13.07.2015 Views

AP Literature and Composition! - Hunterdon Central Regional High ...

AP Literature and Composition! - Hunterdon Central Regional High ...

AP Literature and Composition! - Hunterdon Central Regional High ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Assignment #1 Notebooks will be assessed using the following rubric:“A” Range • Deep <strong>and</strong> broad underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the entire work• Analysis is mature, specific <strong>and</strong> original• Insight that recognizes <strong>and</strong> appreciates what most students miss• <strong>Composition</strong> reflects exemplary comm<strong>and</strong> of language, style <strong>and</strong>usage• Ample <strong>and</strong> revealing textual evidence• Categories demonstrate appropriately balanced development“B” Range • Adequate underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the work <strong>and</strong> its complexities• Analysis is specific but limited or inexact in total scope• Insight that recognizes what some students miss• <strong>Composition</strong> reflects strong comm<strong>and</strong> of language, style <strong>and</strong> usage,but may be uneven throughout• Adequate <strong>and</strong> obvious textual support• Categories demonstrate some imbalance in development <strong>and</strong> depth“C” Range • Superficial <strong>and</strong> general underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the work as a whole• Analysis is limited, inexact <strong>and</strong> vague, tending toward summary• Insight that recognizes easily identifiable points with littleelaboration• <strong>Composition</strong> reveals errors in basic comm<strong>and</strong> of language, style<strong>and</strong> usage• General references to the text with little direct quotation, orirrelevant references• Categories are limited <strong>and</strong>/or imbalanced in development <strong>and</strong> depth“D” Range • Little or partial underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the work as a whole• Summary with scant analysis• Vague insight relying on generalizations• <strong>Composition</strong> reveals glaring <strong>and</strong> repeated errors that distract thereader• General references to the text with little direct quotation, orirrelevant references• Categories are limited <strong>and</strong>/or imbalanced in development <strong>and</strong>depth. One or more categories may be missing“F” Range • Clear indication that the work was only partially read or not read atall• Cursory summary• Vague <strong>and</strong> incomprehensible commentary• <strong>Composition</strong> reveals glaring <strong>and</strong> repeated errors that make meaningunintelligible• Vague reference to the text with no direct quotation• Categories are severely underdeveloped. One or more categories ismissing.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!