13.07.2015 Views

2010 BC Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive

2010 BC Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive

2010 BC Guide in Determining Fitness to Drive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

M<strong>in</strong>istry of Public Safety and Solici<strong>to</strong>r GeneralOffice of the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles<strong>2010</strong> <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> <strong>in</strong> Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>Fitness</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Drive</strong>Date Issued: July 12, <strong>2010</strong>


ForewordWe are pleased <strong>to</strong> present the <strong>2010</strong> <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> <strong>in</strong> Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>Fitness</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Drive</strong>.The <strong>Guide</strong> replaces the 1997 <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> for Physicians <strong>in</strong> Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>Fitness</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Drive</strong> a Mo<strong>to</strong>rVehicle, 7th edition. A companion piece <strong>to</strong> the <strong>Guide</strong> – The <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Handbook forMedical Professionals -- a handbook for the use of doc<strong>to</strong>rs who may have <strong>to</strong> consider a patient’sfitness <strong>to</strong> drive, will be published <strong>in</strong> the spr<strong>in</strong>g of 2011.While the <strong>Guide</strong> represents a departure <strong>in</strong> how driver fitness policy is articulated <strong>in</strong> <strong>BC</strong>, it cont<strong>in</strong>uesthe 46 years of collaboration between the <strong>BC</strong> Medical Association (<strong>BC</strong>MA) and the Office of theSuper<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles (OSMV).The policies and procedures <strong>in</strong> this <strong>Guide</strong> are the result of a lengthy and <strong>in</strong>tensive process. In March2006, OSMV, <strong>in</strong> partnership with the <strong>BC</strong>MA, launched the <strong>Guide</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Drive</strong> Project. Over the courseof four years, the <strong>BC</strong>MA played an <strong>in</strong>tegral role <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es and adecision mak<strong>in</strong>g framework for OSMV.The <strong>Guide</strong> represents the <strong>BC</strong>MA and OSMV‟s cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g commitment <strong>to</strong> anchor driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ations on the best-evidence available. In response <strong>to</strong> case law, the <strong>Guide</strong> presents anapproach <strong>to</strong> driver fitness focused on functional ability <strong>to</strong> driver rather than diagnosis.Implementation of the <strong>2010</strong> <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> <strong>in</strong> Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>Fitness</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Drive</strong> reflects a cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>gcommitment <strong>to</strong> public safety while allow<strong>in</strong>g the maximum driv<strong>in</strong>g privilege possible.i


AcknowledgmentsResearcherBonnie M. Dobbs, PhDDirec<strong>to</strong>r of ResearchDivision of the Care of the ElderlyDepartment of Family Medic<strong>in</strong>eUniversity of AlbertaDirec<strong>to</strong>r, Medically At-Risk <strong>Drive</strong>r Centre, Alberta<strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Reform Initiative Project TeamThomas Broeren, Legal policy consultant, Gordium Associates (Canada) Inc.Shannon Craig, Operational policy consultant, Gordium Associates (Canada) Inc.Carole Gamble, OSMV Adjudica<strong>to</strong>rBlair Grant, Manager, <strong>Drive</strong>r Licens<strong>in</strong>g Standards, IC<strong>BC</strong>Marie McCloskey, OSMV Case ManagerDr. John McCracken, OSMV Medical ConsultantKev<strong>in</strong> Murray, OSMV Case ManagerMargot Tubman, Project Manager, Gordium Associates (Canada) Inc.<strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Reform Initiative Steer<strong>in</strong>g CommitteeDr. Ian Gillespie, <strong>BC</strong> Medical AssociationLisa Howie, Deputy Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles,Nancy Letkeman, Direc<strong>to</strong>r Policy and Research BranchLisa Laupland, IC<strong>BC</strong>, Manager Licens<strong>in</strong>g Support ServicesSteve Mart<strong>in</strong>, Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r VehiclesStephanie Melv<strong>in</strong>, Direc<strong>to</strong>r, OSMV Hear<strong>in</strong>gs and Fair Practices<strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Reform Initiative Advisory CommitteeJennifer Kroeker-Hall, Manager, <strong>Drive</strong>r Licens<strong>in</strong>g PolicyDr. Ian Gillespie, <strong>BC</strong> Medical AssociationDavid Dunne, Direc<strong>to</strong>r, Road Safety, <strong>BC</strong>AA Traffic Safety Foundationii


Version His<strong>to</strong>ryDocument Information and Revision His<strong>to</strong>ryProjectTitle<strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Reform Initiative<strong>BC</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> In Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>Fitness</strong> To <strong>Drive</strong>Version Version 1.5StatusF<strong>in</strong>alHISTORYDate Changes made by: Description of ChangeDraft 1 June 2007Draft 2 November 21 2007Draft 3 June 18 2008Draft 4 June 21 2008Draft 5 August 4 2008Draft 6 September 23 2008Draft 7 Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 31, 2008Draft 8 December 9, 2008Draft 9 April 30, 2009F<strong>in</strong>al July12, <strong>2010</strong>Revisionv1.4.1Revisionv1.5Revisionv1.6March 14, 2013 Kev<strong>in</strong> Murray One word revision <strong>to</strong> change error <strong>in</strong>17.42 <strong>to</strong> correctly read “Commercial”<strong>in</strong>stead “Private”May 1, 2013 Kev<strong>in</strong> Murray •17.27 -- new text outl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g CCSconsensus on pacemaker <strong>in</strong>sertion•17.28 -- new text outl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g CCSconsensus on pacemaker <strong>in</strong>sertion•17.45 and 17.45.1 -- new text outl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>grevised CCS consensus on LVAD•Chapter 29 – drug names andclassifications revised follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>putfrom CCMTA SMEs•Pages 46, 47, 56, 353 & 354:SIMARD cut-po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong>serted <strong>to</strong> reflectthe recommendations of theresearcher who designed the <strong>to</strong>olFebruary 2014 Kev<strong>in</strong> Murray Update <strong>in</strong>formation on cognitivescreen<strong>in</strong>g assessments <strong>in</strong> recognitionthat there are many assessment <strong>to</strong>ols<strong>in</strong> use by health care professionalsiii


Table of Contents (click on any item <strong>to</strong> jump <strong>to</strong> that page)Foreward ………………………………………………………………………………………….iAcknowledgments ...............................................................................................................................iiVersion His<strong>to</strong>ry ................................................................................................................................. iiiTable of Contents ............................................................................................................................... ivPART 1: BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 1Chapter 1: Introduction .............................................................................................................. 21.1 How this Manual is organized........................................................................................ 21.2 Purpose of this Manual ................................................................................................... 31.3 A chang<strong>in</strong>g approach <strong>to</strong> driver fitness.......................................................................... 3Chapter 2: The <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program .................................................................................. 52.1 The legal and policy authority for the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program ............................... 52.2 <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program overview ................................................................................. 72.3 Roles and responsibilities .............................................................................................. 11Chapter 3: <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples...................................................................... 153.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 153.2 Risk management ........................................................................................................... 163.3 Functional approach ...................................................................................................... 173.4 Individual assessment .................................................................................................... 233.5 Best <strong>in</strong>formation ............................................................................................................. 25PART 2: POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ................................................................................ 26Chapter 4: Introduction <strong>to</strong> the Policies and Procedures ...................................................... 274.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 27Chapter 5: Screen<strong>in</strong>g Policies ................................................................................................... 305.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 305.2 Screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividuals with known or possible medical conditions ........................ 315.3 Screen<strong>in</strong>g ag<strong>in</strong>g drivers ................................................................................................. 335.4 Screen<strong>in</strong>g commercial drivers...................................................................................... 335.5 Transient impairments .................................................................................................. 355.6 Cancell<strong>in</strong>g or restrict<strong>in</strong>g a licence because of an immediate public safety risk ... 35Chapter 6: Assessment Policies and Procedures ................................................................... 376.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 376.2 Assessments will only be requested if necessary <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e fitness ................... 396.3 Request<strong>in</strong>g medical assessments .................................................................................. 396.4 Request<strong>in</strong>g specialist assessments................................................................................ 416.5 Request<strong>in</strong>g functional assessments .............................................................................. 426.6 Request<strong>in</strong>g assessments of cognitive function ........................................................... 466.7 Request<strong>in</strong>g assessments of mo<strong>to</strong>r function................................................................. 476.8 Time period dur<strong>in</strong>g which assessments are valid ..................................................... 486.9 Time limits for drivers <strong>to</strong> complete assessments ....................................................... 486.10 Assessment procedures.................................................................................................. 50Chapter 7: Determ<strong>in</strong>ation Policies and Procedures.............................................................. 527.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 52iv


7.2 Components of driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations ........................................................... 537.3 Mak<strong>in</strong>g driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for persistent and episodic impairments . 547.4 Mak<strong>in</strong>g driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for <strong>in</strong>dividuals whose cognitive ability <strong>to</strong>drive may be persistently impaired ............................................................................. 557.5 Mak<strong>in</strong>g driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for <strong>in</strong>dividuals whose mo<strong>to</strong>r or sensoryfunction may be impaired or who may have episodic impairment of cognitivefunction ............................................................................................................................ 567.6 Review<strong>in</strong>g driv<strong>in</strong>g records ............................................................................................ 587.7 Consider<strong>in</strong>g specific driv<strong>in</strong>g or safety requirements................................................ 597.8 Consider<strong>in</strong>g whether an <strong>in</strong>dividual can compensate ................................................ 607.9 Impos<strong>in</strong>g restrictions and/or conditions ..................................................................... 627.10 Consider<strong>in</strong>g compliance with conditions or restrictions ......................................... 647.11 Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g re-assessment <strong>in</strong>tervals .......................................................................... 667.12 Communicat<strong>in</strong>g a decision............................................................................................ 717.13 Determ<strong>in</strong>ation procedures ............................................................................................ 73Chapter 8: Reconsideration Policies and Procedures .......................................................... 748.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 748.2 Conduct<strong>in</strong>g reconsiderations........................................................................................ 758.3 Reconsideration procedures ......................................................................................... 77PART 3: MEDICAL CONDITION CHAPTERS ...................................................................... 78Chapter 9: Introduction <strong>to</strong> the Medical Condition Chapters ............................................. 799.1 Purpose of the medical condition chapters ................................................................ 799.2 Source of the medical condition chapters .................................................................. 799.3 Source of the medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es ................................................................ 809.4 Medical condition chapter template............................................................................ 81Medical condition.............................................................................................................................. 81BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................... 81About the medical condition ....................................................................................................... 81Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of the medical condition ................................................................. 81The medical condition and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes ............................................................ 81Effect of the medical condition on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive ............................................... 81Compensation ................................................................................................................................ 82GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................... 82Private and commercial drivers who have X ........................................................................... 83Chapter 10: Medical Conditions at-a-Glance .......................................................................... 84Chapter 11: Diabetes – Hypoglycemia ...................................................................................... 85BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................... 8511.1 About diabetes and hypoglycemia ............................................................................... 8511.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of diabetes and hypoglycemia ........................................ 8611.3 Diabetes and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes ..................................................................... 8811.4 Effect of diabetes and hypoglycemia on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive ....................... 8811.5 Compensation ................................................................................................................. 89GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................... 9011.6 Private and commercial drivers with Type 2 diabetes that is not treated with<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> or <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> secretagogues ................................................................................... 90v


11.7 Private and commercial drivers with Type 2 diabetes that is treated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>secretagogues .................................................................................................................. 9111.8 Private drivers with diabetes treated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> .................................................... 9311.9 Commercial drivers with diabetes treated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> ........................................... 9511.10 Private drivers who have an episode of severe hypoglycemia ................................ 9811.11 Private drivers who have an episode of hypoglycemia unawareness................... 10011.12 Private drivers who have persistent hypoglycemia unawareness ........................ 10111.13 Commercial drivers who have an episode of severe hypoglycemia ..................... 10311.14 Commercial drivers who have an episode of hypoglycemia unawareness.......... 10511.15 Commercial drivers who have persistent hypoglycemia unawareness ............... 10711.16 Doc<strong>to</strong>r’s report on commercial driver with diabetes on <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> ........................... 10811.17 <strong>Drive</strong>r’s report – commercial driver with diabetes on <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> ............................. 110Chapter 12: Peripheral Vascular Diseases ............................................................................. 112BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 11212.1 About peripheral vascular diseases ........................................................................... 11212.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of peripheral vascular diseases .................................... 11312.3 Peripheral vascular diseases and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes ................................ 11412.4 Effect of peripheral vascular diseases on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive ................... 11412.5 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 116GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 11712.6 Private and commercial drivers with peripheral arterial disease ........................ 11712.7 Private drivers who have an aneurysm or dissection ............................................. 11912.8 Private and commercial drivers who have had surgery for an aneurysm ordissection ....................................................................................................................... 12012.9 Commercial drivers who have an aneurysm or dissection .................................... 12112.10 Private and commercial drivers who have deep-ve<strong>in</strong> thrombosis........................ 122Chapter 13: Musculoskeletal Conditions................................................................................ 123BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 12313.1 About musculoskeletal conditions ............................................................................. 12313.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of musculoskeletal conditions ....................................... 12313.3 Musculoskeletal conditions and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes ................................... 12413.4 Effect of musculoskeletal conditions on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive ..................... 12413.5 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 125GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 12713.6 Private and commercial drivers who have lost a limb ........................................... 12713.7 Private and commercial drivers who have a chronic musculoskeletal condition......................................................................................................................................... 128Chapter 14: Chronic Renal Disease......................................................................................... 130BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 13014.1 About chronic renal disease ....................................................................................... 13014.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of chronic renal disease ................................................. 13014.3 Chronic renal disease and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes ............................................ 13114.4 Effect of chronic renal disease on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive ................................ 13114.5 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 132GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 13314.6 Private and commercial drivers with stage 1 or 2 renal disease .......................... 133vi


14.7 Private and commercial drivers with stage 3 or 4 renal disease .......................... 13414.8 Private drivers with end-stage renal disease ........................................................... 13514.9 Commercial drivers with end-stage renal disease .................................................. 13614.10 Private and commercial drivers who have had a renal transplant ...................... 137Chapter 15: Respira<strong>to</strong>ry Diseases ............................................................................................ 138BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 13815.1 About respira<strong>to</strong>ry diseases ......................................................................................... 13815.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease .................. 13915.3 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes ............. 13915.4 Effect of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive 14015.5 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 140GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 14115.6 Private and commercial drivers with mild impairment ........................................ 14115.7 Private drivers with moderate impairment ............................................................. 14215.8 Commercial drivers with moderate impairment .................................................... 14315.9 Private drivers with severe impairment ................................................................... 14415.10 Commercial drivers with severe impairment or requir<strong>in</strong>g supplemental oxygen......................................................................................................................................... 14515.11 Private drivers requir<strong>in</strong>g supplemental oxygen ...................................................... 14615.12 Private and commercial drivers who have had a permanent tracheos<strong>to</strong>my ...... 148Chapter 16: Vestibular Disorders ............................................................................................ 149BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 14916.1 About vestibular disorders ......................................................................................... 14916.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of vestibular disorders ................................................... 15016.3 Vestibular disorders and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes .............................................. 15116.4 Effect of vestibular disorders on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive ................................. 15116.5 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 153GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 15416.6 Private and commercial drivers with recurrent episodes that occur with warn<strong>in</strong>gsymp<strong>to</strong>ms ....................................................................................................................... 15416.7 Private and commercial drivers with recurrent episodes that occur withoutwarn<strong>in</strong>g symp<strong>to</strong>ms ....................................................................................................... 15616.8 Private and commercial drivers with drop attacks ................................................ 15716.9 Private and commercial drivers who experience a s<strong>in</strong>gle episode of vestibulardysfunction .................................................................................................................... 15816.10 Private and commercial drivers with vestibular disorders result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> persistentimpairment .................................................................................................................... 159Chapter 17: Cardiovascular Disease and Disorders ............................................................. 160BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 16017.1 About cardiovascular disease ..................................................................................... 16017.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of cardiovascular disease .............................................. 16217.3 Cardiovascular disease and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes.......................................... 16217.4 Effect of cardiovascular disease on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive ............................. 16217.5 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 164GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 16517.6 Policy rationale ............................................................................................................. 165vii


17.7 Private and commercial drivers with congenital heart defects ............................ 16517.8 Private drivers with coronary artery disease .......................................................... 16617.9 Commercial drivers with coronary artery disease ................................................. 16717.10 Private and commercial drivers with asymp<strong>to</strong>matic coronary artery disease orstable ang<strong>in</strong>a ................................................................................................................. 16817.11 Private drivers who have had CABG surgery ......................................................... 16917.12 Commercial drivers who have had CABG surgery ................................................ 17017.13 Private and commercial drivers who have experienced cardiac arrest .............. 17117.14 Private and commercial drivers who have premature atrial or ventricularcontractions ................................................................................................................... 17217.15 Private drivers who have ventricular fibrillation with no reversible cause ....... 17317.16 Commercial drivers who have ventricular fibrillation with no reversible cause......................................................................................................................................... 17417.17 Private and commercial drivers who have hemodynamically unstable VT ....... 17517.18 Private drivers who have susta<strong>in</strong>ed VT and an LVEF of 30% ......................... 17717.20 Commercial drivers who have susta<strong>in</strong>ed VT and an LVEF of 30% ................ 17917.22 Private and commercial drivers who have non-susta<strong>in</strong>ed VT .............................. 18017.23 Private and commercial drivers who have had paroxysmal SVT, AF or AFL .. 18117.24 Private and commercial drivers who have had paroxysmal SVT, AF or AFLwith impaired consciousness ...................................................................................... 18217.25 Private and commercial drivers who have persistent or permanent paroxysmalSVT, AF or AFL ........................................................................................................... 18317.26 Private and commercial drivers who have s<strong>in</strong>us node dysfunction ..................... 18417.27 Private drivers with atrioventricular (AV) or <strong>in</strong>traventricular block ................ 18517.28 Commercial drivers with atrioventricular (AV) or <strong>in</strong>traventricular block ....... 18717.29 Private drivers with permanent pacemakers .......................................................... 18917.30 Commercial drivers with permanent pacemakers ................................................. 19017.31 Private drivers who have decl<strong>in</strong>ed an ICD or have an ICD implanted as primaryprophylaxis .................................................................................................................... 19117.32 Private drivers who have an ICD implanted as secondary prophylaxis forsusta<strong>in</strong>ed VT ................................................................................................................. 19217.33 Private drivers where ICD therapy (shock or ATP) has been delivered ............ 19317.34 Private drivers who have an ICD implanted as secondary prophylaxis for VF orVT ................................................................................................................................... 19417.35 Commercial drivers who have decl<strong>in</strong>ed an ICD or have an ICD implanted asprimary or secondary prophylaxis ............................................................................ 19517.36 Private drivers with <strong>in</strong>herited heart disease ............................................................ 19617.37 Commercial drivers with <strong>in</strong>herited heart disease ................................................... 19717.38 Private drivers with medically treated valvular heart disease ............................. 19817.39 Commercial drivers with medically treated aortic stenosis or sclerosis ............. 19917.40 Commercial drivers with medically treated aortic or mitral regurgitation ormitral stenosis ............................................................................................................... 20017.41 Private drivers with surgically treated valvular heart disease ............................. 20117.42 Commercial drivers with surgically treated valvular heart disease .................... 202viii


17.43 Private drivers with mitral valve prolapse .............................................................. 20317.44 Commercial drivers with mitral valve prolapse ..................................................... 20417.45 Private drivers with congestive heart failure .......................................................... 20517.45.1 Private drivers with Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) implantation ...... 20617.46 Commercial drivers with congestive heart failure ................................................. 20717.47 Private drivers with left ventricular dysfunction or cardiomyopathy ................ 20917.48 Commercial drivers with left ventricular dysfunction or cardiomyopathy ....... 21017.49 Private drivers with a heart transplant .................................................................... 21117.50 Commercial drivers with a heart transplant ........................................................... 21217.51 Private drivers with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy............................................... 21317.52 Commercial drivers with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy...................................... 21417.53 Syncope .......................................................................................................................... 21517.54 Private and commercial drivers with hypertension ............................................... 21517.55 CCS recommendations regard<strong>in</strong>g transient conditions ......................................... 216Chapter 18: Hear<strong>in</strong>g Loss ......................................................................................................... 219BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 21918.1 About hear<strong>in</strong>g loss ....................................................................................................... 21918.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of hear<strong>in</strong>g loss ................................................................. 21918.3 Hear<strong>in</strong>g loss and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes............................................................. 21918.4 Effect of hear<strong>in</strong>g loss on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive ................................................ 22018.5 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 220GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 22118.6 Private drivers with hear<strong>in</strong>g loss ............................................................................... 22118.7 Commercial drivers with hear<strong>in</strong>g loss ...................................................................... 22218.8 Hear<strong>in</strong>g report .............................................................................................................. 224Chapter 19: Psychiatric Disorders........................................................................................... 226BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 22619.1 About psychiatric disorders ....................................................................................... 22619.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of psychiatric disorders ................................................. 23019.3 Psychiatric disorders and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes ............................................. 23119.4 Effect of psychiatric disorders on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive................................ 23319.5 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 236GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 23719.6 Private and commercial drivers with a psychiatric disorder or psychotic episode......................................................................................................................................... 237Chapter 20: Cerebrovascular Disease ..................................................................................... 239BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 23920.1 About cerebrovascular disease .................................................................................. 23920.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of cerebrovascular disease ............................................ 24020.3 Cerebrovascular disease and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes ....................................... 24120.4 Effect of cerebrovascular disease on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive ........................... 24220.5 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 244GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 24520.6 Private and commercial drivers who have had a TIA ........................................... 24520.7 Private and commercial drivers who have had a CVA .......................................... 246ix


20.8 Private and commercial drivers who have a cerebral aneurysm that requiresrepair .............................................................................................................................. 24820.9 Private drivers who have had surgery <strong>to</strong> repair a cerebral aneurysm................ 24920.10 Commercial drivers who have had surgery <strong>to</strong> repair a cerebral aneurysm....... 251Chapter 21: Vision Impairment ............................................................................................... 252BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 25221.1 About vision impairment ............................................................................................ 25221.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of vision impairments .................................................... 25921.3 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of medical conditions caus<strong>in</strong>g vision impairments.... 26021.4 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of vision impairments result<strong>in</strong>g from medicaltreatments...................................................................................................................... 26121.5 Vision impairments and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes................................................ 26121.6 Effect of vision impairments on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive ................................... 26321.7 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 264GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 26621.8 Private drivers with impaired visual acuity............................................................. 26621.9 Commercial drivers with impaired visual acuity.................................................... 26821.10 Private drivers with visual field loss ......................................................................... 27021.11 Commercial drivers with visual field loss ................................................................ 27221.12 Private drivers with a loss of stereoscopic depth perception or monocularity . 27421.13 Commercial drivers with a loss of stereoscopic depth perception or monocularity......................................................................................................................................... 27521.14 Private and commercial drivers with diplopia ........................................................ 27621.15 Private and commercial drivers with impaired colour vision .............................. 27721.16 Snellen chart and standard rat<strong>in</strong>gs of visual acuity ............................................... 27821.17 Visual field impairments ............................................................................................. 27921.18 Exam<strong>in</strong>ation of visual functions form (EVF) .......................................................... 28121.19 Visual field test form (VFT) ....................................................................................... 28421.20 Recommended procedures for test<strong>in</strong>g visual functions ......................................... 286Chapter 22: Syncope .................................................................................................................. 288BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 28822.1 About syncope............................................................................................................... 28822.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of syncope ........................................................................ 28922.3 Syncope and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes .................................................................... 28922.4 Effect of syncope on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive ....................................................... 28922.5 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 290GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 29022.6 Policy rationale ............................................................................................................. 29022.7 Private drivers who have had a s<strong>in</strong>gle episode of syncope .................................... 29122.8 Private drivers with syncope with a treated or reversible cause .......................... 29222.9 Private drivers with recurrent typical vasovagal syncope or situational syncope......................................................................................................................................... 29322.10 Private drivers with recurrent atypical vasovagal syncope or unexpla<strong>in</strong>edsyncope ........................................................................................................................... 29422.11 Commercial drivers who have had a s<strong>in</strong>gle episode of typical vasovagal syncope......................................................................................................................................... 295x


22.12 Commercial drivers with syncope with a treated or reversible cause ................. 29622.13 Commercial drivers with recurrent situational syncope ....................................... 29722.14 Commercial drivers with atypical vasovagal syncope, unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed syncope orrecurrent typical vasovagal syncope ......................................................................... 298Chapter 23: Seizures and Epilepsy .......................................................................................... 299BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 29923.1 About seizures and epilepsy ....................................................................................... 29923.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of seizures and epilepsy ................................................. 30223.3 Seizures and epilepsy and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes ............................................. 30223.4 Effect of seizures and epilepsy on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive................................ 30223.5 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 303GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 30323.6 Policy rationale ............................................................................................................. 30323.7 Private and commercial drivers with provoked seizures caused by a structuralbra<strong>in</strong> abnormality ........................................................................................................ 30423.8 Private and commercial drivers with provoked seizures with no structural bra<strong>in</strong>abnormality ................................................................................................................... 30523.9 Private and commercial drivers with alcohol-related provoked seizures ........... 30623.10 Private drivers with s<strong>in</strong>gle unprovoked seizures .................................................... 30723.11 Commercial drivers with s<strong>in</strong>gle unprovoked seizures ........................................... 30823.12 Private drivers with epilepsy ...................................................................................... 30923.13 Private drivers who have epileptic seizures while asleep or upon awaken<strong>in</strong>g ... 31023.14 Private drivers with epilepsy who experience simple partial seizures ................ 31123.15 Private drivers who have had surgery for epilepsy ................................................ 31223.16 Private drivers with epilepsy who change medication ........................................... 31323.17 Commercial drivers with epilepsy ............................................................................. 31423.18 Commercial drivers with epilepsy who change medication .................................. 315Chapter 24: Neurological disorders ........................................................................................ 316BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 31624.1 About neurological disorders ..................................................................................... 31624.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of neurological disorders ............................................... 31824.3 Neurological disorders and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes .......................................... 31824.4 Effect of neurological disorders on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive ............................. 31924.5 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 321GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 32224.6 Private and commercial drivers with a neurological disorder ............................. 322Chapter 25: Traumatic Bra<strong>in</strong> Injury ...................................................................................... 324BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 32425.1 About traumatic bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>jury .................................................................................... 32425.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of traumatic bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>jury .............................................. 32525.3 Traumatic bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>jury and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes ......................................... 32525.4 Effect of traumatic bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>jury on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive ............................ 32525.5 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 326GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 32725.6 Private and commercial drivers with a traumatic bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>jury ........................... 327Chapter 26: Intracranial Tumours.......................................................................................... 329xi


BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 32926.1 About <strong>in</strong>tracranial tumours ....................................................................................... 32926.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of <strong>in</strong>tracranial tumours ................................................. 32926.3 Intracranial tumours and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes ............................................. 33026.4 Effect of <strong>in</strong>tracranial tumours on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive................................ 33026.5 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 330GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 33226.6 Private and commercial drivers with an <strong>in</strong>tracranial tumour ............................. 332Chapter 27: Cognitive Impairment <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Dementia ..................................................... 334BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 33427.1 About cognitive impairment and dementia ............................................................. 33427.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of cognitive impairment and dementia ....................... 33727.3 Cognitive impairment, dementia and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes ......................... 33727.4 Effect of cognitive impairment and dementia on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive ...... 33927.5 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 339GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 34027.6 Private and commercial drivers with cognitive impairment or dementia .......... 340Chapter 28: Sleep Disorders ..................................................................................................... 341BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 34128.1 About sleep disorders .................................................................................................. 34128.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of sleep disorders ............................................................ 34428.3 Sleep disorders and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes ....................................................... 34428.4 Effect of sleep disorders on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive .......................................... 34428.5 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 345GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 34628.6 Private and commercial drivers with untreated OSA............................................ 34628.7 Private and commercial drivers with treated OSA ................................................ 34828.8 Private drivers with narcolepsy ................................................................................. 35028.9 Commercial drivers with narcolepsy ........................................................................ 352Chapter 29: Prescription and Over-The-Counter Drugs..................................................... 353BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 35329.1 About psychotropic drugs........................................................................................... 35329.2 Prevalence ..................................................................................................................... 35729.3 Psychotropic drugs and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes ................................................ 35829.4 Effect of psychotropic drugs on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive ................................... 36029.5 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 363GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 36429.6 Private and commercial drivers who use psychotropic drugs .............................. 364Chapter 30: General Debility and Lack of Stam<strong>in</strong>a ............................................................. 366BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 36630.1 About general debility and lack of stam<strong>in</strong>a ............................................................. 36630.2 Effect of general debility and lack of stam<strong>in</strong>a on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive ..... 36730.3 Compensation ............................................................................................................... 367GUIDELINES ............................................................................................................................. 36830.4 Private and commercial drivers with frailty, weakness or general debility ....... 36830.5 Private and commercial drivers with a lack of stam<strong>in</strong>a ........................................ 369xii


PART 4: APPENDICES ............................................................................................................... 370Appendix 1: Glossary of Terms ............................................................................................ 371Appendix 2: Excerpts from the MVA .................................................................................. 376Appendix 3: Ag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Drive</strong>rs .................................................................................................... 381Appendix 4: Licence Classes ................................................................................................. 385Appendix 5: Draft<strong>in</strong>g and Approval Process ...................................................................... 387Appendix 6: The Relationship between <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Policy and Policy <strong>in</strong> OtherJurisdictions .................................................................................................................. 388xiii


PART 1:BACKGROUND1


Chapter 1:Introduction1.1 How this Manual is organizedThis Manual consists of 4 parts.This first part, Background, provides the necessary context for therema<strong>in</strong>der of the manual. The 3 chapters with<strong>in</strong> this part are:Chapter 1: Introduction, which expla<strong>in</strong>s the purpose of the Manualand the new developments that have <strong>in</strong>fluenced OSMV’s approach <strong>to</strong>driver fitnessChapter 2: The <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program, which provides an overviewof the authority for, and activities of, the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program, aswell as the roles and responsibilities of the various <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong>Program partners, andChapter 3: <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples, which are thefoundation for the policies and procedures presented <strong>in</strong> Parts 2 and 3of the manual.The second part, Policies and Procedures, outl<strong>in</strong>es OSMV policies andprocedures applicable <strong>to</strong> each of the four activities of the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong>Program. The five chapters with<strong>in</strong> this part are entitled:Chapter 4: Introduction <strong>to</strong> the Policies and ProceduresChapter 5: Screen<strong>in</strong>g Policies. Because screen<strong>in</strong>g is largelyconducted by OSMV’s <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program partners, proceduresare not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this chapter.Chapter 6: Assessment Policies and ProceduresChapter 7: Determ<strong>in</strong>ation Policies and Procedures, andChapter 8: Reconsideration Policies and Procedures.The third part of the Manual conta<strong>in</strong>s the medical condition chapters. Thefirst chapter <strong>in</strong> this part, Chapter 9, is an <strong>in</strong>troduction that outl<strong>in</strong>es thepurpose and the format of the medical condition chapters. Chapter 10:Medical Conditions at-a-Glance, is a table that may be used as a quickreference <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e how each of the identified medical conditionsaffects the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g. Chapters 11 through 31 are theactual medical condition chapters.The fourth part of the Manual conta<strong>in</strong>s the Appendices. These <strong>in</strong>clude:Appendix 1: Glossary of Terms used throughout the Manual2


Appendix 2: Excerpts from the MVA that are relevant <strong>to</strong> the <strong>Drive</strong>r<strong>Fitness</strong> ProgramAppendix 3: Ag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Drive</strong>rs, which describes the research <strong>in</strong> support ofrout<strong>in</strong>e screen<strong>in</strong>g of drivers who are 80 years of age and olderAppendix 4: Licence Classes, which describes the various classes ofdriver’s licencesAppendix 5: Draft<strong>in</strong>g and Approval Process, which describes how themedical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es were drafted and approvedAppendix 6: The Relationship between <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Policy andPolicy <strong>in</strong> other Jurisdictions, which is primarily of relevance <strong>to</strong>commercial drivers who wish <strong>to</strong> drive <strong>in</strong> the United States, and1.2 Purpose of this ManualThis Manual documents the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program policy and proceduresof the Office of the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles. It is <strong>to</strong> be used byOSMV staff when mak<strong>in</strong>g driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations.1.3 A chang<strong>in</strong>g approach <strong>to</strong> driver fitnessPrior <strong>to</strong> the publication of this Manual, OSMV and health carepractitioners <strong>in</strong> <strong>BC</strong> relied on the 1997 <strong>Guide</strong> for Physicians <strong>in</strong>Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>Fitness</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Drive</strong> a Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicle, 7 th edition (the <strong>Guide</strong>).The <strong>Guide</strong> was drafted <strong>in</strong> partnership between OSMV and the BritishColumbia Medical Association (<strong>BC</strong>MA) and was published by the <strong>BC</strong>MAfor use by both physicians and OSMV.The guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> the 1997 <strong>Guide</strong> were based on a diagnostic model fordeterm<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g driver fitness. That is, guidel<strong>in</strong>es were based primarily on themedical condition and the presumed group characteristics of people withthat condition rather than on how the medical condition affected thefunctions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g on an <strong>in</strong>dividual basis. In terms of anevidentiary basis, the <strong>Guide</strong> reflected the consensus op<strong>in</strong>ion of practic<strong>in</strong>gphysicians <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g members of specialty sections with<strong>in</strong> the <strong>BC</strong>MA.S<strong>in</strong>ce the 1997 edition, three developments have had a significant impac<strong>to</strong>n driver fitness policy <strong>in</strong> <strong>BC</strong>:3


1. A Supreme Court of Canada decision established the requirement <strong>to</strong><strong>in</strong>dividually assess drivers. The ‘Grismer’ 1 case held that each drivermust be assessed accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the driver’s own personal abilities ratherthan presumed group characteristics.2. OSMV has adopted a functional approach <strong>to</strong> driver fitness. Thismeans that OSMV assesses the impact of a medical condition on thefunctions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g when mak<strong>in</strong>g driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ations. The functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g are described <strong>in</strong>3.3. Where a medical condition results <strong>in</strong> a persistent impairment ofthe functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMV bases its driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ation on the results of functional assessments that observe ormeasure the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g. If the impairment isepisodic, the impact of the medical condition on the functionsnecessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g cannot be functionally assessed and OSMV basesits driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation on the results of medical assessments.These concepts are expla<strong>in</strong>ed fully <strong>in</strong> 6.5.3. OSMV has <strong>in</strong>creased its emphasis on us<strong>in</strong>g research evidence, where itexists, as the basis of its driver fitness policies. Each medicalcondition <strong>in</strong> Part 3 of this Manual is <strong>in</strong>cluded because the bestavailable evidence shows that the medical condition causesimpairment of one or more of the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g orhas been associated with an elevated risk of crash or impaired driv<strong>in</strong>gperformance. This <strong>in</strong>formation has been drawn from the <strong>in</strong>tegrativereview performed by Dr. Bonnie Dobbs and documented <strong>in</strong> her reportMedical Conditions and Driv<strong>in</strong>g: Current Knowledge <strong>2010</strong> (pend<strong>in</strong>g).1 British Columbia (Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles) v. British Columbia (Council of Human Rights), [1999] 3S.C.R. 8684


Chapter 2: The <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program2.1 The legal and policy authority for the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> ProgramThe Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicle Act [RS<strong>BC</strong> 1996] Chapter 318The Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicle Act (MVA) provides the statu<strong>to</strong>ry authority for the<strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program.Section 25 describes the statu<strong>to</strong>ry requirements regard<strong>in</strong>g the applicationfor and issuance of a driver’s licence. It sets out the authority of theSuper<strong>in</strong>tendent <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e that applicants for various classes of driver’slicences are able and fit <strong>to</strong> drive safely and <strong>to</strong> require an <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>to</strong> beexam<strong>in</strong>ed as <strong>to</strong> their fitness and ability <strong>to</strong> drive. It also authorizes theSuper<strong>in</strong>tendent <strong>to</strong> impose restrictions and conditions. Relevant portions ofsection 25 are reproduced <strong>in</strong> Appendix 2.Section 29 extends the authority of the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>ewhether holders (post-licence) of various classes of driver’s licences areable and fit <strong>to</strong> drive safely and authorizes the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent <strong>to</strong> require aholder <strong>to</strong> be exam<strong>in</strong>ed as <strong>to</strong> their fitness and ability <strong>to</strong> drive. The full tex<strong>to</strong>f section 29 is <strong>in</strong> Appendix 2.Section 92 authorizes the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent <strong>to</strong> direct the InsuranceCorporation of British Columbia (IC<strong>BC</strong>) <strong>to</strong> cancel any class of driver’slicence, cancel and issue a different class of driver’s licence or prohibit adriver if the driver has a medical condition affect<strong>in</strong>g fitness and ability <strong>to</strong>drive. It also authorizes the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent <strong>to</strong> direct IC<strong>BC</strong> <strong>to</strong> cancel adriver’s licence if the driver does not submit <strong>to</strong> an exam theSuper<strong>in</strong>tendent has required <strong>to</strong> assess fitness and ability <strong>to</strong> drive safely.The full text of section 92 is <strong>in</strong> Appendix 2.The relationship between the MVA and OSMV driver fitnesspolicyPolicy plays an important role <strong>in</strong> the work of a regula<strong>to</strong>ry body. Tounderstand this role, OSMV decision-makers need <strong>to</strong> be familiar with therelationship between the MVA and OSMV policy.LegislationThe primary statement of law is written <strong>in</strong> legislation. Legislationprovides ‘rules’ that must be followed without exception or the exercise ofdiscretion. Because legislation sets out ‘rules,’ it is broadly written. The5


f<strong>in</strong>er po<strong>in</strong>ts of law are left <strong>to</strong> be def<strong>in</strong>ed and set out <strong>in</strong> regulation andpolicy. This allows for greater flexibility and, <strong>in</strong> the case of policy, theexercise of discretion.RegulationsRegulations primarily fill <strong>in</strong> the details of legislation. Like legislation,regulations are law. However, they are subord<strong>in</strong>ate legislation made underthe authority of the statute. An advantage of regulations over legislation isthat they are easier <strong>to</strong> change or repeal. By amend<strong>in</strong>g regulations, thegovernment can adapt quickly <strong>to</strong> chang<strong>in</strong>g program needs and operationalissues. There are no regulations under the MVA relat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> driver fitness.Policy<strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program policy is not passed by the government but isdeveloped and approved with<strong>in</strong> OSMV. Policy is generally b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g onprogram operations and will generally be upheld by a judicial or quasijudicialbody.Policy is how OSMV implements the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent’s authority under theMVA. The MVA authorizes the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent <strong>to</strong> require a medicalexam<strong>in</strong>ation before grant<strong>in</strong>g a driver's licence. The policies articulated <strong>in</strong>this Manual provide the level of detail required by OSMV <strong>to</strong> assess anddeterm<strong>in</strong>e driver fitness.Policy can take many forms. In Chapters 5 through 8 of this Manual,<strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program policy is presented as <strong>in</strong>dividually numberedpolicy statements. In the medical condition chapters, <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong>Program policy is presented as:guidel<strong>in</strong>es for the use of assessmentsmedical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es, andre-assessment <strong>in</strong>terval guidel<strong>in</strong>es.When mak<strong>in</strong>g driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations, OSMV decision-makers willgenerally refer <strong>to</strong> both the general policy statements from Chapters 5through 8 and the specific guidel<strong>in</strong>es relevant <strong>to</strong> particular medicalconditions from the medical condition chapters. Because each driver isunique and determ<strong>in</strong>ations are made on an <strong>in</strong>dividual basis, the medicalcondition chapters present “guidel<strong>in</strong>es” rather than hard rules that must befollowed without exception.OSMV decision-makers need the policies and guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> this Manual <strong>to</strong>provide a framework for the exercise of their discretionary powers. Ifthere are no criteria <strong>to</strong> guide decisions, the decisions may be arbitrary and,over time, <strong>in</strong>consistent. The policies <strong>in</strong> this Manual provide a framework6


for the exercise of discretion by OSMV staff responsible for driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ations.2.2 <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program overviewThe <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program assesses about 120,000 drivers annually. Inan average year, 3,400 drivers have their driv<strong>in</strong>g privileges cancelled ordenied for fitness reasons and 2,500 have their driv<strong>in</strong>g privileges restrictedor reduced.The flowcharts follow<strong>in</strong>g this section of text highlight the four keyactivities of the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program: Screen<strong>in</strong>g, Assessment,Determ<strong>in</strong>ation and Reconsideration.Screen<strong>in</strong>g identifies:<strong>in</strong>dividuals who have a known or possible medical condition that mayimpair their functional ability <strong>to</strong> drivecommercial drivers, andag<strong>in</strong>g drivers.Screen<strong>in</strong>g policies are documented <strong>in</strong> Chapter 5 of this Manual.Assessment is the process of collect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation required <strong>to</strong> make adriver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation. The key assessment used for driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ations is a driver’s medical exam<strong>in</strong>ation completed by a physician– usually a driver’s general practitioner or specialist. Information gathereddur<strong>in</strong>g the medical exam<strong>in</strong>ation is documented on the <strong>Drive</strong>r MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation Report (DMER). A variety of other assessments may also berequired, such as specialist exam<strong>in</strong>ations or road tests. Assessmentpolicies and procedures are documented <strong>in</strong> Chapter 6 of this Manual.7


Determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong>volves review<strong>in</strong>g:the <strong>in</strong>formation obta<strong>in</strong>ed from assessmentsany other relevant file <strong>in</strong>formation, such as driv<strong>in</strong>g his<strong>to</strong>ry, andthe medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Part 3 of this Manualand determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whether an <strong>in</strong>dividual is fit <strong>to</strong> drive. Policies andprocedures that govern the determ<strong>in</strong>ation process are outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 7of this Manual.Reconsideration is the process of review<strong>in</strong>g a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ationupon request of an <strong>in</strong>dividual who was found not fit <strong>to</strong> drive, or who hadrestrictions or conditions imposed. Policies and procedures that governthe reconsideration process are outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 8 of this Manual.8


1. SCREENINGA driver disclosesa medicalcondition <strong>to</strong> IC<strong>BC</strong>,or fails visionscreen<strong>in</strong>g, atlicence applicationor renewalTheOSMVreceivesacrediblereportTheOSMVreceivesa reportpursuant<strong>to</strong> MVAs. 230A scheduledreassessment<strong>in</strong>tervalexpiresA driver turns80 or a rout<strong>in</strong>eage relatedscreen<strong>in</strong>g isdueA driver appliesfor acommercialclass licence ora rout<strong>in</strong>ecommercialscreen<strong>in</strong>g is dueA DMER is mailed <strong>to</strong> the driver2. ASSESSMENT (subject <strong>to</strong> revision)A physician conducts a driver’s medical exam<strong>in</strong>ation,documents the results on the DMER and sends the DMER <strong>to</strong>the OSMVAn <strong>in</strong>take agent reviews the DMER and any other relevant<strong>in</strong>formation and decides whether a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ationis requiredIs a determ<strong>in</strong>ationrequired?NoYesIs a reassessmentInterval required?NoEnd of processYesThe <strong>in</strong>take agent schedules areassessmentAn adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case manager reviews the DMER and anyother relevant <strong>in</strong>formation and decides whether further<strong>in</strong>formation is required <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> make a determ<strong>in</strong>ationIs further <strong>in</strong>formationrequired?NoTo3. Determ<strong>in</strong>ationYesThe adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or casemanager requestsmedical and/orfunctional assessments9


