13.07.2015 Views

civil liability of good samaritans and volunteers - Law Reform ...

civil liability of good samaritans and volunteers - Law Reform ...

civil liability of good samaritans and volunteers - Law Reform ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

volunteering activities. Thus, a Good Samaritan or volunteer may be covered insuch situations by the 1961 Act.4.05 Unlike motor insurance, there is no compulsory requirement inrespect <strong>of</strong> the insurance <strong>of</strong> public <strong>liability</strong> risks. As Buckley notes, 2 individuals<strong>and</strong> commercial concerns may, therefore, decide whether or not to insureagainst <strong>liability</strong> to members <strong>of</strong> the public in respect <strong>of</strong> injury or damage toproperty caused by their negligence. Where they choose to do so, he notesthat the general public <strong>liability</strong> policy insures against the risk <strong>of</strong> legal <strong>liability</strong> topay compensation for accidental personal injury, or physical damage to materialproperty. 3 It should be noted, in this regard, that the indemnity provided by ageneral public <strong>liability</strong> policy relates only to legal <strong>liability</strong> arising from anaccidental event or occurrence resulting in personal injury, illness, disease, loss<strong>of</strong> or damage to property <strong>of</strong> third parties. 44.06 Buckley notes the difficulty encountered by the courts in defining theterm “accidental.” 5 While much will ultimately depend on the wording <strong>of</strong> theparticular policy, Buckley asserts that the rationale for using the word is toensure that only unexpected <strong>and</strong> unintended events, as opposed to deliberateacts or omissions, are covered by the policy. In the course <strong>of</strong> determining theintention <strong>of</strong> one particular public <strong>liability</strong> policy the Supreme Court, in RohanConstruction Ltd v Insurance Corporation <strong>of</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong> Ltd, 6 accepted thestatement <strong>of</strong> Lord Lindley in Fenton v Thorley & Co Ltd. 7 that:“The word „accident‟ is not a technical legal term with a clearlydefined meaning. Speaking generally, but with reference to legalliabilities, an accident means an unintended <strong>and</strong> unexpectedoccurrence which produces hurt or loss. But it is <strong>of</strong>ten used todenote any unintended <strong>and</strong> unexpected loss or hurt apart from itscause; <strong>and</strong> if the cause is not known the loss or hurt itself wouldcertainly be called an accident. The word „accident‟ is also <strong>of</strong>tenused to denote both the cause <strong>and</strong> the effect, no attempt being madeto discriminate between them. The great majority <strong>of</strong> what are calledaccidents is occasioned by carelessness; but for legal purposes it is234567Buckley, Insurance <strong>Law</strong>, 2 nd ed (Thomson Roundhall 2006) at paragraph 10.01.Ibid at paragraph 10.02.Ibid at paragraph 10.02.Ibid at paragraphs 10.02-10.08.[1986] ILRM 373.[1903] AC 443 at 448.86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!