1 - Mahajana.net

More documents

Recommendations

Info

VIPagePart IL —The Sensible World 79—118Chapter I. — The theory of Instantaneous Being (ksanika-vada).§ 1. The problem stated 79§ 2. Reality is ki<strong>net</strong>ic 81§ 3. Argument from ideality of Time and Space 84§ 4. Duration and extention are not real 86§ 5. Argument from direct perception - 87§ 6. Recognition does not prove duration 88§ 7. Argument from an analysis of the notion of existence ... 89§ 8. Argument from an analysis of the notion of non-existence . 91§ 9. Santiraksita's formula 95§ 10. Change and annihilation . . . . 96§ 11. Motion is discontinuous 98§ 12. Annihilation certain a priori 102§ 13. Momentariness deduced from the law of Contradiction . . . 103§ 14. Is the point-instant a reality? The Differential Calculus . . 106§ 15. History of the doctrine of Momentariness 108§ 16. Some European Parallels 114Chapter II. —• Causation (pratltya-samutplda)§ 1. Causation as functional dependence 119§ 2 The formulas of causation 121§ 3. Causation and Reality identical 124§ 4. Two kinds of Causality 126§ 5. Plurality of causes 127§ 6, Infinity of causes 129§ 7. Causality and Free Will 131§ 8. The four meanings of Dependent Origination 134§ 9. Some European Parallels 141Chapter III. — Sense-perception (pratyaksam).§ 1. The definition of sense-perception 146§ 2. The experiment of Dharmakirti 150§ 3. Perception and illusion 153§ 4. The varieties of intuition 161a) Mental sensation (manasa-praktyaksa) 161b) The intelligible intuition of the Saint (yogi-pratyaksa) ... 162c) Introspection (svasamvedana) 168§ 5. History of the Iudian vies on sense-perception 169§ 6. Some European Parallels 175Chapter IV. — Ultimate reality (paramartha-sat).§ 1. What is ultimately real 181§ 2. The Particular is the ultimate reality 183§ 3. Reality is unutterable 185§ 4. Reality produces a vivid image . . .• 186§ 5. Ultimate Reality is dynamic • 189§ 6. The Monad and the Atom 190§ 7. Reality is Affirmation 192
VIIPage§ 8. Objections 193§ 9. The evolution of the views on Reality 195§ 10. Some European Parallels 198Part III.—The constructed world 204—362Chapter I. — Judgment.§ 1. Transition from pure Bensation to conception 204§ 2. The first steps of the Understanding 209§ 3. A judgment what . . . . 211§ 4. Judgment and the synthesis in concepts 213§ 5. Judgment and namegiving 214§ 6. Categories 216§ 7. Judgment viewed as analysis 219§ 8. Judgment as objectively valid 220§ 9. History of the theory of judgment 223§ 10. Some European Parallels 226Chapter II. — Inference§ 1. Judgment and Inference 231§ 2. The three terms 233§ 3. The various definitions of inference . 236§ 4. Inferring and Inference . 238§ 5. How far Inference is true knowledge , . . 239§ 6. The three Aspects of the Reason 242§ 7. Dhamakirti's tract on relations 245§ 8. Two lines of dependence 24%§ 9. Analytic and Synthetic judgments 250§ 10. The final table of Categories 252§ 11. Are the items of the table mutually exclusive 254§ 12. Is the Buddhist table of relations exhaustive 256§ 13. Universal and Necessary Judgments 260§ 14. The limits of the use of pure Understanding 262§ 15. Historical sketch of the views of Inference . . . . . . . . 