continued development of high-power laser facilitiesbased on the known technology of glass lasers. Developmentof the more advanced lasers, such as the kryptonfluoride gas laser, has been substantially postponed untilgiant glass laser systems achieve the laboratory demonstrationof inertial confinement <strong>fusion</strong>, which is expectedsometime in the mid- to late-1980s.When Dr. John Foster, vice president for science of theTRW Corporation and chairman of the Department ofEnergy's Ad Hoc Panel to Review Fusion Energy Research,testified before the House Armed Services Committeerecently, he called for doubling the inertial confinementbudget and putting a substantial portion of the addedfunds into realizing large-scale advanced lasers like thekrypton fluoride system. Foster based his case on theargument that development of civilian <strong>fusion</strong> <strong>energy</strong> mustbe a national priority. In this context, he noted, inertialconfinement <strong>fusion</strong> provides a totally independent andessential backup to development of <strong>fusion</strong> power plantsbased on magnetic confinement <strong>fusion</strong> by the end of thiscentury.The House Armed Services Committee, which overseesthe inertial confinement work, ignored Foster's recommendations,keeping the budget at last year's level. Andwhen the Carter administration recommended in its fiscalyear 1981 budget the elimination of construction funds forthe flagship glass laser system, the Nova, at LawrenceLivermore Laboratory in California, Congress reacted byrestoring the Nova funds with money from the minimalfunding it had previously allotted to the advanced lasereffort. 1 It was this latest move, in May, that put the kryptonlaser program in jeopardy.The reasoning of these committee members goes somethinglike this: The scientists tell us that the scientific basisfor inertial confinement <strong>fusion</strong> is well understood sincethey have been successfully detonating H-bombs for morethan 25 years. They told us that we could generate miniatureH-bombs in the laboratory with glass lasers, thereforesaving millions of dollars on underground weaponstests for further development of nuclear warheads andmeasurement of their effects. Now that we have spenttens of millions on building high-power glass lasers, theywant us to go off in a totally new direction with thekrypton fluoride laser. Let's not waste time and money onunknown technologies. Let's get the job done with glasslasers first and then we can see about funding thesealternative systems.The fact is that even within the terms of the HouseArmed Services Committee's defense-minded perspective,the development of the krypton fluoride laser is essentialfor inertial confinement <strong>fusion</strong> and for the national security.The important point here is that although theH-bomb part of nuclear weapons systems is the mostpredictable and reliable element in the defense arsenal,the fundamental processes involved in preparing andigniting inertial confinement <strong>fusion</strong> reactions are nowcomprehended only in a pragmatic manner. Cutting theadvanced laser <strong>fusion</strong> program will obstruct scientificresearch that is key to both the future <strong>energy</strong> and defenseneeds of the United States.Foster's argument about doubling the inertial confinementbudget was backed up by the study his ad hoc DOEcommittee completed in spring 1979. The exact conclusionsof the so-called Foster Report have remained amystery, for the Carter administration summarily classifiedit as "top secret" and even went so far as to "withdraw"a public presentation given by a DOE official on its chiefconclusions in order to prevent open discussion of itscontents. 2The Foster Committee, formed more than two years agoby the DOE, consists of top-level managers from industryand government scientific-program directors. ChairmanJohn Foster, who formerly directed the Lawrence LivermoreLaboratory and the Department of Defense DevelopmentResearch and Engineering division, is representativeof the type of credentials held by the panel'smembers.The Foster ReportIn its first report, issued in summer 1978, the FosterCommittee concluded that the commercial developmentof both magnetic and inertial <strong>fusion</strong> was essential formeeting the future <strong>energy</strong> needs of the United States. Thepanel also stated the need for a more detailed review ofthe inertial confinement program. In particular, the panelnoted the difficult physics problems involved and thatmuch of this research is classified because its fundamentalprocesses are used for designing hydrogen bombs.Based on the presentation on the Foster Committeereport that was later "withdrawn" by the DOE and athorough review of inertial confinement research paperspublished in open scientific journals, it is now possible toreconstruct, at least in outline, the chief arguments of theFoster Committee's suppressed report.The findings go something like this:First, although inertial confinement has not reached thesame advanced scientific level as magnetic confinementresearch—where the demonstration of scientific feasibilityis assured—it is particularly promising as a future commercial<strong>energy</strong> source and must be developed in parallelwith magnetic confinement in order to develop powerreactors by the end of this century. Inertial confinement<strong>fusion</strong> is so promising because it represents an entirelyindependent approach to harnessing <strong>fusion</strong> reactions thathas been pragmatically demonstrated in the form of hydrogenbombs.Second, significant progress has been achieved sincethe effort began in the early 1970s. As a result, the scientificdemonstration can be confidently expected by the midtolate-1980s—if researchers are given the proper toolsand sufficient funds.Third, what is lacking is the kind of technology developmentprogram needed to ensure that driver systemscapable of meeting the needs of commercial power plantsand overall reactor designs will be available at the pointthat scientific feasibility has been demonstrated.Fourth, development of driver technology could, furthermore,be essential for attaining scientific feasibility.Fifth, the panel concluded with a call for doubling theinertial confinement budget and putting the increasedSeptember 1980 FUSION 49
