13.07.2015 Views

9-3 laminar flat-plate boundary layer: exact solution - Université d ...

9-3 laminar flat-plate boundary layer: exact solution - Université d ...

9-3 laminar flat-plate boundary layer: exact solution - Université d ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9-3 LAMINAR FLAT-PLATE BOUNDARY LAYER: EXACT SOLUTION S-399-3 LAMINAR FLAT-PLATE BOUNDARY LAYER: EXACT SOLUTIONThe <strong>solution</strong> for the <strong>laminar</strong> <strong>boundary</strong> <strong>layer</strong> on a horizontal <strong>flat</strong> <strong>plate</strong> was obtained byPrandtl’s student H. Blasius [2] in 1908. For two-dimensional, steady, incompressibleflow with zero pressure gradient, the governing equations of motion (Eqs. 5.27) reduceto [3]∂u∂ + ∂ vx ∂ y= 0(9.3)∂uu u u∂ x∂ y∂v 2∂y(9.4)with <strong>boundary</strong> conditionsat y 0, u 0, v 0at y , u U,∂u(9.5) 0∂yEquations 9.3 and 9.4, with <strong>boundary</strong> conditions Eq. 9.5 are a set of nonlinear, coupled,partial differential equations for the unknown velocity field u and v. To solvethem, Blasius reasoned that the velocity profile, u/U, should be similar for all valuesof x when plotted versus a nondimensional distance from the wall; the <strong>boundary</strong><strong>layer</strong>thickness, , was a natural choice for nondimensionalizing the distance fromthe wall. Thus the <strong>solution</strong> is of the formuy= g ( ) where ∝U(9.6)Based on the <strong>solution</strong> of Stokes [4], Blasius reasoned that xUand set2U = y xWe now introduce the stream function, , whereu = ∂ =− ∂ and v∂y ∂x(9.7)(5.4)satisfies the continuity equation (Eq. 9.3) identically. Substituting for u and v into Eq.9.4 reduces the equation to one in which is the single dependent variable. Defininga dimensionless stream function asf( )= xU(9.8)makes f() the dependent variable and the independent variable in Eq. 9.4. With definedby Eq. 9.8 and defined by Eq. 9.7, we can evaluate each of the terms in Eq. 9.4.The velocity components are given byuxU df U= ∂ = ∂ ∂= = U df∂y∂∂yd xd(9.9)


S-40 CHAPTER 9 / EXTERNAL INCOMPRESSIBLE VISCOUS FLOWandv =− ∂ ⎡=−⎢∂x⎣ xU∂ f ∂ x+12U⎤ ⎡⎥ =−⎢x f⎦ ⎣df ⎛ 1 1 xU − ⎞d⎝ 2 x⎠ + 12U⎤⎥x f⎦or1 U ⎡ df ⎤v = ⎢− f2 x ⎣ d ⎥⎦By differentiating the velocity components, it also can be shown thatand∂uU d f=− ∂x2xd 2∂u= U U x d 2f2∂ydSubstituting these expressions into Eq. 9.4, we obtain232 3d f3∂ u U2=∂y x d(9.10)d f23+ f d f2= 0(9.11)ddwith <strong>boundary</strong> conditions:dfat = 0, f = = 0ddfat →∞ , = 1(9.12)dThe second-order partial differential equations governing the growth of the <strong>laminar</strong><strong>boundary</strong> <strong>layer</strong> on a <strong>flat</strong> <strong>plate</strong> (Eqs. 9.3 and 9.4) have been transformed to a nonlinear,third-order ordinary differential equation (Eq. 9.11) with <strong>boundary</strong> conditionsgiven by Eq. 9.12. It is not possible to solve Eq. 9.11 in closed form; Blasius solved itusing a power series expansion about 0 matched to an asymptotic expansion for : . The same equation later was solved more precisely—again using numericalmethods—by Howarth [5], who reported results to 5 decimal places. The numericalvalues of f, df/d, and d 2 f/d 2 in Table 9.1 were calculated with a personal computerusing 4th-order Runge-Kutta numerical integration.The velocity profile is obtained in dimensionless form by plotting u/U versus ,using values from Table 9.1. The resulting profile is sketched in Fig. 9.3b. Velocityprofiles measured experimentally are in excellent agreement with the analytical <strong>solution</strong>.Profiles from all locations on a <strong>flat</strong> <strong>plate</strong> are similar; they collapse to a singleprofile when plotted in nondimensional coordinates.From Table 9.1, we see that at 5.0, u/U 0.992. With the <strong>boundary</strong>-<strong>layer</strong>thickness, , defined as the value of y for which u/U 0.99, Eq. 9.7 gives2250 . 50 . x ≈ =U x Re x(9.13)


