standards Achieved YES YES YES YES NOEnvironmentalweightingBREEAM Score78.32%Minimum BREEAM StandardsBuilding Performance by SectionBREEAM RatingEXCELLENTCredits available Credits achieved % Achieved Weighted ScoreManagement 12.00% 12.00 12.00 100.00% 12.00%Health & Wellbeing 15.00% 17.00 14.00 82.35% 12.35%Energy 19.00% 23.00 16.00 69.57% 13.22%Transport 8.00% 9.00 7.00 77.78% 6.22%Water 6.00% 8.00 8.00 100.00% 6.00%Materials 12.50% 17.00 10.00 58.82% 7.35%Waste 7.50% 8.00 6.00 75.00% 5.63%Land Use & Ecology 10.00% 10.00 8.00 80.00% 8.00%Pollution 10.00% 11.00 5.00 45.45% 4.55%Innovation 10.00% 10.00 3.00 30.00% 3.00%Total BREEAM Score 78.32%Assessed Building's BREEAM Performance by Section20%18%16%14%Management 12% 12%Health &Wellbeing 15% 12%Energy 19% 13%Transport 8% 6%Water 6% 6%Materials 13% 7%Waste 8% 6%Land Use & Ecology 10% 8%Pollution 10% 5%Innovation 10% 3%12%10%8%6%4%2%0%Score Available Score Achieved
Page 2 and 3:
© architects design partnership ll
Page 4 and 5:
01 Introduction
Page 6 and 7:
01IntroductionUrban MorphologyThe M
Page 8 and 9:
02 Design Overview
Page 10:
02Design Overview02.1 Design concep
Page 14 and 15:
02Design Concept_The DesignOutline
Page 16 and 17:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 22:
Page 27 and 28: 02Planning02.3 Planning02.31 Leices
Page 29: 03 Architectural Assessment
Page 32 and 33: 03Architectural Assessment03.9 Land
Page 34 and 35: 04 Environmental & BREEAM Assessmen
Page 36 and 37: 04Environmental & BREEAM Assessment
Page 43 and 44: 05Civil & Structural AssessmentThe
Page 45 and 46: © architects design partnership ll
Page 47 and 48: 06Mechanical & Electrical Assesseme
Page 49 and 50: 06Mechanical & Electrical Assesseme
Page 51 and 52: 07 Cost Report
Page 53 and 54: 07Cost Report07.4.3 Assumptions and
Page 55 and 56: 07Cost Report07.8.1 Option A07.8.3
Page 57 and 58: 08CDM Elements08.1 IntroductionEC H
Page 59 and 60: 09 Summary
Page 61 and 62: 10 Appendices
Page 63 and 64: This plan is reproduced from or bas
Page 65 and 66: ManagementHealth &WellbeingEnergyTr
Page 67 and 68: 10Appendix CBREEAM Pre-Assessment -
Page 73: 10Appendix CBREEAM Pre-Assessment -
Page 77 and 78: 10Appendix DBREEAM Pre-Assessment -
show all

10 - University of Leicester

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?