Language and Language Teaching, Issue 2 - Azim Premji Foundation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

even academic authorities lack an understandingof CCE. In these circumstances, the work of ateacher is limited to that of mechanicallymaintaining different kinds of records andregisters, instead of thinking about teachinglearningand assessment in a comprehensivefashion. Further, the limited infrastructure, thehigh pupil teacher ratios in many schools andthe burden of covering the syllabus and compilingthese registers, constrain them from reflectingon CCE and realizing their pedagogicimaginations. As a result, there is a huge gapbetween how CCE (or for that matter anychange) has been conceptualised and how it isbeing implemented.These discussions were taken forward in thesecond session by identifying some of the broadconcerns CCE seeks to address – thepsychological burden, the increasing competitiveand commercialised ethos in education, the lackof freedom and equity, and the contradictionsof ‘objective’ assessments. The assessmentsystems followed at the University levels and inother countries were also discussed, particularlyto highlight the overall educational experienceof a learner and its emotional and intellectualimpression on her personality. From the firstday’s sessions it emerged that although teachersappreciate the vision of CCE, the conditions inwhich they work do not allow them to be ableto ‘implement’ or practice it properly.The second day’s session began with a reflectionon some real life assessment situations to gaugehow they matched the concept of CCE. It wasstressed that the manner in which CCE is beingimplemented in schools at present, compromisesthe whole CCE approach. The changes thatCCE envisions were discussed through thespecific instance of the switch from report cardsto children’s cumulative records/portfolios.The following session pursued the idea of ‘shift’in some more detail. The participants reflectedon the ‘shifts’ they have experienced inteaching-learning at school over the past decadeor so. These discussions brought-out that inessence CCE is not a ‘new’ way of assessment– many teachers have been practicingassessment in the way CCE expects them to.However, the difference is that the teachers cannow formally use such assessment.Further in the session, through the sharing ofteachers’ everyday experiences, the groupengaged in debates which are central to the ethosof assessment practices, or rather the wholepedagogic environment in schools, but are oftenconsidered to be peripheral in discussions onCCE. These related to democracy, equity andagency of a child. As a particular instance, theparticipants deliberated extensively, on thepractice of corporal-punishment in schools. Thisdiscussion brought out the complicated relationalethos in schools, and how it is difficult to discussand situate CCE ignoring this ethos. It was alsofelt that without understanding child as a partnerin learning and creating democratic teachinglearningspaces, the vision that a humaneassessment approach entails could not berealised.The session following these discussions,focussed on the various ways of understandinga child’s learning and some possible tools thatcould facilitate these processes. These toolsincluded observations and teacher-madeschedules for observation, dialoguing with andlistening to children, anecdotal records, peerappraisal, the teacher’s diary, writtenassessment and the child’s portfolio. Theparticular feature of these tools was that thesewere developed by researchers and teachers inactual classroom situations. The focus was notto present ‘model’ tools for replication, but toshare some real-life exemplars used forunderstanding and supporting learning. Thecontextual design, purpose and nature of thesetools were specific reference points in thesepresentations.Language and Language Teaching Volume 1 Number 2 July 2012 62
The workshop, in general, created a space whereteachers along with some other stakeholders inschool education could collect their experiencesof evaluation and assessment practices andreflect on them as a community. It also engagedwith the basic philosophy of CCE and ways ofapproaching the goals of CCE. The workshopconcluded with the expectation that thesediscussions would be explored further. It wasproposed that the work on CCE would continuewith more specific focus on the ways ofassessing learning and practicing CCE. The hopewas expressed that Ahvaan and AUD willcontinue to deliberate on aspects of the qualityof education and engage with a largercommunity of teachers to take these issuesforward.*The Ahvaan Group consists of governmentschool teachers, academics and researcherswhich has been working over the past oneyear to understand and improve the qualityof education in the government schoolsystem.Call for PapersLanguage and Language TeachingLanguage and Language Teaching (LLT) isa peer-reviewed periodical. It is not an ELTperiodical. It focuses on the theory and practiceof language-teaching and English is only one ofthe languages one might consider. Since thereare already many journals devoted to ELT, weparticularly welcome articles dealing with otherlanguages.Papers are invited for the forthcoming issues.Please follow the Guidelines given in the currentissue. The references must be complete in ALLrespects, and must follow the APA style sheet.Papers may address any aspect of language orlanguage-teaching. They MUST be written in astyle that is easily accessible to school teachers,who are the primary target audience of thisperiodical. The articles may focus on the learner,teacher, materials, teacher training, learningenvironment, evaluation, or policy issues.Activities focusing on different languages arealso invited. The article must be original andshould not have been submitted for publicationanywhere else. A statement to this effect mustbe sent along with the article.No paper should exceed 2000 wordsincluding references and the bio-note of thecontributor. The bio-note should not exceed25 words.Last date for the submission of articles:January Issue: October 30July Issue: April 30Articles may be submitted online simultaneouslyto the following email IDs:agniirk@yahoo.comamrit.l.khanna@gmail.comjourllt@gmail.comThey may also be posted to:Vidya Bhawan SocietyFatehpura, Udaipur 313004Rajasthan, IndiaLanguage and Language Teaching Volume 1 Number 2 July 2012 63
Page 3 and 4:
Language and Language TeachingVolum
Page 5 and 6:
marking. The judgment is not a ‘l
Page 7 and 8:
All classroom experiences are insta
Page 9 and 10:
for us. In this article I focus on
Page 11 and 12: However, we were not successful in
Page 13 and 14: observations are very similar to th
Page 15 and 16: ensure that they get a solid founda
Page 17 and 18: of Marathi. The remarkable thing wa
Page 19 and 20: Popularizing any language is a two-
Page 21 and 22: Cartoon Shows: A Tool to Facilitate
Page 23 and 24: Comprehension is a two-fold process
Page 25 and 26: 4) What did they do to solve the pr
Page 27 and 28: Then we sat down, and I told them t
Page 29 and 30: Democratizing the Classroom: August
Page 31 and 32: I) Ask for different ways of handli
Page 33 and 34: change. They are ready to flout eth
Page 35 and 36: observer. In the context of the pre
Page 37 and 38: poverty and lack of alternative sou
Page 39 and 40: ConclusionAgain, sometimes papers h
Page 41 and 42: (SLAP), which materialized a shift
Page 43 and 44: LandmarksTheory and Practice ofLang
Page 45 and 46: What are excluded are asadhu forms
Page 47 and 48: Notes:1We have the world’s first
Page 49 and 50: Mesthrie does not sound convinced w
Page 51 and 52: in using English for teaching diffe
Page 53 and 54: use of lesson plans, etc.), and pra
Page 55 and 56: Practice in a Second Language: Pers
Page 57 and 58: students that these words occur in
Page 59 and 60: themselves increase their interest,
Page 61: ReportWorkshop on Continuous and Co
Page 65 and 66: 20th KOTESOL InternationalConferenc
Page 67 and 68: 5) I liked the article written by S
Page 69: Language and Language Teaching Volu
show all

Language and Language Teaching, Issue 2 - Azim Premji Foundation

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?