03.12.2012 Views

ordinance amending chapter 23 of the municipal - City of Appleton

ordinance amending chapter 23 of the municipal - City of Appleton

ordinance amending chapter 23 of the municipal - City of Appleton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MUNCIPAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES<br />

June 7, 2011<br />

PAGE 5<br />

Fails for lack <strong>of</strong> second.<br />

Director Harkness stated all crossing closures are difficult and have ramifications. There<br />

were a lot <strong>of</strong> meetings and discussions to come up with <strong>the</strong> three that staff is recommending.<br />

Alderperson Hill will support Superior Street closing but not Locust Street because <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />

lot <strong>of</strong> negative neighborhood feedback regarding that closure.<br />

Alderperson Croatt asked if this passes, do <strong>the</strong>se two still close even if package not<br />

approved?<br />

Alderperson Clemons responded yes.<br />

Motion to approve Superior Street closure by Hill, second by Clemons.<br />

Vote on motion. (2/1-Konetzke)<br />

Locust Street Crossing Discussion<br />

Kathy Hartman, 1036 W. Eighth Street, <strong>Appleton</strong> – discussed <strong>the</strong> rules to petition railroad for<br />

closures and read from 195.29 State Statute. She stated some people don’t care about <strong>the</strong><br />

trestles. She stated we are going to lose streets and <strong>the</strong>re will a cost for developing <strong>the</strong><br />

trestles into trails.<br />

Tammy Eastman, 745 W. Lawrence St., <strong>Appleton</strong> – lives on <strong>the</strong> corner <strong>of</strong> Lawrence Street<br />

and Locust Street. She is concerned about cutting <strong>of</strong>f access to businesses.<br />

Alderperson Smith stated Alderperson Spears could not be here but had emailed him with<br />

several questions. Her questions are-is <strong>the</strong>re any o<strong>the</strong>r way to obtain <strong>the</strong> trestles? Does <strong>the</strong><br />

Fox River Navigational Authority have any jurisdiction on what is over <strong>the</strong> river? Does <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>City</strong> have any rights to <strong>the</strong> trestles if <strong>the</strong>y are considered abandoned property? Can we use<br />

eminent domain to acquire <strong>the</strong>m? Do we know how <strong>the</strong> Town <strong>of</strong> Menasha and <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Menasha acquired <strong>the</strong>ir train trestles?<br />

Director Harkness stated <strong>the</strong> trestle was donated in Menasha and The Fox River Navigational<br />

Authority has no jurisdiction. She also stated we would not use eminent domain to acquire<br />

<strong>the</strong> trestles.<br />

Motion to hold Locust Street crossing in order to hold a Informal Public Hearing at <strong>the</strong> July<br />

11 th <strong>City</strong> Plan Commission and a Public Hearing at <strong>the</strong> July 20 th Common Council meeting<br />

by Hill, second by Clemons.<br />

Vote on motion. (2/1-Konetzke)<br />

____________________________________<br />

Alderperson Clemons<br />

Chairperson<br />

INFORMATIONAL<br />

1. The minutes from <strong>the</strong> May 24, 2011 meeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Municipal Services Committee were<br />

approved.<br />

2. Director’s Report.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!