13.07.2015 Views

Acknowledgement Letter from Assistant Secretary of the Army for ...

Acknowledgement Letter from Assistant Secretary of the Army for ...

Acknowledgement Letter from Assistant Secretary of the Army for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYOFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARYCIVIL WORKS108 ARMY PENTAGONWASHINGTON DC 20310-0108AUG 1 0 2007Mr. Jim Wood, ChairmanArkansas River Study Committee56 Delaware Bay RoadDardanelle, Arkansas 72834Dear Mr. Wood:Thank you <strong>for</strong> your letter <strong>of</strong> July 16, 2007 regarding In<strong>for</strong>rrWion QualityAct issues that your organization raised with <strong>the</strong> U.S. <strong>Army</strong> Gorp$ <strong>of</strong> Errgineerson <strong>the</strong> McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation Feasibility Study andEnvironmental Impact Statement. I am providing you with an int J rim response asI have deterrr~ined that <strong>the</strong> Corps did not meet previous milestongs on yourrequest. I <strong>of</strong>fer you my sincere apology <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> a prompt response. I havetaken steps to assure that a full response to your request is processed in <strong>the</strong>shortest possible amount <strong>of</strong> time.The process <strong>of</strong> responding to inquiries through <strong>the</strong> In<strong>for</strong>mdtion Quality Act,Request <strong>for</strong> Corrections (RFC) is complex. Upon receipt <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ~ FC, <strong>the</strong> Corps<strong>of</strong> Engineers sends a letter to requester acknowledging receipt <strong>of</strong>f RFC anddenoting a date <strong>for</strong> response. The appropriate District, Division qndHeadquarters <strong>of</strong>fices within <strong>the</strong> Corps assess <strong>the</strong> technical quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> databeing questioned and coordinate a draft response. The draft res onse withtechnical arguments/corrections is <strong>for</strong>warded to <strong>the</strong> Headquarter ! Corps <strong>of</strong>Engineers <strong>for</strong> review and approval. The Headquarters reviews tde response,adds procedural and administrative appeal in<strong>for</strong>mation, and provi~des <strong>the</strong> finaldraft response to <strong>the</strong> Office <strong>of</strong> Management and Budget <strong>for</strong> revie and comment.The Corps <strong>the</strong>n completes <strong>the</strong> action.With respect to your concerns about <strong>the</strong> McClellan-Kerr Atkansas RiverNavigation Feasibility Study and Environmental Impact Statemen , <strong>the</strong> Little RockDistrict has prepared a detailed response to address <strong>the</strong> items inyour originalPetition. That response is now in <strong>the</strong> final stages <strong>of</strong> processing.tPDnled an @ Recycled Paper


I have asked <strong>the</strong> Corps Headquarters to commit to respon ing with <strong>the</strong>final response to you by September 15, 2007. Please feel free tomay be <strong>of</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r assistance.Very truly yours,"I~ /<strong>Assistant</strong> <strong>Secretary</strong> ~ <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Army</strong> z ~u' (Civil Works)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!