disciplinary handbook: volume v - Supreme Court - State of Ohio

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Thomas (3/24/2010)Williams (9/7/2011)Rule 1.4(a)(2) (reasonably consulting withclient about means to accomplishobjectives)Brueggeman (12/21/2010)Dundon (8/30/2011)Freeman (3/31/2011)Freeman (4/5/2011)Godles (12/27/2010)Grote (10/7/2010)Hoppel (6/8/2011)Kiesling (4/12/2010)Nittskoff (11/10/2011)Saunders (11/30/2010)Shuler (8/30/2011)Williams (9/7/2011)Rule 1.4(a)(3) (keeping client reasonablyinformed about status of matter)Boggs (6/7/2011)Brown (10/13/2011)Brueggeman (12/21/2010)Bursey (12/2/2009)Dundon (8/30/2011)Freeman (3/31/2011)Freeman (4/5/2011)Godles (12/27/2010)Gottehrer (3/17/2010)Gresley (12/22/2010)Grote (10/7/2010)Henry (12/22/2010)Hildebrand (12/1/2010)Hoppel (6/8/2011)Horan (8/27/2009)Kaplan (1/28/2010)Kizer (9/17/2009)Larson (12/30/2009)Minamyer (7/28/2011)Mishler (12/14/2010)Nittskoff (11/10/2011)Pfundstein (12/21/2010)Ranke (9/22/2011)Raso (6/22/2011)Rozanc (8/27/2009)Saunders (11/30/2010)Sayler (4/29/2010)Sherman (6/9/2010)Shuler (8/30/2011)Siehl (11/18/2009)Smith (12/3/2008)Thomas (3/24/2010)Van Sickle (2/24/2011)Williams (9/7/2011)Rule 1.4(a)(4) (complying as soon aspracticable with client’s reasonablerequests for information)Brown (3/25/2009)Brown (10/13/2011)Brueggeman (12/21/2010)Davis (3/18/2009)Dundon (8/30/2011)Godles (12/27/2010)Gresley (12/22/2010)Grote (10/7/2010)Freeman (3/31/2011)Freeman (4/5/2011)Hildebrand (12/1/2010)Horan (8/27/2009)Kaplan (1/28/2010)Kiesling (4/12/2010)Miller (7/20/2010)Minamyer (7/28/2011)Nittskoff (11/10/2011)Pfundstein (12/21/2010)Rozanc (8/27/2009)Saunders (11/30/2010)Sayler (4/29/2010)Shuler (8/30/2011)Siehl (11/18/2009)Smith (12/3/2008)Williams (9/7/2011)Index- 392Rule 1.4(a)(5) (consulting with clientabout limitations when client expectsunlawful assistance )Godles (12/27/2010)Rule 1.4(b) (explaining matters for clientsto make informed decisions regardingrepresentation)Nittskoff (11/10/2011)Patterson (12/2/2009)Rule 1.4(c) (informing clients ifprofessional-liability insurance isterminated)Boggs (6/7/2011)Character (6/23/2011)Godles (12/27/2010)Grote (10/7/2010)Harwood (4/7/2010)Hauck (7/7/2011)McNerney (5/28/2009)Miller (7/20/2010)Minamyer (7/28/2011)Ohlin (8/24/2010)Schiller (9/23/2009)Schramski (3/2/2010)Sherman (6/9/2010)Shuler (8/30/2011)Trainor (6/7/2011)Wittbrod (9/21/2011)
Rule 1.5(a) (charging or collecting anillegal or clearly excessive fee)Boggs (6/7/2011)Bursey (12/2/2009)Cantrell (5/20/2010)Character (6/23/2011)Clovis (5/5/2010)Gottehrer (3/17/2010)Hackett (6/30/2011)Henry (12/22/2010)Hildebrand (12/1/2010)Hoppel (6/8/2011)Jackson (11/30/2010)Miller (7/20/2010)Mishler (12/14/2010)Schiller (9/23/2009)Spector (3/18/2009)Rule 1.5(b) (communicating to the clientthe nature and scope of representationand the basis or rate of the fee andexpenses)Mishler (12/14/2010)Squire (11/3/2011)Rule 