disciplinary handbook: volume v - Supreme Court - State of Ohio

Gottehrer (3/17/2010)Gresley (12/22/2010)Jackson (11/30/2010)Kiesling (4/12/2010)Kizer (9/17/2009)Larson (12/30/2009)Lawson (7/9/2008)Miller (7/20/2010)Mishler (12/14/2010)Noel (6/17/2010)Ohlin (8/24/2010)Sanz (2/24/2011)Schiller (9/23/2009)Shuler (8/30/2011)Spector (3/18/2009)Stubbs (2/15/2011)Thomas (2/25/2010)Trainor (6/7/2011)Troxell (7/6/2011)Van Sickle (2/24/2011)Wilson (10/14/2010)Rule 1.16(a)(1) (accepting, or failing towithdraw from, representation that willviolate the Rules or other law)Mamich (3/25/2010)Rust (1/28/2010) (cause dismissed; noviolation of Rule 1.16(a)(a); Rule 3.1mentioned as support that nomisconduct)Rule 1.16(a)(2) (requiring withdraw whenlawyer’s wellness impairs lawyer’sability)Williams (9/7/2011)Rule 1.16(c) (withdrawing fromrepresentation in a proceeding withoutleave of court if required)Gibson (2/16/2011)Johnson (10/7/2010)Rule 1.16(d) (taking steps to protect aclient’s interest as part of termination ofrepresentation)Bursey (12/2/2009)Davis (11/29/2011)Gibson (2/16/2011)Gresley (12/22/2010)Henry (12/22/2010)Holda (4/7/2010)Johnson (10/7/2010)Kubyn (3/19/2009)Lape (11/10/2011)Lawson (7/9/2008)Maher (2/5/2009)Meade (12/22/2010)Schiller (9/23/2009)Index- 395Rule 1.16(e) (promptly refunding fee paidin advance that is not earned)Davis (11/29/2011)Gresley (12/22/2010)Henry (12/22/2010)Jackson (11/30/2010)Kubyn (3/19/2009)Lawson (7/9/2008)Schiller (9/23/2009)Squire (11/3/2011)Rule 3.1 (not bringing or defending aproceeding, or asserting or controvertingan issue in a proceeding, unless there is abasis in law and fact for doing so that isnot frivolous)Pullins (12/23/2010)Ricketts (12/23/2010) (not alleged as aviolation but used by respondent to arguegood faith defense to other ruleviolations)Rust (1/28/2010) (cause dismissed; noviolation of Rule 1.16(a)(a); Rule 3.1mentioned as support that nomisconduct)Rule 3.3(a)(1) (knowingly make or fail tocorrect a false statement of fact to atribunal)Cameron (10/12/2011)Mitchell (1/26/2010)Hoppel (6/8/2011)Rohrer (11/17/2009)Thomas (3/24/2010)Zapor (12/2/2010)Rule 3.4(a) (destroying or concealing adocument with evidentiary value)Robinson (8/25/2010)Stafford (4/5/2011)Rule 3.4(c) (knowingly disobey the rulesof a tribunal)Baker (5/28/2009)Johnson (10/7/2010)Nicks (2/25/2010)Rohrer (11/17/2009)Shaw (9/23/2010)Stafford (4/5/2011)Rule 3.5(a)(6) (undignified ordiscourteous conduct that is degrading toa tribunal)DiCato (11/17/2011)Pullins (12/23/2010)Sakmar (12/1/2010)