Audit - City and County of Denver
Audit - City and County of Denver
Audit - City and County of Denver
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FINDINGThe <strong>City</strong>’s Medical Marijuana Licensing Practices are Inefficient <strong>and</strong>IneffectiveThe Department <strong>of</strong> Excise <strong>and</strong> Licenses (Department) should develop <strong>and</strong> implement asound governance <strong>and</strong> regulatory framework for its medical marijuana (MM) licensingprocess to ensure that its controls are properly functioning <strong>and</strong> that the Department canprovide up-to-date information to key stakeholders. Currently, the MM licensing processposes significant risks to the <strong>City</strong> due to the absence <strong>of</strong> any control framework.Additionally, in light <strong>of</strong> the recent passage <strong>of</strong> Amendment 64, which legalizesrecreational use <strong>of</strong> marijuana in Colorado, a control framework for MM should beestablished <strong>and</strong> fully operational before new regulations <strong>and</strong> licenses are issued forrecreational marijuana use to avoid similar control weaknesses <strong>and</strong> related risks.The root cause <strong>of</strong> the ineffective governance is based on the intentional decisions madeby Department management faced with many competing priorities. When theDepartment came under new management in 2011, they made a deliberate policydecision to prioritize the overall needs <strong>of</strong> the Department. Many <strong>of</strong> the issues discussed inthis report are the result <strong>of</strong> these decisions. Despite the fact that the Department hasbeen aware <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> the problems with the medical marijuana program for at leastthree years, management has taken few or no steps to address them due to certainlimiting factors, departmental constraints, staffing issues <strong>and</strong> intentionally holding <strong>of</strong>f onaddressing known problems for specific department strategic reasons. This reluctance toaddress known problems is concerning because it suggests that the Department has notmade it a high priority to address ongoing problems, some <strong>of</strong> which were identified inprevious audit reports by the <strong>Audit</strong>or’s Office.Despite the weaknesses identified, the audit team is not stipulating that there have beenany instances <strong>of</strong> wrong doing or fraud in any processes mentioned in this report. Rather,we cannot provide reasonable assurance to the contrary due to the lack <strong>of</strong> controls,monitoring activities, <strong>and</strong> a basic internal control framework for the processes related tothe <strong>City</strong>’s MM licensing operations. We have identified weaknesses resulting from the lack<strong>of</strong> an internal control framework in the three distinct areas <strong>of</strong> the process: applicationprocess, licensing process, <strong>and</strong> renewal process.Medical Marijuana License ApplicationProcessDuring the MM business licensure applicationprocess, there are a number <strong>of</strong> stepsinvolved where applicants interface with<strong>City</strong> personnel who gather importantinformation <strong>and</strong> collect fees. Steps in the• Application Process• Licensing Process• Renewal ProcessP a g e 11Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Audit</strong>or