3. DETERMINATIONFrom2. AssessmentAn adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case manager reviews the DMER and anyother assessment results, driv<strong>in</strong>g record, other <strong>in</strong>formation onfile and medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es and determ<strong>in</strong>es whetherdriver is fit <strong>to</strong> driveIs the driver fit <strong>to</strong> drive?NoYesIs a reassessmentInterval required?The adjudica<strong>to</strong>r orcase manager sendsthe driver a lettercommunicat<strong>in</strong>g thedeterm<strong>in</strong>ationYesNoThe adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case managerschedules a reassessmentAre conditions orrestrictions required?YesNoEnd of process4. RECONSIDERATIONNoDoes the driver ask for areview of the decision?YesAn adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case manager reconsiders the decisionand may request additional assessments. At theconclusion of the reconsideration, the adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or casemanager sends the <strong>in</strong>dividual a letter either confirm<strong>in</strong>g theorig<strong>in</strong>al determ<strong>in</strong>ation or substitut<strong>in</strong>g a new determ<strong>in</strong>ationEnd of process10


2.3 Roles and responsibilitiesOSMV works <strong>in</strong> partnership with IC<strong>BC</strong> and other agencies, such as the<strong>BC</strong>MA, <strong>to</strong> implement and adm<strong>in</strong>ister the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program. Thefollow<strong>in</strong>g paragraphs highlight the roles and responsibilities of the keyparticipants <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program.Office of the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r VehiclesOn a day-<strong>to</strong>-day basis, driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations are made by OSMVcase managers and adjudica<strong>to</strong>rs. Case managers and adjudica<strong>to</strong>rs alsoseek advice from OSMV Medical Consultant and the Assistant Direc<strong>to</strong>r ofHear<strong>in</strong>gs and Fair Practices, where necessary. The roles of various OSMVstaff with<strong>in</strong> the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program are described <strong>in</strong> the paragraphsbelow.Intake agents perform an <strong>in</strong>itial review of DMERs and other assessmentresults that are sent <strong>to</strong> OSMV. They identify those <strong>in</strong>dividuals who clearlymeet the medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Part 3 of this Manualwithout the need for further assessment or a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation.They identify and forward cases that require an exercise of discretion <strong>to</strong>adjudica<strong>to</strong>rs and case managers.The procedures that guide the work of <strong>in</strong>take agents are documented <strong>in</strong>the:Intake Agent Triage Sort ProceduresIntake Agent <strong>Guide</strong>l<strong>in</strong>es for Assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Fitness</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Drive</strong>, andIntake Agent Procedures Manual.Adjudica<strong>to</strong>rs are responsible for mak<strong>in</strong>g decisions on medicallyuncomplicated cases; they may exercise discretion <strong>in</strong> decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g.Case managers are registered nurses responsible for mak<strong>in</strong>g decisions onmedically complicated cases; they may exercise discretion <strong>in</strong> decisionmak<strong>in</strong>g.The Medical Consultant is a physician who provides medical advice andop<strong>in</strong>ion on an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s fitness <strong>to</strong> drive <strong>to</strong> both adjudica<strong>to</strong>rs and casemanagers.The Assistant Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Hear<strong>in</strong>gs and Fair Practices provides advice <strong>to</strong>adjudica<strong>to</strong>rs and case managers on complicated cases, <strong>in</strong> particular, caseswhere unique restrictions or conditions may be required and cases underreconsideration.11


IC<strong>BC</strong>In partnership with OSMV and under delegation, IC<strong>BC</strong> performs someadm<strong>in</strong>istrative functions for the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program. In carry<strong>in</strong>g outpowers or responsibilities delegated <strong>to</strong> it under section 117(1) of theMVA, IC<strong>BC</strong> must act <strong>in</strong> accordance with any directives issued by theSuper<strong>in</strong>tendent.IC<strong>BC</strong> also plays an important role <strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g. Through directquestion<strong>in</strong>g on a day-<strong>to</strong>-day basis, either at the time of <strong>in</strong>itial licens<strong>in</strong>g orlicence renewal, IC<strong>BC</strong> Po<strong>in</strong>ts of Service staff identify <strong>in</strong>dividuals whohave a medical condition that may impair the functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g. An <strong>in</strong>dividual apply<strong>in</strong>g for a driver’s licence must also take avision screen<strong>in</strong>g test at the IC<strong>BC</strong> Po<strong>in</strong>t of Service. If an <strong>in</strong>dividualdiscloses a medical condition or fails the vision screen<strong>in</strong>g test, IC<strong>BC</strong> staffmay <strong>in</strong>itiate a DMER or may decide not <strong>to</strong> issue a driver’s licence untilOSMV <strong>in</strong>dicates that the <strong>in</strong>dividual is fit <strong>to</strong> drive.As the driver licens<strong>in</strong>g authority for the prov<strong>in</strong>ce, IC<strong>BC</strong> has its ownrequirements that may impact <strong>in</strong>dividuals who have been the subject of anOSMV driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation. For example, IC<strong>BC</strong> will not issue alicence <strong>to</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual who hasn’t held a licence for more than 3 yearsunless the <strong>in</strong>dividual takes an IC<strong>BC</strong> road test. This means that OSMVmay determ<strong>in</strong>e that an <strong>in</strong>dividual whose licence was cancelled for fitnessreasons is now fit <strong>to</strong> drive because of an improvement <strong>in</strong> their medicalcondition, but IC<strong>BC</strong> may require successful completion of a road testbefore issu<strong>in</strong>g a new licence.12


Medical practitionersMedical practitioners also play a role <strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g. Under section 230 ofthe MVA, registered psychologists, op<strong>to</strong>metrists and medical practitionersmust report <strong>to</strong> OSMV if:a patient has a medical condition that makes it dangerous <strong>to</strong> thepatient, or <strong>to</strong> the public, for the patient <strong>to</strong> drive a mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle, andcont<strong>in</strong>ues <strong>to</strong> drive after the psychologist, op<strong>to</strong>metrist or medicalpractitioner warns the patient of the danger.The full text of section 230 is <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Appendix 2.In addition <strong>to</strong> this report<strong>in</strong>g duty, medical practitioners conductassessments and provide <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>to</strong> OSMV on a patient’s prognosis,treatment and extent of impairment. Sometimes medical practitioners areasked <strong>to</strong> comment directly on driv<strong>in</strong>g ability.Allied health care practitionersAllied health care practitioners such as occupational therapists, driverrehabilitation therapists and physiotherapists may be asked <strong>to</strong> conductassessments of drivers.Individual driversWhen apply<strong>in</strong>g for or renew<strong>in</strong>g a British Columbia driver’s licence of anyclass, <strong>in</strong>dividuals are asked if they have any medical conditions that affectdriv<strong>in</strong>g. When an applicant reports a medical condition that could affectthe functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, a DMER is generally issued. The<strong>in</strong>dividual is responsible for tak<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>to</strong> their doc<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> be completed.Based on <strong>in</strong>formation provided by the physician on the DMER, an<strong>in</strong>dividual may be required <strong>to</strong> submit <strong>to</strong> additional assessments for OSMV<strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e their fitness <strong>to</strong> drive.Once a determ<strong>in</strong>ation is made, <strong>in</strong>dividuals must comply with anyconditions or restrictions imposed by OSMV or, if their licence iscancelled, surrender the licence <strong>to</strong> IC<strong>BC</strong>. Individuals are <strong>in</strong>formed ofconditions, restrictions and licence cancellations <strong>in</strong> a letter from OSMV.Commercial drivers who wish <strong>to</strong> drive outside of <strong>BC</strong>Commercial drivers who wish <strong>to</strong> drive outside of <strong>BC</strong> must familiarizethemselves with any medical condition-related restrictions or prohibitions13


applicable <strong>in</strong> other jurisdictions. Appendix 6 provides an overview of therelationship between <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program policy and policiesapplicable <strong>to</strong> commercial drivers who wish <strong>to</strong> drive <strong>in</strong> the United States.14


Chapter 3:<strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples3.1 OverviewOSMV has articulated the follow<strong>in</strong>g four pr<strong>in</strong>ciples that guide the <strong>Drive</strong>r<strong>Fitness</strong> Program. By follow<strong>in</strong>g these pr<strong>in</strong>ciples, OSMV ensures thatdrivers are given the maximum licens<strong>in</strong>g privilege possible tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong>account their medical condition, its impact on the functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g and the driver’s ability <strong>to</strong> compensate for the condition.Risk management1. Public safety is the primary consideration when mak<strong>in</strong>g driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ations, but a degree of risk <strong>to</strong> public safety may be <strong>to</strong>lerated <strong>in</strong>order <strong>to</strong> allow a broad range of people <strong>to</strong> drive.Functional approach2. <strong>Drive</strong>r fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations will be based primarily on functionalability <strong>to</strong> drive, not diagnosisIndividual assessment3. <strong>Drive</strong>r fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations will be based on <strong>in</strong>dividualcharacteristics and abilities rather than presumed group characteristicsand abilities.Best <strong>in</strong>formation4. <strong>Drive</strong>r fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations will be based on the best <strong>in</strong>formation thatis available.Each of these pr<strong>in</strong>ciples is expla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g sections.15


3.2 Risk managementPublic safety is the primary consideration when mak<strong>in</strong>g driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ations, but a degree of risk <strong>to</strong> public safety may be <strong>to</strong>lerated <strong>in</strong>order <strong>to</strong> allow a broad range of people <strong>to</strong> drive.While public safety is the primary consideration <strong>in</strong> driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ations, it is not the only consideration. In Grismer, the SupremeCourt of Canada <strong>in</strong>dicated that people with some level of functionalimpairment may have a licence because society can <strong>to</strong>lerate a degree ofrisk <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> permit a wide range of people <strong>to</strong> drive. In its decision, thecourt states:“Strik<strong>in</strong>g a balance between the need for people <strong>to</strong> be licensed <strong>to</strong> driveand the need for safety of the public on the roads, [the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent]adopted a standard that <strong>to</strong>lerated a moderate degree of risk. TheSuper<strong>in</strong>tendent did not aim for perfection, nor for absolute safety. TheSuper<strong>in</strong>tendent rather accepted that a degree of disability and theassociated <strong>in</strong>creased risk <strong>to</strong> highway safety is a necessary trade-off forthe policy objectives of permitt<strong>in</strong>g a wide range of people <strong>to</strong> drive andnot discrim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st the disabled. The goal was not absolutesafety, but reasonable safety.” [para. 27] [emphasis added]To achieve this balance between road safety and an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s need <strong>to</strong>drive, OSMV applies a risk management approach <strong>to</strong> driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ations. This means that, when mak<strong>in</strong>g a driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ation, OSMV considers the degree of risk presented by an<strong>in</strong>dividual driver. If OSMV’s analysis <strong>in</strong>dicates a high degree of risk, the<strong>in</strong>dividual is not fit <strong>to</strong> drive.How does OSMV determ<strong>in</strong>e the degree of risk presented by an <strong>in</strong>dividualdriver?Risk is often def<strong>in</strong>ed as a formula; that is, risk is the likelihood of anuncerta<strong>in</strong> event multiplied by the consequence if the event were <strong>to</strong> takeplace. This means that a highly likely event with serious consequences isa greater risk than an unlikely event with m<strong>in</strong>or consequences.Unfortunately, there are no reliable formulas <strong>to</strong> calculate risk as it relates<strong>to</strong> fitness <strong>to</strong> drive. The impact of a medical condition may be specific <strong>to</strong>an <strong>in</strong>dividual and the ability <strong>to</strong> compensate for the medical condition mayalso vary by <strong>in</strong>dividual. As well, because the driv<strong>in</strong>g environment iscomplex and cont<strong>in</strong>uously chang<strong>in</strong>g, it is difficult <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e exactlywhat level of impairment means a person is not fit <strong>to</strong> drive.16


Because of these limitations, OSMV cannot precisely calculate the riskpresented by a driver with a particular medical condition. However,OSMV can determ<strong>in</strong>e the general degree of risk presented by a driver witha particular medical condition by us<strong>in</strong>g a risk assessment analysis thattakes <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> account:research associat<strong>in</strong>g the medical condition with adverse driv<strong>in</strong>goutcomes or evidence of functional impairmentexpert op<strong>in</strong>ion regard<strong>in</strong>g the degree of risk associated with the medicalcondition at various severity levels, andthe <strong>in</strong>dividual characteristics and abilities of each driver, for examplewhether the driver:o is a commercial or private drivero can compensate for the functional impairmen<strong>to</strong> is compliant with their treatment regime, ando has <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the impact that their medical condition mayhave on driv<strong>in</strong>g.The policies outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this manual guide OSMV decision-makers <strong>in</strong>determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the degree of risk presented by <strong>in</strong>dividual drivers. Themedical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the medical condition chapters ofthis manual are based on the best available evidence regard<strong>in</strong>g degree ofrisk and identify where the use of conditions, restrictions and/orcompensation strategies may be appropriate <strong>to</strong> reduce risk. If the riskassociated with a medical condition at a certa<strong>in</strong> severity level is high, andthe risk cannot be reduced through the use of conditions, restrictionsand/or compensation strategies, the guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>dicate that an <strong>in</strong>dividualis not fit <strong>to</strong> drive. By apply<strong>in</strong>g the medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es, OSMVdecision-makers are practis<strong>in</strong>g risk management.3.3 Functional approach<strong>Drive</strong>r fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations will be based on a functional approach <strong>to</strong>driver fitness.OSMV takes a functional approach <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g driver fitness. Thismeans that, when mak<strong>in</strong>g driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations, OSMV assessesthe effect(s) that a medical condition has on the functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g.17


Functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>gThe functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g are cognitive, sensory (vision) andmo<strong>to</strong>r (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sensorimo<strong>to</strong>r) 2 .Each of these functions is described below. Although the functionsnecessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g are described <strong>in</strong>dividually, driv<strong>in</strong>g is a complexperceptual-mo<strong>to</strong>r skill which usually takes place <strong>in</strong> a complexenvironment and which requires the functions <strong>to</strong> operate <strong>to</strong>gether.Cognitive functionsThe cognitive functions that are the most relevant <strong>to</strong> the driv<strong>in</strong>g task are:Attention (divided, selective, susta<strong>in</strong>ed)Divided attentionthe ability <strong>to</strong> attend <strong>to</strong> two or more stimuli at the same time.Example: attend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the roadway ahead while be<strong>in</strong>g able <strong>to</strong> identifystimuli <strong>in</strong> the peripherySelective attentionthe ability <strong>to</strong> selectively attend <strong>to</strong> one or more important stimuli whileignor<strong>in</strong>g compet<strong>in</strong>g distractionsExample: the ability <strong>to</strong> isolate the traffic light from among otherenvironmental stimuliSusta<strong>in</strong>ed attentionalso referred <strong>to</strong> as vigilance. It is def<strong>in</strong>ed as the capacity <strong>to</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> anattentional activity over a period of timeExample: the ability <strong>to</strong> attend <strong>to</strong> the roadway ahead over an extendedperiod of time.Short-term or passive memoryrefers <strong>to</strong> the temporary s<strong>to</strong>rage of <strong>in</strong>formation or the brief retention of<strong>in</strong>formation that is currently be<strong>in</strong>g processed <strong>in</strong> a person's m<strong>in</strong>d2 The organizational framework for the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g used <strong>in</strong> this manual are taken from Dr.Bonnie Dobbs’ chapter on Function and Driv<strong>in</strong>g from her <strong>2010</strong> Medical Conditions and Driv<strong>in</strong>g research document.18


Example: the temporary s<strong>to</strong>rage of <strong>in</strong>formation related <strong>to</strong> roadway sign<strong>in</strong>formation such as that related <strong>to</strong> freeway exits or construction areas;signs related <strong>to</strong> caution ahead, etc.Work<strong>in</strong>g memory (the active component of short-term memory)refers <strong>to</strong> the ability <strong>to</strong> manipulate <strong>in</strong>formation with timeconstra<strong>in</strong>ts/tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> and updat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formationExample: environmental <strong>in</strong>formation related <strong>to</strong> the driv<strong>in</strong>g task on a busyfreeway.Long-term memoryrefers <strong>to</strong> memory for personal events (au<strong>to</strong>biographical memory) andgeneral world knowledge (semantic memory). Long-term memorydiffers from short-term memory <strong>in</strong> a number of areas:o capacity – long-term memory has an unlimited capacitycompared <strong>to</strong> the limited capacity of short-term memory:o duration – <strong>in</strong>formation s<strong>to</strong>red <strong>in</strong> long-term memory is relativelystable for an <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite period of time. Information <strong>in</strong> shorttermmemory, on the other hand, is very fleet<strong>in</strong>g.Example: know<strong>in</strong>g your way from home <strong>to</strong> the grocery s<strong>to</strong>re; the mean<strong>in</strong>gof traffic signs; and know<strong>in</strong>g the rules of the road.Choice/complex reaction timerefers <strong>to</strong> the time taken <strong>to</strong> respond differentially <strong>to</strong> two or more stimulior events. The time taken <strong>to</strong> respond and the appropriateness of theresponse are important with<strong>in</strong> the driv<strong>in</strong>g contextExample: respond<strong>in</strong>g when a cat darts on<strong>to</strong> the edge of the road at thesame time a pedestrian steps on<strong>to</strong> the roadway.Track<strong>in</strong>gdef<strong>in</strong>ed as the ability <strong>to</strong> visually follow a stimulus that is mov<strong>in</strong>g orsequentially appear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> different locationsExample: the ability <strong>to</strong> visually follow other cars on the road.Visuospatial abilitiesis a general category that refers <strong>to</strong> processes dependent on vision suchas the recognition of objects, the ability <strong>to</strong> mentally rotate objects,determ<strong>in</strong>ations of relationships between stimuli based on size or color.Example: understand<strong>in</strong>g where a tree and other objects are <strong>in</strong> relation <strong>to</strong>the car.Executive function<strong>in</strong>g (see also central executive function<strong>in</strong>g below)19


efers <strong>to</strong> those capabilities that enable an <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>to</strong> successfullyengage <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent, purposeful, and self-serv<strong>in</strong>g behaviours.Disturbances <strong>in</strong> executive function<strong>in</strong>g are characterized by disturbedattention, <strong>in</strong>creased distractibility, deficits <strong>in</strong> self-awareness, andpreservative behaviour.Central executive function<strong>in</strong>g (see also executive function<strong>in</strong>g above)refers <strong>to</strong> that part of work<strong>in</strong>g memory that is responsible for‘supervis<strong>in</strong>g’ many cognitive processes <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g encod<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>in</strong>putt<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>formation from the external world), s<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> memory,and retriev<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation from memory.central executive (CE) function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cludes abilities such as plann<strong>in</strong>gand organization, reason<strong>in</strong>g and problem solv<strong>in</strong>g, conceptual thought,and decision mak<strong>in</strong>g. CE function<strong>in</strong>g is critical for the successfulcompletion of tasks that <strong>in</strong>volve plann<strong>in</strong>g or decision mak<strong>in</strong>g and thatare complex <strong>in</strong> natureExample: mak<strong>in</strong>g a left turn at an uncontrolled <strong>in</strong>tersection.Visual <strong>in</strong>formation process<strong>in</strong>gdef<strong>in</strong>ed as the process<strong>in</strong>g of visual <strong>in</strong>formation beyond the perceptuallevel (e.g., recogniz<strong>in</strong>g and identify<strong>in</strong>g objects and decision mak<strong>in</strong>grelated <strong>to</strong> those objects).visual <strong>in</strong>formation process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volves higher order cognitiveprocess<strong>in</strong>g. However, because of the visual component, references <strong>to</strong>visual <strong>in</strong>formation process<strong>in</strong>g often are <strong>in</strong>cluded with<strong>in</strong> the visualdoma<strong>in</strong>.Research <strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>in</strong>dividuals with progressive or irreversibledecl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> cognitive function cannot compensate for their cognitiveimpairment.20


Mo<strong>to</strong>r functions (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sensorimo<strong>to</strong>r)Mo<strong>to</strong>r functions <strong>in</strong>clude:Coord<strong>in</strong>ationthe ability <strong>to</strong> execute smooth, accurate, controlled movementsExample: execut<strong>in</strong>g a left hand turn; shift<strong>in</strong>g gears, etc.Dexterityread<strong>in</strong>ess and grace <strong>in</strong> physical activity; especially skill and ease <strong>in</strong>us<strong>in</strong>g the handsExample: <strong>in</strong>sert<strong>in</strong>g keys <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the ignition; operat<strong>in</strong>g vehicle controls, etc.Gross mo<strong>to</strong>r abilitiesgross range of motion and strength of the upper and lower extremities,grip strength, proprioception, and f<strong>in</strong>e and gross mo<strong>to</strong>r coord<strong>in</strong>ation.Range of motiondef<strong>in</strong>ed as the degree of movement a jo<strong>in</strong>t has when it is extended,flexed, and rotated through all of its possible movements. Range ofmotion of the extremities (e.g., ankle extension and flexion are needed<strong>to</strong> reach the gas pedal and brake) and upper body range of motion (e.g.,shoulder and elbow flexion are necessary for turn<strong>in</strong>g the steer<strong>in</strong>gwheel; elbow flexion is needed <strong>to</strong> turn the steer<strong>in</strong>g wheel; range ofmotion of the head and neck are necessary for look<strong>in</strong>g at the side andrear for vehicles and for identify<strong>in</strong>g obstacles at the side of the road orcars approach<strong>in</strong>g from a side street).Strengththe amount of strength a muscle can produceExample: lower<strong>in</strong>g the brake pedal.for many functions, muscle strength and flexibility often go hand <strong>in</strong>handExample: gett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> and out of the car; operat<strong>in</strong>g vehicle controls,fasten<strong>in</strong>g the seat belt, etc.Flexibilitythe ability <strong>to</strong> move jo<strong>in</strong>ts and muscles through their full range ofmotion (see examples above).Reaction timethe amount of time taken <strong>to</strong> respond <strong>to</strong> a stimulus21


Example: depress<strong>in</strong>g the brake pedal <strong>in</strong> response <strong>to</strong> a child runn<strong>in</strong>g ou<strong>to</strong>n the roadway, swerv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> avoid an animal on the road, etc.Research on mo<strong>to</strong>r functions and driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates considerable variability<strong>in</strong> the association between the different mo<strong>to</strong>r functions and driv<strong>in</strong>goutcomes. Overall, the research suggests that a significant level ofimpairment <strong>in</strong> mo<strong>to</strong>r functions is needed before driv<strong>in</strong>g performance isaffected <strong>to</strong> an unsafe level.Sensorimo<strong>to</strong>rfor purposes of the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program, sensorimo<strong>to</strong>r functions areconsidered as a subset of mo<strong>to</strong>r functions.sensorimo<strong>to</strong>r function is a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of sensory and mo<strong>to</strong>rfunction<strong>in</strong>g for accomplish<strong>in</strong>g a task.sensorimo<strong>to</strong>r functions are, for the most part, reflexive or au<strong>to</strong>matice.g., the response <strong>to</strong> your hand be<strong>in</strong>g placed on a hot s<strong>to</strong>ve; ability <strong>to</strong>sit upright, etc.vestibular disorders and peripheral vascular diseases commonly result<strong>in</strong> sensorimo<strong>to</strong>r impairments.Sensory functions (Vision)Visual functions important for driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clude:Acuitythe spatial resolv<strong>in</strong>g ability of the visual system, e.g., the smallest sizedetail that a person can see.visual acuity typically is assessed by hav<strong>in</strong>g the person read a letterchart such as the Snellen chart, where the first l<strong>in</strong>e consists of one verylarge letter, with subsequent rows hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g numbers of lettersthat decrease <strong>in</strong> size.Visual fieldrefers <strong>to</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s entire spatial area of vision when fixation isstable, e.g., the extent of the area that an <strong>in</strong>dividual can see with theireyes held <strong>in</strong> a fixated position.Contrast sensitivitythe amount of contrast an <strong>in</strong>dividual needs <strong>to</strong> identify or detect anobject or pattern, e.g., the ability detect a gray object on a whitebackground or <strong>to</strong> see a white object on a light gray background.22


an <strong>in</strong>dividual with poor contrast sensitivity may have difficulty see<strong>in</strong>gtraffic lights or cars at night. Conditions such as cataracts and diabeticret<strong>in</strong>opathy affect contrast sensitivity.Disability glarethe degradation of visual performance caused by a reduction ofcontrast. It can occur directly, by reduc<strong>in</strong>g the contrast between anobject and its background, i.e. directly affect<strong>in</strong>g the visual task, or<strong>in</strong>directly by affect<strong>in</strong>g the eye.Examples: the reflection of the sun from a car dashboard, and the viewthrough a misted up w<strong>in</strong>dscreen.Perceptionrefers <strong>to</strong> the process of acquir<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g, select<strong>in</strong>g, andorganiz<strong>in</strong>g sensory <strong>in</strong>formation.Results from studies <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g the relationship between visual abilitiesand driv<strong>in</strong>g performance are, for the most part, equivocal. It may be, assuggested for mo<strong>to</strong>r abilities, that a significant level of visual impairmentis needed before driv<strong>in</strong>g performance is affected.3.4 Individual assessment<strong>Drive</strong>r fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations will be based on <strong>in</strong>dividual characteristicsand abilities rather than presumed group characteristics and abilities.In the Grismer case, the Supreme Court of Canada held that each drivermust be assessed accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the driver’s own personal abilities ratherthan presumed group characteristics. The case orig<strong>in</strong>ated from acompla<strong>in</strong>t <strong>to</strong> the <strong>BC</strong> Council of Human Rights regard<strong>in</strong>g OSMV’scancellation of a driver’s licence. OSMV had cancelled the licencebecause the driver’s vision did not meet the m<strong>in</strong>imum standard established<strong>in</strong> the <strong>Guide</strong>. The Grismer decision is applicable <strong>to</strong> driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ations for <strong>in</strong>dividuals with persistent impairments. The courtshave not yet considered the issue of <strong>in</strong>dividual assessments for driverswith episodic impairments.The discrim<strong>in</strong>ation found <strong>in</strong> the Grismer case was not because OSMVcancelled a licence but because the driver did not have the opportunity <strong>to</strong>prove through an <strong>in</strong>dividual assessment that he could be licensed withoutunreasonably jeopardiz<strong>in</strong>g road safety. The court held that OSMV madean error when it adopted an absolute standard which was not supported byevidence.23


Deliver<strong>in</strong>g the judgement of the Court, McLachl<strong>in</strong> J. wrote that:“Driv<strong>in</strong>g au<strong>to</strong>mobiles is a privilege most adult Canadians take forgranted. It is important <strong>to</strong> their lives and work. While the privilege canbe removed because of risk, it must not be removed on the basis ofdiscrim<strong>in</strong>a<strong>to</strong>ry assumptions founded on stereotypes of disability, ratherthan actual capacity <strong>to</strong> drive safely. … This case is not about whetherunsafe drivers must be allowed <strong>to</strong> drive. There is no suggestion that avisually impaired driver should be licensed unless she or he cancompensate for the impairment and drive safely. Rather, this case isabout whether, on the evidence … [the driver] should have been givena chance <strong>to</strong> prove through an <strong>in</strong>dividual assessment that he coulddrive.”The medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the medical conditionchapters of this Manual are based on presumed group characteristics of<strong>in</strong>dividuals with each medical condition. However, consistent with thedecision <strong>in</strong> Grismer, OSMV makes driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations on an<strong>in</strong>dividual basis. This is why the medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es are calledguidel<strong>in</strong>es; they are a start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t for decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g, but may notapply <strong>to</strong> every <strong>in</strong>dividual. Where appropriate, OSMV utilizes <strong>in</strong>dividualassessments <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e whether an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s functional ability <strong>to</strong>drive is impaired and, if so, whether the <strong>in</strong>dividual can compensate for theimpairment.24


3.5 Best <strong>in</strong>formation<strong>Drive</strong>r fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations will be based on the best <strong>in</strong>formation that isavailable.For each <strong>in</strong>dividual, OSMV gathers the best <strong>in</strong>formation that is availableand required <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e fitness. Depend<strong>in</strong>g upon the nature of thefunctional impairment, the best <strong>in</strong>formation may <strong>in</strong>clude results ofspecialized functional assessments that clearly <strong>in</strong>dicate whether or not an<strong>in</strong>dividual is fit <strong>to</strong> drive, such as a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment that measuresimpairment of cognitive ability as it relates <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g. For other<strong>in</strong>dividuals and impairments there may be no scientifically validatedassessment <strong>to</strong>ols available that can accurately measure the impact of amedical condition on the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g. In the case of<strong>in</strong>dividuals with episodic impairments, OSMV has <strong>to</strong> rely on the results ofmedical assessments as the best <strong>in</strong>formation available for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gfitness <strong>to</strong> drive.25


PART 2:POLICIES ANDPROCEDURES26


Chapter 4: Introduction <strong>to</strong> the Policies and Procedures4.1 OverviewThe flowcharts on the follow<strong>in</strong>g two pages highlight the four key activitiesof the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program: Screen<strong>in</strong>g, Assessment, Determ<strong>in</strong>ation andReconsideration.Screen<strong>in</strong>g identifies <strong>in</strong>dividuals who have a known or possible medicalcondition that may impair their functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive, commercialdrivers and ag<strong>in</strong>g drivers. Screen<strong>in</strong>g policies are documented <strong>in</strong> Chapter 5of this Manual.Assessment is the process of collect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation required <strong>to</strong> make adriver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation. The key assessment used for driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ations is a driver’s medical exam<strong>in</strong>ation completed by an<strong>in</strong>dividual’s general practitioner and documented on the <strong>Drive</strong>r MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation Report (DMER). A variety of other assessments may also berequired, such as specialist exam<strong>in</strong>ations or road tests. Assessmentpolicies and procedures are documented <strong>in</strong> Chapter 6 of this Manual.Determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong>volves review<strong>in</strong>g:the <strong>in</strong>formation obta<strong>in</strong>ed from assessmentsany other relevant file <strong>in</strong>formation, such as driv<strong>in</strong>g his<strong>to</strong>ry, andthe medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Part 3 of this Manualand determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whether an <strong>in</strong>dividual is fit <strong>to</strong> drive. Policies andprocedures that govern the determ<strong>in</strong>ation process are outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 7of this Manual.Reconsideration is the process of review<strong>in</strong>g a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ationupon request of an <strong>in</strong>dividual who was found not fit <strong>to</strong> drive, or who hadrestrictions or conditions imposed. Policies and procedures that governthe reconsideration process are outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 8 of this Manual.27


1. SCREENINGA driver disclosesa medicalcondition <strong>to</strong> IC<strong>BC</strong>,or fails visionscreen<strong>in</strong>g, atlicence applicationor renewalTheOSMVreceivesacrediblereportTheOSMVreceivesa reportpursuant<strong>to</strong> MVAs. 230A scheduledreassessment<strong>in</strong>tervalexpiresA driver turns80 or a rout<strong>in</strong>eage relatedscreen<strong>in</strong>g isdueA driver appliesfor acommercialclass licence ora rout<strong>in</strong>ecommercialscreen<strong>in</strong>g is dueA DMER is mailed <strong>to</strong> the driver2. ASSESSMENT (subject <strong>to</strong> revision)A physician conducts a driver’s medical exam<strong>in</strong>ation,documents the results on the DMER and sends the DMER <strong>to</strong>the OSMVAn <strong>in</strong>take agent reviews the DMER and any other relevant<strong>in</strong>formation and decides whether a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ationis requiredIs a determ<strong>in</strong>ationrequired?NoYesIs a reassessmentInterval required?NoEnd of processYesThe <strong>in</strong>take agent schedules areassessmentAn adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case manager reviews the DMER and anyother relevant <strong>in</strong>formation and decides whether further<strong>in</strong>formation is required <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> make a determ<strong>in</strong>ationIs further <strong>in</strong>formationrequired?NoTo3. Determ<strong>in</strong>ationYesThe adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or casemanager requestsmedical and/orfunctional assessments28


3. DETERMINATIONFrom2. AssessmentAn adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case manager reviews the DMER and anyother assessment results, driv<strong>in</strong>g record, other <strong>in</strong>formation onfile and medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es and determ<strong>in</strong>es whetherdriver is fit <strong>to</strong> driveIs the driver fit <strong>to</strong> drive?NoYesIs a reassessmentInterval required?The adjudica<strong>to</strong>r orcase manager sendsthe driver a lettercommunicat<strong>in</strong>g thedeterm<strong>in</strong>ationYesNoThe adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case managerschedules a reassessmentAre conditions orrestrictions required?YesNoEnd of process4. RECONSIDERATIONNoDoes the driver ask for areview of the decision?YesAn adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case manager reconsiders the decisionand may request additional assessments. At theconclusion of the reconsideration, the adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or casemanager sends the <strong>in</strong>dividual a letter either confirm<strong>in</strong>g theorig<strong>in</strong>al determ<strong>in</strong>ation or substitut<strong>in</strong>g a new determ<strong>in</strong>ationEnd of process29


Chapter 5:Screen<strong>in</strong>g Policies5.1 OverviewThe follow<strong>in</strong>g flowchart is an excerpt from the overview flowchartpresented <strong>in</strong> 4.1 that highlights <strong>in</strong> red the steps <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g.A driver disclosesa medicalcondition <strong>to</strong> IC<strong>BC</strong>,or fails visionscreen<strong>in</strong>g, atlicence applicationor renewalTheOSMVreceivesacrediblereportTheOSMVreceivesa reportpursuant<strong>to</strong> MVAs. 230A scheduledreassessment<strong>in</strong>tervalexpiresA driver turns80 or a rout<strong>in</strong>eage relatedscreen<strong>in</strong>g isdueA driver appliesfor acommercialclass licence ora rout<strong>in</strong>ecommercialscreen<strong>in</strong>g is dueA DMER is mailed <strong>to</strong> the driverTo2. AssessmentScreen<strong>in</strong>g identifies <strong>in</strong>dividuals with a known or possible medicalcondition that may impair the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, commercialdrivers and ag<strong>in</strong>g drivers. Screen<strong>in</strong>g occurs when:an <strong>in</strong>dividual applies for a British Columbia driver’s licence, renewalof a licence, or a licence class upgrade and discloses a medicalcondition that may impair the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>ga medical practitioner, op<strong>to</strong>metrist or psychologist reports a driver <strong>to</strong>OSMV pursuant <strong>to</strong> MVA s. 230police, health care practitioners or other <strong>in</strong>dividuals submit a crediblereport <strong>to</strong> OSMVan <strong>in</strong>dividual attends for a follow-up medical assessment for apreviously identified medical condition that may impair the functionsnecessary for driv<strong>in</strong>gan <strong>in</strong>dividual first applies for a commercial class driver’s licence andat scheduled <strong>in</strong>tervals pursuant <strong>to</strong> the CCMTA Medical Standards for<strong>Drive</strong>rs if an <strong>in</strong>dividual holds a commercial class driver’s licence, anda driver reaches the age of 80 and every two years thereafter.30


Once identified, a DMER is mailed <strong>to</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual with <strong>in</strong>structions <strong>to</strong>take the DMER <strong>to</strong> their physician for a driver’s medical exam<strong>in</strong>ation. TheDMER may be <strong>in</strong>itiated:by staff at an IC<strong>BC</strong> Po<strong>in</strong>t of Serviceby OSMV staff upon receipt of a credible report or report pursuant <strong>to</strong>MVA s.230, orau<strong>to</strong>matically by OSMV system <strong>in</strong> the case of commercial drivers,ag<strong>in</strong>g drivers and other drivers who have scheduled re-assessment<strong>in</strong>tervals.5.2 Screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividuals with known or possible medicalconditionsDef<strong>in</strong>itionsCredible reportmeans an unsolicited report from:a health care professionalthe policeIC<strong>BC</strong> front-l<strong>in</strong>e staffa government agenta family member, ora concerned member of the publicthat provides objective <strong>in</strong>formation about a driver’s functional ability <strong>to</strong>drive.Medical conditionis any <strong>in</strong>jury, illness, disease or disorder that is identified <strong>in</strong> Part 3 of thisManual or that may impair the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g. Forpurposes of the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program, impairment result<strong>in</strong>g frommedications and/or treatment regimes that have been prescribed astreatment for a medical condition is also considered a medical condition.General debility and a lack of stam<strong>in</strong>a are also considered as medicalconditions that may impair the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g.31


Policy5.2.1 The <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program screens <strong>in</strong>dividuals whose functionalability <strong>to</strong> drive may be impaired by a known or possible medicalcondition.5.2.2 An <strong>in</strong>dividual with a known medical condition that may impair thefunctions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g will be screened when:(a) a physician or other health care professional reports <strong>to</strong> OSMVthat the <strong>in</strong>dividual has a medical condition that may impair thefunctions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g(b) the <strong>in</strong>dividual discloses a medical condition that may impairthe functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g when they apply for, orrenew, their driver’s licence, or(c) an OSMV-scheduled re-assessment <strong>in</strong>terval for an <strong>in</strong>dividualwith a previously reported medical condition expires.5.2.3 An <strong>in</strong>dividual with a possible medical condition that may impairthe functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g will be screened when OSMVreceives a credible report that documents a concern regard<strong>in</strong>g the<strong>in</strong>dividual’s functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive.Policy rationaleSections 25 and 29 of the MVA authorize the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent <strong>to</strong> exam<strong>in</strong>ean <strong>in</strong>dividual’s fitness and ability <strong>to</strong> drive. While OSMV operates otherprograms that are concerned with fitness and ability <strong>to</strong> drive, such as its<strong>Drive</strong>r Improvement Program, the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program is specificallyconcerned with <strong>in</strong>dividuals whose fitness and ability <strong>to</strong> drive may beimpaired by medical conditions. This <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>in</strong>dividuals who may beimpaired by medications or treatment regimes prescribed as treatment for amedical condition, general debility or a lack of stam<strong>in</strong>a.To ensure that <strong>in</strong>dividuals are not screened unnecessarily, the <strong>Drive</strong>r<strong>Fitness</strong> Program only screens private drivers under the age of 80 wherethere is evidence that the <strong>in</strong>dividual has a medical condition that mayimpair the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g.32


5.3 Screen<strong>in</strong>g ag<strong>in</strong>g driversDef<strong>in</strong>itionsPrivate drivermeans a driver with a class 5, 6, 7 or 8 licence.Policy5.3.1 The <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program rout<strong>in</strong>ely screens private drivers everytwo years start<strong>in</strong>g at the age of 80.Policy rationaleBecause of the <strong>in</strong>creased risk of medical conditions and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>goutcomes associated with ag<strong>in</strong>g drivers, drivers over the age of 80 arerout<strong>in</strong>ely screened every two years, even if there is no evidence of aknown or possible medical condition. A detailed description of theresearch <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>creased risk associated with ag<strong>in</strong>g drivers is<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Appendix 3.5.4 Screen<strong>in</strong>g commercial driversDef<strong>in</strong>itionsCommercial drivermeans a driver with: a class 1, 2, 3 or 4 licence, or a class 5 licence with endorsement 18, 19 or 20.33


Policy5.4.1 The <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program rout<strong>in</strong>ely screens commercial driversat the time of licence application and then at the follow<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>tervals:(a) up <strong>to</strong> age 45, every 5 years(b) from age 45 <strong>to</strong> age 65, every 3 years, and(c) from age 65, annually.Policy rationaleCommercial drivers drive a variety of vehicles <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g large trucks andpassenger carry<strong>in</strong>g vehicles such as buses. A list of licence classes is<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Appendix 4. Professional drivers who operate passengercarry<strong>in</strong>g vehicles, trucks and emergency vehicles spend many more hoursat the wheel, often under far more adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g conditions, than do thedrivers of private vehicles. They are usually unable <strong>to</strong> select their hours ofwork and cannot readily abandon their passengers or cargo should theybecome unwell when on duty. Persons operat<strong>in</strong>g emergency vehicles arefrequently required <strong>to</strong> drive while under considerable stress by the natureof their work, and often <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>clement weather where driv<strong>in</strong>g conditions areless than ideal. Should a crash occur, the consequences are much morelikely <strong>to</strong> be serious, particularly where the driver is carry<strong>in</strong>g passengers ordangerous cargo such as propane, chlor<strong>in</strong>e gas, <strong>to</strong>xic chemicals orradioactive substances.Because of this greater exposure, commercial drivers are rout<strong>in</strong>elyscreened at regular <strong>in</strong>tervals, even if there is no evidence that the driverhas a known or possible medical condition. To ensure consistency withother prov<strong>in</strong>ces, <strong>BC</strong> has adopted the CCMTA Medical Standards for<strong>Drive</strong>rs guidel<strong>in</strong>es for screen<strong>in</strong>g commercial drivers.34


5.5 Transient impairmentsDef<strong>in</strong>itionsTransient impairmentmeans a temporary impairment of the functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive wherethere is little or no likelihood of a recurr<strong>in</strong>g episodic, or ongo<strong>in</strong>gpersistent, impairment. Examples of transient impairments are:the after-effects of surgery, e.g. the time <strong>to</strong> recover from theanaesthetic and the surgery itselfPolicyfractures and casts, post-orthopedic surgeryconcussioneye surgery, e.g. cataract surgeryuse of orthopaedic braces (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g neck), andcardiac <strong>in</strong>flammation and <strong>in</strong>fections.5.5.1 The <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program does not screen <strong>in</strong>dividuals withtransient impairments.Policy rationaleOSMV does not need <strong>to</strong> know when a driver has experienced a transientimpairment. In these cases, a doc<strong>to</strong>r may rely on best practices <strong>to</strong> tell apatient, for example, “don’t drive for 6 weeks after your abdom<strong>in</strong>alsurgery.” The Canadian Medical Association (CMA) <strong>Guide</strong> forPhysicians when Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>Fitness</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Drive</strong> (2007) conta<strong>in</strong>s guidel<strong>in</strong>esfor physicians for many transient impairments associated with a range ofmedical conditions.5.6 Cancell<strong>in</strong>g or restrict<strong>in</strong>g a licence because of an immediatepublic safety riskPolicy5.6.1 If the <strong>in</strong>formation obta<strong>in</strong>ed dur<strong>in</strong>g screen<strong>in</strong>g reveals an immediaterisk <strong>to</strong> public safety, OSMV may direct IC<strong>BC</strong> <strong>to</strong> cancel or restrict alicence without further assessment.35


Policy rationaleIn most cases, OSMV will not direct IC<strong>BC</strong> <strong>to</strong> restrict or cancel a licencebased only on the <strong>in</strong>formation obta<strong>in</strong>ed dur<strong>in</strong>g screen<strong>in</strong>g. However, thereare times when cancellation or restriction may be warranted based on theresults of screen<strong>in</strong>g. For example, a credible report may <strong>in</strong>dicate that an<strong>in</strong>dividual’s functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive is severely impaired. OSMV woulddirect IC<strong>BC</strong> <strong>to</strong> cancel the driver’s licence for public safety reasons andwould review the decision once further <strong>in</strong>formation was received.36


Chapter 6: Assessment Policies and Procedures6.1 OverviewThe flowchart below is an excerpt from the overview flowchart presented<strong>in</strong> 4.1 that highlights <strong>in</strong> red the steps that take place dur<strong>in</strong>g assessment.From 1. Screen<strong>in</strong>gA physician conducts a driver’s medical exam<strong>in</strong>ation,documents the results on the DMER and sends the DMER <strong>to</strong>the OSMVAn <strong>in</strong>take agent reviews the DMER and any other relevant<strong>in</strong>formation and decides whether a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ationis requiredIs a determ<strong>in</strong>ationrequired?NoYesIs a reassessmentInterval required?NoEnd of processYesThe <strong>in</strong>take agent schedules areassessmentAn adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case manager reviews the DMER and anyother relevant <strong>in</strong>formation and decides whether further<strong>in</strong>formation is required <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> make a determ<strong>in</strong>ationIs further <strong>in</strong>formationrequired?YesThe adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or casemanager requestsmedical and/orfunctional assessmentsNoTo3. Determ<strong>in</strong>ation37