_funds into specific programs for developing advancedlasers, light ion, heavy ion, and electron beam drivers, aswell as a reactor technology development program.In substance the report focused on the connectionsbetween inertial confinement <strong>fusion</strong> and hydrogen bombdesign and the progress in design of laser <strong>fusion</strong> targets(pellets containing <strong>fusion</strong> fuel). Although there have beenmajor scientific problems in terms of coupling thfe laser<strong>energy</strong> to the target and projecting the resulting compressionand heating of the <strong>fusion</strong> fuel, the panel found thatprogress has been sufficient to ensure success. In particular,laboratory research combined with continuing progressin H-bomb development and testing has advanced tothe point that particular qualities of the inertial confinement<strong>fusion</strong> driver needed for scientific demonstrationcan be confidently projected.All the evidence was not available at the time that theFoster report was completed, but the panel did djiscoverthat the krypton fluoride laser appeared to be preciselythe tool to achieve scientific demonstration and providethe technology for power reactors. Developments sincethen have fully confirmed this initial evaluation.How Inertial Confinement WorksIn an H-bomb, the confining pressure is indirectlyprovided by the electromagnetic radiation output of anatom bomb. The majority of the initial <strong>energy</strong> spectrumof an atomic fission bomb consists of "soft" X+rays. Atarget consisting of hydrogen <strong>fusion</strong> fuel is placed! next tothe A-bomb. The soft X-rays traveling at the speed of lightimpinge on the <strong>fusion</strong> target before any blast effects arefelt. These X-rays are absorbed by the surface layer of thetarget. As a result, this material is vaporized and rapidlyexpands outward. This is called ablation. In the samefashion as a rocket engine, ablation generates an equaland oppositely directed force (in this case, an inwardlydirected force called an implosion). The great power ofthe atom bomb X-ray burst quickly transforms this inwardlydirected force into an inwardly directed shockwave. The shock wave acts as a giant compression cylinder,driving the interior of the <strong>fusion</strong> fuel target to higher andhigher densities.The geometry of the target is arranged so that thecompression shock will converge. When the shock wavefinally reaches the center of the target, the hydrogen<strong>fusion</strong> fuel has been compressed to densities greater thanthat of lead and hundreds to thousands of times greaterthan that of liquid hydrogen. At this point, the shock wavecollapses on itself, and its <strong>energy</strong> is transformed into heat.As a result, a minute amount of the core of the compressed<strong>fusion</strong> fuel is heated to the multi-million-degree temperaturesneeded to ignite thermonuclear reactions (about50 million degrees Celsius). The <strong>energy</strong> from these initial<strong>fusion</strong> reactions is absorbed by the "cold" outer layers ofthe compressed fuel, in this way igniting the cold fuel.In fact, this heating is so fast that a supersonic thermonuclear6urn wave is generated, which roars through thecompressed fuel so quickly that most of it reacts beforethe entire target blows up. For a typical H-bomb, all ofthis takes but a few millionths of a second, and the onlyforce confining the fuel while it burns is the inertia of itsown mass.Laboratory inertial confinement replaces the necessarilygigantic atom-bomb "match" with a tiny though just as(a) Laser light hitting <strong>fusion</strong> fuel target (b) Ablating plasma (c) Decoupled ablating plasmaFigure 1ABLATING IMPLOSION IN LASER FUSIONThe basic phases of ablative implosion are shown here schematically. In the first phase, a, an ablating plasma isformed by the laser light hitting the surface of the <strong>fusion</strong> target. In phase b, the laser light is absorbed within theablating plasma and the plasma then transports the resulting heat <strong>energy</strong> to the target surface so that ablation ismaintained. If this transport is interrupted, as /> shown in c, then the ablating plasma (also called corona) becomesdecoupled from the target surface.50 FUSION September 1980
- Page 2 and 3: FUSIONMAGAZINE OF THE FUSION ENERGY
- Page 4 and 5: of the Academy drew an editorial bl
- Page 6 and 7: LettersRiemann Vs. Darwin:Evolution
- Page 8 and 9: LettersContinued from page 7The Aut
- Page 10 and 11: News BriefsCarlos de HoyosUwe Parpa
- Page 12 and 13: News BriefsU.S. BUDGET CUTS TARGET
- Page 14 and 15: Special ReportWhy MonetarismDestroy
- Page 16 and 17: according to Mitchell, the seminal
- Page 18 and 19: the worst accident that could possi
- Page 20 and 21: subways), fossil-fueled power plant
- Page 22 and 23: should be started now, Levitt state
- Page 24 and 25: TheNASAStoryThe Fight forAmerica'sb
- Page 26: To one leading military faction at
- Page 29 and 30: created since the midcentury, in at
- Page 31 and 32: created the rockets and all the ins
- Page 33: While the military and the presiden
- Page 36 and 37: James E. Webb (right), the NASA adm
- Page 38 and 39: NASAAnatoly Dobrynin (foreground),
- Page 40 and 41: TheNATOPlan to KillUS. Scienceby Ma
- Page 42 and 43: Europe, Bertrand de Jouvenel, himse
- Page 44 and 45: could well be a "three-way split; i
- Page 46 and 47: mation of a U.S. Association for th
- Page 50 and 51: intense beam of laser light, ions,
- Page 52 and 53: toward the generation of "hot" elec
- Page 54 and 55: system that combined the KrF with a
- Page 56 and 57: Others have charged that scientists
- Page 58 and 59: AAAS-Brookings Conf.:Nonscience Age
- Page 60 and 61: Siberian development is at thecente
- Page 62 and 63: tition from the antinuclear Union o
- Page 64 and 65: as the primary driver to implode th
- Page 66 and 67: A CDC spokesman said that thenew sy
- Page 68 and 69: Space Science& TechnologyThe Solar
- Page 70 and 71: hoto by C. Srinivasen/United Nation
- Page 72 and 73: 1975. This index has been at or bel
- Page 74 and 75: course, the primary cooling systemi
- Page 76 and 77: _The Young Scientist.What IsEnergy?
- Page 78 and 79: Lyndon LaRoucke, Democrat for Presi