13.07.2015 Views

Audit - City and County of Denver

Audit - City and County of Denver

Audit - City and County of Denver

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FINDINGThe <strong>City</strong>’s Medical Marijuana Licensing Practices are Inefficient <strong>and</strong>IneffectiveThe Department <strong>of</strong> Excise <strong>and</strong> Licenses (Department) should develop <strong>and</strong> implement asound governance <strong>and</strong> regulatory framework for its medical marijuana (MM) licensingprocess to ensure that its controls are properly functioning <strong>and</strong> that the Department canprovide up-to-date information to key stakeholders. Currently, the MM licensing processposes significant risks to the <strong>City</strong> due to the absence <strong>of</strong> any control framework.Additionally, in light <strong>of</strong> the recent passage <strong>of</strong> Amendment 64, which legalizesrecreational use <strong>of</strong> marijuana in Colorado, a control framework for MM should beestablished <strong>and</strong> fully operational before new regulations <strong>and</strong> licenses are issued forrecreational marijuana use to avoid similar control weaknesses <strong>and</strong> related risks.The root cause <strong>of</strong> the ineffective governance is based on the intentional decisions madeby Department management faced with many competing priorities. When theDepartment came under new management in 2011, they made a deliberate policydecision to prioritize the overall needs <strong>of</strong> the Department. Many <strong>of</strong> the issues discussed inthis report are the result <strong>of</strong> these decisions. Despite the fact that the Department hasbeen aware <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> the problems with the medical marijuana program for at leastthree years, management has taken few or no steps to address them due to certainlimiting factors, departmental constraints, staffing issues <strong>and</strong> intentionally holding <strong>of</strong>f onaddressing known problems for specific department strategic reasons. This reluctance toaddress known problems is concerning because it suggests that the Department has notmade it a high priority to address ongoing problems, some <strong>of</strong> which were identified inprevious audit reports by the <strong>Audit</strong>or’s Office.Despite the weaknesses identified, the audit team is not stipulating that there have beenany instances <strong>of</strong> wrong doing or fraud in any processes mentioned in this report. Rather,we cannot provide reasonable assurance to the contrary due to the lack <strong>of</strong> controls,monitoring activities, <strong>and</strong> a basic internal control framework for the processes related tothe <strong>City</strong>’s MM licensing operations. We have identified weaknesses resulting from the lack<strong>of</strong> an internal control framework in the three distinct areas <strong>of</strong> the process: applicationprocess, licensing process, <strong>and</strong> renewal process.Medical Marijuana License ApplicationProcessDuring the MM business licensure applicationprocess, there are a number <strong>of</strong> stepsinvolved where applicants interface with<strong>City</strong> personnel who gather importantinformation <strong>and</strong> collect fees. Steps in the• Application Process• Licensing Process• Renewal ProcessP a g e 11Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Audit</strong>or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!