13.07.2015 Views

Collision Efficiencies of Ice Crystals at Low–Intermediate Reynolds ...

Collision Efficiencies of Ice Crystals at Low–Intermediate Reynolds ...

Collision Efficiencies of Ice Crystals at Low–Intermediate Reynolds ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

15 APRIL 2000 WANG AND JI1005FIG. 3. Shape <strong>of</strong> collision cross sections for a hexagonal ice pl<strong>at</strong>e<strong>at</strong> Re 20, colliding with supercooled droplets <strong>of</strong> radius r. The fixedhexagon is the cross section <strong>of</strong> the ice pl<strong>at</strong>e: (a) r 3 m, (b) r 5 m, (c) r 11 m, and (d) r 27 m.microstructure <strong>of</strong> clouds instead <strong>of</strong> intrinsic collisionmechanism (Pruppacher and Klett 1997).As the drop size increases, the efficiency increasesrapidly. The efficiency reaches a peak or a pl<strong>at</strong>eau, dependingon the <strong>Reynolds</strong> number <strong>of</strong> the ice crystal, andthen drops <strong>of</strong>f sharply for further increasing drop size.The drop <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> efficiency is apparently due to the increasingterminal velocity <strong>of</strong> the droplet. When the collectorice crystal and the droplet have about the samevelocity, collision is nearly impossible and the efficiencybecomes very small (Pitter and Pruppacher 1974; Pitter1977; Martin et al. 1981; Pruppacher and Klett 1997).The efficiency maxima take the shape <strong>of</strong> peaks in smaller-Recases but become broader pl<strong>at</strong>eaus as the ice crystalRe increases, apparently because the larger crystalscan collide with droplets <strong>of</strong> broader size range and maintainfairly high efficiencies. Due to their sizes, smallercrystals are quickly ‘‘outrun’’ by droplets as dropletsbecome larger and hence are unable to perform the collision.FIG. 4. Same as Fig. 3 except for a broad-branch crystal <strong>at</strong> Re 35: (a) r 5 m, (b) r 9 m, (c) r 15 m, and (d) r 36m.The collision efficiencies <strong>of</strong> broad-branch crystals arein general smaller than those <strong>of</strong> hexagonal pl<strong>at</strong>es <strong>at</strong> thesame <strong>Reynolds</strong> number. The maximum efficiencies inthe pl<strong>at</strong>eau region are about 0.9, unlike the case <strong>of</strong> hexagonalpl<strong>at</strong>es, whose maximum efficiencies are near 1.0.This is probably due to the more open structure <strong>of</strong> abroad-branch crystal th<strong>at</strong> would allow the droplet to‘‘slip through’’ the gap between branches. The width <strong>of</strong>the ‘‘pl<strong>at</strong>eau’’ is also much narrower than the corre-b. Broad-branch crystalsFigure 7 shows the collision efficiency for broadbranchcrystals colliding with supercooled droplets. Themain fe<strong>at</strong>ures are similar to those for hexagonal pl<strong>at</strong>es.The collision efficiency for Re 1.0 is practically zero,representing an inability to rime. This cut<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> rimingability will be discussed further below.FIG. 5. Same as Fig. 3 except for a columnar ice crystal <strong>at</strong> Re 2.0: (a) r 4 m, (b) r 6 m, (c) r 35 m, and (d) r 43m.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!