NETS - Green Net Finland

More documents

Recommendations

Info

18 Norwegian companies where present at the exhibition. All companies distributed their ownbrochures presenting their products and services. One joint brochure was made in Polish forpresenting the co-operation and participating companies. Also, advertisements were placed inexhibition catalogue and some Polish magazines.As a result of the exhibition, a contact list of potential customers with names of 250 Polishdecision-makers was collected. Later, letters with information about Norwegian companies and thebenefits of co-operating were sent to them and contacts established with several organizations. Atleast one Norwegian company has been discussing with a Polish company to become theirrepresentative on the Polish market. Moreover, encouraged with the good results, more than half ofthe participating companies were also participating in Poleko exhibition 2008. Energidalen was incontact with about 20 companies, mostly in the biomass sector.LESSONS LEARNED FROM NORDIC NETWORKINGDuring the two-year project co-operation, the project partners faced many challenges, yet achievedthe project objectives so successfully that the willingness to continue co-operation has only grownduring the process. The lessons learned from Nordic networking as described here are not sectorspecificand can easily be applied to other business areas as well.Country-specific challenges can be overcomeAt the start of the project co-operation, country-specific factors that could pose risks in expandingthe national networks to Nordic level were identified and discussed by project partners.Promoting the idea of a Nordic Environmental Technology Network was not very popular inDenmark due to experiences gained by public and especially private institutions with “Green CitiesDenmark” – a comparable network at the national level. This network had just gone bankrupt withfinancial losses to all shareholders some months before the NETS idea started to develop. Thisincident clearly caused the reluctance of companies to become active members in NETS projectwith a financial contribution or to even show interest for participating in NETS activities.Furthermore, Denmark experienced a special situation: it occurred in 2007 that Denmark wasdeclared host for COP 15, the 15 th United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen inDecember 2009. Since then, the focus on cleantech and especially on energy technology as well ason measures and tools for climate change adaptation have become of high political and commercialinterest. Not only that demonstration projects on innovative technology are boosted for showing theworld Danish technology at its best – but also marketing efforts for technologies to attract as manyfuture clients as possible have been appearing all over. This situation resulted in a heavycompetition among upcoming “Cleantech networks” to attract companies’ involvement andmembers’ fee.Taking into account the driving force of strong national companies to convince also smallercompanies about the quality of an initiative, the Danish NETS partners feel to have used the earlyhour in 2007 quite well: Vestas, Velux, Solar Cap and VE-net have seen potential in NETS andbecame members. The Bright Green Initiative offered to promote NETS through their website. Andthe Danish Energy Authority approved to support the activity financially. This is also due to the fact15
that none of these national initiatives has established a comparably strong Nordic focus as theNETS partners are already consolidating.In the NETS starting phase, Finnish environmental networking was strengthening in different partsof the country. Green Net Finland had been founded a few years ago and had an established rolealready. In its traditional business areas, such as environmental monitoring, bioenergy, wastemanagement and mining, Green Net had been working successfully in cluster development and inoffering B2B services (finding partners, building value chains, etc.). However, the activity chosenin NETS project as Green Net’s specific focus area (energy efficiency of buildings) was new toGreen Net and, thus, extra efforts were required to get the key companies committed. In any case,this choice was made strategically, as at the same time, energy efficiency in the urban environmentwas chosen to be Green Net’s second major focus area in the national cleantech cluster, for whichGreen Net is designing and implementing the programme in the Uusimaa region for years 2007-2013.Sweden started building a national clean energy network and succeeded well. They also had somekind of barriers in the beginning, as the company register of SWENTEC was already functioning.Yet, 35 Swedish companies joined NETS activities and there are 10 more expected to join in thenear future. The Swedish companies are very much waiting for B2B activities and they underlinethat as this network has been set up, it must now be further developed and taken care of.Green Business Norway instead relied on their recent member companies, though also building newcontacts. This seemed to be a good strategy to start effectively new Nordic networking activities.Green Business was able to concentrate on B2B activities perhaps quicker than other partners.Networking needs trust, time and resourcesThe project partners were also faced with some common challenges that are not country-specific butrather typical for project-based business networking:• Companies seemed not as ready as expected to utilize the project as a means to find partners andbuild value chains. 86 out of 870 contacted companies participated in the project. Competingtechnology markets in the neighbouring Nordic countries hindered free floating of technologyback and forth between the member companies. Establishing B2B contacts to build value chainswas not desired as many of the bigger companies already had established networks and smallercompanies were lacking the required references and resources. It is much easier to commit thecompanies in building value chains in the form of consortium for international tenders thangeneric value chains for marketing purposes, as it is difficult for them to commit resources forsomething that does not provide for immediate results. Network-building is a lengthy process inwhich a two-year project can only lay the foundation for interested companies to take the lead indeveloping it further. Based on the experience of project partners, the coordination of a jointNordic B2B promotion is not simple and the communication structures for such activities needfurther planning.• It is also very important to take the limited capacities into account that companies can apply forinitiatives outside their core business. The partners exchanged experiences how to inform andattract companies to the NETS network without disturbing their daily business. Therefore, shortinformation and registration forms where developed to make involvement into the NETSwebsite as time effective as possible. Still, respecting cultural differences as well as the already16
Page 1 and 2: November 2008Nordic Environmental T
Page 3: Title:Nordic Environmental Technolo
Page 6 and 7: TABLE OF CONTENTSPREFACE ..........
Page 8 and 9: COMMON CHALLENGES CALL FOR CLOSER C
Page 10 and 11: Building a register of Nordic clean
Page 12 and 13: o building “a Nordic Hub”, a ne
Page 14 and 15: participants identified a strong de
Page 16 and 17: After the groundwork for network cr
Page 18 and 19: Picture: www.nordiccleantech.netThe
Page 20 and 21: Photo: NETS stand at the Environmen
Page 24 and 25: established relations with key comp
Page 26 and 27: Definition of the project’s focus
Page 28 and 29: advanced technological solutions of
Page 30 and 31: an increased determination of the g
Page 32 and 33: Another purpose of monitoring is to
Page 34 and 35: Proposals Short Term Services Longe
Page 36 and 37: Proposals Short Term Services Longe
Page 38 and 39: APPENDIX 3. PARTICIPATING COMPANIES
Page 40 and 41: Company Key words Web Countrytreatm
Page 42: APPENDIX 5. SUMMARY OF OUTPUTS, RES

NETS - Green Net Finland

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?