MISR: In-Flight Radiometric Calibration and Characterization Plan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

28. Green, Robert O., James E. Conel and Thomas G. Chrien. Airborne Visible-InfraredImaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS): Sensor System, Inflight Calibration and ReflectanceCalculation. International Symposium on Spectral Sensing Research, pp. 22, 199229. Green, Robert O., Steve Larson and Ian Novack. Calibration of AVIRIS digitized data. Proc.Third Annual Airborne Geoscience Workshop, JPL Publication 92-14, 1992.30. Green, R. O. et al.. In-flight Calibration of the Spectral and Radiometric Characteristics ofAVIRIS in 1991. Proc. Third Annual Airborne Geoscience Workshop, JPL Publication 92-14, 1992.31. Green, R. O. and G. Vane. Validation/calibration of the Airborne Visible/Infrared ImagingSpectrometer (AVIRIS) in-flight. In Conference on Aerospace Sensing, ImagingSpectroscopy of the Terrestrial Environment. SPIE Orlando, Florida, 16-20 April 1990.32. Chrien, T.G., R.O. Green, and M.L. Eastwood. Accuracy of the Spectral and RadiometricLaboratory Calibration of the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer, InProceedings of the Second Airborne Visible/INfrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS)Workshop. JPL Publication 90-54, 1-14, 199033. Chrien, T. G., R. O. Green, and M. L. Eastwood. Accuracy of the Spectral and RadiometricLaboratory Calibration of the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer. InConference on Aerospace Sensing, Imaging Spectroscopy of the Terrestrial Environment,SPIE Orlando, Florida, 16-20 April 1990.34. Green, R.O., J.E. Conel, V. Carrere, C.J. Bruegge, J.S. Margolis, M.Rast, and G. Hoover.Determination of the in-flight spectral and radiometric characteristics of the airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS). In Proceedings of the Second Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) Workshop, JPL Publication 90-54, 15-34, 1990.35. Green, R.O., J.E. Conel, V. Carrere, C.J. Bruegge, J.S. Margolis, M.Rast, and G. Hoover.Inflight validation and Calibration of the Spectral and Radiometric Characteristics of theairborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS). In Conference on AerospaceSensing, Imaging Spectroscopy of the Terrestrial Environment, SPIE Orlando, Florida, 16-20 April 1990.36. Green, R.O. Calibration of the Airborne Visible/Infrared imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS),Imaging Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and prospective applications. JRC, ISPRA, Italy, 23-27 October 1989.37. Green, R.O. and G. Vane. In-flight determination of AVIRIS spectral, radiometric, spatialand signal-to-noise characteristics using atmospheric and surface measurements from thevicinity of the rare-earth-bearing carbonatite at Mountain Pass, California. In Proceedings ofthe AVIRIS Performance Evaluation Workshop, Gregg Vane, editor, JPL Publication, 1988.10. References78
38. Vane, G., T.G. Chrien, J.H. Reimer, R.O. Green, and J.E. Conel. Comparison of laboratorycalibrations of the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) at thebeginning and end of the first flight season. In Conference on Recent Advances in Sensors,Radiometry and Data Processing for Remote Sensing, SPIE Orlando, Florida, 924,4-8 April1988.10.3.3 Histogram equalization39. M. P. Weitreb, R. Xie, J. H. Lienesch and D. S. Crosby. Destriping GOES Images byMatching Empirical Distribution Functions. Remote Sens. of the Environ., 29, 185 - 195,1989.40. M. P. Weitreb, R. Xie, J. H. Lienesch and D. S. Crosby. Removing Stripes in GOES Imagesby Matching Empirical Distribution Functions. NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS26, National Oceanic and Atmosphere Administration, Washington, D. C., May 