12. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONSThe resources needed to provide <strong>the</strong> CPA at <strong>the</strong> hospitals varies significantly depending on <strong>the</strong>level <strong>of</strong> hospital (CPA 1, 2 or 3) and <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> occupied beds. Based on <strong>the</strong> norms andassuming a BOR <strong>of</strong> 85%, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> staff needed to operate a hospital varies from 49persons <strong>for</strong> a 40-bed CPA 1 hospital to 255 persons <strong>for</strong> a 250-bed CPA 3 hospital. The annualcost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hospitals would range from around $200,000 <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> 40-bed CPA 1 hospital toaround $1.1 million <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> 250-bed CPA 3 hospital.These figures are sensitive to <strong>the</strong> staffing ratios used. For example, <strong>for</strong> CPA 1 hospitals weused normative ratios <strong>of</strong> 1 MD/MA to 8 occupied beds, 1 nurse to 2.8 beds and 1 midwife to 7.5beds (based on <strong>the</strong> CPA Guidelines). Using those ratios a 60 bed CPA 1 hospital would need atotal <strong>of</strong> 60 staff and a budget <strong>of</strong> around $260,000. If we change <strong>the</strong> staffing ratios to 1 MD/MAto 16 occupied beds, 1 nurse <strong>for</strong> 5.6 beds and 1 midwife <strong>for</strong> 15 beds, <strong>the</strong> total number <strong>of</strong> staffwould be reduced to 45 and <strong>the</strong> budget to around $234,000. However, this reduction is likely toaffect quality <strong>of</strong> care. It should be noted that <strong>the</strong> staffing numbers are fixed <strong>for</strong> certaincategories <strong>of</strong> staff, such as laboratory technicians, where a minimum number is needed to run ahospital.The cost per capita depends on <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> catchment population, <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> hospital, and<strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> occupied beds. For a 60-bed CPA 1 hospital serving a population <strong>of</strong> 100,000people <strong>the</strong> per capita cost would be $2.62. For an 80-bed CPA 2 hospital serving a catchmentpopulation <strong>of</strong> 200,000 people <strong>the</strong> per capita cost would be $1.88. For a CPA 3 hospital servinga province <strong>of</strong> 2,000,000 people and acting as a second-level provincial referral hospital, <strong>the</strong> percapita cost would be $0.59 cents. This last figure would have to be added to <strong>the</strong> per capita cost<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> various district hospitals in <strong>the</strong> province to arrive at a total hospital per capita cost <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>province. Note that we did not have norms <strong>for</strong> numbers <strong>of</strong> beds per thousand population and<strong>the</strong>se figures do not, <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e, represent normative per capita costs.The normative cost per inpatient day equivalent (IDE) would range from $13.19 at a 60-bedCPA 1 hospital to $17.53 at a 100-bed CPA 3 hospital. The cost per IDE <strong>of</strong> a CPA 3 hospitalwould be less <strong>for</strong> larger hospitals due to economies <strong>of</strong> scale. At <strong>the</strong> same CPA 1 hospital,assuming an ALOS <strong>of</strong> 4.6 days this would translate to an average cost <strong>of</strong> $60.70 per admission.At <strong>the</strong> 100 bed CPA 3 hospital with an ALOS <strong>of</strong> 7.3 days <strong>the</strong> average cost per admission wouldbe $127.96.The HSP 2 targets could not be translated into specific hospital targets <strong>for</strong> all services. The HSP2 costing assumed that increases in hospital services would be necessary but that <strong>the</strong>se couldbe provided to some degree through greater and more efficient use <strong>of</strong> existing capacity. Thisseems reasonable since <strong>the</strong>re is a significant gap between <strong>the</strong> average BOR <strong>of</strong> 68% <strong>for</strong> all CPAhospitals in 2007 and <strong>the</strong> optimal BOR <strong>of</strong> 85%, meaning that more inpatients can be treatedwithout having to increase <strong>the</strong> numbers <strong>of</strong> beds. Lowering <strong>the</strong> average ALOS from <strong>the</strong> nationalaverage <strong>of</strong> 7.4 days in 2007 to <strong>the</strong> rates achieved in <strong>the</strong> sample <strong>of</strong> contracting hospital wouldallow even more inpatients to be treated.However, <strong>the</strong> additional cost <strong>of</strong> bringing <strong>the</strong> resources <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> existing hospitals up to <strong>the</strong>normative levels would be significant, especially <strong>for</strong> staffing. For example, Ang Roka Hospital, a60-bed CPA 1 hospital in Takeo Province, had a BOR <strong>of</strong> 84% and an ALOS <strong>of</strong> 4.6 days in 2007and was already operating at close to optimal capacity. However, it only had 26 staff and spent26