Dur<strong>in</strong>g assessment, OSMV collects the <strong>in</strong>formation required <strong>to</strong> make adriver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation. As the first step <strong>in</strong> the assessment process, an<strong>in</strong>take agent reviews the DMER and decides whether the case should beforwarded <strong>to</strong> a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r for a determ<strong>in</strong>ation.Particularly <strong>in</strong> the case of commercial or ag<strong>in</strong>g drivers, the DMER may<strong>in</strong>dicate that an <strong>in</strong>dividual either does not have a medical condition thatimpairs the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, or clearly meets the medicalcondition guidel<strong>in</strong>es. In these cases, further assessment and a driverfitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation are not required, although a re-assessment may bescheduled. Policies and procedures that guide <strong>in</strong>take agents <strong>in</strong> perform<strong>in</strong>gthese tasks are documented <strong>in</strong> the Intake Agent <strong>Guide</strong>l<strong>in</strong>es for Assess<strong>in</strong>g<strong>Fitness</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Drive</strong> and are not duplicated here.If a determ<strong>in</strong>ation is required, an adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case manager reviews theapplicable medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es, the DMER and the results of anyassessments on file and decides whether any further <strong>in</strong>formation isrequired <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> make a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation. In many cases,the <strong>in</strong>formation from a DMER, read <strong>in</strong> conjunction with the medicalcondition guidel<strong>in</strong>es applicable <strong>to</strong> that particular medical condition, willeasily allow a determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>to</strong> be made. In other cases, more <strong>in</strong>formationwill be required. Although presented <strong>in</strong> the flowchart as a l<strong>in</strong>ear process,this means that assessment and determ<strong>in</strong>ation may overlap.To collect additional <strong>in</strong>formation, the adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case manager requestsfurther medical and/or functional assessments. The policies outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>this chapter, and the guidel<strong>in</strong>es regard<strong>in</strong>g use of assessments <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong>each medical condition chapter <strong>in</strong> Part 3 of this Manual, assist casemanagers and adjudica<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the appropriate assessments <strong>to</strong>request for each <strong>in</strong>dividual. OSMV policy on pay<strong>in</strong>g for assessments isconta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Assessment Payment Policy Manual.38


6.2 Assessments will only be requested if necessary <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>efitnessPolicy6.2.1 A case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will only request assessments thatare necessary <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e driver fitness. If the <strong>in</strong>formationavailable from the DMER, and any other relevant materials on file,is sufficient for a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e whetheror not a driver is fit, no further assessments will be requested.6.2.2 If, after review<strong>in</strong>g the relevant medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es, a casemanager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r decides that further <strong>in</strong>formation is required<strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> make a determ<strong>in</strong>ation, the case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>rwill request further assessments.6.2.3 If an <strong>in</strong>dividual clearly does not meet the medical conditionguidel<strong>in</strong>es for one or more of the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s identified medicalconditions, a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will not request furtherassessments.Policy rationaleSections 25 and 29 of the MVA give the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent the authority <strong>to</strong>request vision tests, medical exam<strong>in</strong>ations and other exam<strong>in</strong>ations andtests <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s fitness <strong>to</strong> drive. In order <strong>to</strong> savetime and costs, and lessen the <strong>in</strong>convenience, <strong>to</strong> drivers, physicians andOSMV, OSMV will only request an assessment if it is necessary <strong>to</strong>determ<strong>in</strong>e driver fitness.6.3 Request<strong>in</strong>g medical assessmentsDef<strong>in</strong>itionsMedical assessmentis any k<strong>in</strong>d of assessment that provides <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an<strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition and/or their response <strong>to</strong>, or compliancewith, treatment. This <strong>in</strong>cludes assessments such as ultrasounds, bloodtests and other medical tests that are not requested by OSMV, but are oftensubmitted by physicians and provide useful <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an<strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition.39


Policy6.3.1 If a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r decides that further <strong>in</strong>formationregard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition(s) or the <strong>in</strong>dividual’sresponse <strong>to</strong>, or compliance with, treatment, is necessary <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong>make a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation, the case manager oradjudica<strong>to</strong>r will request a medical assessment.6.3.2 If a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r decides <strong>to</strong> request a medicalassessment, the case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will review theguidel<strong>in</strong>es regard<strong>in</strong>g the use of assessments outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the relevantmedical condition chapter(s), and the policies outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> thischapter, and decide which medical assessment(s) <strong>to</strong> request. Thefollow<strong>in</strong>g table lists the medical assessments that the case manageror adjudica<strong>to</strong>r may request.Medical assessments<strong>Drive</strong>r’s medical exam<strong>in</strong>ation (documented on the DMER)Diabetic driver medical exam<strong>in</strong>ation (documented on theDoc<strong>to</strong>r’s Report on Commercial <strong>Drive</strong>r with Diabetes onInsul<strong>in</strong>) (See guidel<strong>in</strong>es for request<strong>in</strong>g assessments of diabeticdrivers <strong>in</strong> Chapter 11)Specialist assessments completed by a psychologist, addictionsspecialist or other medical doc<strong>to</strong>r. (See 6.4 for policies onrequest<strong>in</strong>g specialist assessments)Policy rationaleTo ensure that OSMV bases its driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations on completeand accurate medical <strong>in</strong>formation, case managers and adjudica<strong>to</strong>rs requestadditional medical assessments whenever further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an<strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition, or the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s response <strong>to</strong>, orcompliance with, treatment is required.40


6.4 Request<strong>in</strong>g specialist assessmentsPolicy6.4.1 A case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will contact the physician whosubmitted the DMER if further <strong>in</strong>formation on an <strong>in</strong>dividual’smedical condition, or the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s response <strong>to</strong>, or compliancewith, treatment is required that may require a specialist assessment.6.4.2 If the physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that:(a) the <strong>in</strong>formation can only be provided by a specialist(b) there is no specialist assessment on the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s file, and(c) a specialist assessment is not medically necessarythe case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will request a specialistassessment.6.4.3 The case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will clearly articulate the scope ofthe required specialist assessment <strong>in</strong> the request.6.4.4 The case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will review the policies outl<strong>in</strong>ed<strong>in</strong> the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Assessment Payment Policy Manual <strong>to</strong>determ<strong>in</strong>e the appropriate payment for a specialist assessment.Policy rationaleSpecialist assessments are assessments performed by physicians with aspecialization <strong>in</strong> a particular area of medic<strong>in</strong>e or medical condition. Many<strong>in</strong>dividuals are assessed by specialists dur<strong>in</strong>g the course of the diagnosisand treatment of a medical condition and OSMV may request and obta<strong>in</strong>copies of those assessments from the physician who submitted the DMER.However, <strong>in</strong> some cases, a specialist assessment will not be medicallynecessary, but will provide further <strong>in</strong>formation that is required <strong>in</strong> order fora case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> make a determ<strong>in</strong>ation of driver fitness.Because OSMV should not pay for specialist assessments that aremedically necessary, a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will only request aspecialist assessment if the physician who completed the <strong>in</strong>itial driver’smedical exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong>dicates that a specialist assessment is not necessaryfor medical purposes, even though it is necessary for purposes of a driverfitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation.41


6.5 Request<strong>in</strong>g functional assessmentsDef<strong>in</strong>itionsEpisodic impairmentis the result of a medical condition that does not have any ongo<strong>in</strong>gmeasurable, testable or observable impact on the functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g but that may result <strong>in</strong> an unpredictable sudden or episodicimpairment. Episodic impairments generally result <strong>in</strong> sudden<strong>in</strong>capacitation.For example, the medical condition that gives rise <strong>to</strong> the impairment maybe testable, e.g. the size of an abdom<strong>in</strong>al aortic aneurysm, or known, e.g.epilepsy, but the precipitat<strong>in</strong>g event that negatively impacts the functionalability <strong>to</strong> drive, e.g. the rupture of the aneurysm or an epileptic seizure, isnot predictable. The source of the potential impairment is known and the<strong>in</strong>evitability of functional impairment is known <strong>in</strong> the event that theepisodic impairment occurs, but when it will occur is not known.Functional assessmentis any k<strong>in</strong>d of assessment that <strong>in</strong>volves direct observation or measuremen<strong>to</strong>f the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g. Functional assessments <strong>in</strong>clude:paper-pencil testscomputer-based testseye testshear<strong>in</strong>g testsdriver rehabilitation specialist assessments, androad tests.Persistent impairmentis an ongo<strong>in</strong>g or cont<strong>in</strong>uous impairment <strong>to</strong> a function necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g. The potential impacts of persistent impairments on the functionsnecessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g are generally measurable, testable and observable.Although the condition may be progressive, the progression is usuallyslow and sudden deterioration is unlikely. Persistent impairments may bestable, e.g. loss of leg, or progressive, e.g. arthritis.42


Policy6.5.1 If a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r decides that further <strong>in</strong>formation onan <strong>in</strong>dividual’s functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive is necessary <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong>make a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation, the case manager oradjudica<strong>to</strong>r will request a functional assessment.6.5.2 If a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r decides <strong>to</strong> request a functionalassessment, the case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will review theguidel<strong>in</strong>es regard<strong>in</strong>g the use of assessments outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the relevantmedical condition chapter(s), and the policies outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> thischapter, and decide which functional assessment <strong>to</strong> request. Thefollow<strong>in</strong>g table lists the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g and thefunctional assessments that a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r mayrequest that can observe or measure that function.Driv<strong>in</strong>g functionCognitive(See 6.6 for policies onrequest<strong>in</strong>g assessments ofcognitive function)Mo<strong>to</strong>r (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gsensorimo<strong>to</strong>r)(See 6.7 for policies onrequest<strong>in</strong>g assessments ofmo<strong>to</strong>r function)Sensory: hear<strong>in</strong>g(See guidel<strong>in</strong>es forrequest<strong>in</strong>g hear<strong>in</strong>gassessments <strong>in</strong> Chapter 18)Sensory: vision(See guidel<strong>in</strong>es forrequest<strong>in</strong>g visionassessments <strong>in</strong> Chapter 21)Functional assessmentsScreen<strong>in</strong>g Test such as MOCA,MMSE, SIMARD MD, Trails A orTrails B (cognitive screen)<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment (<strong>in</strong>-office androad tests)Occupational therapist (OT) or driverrehabilitation specialist assessmentwhich may <strong>in</strong>clude an <strong>in</strong>-officeassessment and/or a road testAudiogram (hear<strong>in</strong>g report)Exam<strong>in</strong>ation of Visual Functions(EVF)Visual Field Test (VFT)OT or driver rehabilitation specialistassessment which may <strong>in</strong>clude both an<strong>in</strong>-office assessment and a road test43


Persistent and episodic impairments6.5.3 A case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r may request a functional assessmen<strong>to</strong>f an <strong>in</strong>dividual with a persistent impairment. A case manager oradjudica<strong>to</strong>r will not request a functional assessment of an<strong>in</strong>dividual who has only episodic impairments.Multiple functional impairments6.5.4 If a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r decides that more than one of thefunctions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g needs <strong>to</strong> be assessed, the casemanager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will request functional assessments <strong>in</strong> thefollow<strong>in</strong>g order:(a) assessments of cognitive function(b) assessments of sensory function, and(c) assessments of mo<strong>to</strong>r function.If the results of an assessment <strong>in</strong>dicate that an <strong>in</strong>dividual’scognitive, sensory or mo<strong>to</strong>r function is impaired <strong>to</strong> the extent thatthe <strong>in</strong>dividual presents a high degree of risk <strong>to</strong> public safety whendriv<strong>in</strong>g the types of mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicles allowed under the class oflicence held or applied for, the case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r willmake a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation without request<strong>in</strong>g furtherassessments of the other functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g.Multiple medical conditions6.5.5 If an <strong>in</strong>dividual has multiple medical conditions that result <strong>in</strong> acumulative or comb<strong>in</strong>ed effect on the functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g such that the medical conditions cannot be considered<strong>in</strong>dividually or <strong>in</strong>dependently, a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r willrequest functional assessments of each function that may beimpaired, even if the medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es for eachidentified medical condition <strong>in</strong>dicate that the <strong>in</strong>dividual is fit <strong>to</strong>drive.Policy rationaleConsistent with OSMV’s functional approach <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g fitness, a casemanager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will request an assessment of an <strong>in</strong>dividual’sfunctional ability <strong>to</strong> drive whenever that <strong>in</strong>formation is necessary <strong>in</strong> order<strong>to</strong> make a driv<strong>in</strong>g fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation.44


Persistent and episodic impairmentsWhether or not a functional assessment is appropriate depends upon thetype of impairment. Because persistent impairments are measurable,testable and observable, it is possible <strong>to</strong> assess an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s functionalability <strong>to</strong> drive through observation by a physician or other health carepractitioner or an OT or driver rehabilitation specialist. Because episodicimpairments are not measurable or testable, OSMV cannot functionallyassess how the impairment impacts an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s ability <strong>to</strong> drive.Multiple functional impairmentsSome <strong>in</strong>dividuals may have impairments <strong>to</strong> more than one of the functionsnecessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g. In this situation, a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>rprioritizes requests for functional assessments based on the functions thatmay be impaired. Because there are assessment <strong>to</strong>ols available <strong>to</strong>specifically measure cognitive impairment as it relates <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g, if an<strong>in</strong>dividual’s cognitive function may be impaired a case manager oradjudica<strong>to</strong>r will assess that function first. Sensory functions are assessednext, followed by mo<strong>to</strong>r functions. If an assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that afunction is impaired, a driver is not fit <strong>to</strong> drive and there is no need <strong>to</strong>cont<strong>in</strong>ue with further assessments of the other functions that may beimpaired.Multiple medical conditionsThe impact of multiple medical conditions on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive isvery important when mak<strong>in</strong>g determ<strong>in</strong>ations about fitness <strong>to</strong> drive.Research results <strong>in</strong>dicate that drivers with multiple medical conditions are,<strong>in</strong> general, at higher risk for crashes and at-fault crashes than those with as<strong>in</strong>gle medical condition.The medical condition chapters <strong>in</strong> Part 3 of this Manual each focus on as<strong>in</strong>gle medical condition, e.g. cardiovascular disease, and the guidel<strong>in</strong>esare written as if an <strong>in</strong>dividual only had one medical condition. This isbecause the number of comb<strong>in</strong>ations of illnesses and medications issimply <strong>to</strong>o large <strong>to</strong> make reliable and valid driv<strong>in</strong>g guidel<strong>in</strong>es that couldsupport mak<strong>in</strong>g decisions about driv<strong>in</strong>g fitness for specific <strong>in</strong>dividuals.This means that the medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es cannot always be reliedupon <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> make a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation for an <strong>in</strong>dividual withmore than one medical condition. While the guidel<strong>in</strong>es for each <strong>in</strong>dividualmedical condition may <strong>in</strong>dicate that the driver is fit <strong>to</strong> drive, if the medicalconditions have a cumulative effect on the functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive, the<strong>in</strong>dividual may, <strong>in</strong> fact, not be fit. Therefore, OSMV always requestsfunctional assessments of <strong>in</strong>dividuals with multiple medical conditions45


that cannot be considered <strong>in</strong>dependently, unless the medical conditionguidel<strong>in</strong>es for any of the identified medical conditions clearly <strong>in</strong>dicate thatthe <strong>in</strong>dividual is not fit <strong>to</strong> drive.6.6 Request<strong>in</strong>g assessments of cognitive functionPolicy6.6.1 A case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will request a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLEassessment of an <strong>in</strong>dividual when cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicatesfurther assessment is required.6.6.2 In exceptional circumstances, e.g. if a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessmentcentre is not accessible <strong>to</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual, a case manager oradjudica<strong>to</strong>r may request an OT or driver rehabilitation specialistassessment, or a geron<strong>to</strong>logist assessment, of an <strong>in</strong>dividual with apersistent cognitive impairment whose cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g testresults <strong>in</strong>dicate further assessment is required.Policy rationaleHis<strong>to</strong>rically, there has not been consistent practice amongst medicalprofessionals perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the choice of cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g assessments.The assessment results that are most frequently submitted <strong>to</strong> OSMV arethe MOCA, the MMSE, Trails A and B, or the SIMARD MD. OSMVwill accept and consider the results of any or all of these assessments. Theadjudica<strong>to</strong>r will also consider any other available collateral <strong>in</strong>formationand determ<strong>in</strong>e if the entirety of the file <strong>in</strong>formation supports a f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g ofsufficient cognitive function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> drive safely, or if additional <strong>in</strong>formationis required.<strong>Drive</strong>ABLEAs of May 2013, <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessments are available <strong>in</strong> 28 locationsdistributed throughout <strong>BC</strong>. A <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment is specificallydesigned <strong>to</strong> identify cognitive impairments <strong>in</strong> experienced drivers. Thefirst component is an <strong>in</strong>-office assessment conducted by a qualified<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessor that requires the driver <strong>to</strong> complete a series of taskson a <strong>to</strong>uch-screen computer. No computer familiarity is needed, as amouse and keyboard are never used. Those <strong>in</strong> the most competent rangeare identified through au<strong>to</strong>mated scor<strong>in</strong>g procedures and do not require46


further assessment. <strong>Drive</strong>rs who score <strong>in</strong> the lower or <strong>in</strong>determ<strong>in</strong>ate rangeproceed <strong>to</strong> an on-road evaluation for the second stage of the assessment.The on-road evaluation is different from regular road tests and isadm<strong>in</strong>istered by a qualified <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE evalua<strong>to</strong>r. The on-roadevaluation, which is done <strong>in</strong> a dual-brake vehicle for safety, utilizes a routewhich is specifically chosen <strong>to</strong> reveal errors made by drivers who havebecome unsafe due <strong>to</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> cognitive abilities.6.7 Request<strong>in</strong>g assessments of mo<strong>to</strong>r functionPolicy6.7.1 A case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will request an OT or driverrehabilitation specialist assessment if further <strong>in</strong>formation isrequired on an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s mo<strong>to</strong>r function.6.7.2 Generally, further <strong>in</strong>formation on an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s mo<strong>to</strong>r functionwill be required when a medical assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that there issome loss of mo<strong>to</strong>r function and:(a) it is unknown whether the <strong>in</strong>dividual possesses sufficientmovement and strength <strong>to</strong> perform the mo<strong>to</strong>r functionsnecessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g the types of mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicles permittedunder the class of licence held or applied for(b) it is unknown whether pa<strong>in</strong> associated with a medicalcondition, or the medications used <strong>to</strong> treat a medical condition,adversely affect the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s mo<strong>to</strong>r function, and/or(c) it is unknown whether the <strong>in</strong>dividual can safely operate thetype of mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicles permitted under the class of licence heldor applied for us<strong>in</strong>g the vehicle modifications and devices thatmay be required <strong>to</strong> compensate for their functional impairment.Policy rationaleOccupational therapists and other specialists with expertise <strong>in</strong> driverrehabilitation are tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>to</strong> perform both <strong>in</strong>-office and on-roadassessments of an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive. In particular,driver rehabilitation specialists are tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>to</strong> evaluate an <strong>in</strong>dividual’sability <strong>to</strong> compensate for mo<strong>to</strong>r deficits dur<strong>in</strong>g simulated and on-roadtest<strong>in</strong>g and determ<strong>in</strong>e requirements for adaptive driv<strong>in</strong>g equipment andvehicle modifications.47


6.8 Time period dur<strong>in</strong>g which assessments are validPolicy6.8.1 Generally, a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will accept the results ofany assessment conducted with<strong>in</strong> the previous one-year period,even if completed for another purpose, as long as it provides thecase manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r with the required <strong>in</strong>formation.Policy rationaleAssessments may be costly and time-consum<strong>in</strong>g for drivers, OSMV andhealth care providers. If an assessment has already been conducted thatprovides a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r with the <strong>in</strong>formation required for adriver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation, there is no need for an <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>to</strong> be reassessed,so long as the results of the assessment are still reliable. Becausemany conditions are progressive, and an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s abilities may changeover time, assessment results generally only cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> be reliable for aperiod of one year after completion of the assessment.6.9 Time limits for drivers <strong>to</strong> complete assessmentsPolicy6.9.1 Whenever a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r requests an assessment,the case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will <strong>in</strong>form the <strong>in</strong>dividual of thetime period with<strong>in</strong> which the assessment must be completed.6.9.2 A case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will allow an <strong>in</strong>dividual 30 days <strong>to</strong>comply with a request for an(a) Exam<strong>in</strong>ation of Visual Functions(b) Visual Field Test(c) Hear<strong>in</strong>g Report, or(d) <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment.6.9.3 A case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will allow an <strong>in</strong>dividual 45 days <strong>to</strong>comply with a request for a driver’s medical exam<strong>in</strong>ation or othermedical assessment.48


6.9.4 A case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will allow an <strong>in</strong>dividual 60 days <strong>to</strong>comply with a request for an OT or driver rehabilitation specialistassessment.6.9.5 Upon request, a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r may extend the timeperiod for an <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>to</strong> comply with a request for anassessment. In consider<strong>in</strong>g whether <strong>to</strong> extend the time period, thecase manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will consider <strong>in</strong>formation from the<strong>in</strong>dividual regard<strong>in</strong>g the circumstances that necessitate anextension, such as(a) work commitments(b) the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s location,(c) the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s degree of mobility, and/or(d) availability of assessors.6.9.6 If an <strong>in</strong>dividual does not comply with a request for an assessmentwith<strong>in</strong> the time period or extension set by a case manager oradjudica<strong>to</strong>r:(a) the case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will direct IC<strong>BC</strong> <strong>to</strong> cancel the<strong>in</strong>dividual’s driver’s licence, <strong>in</strong> the case of an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isalready licensed, or(b) IC<strong>BC</strong> will not grant a licence, <strong>in</strong> the case of an <strong>in</strong>dividual whohas applied for a licence.Policy rationaleBoth for public safety and adm<strong>in</strong>istrative fairness reasons, driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ations must be made as soon as possible after an <strong>in</strong>dividual isidentified through screen<strong>in</strong>g. Where further <strong>in</strong>formation is required <strong>in</strong>order <strong>to</strong> make a determ<strong>in</strong>ation, this means that <strong>in</strong>dividuals must complywith requests for assessments <strong>in</strong> a timely fashion. OSMV has set timelimits <strong>in</strong> policy, based on the typical time required <strong>to</strong> comply with arequest for an assessment, consider<strong>in</strong>g such fac<strong>to</strong>rs as assessor availabilityand the variability of <strong>in</strong>dividual schedules. If an <strong>in</strong>dividual does notcomply with a request for an assessment, OSMV has the authority undersection 92 of the MVA <strong>to</strong> direct IC<strong>BC</strong> <strong>to</strong> cancel a licence.49


6.10 Assessment proceduresThe flowchart on the follow<strong>in</strong>g page graphically represents the proceduresassociated with the assessment process. Because the procedures that guide<strong>in</strong>take agents are documented elsewhere, the only procedures outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>this manual are those that guide the work of case managers andadjudica<strong>to</strong>rs.50


ASSESSMENT PROCEDURESCase manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>rreviews DMER, <strong>in</strong>formation onfile and relevant medicalcondition guidel<strong>in</strong>esYesIs further<strong>in</strong>formation onmedical condition(s)required?YesCase manager oradjudica<strong>to</strong>r sendsletter <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividualrequest<strong>in</strong>g a medicalassessmentDoes<strong>in</strong>dividual completeassessment with<strong>in</strong> settime period?NoNoDomedical conditionsresult only <strong>in</strong> episodicimpairments?YesTo Determ<strong>in</strong>ationDoes <strong>in</strong>dividual askfor an extension <strong>to</strong> settime period?NoYesIs further<strong>in</strong>formationon functional abilityrequired?NoCase manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>rconsiders request anddeterm<strong>in</strong>es whether or not <strong>to</strong>grant an extensionYesNoDid the <strong>in</strong>dividualscore X or higher on theSIMARD?YesCase manager oradjudica<strong>to</strong>r sends letter <strong>to</strong><strong>in</strong>dividual request<strong>in</strong>g a<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessmentDoes casemanager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>rextend time period?NoIs further<strong>in</strong>formation on sensoryfunction required?YesCase manager oradjudica<strong>to</strong>r sends letter <strong>to</strong><strong>in</strong>dividual request<strong>in</strong>g theappropriate sensoryassessmentNoIf <strong>in</strong>dividual is licensed, casemanager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r directsIC<strong>BC</strong> <strong>to</strong> cancel licenceYesNoIs further<strong>in</strong>formation on mo<strong>to</strong>rfunction required?YesCase manager oradjudica<strong>to</strong>r sends letter <strong>to</strong><strong>in</strong>dividual request<strong>in</strong>g anOT or driver rehabilitationspecialist assessmentCase manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>rsends letter <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividualrequest<strong>in</strong>g assessmentNoTo Determ<strong>in</strong>ation51


Chapter 7:Determ<strong>in</strong>ation Policies and Procedures7.1 OverviewThe follow<strong>in</strong>g flowchart is an excerpt from the overview flowchartpresented <strong>in</strong> 4.1 that highlights <strong>in</strong> red the steps <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>ation.From2. AssessmentAn adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case manager reviews the DMER and anyother assessment results, driv<strong>in</strong>g record, other <strong>in</strong>formation onfile and medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es and determ<strong>in</strong>es whetherdriver is fit <strong>to</strong> driveIs the driver fit <strong>to</strong> drive?NoYesIs a reassessmentInterval required?The adjudica<strong>to</strong>r orcase manager sendsthe driver a lettercommunicat<strong>in</strong>g thedeterm<strong>in</strong>ationYesNoThe adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case managerschedules a reassessmentAre conditions orrestrictions required?YesNoEnd of processNoDoes the driver ask for areview of the decision?YesTo4. Reconsideration52


A driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation is any decision regard<strong>in</strong>g fitness <strong>to</strong> drivethat requires the exercise of discretion. Determ<strong>in</strong>ations are made byadjudica<strong>to</strong>rs and case managers. To make a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation, acase manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r considers the <strong>in</strong>formation collected throughassessment, as well as any other relevant <strong>in</strong>formation on file, anddeterm<strong>in</strong>es whether an <strong>in</strong>dividual is fit <strong>to</strong> drive the types of mo<strong>to</strong>r vehiclespermitted under the licence class held or applied for. The determ<strong>in</strong>ationmay also <strong>in</strong>clude a decision <strong>to</strong> impose restrictions or conditions. If an<strong>in</strong>dividual is fit <strong>to</strong> drive, the case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will also decidewhether re-assessment at a future date is required.The fac<strong>to</strong>rs that are relevant <strong>to</strong> a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation for aparticular <strong>in</strong>dividual vary somewhat depend<strong>in</strong>g upon whether the<strong>in</strong>dividual has a persistent or episodic impairment, the function that isimpaired, whether conditions and/or restrictions may be appropriate andthe types of vehicles the <strong>in</strong>dividual wishes <strong>to</strong> drive. The policies outl<strong>in</strong>ed<strong>in</strong> this chapter, and the medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> themedical condition chapters <strong>in</strong> Part 3, provide guidance <strong>to</strong> case managersand adjudica<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> consider<strong>in</strong>g these fac<strong>to</strong>rs and mak<strong>in</strong>g driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ations.7.2 Components of driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ationsDef<strong>in</strong>itionsFit <strong>to</strong> drivemeans that an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s mo<strong>to</strong>r, sensory and cognitive functions aresufficient <strong>to</strong> drive safelyPolicy7.2.1 As part of each driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation, a case manager oradjudica<strong>to</strong>r will determ<strong>in</strong>e:(a) whether an <strong>in</strong>dividual is fit <strong>to</strong> drive the types of mo<strong>to</strong>r vehiclesallowed under the class of licence held or applied for(b) whether any restrictions or conditions are required <strong>in</strong> order foran <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>to</strong> be fit <strong>to</strong> drive the types of mo<strong>to</strong>r vehiclesallowed under the class of licence held or applied for (see 7.9for policies on impos<strong>in</strong>g restrictions and conditions), and53


(c) if the <strong>in</strong>dividual is fit <strong>to</strong> drive, whether re-assessment at afuture date will be required (see 7.11 for policies ondeterm<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whether re-assessment is required and sett<strong>in</strong>g reassessment<strong>in</strong>tervals).Policy rationaleA driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation may <strong>in</strong>clude several components. Whetheran <strong>in</strong>dividual is fit <strong>to</strong> drive may be dependent upon whether an <strong>in</strong>dividualis able <strong>to</strong> compensate for their functional impairment, or reduce theprobability or consequence of functional impairment, through the use ofadaptive devices or compliance with a prescribed treatment regime ormedications. In order <strong>to</strong> give <strong>in</strong>dividuals the maximum licens<strong>in</strong>g privilegethat is consistent with public safety, a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r maydecide <strong>in</strong> this situation <strong>to</strong> give restricted or conditional driv<strong>in</strong>g privileges<strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals who would otherwise not be fit <strong>to</strong> drive.Medical conditions and their effects often change over time. In order <strong>to</strong>give <strong>in</strong>dividuals the maximum licens<strong>in</strong>g privilege for which they arecurrently fit, while ensur<strong>in</strong>g that any change <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s level ofimpairment is identified and acted upon, a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation will<strong>in</strong>clude a determ<strong>in</strong>ation of whether re-assessment is required for all<strong>in</strong>dividuals who are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.7.3 Mak<strong>in</strong>g driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for persistent andepisodic impairments7.3.1 A case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will make a driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ation for an <strong>in</strong>dividual with a persistent impairment basedon evidence of functional impairment.7.3.2 A case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will make a driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ation for an <strong>in</strong>dividual with an episodic impairment basedon the risk of functional impairment.54


Policy rationaleBecause <strong>in</strong>dividuals with episodic impairments are not cont<strong>in</strong>uouslyimpaired, case managers and adjudica<strong>to</strong>rs cannot make determ<strong>in</strong>ations for<strong>in</strong>dividuals with episodic impairments based on evidence of functionalimpairment. Instead, they must rely on a risk analysis that takes <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong>account the probability and consequence of impairment when mak<strong>in</strong>g adriver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation for an <strong>in</strong>dividual with an episodic impairment.To assist case managers and adjudica<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> perform<strong>in</strong>g this analysis, themedical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es for medical conditions that result <strong>in</strong> episodicimpairments <strong>in</strong>corporate expert op<strong>in</strong>ion regard<strong>in</strong>g the risk of functionalimpairment.7.4 Mak<strong>in</strong>g driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for <strong>in</strong>dividuals whosecognitive ability <strong>to</strong> drive may be persistently impairedPolicy7.4.1 If collateral <strong>in</strong>formation and cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicate that the<strong>in</strong>dividual’s cognitive function is sufficient <strong>to</strong> safely drive, a<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment will not be required.7.4.2 If an <strong>in</strong>dividual passes a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE <strong>in</strong>-office assessment or<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE on-road evaluation, the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s cognitive functionis sufficient <strong>to</strong> drive safely.7.4.3 If an <strong>in</strong>dividual fails a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE on-road evaluation, the<strong>in</strong>dividual’s cognitive function is not sufficient <strong>to</strong> drive safely andthe <strong>in</strong>dividual is not fit <strong>to</strong> drive.Policy rationale6, Ccognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g tests and <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessments are used <strong>to</strong>identify impairment of cognitive ability <strong>to</strong> drive. This means that driverfitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for <strong>in</strong>dividuals whose cognitive ability <strong>to</strong> drive maybe persistently impaired can be based on the results of these assessmentsalone, unless the <strong>in</strong>dividual also has possible impairment of their mo<strong>to</strong>r orsensory functions.55


7.5 Mak<strong>in</strong>g driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for <strong>in</strong>dividuals whosemo<strong>to</strong>r or sensory function may be impaired or who may haveepisodic impairment of cognitive function7.5.1 When mak<strong>in</strong>g a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation for an <strong>in</strong>dividualwhose mo<strong>to</strong>r or sensory function may be impaired, or who mayhave episodic impairment of cognitive function, a case manager oradjudica<strong>to</strong>r will review and consider:(a) <strong>in</strong>formation obta<strong>in</strong>ed through medical assessments(b) <strong>in</strong>formation obta<strong>in</strong>ed through any functional assessments(c) the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s driv<strong>in</strong>g record (see 7.6 for policies onconsider<strong>in</strong>g driv<strong>in</strong>g records)(d) specific driv<strong>in</strong>g or safety requirements associated with thetypes of mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicles that the <strong>in</strong>dividual wishes <strong>to</strong> drive (see7.7 for policies on consider<strong>in</strong>g specific driv<strong>in</strong>g or safetyrequirements), and(e) the medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es for the identified medicalconditions.7.5.2 Generally, an <strong>in</strong>dividual whose mo<strong>to</strong>r or sensory functions may beimpaired, or who may have episodic impairment of cognitivefunction, is fit <strong>to</strong> drive if:(a) the medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es for the class of licence held orapplied for <strong>in</strong>dicate that they are fit <strong>to</strong> drive(b) the results of any functional assessments <strong>in</strong>dicate that the<strong>in</strong>dividual’s sensory, mo<strong>to</strong>r and cognitive functions aresufficient <strong>to</strong> safely drive the types of mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicles allowedunder the class of licence held or applied for(c) the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s driv<strong>in</strong>g record doesn’t <strong>in</strong>dicate that theidentified medical conditions impair the functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the extent that the <strong>in</strong>dividual presents a high degreeof risk <strong>to</strong> public safety when driv<strong>in</strong>g the mo<strong>to</strong>r vehiclesallowed under the class of licence held or applied for, and(d) there is no <strong>in</strong>dication that the <strong>in</strong>dividual will be non-compliantwith any restrictions or conditions that are required <strong>in</strong> order forthe <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>to</strong> be fit <strong>to</strong> drive (see 7.10 for policies onassess<strong>in</strong>g future compliance with restrictions or conditions).56


7.5.3 Generally, an <strong>in</strong>dividual whose mo<strong>to</strong>r or sensory functions may beimpaired, or who may have episodic impairment of cognitivefunction, is not fit <strong>to</strong> drive if:(a) the medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es for the class of licence held orapplied for <strong>in</strong>dicate that they are not fit <strong>to</strong> drive(b) the results of any recent functional assessments <strong>in</strong>dicate thatthe <strong>in</strong>dividual’s sensory, mo<strong>to</strong>r or cognitive functions areimpaired <strong>to</strong> the extent that the <strong>in</strong>dividual presents a high degreeof risk <strong>to</strong> public safety when driv<strong>in</strong>g the types of mo<strong>to</strong>rvehicles allowed under the class of licence held or applied for(c) the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s driv<strong>in</strong>g record <strong>in</strong>dicates that the identifiedmedical conditions impair the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong> the extent that the <strong>in</strong>dividual presents a high degree of risk <strong>to</strong>public safety when driv<strong>in</strong>g the mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicles allowed underthe class of licence held or applied for, and/or(d) the <strong>in</strong>dividual is not likely <strong>to</strong> be compliant with any restrictionsor conditions that must be imposed <strong>in</strong> order for the <strong>in</strong>dividual<strong>to</strong> be fit <strong>to</strong> drive (see 7.10 for policies on assess<strong>in</strong>g futurecompliance with restrictions or conditions).Policy rationaleExcept for <strong>in</strong>dividuals with persistent impairment of cognitive function,there are no assessment <strong>to</strong>ols available that can be relied upon <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicatewhether an <strong>in</strong>dividual is fit <strong>to</strong> drive. This means that case managers andadjudica<strong>to</strong>rs must review <strong>in</strong>formation from a variety of sources andexercise discretion and judgment when determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g driver fitness for<strong>in</strong>dividuals with other types of impairments.Case managers and adjudica<strong>to</strong>rs will generally rely on the medicalcondition guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>to</strong> make driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations. However,because each <strong>in</strong>dividual is unique, and <strong>in</strong>dividuals may have multiplemedical conditions or medical conditions which are not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> thisManual, case managers and adjudica<strong>to</strong>rs also review and consider an<strong>in</strong>dividual’s driv<strong>in</strong>g record and the results of any functional assessmentswhen determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whether an <strong>in</strong>dividual is fit <strong>to</strong> drive.In general, if a review of this <strong>in</strong>formation for an <strong>in</strong>dividual with apersistent impairment <strong>in</strong>dicates no functional impairment, or a level offunctional impairment that does not impact the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s ability <strong>to</strong> drivesafely, the <strong>in</strong>dividual is fit <strong>to</strong> drive. For <strong>in</strong>dividuals with episodic57


impairments, if a review of this <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>dicates a low risk offunctional impairment, the <strong>in</strong>dividual is fit <strong>to</strong> drive.Where any of this <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>dicates that the <strong>in</strong>dividual presents a highdegree of risk <strong>to</strong> public safety, the <strong>in</strong>dividual is not fit <strong>to</strong> drive. In the caseof an <strong>in</strong>dividual with a persistent impairment, this would be because thelevel of impairment means the <strong>in</strong>dividual cannot drive safely. In the caseof an <strong>in</strong>dividual with an episodic impairment, this means that the risk, orprobability and consequence, of an episodic impairment is high.7.6 Review<strong>in</strong>g driv<strong>in</strong>g recordsDef<strong>in</strong>itionsDriv<strong>in</strong>g record<strong>in</strong>cludes: the length of time an <strong>in</strong>dividual has been licensed driv<strong>in</strong>g offences driv<strong>in</strong>g sanctions applied current and past licence restriction(s) mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle related Crim<strong>in</strong>al Code convictions crash his<strong>to</strong>ry, and past road test results.Policy7.6.1 Dur<strong>in</strong>g every driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation, the case manager oradjudica<strong>to</strong>r will review the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s driv<strong>in</strong>g record for any<strong>in</strong>formation that <strong>in</strong>dicates whether the identified medicalconditions impair the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g.58


7.6.2 In particular, the case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will review:(a) whether there has been a deterioration, improvement or nochange <strong>in</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g safety (i.e. crashes, penalty po<strong>in</strong>ts and<strong>in</strong>fractions) that can be l<strong>in</strong>ked <strong>to</strong>:the date of onsetthe date of diagnosis, and/orthe date the <strong>in</strong>dividual began a new treatment regime,prescribed medication or compensation strategy, and(b) any evidence on file (e.g. police reports) that <strong>in</strong>dicates that<strong>in</strong>cidents were related <strong>to</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical conditions.Policy rationaleAn <strong>in</strong>dividual’s driv<strong>in</strong>g record may <strong>in</strong>dicate that a medical condition isaffect<strong>in</strong>g their functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive. A lengthy, clean driv<strong>in</strong>g recordfor a driver with a long-stand<strong>in</strong>g medical condition may be evidence of: a low level of impairment an ability <strong>to</strong> compensate, or a condition that is well controlled.A driv<strong>in</strong>g record with multiple crashes may <strong>in</strong>dicate functionalimpairment.7.7 Consider<strong>in</strong>g specific driv<strong>in</strong>g or safety requirementsPolicyWhen determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whether an <strong>in</strong>dividual is fit <strong>to</strong> drive the types of mo<strong>to</strong>rvehicles allowed under a commercial class of licence, a casemanager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will consider:(a) the number of hours an <strong>in</strong>dividual with that type of licencetypically spends driv<strong>in</strong>g(b) any physical requirements (e.g., load securement) associatedwith the operation of mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicles allowed under that type oflicence, and(c) any <strong>in</strong>formation provided by the <strong>in</strong>dividual or the <strong>in</strong>dividual’semployer regard<strong>in</strong>g:the types of vehicles they will be operat<strong>in</strong>g, andhow many passengers they will carry and for what purpose.59


Policy rationaleThe class of licence held or applied for is a key consideration whenmak<strong>in</strong>g a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation. Professional drivers who operatepassenger carry<strong>in</strong>g vehicles, trucks and emergency vehicles spend manymore hours at the wheel than drivers of private vehicles. Professionaldrivers may also be called upon <strong>to</strong> undertake heavy physical work such asload<strong>in</strong>g or unload<strong>in</strong>g their vehicles, realign<strong>in</strong>g shifted loads and putt<strong>in</strong>g onand remov<strong>in</strong>g cha<strong>in</strong>s.Because the physical and endurance requirements for commercial driversare generally more onerous than for private drivers, the medical conditionguidel<strong>in</strong>es outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Part 3 of this Manual often specify differentguidel<strong>in</strong>es for commercial and private drivers. Where the medicalcondition guidel<strong>in</strong>es do not apply, or where an <strong>in</strong>dividual provides specific<strong>in</strong>formation about their employment, a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r willconsider the fac<strong>to</strong>rs listed above when determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whether a commercialdriver is fit <strong>to</strong> drive. Where an <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong>dicates that they will only beoperat<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong> types of vehicles typically allowed under that licenceclass, or only operat<strong>in</strong>g vehicles under certa<strong>in</strong> circumstances, impositionof a restriction or condition may make an <strong>in</strong>dividual fit <strong>to</strong> drive.7.8 Consider<strong>in</strong>g whether an <strong>in</strong>dividual can compensateDef<strong>in</strong>itionsCompensationis the use of strategies or devices by a driver with a persistent impairment<strong>to</strong> compensate for the functional impairment caused by a medicalcondition. Treatment for a condition, e.g. medication, is not a type ofcompensation. Where available or known, possible compensationstrategies for each medical condition are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the medical conditionchapters <strong>in</strong> Part 3 of this Manual.Policy7.8.1 The case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will consider whether an<strong>in</strong>dividual can compensate for their functional impairment whenmak<strong>in</strong>g a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation.7.8.2 An <strong>in</strong>dividual cannot compensate for an episodic impairment.60


7.8.3 Whether an <strong>in</strong>dividual can compensate for a persistent impairmentdepends upon the functional ability that is impaired. Individualswith impairments <strong>in</strong> mo<strong>to</strong>r function, vision or hear<strong>in</strong>g may be able<strong>to</strong> compensate for those impairments. Individuals with progressiveor irreversible decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> cognitive function cannot compensatefor a cognitive impairment.7.8.4 In general, an <strong>in</strong>dividual who can compensate for their functionalimpairment is fit <strong>to</strong> drive.Policy rationaleIn some situations, <strong>in</strong>dividuals who would otherwise not be fit <strong>to</strong> drivehave learned strategies, or utilize devices, that reduce or elim<strong>in</strong>ate theirfunctional impairment. For example:a driver with limited peripheral vision may use the strategy of turn<strong>in</strong>gtheir neck <strong>to</strong> the left and right <strong>to</strong> ensure they have a full field of view,ora driver who is unable <strong>to</strong> use their lower limbs may have their vehiclemodified for hand controls.In keep<strong>in</strong>g with the decision <strong>in</strong> Grismer, and the guid<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of the<strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program, OSMV makes driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations on an<strong>in</strong>dividual basis, based on the results of <strong>in</strong>dividual assessments. Ingeneral, if a review of <strong>in</strong>dividual assessment results and the <strong>in</strong>dividual’sdriv<strong>in</strong>g record <strong>in</strong>dicates that an <strong>in</strong>dividual is able <strong>to</strong> compensate for theirfunctional impairment, the <strong>in</strong>dividual is fit <strong>to</strong> drive.61


7.9 Impos<strong>in</strong>g restrictions and/or conditionsDef<strong>in</strong>itionsConditionmeans a condition that is imposed on an <strong>in</strong>dividual by OSMV. Unlikerestrictions, which are placed on a licence and enforceable at roadside,conditions are placed on a driver and are not enforceable at roadside.Examples of conditions are ‘do not drive if your blood sugar drops below4mmol/L,’ or ‘do not drive if your dialysis treatment is delayed.’Restrictionmeans a restriction that is pr<strong>in</strong>ted on a driver’s licence and is enforceableat the roadside through f<strong>in</strong>es. Non-compliance with a restriction is anoffence.Restrictions are commonly used for impairments where a driver cancompensate. However, on occasion they may be used for impairments forwhich a driver cannot compensate. Examples of restrictions where adriver can compensate for their persistent impairment are ‘wear correctivelenses’, ‘must only drive modified vehicle with steer<strong>in</strong>g knob’ and ‘useoversized mirrors.’ A restriction where a driver cannot compensate wouldbe ‘do not drive at night’ for persistent night bl<strong>in</strong>dness.Policy7.9.1 Where applicable, a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will refer <strong>to</strong> themedical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>to</strong> identify the restrictions and/orconditions that may be required <strong>in</strong> order for an <strong>in</strong>dividual with theidentified medical conditions <strong>to</strong> be fit <strong>to</strong> drive.Restrictions7.9.2 If a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r decides that an <strong>in</strong>dividual must:(a) only operate vehicles dur<strong>in</strong>g daylight hours(b) only operate certa<strong>in</strong> types of vehicles(c) only operate vehicles <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> geographic areas(d) only operate vehicles under a certa<strong>in</strong> speed(e) only carry certa<strong>in</strong> types of cargo(f) wear specific devices, and/or(g) use specific vehicle modifications or adaptations62


<strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> be fit <strong>to</strong> drive, the case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r willimpose those restrictions on the licence.The follow<strong>in</strong>g table lists the restrictions used by the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong>Program.CodeDescription12 Restricted <strong>to</strong> daylight hours only14 No Hwy 99 S of Van or Hwy 1E of Van or W of Hwy 9915 Permitted <strong>to</strong> operate vehicles with air brakes16 Not permitted <strong>to</strong> operate class 2 or 417 Not permitted <strong>to</strong> operate buses18 Permitted <strong>to</strong> operate s<strong>in</strong>gle trucks with air brakes on<strong>in</strong>dustrial roads1920Permitted <strong>to</strong> operate truck trailer with air brakes on<strong>in</strong>dustrial roadsPermitted <strong>to</strong> operate trailer of any GVW without airbrakes21 Corrective lenses required23 Hear<strong>in</strong>g aid required with class 1,2,3,4 or for 18/1924 Class 6 or 8 restricted <strong>to</strong> mo<strong>to</strong>r scooters25 Fitted prosthesis/leg brace required26 Specified vehicle modifications required28 Restricted <strong>to</strong> au<strong>to</strong>matic transmission35 Not permitted <strong>to</strong> exceed 60 km/hr36 Not permitted <strong>to</strong> exceed 80 km/hr37 Not permitted <strong>to</strong> transport dangerous goods51 Other – specify type of restriction7.9.3 A case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will not impose restrictions on an<strong>in</strong>dividual who only has episodic impairments.Conditions7.9.4 If a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r decides that an <strong>in</strong>dividual must:63


(a) s<strong>to</strong>p driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> specific circumstances(b) take prescribed medications(c) comply with a specific treatment regime, and/or(d) attend medical follow-up<strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> be fit <strong>to</strong> drive, the case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r willimpose those conditions on the <strong>in</strong>dividual.7.9.5 A case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r may impose conditions on<strong>in</strong>dividuals with persistent or episodic impairments.Unique restrictions or conditions7.9.6 Imposition of restrictions or conditions other than those listedabove must be approved by the Assistant Direc<strong>to</strong>r of Hear<strong>in</strong>gs andFair Practices.Policy rationaleSection 25 (12) of the MVA gives the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent the authority <strong>to</strong>place any restrictions or conditions on a person’s licence that theSuper<strong>in</strong>tendent considers necessary for the operation of a mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle bythe person. Generally, case managers and adjudica<strong>to</strong>rs will refer <strong>to</strong> themedical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e the conditions and/orrestrictions that are required. However, because the medical conditionguidel<strong>in</strong>es may not always apply <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual circumstances, the types ofrestrictions and conditions that are appropriate for driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ations are also outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this policy. The appropriate types ofrestrictions and conditions are limited <strong>to</strong> ensure that they are supported bydriver fitness research and <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program policy. Also, <strong>in</strong> thecase of restrictions, they must be enforced easily at roadside.7.10 Consider<strong>in</strong>g compliance with conditions or restrictionsDef<strong>in</strong>itionsInsightmeans that a driver:is aware of their medical conditionunderstands how the condition may impair their functional ability <strong>to</strong>drive, and64


has the judgment and will<strong>in</strong>gness <strong>to</strong> comply with their treatmentregime and any conditions or restrictions imposed by OSMV.Physicians will often use terms such as “impaired awareness,” “decreasedmetacognition,” or “lack of awareness regard<strong>in</strong>g deficits” on a medicalassessment <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicate that an <strong>in</strong>dividual lacks <strong>in</strong>sight.An <strong>in</strong>dividual’s level of <strong>in</strong>sight is a critical consideration when assess<strong>in</strong>gthe risk of an episodic impairment of functional ability due <strong>to</strong> a psychiatricdisorder. Because of this, there is a specific guidel<strong>in</strong>e regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>the Psychiatric Disorders chapter.Policy7.10.1 If a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r decides that restrictions and/orconditions are required <strong>in</strong> order for an <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>to</strong> be fit <strong>to</strong> drive,the case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will review:(a) medical assessments on file for <strong>in</strong>formation that <strong>in</strong>dicates thatthe <strong>in</strong>dividual has, or lacks, <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> their medical conditionor its impact on the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g(b) medical assessments on file for <strong>in</strong>formation that <strong>in</strong>dicates thatthe <strong>in</strong>dividual is non-compliant with their prescribed treatmentregime or medications(c) the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s driv<strong>in</strong>g record for any <strong>in</strong>formation that<strong>in</strong>dicates the <strong>in</strong>dividual has been non-compliant withrestrictions or conditions <strong>in</strong> the past, and(d) any credible reports for <strong>in</strong>formation that <strong>in</strong>dicates that the<strong>in</strong>dividual has been non-compliant with restrictions orconditions <strong>in</strong> the past.7.10.2 Without <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>to</strong> the contrary, a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>rwill assume that an <strong>in</strong>dividual will comply with a restriction orcondition. However, if the <strong>in</strong>formation obta<strong>in</strong>ed from this review<strong>in</strong>dicates that the <strong>in</strong>dividual is not likely <strong>to</strong> be compliant with anyrestrictions and/or conditions that are required <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> be fit <strong>to</strong>drive, the case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will not impose therestriction or condition and the <strong>in</strong>dividual is not fit <strong>to</strong> drive.65


Policy rationaleA key consideration when determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whether or not a restriction orcondition is appropriate is whether an <strong>in</strong>dividual is likely <strong>to</strong> comply withthe restriction or condition. Because restrictions or conditions are onlyimposed if required for driver fitness, if a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>rdecides that an <strong>in</strong>dividual is not likely <strong>to</strong> comply with the condition orrestriction, the <strong>in</strong>dividual is not fit <strong>to</strong> drive.One key fac<strong>to</strong>r for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whether an <strong>in</strong>dividual is likely <strong>to</strong> complywith restrictions or conditions is the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s level of <strong>in</strong>sight. This isbecause <strong>in</strong>dividuals with good <strong>in</strong>sight are more likely <strong>to</strong> be diligent abouttheir treatment regime, <strong>to</strong> seek medical attention when needed, and <strong>to</strong>avoid driv<strong>in</strong>g when their condition is likely <strong>to</strong> impair their functionalability <strong>to</strong> drive.7.11 Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g re-assessment <strong>in</strong>tervalsDef<strong>in</strong>itionsRe-assessmentis the process of screen<strong>in</strong>g, assessment and determ<strong>in</strong>ation for an <strong>in</strong>dividualwith a previously reported medical condition. Re-assessment is <strong>in</strong>itiatedwhen a request for a driver’s medical exam<strong>in</strong>ation or an EVF is sent <strong>to</strong> an<strong>in</strong>dividual at the expiration of an OSMV-scheduled re-assessment <strong>in</strong>terval.66


Policy7.11.1 If a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r determ<strong>in</strong>es that an <strong>in</strong>dividual is fit<strong>to</strong> drive, or downgrades a commercial licence, the case manager oradjudica<strong>to</strong>r will also determ<strong>in</strong>e whether re-assessment is requiredat a future date and, if so, what the re-assessment <strong>in</strong>terval shouldbe.7.11.2 Generally, re-assessment will be required if:(a) the <strong>in</strong>dividual has a medical condition that is progressive(b) the driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation is based upon the effectivenessof a prescribed treatment regime and it is unknown whether thetreatment regime is likely <strong>to</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> be effective(c) the driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation is based upon the effectivenessof a prescribed treatment regime and it is unknown whether the<strong>in</strong>dividual is likely <strong>to</strong> comply with the treatment regime(d) the medical condition results <strong>in</strong> episodic impairment, the driverfitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation is based upon an <strong>in</strong>dividual hav<strong>in</strong>g aperiod of stability without an episodic event, and it is unknownwhether the medical condition is likely <strong>to</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> be stable(e) the medical condition results <strong>in</strong> an episodic impairment, thedriver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation is based upon a pattern of episodes,e.g. nocturnal seizures or auras, and it is unknown whether thepattern of episodes is likely <strong>to</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ue(f) it is recommended by a physician, and/or(g) the re-assessment <strong>in</strong>terval guidel<strong>in</strong>es for the medical condition<strong>in</strong>dicate that re-assessment is required.7.11.3 To determ<strong>in</strong>e whether re-assessment is required and, if so, theappropriate <strong>in</strong>terval, the case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will consider:(a) the re-assessment <strong>in</strong>terval guidel<strong>in</strong>es outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the relevantmedical condition chapter(s)(b) the date of onset, diagnosis and/or treatment of the medicalcondition, if known(c) the severity of the medical condition(d) whether the condition is stable and, if so, the period of stability(e) whether the condition is progressive and, if so, the rate ofprogression67


(f) whether the condition is controlled(g) if the <strong>in</strong>dividual is a commercial or ag<strong>in</strong>g driver, the date of thenext scheduled rout<strong>in</strong>e screen<strong>in</strong>g(h) whether the <strong>in</strong>dividual has been compliant with any prescribedtreatment regime, conditions or restrictions(i) the results of any functional assessments(j) the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s driv<strong>in</strong>g record, and/or(k) the recommendation of a physician.7.11.4 A case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will not schedule a re-assessment<strong>in</strong>terval for a private driver aged 80 or over, or a commercialdriver, if the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s next scheduled rout<strong>in</strong>e screen<strong>in</strong>g willprovide OSMV with the necessary opportunity for re-assessment.7.11.5 A case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r can set any re-assessment <strong>in</strong>tervalthat is appropriate for a particular <strong>in</strong>dividual. Generally, a casemanager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will set a re-assessment <strong>in</strong>terval at either:(a) 1 year(b) 2 years(c) 3 years, or(d) 5 years.7.11.6 Generally, a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will set a re-assessment<strong>in</strong>terval at 1 year if:(a) an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s cognitive function is impaired and the level ofcognitive impairment is likely <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease over time(b) the driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation is based upon the effectivenessof a prescribed treatment regime and it is unknown whether thetreatment regime is likely <strong>to</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> be effective(c) the driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation is based upon the effectivenessof a prescribed treatment regime and it is unknown whether the<strong>in</strong>dividual is likely <strong>to</strong> comply with the treatment regime(d) the medical condition results <strong>in</strong> episodic impairment, the driverfitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation is based upon an <strong>in</strong>dividual hav<strong>in</strong>g aperiod of stability without an episodic event, and it is unknownwhether the medical condition is likely <strong>to</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> be stable68


(e) the medical condition results <strong>in</strong> an episodic impairment, thedriver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation is based upon a pattern of episodes,e.g. nocturnal seizures or auras, and it is unknown whether thepattern of episodes is likely <strong>to</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ue7.11.7 In most other circumstances where re-assessment is required, acase manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will schedule a 2, 3 or 5 year reassessment<strong>in</strong>terval, depend<strong>in</strong>g upon the likely rate of progressionof the medical condition.Policy rationaleOSMV schedules re-assessments <strong>in</strong>tervals for <strong>in</strong>dividuals who are fit <strong>to</strong>drive at the time of a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation, but whose fitness <strong>to</strong>drive should be exam<strong>in</strong>ed aga<strong>in</strong> at a future date. Without a re-assessmentrequirement, these <strong>in</strong>dividuals may not aga<strong>in</strong> be brought <strong>to</strong> the attention ofOSMV until their functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive has deteriorated <strong>to</strong> the po<strong>in</strong>tthat they pose a high degree of risk <strong>to</strong> public safety. Re-assessment<strong>in</strong>tervals may be scheduled for both private and commercial drivers but, <strong>to</strong>ensure that <strong>in</strong>dividuals are not re-assessed unnecessarily, OSMV will notschedule a re-assessment <strong>in</strong>terval for a private driver aged 80 or over, or acommercial driver, if the next scheduled rout<strong>in</strong>e screen<strong>in</strong>g will provideOSMV with sufficient opportunity for re-assessment.To ensure that <strong>in</strong>dividuals are not re-assessed unnecessarily, OSMV policysets out the circumstances when re-assessment may be required. For<strong>in</strong>dividuals with persistent impairments, re-assessment may be requiredbecause their level of functional impairment may <strong>in</strong>crease due <strong>to</strong>:a progression of their medical condition(s), and/ora change <strong>in</strong> their response <strong>to</strong>, or compliance with, treatment.69


For <strong>in</strong>dividuals with episodic impairments, re-assessment may be requiredbecause their risk of functional impairment may <strong>in</strong>crease due <strong>to</strong>:a progression <strong>in</strong> their medical condition(s)a change <strong>in</strong> their response <strong>to</strong>, or compliance with, treatmenta change <strong>in</strong> stability, and/ora change <strong>in</strong> the pattern of episodes.The medical condition chapters provide guidel<strong>in</strong>es for sett<strong>in</strong>g reassessment<strong>in</strong>tervals for <strong>in</strong>dividuals with each medical condition. Forsome conditions, the recommended <strong>in</strong>terval is provided <strong>in</strong> the guidel<strong>in</strong>es.In those circumstances where a recommended <strong>in</strong>terval is not provided, orwhere <strong>in</strong>dividual circumstances may require a different <strong>in</strong>terval, e.g. whenthe <strong>in</strong>dividual has multiple medical conditions, the case manager oradjudica<strong>to</strong>r reviews a variety of <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e whether the<strong>in</strong>dividual’s level or risk of functional impairment may <strong>in</strong>crease and thetime period over which this <strong>in</strong>crease may take place.Re-assessment <strong>in</strong>tervals of less than 1 year are generally not scheduled,because the majority of medical conditions do not substantially progress <strong>in</strong>such a short period of time. Because of the rapid decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> cognitivefunction associated with many conditions, one year <strong>in</strong>tervals are usuallyscheduled for <strong>in</strong>dividuals with cognitive impairments. One year <strong>in</strong>tervalsare also scheduled for <strong>in</strong>dividuals with episodic impairments where it isunknown if the stability of the condition, the pattern of episodes or theeffectiveness of treatment is likely <strong>to</strong> change. This is because a period ofone year is usually sufficient <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e whether such a change is likely<strong>to</strong> occur <strong>in</strong> future.70


7.12 Communicat<strong>in</strong>g a decisionPolicyInform<strong>in</strong>g drivers of determ<strong>in</strong>ations7.12.1 A case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will send an <strong>in</strong>dividual a letter thatdescribes the driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation, the reasons for thedeterm<strong>in</strong>ation and the reconsideration process if thecase manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r decides that:(a) an <strong>in</strong>dividual is not fit <strong>to</strong> drive(b) conditions must be imposed on an <strong>in</strong>dividual, or(c) restrictions must be imposed on an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s licence.Inform<strong>in</strong>g IC<strong>BC</strong> of determ<strong>in</strong>ations7.12.2 A case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will direct IC<strong>BC</strong> <strong>to</strong> cancel a licenceif a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong>dicates that an <strong>in</strong>dividual is notfit <strong>to</strong> drive and the <strong>in</strong>dividual currently holds a licence.7.12.3 A case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r may direct IC<strong>BC</strong> <strong>to</strong> issue a class 5licence <strong>to</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual who holds a commercial licence if the casemanager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r determ<strong>in</strong>es that the <strong>in</strong>dividual is not fit <strong>to</strong>drive commercial vehicles but is fit <strong>to</strong> drive private vehicles.7.12.4 A case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will <strong>in</strong>form IC<strong>BC</strong> that an <strong>in</strong>dividualis not fit <strong>to</strong> be licensed if a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong>dicatesthat an <strong>in</strong>dividual is not fit <strong>to</strong> drive and the <strong>in</strong>dividual does notcurrently hold a licence.Policy rationaleBoth for adm<strong>in</strong>istrative fairness and public safety reasons, an <strong>in</strong>dividualmust be <strong>in</strong>formed of a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation that affects theirlicens<strong>in</strong>g privileges, the reasons for the determ<strong>in</strong>ation and the process forrequest<strong>in</strong>g a reconsideration of a determ<strong>in</strong>ation. If conditions orrestrictions are imposed, <strong>in</strong>dividuals must be made aware of the conditionsor restrictions so that they are able <strong>to</strong> comply with them <strong>in</strong> the future. If alicence is cancelled, the <strong>in</strong>dividual must be <strong>to</strong>ld <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>p driv<strong>in</strong>g andsurrender their licence.71


If OSMV determ<strong>in</strong>es that an <strong>in</strong>dividual is not fit <strong>to</strong> hold a licence of aparticular class, under section 92 of the MVA the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent maydirect IC<strong>BC</strong> <strong>to</strong> cancel an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s licence. Because the medicalcondition guidel<strong>in</strong>es often specify different standards for commercial andprivate drivers, an <strong>in</strong>dividual may be fit <strong>to</strong> drive private vehicles, eventhough they are not fit <strong>to</strong> drive commercial vehicles. In this situation, acase manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r may direct IC<strong>BC</strong> <strong>to</strong> issue a class 5 licenceafter cancell<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s commercial licence.72


7.13 Determ<strong>in</strong>ation proceduresThe follow<strong>in</strong>g flowchart graphically illustrates the procedures associatedwith the determ<strong>in</strong>ation process.DETERMINATION PROCEDURESFrom AssessmentMay the<strong>in</strong>dividual’s cognitivefunction be persistentlyimpaired?YesDoes theentirety of the file <strong>in</strong>formationsupport a f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of sufficientcognitive function<strong>to</strong> drive safely?NoDidthe <strong>in</strong>dividual pass a<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment?NoYesThe <strong>in</strong>dividual’s cognitivefunction is notpermanently impaired.YesCase manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>rreviews assessments, driv<strong>in</strong>grecord, credible reports,specific driv<strong>in</strong>g or safetyrequirements and medicalcondition guidel<strong>in</strong>es.YesDoesthe <strong>in</strong>dividual havepossible mo<strong>to</strong>r or sensoryimpairments?NoNoIs the <strong>in</strong>dividualfit <strong>to</strong> drive?NoCase manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>rsends letter <strong>in</strong>form<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>dividual of decision.YesCase manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r reviews reassessment policy and guidel<strong>in</strong>esIs a reassessment<strong>in</strong>terval required?To reconsiderationYesDoes <strong>in</strong>dividual ask for areview of the decision?NoYesCase manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r schedules reassessment.Are conditions orrestrictions required?YesCase manager oradjudica<strong>to</strong>r sends letter<strong>in</strong>form<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividual ofconditions orrestrictions.NoEnd of processNo73


Chapter 8:Reconsideration Policies and Procedures8.1 OverviewIf an <strong>in</strong>dividual asks OSMV <strong>to</strong> review a driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation, anadjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case manager will conduct a reconsideration of thatdecision. The follow<strong>in</strong>g flowchart is an excerpt from the overviewflowchart <strong>in</strong> 4.1 that highlights <strong>in</strong> red the steps <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong>reconsideration.From3. Determ<strong>in</strong>ationEnd of processNoDoes the driver ask for areview of the decision?YesThe adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case manager reconsiders thedecision and may request additional assessments. At theconclusion of the reconsideration, the adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or casemanager sends the <strong>in</strong>dividual a letter either confirm<strong>in</strong>g theorig<strong>in</strong>al determ<strong>in</strong>ation or substitut<strong>in</strong>g a new determ<strong>in</strong>ationEnd of process74


Dur<strong>in</strong>g the reconsideration, the adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case manager may requestadditional assessments, <strong>in</strong> accordance with the policies outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Chapter6 of this Manual.Once the adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case manager collects any additional <strong>in</strong>formationthat may be required, the adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case manager applies the policiesoutl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 7 of this Manual and decides whether the orig<strong>in</strong>aldriver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation was correct or whether a differentdeterm<strong>in</strong>ation is required.In some circumstances, a request for review will trigger a new driverfitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation, based on new assessment results, rather than areconsideration of a previous determ<strong>in</strong>ation. This will occur if an<strong>in</strong>dividual:submits new <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a change <strong>in</strong> their medicalcondition or functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive, orasks for a review of a determ<strong>in</strong>ation that is based on assessments thatare more than one year old.8.2 Conduct<strong>in</strong>g reconsiderationsPolicy8.2.1 If an <strong>in</strong>dividual asks <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g for a review of a driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ation, and provides detailed reasons for the request, anadjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case manager will reconsider the determ<strong>in</strong>ation.8.2.2 If the assessments upon which the determ<strong>in</strong>ation were based wereperformed more than one year prior <strong>to</strong> the date of the request forreview, a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will generally make a newdriver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation, based on new assessments, rather thanreconsider<strong>in</strong>g the previous determ<strong>in</strong>ation.75


8.2.3 If an <strong>in</strong>dividual submits new <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a change <strong>in</strong>their medical condition, or <strong>in</strong> their functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive, acase manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will make a new driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ation, based on new assessments, rather thanreconsider<strong>in</strong>g the previous determ<strong>in</strong>ation.8.2.4 At the conclusion of a reconsideration, the adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or casemanager will either confirm the orig<strong>in</strong>al driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ation or substitute a new determ<strong>in</strong>ation.8.2.5 The adjudica<strong>to</strong>r or case manager will provide the <strong>in</strong>dividual with aletter that describes the reconsideration decision and the reasonsfor the decision.Policy rationaleIn accordance with the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of adm<strong>in</strong>istrative fairness, OSMV give<strong>in</strong>dividuals an opportunity <strong>to</strong> dispute the results of a driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ation through its <strong>in</strong>ternal reconsideration process and provideswritten reasons with the results of the reconsideration.In certa<strong>in</strong> circumstances, a new driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation, rather than areconsideration, is the more appropriate response <strong>to</strong> a request for review.Reconsiderations are an opportunity <strong>to</strong> review whether the correctdeterm<strong>in</strong>ation was made given an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition orfunctional ability at the time the determ<strong>in</strong>ation was made. If an <strong>in</strong>dividualsubmits new <strong>in</strong>formation reflect<strong>in</strong>g a change <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medicalcondition or functional ability, a case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will make anew driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation, based on this new <strong>in</strong>formation and anyadditional assessments that the case manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r decides <strong>to</strong>request. Similarly, if an <strong>in</strong>dividual requests a review of a determ<strong>in</strong>ationthat is based upon assessments that are more than one year old, a casemanager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r will make a new determ<strong>in</strong>ation, rather thanreconsider<strong>in</strong>g the previous determ<strong>in</strong>ation. This is because the previousassessments upon which the determ<strong>in</strong>ation was based may no longerreflect the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s current medical condition or functional ability.76


8.3 Reconsideration proceduresThe follow<strong>in</strong>g flowchart graphically represents the procedures associatedwith the reconsideration process.RECONSIDERATION PROCEDURESFrom Determ<strong>in</strong>ationCase manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r reviewsrequest for reconsiderationDoes<strong>in</strong>dividualsubmit <strong>in</strong>formation<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g achange?YesTo AssessmentYesAre assessments morethan 1 year old?YesNoCase manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>rsends letter <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividualrequest<strong>in</strong>g assessmentYesIs any additional<strong>in</strong>formation required?NoCase manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r reviews orig<strong>in</strong>al assessments and anyadditional <strong>in</strong>formation and determ<strong>in</strong>es whether orig<strong>in</strong>al determ<strong>in</strong>ationshould be upheld or new determ<strong>in</strong>ation should be substitutedCase manager or adjudica<strong>to</strong>r sends letter <strong>in</strong>form<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividual of decisionEnd of process77


PART 3:MEDICAL CONDITIONCHAPTERS78


Chapter 9:Introduction <strong>to</strong> the Medical Condition Chapters9.1 Purpose of the medical condition chaptersThe medical condition chapters <strong>in</strong> this part of the Manual: identify what conditions may have an impact on an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s fitness<strong>to</strong> drive highlight the risk of impairment and crash associated with certa<strong>in</strong>medical conditions identify appropriate screen<strong>in</strong>g and assessment <strong>to</strong>ols <strong>to</strong> evaluate fitness<strong>to</strong> drive of an <strong>in</strong>dividual with a medical condition identify compensation strategies, devices and/or tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g that may beimplemented <strong>to</strong> compensate for the effects of a medical condition ondriv<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>in</strong>clude guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>to</strong> assist OSMV staff <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whether an<strong>in</strong>dividual with a medical condition is fit <strong>to</strong> drive and appropriate reassessment<strong>in</strong>tervals.9.2 Source of the medical condition chaptersThe medical condition chapters <strong>in</strong> this Manual are based primarily on the<strong>in</strong>tegrative review of Dr. Bonnie Dobbs and her report Medical Conditionsand Driv<strong>in</strong>g: Current Knowledge <strong>2010</strong> (pend<strong>in</strong>g). In prepar<strong>in</strong>g thatdocument, Dr. Dobbs used a multi-step process <strong>to</strong> critically evaluate andcompile evidence from a number of sources, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g research studies,consensus conference guidel<strong>in</strong>es and expert op<strong>in</strong>ion.The best available evidence for a medical condition depends on how muchresearch has been conducted on that condition and driv<strong>in</strong>g and the qualityof the research. Unfortunately, the impact of some medical conditions onthe functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g has not been studied or has not beenstudied <strong>in</strong> depth. A lack of evidence does not mean that the condition hasno impact. Rather, it simply means that the relevant research has not beenconducted. In each medical condition chapter, the evidence associat<strong>in</strong>gthe medical condition with an <strong>in</strong>creased crash risk or an impairment of thefunctions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g is clearly stated.In general, due <strong>to</strong> the variability <strong>in</strong> methodology and variability <strong>in</strong>outcome measures and statistical analyses, the evidence support<strong>in</strong>g arelationship between a medical condition and driv<strong>in</strong>g performance is based79


on a convergence of evidence across studies. For some medical conditionsthere is substantial data from well-designed studies that <strong>in</strong>dicate that thepresence of that condition negatively impacts on driv<strong>in</strong>g performance. Forother medical conditions, either the available literature is <strong>in</strong>sufficient ormethodological considerations are such that knowledge about the effect ofthe condition on driv<strong>in</strong>g performance is limited or unknown.9.3 Source of the medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>esThe medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es were drafted by OSMV, with review and<strong>in</strong>put from a variety of experts and stakeholders. Appendix 5 providesfurther details of the draft<strong>in</strong>g and approval process. Wherever possible,OSMV has <strong>in</strong>corporated current driver fitness research <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the medicalcondition guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>to</strong> ensure that they are based on the best evidencepossible. Nonetheless, because of the paucity of evidence for manymedical conditions, reliance on expert op<strong>in</strong>ion is a necessary componen<strong>to</strong>f the medical condition guidel<strong>in</strong>es.80


9.4 Medical condition chapter templateMedical conditionBACKGROUNDAbout the medical conditionThis section <strong>in</strong>cludes basic <strong>in</strong>formation about the medical condition. Correct term<strong>in</strong>ology isused.Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of the medical conditionPrevalence is the global occurrence of the condition. Incidence is the number of new casesannually.This <strong>in</strong>formation is <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>to</strong> highlight why the condition is of concern.The medical condition and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesThis section is where the evidence for regulat<strong>in</strong>g a particular condition is stated. Theresearch that supports regulat<strong>in</strong>g the condition is broadly reviewed. The focus is on thepattern of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs.Effect of the medical condition on functional ability <strong>to</strong> driveThis section <strong>in</strong>cludes a table that identifies the functions that the medical condition primarilyimpairs and whether the impairment is persistent or episodic. The table also lists theassessment <strong>to</strong>ols that OSMV may request for an <strong>in</strong>dividual with the identified medicalcondition. An example is shown on the follow<strong>in</strong>g page.81


ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessmentapproachPrimaryfunctionalabilityaffectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsXEpisodicimpairment:Medical assessment– likelihood ofimpairmentVariable –suddencognitive,mo<strong>to</strong>r orsensoryimpairment<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s reportXPersistentimpairment:FunctionalassessmentCognitive<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportMOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD, Trails Aor Trails B<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessmentCompensationThis section identifies whether or not a driver can compensate for the impairment caused bythe medical conditionGUIDELINESThis section outl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> table form the guidel<strong>in</strong>es used by OSMV <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e whether an<strong>in</strong>dividual with the identified medical condition is fit <strong>to</strong> drive.There may be multiple tables with<strong>in</strong> a particular chapter. Each table <strong>in</strong>dicates the medicalcondition(s) and licence class(es) <strong>to</strong> which the guidel<strong>in</strong>es presented <strong>in</strong> that table apply. Anexample is shown on the follow<strong>in</strong>g page.82


Private and commercial drivers who have XApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThis section expla<strong>in</strong>s who the guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong>.This section outl<strong>in</strong>es the assessments that OSMV may request iffurther <strong>in</strong>formation is required. The assessments listed are those thatare specific <strong>to</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual with the identified medical condition.Case managers and adjudica<strong>to</strong>rs should also refer <strong>to</strong> the generalpolicies conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> part 2 of the manual when decid<strong>in</strong>g theappropriate assessments <strong>to</strong> request, particularly where an <strong>in</strong>dividualhas multiple medical conditions or impairments.This section outl<strong>in</strong>es the general driver fitness guidel<strong>in</strong>es, e.g.:Individuals may drive if:Because the general driver fitness guidel<strong>in</strong>es are often written for abroad audience, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g physicians, OT’s and vision specialists,this section outl<strong>in</strong>es the guidel<strong>in</strong>es that OSMV will use operationally<strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e driver fitness. These guidel<strong>in</strong>es are written as:OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if:This section outl<strong>in</strong>es any conditions that OSMV will impose, byletter, on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who is found fit <strong>to</strong> drive.This section outl<strong>in</strong>es any restrictions that OSMV will impose on thelicence of an <strong>in</strong>dividual who is found fit <strong>to</strong> drive.This section outl<strong>in</strong>es OSMV’s re-assessment policy for <strong>in</strong>dividualswho are found fit <strong>to</strong> drive.This section expla<strong>in</strong>s the rationale for the policies outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> thetable. Where a general policy rationale applies <strong>to</strong> all of the guidel<strong>in</strong>eswith<strong>in</strong> a chapter, the policy rationale will be <strong>in</strong>cluded before thetables.83


Chapter 10: Medical Conditions at-a-GlanceFor each major medical condition identified <strong>in</strong> the medical condition chapters, the follow<strong>in</strong>gtable identifies: whether the result<strong>in</strong>g impairment is persistent or episodic what functions(s) are impaired, and whether the condition also commonly results <strong>in</strong> a lack of stam<strong>in</strong>a or general debility.The follow<strong>in</strong>g abbreviations are used <strong>in</strong> the table: “Cog” means cognitive “SI” means sudden <strong>in</strong>capacitation, and “GD” means general debility.Chapter and Condition Impairment Function impaired OtherPersistentEpi- Mo<strong>to</strong>r Cog Sensory All Sta-GDsodic– SI m<strong>in</strong>aSensorimo<strong>to</strong>rVision Hear<strong>in</strong>g11. Diabetes – Hypoglycemia X • •12. Peripheral arterial disease - X • •severe claudication12. AAA X •12. Aortic dissection X •12. DVT – Pulmonary embolism X •13. Musculoskeletal X •14. Renal diseases X • • •15. Respira<strong>to</strong>ry diseases X • • •16. Vestibular disorders X X • • •17. Cardiovascular diseases X X • •18. Hear<strong>in</strong>g loss X •19. Psychiatric disorders X •20. Cerebrovascular diseases X •21. Vision impairment X •22. Syncope X •23. Seizures and epilepsy X •24. MS, Cerebral Palsy,X • • •Park<strong>in</strong>son’s25. Traumatic bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>juries X X • • • • •26. Intracranial tumours X X • • • • •27. Cognitive impairment X•<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g dementia28. Sleep apnea X X • •28. Narcolepsy X X • •84


Chapter 11: Diabetes – HypoglycemiaBACKGROUND11.1 About diabetes and hypoglycemiaDiabetesDiabetes is a chronic and progressive disease characterized by hyperglycemia (high bloodglucose). It appears <strong>in</strong> two pr<strong>in</strong>cipal forms 3 : type 1 diabetes, formerly called <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) or juvenilediabetes, and type 2 diabetes, formerly called non-<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) or adul<strong>to</strong>nsetdiabetes.Type 1 diabetes can occur at any age, but it primarily appears before age 30. Type 2 diabetesusually occurs <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals over the age of 40. Type 1 and type 2 also differ <strong>in</strong> the underly<strong>in</strong>gdefect, and type of therapeutic control. Type 1 is characterized by the <strong>in</strong>ability <strong>to</strong> produce<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> and often more marked fluctuations <strong>in</strong> blood glucose. Daily <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>jections are alwaysrequired <strong>to</strong> manage type 1 diabetes. Type 2 diabetes is characterized by an impaired ability <strong>to</strong>recognize and utilize <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>, and eventually dim<strong>in</strong>ished <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> production. Therapeutic controloften is achieved by diet alone or <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with oral antihyperglycemic agents 4 , but peoplewith type 2 diabetes whose blood glucose cannot be controlled <strong>in</strong> this way require treatment with<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>.HypoglycemiaAnyone who requires treatment with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> is at risk of hypoglycemia. Those with type 2diabetes treated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> secretagogues (oral medications that stimulate the secretion of<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>) or metform<strong>in</strong> (an oral medication that enhances the effect of <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>) also mayexperience hypoglycemia, although the frequency with this treatment is lower than with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>.Hypoglycemia may occur for a number of reasons, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g reduced food <strong>in</strong>take, unusual levelof physical exertion, and alteration of <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> dose.Hypoglycemia can result <strong>in</strong> two types of symp<strong>to</strong>ms, neurogenic (au<strong>to</strong>nomic) andneuroglycopenic.3 Other types of diabetes <strong>in</strong>clude gestational diabetes, other specific types (those due <strong>to</strong> genetic defects <strong>in</strong> β-cellfunction, genetic defects <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> action, diseases of the exocr<strong>in</strong>e pancreas, drug or chemical <strong>in</strong>duced diabetes,etc.), and pre-diabetes. These types of diabetes are less common than type 1 and type 2 diabetes and are notdiscussed <strong>in</strong> this chapter.4 Oral antihyperglycemics also may be referred <strong>to</strong> as oral hypoglycemics.85


Neurogenic symp<strong>to</strong>ms of hypoglycemiaThe body’s immediate response <strong>to</strong> low blood sugar is <strong>to</strong> secrete hormones that counteract<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g adrenal<strong>in</strong>e. The presence of adrenal<strong>in</strong>e causes neurogenic (or au<strong>to</strong>nomic)symp<strong>to</strong>ms such as tremulousness, palpitations, anxiety, sweat<strong>in</strong>g, hunger, and paresthesias(t<strong>in</strong>gl<strong>in</strong>g and numbness). People with diabetes learn <strong>to</strong> recognize these symp<strong>to</strong>ms as evidence ofhypoglycemia and respond by consum<strong>in</strong>g sugary liquids or starchy foods <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease their bloodglucose level.Neuroglycopenic symp<strong>to</strong>ms of hypoglycemiaNeuroglycopenic symp<strong>to</strong>ms are the direct result of impaired bra<strong>in</strong> function due <strong>to</strong> low glucoselevels. These symp<strong>to</strong>ms <strong>in</strong>clude confusion, weakness or fatigue, severe cognitive failure, seizureand coma. As the blood glucose level falls, higher cortical function (<strong>in</strong>sight, judgment,calculation, speech and memory) is the first <strong>to</strong> be affected. Next, a person will experiencestupor, characterized by confusion, slurred speech, slow reaction times, poor judgment and lackof coord<strong>in</strong>ation. If the level cont<strong>in</strong>ues <strong>to</strong> fall, there will be loss of consciousness, seizures andpotentially bra<strong>in</strong> damage or death.Hypoglycemia unawarenessAnother complicat<strong>in</strong>g fac<strong>to</strong>r is hypoglycemia unawareness, which is the <strong>in</strong>ability <strong>to</strong> recognizethe au<strong>to</strong>nomic symp<strong>to</strong>ms of hypoglycemia or a failure of such warn<strong>in</strong>g signs <strong>to</strong> occur prior <strong>to</strong>impaired bra<strong>in</strong> function. If the <strong>in</strong>itial au<strong>to</strong>nomic symp<strong>to</strong>ms caused by the release of adrenal<strong>in</strong>eare missed, a person experienc<strong>in</strong>g hypoglycemia can only rely on the neuroglycopenic symp<strong>to</strong>msas an <strong>in</strong>dica<strong>to</strong>r of low blood glucose. Because these symp<strong>to</strong>ms appear <strong>in</strong> the context of cognitiveimpairment, they are not easily recognized by the hypoglycemic <strong>in</strong>dividual and may delay orprevent self-treatment.Severe hypoglycemiaSevere hypoglycemia is commonly def<strong>in</strong>ed as hypoglycemia that requires outside <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>to</strong>abort, or that produces an alteration <strong>in</strong> level of consciousness or loss of consciousness. Thealtered or reduced level of consciousness prevents a person experienc<strong>in</strong>g severe hypoglycemiafrom tak<strong>in</strong>g appropriate action.11.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of diabetes and hypoglycemiaDiabetesBased on research conducted by the National Diabetes Surveillance System, it is estimated thatapproximately 5% of Canadians aged 20 years and older have been diagnosed with diabetes.Diabetes is somewhat more prevalent <strong>in</strong> males, and the overall prevalence of diabetes <strong>in</strong>creaseswith age as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 1 below. It is estimated that 5 <strong>to</strong> 10% of diagnosed diabetes is type1, and 90 <strong>to</strong> 95% is type 2.86


PercentFigure 1 - Prevalence of Diabetes <strong>in</strong> Canada1614121086420WomenMenBoth20-39 years 40 - 59 years 60 - 74 years 75+ years 20+ yearsAge GroupHypoglycemiaA study of people with type 1 diabetes conducted <strong>in</strong> 1993 estimated that the <strong>in</strong>cidence of mildhypoglycemia (hypoglycemia for which a person is able <strong>to</strong> treat themselves) <strong>to</strong> be 28 episodesper person per year. The <strong>in</strong>cidence of severe hypoglycemia was estimated <strong>to</strong> be 0.31 episodesper person, per year. S<strong>in</strong>ce the mid 1990’s there has been an <strong>in</strong>creased therapeutic emphasis ontight glycemic control, which has been shown <strong>to</strong> significantly reduce the complications ofdiabetes. Unfortunately, the use of more <strong>in</strong>tensive treatment <strong>to</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> glycemic control has<strong>in</strong>creased the risk of hypoglycemia by as much as two or three times. This suggests that theseestimates on the prevalence of hypoglycemia <strong>in</strong> type 1 diabetes may be low.While people with type 2 diabetes who are treated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> are at risk of hypoglycemia, thefrequency is lower than for those with type 1 diabetes. The <strong>in</strong>cidence of severe hypoglycemiafor type 2 diabetes treated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> secretagogues is about 1 <strong>to</strong> 2% per year, with higher riskfor longer use, older age, and the use of chlorpropamide and other long-act<strong>in</strong>g secretagogues.The concomitant use of beta blockers and <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> previously has been thought <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease the riskof hypoglycemia; however, this theoretical concern is not often seen <strong>in</strong> practice.For anyone with diabetes, a his<strong>to</strong>ry of severe hypoglycemia, hypoglycemia unawareness, andlow blood glucose levels are consistent predic<strong>to</strong>rs of future hypoglycemia.Hypoglycemia unawarenessIt is estimated that 25% of all those treated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> will experience one or more episodes ofhypoglycemia unawareness. In type 1 diabetes, hypoglycemia unawareness <strong>in</strong>creases with theduration of diabetes and the likelihood <strong>in</strong>creases if au<strong>to</strong>nomic neuropathy is present. In type 2diabetes, hypoglycemia unawareness is relatively uncommon.87


Fac<strong>to</strong>rs that may be associated with hypoglycemia unawareness <strong>in</strong>clude older age, duration ofdiabetes, presence of au<strong>to</strong>nomic neuropathy, species of <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>, degree of metabolic control, andnumber of hypoglycemic events.11.3 Diabetes and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesAlthough there is some variability <strong>in</strong> results of research on drivers with diabetes, there is clearevidence <strong>to</strong> show that both private and commercial drivers with diabetes are at an <strong>in</strong>creased riskof mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle crashes.It has been shown that diabetes treatment modality is an important consideration <strong>in</strong>determ<strong>in</strong>ation of risk for drivers. Study results consistently <strong>in</strong>dicate that <strong>in</strong>dividuals tak<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> have an elevated risk of crashes. Some studies have also shown an elevated risk of crashfor drivers with type 2 diabetes who are treated with a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of oral antihyperglycemics(secretagogues and non-secretagogues). Those treated by diet alone or with a s<strong>in</strong>gle oralantihyperglycemic agent have shown no elevated risk of crash.A relationship between hypoglycemia and crashes has also been found. Despite a lack of datafrom studies of large samples of people with diabetes, a number of small studies have shown arelationship between hypoglycemic reactions and mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle crashes.While research has established clear l<strong>in</strong>ks between diabetes, hypoglycemia and mo<strong>to</strong>r vehiclecrashes, the variable results of these studies <strong>in</strong>dicate that decisions about driv<strong>in</strong>g should be basedon assessment of <strong>in</strong>dividual medical his<strong>to</strong>ry and circumstances <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: treatment modality <strong>in</strong>cidence of hypoglycemia <strong>in</strong>cidence of hypoglycemia unawareness, and presence of chronic complications of diabetes.11.4 Effect of diabetes and hypoglycemia on functional ability <strong>to</strong> driveFor <strong>in</strong>dividuals with diabetes, both acute and chronic complications of the disease may affectfitness <strong>to</strong> drive.Hyperglycemia may cause blurred vision, confusion, and eventually diabetic coma. For thepurposes of this manual, these are considered transient impairments.The neuroglycopenic symp<strong>to</strong>ms associated with severe hypoglycemia can significantly impairthe sensory, mo<strong>to</strong>r, and cognitive functions required for driv<strong>in</strong>g. There are studies that suggestthat mild hypoglycemia may also impair these functions.While it is clear that the risk of hypoglycemia is an important consideration when assess<strong>in</strong>g thefitness of drivers with diabetes, research <strong>in</strong>dicates that the chronic complications of diabetes aremore likely <strong>to</strong> be responsible for impaired fitness <strong>to</strong> drive than episodic <strong>in</strong>cidents ofhypoglycemia. Over time, people with diabetes often develop co-morbidities caused by theirprolonged exposure <strong>to</strong> hyperglycemia. These complications of diabetes <strong>in</strong>clude ret<strong>in</strong>opathy,88


neuropathy, nephropathy, cardiovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease. Therefore, theeffect of chronic complications always must be considered when assess<strong>in</strong>g fitness <strong>to</strong> drive forpeople with diabetes.ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessment approachPrimary functionalability affectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsSeverehypoglycemiaEpisodic impairment:Medical assessment –likelihood of impairmentAll – sudden<strong>in</strong>capacitation<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportDoc<strong>to</strong>r’s MedicalReport Re Diabetic<strong>Drive</strong>r<strong>Drive</strong>r’s DiabetesQuestionnaire11.5 CompensationAs severe hypoglycemia is an episodic impairment, a driver cannot compensate.89