1.5(c) (contingent fee agreement)Mishler (12/14/2010)Rule 1.5(c)(2) (preparing closingstatement in contingent fee matter)Bursey (12/2/2009)Rule 1.5(d)(3) (“Earned upon Receipt” or”non-refundedable” fee)Dearfield (10/19/2011)Freedman (4/27/2011)Rule 1.5(e) (fee division with lawyers notin the same firm)McCord (4/7/2009)Rule 1.6(a) (revealing informationrelating to the representation of a client)Shaver (4/1/2009)Rule 1.7 (conflict of interest- currentclients)Longino (4/6/2011)Rule 1.7(a)(2) (conflict of interest arisingfrom lawyer’s responsibilities to anotherclient, a former client, a third person, orlawyer’s own personal interests)Bandman (5/20/2010)Detweiler (10/21/2010)Mamich (3/25/2010)Pheils (6/23/2011)Schmalz (8/25/2009)Siewert (11/23/2011)Index- 393Rule 1.7(b) (accepting/ continuingrepresentation if conflict of interestcreated, unless conditions met)Kiesling (4/12/2010)Pheils (6/23/2011)Rule 1.8(a) (entering a businesstransaction with a client)Kiesling (4/12/2010)Squire (11/3/2011)Rule 1.8(a)(1) (transaction and terms fairand reasonable and fully disclosed toclient in writing)Gibson (2/16/2011)Rule 1.8(a)(2) (advising client in writingof the desirability of seeking and givingreasonable opportunity to seekindependent legal counsel)Gibson (2/16/2011)Rule 1.8(a)(3) (informed consent to theessential terms of a transaction withlawyer)Gibson (2/16/2011)Rule 1.8(e) (providing financial assistanceto a client during representation)Pheils (6/23/2011)Ranke (9/22/2011)Rule 1.8(h)(1) (making agreementprospectively to limit liability formalpractice or requiring arbitration of aclaim)Mishler (12/14/2010)Rule 1.8(h)(2) (settling a potential claimfor professional liability without advisingclient in writing to seek counsel orobtaining client’s informed consent)Baker (5/28/2009)Mishler (12/14/2010)Wittbrod (7/28/2009)Rule 1.8(j) (soliciting or engaging insexual activity with a client when noprevious consensual sexual relationshipexisted)Bartels (3/25/2010)Detweiler (10/21/2010)Schmalz (8/25/2009)Siewert (11/23/2011)Rule 1.9(c)(2) (revealing information
Page 1:
The Supreme Court of OhioBoard of C
Page 5 and 6:
Drain, Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v.12
Page 7 and 8:
Horton, Disciplinary Counsel v.124
Page 9 and 10:
Markovich, Akron Bar Assn. v.117 Oh
Page 11 and 12:
Table of Cases- 9Ramos, Cleveland B
Page 13 and 14:
Table of Cases- 11Stuard, Becker, B
Page 15 and 16:
Case SummariesAllerding, Columbus B
Page 17 and 18:
Case Summaries- 15Archer, Northwest
Page 19 and 20:
Case Summaries- 17intermittently ov
Page 21 and 22:
Bartels, Allen Cty. Bar Assn. v.124
Page 23 and 24:
Blair, Disciplinary Counsel v.128 O
Page 25 and 26:
Case Summaries- 23Bowling, Discipli
Page 27 and 28:
Broschak, Disciplinary Counsel v.11
Page 29 and 30:
Brown, Dayton Bar Assn. v.124 Ohio
Page 31 and 32:
Brown, Allen Cty. Bar Assn. v.124 O
Page 33 and 34:
Brueggeman, Disciplinary Counsel v.
