Justice Sector and the Rule of Law - AfriMAP
Justice Sector and the Rule of Law - AfriMAP
Justice Sector and the Rule of Law - AfriMAP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
public servant, provides that a public servant who fails to account for money or property that heor she had in his or her custody by virtue <strong>of</strong> his or her employment, ‘shall, unless he [or she] satisfies<strong>the</strong> court to <strong>the</strong> contrary, be presumed to have stolen such money or o<strong>the</strong>r property, <strong>and</strong> shallbe convicted <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> felony <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ft.’ The High Court has stated that this provision is inconsistentwith <strong>the</strong> presumption <strong>of</strong> innocence. 43 O<strong>the</strong>r examples <strong>of</strong> laws in this category are sections 313<strong>and</strong> 314 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Criminal Procedure <strong>and</strong> Evidence Code, 44 which impose on <strong>the</strong> accused person ina criminal trial <strong>the</strong> obligation to enter his or her defence at <strong>the</strong> close <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> case for <strong>the</strong> prosecution<strong>and</strong> to give evidence (for court challenges to <strong>the</strong>se provisions, see fur<strong>the</strong>r below, p.10).Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Malawian laws that are inconsistent with international human rights law <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> country’s Constitution are a legacy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colonial era. They were adopted <strong>and</strong>, in some cases,modified by <strong>the</strong> post-colonial government <strong>and</strong> survived <strong>the</strong> political transformation <strong>of</strong> 1994,which included <strong>the</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> a Constitution with human rights guarantees. The Constitutiondeclares that laws that are inconsistent with it are invalid; never<strong>the</strong>less, successive governmentssince 1994 have applied laws that courts have found to be inconsistent with human rights protection.The government has also permitted <strong>the</strong> continued application <strong>of</strong> customary laws that arearguably inconsistent with human rights st<strong>and</strong>ards.In addition to legislation, some customary laws are discriminatory, such as those that prohibitwomen from marrying polygamously but do not impose a similar prohibition on men.These laws are applied on a daily basis among <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population. 45 The positionregarding polygamy may, however, change if <strong>the</strong> government adopts <strong>and</strong> Parliament enacts aproposal by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Commission to outlaw all polygamous marriages. 46Any law can be challenged on <strong>the</strong> grounds that it violates <strong>the</strong> Constitution. Section 5 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Constitution declares that any act <strong>of</strong> government or any law that is inconsistent with <strong>the</strong> provisions<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Constitution shall, to <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> such inconsistency, be invalid. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, section199 provides that <strong>the</strong> Constitution shall have <strong>the</strong> status as supreme law <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong>reshall be no legal or political authority save as is provided by or under this Constitution. Finally,