GUIDELINES11.6 Private and commercial drivers with Type 2 diabetes that is not treated with<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> or <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> secretagoguesApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for private andcommercial drivers with Type 2 diabetes treated with diet and exercise aloneor comb<strong>in</strong>ed with: metform<strong>in</strong> (generic or under brand names Glucophage and Glumetza) acarbose (brand name Prandase) rosiglitazone (brand name Avandia), or pioglitazone (brand name Ac<strong>to</strong>s).OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.Individuals may drive if they: report <strong>to</strong> OSMV if they beg<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> therapy, and rema<strong>in</strong> under regular medical supervision <strong>to</strong> ensure that any progression<strong>in</strong> their condition or development of chronic complications does not gounattended.Individuals are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who is foundfit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV if you beg<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> therapy, and you must rema<strong>in</strong> under regular medical supervision <strong>to</strong> ensure that anyprogression <strong>in</strong> your condition or development of chronic complicationsdoes not go unattended.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess every five years, or <strong>in</strong> accordance with the schedule forrout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-related re-assessment.OSMV will re-assess if <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> or <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> secretagogue therapy is <strong>in</strong>itiated.<strong>Drive</strong>rs with diabetes who are not treated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> or <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>secretagogues are at little or no risk for hypoglycemia. Because diabetes is aprogressive condition, OSMV requires these drivers <strong>to</strong> rema<strong>in</strong> under medicalsupervision and undergo a re-assessment every five years.<strong>Drive</strong>rs who beg<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> therapy are required <strong>to</strong> report because of thesignificant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> risk for hypoglycemia associated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> therapy.The requirement <strong>to</strong> report is <strong>in</strong>tended <strong>to</strong> ensure that drivers on <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> therapymeet the more str<strong>in</strong>gent driver fitness guidel<strong>in</strong>es and conditions for driv<strong>in</strong>g.The requirement <strong>to</strong> report does not apply <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> secretagogue therapy.Although there is some <strong>in</strong>creased of hypoglycemia from the use of <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>secretagogues, the risk rema<strong>in</strong>s small <strong>in</strong> relation <strong>to</strong> the risk from <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>therapy.90


11.7 Private and commercial drivers with Type 2 diabetes that is treated with<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> secretagoguesApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for private andcommercial drivers with Type 2 diabetes treated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> secretagogues,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: glyburide (generic or under brand names DiaBeta and Euglucon) gliclazide (generic or under brand names Diamicron and Diamicron MR) glimpiride (brand name Amaryl) repagl<strong>in</strong>ide (brand name GlucoNorm), and nategl<strong>in</strong>ide (brand name Starlix).If the <strong>in</strong>dividual has had an episode of severe hypoglycemia with<strong>in</strong> the pastsix months, see the guidel<strong>in</strong>es for private drivers under 11.10 andcommercial drivers under 11.13.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.Individuals may drive if they: have a good understand<strong>in</strong>g of their condition rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their physician’s <strong>in</strong>structions about diet, medication,glucose moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g and the prevention of hypoglycemia rema<strong>in</strong> under regular medical supervision <strong>to</strong> ensure that any progression<strong>in</strong> their condition or development of chronic complications does not gounattended s<strong>to</strong>p driv<strong>in</strong>g and treat themselves immediately if hypoglycemia isidentified or suspected do not drive until a least 45 m<strong>in</strong>utes after effective treatment if theirblood glucose is between 2.5 and 4.0 mmol/L, and report <strong>to</strong> OSMV if they beg<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> therapyOSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if they: have a good understand<strong>in</strong>g of their condition, and rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their physician’s <strong>in</strong>structions about diet, medication,glucose moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g and the prevention of hypoglycemia.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who is foundfit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV if you beg<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> therapy you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician if you have an episode ofsevere hypoglycemia you must rema<strong>in</strong> under regular medical supervision <strong>to</strong> ensure that anyprogression <strong>in</strong> your condition or development of chronic complicationsdoes not go unattended you must s<strong>to</strong>p driv<strong>in</strong>g and treat yourself immediately if hypoglycemia isidentified or suspected, and you must not drive until at least 45 m<strong>in</strong>utes after effective treatment ifyour blood glucose is between 2.5 and 4.0 mmol/L.91


RestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleNo restrictions are required.For Commercial <strong>Drive</strong>rs, OSMV will re-assess annually.For Private <strong>Drive</strong>rs, if blood glucose levels and treatment are not stable,OSMV will re-assess annually until levels and treatment are stable. If bloodglucose levels and treatment are stable, OSMV will re-assess every five yearsor <strong>in</strong> accordance with the schedule for age related re-assessment.OSMV will re-assess if <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> or <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> secretagogue therapy is <strong>in</strong>itiated.<strong>Drive</strong>rs with diabetes who are treated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> secretagogues have somerisk for hypoglycemia, but this risk is still considerably lower than thatassociated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> therapy. To mitigate this risk, OSMV requires thatthese drivers understand the risk and follow their physician’s advice formoni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g their blood glucose and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g stability.As there is some risk for hypoglycemia, this poses additional conditionsregard<strong>in</strong>g how <strong>to</strong> avoid severe hypoglycemia while driv<strong>in</strong>g. Theseconditions are based on guidel<strong>in</strong>es published by the Canadian DiabetesAssociation.The rationale for the requirement <strong>to</strong> report <strong>to</strong> OSMV if they experiencesevere hypoglycemia or if they beg<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> therapy is <strong>to</strong> ensure that driverswho are at <strong>in</strong>creased risk meet the more str<strong>in</strong>gent driver fitness guidel<strong>in</strong>esand conditions for driv<strong>in</strong>g associated with severe hypoglycemia or <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>therapy. There is no requirement <strong>to</strong> report hypoglycemia unawarenessbecause it is highly unlikely <strong>to</strong> occur <strong>to</strong> a driver who is not treated with<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>.92


11.8 Private drivers with diabetes treated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>These guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes that is treated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>.ApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsIf the <strong>in</strong>dividual: has had an episode of severe hypoglycemia with<strong>in</strong> the past sixmonths, see the guidel<strong>in</strong>es under 11.10 has had an episode of hypoglycemia unawareness with<strong>in</strong> the pastyear, see the guidel<strong>in</strong>es under 11.11, or has persistent hypoglycemia unawareness, see the guidel<strong>in</strong>es under11.12.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.Individuals may drive if they: rema<strong>in</strong> under regular medical supervision <strong>to</strong> ensure that anyprogression <strong>in</strong> their condition or development of chroniccomplications does not go unattended understand their diabetic condition and the close <strong>in</strong>terrelationshipbetween <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> and diet and exercise rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their physician’s advice regard<strong>in</strong>g prevention andmanagement of hypoglycemia when on long drives, test their blood glucose concentrationimmediately before driv<strong>in</strong>g and approximately every 4 hours whiledriv<strong>in</strong>g, and have a source of readily available, rapidly absorbableglucose do not drive when their glucose level is below 4.0 mmol/L do not beg<strong>in</strong> <strong>to</strong> drive when their glucose level is between 4.0 and5.0 mmol/L unless they first take prophylactic carbohydratetreatment s<strong>to</strong>p driv<strong>in</strong>g and treat themselves immediately if hypoglycemia isidentified or suspected, and do not drive until a least 45 m<strong>in</strong>utes after effective treatment iftheir glucose is between 2.5 and 4.0 mmol/L.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if they: understand their diabetic condition and the close <strong>in</strong>terrelationshipbetween <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> and diet and exercise, and rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their physician’s advice regard<strong>in</strong>g prevention andmanagement of hypoglycemia.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must rema<strong>in</strong> under regular medical supervision <strong>to</strong> ensure that93


Conditions Cont’dRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleany progression <strong>in</strong> your condition or development of chroniccomplications does not go unattended you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician if you have anepisode of severe hypoglycemia or hypoglycemia unawareness when on long drives, you must test your blood glucoseconcentration immediately before driv<strong>in</strong>g and approximately every4 hours while driv<strong>in</strong>g, and have a source of readily available,rapidly absorbable glucose you must not drive when your glucose level is below 4.0 mmol/L you must not beg<strong>in</strong> <strong>to</strong> drive when your glucose level is between 4.0and 5.0 mmol/L unless you first take prophylactic carbohydratetreatment you must s<strong>to</strong>p driv<strong>in</strong>g and treat yourself immediately ifhypoglycemia is identified or suspected, and you must not drive until at least 45 m<strong>in</strong>utes after effectivetreatment if your blood glucose is between 2.5 and 4.0 mmol/L.No restrictions are required.If blood glucose levels and treatment are not stable, OSMV will reassessannually until levels and treatment are stable. If blood glucoselevels and treatment are stable, OSMV will re-assess every five years,or <strong>in</strong> accordance with the schedule for age-related re-assessment.<strong>Drive</strong>rs with diabetes who are treated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> therapy are at riskfor hypoglycemia. In addition <strong>to</strong> the conditions regard<strong>in</strong>g how <strong>to</strong>avoid severe hypoglycemia while driv<strong>in</strong>g that apply <strong>to</strong> drivers treatedwith <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> secretagogues, there are additional conditions forcheck<strong>in</strong>g and moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g blood glucose. These conditions are basedon guidel<strong>in</strong>es published by the Canadian Diabetes Association.The rationale for the requirement <strong>to</strong> report <strong>to</strong> OSMV if theyexperience severe hypoglycemia or hypoglycemia unawareness is <strong>to</strong>ensure that drivers who are at <strong>in</strong>creased risk meet the more str<strong>in</strong>gentdriver fitness guidel<strong>in</strong>es and conditions for driv<strong>in</strong>g associated withsevere hypoglycemia or hypoglycemia unawareness.94


11.9 Commercial drivers with diabetes treated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>These guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes that is treatedwith <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>.ApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>esIf the <strong>in</strong>dividual: has had an episode of severe hypoglycemia with<strong>in</strong> the past sixmonths, see the guidel<strong>in</strong>es under 11.13 has had an episode of hypoglycemia unawareness with<strong>in</strong> the pastyear, see the guidel<strong>in</strong>es under 11.14, or has persistent hypoglycemia unawareness, see the guidel<strong>in</strong>esunder 11.15.OSMV will request: a Doc<strong>to</strong>r’s Report on Commercial <strong>Drive</strong>r with Diabetes on Insul<strong>in</strong>completed by the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician (see a sample form <strong>in</strong> 11.16).To complete this form, the <strong>in</strong>dividual must have the results of anHbA 1 C test taken with<strong>in</strong> the previous 3 months. a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Report – Commercial <strong>Drive</strong>r with Diabetes on Insul<strong>in</strong>completed by the applicant (see a sample form <strong>in</strong> 1.17), and an Exam<strong>in</strong>ation of Visual Function form completed by anop<strong>to</strong>metrist or ophthalmologist, or the results of a visionexam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g test<strong>in</strong>g of visual fields completed with<strong>in</strong>the previous year.The <strong>in</strong>dividual must have available for the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician: records of medical care for the previous 24 months for <strong>in</strong>itialassessment and 12 months for re-assessment, and a log of blood glucose measurements performed at least twicedaily for the previous six months or s<strong>in</strong>ce diagnosis if diagnosedless than six months previous.<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esIndividuals may drive if: they obta<strong>in</strong> and reta<strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>itial certificate of competency <strong>in</strong> bloodglucose measurement from an approved diabetic cl<strong>in</strong>ic they carry the follow<strong>in</strong>g supplies whenever they are driv<strong>in</strong>g:o blood glucose self-moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g equipment, ando a source of readily available, rapidly absorbable glucose they test their blood glucose concentration 1 hour or less beforedriv<strong>in</strong>g and approximately every 4 hours while driv<strong>in</strong>g they do not beg<strong>in</strong> or cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> drive if their glucose level fallsbelow 6 mmol/L (108 mg/dL) and do not resume driv<strong>in</strong>g untiltheir glucose level has risen <strong>to</strong> 6.0 mmol/L or higher follow<strong>in</strong>gfood <strong>in</strong>gestion, and their work schedule has been approved by their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician95


as compatible with their <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> regimen.<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>escont’dOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsIndividuals may not drive if: blood tests <strong>in</strong>dicate uncontrolled diabetes; i.e.:o HbA1C > 12%, oro > 10% of BG levels 12%, oro > 10% of BG levels


RestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleNo restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess annually.Commercial drivers who are treated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> are at <strong>in</strong>creased riskof experienc<strong>in</strong>g hypoglycemia while driv<strong>in</strong>g. This is due <strong>to</strong> both theirhigh level of driv<strong>in</strong>g exposure and <strong>to</strong> the nature of driv<strong>in</strong>g task, whichmay make it more difficult for them <strong>to</strong> manage their blood glucose.The guidel<strong>in</strong>es and conditions are focused on ensur<strong>in</strong>g that thesedrivers have stable blood glucose and that understand their conditionand are able <strong>to</strong> effectively moni<strong>to</strong>r and manage their blood glucose.The rationale for the requirement <strong>to</strong> report <strong>to</strong> OSMV if theyexperience severe hypoglycemia or hypoglycemia unawareness is <strong>to</strong>ensure that drivers who are at <strong>in</strong>creased risk meet the more str<strong>in</strong>gentdriver fitness guidel<strong>in</strong>es and conditions for driv<strong>in</strong>g associated withsevere hypoglycemia or hypoglycemia unawareness.97


11.10 Private drivers who have an episode of severe hypoglycemiaApplicationAssessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMVdeterm<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have had an episode of severe hypoglycemia with<strong>in</strong> theprevious 6 months. If the episode was caused by hypoglycemiaunawareness, see the guidel<strong>in</strong>es under 11.11.<strong>Drive</strong>r fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations will be made by case managers.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request additional<strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.Individuals may drive if: their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician has <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>to</strong> OSMV that they have reestablishedstable glycemic control and OSMV has determ<strong>in</strong>ed thatthey are fit <strong>to</strong> resume driv<strong>in</strong>g. The period of time required <strong>to</strong> reestablishglycemic control will vary on a case-by-case basis. upon return <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g, they test their blood glucose immediatelybefore driv<strong>in</strong>g and approximately every hour while driv<strong>in</strong>g, and they do not beg<strong>in</strong> or cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> drive if their blood glucose levelfalls below 6.0 mmol/L and they do not resume driv<strong>in</strong>g until theirblood glucose level has risen above 6.0 mmol/L after food <strong>in</strong>gestionIf after six months there are no further episodes, they may cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong>drive if they follow the regular guidel<strong>in</strong>es for drivers with diabetes.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician<strong>in</strong>dicates that they have re-established stable glycemic control. Theperiod of time required <strong>to</strong> re-establish glycemic control will vary on acase-by-case basis.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician if you have an episodeof severe hypoglycemia for the next six months, you must test your blood glucoseconcentration immediately before driv<strong>in</strong>g and approximately everyhour while driv<strong>in</strong>g for the next six months, you must not drive, or you must s<strong>to</strong>pdriv<strong>in</strong>g, when your blood glucose level falls below 6.0 mmol/L andyou must not resume driv<strong>in</strong>g until your blood glucose level has risenabove 6.0 mmol/L after food <strong>in</strong>gestion.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess as recommended by the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician. Atthat time, if the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that there have been noepisodes of severe hypoglycemia with<strong>in</strong> the past six months, theapplicable guidel<strong>in</strong>es for private drivers with diabetes will apply.98


Policy rationaleSevere hypoglycemia <strong>in</strong>dicates a lack of glycemic control and thepotential for further hypoglycemic episodes. Once control isreestablished and driv<strong>in</strong>g resumes, more str<strong>in</strong>gent glucose moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>gguidel<strong>in</strong>es are required temporarily <strong>to</strong> mitigate the <strong>in</strong>creased risk ofhypoglycemia.99


11.11 Private drivers who have an episode of hypoglycemia unawarenessApplicationAssessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMVdeterm<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have had an episode of hypoglycemia unawareness with<strong>in</strong>the previous year. If the hypoglycemia unawareness is persistent (i.e.,the driver has not rega<strong>in</strong>ed awareness), see the guidel<strong>in</strong>es under 11.12.<strong>Drive</strong>r fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations will be made by case managers.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will requestadditional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.Individuals may not drive for a m<strong>in</strong>imum of 3 months after the episode.After 3 months, <strong>in</strong>dividuals may drive if: their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician has <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>to</strong> OSMV that they haverega<strong>in</strong>ed glycemic awareness and have stable glycemic control, and they follow the blood glucose moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g guidel<strong>in</strong>es for <strong>in</strong>dividualswith a his<strong>to</strong>ry of severe hypoglycemia.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least 3 months s<strong>in</strong>ce the episode of hypoglycemiaunawareness, and their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician has <strong>in</strong>dicated that they have rega<strong>in</strong>edglycemic awareness and have stable glycemic control.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician if you have an episodeof severe hypoglycemia or hypoglycemia unawareness you must test your blood glucose concentration immediately beforedriv<strong>in</strong>g and approximately every hour while driv<strong>in</strong>g, and you must not drive, or you must s<strong>to</strong>p driv<strong>in</strong>g, when your bloodglucose level falls below 6.0 mmol/L and you must not resumedriv<strong>in</strong>g until your blood glucose level has risen above 6.0 mmol/Lafter food <strong>in</strong>gestion.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> one year. At that time, if the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician<strong>in</strong>dicates that there have been no further episodes of hypoglycemiaunawareness with<strong>in</strong> the past year, the conditions listed above will beremoved and the applicable guidel<strong>in</strong>es for private drivers with diabeteswill apply.Hypoglycemia unawareness greatly <strong>in</strong>creases the risk for hypoglycemiawhile driv<strong>in</strong>g. These guidel<strong>in</strong>es require that glycemic awareness bereestablished before driv<strong>in</strong>g resumes. Once awareness and glucosestability are reestablished, more str<strong>in</strong>gent glucose moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g guidel<strong>in</strong>esare required temporarily <strong>to</strong> mitigate the <strong>in</strong>creased risk of hypoglycemia.100


11.12 Private drivers who have persistent hypoglycemia unawarenessApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have persistent hypoglycemia unawareness.<strong>Drive</strong>r fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations will be made by case managers.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request additional<strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.If 3 months after an episode an <strong>in</strong>dividual has persistenthypoglycemia unawareness, they may drive if: their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician has <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>to</strong> OSMV that they havestable glycemic control and are will<strong>in</strong>g and able <strong>to</strong> take steps <strong>to</strong>ensure they do not become hypoglycemic while driv<strong>in</strong>g they reta<strong>in</strong> a blood glucose log and review it with their treat<strong>in</strong>gphysician at <strong>in</strong>tervals the physician feels are necessary <strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>rcont<strong>in</strong>ued glycemic control, and they follow the blood glucose moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g guidel<strong>in</strong>es for<strong>in</strong>dividuals with a his<strong>to</strong>ry of severe hypoglycemia for as long astheir hypoglycemia unawareness persists.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least 3 months s<strong>in</strong>ce the last episode ofhypoglycemia unawareness, and their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have stable glycemiccontrol and are will<strong>in</strong>g and able <strong>to</strong> take steps <strong>to</strong> ensure they do notbecome hypoglycemic while driv<strong>in</strong>g.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician if you have anepisode of severe hypoglycemia or hypoglycemia unawareness you must reta<strong>in</strong> a blood glucose log and review it with theirtreat<strong>in</strong>g physician at <strong>in</strong>tervals the physician feels are necessary <strong>to</strong>moni<strong>to</strong>r cont<strong>in</strong>ued glycemic control you must test your blood glucose concentration immediatelybefore driv<strong>in</strong>g and approximately every hour while driv<strong>in</strong>g, and you must not drive, or you must s<strong>to</strong>p driv<strong>in</strong>g, when your bloodglucose level falls below 6.0 mmol/L and you must not resumedriv<strong>in</strong>g until your blood glucose level has risen above 6.0 mmol/Lafter food <strong>in</strong>gestion.No restrictions are required.101


OSMV will re-assess annually.Re-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleIf the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates on two consecutive annual reassessmentsthat: awareness has been rega<strong>in</strong>ed, and there have been no episodes of hypoglycemia unawareness with<strong>in</strong>the past yearthe conditions listed above will be removed and the applicableguidel<strong>in</strong>es for private drivers with diabetes will apply.Persistent hypoglycemia unawareness presents the greatest risk forhypoglycemia while driv<strong>in</strong>g. The guidel<strong>in</strong>es permit private drivers <strong>to</strong>cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> drive provided they are able <strong>to</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> stable bloodglucose and allows follow more str<strong>in</strong>gent glucose moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>grequirements.102


11.13 Commercial drivers who have an episode of severe hypoglycemiaApplicationAssessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMVdeterm<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for commercial driverswho have had an episode of severe hypoglycemia with<strong>in</strong> the previous 6months. If the episode was caused by hypoglycemia unawareness, see theguidel<strong>in</strong>es under 11.14.<strong>Drive</strong>r fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations will be made by case managers.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a Doc<strong>to</strong>r’s Report on Commercial <strong>Drive</strong>r with Diabetes on Insul<strong>in</strong>completed by the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician. To complete this form, the <strong>in</strong>dividualmust have the results of an HbA1C test taken with<strong>in</strong> the previous 3months, and a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Report – Commercial <strong>Drive</strong>r with Diabetes on Insul<strong>in</strong>completed by the applicant.Individuals may drive if: they have provided their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician with a blood glucose log of atleast 4 read<strong>in</strong>gs per day for 30 days, <strong>in</strong> which less than 5% of the read<strong>in</strong>gsare below 4.0 mmol/L their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician has <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>to</strong> OSMV that they have reestablishedstable glycemic control and OSMV has determ<strong>in</strong>ed that theyare fit <strong>to</strong> resume driv<strong>in</strong>g. The period of time required <strong>to</strong> re-establishglycemic control will vary on a case-by-case basis, and upon return <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g, they test their blood glucose immediately beforedriv<strong>in</strong>g and approximately every hour while driv<strong>in</strong>g, and do not drive iftheir blood glucose level is below 6.0 mmol/LIf after six months there are no further episodes, they may cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> drive ifthey follow the regular guidel<strong>in</strong>es for drivers with diabetes.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they have provided their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician with a blood glucose log of atleast 4 read<strong>in</strong>gs per day for 30 days, <strong>in</strong> which less than 5% of the read<strong>in</strong>gsare below 4.0 mmol/L, and their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician has <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>to</strong> OSMV that they have reestablishedstable glycemic control. The period of time required <strong>to</strong> reestablishglycemic control will vary on a case-by-case basis.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who is found fit<strong>to</strong> drive: you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician if you have an episode ofsevere hypoglycemia for the next six months, you must test your blood glucose concentrationimmediately before driv<strong>in</strong>g and approximately every hour while driv<strong>in</strong>g,and for the next six months you must not drive, or you must s<strong>to</strong>p driv<strong>in</strong>g, whenyour blood glucose level falls below 6.0 mmol/L and you must not resumedriv<strong>in</strong>g until your blood glucose level has risen above 6.0 mmol/L afterfood <strong>in</strong>gestion.103


RestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleNo restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess annually.Severe hypoglycemia <strong>in</strong>dicates a lack of glycemic control and the potential forfurther hypoglycemic episodes. Once control is re-established and driv<strong>in</strong>gresumes, more str<strong>in</strong>gent glucose moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g guidel<strong>in</strong>es are requiredtemporarily <strong>to</strong> mitigate the <strong>in</strong>creased risk of hypoglycemia.104


11.14 Commercial drivers who have an episode of hypoglycemia unawarenessApplicationAssessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong>guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMVdeterm<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for commercialdrivers who have had an episode of hypoglycemia unawareness with<strong>in</strong> theprevious year. If the hypoglycemia unawareness is persistent (i.e., the driverhas not rega<strong>in</strong>ed awareness), see the guidel<strong>in</strong>es under 11.15.<strong>Drive</strong>r fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations will be made by case managers.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a Doc<strong>to</strong>r’s Report on Commercial <strong>Drive</strong>r with Diabetes on Insul<strong>in</strong>completed by the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician. To complete this form, the<strong>in</strong>dividual must have the results of an HbA1C test taken with<strong>in</strong> theprevious 3 months, and a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Report – Commercial <strong>Drive</strong>r with Diabetes on Insul<strong>in</strong>completed by the applicant.Individuals who have experienced an episode of hypoglycemia unawarenessmay not drive for a m<strong>in</strong>imum of 3 months after the episode. After 3 months,they may drive if: they have provided their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician with a blood glucose log of atleast 4 read<strong>in</strong>gs per day for 30 days, <strong>in</strong> which less than 5% of theread<strong>in</strong>gs are below 4.0 mmol/L their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician has <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>to</strong> OSMV that they have rega<strong>in</strong>edglycemic awareness and have stable glycemic control, and OSMV hasdeterm<strong>in</strong>ed that they are fit <strong>to</strong> resume driv<strong>in</strong>g, and they follow the blood glucose moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g guidel<strong>in</strong>es for <strong>in</strong>dividuals witha his<strong>to</strong>ry of severe hypoglycemia.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least 3 months s<strong>in</strong>ce the episode of hypoglycemiaunawareness they have provided their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician with a blood glucose log of atleast 4 read<strong>in</strong>gs per day for 30 days, <strong>in</strong> which less than 5% of theread<strong>in</strong>gs are below 4.0 mmol/L, and their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician has <strong>in</strong>dicated that they have rega<strong>in</strong>ed glycemicawareness and have stable glycemic control.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who is foundfit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician if you have an episode ofsevere hypoglycemia or hypoglycemia unawareness you must test your blood glucose concentration immediately beforedriv<strong>in</strong>g and approximately every hour while driv<strong>in</strong>g, and you must not drive, or you must s<strong>to</strong>p driv<strong>in</strong>g, when your blood glucoselevel falls below 6.0 mmol/L and you must not resume driv<strong>in</strong>g until yourblood glucose level has risen above 6.0 mmol/L after food <strong>in</strong>gestion.105


RestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleNo restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> one year. At that time, if the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician<strong>in</strong>dicates that there have been no episodes of hypoglycemia unawarenesswith<strong>in</strong> the past year, the conditions listed above will be removed and theapplicable guidel<strong>in</strong>es for commercial drivers with diabetes will apply.Hypoglycemia unawareness greatly <strong>in</strong>creases the risk for hypoglycemiawhile driv<strong>in</strong>g. These guidel<strong>in</strong>es require that glycemic awareness bereestablished before driv<strong>in</strong>g resumes. Once awareness glucose is stability isreestablished, more str<strong>in</strong>gent glucose moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g guidel<strong>in</strong>es are requiredtemporarily <strong>to</strong> mitigate the <strong>in</strong>creased risk of hypoglycemia.106


11.15 Commercial drivers who have persistent hypoglycemia unawarenessApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers who have persistent hypoglycemia unawareness.OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.Individuals may not drive.Individuals are not fit <strong>to</strong> drive.N/AN/AN/APersistent hypoglycemia unawareness presents the greatest risk forhypoglycemia while driv<strong>in</strong>g. Given the <strong>in</strong>creased driv<strong>in</strong>g exposureassociated with commercial driv<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dividuals who have persistenthypoglycemia unawareness are not fit <strong>to</strong> drive.107


11.16 Doc<strong>to</strong>r’s report on commercial driver with diabetes on <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>Office of the Super<strong>in</strong>tenden<strong>to</strong>f Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicleswww.pssg.gov.bc.ca/osmvPO BOX 9254 STNPROV GOVTVICTORIA <strong>BC</strong> V8W 9J2Phone: (250) 387-7747Fax: (250) 952-6888DOCTOR’S REPORT ON COMMERCIAL DRIVER WITH DIABETES ON INSULINNOTE TO THE DOCTOR: on a separate form, the driver has certified that they will: ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a glycemic log which shows the previous 6 months and records the hours driven and blood glucose checks dur<strong>in</strong>g that time produce their glycemic log for their doc<strong>to</strong>r’s review when they attend for completion of this form make available records of medical care for the previous 24 months for <strong>in</strong>itial diabetes assessment, and 12 months for re-assessmentPERSONAL HEALTH NUMBER(MUST BE COMPLETED) MSP Fee Code 96222The personal <strong>in</strong>formation on this form is collected under the authority of the Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicle Act, Medicare Protection Act, and the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. The<strong>in</strong>formation provided will be used <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e your fitness <strong>to</strong> drive a mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle and allow the physician <strong>to</strong> bill through the British Columbia Medical Services Plan for the service. Personal<strong>in</strong>formation is protected from unauthorized use and disclosure <strong>in</strong> accordance with the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and may be disclosed only as provided by that Act.If you have any questions about the collection, use and disclosure of the <strong>in</strong>formation collected, contact the Office of the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles at (250) 387-7747.PART A- GENERAL1. Patient’s name 7. Has there been a significant change <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>therapy, i.e. <strong>in</strong>troduction of <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>, or a change <strong>in</strong>type of <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> or number of <strong>in</strong>jections? YES NO2. Age when diagnosed Commercial drivers must present a log of bloodglucose measurements performed at least twice dailyfor the previous six months, or s<strong>in</strong>ce diagnoses ifdiagnosed <strong>in</strong> the last 6 months, <strong>to</strong> their exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gphysician.3. How long have you treated this patient for diabetes? 8a. Does the log <strong>in</strong>dicate adequate self-moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g ofblood glucose? YES NO4. Result of one HbA1c completed with<strong>in</strong> the last three months.Value:5. Does patient have a full understand<strong>in</strong>g of the diabeticcondition and the relationship between <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> dose, diet andexercise? YES NO6. Has impairment by alcohol ever <strong>in</strong>terfered with patient’sability <strong>to</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> good control of their diabetes? YES NO8b. Does the data <strong>in</strong> this patient’s log <strong>in</strong>dicate stableand effective blood glucose control? YES NO9. Does patient take appropriate action based on bloodglucose results? YES NO10. Is this patient’s work schedule compatible withtheir treatment regime? YES NO108


PART B – HYPOGLYCEMIA11a. Has the patient had any hypoglycemic reactions dur<strong>in</strong>g thepast six months of which you are aware? NO YES11b. If “yes”, <strong>in</strong>dicate the date(s) and type(s) of treatment (i.e. selftreated, treated by another person or by a medical professional12a. Does patient have hypoglycemia unawareness? NO YES12b. If “yes” describe fully13. Does the glycemic log <strong>in</strong>dicate that > 10% of BGlevels


11.17 <strong>Drive</strong>r’s report – commercial driver with diabetes on <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>Office of the Super<strong>in</strong>tenden<strong>to</strong>f Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicleswww.pssg.gov.bc.ca/osmvPO BOX 9254 STNPROV GOVTVICTORIA <strong>BC</strong> V8W 9J2Phone: (250) 387-7747Fax: (250) 952-6888The personal <strong>in</strong>formation on this form is collected under the authority of the Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicle Act (RS<strong>BC</strong> 1996, c.318, s. 29) and the Freedom of Information andProtection of Privacy Act (RS<strong>BC</strong> 1996, c.165, s26(b) & s. 27(1)(c). The <strong>in</strong>formation provided will be used <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e your fitness <strong>to</strong> drive a mo<strong>to</strong>r ve hicle. If youhave any questions about the collection, use and disclosure of the <strong>in</strong>formation collected, contact the Office of the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Ve hicles at (250) 387-7747DRIVER’S REPORT – COMMERCIAL DRIVER WITH DIABETES ON INSULIN<strong>Drive</strong>r’s Name DL # Date Issued1. Can you recognize a hypoglycemic reaction when it occurs? YES NO2. Please list the symp<strong>to</strong>ms you would experience dur<strong>in</strong>g a hypoglycemic reaction:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________3. How would you treat a hypoglycemic reaction?_____________________________________________________________________________4. Do you carry food and glucose (sugar) on your person? YES NO5. In the last year have you had a hypoglycemic reaction where you lost consciousness or where yourequired assistance of another person <strong>to</strong> treat the hypoglycemia? YES NOIf yes describe: _________________________________________________________________6. In the last year have you had an episode of hypoglycemic unawareness? YES NOIf yes describe: _________________________________________________________________DRIVER’S CERTIFICATION:I agree that while I hold a British Columbia class 1, 2, 3, or 4 driver’s licence, I will:Carry blood glucose moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g equipment and a source of readily available, rapidly absorbable glucoseCheck my blood glucose with<strong>in</strong> 1 hour or less before driv<strong>in</strong>g and approximately every 4 hours whiledriv<strong>in</strong>gNot drive when my blood glucose is less than 6 mmol/L. and I will not resume driv<strong>in</strong>g until my bloodglucose levels have risen <strong>to</strong> 6.0mmol/L or higher follow<strong>in</strong>g food <strong>in</strong>gestionMake available <strong>to</strong> my doc<strong>to</strong>r records of medical care for the previous 24 months for <strong>in</strong>itial assessment and12 months for re-assessment, andMa<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a log of blood glucose measurements performed at least twice daily for the previous six monthsor s<strong>in</strong>ce diagnosis if diagnosed less than six months previous, andRecord the hours driven and blood glucose checks dur<strong>in</strong>g that time <strong>in</strong> the glycemic log, and110


Produce my glycemic log for my doc<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> review when I attend for completion of the diabetic packageforms provided <strong>to</strong> me by OSMV.Obta<strong>in</strong> and reta<strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>itial certificate of competency <strong>in</strong> blood glucose measurement from anapproved diabetic teach<strong>in</strong>g cl<strong>in</strong>icI acknowledge that failure <strong>to</strong> produce my certificate of competence and glycemic log <strong>to</strong> my doc<strong>to</strong>r onrequest may result <strong>in</strong> cancellation of my driver’s licence.1) I CERTIFY THAT THE STATEMENTS IN THIS REPORT ARE TRUE ANDCOMPLETE AND THAT THE INFORMATION THAT I HAVE GIVEN TO THEPHYSICIAN TO COMPLETE THE DOCTOR’S REPORT ON COMMERCIAL DRIVERWITH DIABETES ON INSULIN REPORT IS TRUE AND COMPLETE.2) I UNDERSTAND THAT INACCURATE, MISLEADING, MISSING OR FALSEINFORMATION MAY LEAD TO DENIAL OR CANCELATION OF MY DRIVER’SLICENCE.3) I AUTHORIZE THE RELEASE OF ALL REPORTS FROM MEDICAL SPECIALIST(S)PERTAINING TO DISEASE, DISABILITIES AND CONDITIONS THAT MAY AFFECTDRIVING TO THE ( OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES.SIGNATURE:TELEPHONENO.:ADDRESS:DATE:111


Chapter 12:Peripheral Vascular DiseasesBACKGROUND12.1 About peripheral vascular diseasesThe term peripheral vascular diseases (PVDs) refers <strong>to</strong> circula<strong>to</strong>ry disorders <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g any of theblood vessels outside the heart, e.g. arteries, ve<strong>in</strong>s, and lymphatics of the peripheral vasculature.The four subcategories of PVDs that have the greatest relevance for driv<strong>in</strong>g are: peripheral arterial disease aneurysms dissections, and deep-ve<strong>in</strong> thrombosis.Peripheral arterial diseasePeripheral arterial disease (PAD) is characterized by partial or complete failure of the arterialsystem <strong>to</strong> deliver oxygenated blood <strong>to</strong> peripheral tissue. Atherosclerosis is the primaryunderly<strong>in</strong>g cause of PAD. Other causes <strong>in</strong>clude thrombembolic, <strong>in</strong>flamma<strong>to</strong>ry, or aneurismaldisease. Although PAD can affect both upper and lower extremities, lower extremity<strong>in</strong>volvement is more common. A large majority (70% <strong>to</strong> 80%) of <strong>in</strong>dividuals with PAD areasymp<strong>to</strong>matic. For those <strong>in</strong>dividuals who are symp<strong>to</strong>matic, symp<strong>to</strong>ms can progress from<strong>in</strong>termittent claudication (pa<strong>in</strong> while walk<strong>in</strong>g) <strong>to</strong> rest/nocturnal pa<strong>in</strong>, <strong>to</strong> necrosis/gangrene. Only1% <strong>to</strong> 2%, however, progress <strong>to</strong> limb amputation with<strong>in</strong> 5 years of the orig<strong>in</strong>al diagnosis.AneurysmsAn aneurysm is def<strong>in</strong>ed as a localized abnormal dilation of an artery by 50% above the normalsize. Although an aneurysm can form on any blood vessel, abdom<strong>in</strong>al aortic aneurysms (AAA)are most common, with 90% occurr<strong>in</strong>g below the renal arteries. Others <strong>in</strong>clude those occurr<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> the thoracic aorta (ascend<strong>in</strong>g 5%; aortic arch 5%; descend<strong>in</strong>g 13%), those <strong>in</strong> the comb<strong>in</strong>edthoracic and abdom<strong>in</strong>al aorta (14%), and iliac aneurysms (isolated 1%: comb<strong>in</strong>ed abdom<strong>in</strong>al andiliac 13%).Aortic dissectionAortic dissection is a different disease <strong>to</strong> aortic aneurysm. Most dissections are <strong>in</strong> apparentlynormal aortas, are sudden and often present with collapse. Apart from some congenitalconditions which predispose <strong>to</strong> dissections e.g. Marfan’s, there is no way <strong>to</strong> predict an aorticdissection.112


Deep-ve<strong>in</strong> thrombosisDeep-ve<strong>in</strong> thrombosis (DVT) occurs when a thrombus (blood clot) forms with<strong>in</strong> a deep-ve<strong>in</strong>,most commonly <strong>in</strong> the calf. Three ma<strong>in</strong> fac<strong>to</strong>rs (known as Virchow's triad) can contribute <strong>to</strong>deep-ve<strong>in</strong> thrombosis: <strong>in</strong>jury <strong>to</strong> the ve<strong>in</strong>'s l<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, an <strong>in</strong>creased tendency for blood <strong>to</strong> clot, andslow<strong>in</strong>g of blood flow.12.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of peripheral vascular diseasesPeripheral arterial diseaseEstimates of the prevalence of PAD depend on populations studied and study methodology. Thegeneral prevalence rate is reported <strong>to</strong> be 10%. However, because most <strong>in</strong>dividuals rema<strong>in</strong>asymp<strong>to</strong>matic, the true overall prevalence rate is likely <strong>to</strong> be considerably higher. Theprevalence of PAD <strong>in</strong>creases with age and with prolonged exposure <strong>to</strong> smok<strong>in</strong>g, hypertension,and diabetes.Recent studies <strong>in</strong>dicate that PAD affects approximately 20% of adults 55 years of age and olderand an estimated 27 million persons <strong>in</strong> North America and Europe. Intermittent claudication isthe most common symp<strong>to</strong>m associated with PAD. The prevalence of <strong>in</strong>termittent claudication<strong>in</strong>creases dramatically with age. The <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>in</strong> the general population is less than 1% thoseunder the age of 55, and <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>to</strong> 5% for those 55 <strong>to</strong> 74 years of age. At younger ages, theprevalence rate is almost twice as high for males as for females, but at the older ages, thedifference between males and females is reduced. Risk fac<strong>to</strong>rs for PAD are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1.Table 1Individuals at-risk for Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease 5Age less than 50 years, with diabetes and one other atherosclerosis risk fac<strong>to</strong>r (smok<strong>in</strong>g,dyslipidemia, hypertension, or hyperhomocyste<strong>in</strong>emia)Age 50 <strong>to</strong> 69 years and his<strong>to</strong>ry of smok<strong>in</strong>g or diabetesAge 70 years and olderLeg symp<strong>to</strong>ms with exertion (suggestive of claudication) or ischemic rest pa<strong>in</strong>Abnormal lower extremity pulse exam<strong>in</strong>ationKnown atherosclerotic coronary, carotid, or renal artery diseaseAbdom<strong>in</strong>al aortic aneurysmsBased on results from a population-based study completed <strong>in</strong> 2001, the prevalence of abdom<strong>in</strong>alaortic aneurysms is approximately 9% for males and 2.2% for females. Prevalence <strong>in</strong>creases5 Reproduced, with permission from Hirsch, Haskal, Hertzer et al.. ACC/AHA guidel<strong>in</strong>es for the Management ofPatients With Peripheral Arterial Disease (Lower Extremity, Renal, Mesenteric, and Abdom<strong>in</strong>al Aortic): ExecutiveSummary. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Available at:http://www.acc.org/clnical/guidel<strong>in</strong>es/pad/summary.pdf113


with age and is higher <strong>in</strong> close family relatives of those affected. Prevalence also is higher <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals with cardiovascular risk fac<strong>to</strong>rs such as cigarette smok<strong>in</strong>g, hypertension, andhypercholesterolemia.Deep-ve<strong>in</strong> thrombosisThe prevalence of DVT is estimated <strong>to</strong> be < 0.005% <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals less than 15 years of age, and<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>to</strong> approximately 0.5% for <strong>in</strong>dividuals 80 years of age and older. Approximately onethirdof patients with symp<strong>to</strong>matic DVT will develop a pulmonary embolism, which is theobstruction of the pulmonary artery or a branch of it lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the lungs by a blood clot.12.3 Peripheral vascular diseases and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesThere are no studies that consider a relationship between peripheral vascular diseases and risk ofcrash.12.4 Effect of peripheral vascular diseases on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drivePeripheral arterial diseaseFor <strong>in</strong>dividuals with peripheral arterial disease, the chronic outcomes of the disease will rarelyaffect fitness <strong>to</strong> drive. The symp<strong>to</strong>ms of lower extremity PAD such as coldness or numbness <strong>in</strong>the foot or <strong>to</strong>es, and <strong>in</strong> the later stages, pa<strong>in</strong> while the extremity is at rest, may affect the sensoryand mo<strong>to</strong>r functions required for driv<strong>in</strong>g.In general, the degree of impact will be determ<strong>in</strong>ed by disease severity. For example, <strong>in</strong>dividualswho are asymp<strong>to</strong>matic or have mild <strong>to</strong> moderate claudication are unlikely <strong>to</strong> have symp<strong>to</strong>ms thatwould affect driv<strong>in</strong>g. Individuals whose disease has progressed <strong>to</strong> the severe claudication stageor higher may have functional impairment sufficient <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>terfere with the lower extremitydemands of operat<strong>in</strong>g a mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle (e.g., awareness of foot placement, pedal pressure, mo<strong>to</strong>rstrength, etc.).Abdom<strong>in</strong>al aortic aneurysm and aortic dissectionFor <strong>in</strong>dividuals with an abdom<strong>in</strong>al aortic aneurysm, acute complications may affect fitness <strong>to</strong>drive. The primary concern with an abdom<strong>in</strong>al aortic aneurysm is the risk of rupture. Themajority of aneurysms are asymp<strong>to</strong>matic and research suggests that there are few or nosymp<strong>to</strong>ms prior <strong>to</strong> rupture. There is limited data on the immediate functional outcomes ofrupture (e.g. loss of consciousness). In the absence of firm data, it is assumed that most<strong>in</strong>dividuals experienc<strong>in</strong>g a rupture lose consciousness almost immediately. As with AAA, theprimary concern for an <strong>in</strong>dividual with an aortic dissection is the risk of rupture.Size and rate of expansion of abdom<strong>in</strong>al aortic aneurysms and aortic dissections are determ<strong>in</strong>edby sequential CT or Ultrasound imag<strong>in</strong>g. Only the anterior-posterior or transverse diameter ispredictive of rupture; the length of the aneurysm has no relation <strong>to</strong> rupture.114


Aneurysms less than 5 cm <strong>in</strong> diameter have an annual <strong>in</strong>cidence of rupture of 4.1%, which<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>to</strong> 6.6% <strong>in</strong> aneurysms between 5 and 5.7 cm. Aneurysms larger than 7 cm <strong>in</strong> diameterhave 19 percent per year <strong>in</strong>cidence of rupture. This means that most patients (75%) with thissize of aneurysm will have a rupture with<strong>in</strong> 5 years.Surgical repair is considered where an aneurysm is greater than 5.5 cm. A recent study suggeststhat women’s aneurysms rupture at smaller sizes, lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the conclusion that the 5.5 cmthreshold for surgical repair is likely <strong>to</strong>o large for women and 5 cm has been suggested as theappropriate level.Deep-ve<strong>in</strong> thrombosisFor <strong>in</strong>dividuals with deep-ve<strong>in</strong> thrombosis (DVT), acute complications may affect fitness <strong>to</strong>drive. The primary concern with DVT is the risk of sudden <strong>in</strong>capacitation due <strong>to</strong> a pulmonaryembolism.ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessment approachPrimary functionalability affectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsPeripheralarterialdisease –severeclaudicationPersistent Impairment:Functional assessmentSensorimo<strong>to</strong>rMo<strong>to</strong>r<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s reportIC<strong>BC</strong> Road testFunctional assessment byan occupational therapis<strong>to</strong>r driver rehabilitationspecialistAbdom<strong>in</strong>alaorticaneurysmEpisodic impairment:Medical assessment –likelihood of impairmentAll – sudden<strong>in</strong>capacitation<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s reportAorticdissectionEpisodic impairment:Medical assessment –likelihood of impairmentAll – sudden<strong>in</strong>capacitation<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s reportDVT - mayresult <strong>in</strong>pulmonaryembolismEpisodic impairment:Medical assessment –likelihood of impairmentAll – sudden<strong>in</strong>capacitation<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s report115


