443. Defence Witness DIX testified that her father lent his vehicle to the Accused andhelped him ensure security in the commune during this period. Witness DIX testified thatshe was at home in Taba and heard all the news but that she did not hear anything aboutrape or sexual violence during the killings which took place. However, she said that shereceived all her in<strong>for</strong>mation from her parents and neighbours and did not once go to thebureau communal after the killings started. She said that she herself saw the Accused justone time, in April. According to her testimony, she did not speak to him at that time, andhas never spoken to him at any other time. Nevertheless, Witness DIX expressed theopinion that the Accused had committed no crime, and she was surprised that he was inprison. Defence Witness DJX, a minor and the brother of Witness DIX, also testified thathe did not hear anything about rape and he did not see any cases of rape. The Chambernotes that the written statements of these two witnesses, prepared and submitted by theDefence, are identical. Witness DJX was twelve years old at the time of the events, andlike Witness DIX, he testified that he did not go to the bureau communal during thisperiod. He said he saw the Accused two times.444. Witness DFX testified that she was never a witness to acts of rape or sexual violencein Taba and that she never even heard anyone talk about them. The Chamber notes thatthis witness, who is a protected witness, has a close personal relationship to theDefendant. She testified, on examination by the Chamber, that the Accused did not tellher what was happening at the bureau communal, that she did not ask him, and that hersource of in<strong>for</strong>mation was from other people. On cross-examination by the Prosecution,she testified that she herself never went to the bureau communal during this period <strong>for</strong>security reasons. On examination by the Chamber, the Witness acknowledged that in herwritten statement submitted by the Defence she had mentioned reports that theInterahamwe were abducting beautiful Tutsi girls and taking them home as mistresses.She conceded that such conduct could be considered sexual violence as it was notconsensual.445. Defence Witness DEEX, a Tutsi woman, testified that be<strong>for</strong>e killing women theInterahamwes raped them. Asked whether the Accused encouraged or authorized them inthis sexual violence, she said she did not know. On cross-examination, she said that shedid not personally witness sexual violence, although she heard that the girls at the houseof the family where she had taken refuge were raped by the Interahamwe. Witness DEEXtestified that she was given a laissez-passer by the Accused, which helped her to movearound safely.446. The Accused himself testified that he was completely surprised by the allegations ofrape in Taba during the events which took place. He asserted that anyone saying that evena single woman was raped at the bureau communal was lying. While he acknowledgedthat some witnesses had testified that they were raped at the bureau communal, he swore,in the name of God, that the charge was made up. He said he never saw, and never heardfrom his policemen, that any woman was raped at the bureau communal. He said that heheard about rape accusations over Radio <strong>Rwanda</strong> and that women's associations hadorganized demonstrations and a march from Kigali to Taba. He suggested that perhapsthis was intended to make the Chamber understand that in Taba women were raped at the
ureau communal, but he insisted that women were never raped within the premises ofthe bureau communal or on land belonging to the bureau communal or the commune.447. In his testimony, the Accused recalled the allegation that he had <strong>for</strong>ced a young girl,Chantal, to march naked. He said he did not know her and that it never took place. Hesaid he would not do something like that. He referred to the account of a woman rapedwith a wooden stick as "savagery", questioning how a woman could witness such a thing,and he referred to the statement he had been accused of making at the entrance to thecultural center as "too much". He also testified that the cultural center building is suchthat it would be difficult to see what was going on inside from the door and that it wouldbe difficult <strong>for</strong> a woman lying down inside to know who is at the door. The Accusedtestified that there were women taking refuge all over and outside the bureau communaland that there were women in the cultural center. He denied that the Interahamwe broughtwomen to the cultural center. He said that some of the women who took refuge at thebureau communal were killed and others escaped.448. On examination by the Chamber, the Accused stated that he did hear about rapes inKigali but only after he was out of the country. When asked by the Chamber <strong>for</strong> areaction to the testimony of sexual violence, the Accused noted that rape was notmentioned in the pre-trial statements of Witness J and Witness H, although Witness Hsaid on examination by the Chamber that she had mentioned her rape to investigators.The Accused suggested that his Indictment was amended because of pressure from thewomen's movement and women in <strong>Rwanda</strong>, whom he described as "worked up to agreethat they have been raped." On examination by the Chamber, the Accused acknowledgedthat it was possible that rape might have taken place in the commune of Taba, but heinsisted that no rape took place at the bureau communal. He said he first learned of therape allegations in Taba at the Chamber and maintained that the charges were an"invented accusation.Factual Findings449. Having carefully reviewed the testimony of the Prosecution witnesses regardingsexual violence, the Chamber finds that there is sufficient credible evidence to establishbeyond a reasonable doubt that during the events of 1994, Tutsi girls and women weresubjected to sexual violence, beaten and killed on or near the bureau communal