A Short Paper Proposing that weNeed to Write Shorter PapersStephen Krashen“When we ask the time, we don’t want to know how watches are constructed.”Georg Christoph Lichtenberg (1742-1799)IntroductionOur current journals in language education arefull of long papers. A typical journal might have,at most, five major papers. Sometimes we haveto write long papers, but most of the time, it isunnecessary: the papers often contain longintroductions more suitable for doctoraldissertations or review “state of the art” papersapparently designed to provide evidence that theauthor is well-read. They also have longconclusions, with a repetition of the findings <strong>and</strong>the author’s detailed <strong>and</strong> lengthy speculationsabout what the results might mean for theory<strong>and</strong> application.Readers of professional journals do not needthis. Introductions should only give enoughinformation to alert the reader as to what thearticle is about, <strong>and</strong> provide a few citations incase the reader needs more information. If thearticles cited in the introduction are readilyavailable, readers are free to consult them, <strong>and</strong>a brief indication of implications is generallymore than enough for experienced readers.Also, if the results section is clear, no repetitionof the findings is necessary in the conclusion.Watson <strong>and</strong> Crick’s (1953) Nobel Prize winningpaper on the double helix was only one page.Their conclusion: “It has not escaped our noticethat the specific pairing we have postulatedimmediately suggests a possible copyingmechanism for the genetic material” (p. 737).Long papers drain intellectual energy from bothreaders <strong>and</strong> writers, <strong>and</strong> waste their time.Long papers take longer to write, <strong>and</strong> much ofthe energy in writing them is dedicated tosections that don’t engage the writer: Writing isa powerful tool to solve problems, <strong>and</strong> can resultin substantial cognitive development (it can makeyou smarter), but to do this, the writing must bedirected at a difficult problem (Langer <strong>and</strong>Applebee, 1987).Long papers also take longer to read. Evenreaders who try to skim long papers have todevote time <strong>and</strong> energy to find the essentialparts, <strong>and</strong> run the danger of missing the details.A Disservice to the Profession <strong>and</strong> to theScholarToo-long papers hurt the spread of knowledgein two ways: They waste our time in bothreading <strong>and</strong> writing, <strong>and</strong> they promote sloppyreading. Many readers are content just to readthe abstract <strong>and</strong> perhaps the summary oftechnical papers, with just a glance at a table.This means that significant details onmethodology, crucial points <strong>and</strong> analyses buriedin the paper, are missed, <strong>and</strong> often errors areperpetuated.Too-long papers also take up space. A journalwith five long papers could easily include 20short papers. This space limitation hurts thedissemination of knowledge, because not onlyis the information less genuine, but it muchharder for junior scholars to publish <strong>and</strong> to gettenure <strong>and</strong> promotion, especially whenuniversities require publication in certainjournals. This problem will be alleviated as morejournals become available electronically.<strong>Language</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Teaching</strong> Volume 1 Number 2 July 2012 38
ConclusionAgain, sometimes papers have to be long. Butoften they don’t, <strong>and</strong> the problem usually lieswith the long introductions <strong>and</strong> conclusions thatgo far beyond the needs of the paper.<strong>Language</strong> education has clearly taken itstradition from the humanities, which favorsdissertation-style prose, rather than the sciences,where papers are usually much shorter.It is probably no coincidence that citation ratesin science are much higher: Hamilton (1991)reported that about 91% of papers published inatomic, molecular <strong>and</strong> chemical physics, <strong>and</strong>86% in virology, had been cited at least once. Inlanguage <strong>and</strong> linguistics, only 20% had been cited<strong>and</strong> in American literature, less than 1%.ReferencesWatson, J. & Crick, F. (1953). A structure fordeoxyribose nucleic acid, Nature 171, 737-738.Hamilton, D. (1991). Research papers: Who’s unitednow? Science 251: 25.Langer, J. & Applebee, A. (1987). How writing shapesthinking. Urbana, IL: National Council ofTeachers of English.Stephen D. Krashen is Professor Emeritus at theUniversity of Southern California; he moved fromthe linguistics department to the School of Educationin 1994. He is a linguist, educational researcher, <strong>and</strong>activist. He has been perhaps the most influentialvoice in second language acquisition in recent times.We publish this paper to show to our readers howso much can be achieved through well-written shortpapers.skrashen@yahoo.com<strong>Language</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Teaching</strong> Volume 1 Number 2 July 2012 39