9-3 LAMINAR FLAT-PLATE BOUNDARY LAYER: EXACT SOLUTION S-41Table 9.1The Function f() for the Laminar Boundary Layer along a Flat Plate atZero Incidence = yUxff ′ =uUfThen0 0 0 0.33210.5 0.0415 0.1659 0.33091.0 0.1656 0.3298 0.32301.5 0.3701 0.4868 0.30262.0 0.6500 0.6298 0.26682.5 0.9963 0.7513 0.21743.0 1.3968 0.8460 0.16143.5 1.8377 0.9130 0.10784.0 2.3057 0.9555 0.06424.5 2.7901 0.9795 0.03405.0 3.2833 0.9915 0.01595.5 3.7806 0.9969 0.00666.0 4.2796 0.9990 0.00246.5 4.7793 0.9997 0.00087.0 5.2792 0.9999 0.00027.5 5.7792 1.0000 0.00018.0 6.2792 1.0000 0.0000The wall shear stress may be expressed as∂u⎤w U U x d f ⎤=∂y⎥ =2 ⎥⎦d⎦y= 0 = 02w= 0.332UU x =0.332URex2(9.14)and the wall shear stress coefficient, C f , is given byCf w=2=U120.664Rex(9.15)EXAMPLE 9.2Each of the results for <strong>boundary</strong>-<strong>layer</strong> thickness, , wall shear stress, w , andskin friction coefficient, C f , Eqs. 9.13 through 9.15, depends on the length Reynoldsnumber, Re x , to the one-half power. The <strong>boundary</strong>-<strong>layer</strong> thickness increases as x 1/2 ,and the wall shear stress and skin friction coefficient vary as 1/x 1/2 . These resultscharacterize the behavior of the <strong>laminar</strong> <strong>boundary</strong> <strong>layer</strong> on a <strong>flat</strong> <strong>plate</strong>.Laminar Boundary Layer on a Flat Plate: Exact SolutionUse the numerical results presented in Table 9.1 to evaluate the following quantitiesfor <strong>laminar</strong> <strong>boundary</strong>-<strong>layer</strong> flow on a <strong>flat</strong> <strong>plate</strong>:(a) */ (for 5 and as : ).(b) v/U at the <strong>boundary</strong>-<strong>layer</strong> edge.(c) Ratio of the slope of a streamline at the <strong>boundary</strong>-<strong>layer</strong> edge to the slope of versus x.


S-42 CHAPTER 9 / EXTERNAL INCOMPRESSIBLE VISCOUS FLOWEXAMPLE PROBLEM 9.2GIVEN: Numerical <strong>solution</strong> for <strong>laminar</strong> <strong>flat</strong>-<strong>plate</strong> <strong>boundary</strong> <strong>layer</strong>, Table 9.1.FIND:(a) * / (for 5 and as : ).(b) v/U at <strong>boundary</strong>-<strong>layer</strong> edge.(c) Ratio of the slope of a streamline at the <strong>boundary</strong>-<strong>layer</strong> edge to the slope of versus x.SOLUTION:The displacement thickness is defined by Eq. 9.1 as* =⎛−⎞≈⎛−⎞∫ ∞ u1 10 ⎝ U ⎠dy u∫0⎝ U ⎠dyIn order to use the Blasius <strong>exact</strong> <strong>solution</strong> to evaluate this integral, we need to convert it from one involving u andUy to one involving f ( u/U) and variables. From Eq. 9.7, x x= y , so y = and dy = d xUUThus, * max xmax= ( 1− f ) = ( 1−) (1)∫0 U d xfdU ∫0Note: Corresponding to the upper limit on y in Eq. 9.1, max , or max 5.From Eq. 9.13,5 ≈U xso if we divide each side of Eq. 1 by each side of Eq. 9.13, we obtain (with f df/d)1 ⎛ df ⎞= ⎜1− ⎟ d5 ∫0⎝ d⎠* maxIntegrating givesEvaluating at max 5, we obtain * 1= [ − f ( ) ]max50The quantity f() becomes constant for 7. Evaluating at max 8 gives*Thus, * : is 0.24 percent larger than * 5 From Eq. 9.10,*1* = ( 5. 0 − 3. 2833) = 0.343 ( = 5 )5 ←⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯1= (. 8 0 − 6. 2792) = 0.3445*( →∞)←⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ⎯⎯1 U⎛ df ⎞ vv = ⎜ −⎝ ⎠⎟ = 1 ⎛ df⎜⎝− ⎞ 1 ⎛ df f , so f ⎟ = ⎜ −2 x d U 2 Ux d ⎠ 2 Re ⎝ d x⎞f ⎟⎠


9-3 LAMINAR FLAT-PLATE BOUNDARY LAYER: EXACT SOLUTION S-43Evaluating at the <strong>boundary</strong>-<strong>layer</strong> edge ( 5), we obtainv 10. 837 0.84v= [(. 5 0 9915) − 3. 2833]= ≈ ( = 5)U 2 Rex Rex Rex←⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯U ⎯Thus v is only 0.84 percent of U at Re x 10 4 , and only about 0.12 percent of U at Re x 5 10 5 .The slope of a streamline at the <strong>boundary</strong>-<strong>layer</strong> edge isdy⎞v v 084 .= = ≈dx ⎠streamline u U Re xThe slope of the <strong>boundary</strong>-<strong>layer</strong> edge may be obtained from Eq. 9.13,so5 ≈ = 5U x xUd 1 −12= 5 x = 25 . =dx U 2Ux25 .Re xdyThus⎞dx ⎠streamline084 . dddy⎞= = 0.33625 . dx dxdx ⎠streamline←⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯This result indicates that the slope of the streamlines is about 1/3 of the slope of the <strong>boundary</strong> <strong>layer</strong>edge—the streamlines penetrate the <strong>boundary</strong> <strong>layer</strong>, as sketched below:UUuδThis problem illustrates use of numerical data from the Blasius<strong>solution</strong> to obtain other information on a <strong>flat</strong> <strong>plate</strong> <strong>laminar</strong><strong>boundary</strong> <strong>layer</strong>, including the result that the edge of the<strong>boundary</strong> <strong>layer</strong> is not a streamline.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!