Page 35 and 36:
Bunstine, Disciplinary Counsel v.12
Page 37 and 38:
Bursey, Disciplinary Counsel v.124
Page 39 and 40:
Butler, Disciplinary Counsel v.128
Page 41 and 42:
Campbell, Disciplinary Counsel v.12
Page 43 and 44:
Cantrell, Disciplinary Counsel v.12
Page 45 and 46:
Cantrell, Disciplinary Counsel v.13
Page 47 and 48:
Case Summaries- 45abuse impede his
Page 49 and 50:
Case Summaries- 47respondent‘s de
Page 51 and 52:
Case Summaries- 49with a client if
Page 53 and 54:
Case Summaries- 51not DR 1-102(A)(5
Page 55 and 56:
Clovis, Columbus Bar Assn. v.125 Oh
Page 57 and 58:
Corrigan, Geauga Cty. Bar Assn. v.1
Page 59 and 60:
Cunningham, Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v
Page 61 and 62:
Davis, Disciplinary Counsel v.121 O
Page 63 and 64:
Dawson, Cleveland Metropolitan Bar
Page 65 and 66:
DeLoach, Akron Bar Assn. v.130 Ohio
Page 67 and 68:
Detweiler, Disciplinary Counsel v.1
Page 69 and 70:
DiCato, Akron Bar Assn. v.130 Ohio
Page 71 and 72:
DiMartino, Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn.
Page 73 and 74:
Doellman, Disciplinary Counsel v.12
Page 75 and 76:
Drain, Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v.12
Page 77 and 78:
Ellis, Columbus Bar Assn. v.120 Ohi
Page 79 and 80:
Emerson, Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.122
Page 81 and 82:
Farah, Toledo Bar Assn. v.125 Ohio
Page 83 and 84:
Farrell, Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.129
Page 85 and 86:
Fink, Akron Bar Assn. v.131 Ohio St
Page 87 and 88:
Folwell, Disciplinary Counsel v.129
Page 89 and 90:
Freedman, Akron Bar Assn. v.128 Ohi
Page 91 and 92:
Freeman, Disciplinary Counsel v.126
Page 93 and 94:
Freeman, Disciplinary Counsel v.119
Page 95 and 96:
Frost, Disciplinary Counsel v.122 O
Page 97 and 98:
Case Summaries- 95his goal of gaini
Page 99 and 100:
Gibson, Akron Bar Assn. v.128 Ohio
Page 101 and 102:
Glaeser, Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v.
Page 103 and 104:
Goldblatt, Disciplinary Counsel v.1
Page 105 and 106:
Gottehrer, Cleveland Metro. Bar Ass
Page 107 and 108:
Case Summaries- 105disgorgement of
Page 109 and 110:
Grote, Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.127 O
Page 111 and 112:
Hackett, Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.129
Page 113 and 114:
Case Summaries- 111presented eviden
Page 115 and 116:
Hanni, Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v.12
Page 117 and 118:
Hauck, Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.129 O
Page 119 and 120:
Heiland, Disciplinary Counsel v.116
Page 121 and 122:
Heisler, Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.119
Page 123 and 124:
Henry, Disciplinary Counsel v.127 O
Page 125 and 126:
Hickman, Toledo Bar Assn. v.119 Ohi
Page 127 and 128:
Hildebrand, Cleveland Metro. Bar As
Page 129 and 130:
Holda, Akron Bar Assn. v.125 Ohio S
Page 131 and 132:
Horan, Disciplinary Counsel v.123 O
Page 133 and 134:
Hoskins, Disciplinary Counsel v.119
Page 135 and 136:
Howard, Disciplinary Counsel v.123
Page 137 and 138:
Hunter, Columbus Bar Assn. v.130 Oh
Page 139 and 140:
Jackel, Ohio State Bar Assn. v.118
Page 141 and 142:
Jackson, Disciplinary Counsel v.127
Page 143 and 144:
Jaffe, Cleveland Metro Bar Assn. v.
Page 145 and 146:
Johnson, Toledo Bar Assn. v.121 Ohi
Page 147 and 148:
Johnson, Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v.
Page 149 and 150:
Johnston, Disciplinary Counsel v.12
Page 151 and 152:
Jones, Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v.12
Page 153 and 154:
Kaplan, Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn.