264§ 16. Some European Parallels 269Chapter III. — Syllogism (pararthanumanam).§ 1. Definition # - 275§ 2. The members of syllogism . 279§ 3. Syllogism and Induction . 281§ 4. The figures of Syllogism 283§ 5. The value of Syllogism « . . . 287§ 6. Historical sketch of Syllogism viewed as inference for others . 290§ 7. European and Buddhist Syllogism 295a) Definition by Aristotle and by the Buddhists 296b) Aristotle's Syllogism from Example 297c) Inference and Induction * . . 298d) The Buddhist syllogism contains two propositions 301e) Contraposition 301f) Figures 303
Page 5: TO THE DEAR MEMORYOFMY BELOVED MOTH
Page 10 and 11: VIIIPageg) The Causal and Hypotheti
Page 12 and 13: ABBREVIATIONSAnekSntaj. Anekanta-ja
Page 14 and 15: XIIIn addressing itself to the phil
Page 16 and 17: VaiSesika
Page 24 and 25: NirvaNa,Svatantrika
Page 26 and 27: 12 BUDDHIST LOGICby two great men,
Page 28 and 29: 14 BUDDHIST LOGICgreatest men of th
Page 30: Nirvana
Page 34: 20 BUDDHIST LOGICThe Sankhya system
Page 37 and 38: INTBODUCTION 23which our speech con
Page 39 and 40: INTBODUCTION 2 5external world corr
Page 41 and 42: INTRODUCTION 2 7blems. The Buddhist
Page 43 and 44: INTRODUCTION 29or followed the habi
Page 45 and 46: INTRODUCTION 31and criticized as su
Page 47 and 48: INTRODUCTION 33just as he dissented
Page 49 and 50: INTRODUCTION 35He died in Kalinga i
Page 51 and 52: INTRODUCTION 37§ 10. THE WOEKS OF
Page 53 and 54: INTRODUCTION 39rence from syllogism
Page 55 and 56: INTRODUCTION 41esteem by the Tibeta
Page 57 and 58: INTRODUCTION 43differed radically i
Page 59 and 60:
INTRODUCTION 45Jnanasirt, but the f
Page 61 and 62:
INTRODUCTION 473s^ Sub-commentary b
Page 63 and 64:
INTRODUCTION 4 9Souls, all Universa
Page 65 and 66:
INTEODTTCTION 51of view. These conc
Page 67 and 68:
INTBODUCTION 5 3This new logic was
Page 69 and 70:
INTKODUCTION 55In the next century
Page 71 and 72:
INTBODUCTION 57and introduce the co
Page 73 and 74:
PART I.REALITY AND KNOWLEDGE,(prama
Page 75 and 76:
BEALITY AND KNOWLEDGE 61inferences
Page 77 and 78:
CandrakirtiNyaya-Naiyayikas,
Page 79 and 80:
BEALITY AND KNOWLEDGE 65such causes
Page 81 and 82:
BEALITY AND KNOWLEDGE 67that every
Page 83 and 84:
EEALITY AND KNOWLEDGE 69is only an
Page 85 and 86:
REALITY AND KNOWLEDGE 71Wherever th
Page 87 and 88:
BEALITY AND KNOWLEDGE 73different s
Page 89 and 90:
BEALITY AND KNOWLEDGE 75in India, j
Page 91 and 92:
EEALITY AND KNOWLEDGE / /from sheer
Page 93 and 94:
PART II.THE SENSIBLE WORLD.CHAPTER
Page 95 and 96:
THE THEOBY OP INSTANTANEOUS BEING 8
Page 97 and 98:
THE THEORY OF INSTANTANEOUS BEING 8
Page 99 and 100:
THE THEOBY OP INSTANTANEOUS BEING 8
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
THE THEOBY OF INSTANTANEOUS BEING 8
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
THE THEOEY OF INSTANTANEOUS BEIN0 9
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
THE THEOEY OF INSTANTANEOUS BEING 1
Page 123 and 124:
THE THEOKY OF INSTANTANEOUS BEING 1
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
THE XHEOEY OF INSTANTANEOUS BEING 1
Page 133 and 134:
CAUSATION 119CHAPTER II.CAUSATION(P
Page 135 and 136:
CAUSATION 121a tight embracement by
Page 137 and 138:
CAUSATION 123It is clear that this
Page 139 and 140:
CAUSATION 125means that to be real