$175,231 in that year, whereas according to <strong>the</strong> norms it should have had 59 staff and a budget<strong>of</strong> around $258,000.As ano<strong>the</strong>r example, Prey Chhor Hospital, a 70-bed CPA 1 hospital in Kampong ChamProvince, had a BOR <strong>of</strong> 61% and an ALOS <strong>of</strong> 6.3 days in 2007. It had 28 staff and spent$170,160 in that year, whereas <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> services that it provided it should have had 54staff and a budget <strong>of</strong> around $227,000. However, if it operated at optimal capacity and reducedits ALOS to 4.6 days it would treat twice as many inpatients but would require 65 staff and abudget <strong>of</strong> around $290,000.The funding <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample <strong>of</strong> contracting hospitals used <strong>for</strong> this study came from a variety <strong>of</strong>sources. Between 67% and 83% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> funds came from <strong>the</strong> Government, most <strong>of</strong> which was indrugs and supplies. User fees, health equity funds and health insurance made up between 12%and 24% <strong>of</strong> total funding. Direct donor assistance made up between 5% and 9% <strong>of</strong> totalfunding. A portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Government funding and <strong>the</strong> health equity funds are also donorfunded. Depending on <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Government to finance <strong>the</strong> increased costs it is likelythat a significant portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> increased funds needed would have to come from user fees andinsurance and from donors, at least in <strong>the</strong> short term.Both <strong>the</strong> actual 2007 costs and <strong>the</strong> normative costs estimated in this study are significantlyhigher than <strong>the</strong> costs used in <strong>the</strong> second child survival costing study and in HSP 2, and may behigher than figures used in estimating <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reproductive health, HIV/AIDS and TBstrategic plans. The strategic plan costs need to be reviewed and, if necessary, adjusted.The costing model can be used to estimate a budget <strong>for</strong> any referral hospital. However, it isimportant to note that <strong>the</strong>se costs are rough estimates. The following recommendations aremade regarding improving <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> this in<strong>for</strong>mation.• For this study <strong>the</strong> staffing norms were developed from ranges shown in CPA Guidelinesand drug and supply costs were based on actual amounts provided to <strong>the</strong> hospitals.They may not reflect accurately <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hospitals and <strong>the</strong>y do not take intoaccount differences in patient mix. These figures should be reviewed by <strong>the</strong> MOH andan analysis and determination <strong>of</strong> standard clinical practices should also be carried out todevelop more accurate staffing norms and standard drug and clinical supply needs.• The figures used <strong>for</strong> staff remuneration were based on averages <strong>of</strong> actual payments at<strong>the</strong> sample <strong>of</strong> hospitals. These figures should be reviewed and, if necessary, adjusted.• A more detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> operating costs would also be advisable, since it ispossible that some aspects, such as maintenance, are underfunded and that this maynot have been fully taken into account by <strong>the</strong> hospital directors when <strong>the</strong>y estimated <strong>the</strong>additional funds needed.We also recommend that <strong>the</strong> HSP2 targets be translated into specific service delivery targets.This will assist <strong>the</strong> health centers and hospitals to set targets that will result in <strong>the</strong> achievement<strong>of</strong> HSP2 goals.27