- Page 1:
ReportCivil liabilityof goodsamarit
- Page 4 and 5:
LAW REFORM COMMISSION‟S ROLEThe L
- Page 6 and 7:
LAW REFORM RESEARCH STAFFDirector o
- Page 8 and 9:
CONTACT DETAILSFurther information
- Page 10 and 11:
TABLE OF CONTENTSINTRODUCTION 1A Re
- Page 12 and 13:
CHAPTER 5 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION
- Page 14 and 15:
Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provision
- Page 17 and 18:
TABLE OF CASESAlexandrou v Oxford [
- Page 19 and 20:
Kent v Griffiths [2001] QB 36 EngKi
- Page 21 and 22:
INTRODUCTIONARequest by the Attorne
- Page 23:
extent to which current law in Irel
- Page 26 and 27:
who may have had a “reasonable ex
- Page 28 and 29:
1.10 The 2006 Report of the Nationa
- Page 30 and 31:
Work had also been done on planning
- Page 32 and 33:
1.21 The Irish Government‟s 2000
- Page 34 and 35:
ecommendations to the Government on
- Page 36 and 37:
that the enactment of legislation s
- Page 38 and 39:
circumstances in which a duty to in
- Page 40 and 41:
Russia, Switzerland and a number of
- Page 42 and 43:
inconvenience to the would-be-rescu
- Page 44 and 45:
2.18 Lord Atkin then went on to exp
- Page 46 and 47:
intervene and rescue. 39 This has b
- Page 48 and 49:
a duty to control the conduct of ot
- Page 50 and 51:
voluntarily assumed responsibility
- Page 52 and 53:
competence and ability to treat the
- Page 54 and 55:
property in a public place and a ve
- Page 56 and 57:
is an occupational first-aider pres
- Page 58 and 59:
human being whose life is in peril
- Page 60 and 61:
without an option to avoid being su
- Page 62 and 63:
(d)Economic Arguments2.72 In Stovin
- Page 64 and 65:
(g)Indeterminate Number of ClaimsIn
- Page 66 and 67:
there is no greater legal basis for
- Page 69 and 70:
3CHAPTER 3DUTY OF CARE AND STANDARD
- Page 71 and 72:
whereby the courts may, as a matter
- Page 73 and 74:
conduct in the future. 18 In this w
- Page 75 and 76:
“Any person who intervenes volunt
- Page 77 and 78:
leaves the victim in a worse positi
- Page 79 and 80:
Samaritan could be held liable for
- Page 81 and 82:
3.36 It must also be borne in mind
- Page 83 and 84:
permissible in the case of ordinary
- Page 85 and 86:
scenarios where there is a lack of
- Page 87 and 88:
Commission observes that a finding
- Page 89 and 90:
In this regard, it is noted that th
- Page 91 and 92:
escuer, a quality service is provid
- Page 93 and 94: 3.74 Where the undertaking is a pro
- Page 95 and 96: volunteer fails to turn up, it is v
- Page 97 and 98: equivalent services. Furthermore, t
- Page 99 and 100: precedent for future claims against
- Page 101 and 102: would seem to imply that the standa
- Page 103 and 104: that it was unlikely that liability
- Page 105 and 106: 4CHAPTER 4THE CONTENTS OF THE GOOD
- Page 107 and 108: often important to distinguish care
- Page 109 and 110: made those decisions, transfers to
- Page 111 and 112: condition that the Good Samaritan a
- Page 113 and 114: defined “render” as “[t]o giv
- Page 115 and 116: 4.24 The Commission notes that some
- Page 117 and 118: equirement of rendering emergency c
- Page 119 and 120: statutes in the United States, whil
- Page 121 and 122: property is not included. To the ex
- Page 123 and 124: 4.41 In the Australian Capital Terr
- Page 125 and 126: surgical aid in case of urgent need
- Page 127 and 128: (2) General scope of legislation4.5
- Page 129 and 130: heart action or circulation of bloo
- Page 131 and 132: emergency contains in section 11 of
- Page 133 and 134: precise definition of “good faith
- Page 135 and 136: 4.82 In the Consultation Paper 135
- Page 137 and 138: the organisation‟s work in determ
- Page 139 and 140: 5CHAPTER 5SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION
- Page 141 and 142: APPENDIXDRAFT CIVIL LIABILITY (GOOD
- Page 143: DRAFT CIVIL LIABILITY (GOOD SAMARIT
- Page 147: Effect on common law and statutory