682. The <strong>Tribunal</strong> finds that the following acts committed by the Accused or by others inthe presence of the Accused, at his instigation or with his consent or acquiescence,constitute torture:(i) the interrogation of Victim U, under threat to her life, by the Accused at the bureaucommunal, on 19 April 1994;(ii) the beating of Victim Y outside of her house by the Accused and Mugenzi on 20April 1994;(iii) the interrogation of Victim Y, under threat to her life, by the Accused, and thebeating of Victim Y under interrogation by Mugenzi, in the presence of the Accused, at amine at Buguli on 20 April 1994;(iv) the interrogation of Victim W, under threat to her life, at a mine at Buguli by theAccused, on 20 April 1994;(v) the beating of Victim Z under interrogation by the Accused, and by Mugenzi andFrancois in the presence of the Accused, in Gishyeshye Sector, on 20 April 1994;(vi) the <strong>for</strong>cing of Victim Z to beat Victim Y under interrogation, by Francois in thepresence of the Accused, in Gishyeshye Sector, on 20 April 1994;(vii) the beating of Victim Z and Victim V by Mugenzi and Francois and theinterrogation of Victim V, under threat to his life, by the Accused outside the house ofVictim V, on 20 April 1994;683. Accordingly, the <strong>Tribunal</strong> finds the Accused criminally responsible on Count 11under Article 6(1) of its Statute <strong>for</strong> commission of the following acts of torture as crimesagainst humanity under Article 3(a) of its Statute:(i) his interrogation of Victim U, under threat to her life, at the bureau communal on 19April 1994;(ii) his beating of Victim Y, outside of her house, on 20 April 1994;(iii) his interrogation of Victim Y, under threat to her life, at a mine at Buguli on 20 April1994;(iv) his interrogation of Victim W, under threat to her life, at a mine at Buguli on 20 April1994;(v) his beating of Victim Z in Gishyeshye Sector, on 20 April 1994;(vi) his interrogation of Victim V, under threat to his life, outside of his house, on 20April 1994.684. The <strong>Tribunal</strong> finds the Accused criminally responsible on Count 11 under Article6(1) of its Statute <strong>for</strong> implicitly ordering, as well as instigating, aiding and abetting, thefollowing acts of torture, which were committed in his presence by men acting on hisbehalf, as crimes against humanity under Article 3(a) of its Statute:(i) the beating of Victim Y outside of her house by Mugenzi on 20 April 1994;(ii) the beating of Victim Y, under interrogation, by Mugenzi, at a mine at Buguli on 20April 1994;(iii) the beating of Victim Z, under interrogation, by Mugenzi and Francois, inGishyeshye Sector on 20 April 1994;(iv) the <strong>for</strong>cing of Victim Z to beat Victim Y, under interrogation, by Francois, inGishyeshye Sector on 20 April 1994.7.7. Count 13 (rape) and Count 14 (other inhumane acts) - Crimes againstHumanity
685. In the light of its factual findings with regard to the allegations of sexual violence set<strong>for</strong>th in paragraphs 12A and 12B of the Indictment, the <strong>Tribunal</strong> considers the criminalresponsibility of the Accused on Count 13, crimes against humanity (rape), punishable byArticle 3(g) of the Statute of the <strong>Tribunal</strong> and Count 14, crimes against humanity (otherinhumane acts), punishable by Article 3(i) of the Statute.686. In considering the extent to which acts of sexual violence constitute crimes againsthumanity under Article 3(g) of its Statute, the <strong>Tribunal</strong> must define rape, as there is nocommonly accepted definition of the term in international law. The <strong>Tribunal</strong> notes thatmany of the witnesses have used the term "rape" in their testimony. At times, theProsecution and the Defence have also tried to elicit an explicit description of whathappened in physical terms, to document what the witnesses mean by the term "rape".The <strong>Tribunal</strong> notes that while rape has been