1989.10.3.4 Coherent noise41. Kieffer, H.H., E.M. Eliason, and P.S. Chavez, Jr. Intraband radiometric performance of theLandsat-4 Thematic Mapper. In Landsat-4 Science Characterization Early Results, Vol. 3-Thematic Mapper (TM) Part 2 Early results Symposium, NASA Conf. Pub. 2355, 22-24February 1983.42. Rice, D.P. and W.A. Malila. Investigation of radiometric properties of Landsat 4 MSS. InLandsat-4 Science Characterization Early Results, Vol. 1-Multispectral Scanner (MSS)Early results Symposium, NASA Conf. Pub. 2355, 22-24 February 1983.10.3.5 Aliasing noise43. Park, S.K and R. Hazra. Aliasing as noise: A quantitative and qualitative assessment.Technical Symposiums on Visual Information Processing II and Infrared Imaging Systems:Design and Testing IV, SPIE, 1993.44. Park, S.K. Image gathering, interpolation and restoration: a fidelity analysis. TechnicalSymposium on Visual Information Processing, SPIE, 1992.45. Park, S.K and S.E. Reichenbach. Digital image gathering and minimum mean-square errorrestoration. Technical Symposium on Visual Communications and Image Processing, SPIE,Vol. 1360, 1990.10.3.6 Desert scenes46. Cosnefroy, H., X. Briottet, M. Leroy, P. Lecomte, R. Santer. In-field characterization ofSaharan sites reflectances for the calibration of optical satellite sensors. IGARSS’94,Pasadena, 8-12Aug94, IEEE Catalog Number 94CH3378-7, 1500-1502, 1994.In-flight Radiometric Calibration and Characterization Plan, JPL D-1331579
Page 6:
10.4.2 Radiative transfer. . . . .
Page 9 and 10:
1. INTRODUCTION1.1 PURPOSEThis docu
Page 11 and 12:
• MISR Algorithm Development Plan
Page 13 and 14:
2.1 MISR SCIENCE OBJECTIVES2. EXPER
Page 15 and 16:
In addition to these modes, the ins
Page 17 and 18:
Table 2.1. Level 1A productProductL
Page 19 and 20:
Table 2.4. Level 1B1 Ancillary Radi
Page 21 and 22:
3. CALIBRATION OVERVIEW3.1 REQUIREM
Page 23 and 24:
equally to filter pinholes or scatt
Page 25 and 26:
PREFLIGHTDATAIFRCCactivityOtheracti
Page 27 and 28: Multiple methodologies are utilized
Page 29 and 30: laboratory environment. This includ
Page 31 and 32: 4. PREFLIGHT CALIBRATION AND CHARAC
Page 33 and 34: determination was originally planne
Page 35 and 36: Cause: The filters are non uniform
Page 37 and 38: is the affected area is about 30 pi
Page 39 and 40: 5. IN-FLIGHT RADIOMETRIC CALIBRATIO
Page 41 and 42: esponse functions will be verified
Page 43 and 44: the array. Dark current is expected
Page 45 and 46: OBC design effort. The actual uncer
Page 47 and 48: 5.2.1 High-altitude sensor-based ca
Page 49 and 50: laboratory measurements. In order t
Page 51 and 52: 6. LEVEL 1B1 RADIOMETRIC PRODUCT AL
Page 53 and 54: flight. Generation of the updated p
Page 55 and 56: 7. CHARACTERIZATIONThe radiance unc
Page 57 and 58: 7.1.4 PolarizationMISR has been des
Page 59 and 60: It is believed that the evaluation
Page 61 and 62: 8. CALIBRATION INTEGRITYCalibration
Page 63 and 64: The baseline CAM is the most useful
Page 65 and 66: had all lamps on, and the satellite
Page 67 and 68: 9. MANAGEMENT9.1 PERSONNEL ROLES9.1
Page 69 and 70: EurOpto (preflight radiometriccal.)
Page 71 and 72: PRINCIPALINVESTIGATORDavid J. Diner
Page 73 and 74: • Identifying/specifying all of t
Page 75 and 76: 10. REFERENCES10.1 MISR EXPERIMENT(
Page 77: 10.3 IN-FLIGHT CALIBRATION METHODOL
Page 81 and 82: APPENDIX A. NOMENCLATUREThe followi
Page 83 and 84: A.4 CHARACTERIZATIONcalibration. Th
Page 85 and 86: G 0 , G 1 , and G 2 are the respons
Page 87 and 88: APPENDIX B. CALIBRATION MODE SEQUEN
Page 89 and 90: In Cal-Dark data are acquired over
Page 91 and 92: Config. Home Run is a commanding of
Page 93 and 94: Repeat for 200 line repeat times, t
show all

MISR: In-Flight Radiometric Calibration and Characterization Plan

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?