Page 141 and 142:
CAUSATION 127There are thus two cau
Page 143 and 144:
CAUSATION 129instead of explaining
Page 145 and 146:
CAUSATION 131event». That is to sa
Page 147 and 148:
CAUSATION 133characterized in all i
Page 149 and 150:
CAUSATION 135measure in which they
Page 151 and 152:
CAUSATION 137No one there is who as
Page 153 and 154:
CAUSATION 139but later on, under th
Page 155 and 156:
CAUSATION 141The meaning of the ter
Page 157 and 158:
CAUSATION 143acceptance of a double
Page 159 and 160:
CAUSATION 145it must have been for
Page 161 and 162:
SENSE-PEBCEPTION 147our conceptual
Page 163 and 164:
SENSE-PERCEPTION 149every cognition
Page 165 and 166:
SENSE-PERCEPTION 151is something qu
Page 167 and 168:
SENSE-PERCEPTION 153Dignaga quotes
Page 169 and 170:
SENSE-PEKCEPTION 155transfer us int
Page 171 and 172:
SENSE-PERCEPTION 157cognition that
Page 173 and 174:
SENSE-PEKCEPTION 159distinguished f
Page 175 and 176:
SENSE-PERCEPTION 161only way of dir
Page 177 and 178:
SENSE-PERCEPTION 163c) Introspectio
Page 179 and 180:
SENSE-PERCEPTION 165inner sense, 1
Page 181 and 182:
SENSE-PEE CEPTION 167«In every cas
Page 183 and 184:
SENSE-PERCEPTION 1 6 9by its very e
Page 185 and 186:
SENSE-PERCEPTION 171of a special st
Page 187 and 188:
SENSE-PEKCEPTION 173According to th
Page 189 and 190:
SENSE-PERCEPTION 175criticized by D
Page 191 and 192:
SENSE-PEKCEPTION 177make any suffic
Page 193 and 194:
SENSE-PERCEPTION 179conception, and
Page 195 and 196:
ULTIMATE EEALITY 181CHAPTER IV.ULTI
Page 197 and 198:
ULTIMATE REALITY 13313) it is non-e
Page 199 and 200:
ULTIMATE BEAUTY 185ral essence, 1 t
Page 201 and 202:
ULTIMATE BEALITY- 1S7ratio to the d
Page 203 and 204:
ULTIMATE REALITY 183The vagueness i
Page 205 and 206:
ULTIMATE REALITY 191translucent. Ev
Page 207 and 208:
ULTIMATE REALITY 193affirmation ana
Page 209 and 210:
ULTIMATE REALITY 195A Jain philosop
Page 211 and 212:
ULTIMATE REALITY 197existence, the
Page 213 and 214:
ULTIMATE BEALITY 199have seen, is q
Page 215 and 216:
ULTIMATE REALITY 201which is not ul
Page 217 and 218:
ULTIMATE BEALITY2OSthe ultimately s
Page 219 and 220:
JUDGMENT 205if we like, also call a
Page 221 and 222:
JUDGMENT 207spection. l But the mom
Page 223 and 224:
JUDGMENT 209The moment of intelligi
Page 225 and 226:
JUDGMENT 211stroke to each pot and
Page 227 and 228:
JUDGMENT 213as, e. g., of the moon
Page 229 and 230:
JUDGMENT 215stopping 1 at some of t
Page 231 and 232:
JUDGMENT 217The categories of the B
Page 233 and 234:
JUDGMENT 219We will find them, or t
Page 235 and 236:
JUDGMENT 221what is external and si
Page 237 and 238:
JUDGMENT 223is affirmed with full c
Page 239 and 240:
JUDGMENT 225In Mahayana the theory
Page 241 and 242:
JUDGMENT 227course consists in a de
Page 243 and 244:
JUDGMENT 229distinction, says J. S.
Page 245 and 246:
INFERENCE 231CHAPTER II.INFERENCE.
Page 247 and 248:
INFERENCE 233a combination of them,
Page 249 and 250:
INFERENCE 235quality of the subject
Page 251 and 252:
INFEEENCE 237would have been cogniz
Page 253 and 254:
INFERENCE 239of the Mark as present
Page 255 and 256:
INFERENCE 241resort to imagination
Page 257 and 258:
INFEBBNCE 243similar and disagreeme
Page 259 and 260:
INFERENCE 2452. In Similar only.3.