12.5 CompensationIndividuals are not able <strong>to</strong> compensate for the effects of an AAA, aortic dissection or DVT.Individuals with an amputation result<strong>in</strong>g from PAD may be able <strong>to</strong> compensate for functionalimpairment through strategies and/or vehicle modifications.StrategiesFor loss of limb, an <strong>in</strong>dividual may compensate through the use of a prosthetic device whendriv<strong>in</strong>g.Vehicle modificationsIndividuals with PAD may be able <strong>to</strong> compensate for a functional impairment by driv<strong>in</strong>g avehicle that has been modified <strong>to</strong> address their impairment. Compensa<strong>to</strong>ry vehicle modificationscan <strong>in</strong>clude modifications <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g controls (e.g. hand controlled throttle and brake).An occupational therapist, driver rehabilitation specialist, driver exam<strong>in</strong>er or other medicalprofessional may recommend specific compensa<strong>to</strong>ry vehicle modifications based on an<strong>in</strong>dividual functional assessment.116


GUIDELINES12.6 Private and commercial drivers with peripheral arterial diseaseApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have peripheral arterial disease. If an<strong>in</strong>dividual has lost a limb due <strong>to</strong> peripheral arterial disease, also seethe guidel<strong>in</strong>es under 13.6.If further <strong>in</strong>formation on an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that the <strong>in</strong>dividual has: severe claudication, or foot and leg symp<strong>to</strong>ms that may impair their functional ability <strong>to</strong>driveOSMV will request an IC<strong>BC</strong> road test.If an IC<strong>BC</strong> driver exam<strong>in</strong>er recommends further assessment, OSMVmay request: additional <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medicalcondition, and/or an assessment from an occupational therapist or driverrehabilitation specialist.Individuals may drive if the peripheral arterial disease is successfullytreated.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician does not <strong>in</strong>dicate severe claudication orfoot and leg symp<strong>to</strong>ms that may impair their functional ability <strong>to</strong>drive, or where their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician does <strong>in</strong>dicate severe claudication orfoot and leg symp<strong>to</strong>ms that may impair their functional ability <strong>to</strong>drive, a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have thefunctional ability required for their class of licence held.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.117


Re-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleFor private drivers, OSMV will re-assess every 5 years if successfullytreated or mild claudication. OSMV may re-assess more frequently,upon the recommendation of the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, if moderate orsevere claudication.For commercial drivers, rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial re-assessment applies,unless more frequent re-assessment is recommended by the treat<strong>in</strong>gphysician.Where peripheral arterial diseases results <strong>in</strong> a functional impairment,the impact of the impairment on driv<strong>in</strong>g should be determ<strong>in</strong>ed by an<strong>in</strong>dividual functional assessment.118


12.7 Private drivers who have an aneurysm or dissectionApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have either: an abdom<strong>in</strong>al aortic aneurysm, or a medically treated aortic dissection.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, such as areport from with<strong>in</strong> the past year <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the diameter of theaneurysm or dissection.An <strong>in</strong>dividual may not drive if their aortic aneurysm is at the stage ofimm<strong>in</strong>ent rupture as determ<strong>in</strong>ed by size, location or recent change.Men may drive if: the diameter of the aneurysm or dissection is < 6.5 cm, and their condition is regularly reviewed.Women may drive if: the diameter of the aneurysm or dissection is < 6 cm, and their condition is regularly reviewed.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d men fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the diameter of the aneurysm or dissection is < 6.5 cm, and their condition is regularly reviewed.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d women fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the diameter of the aneurysm or dissection is < 6 cm, and their condition is regularly reviewed.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If the diameter of the aneurysm or dissection is over 5 cm, OSMVwill re-assess annually. If the diameter is between 4 and 5 cm,OSMV will re-assess every two years. If the diameter is under 4 cm,OSMV will re-assess every 5 years, unless rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related reassessmentapplies.The primary driver fitness concern with AAA and aortic dissection isthe risk of rupture. The risk of rupture <strong>in</strong>creases with the size of theaneurysm. The size threshold for driv<strong>in</strong>g fitness for private drivershas been set as just over the po<strong>in</strong>t at which surgery <strong>to</strong> repair theaneurysm or dissection is generally considered advisable given therisk of rupture.119


12.8 Private and commercial drivers who have had surgery for an aneurysm ordissectionApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have either: had surgery <strong>to</strong> repair an abdom<strong>in</strong>al aortic aneurysm, or had surgical treatment for an aortic dissection.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physicianIf any complications from the surgery are <strong>in</strong>dicated, the driver fitnessdeterm<strong>in</strong>ation will be made by a case manager. In this situation, iffurther <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV may request a report from thevascular surgeonIndividuals who have had surgery <strong>to</strong> repair an abdom<strong>in</strong>al aorticaneurysm may drive.Individuals with a surgically treated dissection may drive with thesupport of the vascular surgeon.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the abdom<strong>in</strong>al aortic aneurysm has been surgically repairedthe aortic dissection has been surgically treated, and the treat<strong>in</strong>gphysician supports a return <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>gNo conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will not re-assess, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or agerelatedre-assessmentThe primary driver fitness concern with AAA and aortic dissection isthe risk of rupture. Successful surgery <strong>to</strong> repair an aneurysm ordissection will significantly reduce the risk of rupture.120


12.9 Commercial drivers who have an aneurysm or dissectionApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers who have either: an abdom<strong>in</strong>al aortic aneurysm, or a medically treated aortic dissection.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, such as areport from with<strong>in</strong> the past year <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the diameter of theaneurysm or dissection.An <strong>in</strong>dividual may not drive if their aortic aneurysm is at the stage ofimm<strong>in</strong>ent rupture as determ<strong>in</strong>ed by size, location or recent change.Men may drive if: the aneurysm or dissection is < 6 cm, and their condition is regularly reviewed.Women may drive if: the aneurysm or dissection is < 5.5 cm, and their condition is regularly reviewed.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d men fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the aneurysm or dissection is < 6 cm, and their condition is regularly reviewed.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d women fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the aneurysm or dissection is < 5.5 cm, and their condition is regularly reviewed.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If the diameter of the aneurysm or dissection is over 4 cm, OSMVwill re-assess annually. If the diameter is between 3 and 4 cm,OSMV will re-assess every two years. If the diameter is under 3 cm,OSMV will re-assess every 3 years.The primary driver fitness concern with AAA and aortic dissection isthe risk of rupture. The risk of rupture <strong>in</strong>creases with the size of theaneurysm. The size threshold for driv<strong>in</strong>g fitness for commercial hasbeen set as the po<strong>in</strong>t at which surgery <strong>to</strong> repair the aneurysm ordissection is generally considered advisable given the risk of rupture.This threshold is lower than the threshold for private drivers <strong>to</strong> reflectthe additional risk presented by the <strong>in</strong>creased driv<strong>in</strong>g exposure forcommercial drivers.121


12.10 Private and commercial drivers who have deep-ve<strong>in</strong> thrombosisApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have deep-ve<strong>in</strong> thrombosis.OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.An <strong>in</strong>dividual may not drive if they have acute DVT that is untreated.An <strong>in</strong>dividual with DVT may drive if: they are be<strong>in</strong>g treated with an anticoagulant, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician states that treatment is effective.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they are be<strong>in</strong>g treated with an anticoagulant, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician states that treatment is effective.An <strong>in</strong>dividual may not drive if they have acute DVT that is untreated.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will not re-assess, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or agerelatedre-assessmentThe primary concern with DVT is the risk of sudden <strong>in</strong>capacitationdue <strong>to</strong> a pulmonary embolism. Acute DVT that is untreated is atransient impairment. Once treated, OSMV will f<strong>in</strong>d the <strong>in</strong>dividualfit <strong>to</strong> drive.122


Chapter 13: Musculoskeletal ConditionsBACKGROUND13.1 About musculoskeletal conditionsThis chapter is concerned with diseases or <strong>in</strong>juries that have a persistent impact on themusculoskeletal system. Musculoskeletal refers <strong>to</strong> the system of muscles, tendons, ligaments,bones, jo<strong>in</strong>ts, cartilage and other connective tissues. The musculoskeletal system is responsiblefor body movement and stability. Examples of chronic musculoskeletal conditions that mayhave a persistent impact on driv<strong>in</strong>g are: diseases of the jo<strong>in</strong>ts, e.g. rheuma<strong>to</strong>id arthritis and osteoarthritis disabilities of the sp<strong>in</strong>e, e.g. degenerative disc disease or permanent <strong>in</strong>juries deformity, e.g. scoliosis, and loss of limb.Some musculoskeletal conditions, or procedures <strong>to</strong> treat the conditions, may result <strong>in</strong> temporaryimpairment of the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g fractures, temporary braces andcasts, hip and knee replacements, and various orthopedic surgeries. These are consideredtransient impairments.13.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of musculoskeletal conditionsStatistics on the prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of musculoskeletal conditions <strong>in</strong> general are difficult<strong>to</strong> obta<strong>in</strong> because of the broadness of the category and the diversity of conditions with<strong>in</strong> thecategory. Research suggests that musculoskeletal conditions are a lead<strong>in</strong>g cause of pa<strong>in</strong> andphysical disability. In Canada, the Ontario Health Survey (1994) found that musculoskeletalconditions are responsible for 54% of all long-term disability, 40% of all chronic conditions, and24% of all restricted activity days. A study <strong>in</strong> the United States found that the lead<strong>in</strong>g causes ofdisability <strong>in</strong>cluded back or sp<strong>in</strong>e problems, stiffness or deformity of limbs and arthritis.Arthritis is an umbrella term referr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> a group of more than 100 medical conditions. Two ofthe most common forms of arthritis are osteoarthritis (OA) and rheuma<strong>to</strong>id arthritis (RA). It isestimated that 9.6% of males and 18.0% of females 60 years of age and older worldwide havesymp<strong>to</strong>matic OA.RA also has a worldwide distribution with an estimated prevalence of 1 <strong>to</strong> 2%. Both the<strong>in</strong>cidence and prevalence of RA <strong>in</strong>crease with age and both are two <strong>to</strong> three times greater <strong>in</strong>women than <strong>in</strong> men.123


13.3 Musculoskeletal conditions and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesFew studies have specifically exam<strong>in</strong>ed the relationship between musculoskeletal disabilities andimpaired driv<strong>in</strong>g performance. As well, it is difficult <strong>to</strong> draw specific conclusions from thisresearch because of differences <strong>in</strong> study design, outcome measures and the conditions studied, aswell as limited measurement of the degree of impairment of the subjects.Nonetheless, one broad conclusion that can be drawn is that many musculoskeletal conditions doappear <strong>to</strong> affect driv<strong>in</strong>g performance, often <strong>to</strong> a significant degree. In those studies thatexam<strong>in</strong>ed crash outcomes, the majority report elevated risk for crashes for those withmusculoskeletal impairments. Two studies <strong>in</strong> particular (one a meta-analysis) identified thatdrivers with a musculoskeletal condition had crash rates that were 70% higher than those withoutmusculoskeletal conditions.Another important consideration for <strong>in</strong>dividuals with musculoskeletal conditions who are treatedwith non-steroidal anti-<strong>in</strong>flamma<strong>to</strong>ry drugs (NSAIDS) and/or narcotics is the effect of thesedrugs on driv<strong>in</strong>g performance. The effect of the use of NSAIDS and narcotics is discussed <strong>in</strong>Chapter 29, Psychotropic Drugs.13.4 Effect of musculoskeletal conditions on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive<strong>Drive</strong>rs operat<strong>in</strong>g mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicles of any class must be able <strong>to</strong> carry out many complex muscularmovements swiftly, accurately and repeatedly <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> control a vehicle properly. Truck andbus drivers must also have good muscular strength and functional range of motion <strong>in</strong> both theirarms and legs <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> handle these heavier vehicles.Musculoskeletal conditions may cause a persistent impairment of mo<strong>to</strong>r functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g. The specific impact on functional ability varies by condition and type of impairment.Functional abilities that may be affected <strong>in</strong>clude: muscular strength range of motion flexion and extension of upper and lower extremities jo<strong>in</strong>t mobility, and trunk and neck mobility.Osteoarthritis has a considerable effect on functional ability, with the extent of the disabilityassociated with the location and severity of the disease. For example, the risk for disability(def<strong>in</strong>ed as need<strong>in</strong>g help walk<strong>in</strong>g or climb<strong>in</strong>g stairs) attributable <strong>to</strong> OA of the knee is as great asthat attributable <strong>to</strong> cardiovascular disease, and is greater than that due <strong>to</strong> any other medicalcondition <strong>in</strong> the aged population.Functional disability is the major consequence of rheuma<strong>to</strong>id arthritis. Individuals with RAoften experience a substantial loss of mobility due <strong>to</strong> pa<strong>in</strong> and jo<strong>in</strong>t destruction. In the fewstudies that have exam<strong>in</strong>ed the relationship between RA and driv<strong>in</strong>g performance 25% - 50% of<strong>in</strong>dividuals with RA reported difficulties with aspects of the driv<strong>in</strong>g tasks such as steer<strong>in</strong>g,corner<strong>in</strong>g, revers<strong>in</strong>g, head turns, and shoulder checks.124


ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessment approachPrimary functionalability affectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsLoss of limbDiseases of thejo<strong>in</strong>tsPersistent Impairment:Functional assessmentMo<strong>to</strong>r<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s reportDisabilities of thesp<strong>in</strong>eDeformityIC<strong>BC</strong> Road testFunctionalassessment by anoccupationaltherapist or driverrehabilitationspecialist13.5 CompensationIndividuals with musculoskeletal conditions may be able <strong>to</strong> compensate for functionalimpairment through strategies and/or vehicle modifications.StrategiesFor loss of limb, an <strong>in</strong>dividual may compensate through the use of a prosthetic device whendriv<strong>in</strong>g. Other strategies that do not require vehicle modifications may <strong>in</strong>clude, for example,rotat<strong>in</strong>g the upper body <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> check side view mirrors if the driver’s neck lacks sufficientmobility. The effectiveness of <strong>in</strong>dividual strategies may be determ<strong>in</strong>ed through a road test.Vehicle modificationsIndividuals with musculoskeletal conditions may be able <strong>to</strong> compensate for a functionalimpairment by driv<strong>in</strong>g a vehicle that has been modified <strong>to</strong> address their impairment.Compensa<strong>to</strong>ry vehicle modifications can <strong>in</strong>clude modifications <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g controls (e.g. handcontrolled throttle and brake) or the use of additional mirrors.An occupational therapist, driver rehabilitation specialist, driver exam<strong>in</strong>er or other medicalprofessional may recommend specific compensa<strong>to</strong>ry vehicle modifications based on an<strong>in</strong>dividual functional assessment. They are familiar with the full range of possible vehiclemodifications and what is appropriate for the type of musculoskeletal condition. Listed beloware examples of some possible vehicle modifications.125


Musculoskeletal conditionSome degree of loss of movement of thehead and neckMiss<strong>in</strong>g lower limbAmputation or deformity of either armPossible vehicle modificationsLeft and right outside mirrorsRear view camerasHand controlsLeft foot accelera<strong>to</strong>rPower assisted steer<strong>in</strong>gMechanical devices <strong>to</strong> permit all handcontrols <strong>to</strong> be operated by the normalhandThere is little empirical research that considers the relationship between vehicle modificationsand adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes. The effectiveness of <strong>in</strong>dividual vehicle modifications may bedeterm<strong>in</strong>ed through a road test.126


GUIDELINES13.6 Private and commercial drivers who have lost a limbApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have lost a limb of the upper or lowerextremities.OSMV will request an IC<strong>BC</strong> road test, unless there has been nosignificant change <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s condition or functional abilitys<strong>in</strong>ce a previous functional assessment.If an IC<strong>BC</strong> driver exam<strong>in</strong>er recommends further assessment, OSMVmay request: additional <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medicalcondition, and/or an assessment from an occupational therapist or driverrehabilitation specialist.Individuals may drive if: a road test <strong>in</strong>dicates that they are able <strong>to</strong> compensate for any lossof functional ability required for their class of licence held, and their licence is restricted so that they are only permitted <strong>to</strong> drivevehicles that have the modifications and devices required <strong>to</strong>compensate for their functional impairment.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if a functional assessment<strong>in</strong>dicates that they have the functional ability required for their classof licence held.No conditions are required.OSMV will restrict <strong>in</strong>dividuals’ licences so that they are only allowed<strong>to</strong> drive vehicles that have the permitted modifications and devicesrequired <strong>to</strong> compensate for their functional impairment. This may<strong>in</strong>clude one or more of the follow<strong>in</strong>g restrictions:25 Fitted prosthesis/leg brace required26 Specified vehicle modifications required28 Restricted <strong>to</strong> au<strong>to</strong>matic transmissionIf the loss of limb is not the result of a medical condition that isprogressive, OSMV will not re-assess, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercialor age-related re-assessment. If the loss of limb is the result of amedical condition that is progressive, the re-assessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es forthat medical condition apply.The impact of a loss of limb on fitness <strong>to</strong> drive is variable and mustbe determ<strong>in</strong>ed by an <strong>in</strong>dividual functional assessment.127


13.7 Private and commercial drivers who have a chronic musculoskeletalconditionApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have a chronic musculoskeletalcondition, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: diseases of the jo<strong>in</strong>ts disabilities of the sp<strong>in</strong>e, and deformity.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates: loss of range of motion, and/or weaknessOSMV will request an IC<strong>BC</strong> road test, unless there has been nosignificant change <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s condition or functional abilitys<strong>in</strong>ce a previous functional assessment.If an IC<strong>BC</strong> driver exam<strong>in</strong>er recommends further assessment, OSMVmay request: additional <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medicalcondition, and/or an assessment from an occupational therapist or driverrehabilitation specialist.Individuals may drive if: they reta<strong>in</strong> sufficient movement and strength <strong>to</strong> perform thefunctions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g for their class of licence held pa<strong>in</strong> associated with the condition, or the drugs used <strong>to</strong> treat thecondition, do not adversely affect their ability <strong>to</strong> drive safely where required, a road test or other functional assessment<strong>in</strong>dicates that they are able <strong>to</strong> compensate for any loss offunctional ability required for driv<strong>in</strong>g, and where permitted, they only drive with any vehicle modificationsand devices required <strong>to</strong> compensate for their functionalimpairment.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician does not <strong>in</strong>dicate a loss of range of motionor weakness that may impair their functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive, or where their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician does <strong>in</strong>dicate a loss of range ofmotion or weakness that may impair their functional ability <strong>to</strong>drive, a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have thefunctional ability required for their class of licence held.128


ConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleNo conditions are required.OSMV will restrict <strong>in</strong>dividuals’ licences so that they are only allowed<strong>to</strong> drive vehicles that have the permitted modifications and devicesrequired <strong>to</strong> compensate for their functional impairment. This may<strong>in</strong>clude one or more of the follow<strong>in</strong>g restrictions:25 Fitted prosthesis/leg brace required26 Specified vehicle modifications required28 Restricted <strong>to</strong> au<strong>to</strong>matic transmissionOSMV will not re-assess, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or agerelatedre-assessment, unless re-assessment is recommended by thetreat<strong>in</strong>g physician.The impact of a loss of limb on fitness <strong>to</strong> drive is variable and mustbe determ<strong>in</strong>ed by an <strong>in</strong>dividual functional assessment.129


Chapter 14: Chronic Renal DiseaseBACKGROUND14.1 About chronic renal diseaseChronic renal (kidney) disease is a progressive disease <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g deterioration and destruction ofrenal nephrons, with a progressive and usually permanent loss of renal function. Diabetes,hypertension and glomeruonephritis are lead<strong>in</strong>g causes of chronic renal disease. It is divided<strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> five stages of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g severity, as shown <strong>in</strong> the table below. The stages are based on ameasurement of kidney function called the glomerular filtration rate (GFR).StageStages of Chronic Renal DiseaseDescriptionGFRmL/m<strong>in</strong>/1.73m 21 Slight kidney damage – normal or elevated GFR More than 902 Kidney damage – mild decrease <strong>in</strong> GFR 60 <strong>to</strong> 893 Kidney damage – moderate decrease <strong>in</strong> GFR 30 <strong>to</strong> 594 Kidney damage – severe decrease <strong>in</strong> GFR 15 <strong>to</strong> 295 Kidney failure – dialysis or transplant required Less than 1514.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of chronic renal diseaseThe prevalence of chronic renal disease <strong>in</strong> the adult population <strong>in</strong> the United States is estimated<strong>to</strong> be 11% and it is assumed that the prevalence <strong>in</strong> Canada would be approximately the same. Itis more prevalent <strong>in</strong> the elderly population.Stage 5 of chronic renal disease (kidney failure) is also referred <strong>to</strong> as end–stage renal disease,and is characterized by a <strong>to</strong>tal or near–<strong>to</strong>tal loss of kidney function where an <strong>in</strong>dividual requiresdialysis or transplantation <strong>to</strong> stay alive. The prevalence rates for ESRD have <strong>in</strong>creasedsubstantially s<strong>in</strong>ce 1997, most likely because of improved survival rates among high-riskpopulations, e.g. people with diabetes and hypertension, as well as improvements <strong>in</strong> managemen<strong>to</strong>f ESRD, and the ag<strong>in</strong>g of the population.130


14.3 Chronic renal disease and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesThe evidence l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g chronic renal disease with adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes is weak because therehas been limited research <strong>in</strong> this area and the research that is available is either dated or hasmethodological limitations.14.4 Effect of chronic renal disease on functional ability <strong>to</strong> driveCognitive impairmentEvidence suggests that cognitive impairment is associated with chronic renal disease and thatwith <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g disease severity there is also a correspond<strong>in</strong>g decrease <strong>in</strong> cognitive function<strong>in</strong>g,which may impair functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive.The highest risk of cognitive impairment is for those with ESRD (stage 5). There is a small bodyof literature <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that ESRD is associated with dim<strong>in</strong>ished perceptual mo<strong>to</strong>r-coord<strong>in</strong>ation,impairments <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectual function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g decreased attention and concentration, andmemory impairments. Some studies <strong>in</strong>dicate that <strong>in</strong>dividuals with ESRD have a 2 <strong>to</strong> 7 timeshigher prevalence of cognitive impairment and dementia compared <strong>to</strong> the general population.There is also evidence of a significant risk of cognitive impairment for those <strong>in</strong> Stage 3 and 4 ofchronic renal disease. There is no evidence <strong>to</strong> suggest that risk of cognitive impairment <strong>in</strong> theearly stages (stage 1 and 2) is significant enough <strong>to</strong> impair driv<strong>in</strong>g.Research <strong>in</strong>dicates that cognitive impairment rang<strong>in</strong>g from mild <strong>to</strong> severe is common and oftenundiagnosed <strong>in</strong> dialysis patients. In particular, between 30% and 47% of older patientsundergo<strong>in</strong>g treatment by hemodialysis or peri<strong>to</strong>neal dialysis were classified as cognitivelyimpaired. In the general population, 8% of Canadians 65 and over have dementia and another17% have some form of cognitive impairment. One study also <strong>in</strong>dicated that physicians had atendency <strong>to</strong> underestimate cognitive impairment <strong>in</strong> patients undergo<strong>in</strong>g dialysis.Improvement <strong>in</strong> cognitive performance has been reported <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals who have undergone akidney transplant.General debilityIndividuals with chronic renal disease, particularly end-stage renal disease, may develop generaldebility result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a loss of stam<strong>in</strong>a required <strong>to</strong> support the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g.131


ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessment approachPrimary functionalability affectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsChronic renaldisease (Stage 3and 4)End-stage renaldiseasePersistent Impairment:Functional assessmentCognitiveMay also result <strong>in</strong>general debility<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportCognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong>ols such as;MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD,Trails A or B<strong>Drive</strong>ABLEassessmentRenal transplantPersistent Impairment:Functional assessmentCognitive<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportCognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong>ols such as;MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD,Trails A or B<strong>Drive</strong>ABLEassessment14.5 CompensationIndividuals with chronic renal disease are not able <strong>to</strong> compensate for their functional impairment.132


GUIDELINES14.6 Private and commercial drivers with stage 1 or 2 renal diseaseApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have stage 1 or 2 chronic renal disease.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.Individuals may drive.Individuals are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will not re-assess, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or agerelatedre-assessmentStage 1 or 2 chronic renal disease is unlikely <strong>to</strong> cause impairment ofthe functions needed for driv<strong>in</strong>g.133


14.7 Private and commercial drivers with stage 3 or 4 renal diseaseApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have stage 3 or 4 chronic renal disease.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.If cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessaryfor driv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicates possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMVwill request a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment.Individuals may drive if cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g or, where required, acognitive functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that their ability <strong>to</strong> drive isnot impaired.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g does not <strong>in</strong>dicatepossible impairment of the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g, or where the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicatespossible impairment of the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g, a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have thefunctional ability required for their class of licence held.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates possiblecognitive impairment, OSMV will re-assess annually. Otherwise,OSMV will re-assess every five years or <strong>in</strong> accordance with theschedule for rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-related re-assessment.<strong>Drive</strong>rs with stage 3 or 4 chronic renal disease have a significant riskfor cognitive impairment that could impair their functional ability <strong>to</strong>drive.134


14.8 Private drivers with end-stage renal diseaseApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessment guidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for private driverswho have end-stage renal disease.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.If cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicates possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMV willrequest a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment.Individuals may drive if: cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g or, where required, a cognitive functionalassessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that their ability <strong>to</strong> drive is not impaired they rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their prescribed dialysis regimen they do not drive if their dialysis treatment is delayed or circumstancesdo not allow them <strong>to</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> their dialysis schedule, and they rema<strong>in</strong> under regular medical supervision <strong>to</strong> ensure that anyprogression <strong>in</strong> their condition or development of co-morbid conditionsis moni<strong>to</strong>red.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their prescribed dialysis regimen, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g does not <strong>in</strong>dicate possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g or, wherethe treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, afunctional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have the functional abilityrequired <strong>to</strong> drive a private vehicle.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who is foundfit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must not drive if your dialysis treatment is delayed orcircumstances do not allow you <strong>to</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> your dialysis schedule, and you must rema<strong>in</strong> under regular medical supervision.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess annually.<strong>Drive</strong>rs with end-stage renal disease are at significant risk of cognitiveimpairment and general debility. Regular dialysis is required <strong>to</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>overall functional ability.135


14.9 Commercial drivers with end-stage renal diseaseApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessment guidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for commercialdrivers who have end-stage renal disease.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.If cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicates possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMV willrequest a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment.Individuals may drive if: cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g or, where required, a cognitive functionalassessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that their ability <strong>to</strong> drive is not impaired they rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their prescribed dialysis regimen they do not drive if their dialysis treatment is delayed or circumstancesdo not allow them <strong>to</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> their dialysis schedule they rema<strong>in</strong> under regular medical supervision by a nephrologist or<strong>in</strong>ternist <strong>to</strong> ensure that any progression <strong>in</strong> their condition ordevelopment of co-morbid conditions is moni<strong>to</strong>red, and their work schedule has been approved by their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician ascompatible with their dialysis regimen.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their prescribed dialysis regimen, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g does not <strong>in</strong>dicate possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g or, wherethe treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, afunctional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have the functional abilityrequired for their class of licence held.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who is foundfit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must not drive if your dialysis treatment is delayed orcircumstances do not allow you <strong>to</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> your dialysis schedule, and you must rema<strong>in</strong> under regular medical supervision.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess annually.<strong>Drive</strong>rs with end-stage renal disease are at significant risk of cognitiveimpairment and general debility. Regular dialysis is required <strong>to</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>overall functional ability.136


14.10 Private and commercial drivers who have had a renal transplantApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have had a renal transplant.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.If cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessaryfor driv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicates possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMVwill request a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment.Individuals may drive if cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g or, where required, acognitive functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that their ability <strong>to</strong> drive isnot impaired.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g does not <strong>in</strong>dicatepossible impairment of the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g, or where the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicatespossible impairment of the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g, a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have thefunctional ability required for their class of licence held.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates possiblecognitive impairment, OSMV will re-assess annually. Otherwise,OSMV will not re-assess, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or agerelatedre-assessment.Even after a successful renal transplant, there may be persistentcognitive impairment.137


Chapter 15: Respira<strong>to</strong>ry DiseasesBACKGROUND15.1 About respira<strong>to</strong>ry diseasesA number of respira<strong>to</strong>ry diseases may <strong>in</strong>terfere with the safe operation of a mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle bycaus<strong>in</strong>g reduced oxygen flow <strong>to</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong> and subsequent cognitive impairment, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gimpairments <strong>in</strong> attention, memory, decision mak<strong>in</strong>g, and judgement. Respira<strong>to</strong>ry diseases thatare most likely <strong>to</strong> affect cognitive function<strong>in</strong>g are those that are chronic <strong>in</strong> nature.This chapter focuses on one of the most prevalent respira<strong>to</strong>ry diseases, chronic obstructivepulmonary disease (COPD). However, other respira<strong>to</strong>ry diseases also have the potential <strong>to</strong>impair driv<strong>in</strong>g due <strong>to</strong> reduced oxygen flow <strong>to</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong>; where this is the case, the guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>this chapter also apply <strong>to</strong> them.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseCOPD refers <strong>to</strong> a group of diseases characterized by obstructed air flow such as emphysema andchronic bronchitis. Emphysema and chronic bronchitis frequently coexist and the term COPD isoften applied <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals suffer<strong>in</strong>g from these two disorders.The level of general impairment caused by respira<strong>to</strong>ry diseases is commonly described as mild,moderate, or severe, as described <strong>in</strong> the table below.Level ofImpairmentNormalNoneSymp<strong>to</strong>msPulmonary FunctionTest<strong>in</strong>g 6 resultFVC > 80% ofpredicted andFEV1 > 80% ofpredicted, andFEV1/FVC x 100 >75% andDLCOsb > 80% ofpredictedNature of generalImpairmentNone6 FVC = Forced vital capacity; FEV1 = Forced expira<strong>to</strong>ry volume <strong>in</strong> first second; FEV1/FVC x 100 = Us<strong>in</strong>g thepreviously selected values for FVC and FEV1, compute the ratio and express as percentage; D LCOsb = S<strong>in</strong>gle breathdiffus<strong>in</strong>g capacity138


Level ofImpairmentMildlyImpairedModeratelyImpairedSymp<strong>to</strong>msDyspnea whenwalk<strong>in</strong>g quickly onlevel ground or whenwalk<strong>in</strong>g uphill; ability<strong>to</strong> keep pace withpeople of same ageand body buildwalk<strong>in</strong>g on levelground, but not onhills or stairs.Shortness of breathwhen walk<strong>in</strong>g for afew m<strong>in</strong>utes or after100m walk<strong>in</strong>g onlevel groundPulmonary FunctionTest<strong>in</strong>g 6 resultFVC > 60 <strong>to</strong> 70% ofpredicted, orFEV1 > 60 <strong>to</strong> 79% ofpredicted, orFEV1/FVC x 100 60 <strong>to</strong>74% orDLCOsb 60 <strong>to</strong> 79% ofpredicted.FVC 51 <strong>to</strong> 59% ofpredicted orFEV1 41 <strong>to</strong> 59% ofpredicted, orFEV1/FVC x 100 41 <strong>to</strong>59% orDLCOsb 41 <strong>to</strong> 59% ofpredicted.Nature of generalImpairmentUsually not correlatedwith dim<strong>in</strong>ished ability <strong>to</strong>perform most jobsProgressively lower levelsof lung functioncorrelated withdim<strong>in</strong>ished ability <strong>to</strong> meetthe daily demands ofmany jobsSeverelyImpairedToo breathless <strong>to</strong>leave the house,breathless whendress<strong>in</strong>g.The presence ofuntreated respira<strong>to</strong>ryfailure.FVC 50% or less ofpredicted orFEV1 40% or less ofpredicted, orFEV1/FVC x 100 >40% or less orDLCOsb > 40% or lessof predicted.Unable <strong>to</strong> meet thephysical demands of mostjobs, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g travel <strong>to</strong>work15.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseEstimates from the World Health Organization <strong>in</strong>dicate that 80 million people have moderate <strong>to</strong>severe COPD. Chronic bronchitis affects <strong>in</strong>dividuals of all ages. Emphysema is more commonamong elderly <strong>in</strong>dividuals. In Canada men have a higher rate of COPD (6.3%) than women(5.2%). COPD <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> prevalence with age for both men and women with the highestprevalence for men over the age of 75 (9.1%).15.3 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesThere have been no studies that exam<strong>in</strong>e the relationship between respira<strong>to</strong>ry diseases andadverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes.139


15.4 Effect of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on functional ability <strong>to</strong>driveResearch <strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>in</strong>dividuals with COPD are at risk of cognitive impairment due <strong>to</strong> chronichypoxemia. For those with cognitive impairment, the impairment tends <strong>to</strong> be greater for morecomplex and demand<strong>in</strong>g cognitive tasks. This cognitive impairment may affect an <strong>in</strong>dividual’sfunctional ability <strong>to</strong> drive.Individuals with COPD also may develop general debility result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a loss of stam<strong>in</strong>a required<strong>to</strong> support the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g.Older <strong>in</strong>dividuals with COPD are more at-risk for functional impairment because they mayexperience: age-related decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> blood flow <strong>to</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong> disease-related decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> arterial oxygen content, and both age and disease-related decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> physical activity which can exacerbatedecondition<strong>in</strong>g.ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessment approachPrimary functionalability affectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsCOPD orotherrespira<strong>to</strong>rydiseasePersistent Impairment:Functional assessmentCognitiveMay also result <strong>in</strong>general debility<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportIC<strong>BC</strong> road testCognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong>ols such as;MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD,Trails A or B<strong>Drive</strong>ABLEassessment15.5 CompensationIndividuals with COPD may be able <strong>to</strong> compensate for their functional impairment by us<strong>in</strong>gsupplemental oxygen.140


GUIDELINES15.6 Private and commercial drivers with mild impairmentApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have mild impairment due <strong>to</strong> respira<strong>to</strong>rydisease.OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.Individuals may drive.Individuals are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will not re-assess, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or agerelatedre-assessment.Mild impairment due <strong>to</strong> respira<strong>to</strong>ry disease is unlikely <strong>to</strong> causesignificant impairment of the functions needed for driv<strong>in</strong>g.141


15.7 Private drivers with moderate impairmentApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have moderate impairment due <strong>to</strong> respira<strong>to</strong>ry disease.OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.Individuals may drive.Individuals are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess every 5 years, or as recommended by thetreat<strong>in</strong>g physician, unless rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment applies.Moderate impairment due <strong>to</strong> respira<strong>to</strong>ry disease is unlikely <strong>to</strong> causesignificant impairment of the functions needed for private driv<strong>in</strong>g.Re-assessment is required <strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>r for an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> impairmentthat may affect fitness <strong>to</strong> drive.142


15.8 Commercial drivers with moderate impairmentApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers who have moderate impairment due <strong>to</strong> respira<strong>to</strong>rydisease.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.OSMV will request an IC<strong>BC</strong> road test, unless there has been nosignificant change <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s condition or functional abilitys<strong>in</strong>ce a previous functional assessment.If an IC<strong>BC</strong> driver exam<strong>in</strong>er recommends further assessment, OSMVmay request: additional <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medicalcondition, and/or an assessment from an occupational therapist or driverrehabilitation specialist.Individuals may drive if a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates they haveadequate functional ability <strong>to</strong> operate the type of vehicle for whichthey are <strong>to</strong> be licensed.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if a functional assessment<strong>in</strong>dicates they have the functional ability required for their class oflicence held.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> accordance with the schedule for rout<strong>in</strong>ecommercial re-assessment.Moderate impairment due <strong>to</strong> respira<strong>to</strong>ry disease may cause significantimpairment of the functions needed for commercial driv<strong>in</strong>g.Decisions about driver fitness should be based on an <strong>in</strong>dividualfunctional assessment.143


15.9 Private drivers with severe impairmentApplicationThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have severe impairment due <strong>to</strong> respira<strong>to</strong>ry disease.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.If cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessaryfor driv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.Assessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleIf the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicates possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMVwill request a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment.OSMV will request an IC<strong>BC</strong> road test, unless there has been nosignificant change <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s condition or functional abilitys<strong>in</strong>ce a previous functional assessment.If an IC<strong>BC</strong> driver exam<strong>in</strong>er recommends further assessment, OSMVmay request: additional <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medicalcondition, and/or an assessment from an occupational therapist or driverrehabilitation specialist.Individuals may drive if a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates they haveadequate functional ability.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if a functional assessment<strong>in</strong>dicates they have the functional ability required <strong>to</strong> operate a privatevehicle.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates possiblecognitive impairment, OSMV will re-assess annually. Otherwise,OSMV will re-assess every 2 years or as recommended by thetreat<strong>in</strong>g physician.Severe impairment due <strong>to</strong> respira<strong>to</strong>ry disease may cause significantimpairment of the functions needed for private driv<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gcognitive impairment. Decisions about driver fitness should be basedon an <strong>in</strong>dividual functional assessment.144


15.10 Commercial drivers with severe impairment or requir<strong>in</strong>g supplementaloxygenApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers who have severe impairment, or requiresupplemental oxygen while at rest, due <strong>to</strong> respira<strong>to</strong>ry disease.OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.Individuals may not drive.Individuals are not fit <strong>to</strong> drive.N/AN/AN/ASevere impairment or a requirement for supplemental oxygen due <strong>to</strong>respira<strong>to</strong>ry disease generally <strong>in</strong>dicates significant impairment of thefunctions needed for driv<strong>in</strong>g commercial vehicles.145


15.11 Private drivers requir<strong>in</strong>g supplemental oxygenApplicationThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who require supplemental oxygen while at rest.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.If cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessaryfor driv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.Assessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esIf the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicates possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMVwill request a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment.OSMV will request an IC<strong>BC</strong> road test, unless there has been nosignificant change <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s condition or functional abilitys<strong>in</strong>ce a previous functional assessment.If an IC<strong>BC</strong> driver exam<strong>in</strong>er recommends further assessment, OSMVmay request: additional <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medicalcondition, and/or an assessment from an occupational therapist or driverrehabilitation specialist.Individuals may drive if: a road test while us<strong>in</strong>g supplemental oxygen <strong>in</strong>dicates they haveadequate functional ability, and their licence is restricted <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g only with supplementaloxygen.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if a functional assessmentwhile us<strong>in</strong>g supplemental oxygen <strong>in</strong>dicates they have adequatefunctional ability <strong>to</strong> operate a private vehicle.No conditions are required.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g restriction on the licence of an<strong>in</strong>dividual who is found fit <strong>to</strong> drive:51 May drive only when us<strong>in</strong>g supplemental oxygenIf the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates possiblecognitive impairment, OSMV will re-assess annually. Otherwise,OSMV will re-assess every 2 years or as recommended by thetreat<strong>in</strong>g physician.146


Policy rationale<strong>Drive</strong>rs who require supplemental oxygen due <strong>to</strong> respira<strong>to</strong>ry diseasemay have significant impairment of the functions needed for privatedriv<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cognitive impairment. Decisions about driverfitness should be based on an <strong>in</strong>dividual functional assessment,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g fitness <strong>to</strong> drive while us<strong>in</strong>g supplemental oxygen whererequired.147


15.12 Private and commercial drivers who have had a permanent tracheos<strong>to</strong>myApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have had a permanent tracheos<strong>to</strong>my.OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.Individuals may drive so long as they otherwise meet the guidel<strong>in</strong>esfor drivers with respira<strong>to</strong>ry disease.Individuals are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.No re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-related reassessment,is required.A permanent tracheos<strong>to</strong>my is unlikely <strong>to</strong> cause any impairment of thefunctions needed for driv<strong>in</strong>g.148


Chapter 16: Vestibular DisordersBACKGROUND16.1 About vestibular disordersThe vestibular system - or balance system - is a sensory apparatus localized <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner ears. Itprovides <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>to</strong> the nervous system about a person’s movement and orientation <strong>in</strong> space.Vestibular <strong>in</strong>put contributes <strong>to</strong>: control of balance gaze stabilization so that a person can see clearly while mov<strong>in</strong>g, and spatial orientation so that a person knows their position with reference <strong>to</strong> gravity.Vestibular disorders may result <strong>in</strong>: vertigo dizz<strong>in</strong>ess disturbed vision such as <strong>in</strong>voluntary eye movement, and illusory movement of the visual world as a result of head movement.A hallmark of vestibular disorders is vertigo, a term that refers <strong>to</strong> the sensation of sp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g orwhirl<strong>in</strong>g result<strong>in</strong>g from a disturbance <strong>in</strong> balance (equilibrium). Most commonly an attack ofvertigo generally lasts less than one m<strong>in</strong>ute (30 seconds is typical) but it may last up <strong>to</strong> 60m<strong>in</strong>utes. A small number of people may experience vertigo last<strong>in</strong>g as long as 24 hours and aneven smaller number may experience vertigo last<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>to</strong>, or beyond, 30 days.Disorders of the vestibular system are classified as either peripheral or central.Peripheral vestibular disordersPeripheral disorders are characterized by episodic fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g symp<strong>to</strong>ms; the dom<strong>in</strong>ant symp<strong>to</strong>mis ‘true sp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g vertigo’, that is the sensation of motion when no motion is occurr<strong>in</strong>g relative <strong>to</strong>earth’s gravity. Peripheral vestibular disorders typically occur as a s<strong>in</strong>gle acute episode or asrecurrent acute episodes. However, complete bilateral hypofunction may result <strong>in</strong> severe andconstant disequilibrium and motion sensitivity.The most common peripheral vestibular disorders and the typical duration of an episodic eventare shown <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g table.Disorderbenign paroxysmal position<strong>in</strong>g vertigo (BPPV)vestibular neuronitis (labyr<strong>in</strong>thitis)Meniere’s DiseaseDuration20-30 secondsTends <strong>to</strong> be s<strong>in</strong>gle attacklast<strong>in</strong>g days <strong>to</strong> weeks20 m<strong>in</strong>utes – 24 hours149