premises,as well as elsewhere in the commune of Taba. Witness H, Witness JJ, Witness OO, andWitness NN all testified that they themselves were raped, and all, with the exception ofWitness OO, testified that they witnessed other girls and women being raped. Witness J,Witness KK and Witness PP also testified that they witnessed other girls and womenbeing raped in the commune of Taba. Hundreds of Tutsi, mostly women and children,sought refuge at the bureau communal during this period and many rapes took place on ornear the premises of the bureau communal - Witness JJ was taken by Interahamwe fromthe refuge site near the bureau communal to a nearby <strong>for</strong>est area and raped there. Shetestified that this happened often to other young girls and women at the refuge site.Witness JJ was also raped repeatedly on two separate occasions in the cultural center onthe premises of the bureau communal, once in a group of fifteen girls and women and
- Page 2 and 3:
1.2. The Indictment1.3. Jurisdictio
- Page 4 and 5:
eports2 which indicated that acts o
- Page 6 and 7:
3. Jean Paul AKAYESU, born in 1953
- Page 8 and 9:
16. Jean Paul AKAYESU, on or about
- Page 10 and 11:
Counts 7-8(Crimes Against Humanity)
- Page 12 and 13:
c) Deliberately inflicting on the g
- Page 14 and 15:
1.4. The Trial1.4.1. Procedural Bac
- Page 16 and 17:
y the opening statement for the Def
- Page 18 and 19:
y the Tribunal for crimes related t
- Page 20 and 21:
38. Regarding the Gishyeshye meetin
- Page 22 and 23:
witness was lying because he or she
- Page 24 and 25:
in the commune. His de facto author
- Page 26 and 27:
70. Apart from asking the prefect t
- Page 28 and 29:
84. According to the testimony of D
- Page 30:
Scores of political leaders were im
- Page 33 and 34:
his listeners to avoid the error of
- Page 35 and 36:
111. The killing of Tutsi which hen
- Page 37 and 38:
killed on the grounds that the foet
- Page 39 and 40:
128. In conclusion, it should be st
- Page 41 and 42:
Witness statements137. During the t
- Page 43 and 44:
protection of witnesses issued by t
- Page 45 and 46:
covered anyone who had anti-Tutsi t
- Page 47 and 48:
Tutsi and the Tutsi were accused of
- Page 49 and 50:
as "two armies", "two belligerents"
- Page 51 and 52:
"The primary criterion for [definin
- Page 53 and 54:
180. Many witnesses testified regar
- Page 55 and 56:
stated in that Decision, it did not
- Page 57 and 58:
deeds. For these reasons, the Chamb
- Page 59 and 60:
Concerning the allegation that at l
- Page 61 and 62:
turned over alive to Akayesu, and t
- Page 63 and 64:
younger brothers. He stated that he
- Page 65 and 66: 237. Karangwa testified under cross
- Page 67 and 68: three brothers lie on their stomach
- Page 69 and 70: known as Usuri (phonetic spelling)
- Page 71 and 72: Karangwa's explanation for the inco
- Page 73 and 74: Count 3, Crimes against Humanity (e
- Page 75 and 76: those killed were professors from R
- Page 77 and 78: 290. Witness DCC for the Defence, d
- Page 79 and 80: children, and old people. The Chamb
- Page 81 and 82: further that he had not heard of Ak
- Page 83 and 84: to fetch the one who remains', a pr
- Page 85 and 86: sector councillors called on the cr
- Page 87 and 88: According to witness A, the bourgme
- Page 89 and 90: present took it to mean that the Tu
- Page 91 and 92: 355. The Accused himself confirmed
- Page 93 and 94: 364. Paragraph 15 of the Indictment
- Page 95 and 96: The witness said a certain Françoi
- Page 97 and 98: has not been proved beyond reasonab
- Page 99 and 100: who had come to his house. He said
- Page 101 and 102: Interahamwe at the entrance, carryi
- Page 103 and 104: ack to the bureau communal and on t
- Page 105 and 106: Victim Y (Witness N), a [68] year o
- Page 107 and 108: which were at times committed by mo
- Page 109 and 110: communal into a forest in the area
- Page 111 and 112: clubbing a young teacher who had be
- Page 113 and 114: 434. Two days after arriving at the
- Page 115: he went into hiding during the mass
- Page 119 and 120: taken away from the bureau communal
- Page 121 and 122: The Accused himself testified that
- Page 123 and 124: 464. In that case, when the matter
- Page 125 and 126: "A person who planned, instigated,
- Page 127 and 128: involve facilitating the commission
- Page 129 and 130: 493. In accordance with the said pr
- Page 131 and 132: Deliberately inflicting on the grou
- Page 133 and 134: y a psychological relationship betw
- Page 135 and 136: Chamber notes that, as stated above
- Page 137 and 138: • complicity by procuring means,
- Page 139 and 140: 547. Consequently, where a person i
- Page 141 and 142: underscoring their commitment to se
- Page 143 and 144: character134. In fact, the concept
- Page 145 and 146: 575. The definition of crimes again
- Page 147 and 148: grounds mentioned in Article 3 of t
- Page 149 and 150: accepted definition of this term in
- Page 151 and 152: adopted primarily to protect the vi
- Page 153 and 154: 610. Whilst the Chamber is very muc
- Page 155 and 156: description, namely, what constitut
- Page 157 and 158: forces to plan and carry out concer
- Page 159 and 160: 635. There is no clear provision on
- Page 161 and 162: 7.2. Count 5 - Crimes against human
- Page 163 and 164: 663. The definition of crimes again
- Page 165 and 166: 677. The Tribunal notes that eviden
- Page 167 and 168:
685. In the light of its factual fi
- Page 169 and 170:
692. The Tribunal finds, under Arti
- Page 171 and 172:
determine, as far as each proven fa
- Page 173 and 174:
the Tutsi in general. Akayesu who h
- Page 175 and 176:
722. As regards the allegations in
- Page 177 and 178:
732. The rape of Tutsi women was sy
- Page 179 and 180:
Chamber finds beyond a reasonable d
- Page 181 and 182:
Footnote 11. Decision: Order for Co
- Page 183 and 184:
Footnote 41. Article 104 of the Loi
- Page 185 and 186:
Footnote 68. Dictionnaire Rwandais-
- Page 187 and 188:
Footnote 103. "Principles of Intern
- Page 189 and 190:
Footnote 134. Secretary General's R
- Page 191:
Footnote 171. See General Legal Fin