historically defined in national jurisdictionsas non-consensual sexual intercourse, variations on the <strong>for</strong>m of rape may include actswhich involve the insertion of objects and/or the use of bodily orifices not considered tobe intrinsically sexual. An act such as that described by Witness KK in her testimony -the Interahamwes thrusting a piece of wood into the sexual organs of a woman as she laydying - constitutes rape in the <strong>Tribunal</strong>'s view.687. The <strong>Tribunal</strong> considers that rape is a <strong>for</strong>m of aggression and that the centralelements of the crime of rape cannot be captured in a mechanical description of objectsand body parts. The <strong>Tribunal</strong> also notes the cultural sensitivities involved in publicdiscussion of intimate matters and recalls the painful reluctance and inability of witnessesto disclose graphic anatomical details of sexual violence they endured. The UnitedNations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatmentor Punishment does not catalogue specific acts in its definition of torture, focusing ratheron the conceptual framework of state-sanctioned violence. The <strong>Tribunal</strong> finds thisapproach more useful in the context of international law. Like torture, rape is used <strong>for</strong>such purposes as intimidation, degradation, humiliation, discrimination, punishment,control or destruction of a person. Like torture, rape is a violation of personal dignity, andrape in fact constitutes torture when it is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with theconsent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity.688. The <strong>Tribunal</strong> defines rape as a physical invasion of a sexual nature, committed on aperson under circumstances which are coercive. The <strong>Tribunal</strong> considers sexual violence,which includes rape, as any act of a sexual nature which is committed on a person undercircumstances which are coercive. Sexual violence is not limited to physical invasion ofthe human body and may include acts which do not involve penetration or even physicalcontact. The incident described by Witness KK in which the Accused ordered theInterahamwe to undress a student and <strong>for</strong>ce her to do gymnastics naked in the publiccourtyard of the bureau communal, in front of a crowd, constitutes sexual violence. The<strong>Tribunal</strong> notes in this context that coercive circumstances need not be evidenced by ashow of physical <strong>for</strong>ce. Threats, intimidation, extortion and other <strong>for</strong>ms of duress whichprey on fear or desperation may constitute coercion, and coercion may be inherent incertain circumstances, such as armed conflict or the military presence of Interahamweamong refugee Tutsi women at the bureau communal. Sexual violence falls within the
- Page 2 and 3:
1.2. The Indictment1.3. Jurisdictio
- Page 4 and 5:
eports2 which indicated that acts o
- Page 6 and 7:
3. Jean Paul AKAYESU, born in 1953
- Page 8 and 9:
16. Jean Paul AKAYESU, on or about
- Page 10 and 11:
Counts 7-8(Crimes Against Humanity)
- Page 12 and 13:
c) Deliberately inflicting on the g
- Page 14 and 15:
1.4. The Trial1.4.1. Procedural Bac
- Page 16 and 17:
y the opening statement for the Def
- Page 18 and 19:
y the Tribunal for crimes related t
- Page 20 and 21:
38. Regarding the Gishyeshye meetin
- Page 22 and 23:
witness was lying because he or she
- Page 24 and 25:
in the commune. His de facto author
- Page 26 and 27:
70. Apart from asking the prefect t
- Page 28 and 29:
84. According to the testimony of D
- Page 30:
Scores of political leaders were im
- Page 33 and 34:
his listeners to avoid the error of
- Page 35 and 36:
111. The killing of Tutsi which hen
- Page 37 and 38:
killed on the grounds that the foet
- Page 39 and 40:
128. In conclusion, it should be st
- Page 41 and 42:
Witness statements137. During the t
- Page 43 and 44:
protection of witnesses issued by t