Less common peripheral vestibular disorders are described <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g table.DisorderTumark<strong>in</strong>’s O<strong>to</strong>lithic Crisis (drop attacks)Complete bilateral vestibular hypofunction(absence of function)DescriptionSudden, spontaneous fall <strong>to</strong> theground without prior warn<strong>in</strong>gMay result <strong>in</strong> severe andconstant disequilibrium andmotion sensitivityCentral vestibular disordersCentral vestibular disorders generally arise from underly<strong>in</strong>g persistent medical conditions.Because of this, they are more likely <strong>to</strong> produce prolonged cont<strong>in</strong>uous non-specific dizz<strong>in</strong>ess.They are characterized by difficulty <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation of vestibular, visual and proprioceptive (theunconscious perception of movement and spatial orientation aris<strong>in</strong>g from stimuli with<strong>in</strong> the bodyitself) <strong>in</strong>puts. Gaze stabilization and posture dur<strong>in</strong>g locomotion may also be affected.Common persistent medical conditions that can cause persistent central vestibular dysfunctionare: cerebrovascular disease cervical vertigo epilepsy multiple sclerosis normal pressure hydrocephalus paraneoplastic syndromes (a response <strong>to</strong> the effects of a tumour <strong>in</strong> the body), and traumatic bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>jury.Common episodic medical conditions that are not related <strong>to</strong> structural bra<strong>in</strong> disease but that maycause central vestibular disorders, and typical episode duration, are shown <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g table.Disordermigra<strong>in</strong>esPsychogenic vertigo/anxiety(hyperventilation syndrome)Durationa few seconds <strong>to</strong> hoursa few seconds <strong>to</strong> hours16.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of vestibular disordersPeripheral vestibular disorders are more common than central vestibular disorders.Age-related decrements <strong>in</strong> vestibular function are well documented and are likely due <strong>to</strong>degeneration at both the central and peripheral level. BPPV is reported as a common underly<strong>in</strong>gcause of impairments <strong>in</strong> balance with ag<strong>in</strong>g.A 2005 study on the frequency of moderate or severe vertigo and dizz<strong>in</strong>ess reported that 36.2%of women and 22.4% of men had experienced vertigo or dizz<strong>in</strong>ess at some po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> their life.150


One study identified that 32.5% of people with Meniere’s disease developed drop attacks(Tumark<strong>in</strong>’s o<strong>to</strong>lithic crisis); the attacks typically occurred <strong>in</strong> a flurry dur<strong>in</strong>g a period of 1 yearor less. No patient <strong>in</strong> the study required treatment for the drop attacks. Most people with thishave a spontaneous remission of the drop attacks.16.3 Vestibular disorders and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesThe evidence l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g vestibular disorders with adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes is weak because therehas been little empirical research <strong>in</strong> this area. Nonetheless driv<strong>in</strong>g ability is dependent on thenormal function<strong>in</strong>g of the vestibular mechanism <strong>to</strong> sense movement and position.In subjective studies where drivers with vestibular disorders were asked about driv<strong>in</strong>g, driv<strong>in</strong>gdifficulties were commonly reported and <strong>in</strong>cluded a wide range of difficulties <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g driv<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> the ra<strong>in</strong>, at night, pull<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> and out of park<strong>in</strong>g spaces, chang<strong>in</strong>g lanes, and freeway and rushhour driv<strong>in</strong>g.In one study, 20-40% of drivers reported that they had had <strong>to</strong> pull off the road while driv<strong>in</strong>g due<strong>to</strong> vertigo. In a different study, 43% <strong>in</strong>dicated that they had felt dizzy while driv<strong>in</strong>g; only 27%<strong>in</strong>dicated that they ‘always’ or ‘usually’ got a warn<strong>in</strong>g that a dizzy spell was about <strong>to</strong> occur, withmore than 1/3 <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that they ‘rarely’ or ‘never’ get warn<strong>in</strong>gs. Of those who did getwarn<strong>in</strong>gs, 56% <strong>in</strong>dicated that there was less than a 5-second <strong>in</strong>terval between the warn<strong>in</strong>g andthe dizzy spell.16.4 Effect of vestibular disorders on functional ability <strong>to</strong> driveThe functional effects associated with vestibular disorders can occur suddenly and with sufficientseverity <strong>to</strong> make safe driv<strong>in</strong>g of any type of vehicle impossible.People with vestibular disorders become disoriented more easily by extraneous visual stimuli orvisual noise. This means that drivers are more likely <strong>to</strong> have difficulty driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> reduced visualconditions such as driv<strong>in</strong>g at night or <strong>in</strong> the ra<strong>in</strong>.Rapid head movements are also likely <strong>to</strong> elicit vertigo <strong>in</strong> people with vestibular disorders. Thismeans that tasks such as park<strong>in</strong>g a car, maneuver<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a park<strong>in</strong>g space, lane ma<strong>in</strong>tenance andlane changes, and enter<strong>in</strong>g traffic may be risk fac<strong>to</strong>rs for the onset of vertigo.Research also <strong>in</strong>dicates that damage <strong>to</strong> the vestibular system results <strong>in</strong> cognitive deficits <strong>in</strong>people with both peripheral and central vestibular disorders. People with vestibular disordersexhibit a range of cognitive deficits <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g those that are spatial and non-spatial. Thecognitive deficits do not appear <strong>to</strong> be related <strong>to</strong> any particular episode of vertigo or dizz<strong>in</strong>ess andthe deficits may occur even <strong>in</strong> those people who have no symp<strong>to</strong>ms of dizz<strong>in</strong>ess or posturaldeficits.151


Central vestibular disordersThe majority of central vestibular disorders have a persistent impact on driv<strong>in</strong>g because theyarise from underly<strong>in</strong>g persistent medical conditions. However, two common causes of centralvestibular disorders - migra<strong>in</strong>es and hyperventilation syndrome - are episodic <strong>in</strong> nature withshort disease duration.Peripheral vestibular disordersPeripheral vestibular disorders are generally more episodic with, <strong>in</strong> general, shorter diseaseduration. <strong>Drive</strong>rs, however, with complete bilateral vestibular hypofunction (absence offunction) may have severe and constant disequilibrium and motion sensitivity forever. Thesedrivers may have more difficulty driv<strong>in</strong>g, particularly dur<strong>in</strong>g even<strong>in</strong>g hours or on bumpy roads,and may not be safe <strong>to</strong> drive.ConditionType ofdriv<strong>in</strong>gimpairmentand assessmentapproachPrimaryfunctionalabilityaffectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsVestibular disorders result<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> episodic impairment,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g:migra<strong>in</strong>espsychogenic vertigo/anxiety (hyperventilationsyndrome)benign paroxysmalposition<strong>in</strong>g vertigo (BPPV)Meniere’s Diseasevestibular neuronitis(labyr<strong>in</strong>thitis)Tumark<strong>in</strong>’s O<strong>to</strong>lithic Crisis(drop attacks)Episodicimpairment:Medicalassessment –likelihood ofimpairmentPersistentImpairment:FunctionalassessmentSensorimo<strong>to</strong>rCognitive<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s report<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportCognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong>ols such as; MOCA,MMSE, SIMARD-MD,Trails A or B<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment152


ConditionType ofdriv<strong>in</strong>gimpairmentand assessmentapproachPrimaryfunctionalabilityaffectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsVestibular disorders result<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> persistent impairment,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: complete bilateralvestibular hypofunction(absence of function), or vestibular disorderresult<strong>in</strong>g from anunderly<strong>in</strong>g persistentmedical condition.16.5 CompensationPersistentImpairment:FunctionalassessmentSensorimo<strong>to</strong>rCognitive<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportCognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong>ols such as; MOCA,MMSE, SIMARD-MD,Trails A or B<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessmentFunctional assessmentby an occupationaltherapist or driverrehabilitation specialistIndividuals with vestibular disorders are not able <strong>to</strong> compensate for their functional impairment.153


GUIDELINES16.6 Private and commercial drivers with recurrent episodes that occur withwarn<strong>in</strong>g symp<strong>to</strong>msApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> private and commercial drivers with avestibular disorder who have recurrent episodes of vestibulardysfunction that occur with warn<strong>in</strong>g symp<strong>to</strong>ms. This may <strong>in</strong>clude<strong>in</strong>dividuals with: benign paroxysmal position<strong>in</strong>g vertigo (BPPV) Meniere’s disease vestibular neuronitis (labyr<strong>in</strong>thitis) migra<strong>in</strong>es, or psychogenic vertigo/anxiety (hyperventilation syndrome).If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.Individuals may drive if: the warn<strong>in</strong>g symp<strong>to</strong>ms are of sufficient duration, and not <strong>in</strong>capacitat<strong>in</strong>g,such that a driver would have the time and capability <strong>to</strong> pull off theroad.<strong>Drive</strong>rs that experience an episode of vestibular dysfunction may notresume driv<strong>in</strong>g until all symp<strong>to</strong>ms associated with the episode haves<strong>to</strong>pped.OSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsOSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the warn<strong>in</strong>g symp<strong>to</strong>ms are of sufficient duration, and not <strong>in</strong>capacitat<strong>in</strong>g,such that a driver would have the time and capability <strong>to</strong> pull off theroad.<strong>Drive</strong>rs that experience an episode of vestibular dysfunction may notresume driv<strong>in</strong>g until all symp<strong>to</strong>ms associated with the episode haves<strong>to</strong>pped.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g condition on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: if you experience an episode of vestibular dysfunction, you mustnot resume driv<strong>in</strong>g until all symp<strong>to</strong>ms associated with the episodehave s<strong>to</strong>pped.No restrictions are required.154


Re-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleNo re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-relatedassessment, is required.The risk from an episodic vestibular dysfunction can be mitigatedwhere the episode is consistently preceded by warn<strong>in</strong>g symp<strong>to</strong>ms thatare not <strong>in</strong>capacitat<strong>in</strong>g and which last long enough for a driver <strong>to</strong>safely s<strong>to</strong>p their driv<strong>in</strong>g until the episode is over.155


16.7 Private and commercial drivers with recurrent episodes that occur withoutwarn<strong>in</strong>g symp<strong>to</strong>msApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessment guidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> private and commercial drivers with a vestibulardisorder who have recurrent episodes of vestibular dysfunction that occurwithout warn<strong>in</strong>g symp<strong>to</strong>ms. This may <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>dividuals with: benign paroxysmal position<strong>in</strong>g vertigo (BPPV) Meniere’s disease vestibular neuronitis (labyr<strong>in</strong>thitis) migra<strong>in</strong>es, or psychogenic vertigo/anxiety (hyperventilation syndrome).If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a specialist.Individuals must immediately s<strong>to</strong>p driv<strong>in</strong>g and may not drive for am<strong>in</strong>imum of 6 months after an episode. After 6 months, <strong>in</strong>dividuals maydrive: private vehicles if their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that their symp<strong>to</strong>mshave been controlled or have abated commercial vehicles if a specialist <strong>in</strong>dicates that their symp<strong>to</strong>ms havebeen controlled or have abated.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least 6 months s<strong>in</strong>ce they last had an episode, and for private drivers, their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that their symp<strong>to</strong>mshave been controlled or have abated, or for commercial drivers, a specialist, or their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician if thephysician has been treat<strong>in</strong>g the patient for two years or more, <strong>in</strong>dicatesthat their symp<strong>to</strong>ms have been controlled or have abated.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g condition on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who is foundfit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must immediately s<strong>to</strong>p driv<strong>in</strong>g and report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and yourphysician if you have an episode of vestibular dysfunction.No restrictions are required.No re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-related assessment,is required.Where episodes of vestibular dysfunction are not preceded by warn<strong>in</strong>gsymp<strong>to</strong>ms or the warn<strong>in</strong>g symp<strong>to</strong>ms are not sufficient <strong>to</strong> allow the driver <strong>to</strong>safely s<strong>to</strong>p driv<strong>in</strong>g, evidence that further episodes are unlikely <strong>to</strong> occur isrequired <strong>to</strong> mitigate the risk. Consensus medical op<strong>in</strong>ion suggests that thisevidence should <strong>in</strong>clude a m<strong>in</strong>imum period of 6 months without an episodeand op<strong>in</strong>ion of the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician that this episode-free period reflectseffective treatment or abatement of the episodes.156


16.8 Private and commercial drivers with drop attacksApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> private and commercial drivers with dropattacks result<strong>in</strong>g from Tumark<strong>in</strong>’s o<strong>to</strong>lithic crisis.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.Individuals may drive if: a doc<strong>to</strong>r confirms the driver has been successfully treated, or 6 months has passed s<strong>in</strong>ce the most recent drop attack.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that the <strong>in</strong>dividual has beensuccessfully treated, or it has been at least 6 months s<strong>in</strong>ce the last drop attack.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g condition on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must immediately s<strong>to</strong>p driv<strong>in</strong>g and report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and yourphysician if you have a drop attack.No restrictions are required.If an attack occurred with<strong>in</strong> the past 12 months, OSMV will re-assess<strong>in</strong> one year. If no new attacks are reported at that time, OSMV willre-assess <strong>in</strong> 5 years, or <strong>in</strong> accordance with the schedule for rout<strong>in</strong>ecommercial or age-related re-assessment. If no new attacks arereported at that time, no further re-assessment is required, other thanrout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-related re-assessment.For drop attacks, which occur without warn<strong>in</strong>g, evidence that furtherattacks are unlikely <strong>to</strong> occur is required <strong>to</strong> mitigate the risk.Consensus medical op<strong>in</strong>ion suggests that this evidence should be anop<strong>in</strong>ion from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician that the driver has beensuccessfully treated or that 6 months has passed without an attack.157


16.9 Private and commercial drivers who experience a s<strong>in</strong>gle episode ofvestibular dysfunctionApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> private and commercial drivers whoexperience a s<strong>in</strong>gle episode of vestibular dysfunction.OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.Individuals may not drive until their condition has subsided and theacute symp<strong>to</strong>ms have resolved.Individuals are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.No re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-related reassessment,is required.A s<strong>in</strong>gle episode of vestibular dysfunction is a transient impairment.158


16.10 Private and commercial drivers with vestibular disorders result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>persistent impairmentApplicationThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> private and commercial drivers withvestibular disorders result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> persistent impairment.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.If cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessaryfor driv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.Assessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleOSMV will request an assessment of the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s sensorimo<strong>to</strong>rfunction from an occupational therapist or driver rehabilitationspecialist, unless there has been no significant change <strong>in</strong> the<strong>in</strong>dividual’s condition or functional ability s<strong>in</strong>ce a previous functionalassessment.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicates possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMVwill request a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment.Individuals may or may not drive based on the result of theircognitive and/or sensorimo<strong>to</strong>r functional assessment.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if a functional assessment<strong>in</strong>dicates they have the functional ability required for their class oflicence held.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will determ<strong>in</strong>e the appropriate re-assessment <strong>in</strong>terval on an<strong>in</strong>dividual basis.Persistent vestibular dysfunction may cause significant impairment ofthe functions needed for driv<strong>in</strong>g. Decisions about driver fitnessshould be based on an <strong>in</strong>dividual functional assessment.159


Chapter 17: Cardiovascular Disease and DisordersBACKGROUND17.1 About cardiovascular diseaseCardiovascular disease is an umbrella term used <strong>to</strong> describe a variety of disorders relat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> theheart and blood vessels.Coronary artery diseaseCoronary artery disease, which is also called coronary, ischemic or atherosclerotic heart disease,is characterized by the presence of atherosclerosis <strong>in</strong> the arteries of the heart. Atherosclerosis isthe progressive build-up of fatty deposits called plaque, which narrows the coronary arteries andreduces blood flow <strong>to</strong> the heart. Complications of coronary artery disease <strong>in</strong>clude: ang<strong>in</strong>a (pa<strong>in</strong> or discomfort due <strong>to</strong> lack of oxygen <strong>to</strong> the heart muscle) myocardial <strong>in</strong>farction (heart attack), and ischemic cardiomyopathy (permanent damage <strong>to</strong> the heart muscle).Disturbances of cardiac rhythmDisturbances of cardiac rhythm, or arrhythmias, <strong>in</strong>clude: tachycardia (rapid heart rate) bradycardia (slow heart rate) fibrillation or flutter (abnormal twitch<strong>in</strong>g of the heart muscle), and heart block.These arrhythmias may arise from the heart muscle itself or the conduction system and are oftensecondary <strong>to</strong> underly<strong>in</strong>g heart disease.Valvular heart diseaseDisease affect<strong>in</strong>g the heart valves may result <strong>in</strong> stenosis and regurgitation, and is associated withan <strong>in</strong>creased risk of thromboembolism.In valvular stenosis, the valve open<strong>in</strong>g is smaller than normal due <strong>to</strong> harden<strong>in</strong>g or fus<strong>in</strong>g of thevalve’s leaflets. This may cause the heart <strong>to</strong> have <strong>to</strong> work harder <strong>to</strong> pump blood through thevalves. In valvular regurgitation or “leaky valve”, the valve does not close tightly enough,allow<strong>in</strong>g some blood <strong>to</strong> leak backwards across the valve. As the leak worsens, the heart has <strong>to</strong>work harder <strong>to</strong> make up for the leaky valve, and less blood may flow <strong>to</strong> the rest of the body.Stenosis and regurgitation may coexist.160


Individuals who have undergone valve replacement surgery are subject <strong>to</strong> a certa<strong>in</strong> irreducible<strong>in</strong>cidence of late complications such as thromboembolism, dehiscence, <strong>in</strong>fection and mechanicalmalfunction.Congestive heart failureCongestive heart failure usually is a chronic, progressive condition <strong>in</strong> which the heart is unable<strong>to</strong> pump the quantity of blood required <strong>to</strong> meet the body's needs. It is generally the result ofheart disease but may be secondary <strong>to</strong> non-cardiac conditions such as fluid overload and anemia.The severity of congestive heart failure can be assessed by measur<strong>in</strong>g the fraction of blood be<strong>in</strong>gpumped out of the left ventricle with each beat. This is expressed as a ratio called the leftventricle ejection fraction (LVEF). Healthy <strong>in</strong>dividuals generally have an LVEF greater than55%.The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system provides a simple,cl<strong>in</strong>ical measure for assess<strong>in</strong>g the degree of heart failure. This system describes the effect ofcardiovascular disease on an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s general physical activity, accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the categoriesshown <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g table.CategoryIIIIIIIVDescriptionNo symp<strong>to</strong>ms and no limitation <strong>in</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>ary physical activity.Comfortable at rest.Mild symp<strong>to</strong>ms and slight limitation dur<strong>in</strong>g ord<strong>in</strong>ary activity.Comfortable at rest.Marked limitation <strong>in</strong> activity due <strong>to</strong> symp<strong>to</strong>ms, even dur<strong>in</strong>g less-thanord<strong>in</strong>aryactivity. Comfortable only at rest.Severe limitations. Experiences symp<strong>to</strong>ms even while at rest.CardiomyopathyCardiomyopathy refers <strong>to</strong> a change <strong>in</strong> the size, strength or flexibility <strong>in</strong> the heart muscle. Thesechanges can reduce the amount of blood be<strong>in</strong>g pumped out of the heart, and may lead <strong>to</strong>congestive heart failure. Cardiomyopathy is associated with an <strong>in</strong>creased risk of arrhythmias.Abnormal blood pressureHypertension (high blood pressure) is the most common and most important risk fac<strong>to</strong>r fordevelop<strong>in</strong>g cardiovascular disease and stroke. Hypotension (low blood pressure) is less commonthan hypertension. Individuals with hypotension may experience syncope.161


Percent17.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of cardiovascular diseaseCardiovascular disease is a major cause of death, disability and health care costs <strong>in</strong> Canada.Although cardiovascular disease death rates have been decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce the mid-1960s, statisticsfrom 1997 <strong>in</strong>dicate that cardiovascular disease was still the lead<strong>in</strong>g cause of death <strong>in</strong> Canada,account<strong>in</strong>g for 36% of all deaths <strong>in</strong> men and 38% <strong>in</strong> women. As shown <strong>in</strong> the graph below, theproportion of deaths caused by cardiovascular disease <strong>in</strong>creases dramatically with age.Percentage of <strong>to</strong>tal deaths due <strong>to</strong> cardiovascular disease605040WomenMen30<strong>2010</strong>0


Episodic impairmentThe potential episodic impairment is a partial or complete loss of consciousness that<strong>in</strong>capacitates the driver. This may be caused by a variety of cardiovascular events such as: bradyarrhythmias tachyarrhythmias myocardial disease (massive myocardial <strong>in</strong>farction) left ventricular myocardial restriction or constriction pericardial constriction or tamponade aortic outflow tract obstruction aortic valvular stenosis, or hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.Persistent impairmentIndividuals with congestive heart failure may develop persistent cognitive impairment, loss ofstam<strong>in</strong>a or general debility as a result of a reduction of oxygen <strong>to</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong>, organs and tissues.Cardiac arrest may also cause persistent cognitive impairment where a loss of blood <strong>to</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong>causes bra<strong>in</strong> damage.Neurocognitive deficits can occur <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals undergo<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tracardiac procedures (e.g. valvesurgery) or extracardiac procedures (e.g. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery).However, the majority of studies <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g cognitive decl<strong>in</strong>e have focused on <strong>in</strong>dividualsundergo<strong>in</strong>g CABG surgery. The results of those studies <strong>in</strong>dicate that a significant number of<strong>in</strong>dividuals experience post-operative cognitive decl<strong>in</strong>e (POCD) for several months after surgery,with documented decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> memory, attention, speed of process<strong>in</strong>g, and executive function<strong>in</strong>g.Studies <strong>in</strong>dicate that between 20% and 79% of <strong>in</strong>dividuals experience POCD between 6 weeksand 6 months of CABG surgery, with a majority of the studies show<strong>in</strong>g a rate of 45% or higher.In those studies that have followed <strong>in</strong>dividuals for more than 6 months post-surgery, the results<strong>in</strong>dicate that up <strong>to</strong> 35% of <strong>in</strong>dividuals will show POCD one year after surgery. The currentunderstand<strong>in</strong>g is that POCD is the result of a number of fac<strong>to</strong>rs associated with cardiactreatment, rather than a s<strong>in</strong>gle fac<strong>to</strong>r such as the use of cardiopulmonary bypass.163


ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessmentapproachPrimaryfunctionalabilityaffectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsCoronary artery diseaseArrhythmiasValvular heart diseaseEpisodicimpairment:Medical assessment– likelihood ofimpairmentAll – sudden<strong>in</strong>capacitation<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s reportCardiomyopathyCongestive heart failurePersistentImpairment:FunctionalassessmentCognitiveMay also result<strong>in</strong> generaldebility or lackof stam<strong>in</strong>a<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportIC<strong>BC</strong> road testCognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>olssuch as; MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD, Trails Aor B<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessmentEpisodicimpairment:Medical assessment– likelihood ofimpairmentAll – sudden<strong>in</strong>capacitation<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s reportPost cardiac arrestPost-operative cognitivedecl<strong>in</strong>e (POCD)PersistentImpairment:FunctionalassessmentCognitive<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportCognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>olssuch as; MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD, Trails Aor B<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment17.5 CompensationIndividuals with cardiovascular disease are not able <strong>to</strong> compensate for their functionalimpairment.164


GUIDELINES17.6 Policy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es are based primarily on recommendations conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al report of the2003 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Consensus Conference Assessment of the CardiacPatient for <strong>Fitness</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Drive</strong> and Fly. The CCS recommendations focus exclusively on thepotential episodic impairments associated with cardiovascular diseases.Additional guidel<strong>in</strong>es have been added <strong>to</strong> address potential persistent cognitive impairmentcaused by congestive heart failure, and the potential for co-morbid cognitive impairment <strong>in</strong>relation <strong>to</strong> cardiac arrest, and post-operative cognitive decl<strong>in</strong>e (POCD) follow<strong>in</strong>g coronary arterybypass graft (CABG) surgery. Where guidel<strong>in</strong>es have been added or changed, the rationale is<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the table.17.7 Private and commercial drivers with congenital heart defectsApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have a congenital heart defect.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if they meet any guidel<strong>in</strong>es related <strong>to</strong> a specificcardiovascular condition or event.Individuals are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If the defect has been repaired and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician does not<strong>in</strong>dicate any concerns, no re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>ecommercial or age-related re-assessment, is required. If the defecthas not been repaired, OSMV will re-assess every 5 years, unlessrout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-related re-assessment applies.Congenital heart defects are not specifically addressed <strong>in</strong> the CCSguidel<strong>in</strong>es. It is <strong>in</strong>cluded here <strong>in</strong> recognition that a congenital heartdefect may be reported <strong>to</strong> OSMV. The nature of congenital heartdefects and their treatment is variable; therefore there are no specificfitness guidel<strong>in</strong>es for them.165


17.8 Private drivers with coronary artery diseaseApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have coronary artery disease.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may not drive if they have an angiographic demonstrationof 70% or greater reduction <strong>in</strong> the diameter of the left ma<strong>in</strong> coronaryartery, unless successfully treated with revascularization.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they have an angiographic demonstration of less than a 70%reduction <strong>in</strong> the diameter of the left ma<strong>in</strong> coronary artery, orwhere they have a 70% or greater reduction <strong>in</strong> the diameter of theleft ma<strong>in</strong> coronary artery, it has been successfully treated withrevascularizationNo conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess every five years, or as recommended by thetreat<strong>in</strong>g physician, unless rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment applies.166


17.9 Commercial drivers with coronary artery diseaseApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers who have coronary artery disease.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may not drive if they have an angiographic demonstrationof 50% or greater reduction <strong>in</strong> the diameter of the left ma<strong>in</strong> coronaryartery, unless successfully treated with revascularization.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they have an angiographic demonstration of less than a 50%reduction <strong>in</strong> the diameter of the left ma<strong>in</strong> coronary artery, orwhere they have a 50% or greater reduction <strong>in</strong> the diameter of theleft ma<strong>in</strong> coronary artery, it has been successfully treated withrevascularizationNo conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> accordance with rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial reassessment,or as recommended by the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.167


17.10 Private and commercial drivers with asymp<strong>to</strong>matic coronary artery diseaseor stable ang<strong>in</strong>aApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have : asymp<strong>to</strong>matic coronary artery disease, or stable ang<strong>in</strong>a.OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.No restrictions.Individuals are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess every five years, unless rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial orage-related re-assessment applies.168


17.11 Private drivers who have had CABG surgeryApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have had coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgeryIf further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.If cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessaryfor driv<strong>in</strong>g are not impaired, OSMV will not request furtherassessments.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicates possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMVwill request a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment.Individuals may drive if: it has been 1 month or more s<strong>in</strong>ce CABG surgery, and they have sufficient cognitive function <strong>to</strong> drive.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g does not <strong>in</strong>dicatepossible impairment of the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g, or where the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicatespossible impairment of the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g, a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have thefunctional ability required <strong>to</strong> drive a private vehicle.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates possiblecognitive impairment, OSMV will re-assess annually. Otherwise,OSMV will re-assess every five years, unless rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related reassessmentapplies.The guidel<strong>in</strong>es regard<strong>in</strong>g cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g are not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> theCCS recommendations. These have been added <strong>to</strong> address thepotential for persistent cognitive impairment associated with pos<strong>to</strong>perativecognitive decl<strong>in</strong>e (POCD) follow<strong>in</strong>g CABG surgery.169


17.12 Commercial drivers who have had CABG surgeryApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers who have had coronary artery bypass graft(CABG) surgeryIf further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physicianIf cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessaryfor driv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicates possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMVwill request a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment.Individuals may drive if: it has been 3 months or more s<strong>in</strong>ce CABG surgery, and they have sufficient cognitive function <strong>to</strong> drive.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g does not <strong>in</strong>dicatepossible impairment of the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g, or where the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicatespossible impairment of the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g, a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have thefunctional ability required for their class of licence held.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates possiblecognitive impairment, OSMV will re-assess annually. Otherwise,OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> accordance with rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial reassessment.The guidel<strong>in</strong>es regard<strong>in</strong>g cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g are not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> theCCS recommendations. These have been added <strong>to</strong> address thepotential for persistent cognitive impairment associated with pos<strong>to</strong>perativecognitive decl<strong>in</strong>e (POCD) follow<strong>in</strong>g CABG surgery.170


17.13 Private and commercial drivers who have experienced cardiac arrestApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have experienced cardiac arrestIf further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.If cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessaryfor driv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicates possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMVwill request a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment.Individuals may drive if: they have sufficient cognitive function <strong>to</strong> drive, and they meet any other applicable cardiovascular disease guidel<strong>in</strong>es.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g does not <strong>in</strong>dicatepossible impairment of the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g, or where the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicatespossible impairment of the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g, a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have thefunctional ability required for their class of licence held.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates possiblecognitive impairment, OSMV will re-assess annually. Otherwise,OSMV will re-assess every five years, unless rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial orage-related re-assessment applies.Cardiac arrest is not specifically addressed <strong>in</strong> the CCSrecommendations. The guidel<strong>in</strong>es are <strong>in</strong>cluded here <strong>to</strong> address thepotential for persistent cognitive impairment as a result of cardiacarrest.171


17.14 Private and commercial drivers who have premature atrial or ventricularcontractionsApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have premature atrial or ventricularcontractions.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if they have no associated impaired level ofconsciousness.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if they have no associatedimpaired level of consciousness.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If there is no underly<strong>in</strong>g cardiovascular disease, no re-assessment isrequired, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-related re-assessment.Where there is an underly<strong>in</strong>g cardiovascular disease, OSMV will reassessaccord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the guidel<strong>in</strong>es for that condition.172


17.15 Private drivers who have ventricular fibrillation with no reversible causeApplicationAssessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMVdeterm<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have ventricular fibrillation (VF) with no reversiblecause. These guidel<strong>in</strong>es do not apply <strong>to</strong> drivers who have VF due <strong>to</strong>any of the follow<strong>in</strong>g reversible causes: VF with<strong>in</strong> 24 hours of myocardial <strong>in</strong>farction VF dur<strong>in</strong>g coronary angiography VF with electrocution, or VF secondary <strong>to</strong> drug <strong>to</strong>xicity.If VF has a reversible cause, it is considered a transient condition.The Canadian Cardiovascular Society recommendation for VF with areversible cause is <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> 17.55.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.If cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessaryfor driv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicates possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMVwill request a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment.Individuals may drive if: it has been 6 months or more s<strong>in</strong>ce their last episode of VF, and they have sufficient cognitive function <strong>to</strong> drive.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least six months s<strong>in</strong>ce their last episode of VF, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g does not <strong>in</strong>dicatepossible impairment of the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g or, where the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>dicates possible impairment of the cognitive functionsnecessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that theyhave the functional ability required <strong>to</strong> drive a private vehicle.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates possiblecognitive impairment, OSMV will re-assess annually. Otherwise,OSMV will re-assess every five years, or as recommended by thetreat<strong>in</strong>g physician, unless rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment applies.173


17.16 Commercial drivers who have ventricular fibrillation with no reversiblecauseApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers who have ventricular fibrillation (VF) with noreversible cause. These guidel<strong>in</strong>es do not apply <strong>to</strong> drivers who haveVF due <strong>to</strong> any of the follow<strong>in</strong>g reversible causes: VF with<strong>in</strong> 24 hours of myocardial <strong>in</strong>farction VF dur<strong>in</strong>g coronary angiography VF with electrocution, or VF secondary <strong>to</strong> drug <strong>to</strong>xicity.If VF has a reversible cause, it is considered a transient condition.The Canadian Cardiovascular Society recommendation for VF with areversible cause is <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> 17.53.OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.Individuals may not drive.Individuals are not fit <strong>to</strong> drive.N/AN/AN/A174


17.17 Private and commercial drivers who have hemodynamically unstable VTApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have hemodynamically unstableventricular tachycardia (VT).If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if the underly<strong>in</strong>g condition has beensuccessfully treated.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if the underly<strong>in</strong>g conditionhas been successfully treated.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess every five years or as recommended by thetreat<strong>in</strong>g physician, unless rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-related reassessmentapplies.175


17.18 Private drivers who have susta<strong>in</strong>ed VT and an LVEF of


17.19 Private drivers who have susta<strong>in</strong>ed VT and an LVEF of > 30%ApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have susta<strong>in</strong>ed ventricular tachycardia (VT): with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of > 30%with no associated impaired level of consciousness, andan implantable cardioverter defibrilla<strong>to</strong>r (ICD) has not beenrecommended.Susta<strong>in</strong>ed VT means VT hav<strong>in</strong>g: a cycle length of 500 msec or less, and last<strong>in</strong>g 30 seconds or more or caus<strong>in</strong>g hemodynamic collapse.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: it has been 4 weeks or more s<strong>in</strong>ce their last episode, and they have been successfully treated with radiofrequency ablationplus a one week wait<strong>in</strong>g period or successful pharmacologictreatment.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least 4 weeks s<strong>in</strong>ce their last episode, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates they have been successfullytreated with radiofrequency ablation or pharmacologic treatment.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess annually.177


17.20 Commercial drivers who have susta<strong>in</strong>ed VT and an LVEF of


17.21 Commercial drivers who have susta<strong>in</strong>ed VT and an LVEF of > 30%ApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers who have susta<strong>in</strong>ed ventricular tachycardia (VT)with: a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of > 30%no associated impaired level of consciousness, andan implantable cardioverter defibrilla<strong>to</strong>r (ICD) has not beenrecommended.Susta<strong>in</strong>ed VT means VT hav<strong>in</strong>g: a cycle length of 500 msec or less, and last<strong>in</strong>g 30 seconds or more or caus<strong>in</strong>g hemodynamic collapse.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: it has been 3 months or more s<strong>in</strong>ce their last episode, and they have been successfully treated with radiofrequency ablationplus a one week wait<strong>in</strong>g period or successful pharmacologictreatment.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least 3 months s<strong>in</strong>ce their last episode, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates they have been successfullytreated with radiofrequency ablation or pharmacologic treatment.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess annually.179


17.22 Private and commercial drivers who have non-susta<strong>in</strong>ed VTApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have non-susta<strong>in</strong>ed ventriculartachycardia (VT). Non-susta<strong>in</strong>ed VT means VT hav<strong>in</strong>g: a cycle length of 500 msec or less, and last<strong>in</strong>g less than 30 seconds without hemodynamic collapse.OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.No restrictions.Individuals are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If there is no underly<strong>in</strong>g cardiovascular disease, no re-assessment isrequired, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-related re-assessment.Where there is an underly<strong>in</strong>g cardiovascular disease, OSMV will reassessaccord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the guidel<strong>in</strong>es for that condition.180


17.23 Private and commercial drivers who have had paroxysmal SVT, AF or AFLApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have had paroxysmal: supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) atrial fibrillation (AF), or atrial flutter (AFL)with no associated impaired level of consciousness.OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.Individuals may drive.Individuals are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> five years. If there have been no furtheroccurrences at that time, no further re-assessment is required, unlessrout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-related re-assessment applies.181


17.24 Private and commercial drivers who have had paroxysmal SVT, AF or AFLwith impaired consciousnessApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessment guidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for private andcommercial drivers who have had paroxysmal: supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) atrial fibrillation (AF), or atrial flutter (AFL)with an associated impaired level of consciousness.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: they have been on medical therapy for a m<strong>in</strong>imum of 3 months with norecurrence of paroxysmal SVT, AF or AFL with impaired level ofconsciousness, or their SVT for <strong>in</strong>dividuals with paroxysmal SVT, it has been successfully treatedwith radiofrequency ablation for <strong>in</strong>dividuals with paroxysmal AF, they have had AV node ablationand pacemaker implantation, and for <strong>in</strong>dividuals with paroxysmal AFL, they have had a successfulisthmus ablation with proven establishment of bidirectional isthmusblock.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if:they have been on medical therapy for a m<strong>in</strong>imum of 3 months with norecurrence of paroxysmal SVT, AF, or AFL with impaired level ofconsciousnessfor drivers with paroxysmal SVT, it has been successfully treated withradiofrequency ablationfor drivers with paroxysmal AF, they have had AV node ablation andpacemaker implantation, andfor drivers with paroxysmal AFL, they have had a successful isthmusablation with proven establishment of bidirectional isthmus blockNo conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> five years. If there have been no furtheroccurrences at that time, no further re-assessment is required, unless rout<strong>in</strong>ecommercial or age-related re-assessment applies. For <strong>in</strong>dividuals who havehad pacemaker implantation, the re-assessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es under 17.29apply.182


17.25 Private and commercial drivers who have persistent or permanentparoxysmal SVT, AF or AFLApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have persistent or permanentparoxysmal: supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) atrial fibrillation (AF), or atrial flutter (AFL).If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: they have adequate ventricular rate control, and they do not experience an impaired level of consciousness.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they have adequate ventricular rate control, and they do not experience an impaired level of consciousness.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess every five years, unless rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial orage-related re-assessment applies.183


17.26 Private and commercial drivers who have s<strong>in</strong>us node dysfunctionApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have s<strong>in</strong>us node dysfunction.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may be found fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they have no associated symp<strong>to</strong>ms, or where they have associated symp<strong>to</strong>ms, the s<strong>in</strong>us node dysfunctionhas been successfully treated with a pacemaker and they meet theguidel<strong>in</strong>es for that treatmentOSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they have no associated symp<strong>to</strong>ms, or where they have associated symp<strong>to</strong>ms, the s<strong>in</strong>us node dysfunctionhas been successfully treated with a pacemaker and they meet theguidel<strong>in</strong>es for that treatmentNo conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess every five years, unless rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial orage-related re-assessment applies.184


17.27 Private drivers with atrioventricular (AV) or <strong>in</strong>traventricular blockApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers with an atrioventricular (AV) or <strong>in</strong>traventricular block.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals with an: isolated first degree AV block isolated right bundle branch block (RBBB), or isolated left anterior or posterior fascicular blockmay drive.Individuals with a: left bundle branch block (LBBB) bifascicular block second degree AV block/Mobitz I first degree AV block + bifascicular block, or congenital third degree AV blockmay drive if they have had no associated impaired level ofconsciousness.Individuals with a: second degree AV block; Mobitz II (distal AV block) alternat<strong>in</strong>g LBBB and RBBB, or acquired third degree AV blockmay not drive.*For each of these scenarios; if a permanent pacemaker isimplanted, the recommendations <strong>in</strong> 17.29 prevailOSMVdeterm<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esIndividuals with an: isolated first degree AV block isolated right bundle branch block (RBBB), or isolated left anterior or posterior fascicular blockmay drive.185


Individuals with a: left bundle branch block (LBBB) bifascicular block second degree AV block/Mobitz I first degree AV block + bifascicular block, or congenital third degree AV blockmay drive if they have had no associated impaired level ofconsciousness.Individuals with a: second degree AV block; Mobitz II (distal AV block) alternat<strong>in</strong>g LBBB and RBBB, or acquired third degree AV blockmay not drive.*If a permanent pacemaker is implanted, the recommendations<strong>in</strong> 17.29 prevailConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esNo conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess every five years, unless rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related reassessmentapplies.186


17.28 Commercial drivers with atrioventricular (AV) or <strong>in</strong>traventricular blockApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers with an atrioventricular (AV) or <strong>in</strong>traventricularblock.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals with an: isolated first degree AV block isolated right bundle branch block (RBBB), or isolated left anterior or posterior fascicular blockmay drive.Individuals with a: left bundle branch block (LBBB) bifascicular block second degree AV block/Mobitz I first degree AV block + bifascicular block, or congenital third degree AV blockmay drive if: they have had no associated impaired level of consciousness, and they have an annual Holter show<strong>in</strong>g no higher grade AV block.Individuals with a congenital third degree AV block may drive if: they have had no associated impaired level of consciousness they have a QRS duration < 110 msec, and they have an annual Holter show<strong>in</strong>g no documented pauses > 3seconds.Individuals with a: second degree AV block; Mobitz II (distal AV block) alternat<strong>in</strong>g LBBB and RBBB, or acquired third degree AV blockmay not drive.*For each of the scenarios, if a permanent pacemaker isimplanted, the recommendations <strong>in</strong> 17.30 prevail.187


Individuals with an: isolated first degree AV block isolated right bundle branch block (RBBB), or isolated left anterior or posterior fascicular blockmay drive.OSMVdeterm<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esIndividuals with a: left bundle branch block (LBBB) bifascicular block second degree AV block/Mobitz I first degree AV block + bifascicular block, or congenital third degree AV blockmay drive if: they have had no associated impaired level of consciousness, and they have an annual Holter show<strong>in</strong>g no higher grade AV block.Individuals with a congenital third degree AV block may drive if: they have had no associated impaired level of consciousness they have a QRS duration < 110 msec, and they have an annual Holter show<strong>in</strong>g no documented pauses > 3seconds.Individuals with a: second degree AV block; Mobitz II (distal AV block) alternat<strong>in</strong>g LBBB and RBBB, or acquired third degree AV blockmay not drive.*For each of the scenarios, if a permanent pacemaker isimplanted, the recommendations <strong>in</strong> 17.30 prevailConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esNo conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> accordance with rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial reassessment.188


17.29 Private drivers with permanent pacemakersApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers with permanent pacemakers.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: it has been at least 1 week s<strong>in</strong>ce pacemaker implant they have not experienced any episodes of impaired level ofconsciousness s<strong>in</strong>ce the implant they show normal sens<strong>in</strong>g and capture on a post-implant ECG,and they have their pacemaker checked regularly at a pacemakercl<strong>in</strong>ic and the checks reveal no pacemaker malfunction.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least 1 week s<strong>in</strong>ce pacemaker implant they have not experienced any episodes of impaired level ofconsciousness s<strong>in</strong>ce the implant they show normal sens<strong>in</strong>g and capture on a post-implant ECG,and they have their pacemaker checked regularly at a pacemakercl<strong>in</strong>ic and the checks reveal no pacemaker malfunctionNo conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess every five years, unless rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related reassessmentapplies.189


17.30 Commercial drivers with permanent pacemakersApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers with permanent pacemakers.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: it has been at least 1 month s<strong>in</strong>ce pacemaker implant they have not experienced any episodes of impaired level ofconsciousness s<strong>in</strong>ce the implant they show normal sens<strong>in</strong>g and capture on a post-implant ECG,and they have their pacemaker checked regularly at a pacemakercl<strong>in</strong>ic and the checks reveal no pacemaker malfunction.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least 1 month s<strong>in</strong>ce pacemaker implant they have not experienced any episodes of impaired level ofconsciousness s<strong>in</strong>ce the implant they show normal sens<strong>in</strong>g and capture on a post-implant ECG,and they have their pacemaker checked regularly at a pacemakercl<strong>in</strong>ic and the checks reveal no pacemaker malfunction.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> accordance with rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial reassessment.190


17.31 Private drivers who have decl<strong>in</strong>ed an ICD or have an ICD implanted asprimary prophylaxisApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who: have had an implantable cardioverter defibrilla<strong>to</strong>r (ICD)implanted as a primary prophylaxis, or have decl<strong>in</strong>ed an ICD recommended as primary prophylaxisWhen implanted as a primary prophylaxis, the ICD is implanted <strong>to</strong>prevent sudden cardiac death <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals considered <strong>to</strong> be at highrisk but who have not had an episode of ventricular arrhythmia.Individuals whose ICD also regulates pac<strong>in</strong>g for bradycardia mustalso meet the guidel<strong>in</strong>es for permanent pacemakers outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 17.29If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: they are assessed as NYHA Class I, II or III it has been at least 4 weeks s<strong>in</strong>ce ICD implant (if applicable), and they have their ICD checked regularly at a device cl<strong>in</strong>ic and thechecks reveal no ICD malfunction.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they are assessed as NYHA Class I, II or III, and if they have been treated with an ICD:- there is no evidence of ICD malfunction, and- they have not suffered an impaired level of consciousness ordisability as a result of delivery of ICD therapy with<strong>in</strong> the pastsix months.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g condition on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who hasbeen treated with an ICD and is found fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV if you suffer an impaired level ofconsciousness or disability as a result of delivery of ICD therapy.No restrictions are required.If the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s condition is controlled and stable, OSMV will reassessevery five years, unless a shorter period is recommended bythe treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment applies.191