Page 155 and 156:
Kealy, Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v
Page 157 and 158:
Kellogg-Martin, Disciplinary Counse
Page 159 and 160:
Kelly, Disciplinary Counsel. v.121
Page 161 and 162:
Case Summaries- 159other assets in
Page 163 and 164:
Case Summaries- 161none of the mone
Page 165 and 166:
Case Summaries- 163Although the uns
Page 167 and 168:
Kubyn, Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v.121 Oh
Page 169 and 170:
Landis, Disciplinary Counsel v.124
Page 171 and 172:
Lapine, Disciplinary Counsel v.128
Page 173 and 174:
Larkin, Columbus Bar Assn. v.128 Oh
Page 175 and 176:
Case Summaries- 173Board‘s findin
Page 177 and 178:
Lawson, Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.119
Page 179 and 180:
Lawson, Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.130
Page 181 and 182:
Lentes, Disciplinary Counsel v.120
Page 183 and 184:
Lewis, Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v.121
Page 185 and 186:
Case Summaries- 183and blame the wo
Page 187 and 188:
Longino, Disciplinary Counsel v.128
Page 189 and 190:
Lowden, Toledo Bar Assn. v.117 Ohio
Page 191 and 192:
Case Summaries- 1898.4(h) by his ac
Page 193 and 194:
Mamich, Disciplinary Counsel v.125
Page 195 and 196:
Manning, Disciplinary Counsel v.119
Page 197 and 198:
Marosan, Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v.119
Page 199 and 200:
Martin, Toledo Bar Assn. v.131 Ohio
Page 201 and 202:
Mason, Toledo Bar Assn. v.118 Ohio
Page 203 and 204:
McAuliffe, Disciplinary Counsel v.1
Page 205 and 206:
McCord, Disciplinary Counsel v.121
Page 207 and 208:
McFaul, Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn.
Page 209 and 210:
Case Summaries- 207withdrawal. Resp
Page 211 and 212:
Case Summaries- 209that he is compe
Page 213 and 214:
Meade, Disciplinary Counsel v.127 O
Page 215 and 216:
Miller, Disciplinary Counsel v.126
Page 217 and 218:
Minamyer, Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v.1
Page 219 and 220:
Case Summaries- 217represent his cl
Page 221 and 222:
Case Summaries- 219became effective
Page 223 and 224:
Mitchell, Disciplinary Counsel v.12
Page 225 and 226:
Mullaney, Brooking, and Moeves, Cin
Page 227 and 228:
Murraine, Disciplinary Counsel v.13
Page 229 and 230:
Nance, Cleveland Metropolitan Bar A
Page 231 and 232:
Newcomer, Disciplinary Counsel v.11
Page 233 and 234:
Newman, Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.124
Page 235 and 236:
Niermeyer, Disciplinary Counsel v.1
Page 237 and 238:
Nittskoff, Disciplinary Counsel. v.
Page 239 and 240:
Case Summaries- 237Master Commissio
Page 241 and 242:
Ohlin, Disciplinary Counsel v.126 O
Page 243 and 244:
O’Malley, Disciplinary Counsel v.
Page 245 and 246:
Case Summaries- 243conditions that
Page 247 and 248:
Patterson, Geauga Cty. Bar Assn. v.
Page 249 and 250:
Peskin, Ohio State Bar Assn. v.125
Page 251 and 252:
Case Summaries- 249met by imposing
Page 253 and 254:
Plough, Disciplinary Counsel v.126
Page 255 and 256:
Podor, Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v
Page 257 and 258:
Portman, Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v.12
Page 259 and 260:
Potter, Disciplinary Counsel v.126
Page 261 and 262:
Pullins, Disciplinary Counsel v.127
Page 263 and 264:
Case Summaries- 261disqualification
Page 265 and 266:
Randall, Dayton Bar Assn. v.118 Ohi
Page 267 and 268:
Case Summaries- 265history, no dish
Page 269 and 270:
Raso, Disciplinary Counsel v.129 Oh
Page 271 and 272:
Resnick, Ohio State Bar Assn. v.128
Page 273 and 274:
Ricketts, Disciplinary Counsel v.12
Page 275 and 276:
Ridenbaugh, Disciplinary Counsel v.
