Volume 5 Winter 2011 Number 2 - Charleston Law Review

2011] Errors in Judgmentrights. 245Debtors, nonetheless, should not become complacent. As theauthors’ analysis of Schwab demonstrates, there is at least anindication that the Court may view varying circumstancesthrough a lens that may appear inconsistent with prior rulings.With so much potentially at stake, debtors should not want theircase, with all that may be hanging in the balance, to be the testcase that provides a basis for distinction and departure from theprinciples of Espinosa.245. E.g., United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa, 559 U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 1367 (2010).227