13.07.2015 Views

Update on Principle Based Reserving - Actuary.com

Update on Principle Based Reserving - Actuary.com

Update on Principle Based Reserving - Actuary.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6/2/2012Net Premium Reserve (NPR) Method• ACLI reported more work is needed for the NPR methodologyfor universal life insurance products with sec<strong>on</strong>dary guarantees(ULSG). <strong>Based</strong> <strong>on</strong> the PBR study and input from member<strong>com</strong>panies the ULSG NPR was difficult to apply in some casesand results were not as expected.• Given the short period of time prior to a targeted June LATFadopti<strong>on</strong>, ACLI will have up to weekly status calls to help LATFbe up to speed when the final ULSG NPR is submitted.SEAC Spring C<strong>on</strong>ferenceCopyright © 2012 by the American Academy of ActuariesAll Rights Reserved. 11Mortality Development in VM-20• Feedback from NAIC Impact Study was that mortalityassumpti<strong>on</strong> was <strong>com</strong>plex and difficult to implement.• The Academy submitted a proposal to address c<strong>on</strong>cerns that theVM-20 mortality development was too c<strong>on</strong>fusing, <strong>com</strong>plicated,and c<strong>on</strong>servative.• LATF exposed this proposal for <strong>com</strong>ment at March meeting.• Academy was asked to provide input <strong>on</strong>:• The “X” factor which relates to the number of claims for a single durati<strong>on</strong>to be c<strong>on</strong>sidered to have sufficient data.• Margin table• Examples to test extremesSEAC Spring C<strong>on</strong>ferenceCopyright © 2012 by the American Academy of ActuariesAll Rights Reserved. 126


6/2/2012Applicable Industry Mortality Table• Determine appropriate industry table to blend with own experience• Using SOA Underwriting Criteria Scoring Tool or other methods, if moreappropriate• Currently, table is specified as 2008 VBT Tables, all forms• New tables being worked <strong>on</strong>• A modified industry basic table is permitted in a limited number ofsituati<strong>on</strong>s where an industry basic table does not appropriately reflect theexpected mortality experience• joint life mortality• simplified underwriting• substandard or rated livesSEAC Spring C<strong>on</strong>ferenceCopyright © 2012 by the American Academy of ActuariesAll Rights Reserved. 17Anticipated Experience Assumpti<strong>on</strong>s• Determine period for which sufficient data exists (based<strong>on</strong> policy durati<strong>on</strong>)• Determine aggregate credibility over sufficient dataperiod• Grade own <strong>com</strong>pany experience mortality rates toapplicable industry table following method specified• Make any adjustments for reas<strong>on</strong>ableness ofrelati<strong>on</strong>ships between classesSEAC Spring C<strong>on</strong>ferenceCopyright © 2012 by the American Academy of ActuariesAll Rights Reserved. 189


6/2/2012Mortality ExampleSetting anticipated experience assumpti<strong>on</strong>, Male Preferred and Male SuperPreferred N<strong>on</strong>smoker risksYears 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25+(1) % own exp 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 92% 85% 77% 69% 62% 54% 46% 38% 31% 23% 15% 8% 0% 0%(2) % industry table 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 8% 15% 23% 31% 38% 46% 54% 62% 69% 77% 85% 92% 100% 100%Experience Mortality Assumpti<strong>on</strong>% 2008 VBT RR80 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25+Assumpti<strong>on</strong> as % 08VBT 90% 92% 98% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98%Using C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> of total deathsSuper Preferred NS (35%)% 2008 VBT RR80 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25+(3) % own exp 82% 84% 90% 86% 86% 86% 86% 86% 86% 86% 87% 87% 87% 87% 87% 87% 87% 87% 87% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90%(4) % industry table 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Preferred NS (65%)% 2008 VBT RR80 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25+(5) % own exp 94% 96% 102% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 102% 102% 102% 102% 102% 102%(6) % industry table 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Anticipated Experience Assumpti<strong>on</strong>1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25+Male, SPNS 82% 84% 90% 86% 86% 86% 86% 86% 86% 86% 87% 88% 89% 90% 91% 92% 93% 94% 95% 97% 98% 98% 99% 100% 100%= [ (1) * (3) ] + [ (2) * (4) ] Male, PNS 94% 96% 102% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 99% 99% 99% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 101% 101% 100% 100% 100% 100%= [ (1) * (5) ] + [ (2) * (6) ] Weighted 90% 92% 98% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 95% 95% 96% 96% 97% 97% 97% 98% 98% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Check > Aggregate Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass PassSEAC Spring C<strong>on</strong>ferenceCopyright © 2012 by the American Academy of ActuariesAll Rights Reserved. 25Determining the Margin• A single margin in the form of a %• Margin % varies by issue age• Margin % still to be determined• Margin should be increased to reflect situati<strong>on</strong>sinvolving greater uncertaintySEAC Spring C<strong>on</strong>ferenceCopyright © 2012 by the American Academy of ActuariesAll Rights Reserved. 2613


6/2/2012Determining the Margin – CurrentFactorsPercentage margin table for <strong>com</strong>pany variati<strong>on</strong> riskIssue Age Load Issue Age Load


6/2/2012Margin C<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> For GrossPremium Reserve, c<strong>on</strong>t’d• The margins are specific to the underlying VBT tableand experience of the c<strong>on</strong>tributors relative to the mean(i.e., the variati<strong>on</strong> around the mean)• Margins/loads will need to be re-evaluated <strong>on</strong>ce 2014VBT is <strong>com</strong>plete• In interim, suggest just modifying the current table tobe based <strong>on</strong> attained age rather than issue ageSEAC Spring C<strong>on</strong>ferenceCopyright © 2012 by the American Academy of ActuariesAll Rights Reserved. 29Determining the Margin - ProposedPercentage margin table for <strong>com</strong>pany variati<strong>on</strong> riskAttained Age Load Attained Age Load


6/2/2012PBR Review and Updating Process• A well-c<strong>on</strong>ceived and designed PBR Review and Updating Process (formerlyreferred to as a "PBR Feedback Loop") is essential to ensure that there is an<strong>on</strong>going evaluati<strong>on</strong> of the effectiveness of the PBR methodology andprescribed assumpti<strong>on</strong>s defined in the Valuati<strong>on</strong> Manual.• Academy developed a proposal that provides a summary of the importance,purpose, and goals of such a process.• A key element of the PBR Review and Updating Process is providing supportto state insurance regulators regarding the necessary expertise, resources, data,and tools to effectively review PBR models and reporting for products subjectto PBR requirements.• LATF adopted the Academy proposal (with some modificati<strong>on</strong>s) in secti<strong>on</strong>VM-00 of the Manual.SEAC Spring C<strong>on</strong>ferenceCopyright © 2012 by the American Academy of ActuariesAll Rights Reserved. 31Q&ASEAC Spring C<strong>on</strong>ferenceCopyright © 2012 by the American Academy of ActuariesAll Rights Reserved. 3216

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!