Page 277 and 278:
Ritson, Toledo Bar Assn. v.127 Ohio
Page 279 and 280:
Roberts, Disciplinary Counsel v.117
Page 281 and 282:
Robinson, Disciplinary Counsel v.12
Page 283 and 284:
Rohrer, Disciplinary Counsel v.124
Page 285 and 286:
Rozanc, Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v.123 O
Page 287 and 288:
Rust, Toledo Bar Assn. v.124 Ohio S
Page 289 and 290:
Sabol, Disciplinary Counsel v.118 O
Page 291 and 292:
Case Summaries- 289condition of the
Page 293 and 294:
Sanz, Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.128 Oh
Page 295 and 296:
Saunders, Greene Cty. Bar Assn. v.1
Page 297 and 298:
Sayler, Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn.
Page 299 and 300:
Case Summaries- 2971.5(a), 1.16(d),
Page 301 and 302:
Schram, Dayton Bar Assn. v.122 Ohio
Page 303 and 304:
Scott, Toledo Bar Assn. v.129 Ohio
Page 305 and 306:
Shaw, Disciplinary Counsel v.126 Oh
Page 307 and 308:
Shea, Columbus Bar Assn. v.117 Ohio
Page 309 and 310:
Shuler, Disciplinary Counsel v.129
Page 311 and 312:
Siewert, Disciplinary Counsel. v.13
Page 313 and 314:
Simon, Disciplinary Counsel v.128 O
Page 315 and 316:
Smith, Disciplinary Counsel v.124 O
Page 317 and 318:
Smith, Disciplinary Counsel v.128 O
Page 319 and 320:
Smithern, Akron Bar Assn. v.125 Ohi
Page 321 and 322:
Squire, Disciplinary Counsel v.130
Page 323 and 324:
Stafford, Disciplinary Counsel v.12
Page 325 and 326:
Stoll, Erie-Huron Grievance Commt.
Page 327 and 328:
Stuard, Becker, and Bailey, Discipl
Page 329 and 330:
Taylor, Disciplinary Counsel v.120
Page 331 and 332:
Theisler, Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v
Page 333 and 334:
Thomas, Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn.
Page 335 and 336:
Case Summaries- 333court entered an
Page 337 and 338:
Trainor, Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.129
Page 339 and 340:
Troxell, Columbus Bar Assn. v.129 O
Page 341 and 342:
Troy, Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v.130 Ohi
Page 343 and 344: Case Summaries- 341professionals in
Page 345 and 346: Vivyan, Disciplinary Counsel v.125
Page 347 and 348: Case Summaries- 345offenses, there
Page 349 and 350: Walker, Disciplinary Counsel v.119
Page 351 and 352: Weisberg, Toledo Bar Assn. v.124 Oh
Page 353 and 354: Case Summaries- 351Chandlers to dis
Page 355 and 356: Williams, Disciplinary Counsel v.13
Page 357 and 358: Williamson, Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v
Page 359 and 360: Wineman, Disciplinary Counsel v.121
Page 361 and 362: Wittbrod, Akron Bar Assn. v.130 Ohi
Page 363 and 364: Yeager, Disciplinary Counsel v.123
Page 365 and 366: Zaffiro, Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn.
Page 367 and 368: Zigan, Disciplinary Counsel v.118 O
Page 369 and 370: Bennett (2/4/2010) (unlawfullystruc
Page 371 and 372: Clovis (5/5/2010) (as required by G
Page 373 and 374: on inactive status and while under
Page 375 and 376: suspension, and remanded to board t
Page 377 and 378: violations for attempt to dismiss a
Page 379 and 380: Wineman (5/6/2009)Wolanin (4/1/2009
Page 381 and 382: Willette (3/20/2008)DR 2-103(C) (re
Page 383 and 384: Patterson (12/2/2009)Ryan (8/27/200
Page 385 and 386: DR 7-102(A)(5) (knowingly making fa
Page 387 and 388: DR 9-102(B)(4) (failure to promptly
Page 389 and 390: Dearfield (10/19/2011)DeLoach (8/31
Page 391 and 392: McNerney (5/28/2009)(term suspensio
Page 393: Hoppel (6/8/2011)Hunter (11/15/2011
Page 397 and 398: Gottehrer (3/17/2010)Gresley (12/22
Page 399 and 400: Marshall (2/12/2009)Martin (12/15/2
Page 401 and 402: Meade (12/22/2010)Medley (1/27/2011
show all

disciplinary handbook: volume v - Supreme Court - State of Ohio

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?