13.07.2015 Views

Variation to permit a fence setback 0 feet from ... - Village of Palatine

Variation to permit a fence setback 0 feet from ... - Village of Palatine

Variation to permit a fence setback 0 feet from ... - Village of Palatine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALSSEPTEMBER 14 2010PAGE 31 The Special Use shall substantially conform <strong>to</strong> the site plan attached here<strong>to</strong> as Exhibit A and theelevations attached here<strong>to</strong> as Exhibit B except as such plans may be changed <strong>to</strong> conform <strong>to</strong><strong>Village</strong> Codes and OrdinancesThere were no audience commentsMr Wheeler asked Staff if this project would have been approved if it had been submitted prior <strong>to</strong>installation Staff could not conclude at this time Recommendation is based on the current requestThere were no further comments <strong>from</strong> the petitioner The public hearing was closedDELIBERATIONSMr Wheeler stated he was unsure that the work would have been approved prior <strong>to</strong> construction Thelack <strong>of</strong> grass could go <strong>to</strong> the standard <strong>of</strong> reasonable return and unique circumstance He made amotion <strong>to</strong> approve with Staff s conditions 2nd by Mr McGinnMs Roth Wurster felt that 50 <strong>of</strong> lot coverage can affect the neighboring properties Another option <strong>to</strong>this problem was <strong>to</strong> use mulch which she herself has used in a similar situation with good resultsThere is <strong>to</strong>o much impervious area on this lot and the standards were not metMr Kendall felt the standard for unique circumstances had not been metMr McGuinn stated there could have been a reduction <strong>of</strong> lot coverage if the required <strong>permit</strong> had beenrequested prior <strong>to</strong> the work being doneVote4 Ayes 2 Nays Kendall Roth WursterIII 1047 1910 N Rand RoadThis item was continued <strong>to</strong> the September 28 2010 ZBA meeting

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!