Volume 5 Winter 2011 Number 2 - Charleston Law Review

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2011] Attorney Billable Hourcriticisms, both from clients and the legal profession itself, onlyincrease.What billing method may eventually come to replace thehourly fee is not clear, but, as the saying goes, if somethingcannot go on forever, it will not.191
ERRORS IN JUDGMENT OR HOW TO GETDEBTS DISCHARGED IN BANKRUPTCY“(IL)LEGALLY”: A MATTER OF NOTICEGloria J. Liddell Pearson Liddell, Jr. **I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................... 194II. BANKRUPTCY CODE REQUIREMENTS TOCONDUCT ADVERSARIAL PROCEEDINGS ................. 198A. The Nature of Adversary Proceedings ........................ 1981. In General ................................................................ 1982. How Adversary Proceedings Are Conducted inBankruptcy Cases: Notice Requirements .............. 1993. Adversary Proceedings to DetermineDischargeability of Student Loans ......................... 201B. Adversary Proceedings to Determine the Validity,Priority, or Extent of a Lien ......................................... 203III. BANKRUPTCY NOTICE TO CREDITORREQUIREMENTS .............................................................. 204IV. LEGAL VERSUS ACTUAL NOTICE IN ANALOGOUSTYPES OF PROCEEDINGS .............................................. 207A. Service of Process ......................................................... 2091. Indiana—Actual Notice Wins ................................. 2092. Louisiana—Legal Notice Wins ............................... 212 Gloria J. Liddell, Assistant Professor, Business Law, Mississippi StateUniversity; J.D., Howard University, 1976; M.A.T., Clinical LegalEducation, Antioch University, 1985; B.S., Mathematics, District ofColumbia Teachers College, 1973. We wish to acknowledge the valuableeditorial assistance given to us by our brilliant son, Joshua Nelson Liddell, whohas gone to be with the Lord. He was an extraordinarily talented young manwho particularly enjoyed critiquing and editing our works. We loved him andmiss him dearly.Pearson Liddell, Jr., Associate Professor, Business Law, MississippiState University; J.D., Howard University, 1975; B.S., Accounting,Central (Ohio) State University, 1971.193
Page 1 and 2:
!!!!!!"#$%&'!(!!!!!)*+,'-!./00!!!!!
Page 3 and 4:
CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5last
Page 5 and 6:
CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5case
Page 7 and 8:
CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5II.
Page 9 and 10: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5A. A
Page 11 and 12: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5that
Page 13 and 14: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5theo
Page 15 and 16: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5The
Page 17 and 18: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5and
Page 19 and 20: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5lear
Page 21 and 22: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5they
Page 23 and 24: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5meas
Page 25 and 26: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5the
Page 27 and 28: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5refl
Page 29 and 30: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5styl
Page 31 and 32: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5flir
Page 35 and 36: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5acqu
Page 37 and 38: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5sugg
Page 39 and 40: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5like
Page 41 and 42: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5clas
Page 43 and 44: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5this
Page 45 and 46: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5allo
Page 47 and 48: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5bein
Page 49 and 50: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5Star
Page 51 and 52: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5in t
Page 53 and 54: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5ince
Page 55 and 56: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5That
Page 57 and 58: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5impo
Page 59: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5lode
Page 63 and 64: 2011] Errors in Judgmentthere are s
Page 65 and 66: 2011] Errors in Judgmentof Bankrupt
Page 67 and 68: 2011] Errors in Judgmentthe Rules t
Page 69 and 70: 2011] Errors in Judgment3. Adversar
Page 71 and 72: 2011] Errors in Judgmentsuch an eff
Page 73 and 74: 2011] Errors in Judgmentof the nume
Page 75 and 76: 2011] Errors in Judgmentexcepting f
Page 77 and 78: 2011] Errors in Judgmentshould have
Page 79 and 80: 2011] Errors in Judgmentdirectors.
Page 81 and 82: 2011] Errors in JudgmentBridgewater
Page 83 and 84: 2011] Errors in Judgmentcan produce
Page 85 and 86: 2011] Errors in Judgmentstate. 153
Page 87 and 88: 2011] Errors in Judgmentpersonal re
Page 89 and 90: 2011] Errors in Judgmentwas nullifi
Page 91 and 92: 2011] Errors in Judgment$10,718. 21
Page 93 and 94: 2011] Errors in Judgmentwhat the ge
Page 95 and 96: 2011] Errors in Judgmentrights. 245
Page 97 and 98: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5B. T
Page 99 and 100: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5§ 1
Page 101 and 102: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5term
Page 103 and 104: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5trus
Page 107 and 108: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5sati
Page 109 and 110: CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5On t
Page 111 and 112:
CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5nonc
Page 113 and 114:
CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5that
Page 115 and 116:
CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5As a
Page 117 and 118:
CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5will
Page 119 and 120:
CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5In a
Page 121 and 122:
CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5has
Page 123 and 124:
CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5inte
Page 125 and 126:
CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5exce
Page 127 and 128:
CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5C. A
Page 129 and 130:
CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5corp
Page 131 and 132:
CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5base
Page 133 and 134:
CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5use
Page 135 and 136:
CHARLESTON LAW REVIEW [Volume 5rate
Page 137 and 138:
SCHULZE FINAL.doc1/20/2011 6:14PMCH
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
show all

Volume 5 Winter 2011 Number 2 - Charleston Law Review

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?