Lund University - Lunds universitet

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TUITION-BASED COMPETITITON IN A GLOBALPREMIUM SEGMENT (LLM DEGREES)1InstitutionGraduate Law Degree (LLM) Tuition (£, in 1,000s)1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0St. Gallen University2.1 2.5University of Toronto (1)3.19.6Bucerius Law School (2)Cambridge University (3)Melbourne UniversityKing’s College LondonUniversity College LondonLondon School of Econ.Oxford University (4)Harvard University (1)10.55.1 10.810.4 11.010.84.8 11.05.0 11.88.5 12.47.5 14.9 14.920.1Low Medium High(1) Included for comparison purposes.(2) Master of Laws and Business (MLB).(3) College fee set at the maximum £ 2,013. Select colleges charge less than the maximum fee.(4) Bachelor of Civil Laws (BCL). College fee set at the maximum £ 4,500. Select colleges charge less than £ 2,000 but charges are in a state of flux.Notes: Data as of April 2006. Tuition and fee rates for the 2006/07 academic year are expected to be somewhat higher.Sources: Universities, ICG.ICG © 2010 Lund University – 7 May 20108
THE DEMISE OF UNSW ASIA1InstitutionUndergraduate Tuition (SGD, in 1,000s)2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0UNSW AsiaNUS domesticNUS internationalNTU domesticNTU international23.2 28.46.117.56.7 19.36.16.7The decision to close UNSW Asia in June 2007 was chiefly based on thelack of student enrollment. That should not have come as a surprise:UNSW Asia entered the Singaporean education market with a tuition levelwhich bore no relation to its competitive tuition situation.Notes:Sources:A prime example of amateurish tuition competitiveness behaviorTuition for the 2006/07 (NUS/NTU) or the aborted 2007 (UNSW ASIA) school year. NUS and NTU tuition take the MOE grant into consideration.Universities, ICG.ICG © 2010 Lund University – 7 May 20109
Page 1: Lund UniversityPerspectives on Tuit
Page 4 and 5: INTRODUCTION• This presentation i
Page 6 and 7: A HOLISTIC DEMAND PERSPECTIVE ON TU
Page 10 and 11: LUND’S INITIALLY PROPOSED TUITION
Page 12 and 13: LUND’S REVISED TUITION FEE LEVELS
Page 14 and 15: PROPOSED HT FACULTY PROGRAMS AND PR
Page 16 and 17: PROPOSED K FACULTY PROGRAMS AND PRI
Page 18 and 19: PROPOSED S FACULTY PROGRAMS AND PRI
Page 20 and 21: PROPOSED M FACULTY PROGRAMS AND PRI
Page 22 and 23: PROPOSED FREESTANDING PROGRAMS AND
Page 24 and 25: COMMENTARY: LUND’S REVISED TUITIO
Page 26 and 27: FURTHER DISCUSSION POINTS• Schola
Page 28 and 29: RECRUITMENT BRAND: CONCEPT• A uni
Page 30 and 31: ACADEMIC BRAND MATRIX - MEASURING A
Page 32 and 33: ABOUT THE ACADEMIC BRAND MATRIX II
Page 34 and 35: ACADEMIC BRAND MATRIX: ACADEMIC PER
Page 36 and 37: BEST PRACTICE ACADEMIC RE-BRANDING
Page 42 and 43: THE RELEVANCE OF INSTITUTIONAL WEBS
Page 44 and 45: LUND PRESENCE ON YOUTUBETop 5 Video
Page 46 and 47: AGENDAIntroductionFees and CostingB
Page 48 and 49: LundROLLING APPLICATIONS CONTINUED
Page 50 and 51: LSE CASE STUDY: BEST PRACTICE MARKE
Page 52 and 53: COMMENTS ON INSTITUTIONAL ONLINE AP
Page 54 and 55: AGENDAIntroductionFees and CostingB
Page 56 and 57: LUND UNIVERSITY WEBSITETop 5 Facebo
Page 58 and 59:
LUND UNIVERSITY WEBSITE - MASTER’
Page 60 and 61:
REGIONAL STRATEGIES (I)• A 2006 r
Page 62 and 63:
REGIONAL STRATEGIES (III)ICG Strate
Page 64:
CONTACT INFORMATIONDr. Daniel J Guh
show all

Lund University - Lunds universitet

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?