13.07.2015 Views

Collision Efficiencies of Ice Crystals at Low–Intermediate Reynolds ...

Collision Efficiencies of Ice Crystals at Low–Intermediate Reynolds ...

Collision Efficiencies of Ice Crystals at Low–Intermediate Reynolds ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1008 JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCESVOLUME 57FIG. 10. Cut <strong>of</strong>f riming ice crystal sizes as extrapol<strong>at</strong>ed by the present results. For broad-branchcrystals, the d<strong>at</strong>a point for crystal radius 2.5 m was ignored when obtaining the best fit.value (Devulapalli and Collett 1994; Collett and Xu1999, personal communic<strong>at</strong>ion). Results <strong>of</strong> collision efficienciescomputed in the present study can be used topredict the cut<strong>of</strong>f riming crystal size. This is done byplotting the maximum collision efficiency (the peakpoint <strong>of</strong> each curve in Figs. 6–8) as a function <strong>of</strong> crystalsize for each crystal habit, as shown in Fig. 10. Thepoint where the extrapol<strong>at</strong>ed curve intersects with thex axis (where E 0) indic<strong>at</strong>es the cut<strong>of</strong>f size <strong>of</strong> icecrystal below which riming would not occur. Using thismethod, we determine th<strong>at</strong> the riming cut<strong>of</strong>f size is 35m for columnar ice crystals, 110 m for hexagonalpl<strong>at</strong>es, and 200 m for broad-branch crystals. Thesevalues are close to the observ<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> Wilkins and Auer(1970), Reinking (1979), and Bruntjes et al. (1987), assummarized in Table 4.4. Conclusions and outlooksThe collision efficiencies <strong>of</strong> three types <strong>of</strong> ice crystalscolliding with supercooled w<strong>at</strong>er drops are computedand presented above. The main improvements in thepresent study over previous studies are as follows.1) More realistic ice crystal shapes are adopted, especiallythe finite length <strong>of</strong> the columns and the broadbranchcrystals whose efficiencies have never reportedbefore.2) More accur<strong>at</strong>e flow fields, including the 3D and unsteadyfe<strong>at</strong>ures, are used to determine the grazingtrajectories.The improvements have been demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed by the moreaccur<strong>at</strong>e prediction <strong>of</strong> the captured droplet sizes and thecut<strong>of</strong>f riming crystal sizes. We believe the improvedcollision efficiency values will lead to more accur<strong>at</strong>egrowth-r<strong>at</strong>e calcul<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> ice particles in clouds.The results presented in this paper pertain to rel<strong>at</strong>ivelysmall and pristine ice crystals colliding with small supercooleddroplets, so they are mainly applicable to initialstages <strong>of</strong> riming process when ice particles have notgrown too much. When riming has been going on fora longer time, the ice crystal gradually loses its pristineTABLE 4. Observed critical riming size. The code after the crystal habit is the Magono and Lee (1966) classific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> n<strong>at</strong>ural snowcrystals.Crystal habitWilkins and Auer(1970)Reinking(1979)Bruntjes et al.(1987)Hexagonal pl<strong>at</strong>e (Pla)Broad-branch crystal (Plc)Columnar crystal (Cle)Long solid column (Nle)——l 100 m, d 40 ml 100 m, d 30 m—d 275 m——d 150 md 240 ml 125 m, d 40 m—

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!