V - Esigelec

Comparison between FEM and radiated modelElectricfieldmagneticfieldz(m)z(m)z(m)z(m)Modeled |Ex| (dBV/m)0.03500.02400.013002010-0.01-0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03x(m)HFSS |Ex| (dBV/m) (3mm)0.030.020.010-0.01-0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03x(m)Modeled |Hx| (dBA/m)50403020100.0300.02-200.01-400-60-0.01-0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03-80x(m)HFSS |Hx| (dBA/m) (3mm)0.030.020.010-0.01-0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03x(m)0-20-40-60-80z(m)z(m)z(m)z(m)Modeled |Ey| (dBV/m)0.030.020.0100-0.01-0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03x(m)HFSS |Ey| (dBV/m) (3mm)0.030.020.010-0.01-0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03x(m)Modeled |Hy| (dBA/m)0.030.02402040200.01-200-0.01-0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03-40x(m)HFSS |Hy| (dBA/m) (3mm)0.030.020.010-0.01-0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03x(m)000-20-40z(m)z(m)Modeled |Ez| (dBV/m)0.030.020.010-0.01-0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03x(m)HFSS |Ez| (dBV/m)0.030.020.010-0.01-0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03x(m)z(m)z(m)Modeled |Hz| (dBA/m)0.030.0260402006040200.01-200-0.01-40-0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03x(m)HFSS |Hz| (dBA/m) (3mm)-0.01-0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03x(m)Comparison of electric NF maps radiated by the DUT and its equivalent model0.030.020.010000-20-40E.R.Rajkumar et al, PIER B 37, pp. 143-169, 2012.53