2. Examine to what extent non-crop habitats encourage or inhibit the movement <strong>and</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>natural</strong><strong>enemies</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>pests</strong>. In particular, the extent to which they also affect reinvasion <strong>of</strong> fields following insecticidetreatment.3. Determine whether habitats under ES are harbouring pest populations <strong>and</strong> whether these are subsequentlyincreasing the risk <strong>of</strong> crop losses.7.2 Natural <strong>enemies</strong>1. Investigate the biology <strong>and</strong> especially diet <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the more abundant <strong>natural</strong> <strong>enemies</strong> about whichlittle is known. Specifically:a. diet/prey selection <strong>of</strong> beetle larvae <strong>and</strong> <strong>their</strong> predation <strong>of</strong> <strong>pests</strong>, especially the overwintering stages.b. diet <strong>of</strong> predatory flies e.g. Histeridae, Hybotidae, Dolichopodidae <strong>and</strong> Emididaec. Identify those <strong>natural</strong> <strong>enemies</strong> that contribute to the control <strong>of</strong> those <strong>pests</strong> most frequently requiringinsecticide treatments e.g. pollen beetle.d. Using information above to then identify ways to enhance the most efficient <strong>natural</strong> <strong>enemies</strong>.2. Examine the movement <strong>of</strong> <strong>natural</strong> <strong>enemies</strong>, especially following insecticide applications <strong>and</strong> for thosespecies (especially parasitoids) emerging in unsuitable crops.7.3 IPM1. Investigate the use <strong>of</strong> reduced insecticide dosages to preserve <strong>natural</strong> <strong>enemies</strong> in conjunction with theimpact on reliability <strong>and</strong> persistence <strong>of</strong> pest control.2. Investigate the potential to reduce insecticide impacts using application technology.3. Examine the recovery <strong>of</strong> <strong>natural</strong> <strong>enemies</strong> following insecticide applications, the impact <strong>of</strong> scale <strong>of</strong>treatment <strong>and</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> the surrounding l<strong>and</strong>scape.4. Compare the effects <strong>of</strong> different cultivation systems on <strong>pests</strong> overwintering within the soil <strong>and</strong> the survival<strong>of</strong> <strong>their</strong> parasitoids.67
8. ReferencesAdis, J. (1979) Problems <strong>of</strong> interpreting <strong>arthropod</strong> sampling with pitfall traps. Zoologischer Anzeiger Jena,202, 177-184.Alex<strong>and</strong>er C.J., Holl<strong>and</strong> J.M., Winder L., & Perry J.N. (2005) Performance <strong>of</strong> sampling strategies in thepresence <strong>of</strong> known insect spatial pattern. Annals <strong>of</strong> Applied Biology, 146, 361-370.Alford, D. V. (2003) Biocontrol <strong>of</strong> oilseed rape <strong>pests</strong>. Blackwell Science, Oxford.Altieri, M. A. & Letourneau, D. K. (1982) Vegetation management <strong>and</strong> biological control in agroecosystems.Crop Protection, 1, 405-430.Andersen, A. (1997) Densities <strong>of</strong> overwintering carabids <strong>and</strong> staphylinids (Col., Carabidae <strong>and</strong>Staphylinidae) in cereal <strong>and</strong> grass fields <strong>and</strong> <strong>their</strong> boundaries. Journal Applied Entomology, 121, 77-80.Andersen, A. (1999) Plant protection in spring cereal production with reduced tillage. II. Pests <strong>and</strong> beneficialinsects. Crop Protection, 18, 651-657.Anonymous (1918). Report on the occurrence <strong>of</strong> insect <strong>and</strong> fungus <strong>pests</strong> on plants in Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Wales inthe year 1917. Board <strong>of</strong> Agriculture <strong>and</strong> Fisheries, London.Anonymous (2001) Ecological evaluation <strong>of</strong> the arable stewardship Pilot Scheme, 1998-2000. Report toMAFF by ADAS Consulting ltd., Centre for L<strong>and</strong> Use & Water Resources, University <strong>of</strong> Newcastle,Edward Grey Institute <strong>of</strong> Field Ornithology, University <strong>of</strong> Oxford, The Game Conservancy Trust.Bach, C. E. (1988) Effects <strong>of</strong> host plant patch size on herbivore density: underlying mechanisms. Ecology,69, 1103-1117.Baines, M., Hambler, C., Johnson, P. J., Macdonald, D. W. & Smith, H. (1998) The effects <strong>of</strong> arable fieldmargin management on the abundance <strong>and</strong> species richness <strong>of</strong> Araneae (Spiders). Ecography, 21, 74-86.Barnes, H.F. (1956) Gall midges <strong>of</strong> economic importance. In Gall Midges <strong>of</strong> Cereal Crops. Vol VII (ed H. F.Barnes), pp. 40-80. Crosby, Lockwood & Son, London.Basedow, T. (1973) Der Einfluss epigaischer Raub<strong>arthropod</strong>en auf die Abundanz phytophager Inseckten inder Agrarl<strong>and</strong>schaft. Pedobiologia., 13, 410-422.Bell, J. R., Johnson, P. J., Hambler, C., Haughton, A. J., Smith, H., Feber, R. E., Tattersall, F. H., Hart, B. H.,Manley, W. & Macdonald, D. W. (2002) Manipulating the abundance <strong>of</strong> Lepthyphantes tenuis(Araneae: Linyphiidae) by field margin management. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 93,295-304.Berry, P., Ogilvy, S. & Gardner, S.M. (2004) Integrated farming <strong>and</strong> biodiversity. English Nature ResearchReport 634. English Nature, Peterborough.68
- Page 1 and 2:
Research Review No. 64June 2007Pric
- Page 3 and 4:
4.4 Manipulation of natural enemies
- Page 5 and 6:
AbstractPressure to reduce insectic
- Page 7 and 8:
1. IntroductionInsect pest of cerea
- Page 10 and 11:
higher in ‘new’ areas.Rape wint
- Page 12 and 13:
Potential damage can be caused by t
- Page 14 and 15:
loss than the winter generation whi
- Page 16 and 17:
2.12 ‘Wessex’ flea beetle (Psyl
- Page 18 and 19: Cabbage stem flea beetles hatch at
- Page 20 and 21: 4. Review of cereal pest natural en
- Page 23 and 24: midgeContarinia tritici Larva/Pupa
- Page 25 and 26: Cereal ground beetle No infoZabrus
- Page 27 and 28: Myzus persicae Coleoptera Cantharid
- Page 29 and 30: Delia radicum Egg/Larva/Pupa Many C
- Page 31 and 32: Diospilus oleraceus Hymenoptera Bra
- Page 33 and 34: (Biocontrol of Oilseed Rape Insect
- Page 35 and 36: Dolichopodidae (La)Damp areas/Soil/
- Page 37 and 38: 2002). Nevertheless, there have bee
- Page 39 and 40: Therevidae (Stiletto flies) 2 1 2 2
- Page 41 and 42: and further work to examine their d
- Page 43 and 44: ate of repopulation depends on many
- Page 45 and 46: Table 6. Resources provided for nat
- Page 47 and 48: (Crateagus mongyna) supported 209 i
- Page 49 and 50: densities varied enormously between
- Page 51 and 52: in prep). Likewise other studies of
- Page 53 and 54: compared to other cereal crops (Hol
- Page 55 and 56: Wildbird cover can develop a rich u
- Page 57 and 58: females select species with appropr
- Page 59 and 60: Skylark plots were found to support
- Page 61 and 62: Carabid abundance was higher 8m int
- Page 63 and 64: 6. Conclusions on potential of Envi
- Page 65 and 66: Where no noxious weeds or volunteer
- Page 67: conducted in isolation because of t
- Page 71 and 72: Chambers, R. J., Sunderland, K. D.,
- Page 73 and 74: Frampton, G. K., Cilgi, T., Fry, G.
- Page 75 and 76: Holland, J. M., Perry, J. N. & Wind
- Page 77 and 78: Meek, B., Loxton, D., Sparks, T., P
- Page 79 and 80: Sotherton, N. W. (1985) The distrib
- Page 81 and 82: oilseed rape across Europe. The BCP
- Page 83 and 84: 2001 More late August drilled winte
- Page 85 and 86: 1998 August drillings emerged rapid
- Page 87 and 88: Oilseed rapeHarvest Review - pest h
- Page 89 and 90: favoured rapid crop development and
- Page 91 and 92: Harvest year 2005. Substantial reco
- Page 93 and 94: Harvest years 2004 and 2003. Limite
- Page 95 and 96: Harvest year 2005. Low numbers of o
- Page 97 and 98: Harvest year 2006. Moderate to high
- Page 99 and 100: Harvest year 2007 (to date). Increa
- Page 101 and 102: Appendix 4. Current and recent comp
- Page 103 and 104: LINK funded projects - current25 Ma
- Page 105 and 106: Appendix 5. List of British researc