- Page 45 and 46:
covered anyone who had anti-Tutsi t
- Page 47 and 48:
Tutsi and the Tutsi were accused of
- Page 49 and 50:
as "two armies", "two belligerents"
- Page 51 and 52:
"The primary criterion for [definin
- Page 53 and 54:
180. Many witnesses testified regar
- Page 55 and 56:
stated in that Decision, it did not
- Page 57 and 58:
deeds. For these reasons, the Chamb
- Page 59 and 60:
Concerning the allegation that at l
- Page 61 and 62:
turned over alive to Akayesu, and t
- Page 63 and 64:
younger brothers. He stated that he
- Page 65 and 66:
237. Karangwa testified under cross
- Page 67 and 68:
three brothers lie on their stomach
- Page 69 and 70:
known as Usuri (phonetic spelling)
- Page 71 and 72:
Karangwa's explanation for the inco
- Page 73 and 74:
Count 3, Crimes against Humanity (e
- Page 75 and 76:
those killed were professors from R
- Page 77 and 78:
290. Witness DCC for the Defence, d
- Page 79 and 80:
children, and old people. The Chamb
- Page 81 and 82:
further that he had not heard of Ak
- Page 83 and 84:
to fetch the one who remains', a pr
- Page 85 and 86:
sector councillors called on the cr
- Page 87 and 88:
According to witness A, the bourgme
- Page 89 and 90:
present took it to mean that the Tu
- Page 91 and 92:
355. The Accused himself confirmed
- Page 93 and 94:
364. Paragraph 15 of the Indictment
- Page 95 and 96:
The witness said a certain Françoi
- Page 97 and 98:
has not been proved beyond reasonab
- Page 99 and 100:
who had come to his house. He said
- Page 101 and 102:
Interahamwe at the entrance, carryi
- Page 103 and 104:
ack to the bureau communal and on t
- Page 105 and 106:
Victim Y (Witness N), a [68] year o
- Page 107 and 108:
which were at times committed by mo
- Page 109 and 110:
communal into a forest in the area
- Page 111 and 112:
clubbing a young teacher who had be
- Page 113 and 114:
434. Two days after arriving at the
- Page 115 and 116: he went into hiding during the mass
- Page 117 and 118: ureau communal, but he insisted tha
- Page 119 and 120: taken away from the bureau communal
- Page 121 and 122: The Accused himself testified that
- Page 123 and 124: 464. In that case, when the matter
- Page 125 and 126: "A person who planned, instigated,
- Page 127 and 128: involve facilitating the commission
- Page 129 and 130: 493. In accordance with the said pr
- Page 131 and 132: Deliberately inflicting on the grou
- Page 133 and 134: y a psychological relationship betw
- Page 135 and 136: Chamber notes that, as stated above
- Page 137 and 138: • complicity by procuring means,
- Page 139 and 140: 547. Consequently, where a person i
- Page 141 and 142: underscoring their commitment to se
- Page 143 and 144: character134. In fact, the concept
- Page 145 and 146: 575. The definition of crimes again
- Page 147 and 148: grounds mentioned in Article 3 of t
- Page 149 and 150: accepted definition of this term in
- Page 151 and 152: adopted primarily to protect the vi
- Page 153 and 154: 610. Whilst the Chamber is very muc
- Page 155 and 156: description, namely, what constitut
- Page 157 and 158: forces to plan and carry out concer
- Page 159 and 160: 635. There is no clear provision on
- Page 161 and 162: 7.2. Count 5 - Crimes against human
- Page 163 and 164: 663. The definition of crimes again
- Page 165: 677. The Tribunal notes that eviden
- Page 169 and 170: 692. The Tribunal finds, under Arti
- Page 171 and 172: determine, as far as each proven fa
- Page 173 and 174: the Tutsi in general. Akayesu who h
- Page 175 and 176: 722. As regards the allegations in
- Page 177 and 178: 732. The rape of Tutsi women was sy
- Page 179 and 180: Chamber finds beyond a reasonable d
- Page 181 and 182: Footnote 11. Decision: Order for Co
- Page 183 and 184: Footnote 41. Article 104 of the Loi
- Page 185 and 186: Footnote 68. Dictionnaire Rwandais-
- Page 187 and 188: Footnote 103. "Principles of Intern
- Page 189 and 190: Footnote 134. Secretary General's R
- Page 191: Footnote 171. See General Legal Fin