12.07.2015 Views

Mass transfer with complex chemical reaction in gas—liquid ... - ITM

Mass transfer with complex chemical reaction in gas—liquid ... - ITM

Mass transfer with complex chemical reaction in gas—liquid ... - ITM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

R.D. Vas Bhat et al./Chemical Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Science 54 (1999) 121—136 127Fig. 2. Effect of K on enhancement factor. Consecutive (irr)—(rev) <strong>reaction</strong>.<strong>with</strong> the presently obta<strong>in</strong>ed numerical results forlow Hatta numbers (Ha(3). A maximum deviation of5.8% was seen for the lowest Hatta number (Ha"1)while for higher Hatta numbers the agreement was muchbetter.4.2. First <strong>reaction</strong> irreversible—second <strong>reaction</strong> reversibleThe results from the simulation for the above case aregiven <strong>in</strong> Fig. 2 for K "10. As may be observed, the<strong>in</strong>itial part of the curve is similar to a second orderirreversible <strong>reaction</strong> and can be described <strong>with</strong> availabletechniques (e.g. DeCoursey, 1974) till the curve reachesthe <strong>in</strong>termediate asymptotic enhancement value. For thecase of equal diffusivities, the value of E correspondsto the quantity (1# B /A ). As Ha <strong>in</strong>creases further, thefirst <strong>reaction</strong> becomes <strong>in</strong>stantaneous <strong>with</strong> respect to mass<strong>transfer</strong> so that, now, further enhancement is essentiallyprovided by the second <strong>reaction</strong>.4.2.1. Effect of K From Fig. 2 it is clear that the value of K <strong>in</strong>fluencesthe f<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite enhancement factor. For very lowK (typically(10) practically no further enhancementis provided by the second <strong>reaction</strong>. This is obvious as atsuch low K , the net production of E and F is very low;the effect of the forward <strong>reaction</strong> <strong>reaction</strong> (1c) is overruledby the comparatively fast backward <strong>reaction</strong> of<strong>reaction</strong> (1c) result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> negligible additional absorptionof A. With an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> K , the rate of the forward<strong>reaction</strong> (1c) <strong>in</strong>creases, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> greater absorption ofA and a higher enhancement factor. However, the valueof E cannot exceed the value for the case where both<strong>reaction</strong>s are irreversible (8). This corresponds to a valueof E "9 for the <strong>in</strong>itial concentrations used <strong>in</strong> the simulationspresented <strong>in</strong> Fig. 2.4.2.2. F<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite enhancement factor, E It is observed that the f<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite enhancementfactor, E , can be described by the follow<strong>in</strong>gequation:E "E #E !1 (12)where E and E are the contributions of <strong>reaction</strong>s(1b) and (1c) to the f<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite enhancement factor. Forirreversible <strong>chemical</strong> <strong>reaction</strong> and equal reactant diffusivities,E is given byE "1# B A . (13)The value of E may be obta<strong>in</strong>ed from standard techniquesfor <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite enhancement factors for s<strong>in</strong>gle reversible<strong>reaction</strong>s (e.g. DeCoursey and Thr<strong>in</strong>g, 1989; Secorand Beutler, 1967). However, <strong>in</strong> order to use these techniques,the value of the <strong>in</strong>itial concentration of the <strong>in</strong>termediateC is required. S<strong>in</strong>ce at these Hatta numbers, Eq.(1b) is <strong>in</strong>stantaneous <strong>with</strong> respect to mass <strong>transfer</strong>, it canbe assumed that all B present <strong>in</strong>itially is completelyconverted to C. In other words, one may assume thatthe <strong>in</strong>itial concentration of C is the same as the <strong>in</strong>itialconcentration of B. Table 3 compares the approximatef<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite enhancement factor from Eq. (12) tothose obta<strong>in</strong>ed numerically. The DeCoursey and Thr<strong>in</strong>g(1989) technique has been used for evaluat<strong>in</strong>g E .As can be observed, the differences <strong>in</strong> the values arenegligible.4.3. First <strong>reaction</strong> reversible—second <strong>reaction</strong> irreversibleThe results for the above case are presented <strong>in</strong> Fig.3 for K "10. The results may be expla<strong>in</strong>ed on thebasis of the follow<strong>in</strong>g parameters:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!