Page 261 and 262:
INFEBENCE 247Dharmakirti attached s
Page 263 and 264:
INFERENCE 249There is no third poss
Page 265 and 266:
INFERENCE 251Strictly speaking both
Page 267 and 268:
INFERENCE 253We shall thus have two
Page 269 and 270:
INFERENCE 255different varieties of
Page 271 and 272:
INFERENCE 257or, if the objective r
Page 273 and 274:
INFERENCE 259the other only when th
Page 275 and 276:
INFERENCE 261fore in safety against
Page 277 and 278:
INFERENCE 263although they are inde
Page 279 and 280:
INFERENCE 265perception nor inferen
Page 281 and 282:
INFERENCE 267establish a relation o
Page 283 and 284:
INFERENCE 269§ 16. SOME EUROPEAN P
Page 285 and 286:
INFERENCE 271Remains the problem of
Page 287 and 288:
INFEBENCE 273analytical in the sens
Page 289 and 290:
SYLLOGISM . 275CHAPTER III.SYLLOGIS
Page 291 and 292:
SYLLOGISM 277Inference for one self
Page 293 and 294:
SYLLOGISM 279and 2) is the Middle d
Page 295 and 296:
SYLLOGISM 281degree, as the major p
Page 297 and 298:
SYLLOGISM 283and its absence from a
Page 299 and 300:
SYLLOGISM 285An analytical deductio
Page 301 and 302:
SYLLOGISM 287ipsvus, the other to t
Page 303 and 304:
SYLLOGISM 289therefore stated that
Page 305 and 306:
SYLLOGISM 291He envisaged inference
Page 307 and 308:
SYLLOGISM 293the example of the Vai
Page 309 and 310:
SYLLOGISM 295Buddhism, and all thin
Page 311 and 312:
SYLLOGISM 297proposition necessaril
Page 313 and 314:
SYLLOGISM 299Induction. Aristotle d
Page 315 and 316:
SYLLOGISM 301as the Hindus say, wil
Page 317 and 318:
SYLLOGISM 303not be reversed. The s
Page 319 and 320:
SYLLOGISM 305and one of the moods o
Page 321 and 322:
SYLLOGISM 307in the first. Dharmott
Page 323 and 324:
SYLLOGISM 309calls the Aristotelian
Page 325 and 326:
SYLLOGISM 311In this sense the logi
Page 327 and 328:
SYLLOGISM 313the effect, or the maj
Page 329 and 330:
SYLLOGISM 315Where there never is f
Page 331 and 332:
SYLLOGISM 317principles of Identity
Page 333 and 334:
SYLLOGISM 319than Causality (betwee
Page 335 and 336:
LOGICAL FALLACIES 321of fallacies a
Page 337 and 338:
*16F\\\ „635 3a ^ ^/O / * -\/oyer
Page 339 and 340:
LOGICAL FALLACIES 325other interdep
Page 341 and 342:
LOGICAL FALLACIES 3271. When P is r
Page 343 and 344:
LOGICAL FALLACIES 329minor term, wi
Page 345 and 346:
LOGICAL FALLACIES 331contradictoril
Page 347 and 348:
LOGICAL FALLACIES 333Above and bene
Page 349 and 350:
LOGICAL FALLACIES 335included. If w
Page 351 and 352:
LOGICAL FALLACIES 337presence of th
Page 353 and 354:
LOGICAL FALLACIES 339its absence in
Page 355:
LOGICAL FALLACIES 3414) abandoning
Page 358 and 359:
344 BUDDHIST LOGICcan always be don
Page 360 and 361:
346 BUDDHIST LOGICtell, since there
Page 362 and 363:
348 BUDDHIST LOGICone another, doub
Page 364 and 365:
350 BUDDHIST LOGICthese realistic s
Page 366 and 367:
352 BUDDHIST LOGICnaive reader by a
Page 368 and 369:
354 BUDDHIST LOGICillogical and new
Page 370 and 371:
356 BUDDHIST LOGICnon-linguistic, e
Page 372 and 373:
358 BUDDHIST LOGICthe real connecti
Page 374 and 375:
360 BUDDHIST LOGICdependence of the
Page 376 and 377:
362 BUDDHIST LOGICthen only be eith
Page 378 and 379:
364 BUDDHIST LOGICalways the work o
Page 380 and 381:
366 BUBDHIST LOGICThus a fancied pe
Page 382 and 383:
368 BUDDHIST LOGICBuddhists Non-exi
Page 384 and 385:
370 BUDDHIST LOGIC§ 3. THE FIGUBES
Page 386 and 387:
372 BUDDHIST LOGICConclusion. On th
Page 388 and 389:
374 BUDDHIST LOGICof the object, wh
Page 390 and 391:
376 BUDDHIST LOGICMajor premise. Wh
Page 392 and 393:
378 BUDDHIST LOGICsense?, this figu
Page 394 and 395:
380 BUDDHIST LOGICopposed to the fa
Page 396 and 397:
382 BUDDHIST LOGICand its cognition
Page 398 and 399:
384 BUDDHIST LOGICis established wh
Page 400 and 401:
386 BUDDHIST LOGICis incognizable i
Page 402 and 403:
388 BUDDHIST LOGICand non-existence
Page 404 and 405:
390 BUDDHIST LOGICScholastic Vedant
Page 406 and 407:
392 BUDDHIST LOGICThat this is real
Page 408 and 409:
394 BUDDHIST LOGICEns, the Hoc-Aliq
Page 410 and 411:
396 BUDDHIST LOGICBut although it i
Page 412 and 413:
398 BUDDHIST LOGIChut Brentano and
Page 414 and 415:
BUDDHIST LOGICCHAPTER II.THE LAW OF
Page 416 and 417:
402 BUDDHIST LOGICsomething incompa
Page 418 and 419:
404 BUDDHIST LOGICof Excluded Middl
Page 420 and 421:
406 BUDDHIST LOGICthe following par
Page 422 and 423:
408 BUDDHIST LOGICbut only to const
Page 424 and 425:
410 BUDDHIST LOGICFor Instantaneoun
Page 426 and 427:
412 BUDDHIST LOGICA thing possessin
Page 428 and 429:
414 BUDDHIST LOGICwas in this respe
Page 430 and 431:
416 BUDDHIST LOGICThemselves, which
Page 432 and 433:
418 BUDDHIST LOGICDouble Negation n
Page 434 and 435:
420 BUDDHIST LOGICthere is absolute
Page 436 and 437:
422 BUDDHIST LOGICWe have seen that
Page 438 and 439:
424 BUDDHIST LOGICthat it can be ad
Page 440 and 441:
426 BUDDHIST LOGICmuch more akin to
Page 442 and 443:
428 BUDDHIST LOGICnon-existent, ind
Page 444 and 445:
430 BUDDHIST LOGIC« There are in t
Page 446 and 447:
432 BUDDHIST LOGICEns does not exis
Page 448 and 449:
434 BUDDHIST LOGICAn idea «in itse
Page 450 and 451:
436 BUDDHIST LOGICthe Aristotelian
Page 452 and 453:
438 BUDDHIST LOGICHe therefore conv
Page 454 and 455:
440 BUDDHIST LOGICdifferent. It is
Page 456 and 457:
442 BUDDHIST LOGICBut the Buddhist
Page 458 and 459:
444 BUDDHIST LOGICCHAPTER III.UNIVE
Page 460 and 461:
446 BUDDHIST LOGICsubstances! But n
Page 462 and 463:
448 BUDDHIST LOGICWe see that the a
Page 464 and 465:
450 BUDDHIST LOGICSince all things
Page 466 and 467:
452 BUDDHIST LOGICvidual it somehow
Page 468 and 469:
454 BTJDDHIBT LOGICsuggests to the
Page 470 and 471:
456 BUDDHIST LOGICto the reality of
Page 472 and 473:
458 BUDDHIST LOGICWhat is indeed th
Page 474 and 475:
460 BUDDHIST LOGICaffirmation, «pu
Page 476 and 477:
462 BUDDHIST LOGIC(Jinendrabuddhi,
Page 478 and 479:
464 BUDDHIST LOGICstood as the dire
Page 480 and 481:
466 BUDDHIST LOGICtion) of repudiat
Page 482 and 483:
468 BUDDHIST LOGICfrom its varietie
Page 484 and 485:
470 BUDDHIST LOGICd) The experience
Page 486 and 487:
472 BUDDHIST LOGIC(316. 25). ((Nega
Page 488 and 489:
474 BUDDHIST LOGICSimple Negation m
Page 490 and 491:
476 BUDDHIST LOGICalone). They have
Page 492 and 493:
478 BUDDHIST LOGICment of some of t
Page 494 and 495:
480 BUDDHIST LOGICexist some common
Page 496 and 497:
482 BUDDHIST LOGICness. E. g., inst
Page 498 and 499:
484 BUDDHIST LOGICand the Indians.
Page 500 and 501:
486 BUDDHIST LOGICsensation just as
Page 502 and 503:
488 BUDDHIST LOGICled «privative^;
Page 504 and 505:
490 BUDDHIST LOGICthoroughly invest
Page 506 and 507:
492 BUDDHIST LOGICat the same time
Page 508 and 509:
494 BUDDHIST LOGIC10) This direct a
Page 510 and 511:
496 BUDDHIST LOGICall? Was Sigwart
Page 512 and 513:
498 BUDDHIST LOGICwith affirmation.
Page 514 and 515:
500 BUDDHIST LOGICamazing in the hi
Page 516 and 517:
502 BUDDHIST LOGICProfessor Ulrici'
Page 518 and 519:
504 BUDDHIST LOGICFrom the summary
Page 520 and 521:
506 BUDDHIST LOGICPART VREALITY OF
Page 522 and 523:
508 BUDDHIST LOGICto reality. The f
Page 524 and 525:
510 BUDDHICT LOGIC§ 4. CBITICAL RE
Page 526 and 527:
512 BUDDHIST LOGICfrom other things
Page 528 and 529:
514 BUDDHIST LOGICledge should aban
Page 530 and 531:
516 BUDDHIST LOGICits real Elements
Page 532 and 533:
518 BUDDHIST LOGICrial object is ne
Page 534 and 535:
520 BUDDHIST LOGICand appearing to
Page 536 and 537:
522 BUDDHIST LOGICmust exist, and t
Page 538 and 539:
524 BUDDHIST LOGICboth see two real
Page 540 and 541:
526 BUDDHIST LOGICis very subtle an
Page 542 and 543:
528 BUDDHIST LOGICis contained in t
Page 544 and 545:
530 BUDDHIST LOGICthan anything can
Page 546 and 547:
532 BUDDHIST LOGICtual judgment. 1
Page 548 and 549:
534 BUDDHIST LOGIC5) The ultimate r
Page 550 and 551:
536 BUDDHIST LOGICand cognition is
Page 552 and 553:
538 BUDDHIST LOGICor illumined, in
Page 554 and 555:
540 BUDDHIST LOGICBuddhist. You nee
Page 556 and 557:
542 BUDDHIST LOGICd) Fourth Convers
Page 558 and 559:
544 BUDDHIST LOGICneous. We call it
Page 560 and 561:
546 BUDDHIST LOGICis expressed in t
Page 562 and 563:
NyAya-kanika,NyAya-praveSa, ^PaNcap
Page 564 and 565:
550 INDEX OF PROPER NAMESJacobi, F.
Page 566 and 567:
INDEX OF MAIN LOGICAL TOPICSAnalyti
Page 568 and 569:
554 INDEX OF MAIN LOGICAL TOPICS(he
Page 570 and 571:
556 INDEX OP MAIN LOGICAL TOPICSnec
Page 572 and 573:
558 APPENDIXAPPENDIX.Professor Ui i
Page 574:
560 ADDENDA ET CORRIGENDAPage214217
show all

1 - Mahajana.net

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?