- Page 1 and 2: Polish Academy of SciencesInstitute
- Page 3 and 4: AcknowledgementsI would like to tha
- Page 5 and 6: Curriculum VitaeEducation and Train
- Page 7: Jaszowiec, Poland, 2005, RKKY and Z
- Page 11: 10.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . .
- Page 14 and 15: to look far to find another example
- Page 16 and 17: 1990 was a watershed event in the f
- Page 18 and 19: Figure 1.1: Examples of spintronic
- Page 20 and 21: values of spin-splitting up to thos
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter 3(Ga,Mn)As as a dilutemagne
- Page 25 and 26: in the 1970s and became commonly us
- Page 27 and 28: GaAsMna 2a 3a 1dFigure 3.1: (Ga,Mn)
- Page 29 and 30: 3.3 Mn impuritiesThe (Ga,Mn)As crys
- Page 31 and 32: values too large to be explained by
- Page 33 and 34: Chapter 4Origin of magnetism in(Ga,
- Page 35 and 36: They lead to dramatic spin-dependen
- Page 37 and 38: alignment of the Mn moments. The el
- Page 39 and 40: Although J(r) describes exchange in
- Page 41 and 42: Taking into account the above equat
- Page 43 and 44: Bohr radius a ⋆ . One can expect
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 5Band structure of(Ga,Mn)As
- Page 47 and 48: I know how to decompose the potenti
- Page 49 and 50: k zk xΓΛLΣ K∆QWUZSXk yFigure 5
- Page 51 and 52: or antibonding. In semiconductors l
- Page 53 and 54: of the Brillouin zone are illustrat
- Page 55 and 56: 5.4.2 Structure inversion asymmetry
- Page 57 and 58: of electrons on the ion’s electro
- Page 59 and 60:
Chapter 6Band structure methodsIn t
- Page 61 and 62:
the higher-lying ones can be taken
- Page 63 and 64:
Parameter Kohn-Luttinger Kane (set
- Page 65 and 66:
and Q ǫ and R ǫ are the following
- Page 67 and 68:
ThematrixM kso describesthek-depend
- Page 69 and 70:
a b c022−0.2−0.41.51.5−2 −1
- Page 71 and 72:
It is easy to see that the basis st
- Page 73 and 74:
dependence on the interatomic dista
- Page 75 and 76:
35 spds*sps*302520151050−5−10L
- Page 77:
40-orbital spds ⋆ tight-binding a
- Page 80 and 81:
adjacentmagneticmomentsandtheirexci
- Page 82 and 83:
consistent and can accommodate any
- Page 84 and 85:
which gives for M ′ ≤ N( ) NΩ
- Page 86 and 87:
One can associate each lattice spin
- Page 88 and 89:
volume. For P carriers, the Fermi e
- Page 90 and 91:
FMFigure 7.3: Free energy F of the
- Page 92 and 93:
MT1 2 3 4TFigure 7.6: Average magne
- Page 94 and 95:
the ions’ magnetisation changes.
- Page 96 and 97:
Because of the spin-orbit coupling
- Page 98 and 99:
my perturbation calculus invalid. H
- Page 100 and 101:
Due to the equality ∆ = NSβ/V, t
- Page 102 and 103:
102
- Page 104 and 105:
of the lattice ions. It ignores the
- Page 106 and 107:
52with angular momentum L = 0 do no
- Page 108 and 109:
in the vicinity of the Γ point, in
- Page 110 and 111:
shinskii-Moriyaexchange. Someofthem
- Page 112 and 113:
emaining terms).I want to obtain th
- Page 114 and 115:
where excitation modes are spin wav
- Page 116 and 117:
SPIN−WAVE DISPERSION ω q(meV)654
- Page 118 and 119:
the coefficients of the q-dependent
- Page 120 and 121:
where p αβ = A µναβ q µq ν
- Page 122 and 123:
stiffness tensors in a similar mann
- Page 124 and 125:
Figure9.7: Cycloidalspinstructurein
- Page 126 and 127:
yφxK surf0 , l = 0 l = 1 ... l = L
- Page 128 and 129:
two pictures is especially apparent
- Page 130 and 131:
due to the multiplicity of the vale
- Page 132 and 133:
hh COMPOSITIONso COMPOSITION0.80.60
- Page 134 and 135:
mean-field Brillouin function (8.1)
- Page 136 and 137:
ters for numerical simulations, I s
- Page 138 and 139:
EXCHANGE STIFFNESS (pJ/m)0.40.30.20
- Page 140 and 141:
the employed Landau-Lifshitz equati
- Page 142 and 143:
netisation. The basic theoretical m
- Page 144 and 145:
M z [242] and has a weak anisotropy
- Page 146 and 147:
the periodic parts of the modified
- Page 148 and 149:
model used must also have enough ro
- Page 150 and 151:
The multiband tight-binding methods
- Page 152 and 153:
AH CONDUCTIVITY σ xy(S/cm)10080604
- Page 154 and 155:
AH CONDUCTIVITY σ xy(S/cm)14012010
- Page 156 and 157:
the negative AHE conductivity is ob
- Page 158 and 159:
Figure 10.10: Hall conductivity vs.
- Page 160 and 161:
160
- Page 162 and 163:
crystals, which provide full contro
- Page 164 and 165:
form of statistical DMFT (statDMFT)
- Page 166 and 167:
FigureA.1: Relationsbetweensoftware
- Page 168 and 169:
168
- Page 170 and 171:
a str strained lattice constanta
- Page 172 and 173:
U Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya vectorV cry
- Page 174 and 175:
gdzieL ′ = F ′ +2G M = H 1 +H 2
- Page 176 and 177:
której wartość pola średniego
- Page 178 and 179:
[12] G. Binasch, P. Grünberg, F. S
- Page 180 and 181:
[42] M. A. Ruderman and C. Kittel.
- Page 182 and 183:
[69] H. Munekata, A. Zaslavsky, P.
- Page 184 and 185:
[92] J. Zemen, J. Kučera, K. Olejn
- Page 186 and 187:
[118] C. Zener. Interaction between
- Page 188 and 189:
[143] J. Jancu, R. Scholz, F. Beltr
- Page 190 and 191:
[171] T. E. Ostromek. Evaluation of
- Page 192 and 193:
[199] C. Gourdon, A. Dourlat, V. Je
- Page 194 and 195:
[221] H. B. Callen. Green function
- Page 196 and 197:
[249] G. Sundaram and Q. Niu. Wave-
- Page 198 and 199:
[275] K. Y. Wang, K. W. Edmonds, R.
- Page 200 and 201:
[300] D. J. Garcia, K. Hallberg, an