17.32 Private drivers who have an ICD implanted as secondary prophylaxis forsusta<strong>in</strong>ed VTThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for private driverswho have had an implantable cardioverter defibrilla<strong>to</strong>r (ICD) implanted as asecondary prophylaxis for susta<strong>in</strong>ed VT with no impaired level ofconsciousness.ApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esWhen implanted as a secondary prophylaxis, the ICD is implanted <strong>to</strong>prevent sudden cardiac death <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals who have survived a cardiacarrest or who suffer from malignant arrhythmias that do not respond readily<strong>to</strong> medical treatment.Individuals whose ICD also regulates pac<strong>in</strong>g for bradycardia must also meetthe guidel<strong>in</strong>es for permanent pacemakers outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 17.29.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: they are assessed as NYHA Class I, II or III it has been at least 1 week s<strong>in</strong>ce ICD implant it has been 3 months or more s<strong>in</strong>ce their last episode of susta<strong>in</strong>ed VT,and they have their ICD checked regularly at an ICD cl<strong>in</strong>ic and the checksreveal no ICD malfunction.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they are assessed as NYHA Class I, II or III it has been at least 3 months s<strong>in</strong>ce their last episode of susta<strong>in</strong>ed VT there is no evidence of ICD malfunction, and they have not suffered an impaired level of consciousness or disabilityas a result of delivery of ICD therapy with<strong>in</strong> the past six months.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g condition on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who has beentreated with an ICD and is found fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV if you suffer an impaired level ofconsciousness or disability as a result of delivery of ICD therapy.No restrictions are required.If the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s condition is controlled and stable, OSMV will re-assessevery five years, unless a shorter period is recommended by the treat<strong>in</strong>gphysician or rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment applies.192


17.33 Private drivers where ICD therapy (shock or ATP) has been deliveredApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers where ICD therapy (shock or ATP) has been delivered andthere is an associated impaired level of consciousness, or the therapydelivered by the device was disabl<strong>in</strong>g.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if it has been at least 6 months s<strong>in</strong>ce the event.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if it has been at least sixmonths s<strong>in</strong>ce the event.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g condition on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV if you suffer an impaired level ofconsciousness or disability as a result of delivery of ICD therapy.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> accordance with the re-assessment guidel<strong>in</strong>esfor the underly<strong>in</strong>g cardiovascular condition.193


17.34 Private drivers who have an ICD implanted as secondary prophylaxis for VFor VTThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have had an implantable cardioverter defibrilla<strong>to</strong>r (ICD)implanted as a secondary prophylaxis for VF or VT with an impairedlevel of consciousness.ApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esWhen implanted as a secondary prophylaxis, the ICD is implanted <strong>to</strong>prevent sudden cardiac death <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals who have survived acardiac arrest or who suffer from malignant arrhythmias that do notrespond readily <strong>to</strong> medical treatment.Individuals whose ICD also regulates pac<strong>in</strong>g for bradycardia mustalso meet the guidel<strong>in</strong>es for permanent pacemakers outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 17.29.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if it has been at least 6 months s<strong>in</strong>ce their lastepisode of susta<strong>in</strong>ed symp<strong>to</strong>matic VT or syncope judged <strong>to</strong> be likelydue <strong>to</strong> VT or cardiac arrest.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least 6 months s<strong>in</strong>ce their last episode of susta<strong>in</strong>edsymp<strong>to</strong>matic VT or syncope judged <strong>to</strong> be likely due <strong>to</strong> VT orcardiac arrest there is no evidence of ICD malfunction, and they have not suffered an impaired level of consciousness ordisability as a result of delivery of ICD therapy with<strong>in</strong> the past sixmonths.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g condition on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who hasbeen treated with an ICD and is found fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV if you suffer an impaired level ofconsciousness or disability as a result of delivery of ICD therapy.No restrictions are required.If the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s condition is controlled and stable, OSMV will reassessevery five years, unless a shorter period is recommended bythe treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment applies.194


17.35 Commercial drivers who have decl<strong>in</strong>ed an ICD or have an ICD implanted asprimary or secondary prophylaxisApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers who: have had an implantable cardioverter defibrilla<strong>to</strong>r (ICD)implanted as a primary prophylaxis, or have decl<strong>in</strong>ed an ICD recommended as primary prophylaxisWhen implanted as a primary prophylaxis, the ICD is implanted <strong>to</strong>prevent sudden cardiac death <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals considered <strong>to</strong> be at highrisk but who have not had an episode of ventricular arrhythmia.Individuals whose ICD also regulates pac<strong>in</strong>g for bradycardia mustalso meet the guidel<strong>in</strong>es for permanent pacemakers outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 1.30.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals generally may not drive. However, an ICD maysometimes be implanted <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual with a low risk of sudden<strong>in</strong>capacitation. Where this is the case, <strong>in</strong>dividuals may drive if anassessment by a cardiologist <strong>in</strong>dicates that the annual risk of sudden<strong>in</strong>capacitation is 1% or less.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if an assessment by acardiologist <strong>in</strong>dicates that the annual risk of sudden <strong>in</strong>capacitation is1% or less.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess annually.195


17.36 Private drivers with <strong>in</strong>herited heart diseaseApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers with the follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>herited heart diseases: Brugada’s Syndrome Long QT Syndrome, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: their condition has been <strong>in</strong>vestigated and treated by a cardiologist,and it has been at least 6 months s<strong>in</strong>ce they have experienced anyevent caus<strong>in</strong>g an impaired level of consciousnessOSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: their condition has been <strong>in</strong>vestigated and treated by a cardiologist,and it has been at least 6 months s<strong>in</strong>ce they have experienced anyevent caus<strong>in</strong>g an impaired level of consciousnessNo conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess annually or more frequently as recommendedby the driver’s cardiologist.196


17.37 Commercial drivers with <strong>in</strong>herited heart diseaseApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers with the follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>herited heart diseases: Brugada’s Syndrome Long QT Syndrome, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals generally may not drive. However, <strong>in</strong>herited heartdiseases may sometimes pose a very low risk of sudden<strong>in</strong>capacitation. Where this is the case, <strong>in</strong>dividuals may drive if amedical assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that the annual risk of sudden<strong>in</strong>capacitation is 1% or less.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if an assessment by acardiologist <strong>in</strong>dicates that the annual risk of sudden <strong>in</strong>capacitation is1% or less.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess annually.197


17.38 Private drivers with medically treated valvular heart diseaseApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers with medically treated: aortic stenosis aortic regurgitation mitral stenosis, or mitral regurgitation.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: they are assessed as NYHA Class I or II, and they have had no episodes of impaired level of consciousnessOSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they are assessed as NYHA Class I or II, and they have had no episodes of impaired level of consciousnessNo conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess every five years, unless rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related reassessmentapplies.198


17.39 Commercial drivers with medically treated aortic stenosis or sclerosisApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers with medically treated: aortic stenosis, or aortic sclerosisIf further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: they are assessed as NYHA Class I their condition is asymp<strong>to</strong>matic they have an aortic valve area (AVA) > 1.0 cm 2 they have a left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) > 35% they have had a detailed assessment by a cardiologist, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gan assessment for risk of syncope, and they have an annual re-assessment.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they are assessed as NYHA Class I their condition is asymp<strong>to</strong>matic they have an aortic valve area (AVA) > 1.0 cm 2 they have a left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) > 35% they have had a detailed assessment by a cardiologist, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gan assessment for risk of syncope, and they have an annual re-assessment.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess annually.199


17.40 Commercial drivers with medically treated aortic or mitral regurgitation ormitral stenosisApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers with medically treated: aortic regurgitation mitral stenosis, or mitral regurgitation.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: they are assessed as NYHA Class I they have an left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) > 35%, and they have had no episodes of impaired level of consciousness.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they are assessed as NYHA Class I they have an left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) > 35%, and they have had no episodes of impaired level of consciousness.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> accordance with rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial reassessment.200


17.41 Private drivers with surgically treated valvular heart diseaseApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers with: mechanical prostheses mitral bioprostheses with non-s<strong>in</strong>us rhythm mitral valve repair with non-s<strong>in</strong>us rhythm aortic bioprostheses mitral bioprostheses with s<strong>in</strong>us rhythm, or mitral valve repair with s<strong>in</strong>us rhythm.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: it has been at least 6 weeks s<strong>in</strong>ce their discharge follow<strong>in</strong>gtreatment they have no thromboembolic complications, and for <strong>in</strong>dividuals with mechanical prostheses, mitral bioprostheseswith non-s<strong>in</strong>us rhythm or mitral valve repair with non-s<strong>in</strong>usrhythm, they are on anti-coagulant therapy.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least 6 weeks s<strong>in</strong>ce their discharge follow<strong>in</strong>gtreatment they have no thromboembolic complications, and for <strong>in</strong>dividuals with mechanical prostheses, mitral bioprostheseswith non-s<strong>in</strong>us rhythm or mitral valve repair with non-s<strong>in</strong>usrhythm, they are on anti-coagulant therapy.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess every five years, unless rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related reassessmentapplies.201


17.42 Commercial drivers with surgically treated valvular heart diseaseApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers with: mechanical prostheses mitral bioprostheses with non-s<strong>in</strong>us rhythm mitral valve repair with non-s<strong>in</strong>us rhythm aortic bioprostheses mitral bioprostheses with s<strong>in</strong>us rhythm, or mitral valve repair with s<strong>in</strong>us rhythm.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: it has been at least 3 months s<strong>in</strong>ce their discharge follow<strong>in</strong>gtreatment they have no thromboembolic complications they are assessed as NYHA Class I they have an LVEF > 35%, and for <strong>in</strong>dividuals with mechanical prostheses, mitral bioprostheseswith non-s<strong>in</strong>us rhythm or mitral valve repair with non-s<strong>in</strong>usrhythm, they are on anti-coagulant therapy.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least 3 months s<strong>in</strong>ce their discharge follow<strong>in</strong>gtreatment they have no thromboembolic complications they are assessed as NYHA Class I they have an LVEF > 35%, and for <strong>in</strong>dividuals with mechanical prostheses, mitral bioprostheseswith non-s<strong>in</strong>us rhythm or mitral valve repair with non-s<strong>in</strong>usrhythm, they are on anti-coagulant therapy.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> accordance with rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial reassessment.202


17.43 Private drivers with mitral valve prolapseApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers with mitral valve prolapse.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.No restrictions.Individuals are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If the condition is longstand<strong>in</strong>g and asymp<strong>to</strong>matic, no re-assessmentis required. Otherwise, OSMV will re-assess every 5 years, unlessrout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment applies.203


17.44 Commercial drivers with mitral valve prolapseApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers with mitral valve prolapse.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if they are asymp<strong>to</strong>matic. Individuals who aresymp<strong>to</strong>matic may drive if: they have been assessed for arrhythmia with a Holter, and they meet any applicable guidel<strong>in</strong>es related <strong>to</strong> arrhythmias.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if:they are asymp<strong>to</strong>matic, orwhere they are symp<strong>to</strong>matic they have been assessed forarrhythmia with a Holter, and they meet any applicable guidel<strong>in</strong>esrelated <strong>to</strong> arrhythmias.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> accordance with rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial reassessment.204


17.45 Private drivers with congestive heart failure*If a Left Ventricular Assist Device is implanted, see 17.45.1ApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for private driverswith congestive heart failure.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.If cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicates possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMV willrequest a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment.<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleIf the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates concerns regard<strong>in</strong>g a lack of stam<strong>in</strong>a orgeneral debility, OSMV will request an IC<strong>BC</strong> road test.Individuals may drive if: they are assessed as NYHA Class I, II, or III they are not receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termittent <strong>in</strong>otropes, and they have sufficient cognitive function <strong>to</strong> drive.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they are assessed as NYHA Class I, II, or III they are not receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termittent <strong>in</strong>otropes, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g does not <strong>in</strong>dicate possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g or, wherethe treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, afunctional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have the functional abilityrequired <strong>to</strong> drive a private vehicle.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates possible cognitiveimpairment, OSMV will re-assess annually. Otherwise, OSMV will reassessevery 5 years or <strong>in</strong> accordance with rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related reassessment,unless more frequent re-assessment is recommended by thetreat<strong>in</strong>g physician.In addition <strong>to</strong> the CCS recommendations for congenital heart failure, whichaddress the risk of episodic impairment, these guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>clude additionalrequirements <strong>to</strong> address potential persistent impairments associated with thecondition.205


17.45.1 Private drivers with Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD)implantationApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers with who have a LVAD implanted.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request an assessment from a cardiologist.If cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessaryfor driv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicates possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMVwill request a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates concerns regard<strong>in</strong>g a lack of stam<strong>in</strong>aor general debility, OSMV will request an IC<strong>BC</strong> road test.Individuals may be found fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: a cont<strong>in</strong>uous flow LVAD has been implanted they are stable two months post implant they are NYHA Class I-III they are not receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termittent <strong>in</strong>otropesOSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they have a cont<strong>in</strong>uous flow LVAD implanted they have been deemed stable two months post implant by thetreat<strong>in</strong>g cardiologist they have been assessed as NYHA Class I, II, or III they are not receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termittent <strong>in</strong>otropes the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g does not <strong>in</strong>dicatepossible impairment of the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g or, where the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>dicates possible impairment of the cognitive functions necessaryfor driv<strong>in</strong>g, a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have thefunctional ability required <strong>to</strong> drive a private vehicle.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g condition on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who hasbeen treated with a LVAD and is found fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV if you suffer any device relatedcomplications result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an impaired level of consciousness ordisability.No restrictions are required.These guidel<strong>in</strong>es are consistent with the 2012 CCS Position StatementUpdate on Assessment of the Cardiac Patient for <strong>Fitness</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Drive</strong>:<strong>Fitness</strong> Follow<strong>in</strong>g Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.206


17.46 Commercial drivers with congestive heart failureApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers with congestive heart failure.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.If cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessaryfor driv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicates possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMVwill request a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment.<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esIf the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates concerns regard<strong>in</strong>g a lack ofstam<strong>in</strong>a or general debility, OSMV will request an IC<strong>BC</strong> road test.Individuals may be found fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they are assessed as NYHA Class I, or II they have an LVEF > 35% they are not receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termittent <strong>in</strong>otropes they are not us<strong>in</strong>g a left ventricle assist device, and they have sufficient cognitive function <strong>to</strong> drive.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they are assessed as NYHA Class I, or II they have an LVEF > 35% they are not receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termittent <strong>in</strong>otropes they are not us<strong>in</strong>g a left ventricle assist device, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g does not <strong>in</strong>dicatepossible impairment of the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g or, where the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>dicates possible impairment of the cognitive functionsnecessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that theyhave the functional ability required <strong>to</strong> drive a private vehicle.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates possiblecognitive impairment, OSMV will re-assess annually. Otherwise,OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> accordance with rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial re-207


Policy rationaleassessment, unless more frequent re-assessment is recommended bythe treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.In addition <strong>to</strong> the CCS recommendations for congenital heart failure,which address the risk of episodic impairment, these guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>in</strong>clude additional requirements <strong>to</strong> address potential persistentimpairments associated with the condition.208


17.47 Private drivers with left ventricular dysfunction or cardiomyopathyApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers with left ventricular dysfunction or cardiomyopathy.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: they are assessed as NYHA Class I, II, or III they are not receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termittent <strong>in</strong>otropes, and they are not us<strong>in</strong>g a left ventricle assist device.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they are assessed as NYHA Class I, II, or III they are not receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termittent <strong>in</strong>otropes, and they are not us<strong>in</strong>g a left ventricle assist device.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess every 5 years or <strong>in</strong> accordance with rout<strong>in</strong>e agerelatedre-assessment, unless more frequent re-assessment isrecommended by the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.209


17.48 Commercial drivers with left ventricular dysfunction or cardiomyopathyApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers with left ventricular dysfunction orcardiomyopathy.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: they are assessed as NYHA Class I, or II they have an LVEF > 35% they are not receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termittent <strong>in</strong>otropes, and they are not us<strong>in</strong>g a left ventricle assist device.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they are assessed as NYHA Class I, or II they have an LVEF > 35% they are not receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termittent <strong>in</strong>otropes, and they are not us<strong>in</strong>g a left ventricle assist device.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> accordance with rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial reassessment,unless more frequent re-assessment is recommended bythe treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.210


17.49 Private drivers with a heart transplantApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have had a heart transplant.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: it has been at least 6 weeks s<strong>in</strong>ce their discharge follow<strong>in</strong>gtransplant they are assessed as NYHA Class I or II they are on stable immunotherapy, and they have an annual re-assessment.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least 6 weeks s<strong>in</strong>ce their discharge follow<strong>in</strong>gtransplant they are assessed as NYHA Class I or II they are on stable immunotherapy, and they have an annual re-assessment.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess every 5 years if the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s condition iscontrolled, stable and asymp<strong>to</strong>matic. Otherwise, OSMV will reassessas recommended by the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.211


17.50 Commercial drivers with a heart transplantApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers who have had a heart transplant.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: it has been at least 6 months s<strong>in</strong>ce their discharge follow<strong>in</strong>gtransplant they are assessed as NYHA Class I they have an LVEF > 35% they are on stable immunotherapy, and they have an annual re-assessment, which <strong>in</strong>cludes a non-<strong>in</strong>vasivetest of ischemic burden show<strong>in</strong>g no evidence of active ischemia.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least 6 months s<strong>in</strong>ce their discharge follow<strong>in</strong>gtransplant they are assessed as NYHA Class I they have an LVEF > 35% they are on stable immunotherapy, and they have an annual re-assessment, which <strong>in</strong>cludes a non-<strong>in</strong>vasivetest of ischemic burden show<strong>in</strong>g no evidence of active ischemiaNo conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> accordance with rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial reassessment,unless more frequent re-assessment is recommended bythe treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.212


17.51 Private drivers with hypertrophic cardiomyopathyApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if they have had no episodes of impaired levelof consciousnessOSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they have had no episodes of impaired level of consciousnessNo conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess annually until the condition is controlled andstable and then every five years, unless rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related reassessmentapplies.213


17.52 Commercial drivers with hypertrophic cardiomyopathyApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers who have hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a cardiologist.Individuals may drive if: they have had no episodes of impaired level of consciousness they have no family his<strong>to</strong>ry of sudden death at a young age they have left ventricle wall thickness of < 30 mm they show no <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> blood pressure with exercise, and they have an annual Holter show<strong>in</strong>g no non-susta<strong>in</strong>ed VT.OSMV may <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if:they have had no episodes of impaired level of consciousnessthey have no family his<strong>to</strong>ry of sudden death at a young agethey have left ventricle wall thickness of < 30 mmthey show no <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> blood pressure with exercise, andthey have an annual Holter show<strong>in</strong>g no non-susta<strong>in</strong>ed VT,No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess annually until the condition is controlled andstable and then <strong>in</strong> accordance with rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial re-assessment.214


17.53 SyncopeSee the guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> Chapter 22, Syncope.17.54 Private and commercial drivers with hypertensionApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have hypertension.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physicianIndividuals with a susta<strong>in</strong>ed blood pressure of less than 170/110mmHg may drive. Individuals with persistent blood pressure of170/110 mmHg or higher may drive if they have no co-morbidconditions that impair their functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: They have a susta<strong>in</strong>ed blood pressure of less than 170/110 mmHgIndividuals with persistent blood pressure of 170/110 mmHg orhigher may drive if they have no co-morbid conditions that impairtheir functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.No re-assessment is required, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or agerelatedre-assessment, if the condition is stable and the <strong>in</strong>dividual isasymp<strong>to</strong>matic and compliant with treatment. Otherwise, OSMV willre-assess as recommended by the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.Hypertension is not specifically addressed <strong>in</strong> the CCSrecommendations. <strong>Drive</strong>rs who have significant hypertension are atrisk for develop<strong>in</strong>g co-morbid conditions that may affect fitness <strong>to</strong>drive, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g damage <strong>to</strong> the heart, eyes, kidneys, and bra<strong>in</strong>.215


17.55 CCS recommendations regard<strong>in</strong>g transient conditionsWait<strong>in</strong>g periodsThe wait<strong>in</strong>g periods <strong>in</strong> these recommendations refer <strong>to</strong> the time <strong>in</strong>terval follow<strong>in</strong>g onset of thereferenced cardiac condition or event dur<strong>in</strong>g which it is recommended that an <strong>in</strong>dividual does notdrive. These recommendations are <strong>in</strong>tended <strong>to</strong> mitigate the risk of an episodic impairment offunctional ability <strong>to</strong> drive.Recurrence of the referenced cardiac condition or event dur<strong>in</strong>g a wait<strong>in</strong>g period resets thewait<strong>in</strong>g period.If more than one wait<strong>in</strong>g period applies (because of multiple conditions/events) thelonger wait<strong>in</strong>g period should be applied, unless otherwise stated.A. Coronary artery diseaseAcute coronary syndromes – wait<strong>in</strong>g periodsPrivateCommercialST elevation MINon-ST elevation MI with significant LVdamage1 month afterdischarge3 months afterdischargeNon-ST elevation MI with m<strong>in</strong>or LVdamageIf PCI performed dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itialhospital stay 48 hours after PCI 7 days after PCIIf PCI not performed dur<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>itial hospital stay7 days afterdischarge30 days afterdischargeAcute coronary syndrome without MI(unstable ang<strong>in</strong>a)If PCI performed dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itialhospital stay 48 hours after PCI 7 days after PCIIf PCI not performed dur<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>itial hospital stay7 days afterdischarge30 days afterdischargeNotes:ST elevation: refers <strong>to</strong> the appearance of the ST segment of an electrocardiogram (ECGor EKG)MI: Myocardial <strong>in</strong>farction (heart attack)LV: left ventricleSignificant LV damage: any MI which is not classified as m<strong>in</strong>orM<strong>in</strong>or LV damage: an MI def<strong>in</strong>ed only by elevated tropon<strong>in</strong> + ECG changes and <strong>in</strong> theabsence of a new wall motion abnormality.216


Stable coronary syndromes – wait<strong>in</strong>g periodsStable ang<strong>in</strong>aAsymp<strong>to</strong>matic coronary artery diseasePrivateNo restrictionsCommercialPCI 48 hours after PCI 7 days after PCINotes:PCI: Percutaneous coronary <strong>in</strong>tervention (angioplasty)Cardiac surgery for coronary artery disease – wait<strong>in</strong>g periodsPrivateCoronary artery bypass graft 1 month afterdischargeCommercial3 months afterdischargeB. Disturbances of cardiac rhythm, arrhythmia devices and proceduresCatheter ablation and EPSPrivateCommercialCatheter ablation procedureEPS with no <strong>in</strong>ducible susta<strong>in</strong>edventricular arrhythmias48 hours afterdischarge1 week afterdischargeNotes:EPS: electrophysiology217


C. Disturbances of cardiac rhythm and arrhythmia devicesVentricular arrhythmiasVF with a reversible causeNotes:VF: ventricular fibrillationExamples of reversible causes of VF:VF with<strong>in</strong> 24 hours of myocardial <strong>in</strong>farctionVF dur<strong>in</strong>g coronary angiographyVF with electrocutionVF secondary <strong>to</strong> drug <strong>to</strong>xicityPrivateCommercialNo driv<strong>in</strong>g until/unless successful treatment ofunderly<strong>in</strong>g condition218


Chapter 18: Hear<strong>in</strong>g LossBACKGROUND18.1 About hear<strong>in</strong>g lossHear<strong>in</strong>g loss is categorized as either conductive or sensor<strong>in</strong>eural. Conductive hear<strong>in</strong>g loss<strong>in</strong>volves abnormalities <strong>in</strong> the external or middle ear, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the ear canal, eardrum or ossicles.A blockage or other structural problem <strong>in</strong>terferes with how sound gets conducted through theear, mak<strong>in</strong>g sound levels seem lower. In many cases, conductive hear<strong>in</strong>g loss can be correctedwith medication or surgery.Sensor<strong>in</strong>eural hear<strong>in</strong>g loss typically results from permanent damage <strong>to</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner ear (cochlea) orthe audi<strong>to</strong>ry nerve. Typically, it is gradual, bilateral, and characterized by the loss of highfrequencyhear<strong>in</strong>g. Sensor<strong>in</strong>eural hear<strong>in</strong>g loss is permanent and often is helped with hear<strong>in</strong>gaids. Profound deafness can be treated with cochlear implants.Sensor<strong>in</strong>eural hear<strong>in</strong>g loss accounts for 90% of all hear<strong>in</strong>g loss.18.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of hear<strong>in</strong>g lossThe 2003 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) <strong>in</strong>dicated that 3% of Canadians 12 yearsof age and older have some type of hear<strong>in</strong>g difficulty. The prevalence of hear<strong>in</strong>g loss <strong>in</strong>creaseswith age. In the CCHS, 5% of 65 <strong>to</strong> 69 year-olds reported hear<strong>in</strong>g problems, with the percentage<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> 23% of those 80 and older. Hear<strong>in</strong>g loss is more common <strong>in</strong> men than <strong>in</strong> womenacross every age group.18.3 Hear<strong>in</strong>g loss and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesThe effects of hear<strong>in</strong>g loss on the ability <strong>to</strong> safely operate a mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle are not wellestablished. Although the overall body of literature exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the relationship between hear<strong>in</strong>gloss and driv<strong>in</strong>g is small, s<strong>in</strong>ce the 1990’s there has been an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g amount of research <strong>in</strong> thisarea. The results are equivocal. Some studies report an association between impairments <strong>in</strong>hear<strong>in</strong>g and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes while others have not found an association.Although variability <strong>in</strong> methodology makes it difficult <strong>to</strong> draw conclusions across studies, resultsfrom studies <strong>in</strong>dicate that, for the majority (70%) of study measures, no significant relationshipwas found between hear<strong>in</strong>g loss and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes (e.g. crashes, violations,convictions).219


18.4 Effect of hear<strong>in</strong>g loss on functional ability <strong>to</strong> driveThe effect of hear<strong>in</strong>g loss on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive has not been established. However,ensur<strong>in</strong>g that the horn works, listen<strong>in</strong>g for unusual eng<strong>in</strong>e sounds and listen<strong>in</strong>g for leaks <strong>in</strong> theair brake system are parts of the standard pre-trip vehicle <strong>in</strong>spection rout<strong>in</strong>e that commercialdrivers must complete before each trip.ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessmentapproachPrimaryfunctionalabilityaffectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsHear<strong>in</strong>g lossPersistentImpairment:FunctionalassessmentSensory -Hear<strong>in</strong>g<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportHear<strong>in</strong>g report (seesample form <strong>in</strong> 18.8)IC<strong>BC</strong> pre-trip <strong>in</strong>spectiontest18.5 Compensation<strong>Drive</strong>rs with hear<strong>in</strong>g loss may compensate for this impairment when conduct<strong>in</strong>g pre-trip<strong>in</strong>spections by utiliz<strong>in</strong>g alternative <strong>in</strong>spection techniques, such as putt<strong>in</strong>g water on the air brakel<strong>in</strong>e <strong>to</strong> see if bubbles form due <strong>to</strong> an air leak.220


GUIDELINES18.6 Private drivers with hear<strong>in</strong>g lossApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers with hear<strong>in</strong>g loss.OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.No hear<strong>in</strong>g requirements.Individuals are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.No re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment, isrequired.There is <strong>in</strong>sufficient evidence <strong>to</strong> support a m<strong>in</strong>imum hear<strong>in</strong>grequirement for private drivers.221


18.7 Commercial drivers with hear<strong>in</strong>g lossApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers who are required <strong>to</strong> conduct a pre-trip vehicle<strong>in</strong>spection under s.37.22 of the Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicle Act Regulation.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates a change <strong>in</strong> hear<strong>in</strong>g ability <strong>in</strong> alicensed commercial driver who previously met the hear<strong>in</strong>g standardoutl<strong>in</strong>ed below, OSMV will request an audiometric assessmentconducted by an: o<strong>to</strong>laryngologist audiologist, or hear<strong>in</strong>g cl<strong>in</strong>ic operated by <strong>BC</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health.If the audiometric assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that an <strong>in</strong>dividual does notmeet the hear<strong>in</strong>g standard, OSMV will request an IC<strong>BC</strong> pre-trip<strong>in</strong>spection test.No hear<strong>in</strong>g requirements on <strong>in</strong>itial application for licence<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleAfter <strong>in</strong>itial licens<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dividuals who develop corrected oruncorrected hear<strong>in</strong>g loss greater than 40 dB averaged at 500, 1000,and 2000 Hz <strong>in</strong> their better ear may drive if they successfullycomplete a pre-trip <strong>in</strong>spection test demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g that they are able <strong>to</strong>compensate for their hear<strong>in</strong>g loss.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: their corrected or uncorrected hear<strong>in</strong>g loss is not greater than 40dB averaged at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz <strong>in</strong> their better ear, or if their corrected or uncorrected hear<strong>in</strong>g loss is greater than 40 dBaveraged at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz <strong>in</strong> their better ear, theysuccessfully complete a pre-trip <strong>in</strong>spection test demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g thatthey are able <strong>to</strong> compensate for their hear<strong>in</strong>g loss.No conditions are required.OSMV will place the follow<strong>in</strong>g restriction on an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s licenceif the <strong>in</strong>dividual must wear a hear<strong>in</strong>g aid <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> meet the hear<strong>in</strong>gstandard outl<strong>in</strong>ed above:23 Must wear hear<strong>in</strong>g aidOSMV will place the follow<strong>in</strong>g restriction on an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s licenceif the <strong>in</strong>dividual does not meet the hear<strong>in</strong>g standard outl<strong>in</strong>ed above:51 Visible low air warn<strong>in</strong>g deviceNo re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial re-assessment, isrequired.There is <strong>in</strong>sufficient evidence <strong>to</strong> support a m<strong>in</strong>imum hear<strong>in</strong>g222


equirement for commercial drivers <strong>in</strong> relation <strong>to</strong> operat<strong>in</strong>g a vehicleon the road. However, some elements of the standard pre-trip<strong>in</strong>spection for commercial vehicles <strong>in</strong>volve listen<strong>in</strong>g. Commercialdrivers are required by law <strong>to</strong> regularly conduct a pre-trip <strong>in</strong>spectionprior <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g.Policy rationale cont’d<strong>Drive</strong>rs with hear<strong>in</strong>g loss must be able <strong>to</strong> adequately compensate fortheir hear<strong>in</strong>g loss when complet<strong>in</strong>g a required pre-trip <strong>in</strong>spection.<strong>Drive</strong>rs who have hear<strong>in</strong>g loss at the time they obta<strong>in</strong> theircommercial licence will demonstrate their ability <strong>to</strong> compensate onthe pre-trip <strong>in</strong>spection test prior <strong>to</strong> licens<strong>in</strong>g, and no furtherassessment is required.<strong>Drive</strong>rs who experience hear<strong>in</strong>g loss after obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g their commerciallicence must re-take the pre-trip <strong>in</strong>spection test <strong>to</strong> demonstrate thatthey are able <strong>to</strong> compensate for hear<strong>in</strong>g loss that developed after theirpre-licens<strong>in</strong>g test.223


18.8 Hear<strong>in</strong>g reportOffice of the Super<strong>in</strong>tenden<strong>to</strong>f Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicleswww.pssg.gov.bc.ca/osmvPO BOX 9254 STNPROV GOVTVICTORIA <strong>BC</strong> V8W 9J2Phone: (250) 387-7747Fax: (250) 952-6888HEARING REPORTNote <strong>to</strong> <strong>Drive</strong>r: If you have had a hear<strong>in</strong>g test done with<strong>in</strong> one year prior <strong>to</strong> the date this form was issued, you maysubmit the results of that test. If you require a current hear<strong>in</strong>g test <strong>to</strong> fulfill this requirement, OSMV will pay theservice provider directlyThe personal <strong>in</strong>formation on this form is collected under the authority of the Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicle Act and the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. The <strong>in</strong>formation provided will beused <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e your fitness <strong>to</strong> drive a mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle. Personal <strong>in</strong>formation is protected from unauthorized use and disclosure <strong>in</strong> accordance with the Freedom of Information and Protection ofPrivacy Act and may be disclosed only as provided by that Act. If you have any questions about the collection, use and disclosure of the <strong>in</strong>formation collected, contact the Office of theSuper<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles at (250) 387-7747.THIS REPORT MUST BE COMPLETED IN FULL AND RETURNED WITHIN 30 DAYS TO THE OFFICE OFTHE SUPERINTENDENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES<strong>Drive</strong>r’s Name DL # Date IssuedRECENT UNAIDED AUDIOGRAMIntensity <strong>in</strong> Decibels(dB)RIGHTEARLEFTEARFREQUENCY IN HERTZ (Hz)500 1000 2000If hear<strong>in</strong>g loss is greater than 40 dB <strong>in</strong> the better ear, complete the follow<strong>in</strong>g:RECENT AIDED AUDIOGRAMIntensity <strong>in</strong> Decibels(dB)RIGHTEARLEFTEARFREQUENCY IN HERTZ (Hz)500 1000 2000224


PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: YES NO1. Is hear<strong>in</strong>g loss progressive? 2. Can hear<strong>in</strong>g be corrected with an aid? 3. Was an aid prescribed? EXAMINING AUDIOLOGISTNAME AND ADDRESS (USE RUBBER STAMP OR PRINT)RECOMMENDATIONS - FOR OFFICE USEONLY DOES NOT MEET GUIDELINES MEETS GUIDELINES – NO RESTRICTIONTELEPHONE NUMBER: MEETS GUIDELINES – WITH RESTRICTIONS RESTRICTIONS ADDED 23 37 51SIGNATURE OF AUDIOLOGISTOF EXAMDATENAME (PLEASE PRINT)OFFICE_______________________________________________(YYYY/MM/DD)(YYYY/MM/DD)225


Chapter 19: Psychiatric DisordersBACKGROUND19.1 About psychiatric disordersThe Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) 7 , published by theAmerican Psychiatric Association, conta<strong>in</strong>s a standard classification system of psychiatricdisorders for health care professionals <strong>in</strong> the United States and Canada. It classifies psychiatricdisorders by diagnostic category, based on five axes. The five axes, along with a summary of thediagnostic category for each, and some common disorders fall<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> each axis are provided<strong>in</strong> the table below.Psychiatric Disorders: Axes, Diagnostic Categories and Common Disorders(DSM-IV-TR, American Psychiatric Association, 2000)Axis Diagnostic Category ExamplesAxis I:Axis II:Axis III:Axis IV:Axis V:Cl<strong>in</strong>ical disorders, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gmajor mental disorders, aswell as developmental andlearn<strong>in</strong>g disordersPersonality disorders, as wellas mental retardationAcute medical conditionsand physical disordersPsychosocial andenvironmental fac<strong>to</strong>rscontribut<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> the disorderGlobal assessment ofFunction<strong>in</strong>gDelirium, dementia, and other cognitivedisordersSubstance related disordersMood disorders (major depressive disorder,bipolar disorders, dysthymia)Anxiety disordersAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity DisorderSchizophreniaPersonality disorderso Borderl<strong>in</strong>e Personality Disordero Schizotypal Personality Disordero Anti-social Personality Disordero Narcissistic Personality DisorderDiseases of the nervous, circula<strong>to</strong>ry,musculoskeletal, etc. systemsRelationship, social, educational, occupational,hous<strong>in</strong>g or f<strong>in</strong>ancial problems may precipitateor aggravate a mental disorderA rat<strong>in</strong>g scale, from 0 <strong>to</strong> 100, used <strong>to</strong> report onimpairment due <strong>to</strong> psychiatric disorderThis chapter is concerned with Axis I and Axis II disorders. Axis III focuses on general medicalconditions. Those conditions with relevance <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g safety are addressed <strong>in</strong> other chapters of7 The most recent addition is the DSM-IV-TR, published <strong>in</strong> 2000. Publication of the DSM-V is expected <strong>in</strong> 2012.226


this manual. Axis IV addresses external fac<strong>to</strong>rs that may impact an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s physical orpsychological health and are not addressed <strong>in</strong> this manual. Axis V, the Global Assessment ofFunction<strong>in</strong>g, is a 0 <strong>to</strong> 100 scale used for report<strong>in</strong>g a cl<strong>in</strong>ician’s judgment of an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s levelof psychological, social and occupational function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> light of any impairment due <strong>to</strong>psychiatric disorders. A low score is a red flag for potential impairment of functions necessaryfor driv<strong>in</strong>g.Delirium, dementia, and other cognitive disorders (Axis I)The effects of delirium, dementia, and other cognitive disorders on driv<strong>in</strong>g are covered <strong>in</strong>Chapter 27 of this Manual, Cognitive Impairment <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Dementia.Substance-use disorders (Axis I)Substance-use disorders refer <strong>to</strong> the tak<strong>in</strong>g of a drug of abuse (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g alcohol). Substances<strong>in</strong>clude alcohol, amphetam<strong>in</strong>es, cannabis, coca<strong>in</strong>e, halluc<strong>in</strong>ogens, sedatives, hypnotics, andanxiolytics. The effects of drugs commonly prescribed for medical conditions are addressed <strong>in</strong>Chapter 29, Psychotropic DrugsMood disorders - Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Dysthymia (Axis I)Major Depressive Disorder (s<strong>in</strong>gle episode or recurrent), Bipolar Disorders (Manic, Depressed,or Mixed types), and Dysthymic Disorder are collectively referred <strong>to</strong> as mood disorders.Major Depressive Disorder is characterized by one or more episodes of depressed mood or lossof <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> usual activities, as well as four additional symp<strong>to</strong>ms of depression, with theepisodes last<strong>in</strong>g for two or more weeks. Additional symp<strong>to</strong>ms of depression <strong>in</strong>clude: change <strong>in</strong> appetite sleep disturbances decreased energy or fatigue sense of worthlessness or guilt, and poor concentration or difficulty mak<strong>in</strong>g decisions.Bipolar Disorder is characterized by one or more manic or mixed (manic and depression)episodes, with or without a his<strong>to</strong>ry of major depression.Dysthymic Disorder is def<strong>in</strong>ed as a chronically depressed mood over a period of at least twoyears.227


Anxiety disorders (Axis I)There are a number of anxiety disorders classified <strong>in</strong> the DSM-IV-TR, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: Generalized Anxiety Disorder specific phobias Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Social Phobia Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, and Panic Disorder.Symp<strong>to</strong>ms <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>tense and prolonged feel<strong>in</strong>gs of fear or distress that occur out of proportion<strong>to</strong> the actual threat or danger. The feel<strong>in</strong>gs of distress also must be sufficient <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>terfere withnormal daily function<strong>in</strong>g.Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (Axis I)Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is characterized by <strong>in</strong>appropriate degrees of<strong>in</strong>attention, impulsivity, and over-activity that beg<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> childhood. ADHD is one of the mostcommon neurobehavioral disorders of childhood and can persist through adolescence and <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong>adulthood.Although many <strong>in</strong>dividuals with ADHD show symp<strong>to</strong>ms of both <strong>in</strong>attention and hyperactivityimpulsivity,there may be a predom<strong>in</strong>ance of either <strong>in</strong>attention or hyperactivity-impulsivity. Thisvariability of presentation is reflected <strong>in</strong> the three major classifications of the disorder: Comb<strong>in</strong>ed Type (exhibit<strong>in</strong>g both <strong>in</strong>attention and hyperactivity-impulsivity) Predom<strong>in</strong>ately Inattentive Type, and Predom<strong>in</strong>ately Hyperactivity-Impulsivity Type.The symp<strong>to</strong>ms of hyperactivity and impulsivity tend <strong>to</strong> dim<strong>in</strong>ish over time so that many adultswill present with primary symp<strong>to</strong>ms of <strong>in</strong>attention only.Schizophrenia (Axis I)The effects of Schizophrenia on the <strong>in</strong>dividual can be profound. Common symp<strong>to</strong>ms <strong>in</strong>cludedelusions and halluc<strong>in</strong>ations, thought disorders, lack of motivation, and social withdrawal. Thesymp<strong>to</strong>ms of Schizophrenia are generally divided <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> three broad categories 8 : Positive or “psychotic” symp<strong>to</strong>ms are characterized by abnormal thoughts or behaviours.For example, halluc<strong>in</strong>ations are disturbances of perception where <strong>in</strong>dividuals hear or seeth<strong>in</strong>gs that are not there. Disorganised symp<strong>to</strong>ms are characterized by poorly organized, illogical or bizarre thoughtprocesses. These disturbances <strong>in</strong> logical thought processes frequently produce observablepatterns of behaviour that are also disorganized and bizarre.8 Monash Report 213, April 2004, pg. 272-73228


Negative symp<strong>to</strong>ms are characterized by the absence of thoughts and behaviours that wouldotherwise be expected. This may be manifested as limited ability <strong>to</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k abstractly, <strong>to</strong>express emotion, <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiate activities, or <strong>to</strong> become motivated.The onset of Schizophrenia can occur at any age, but most typically appears <strong>in</strong> early adulthood.Many <strong>in</strong>dividuals with Schizophrenia have recurr<strong>in</strong>g acute psychotic attacks (consist<strong>in</strong>g ofpositive and/or disorganized symp<strong>to</strong>ms) throughout their life, which are typically separated by<strong>in</strong>terven<strong>in</strong>g periods <strong>in</strong> which they usually experience residual or negative symp<strong>to</strong>ms. It is nowrecognized that early <strong>in</strong>tervention (promptly at the time of the first psychotic break) is veryimportant <strong>in</strong> prevent<strong>in</strong>g major cognitive impairment result<strong>in</strong>g from this condition.Personality disorders (Axis II)There are a number of personality disorders identified <strong>in</strong> the DSM-IV-TR, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: Borderl<strong>in</strong>e Personality Disorder Schizotypal Personality Disorder Anti-Social Personality Disorder, and Narcissistic Personality Disorder.Onset typically occurs dur<strong>in</strong>g adolescence or <strong>in</strong> early adulthood. The disorder affects thought,emotion, <strong>in</strong>terpersonal relationships, and impulse control. Symp<strong>to</strong>ms <strong>in</strong>clude difficulty gett<strong>in</strong>galong with people and the presence of consistent behaviours that deviate markedly from societalexpectations. The prognosis depends on whether the person has an awareness and acceptance ofthe disorder and its manifestations, and is will<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> engage <strong>in</strong> treatment.Mental retardation (Axis II)The DSM-IV-TR def<strong>in</strong>es Mental Retardation as significantly sub-average <strong>in</strong>tellectualfunction<strong>in</strong>g (an IQ of 70 or below), with onset before the age of 18 years, and concurrent deficitsor impairments <strong>in</strong> adaptive function<strong>in</strong>g.Suicidal ideationSuicidal ideation is def<strong>in</strong>ed as hav<strong>in</strong>g thoughts of suicide or tak<strong>in</strong>g action <strong>to</strong> end one’s own life,irrespective of whether the thoughts <strong>in</strong>clude a plan <strong>to</strong> commit suicide. Studies <strong>in</strong>dicate that morethan 90% of all suicides are associated with psychiatric disorders.InsightFor <strong>in</strong>dividuals with psychiatric disorders, <strong>in</strong>sight is an important fac<strong>to</strong>r <strong>in</strong> their ability <strong>to</strong> adhere<strong>to</strong> treatment and respond appropriately <strong>to</strong> their condition. In general, <strong>in</strong>dividuals with sufficient<strong>in</strong>sight are those who are aware of any cognitive limitations caused by their disorder and whohave the judgment and will<strong>in</strong>gness <strong>to</strong> adapt their driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> these limitations.229


AffectEmotional control – the ability <strong>to</strong> manage frustration, agitation, impulsivity – is an importantfunctional component of safe driv<strong>in</strong>g performance. Affect <strong>in</strong>cludes: emotional <strong>in</strong>telligence impulse control / emotional control frustration threshold agitation, and impulsivity and / or mood control / management.In this Manual, affect will be considered as one of the functional abilities needed for driv<strong>in</strong>g for<strong>in</strong>dividuals with psychiatric disorders.Psychomo<strong>to</strong>rPsychomo<strong>to</strong>r functions affect the coord<strong>in</strong>ation of cognitive processes and mo<strong>to</strong>r activity. In thisManual, psychomo<strong>to</strong>r function will be considered as one of the functional abilities needed fordriv<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>in</strong>dividuals with psychiatric disorders.19.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of psychiatric disordersMood disorders - Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, DysthymicDisorder (Axis I)In Canada, approximately 8% of adults will experience major depression at some time <strong>in</strong> theirlives, with approximately 1% experienc<strong>in</strong>g Bipolar Disorder. Depression is more commonamong women, with a female <strong>to</strong> male ratio of 2 <strong>to</strong>1. Women also are 2 <strong>to</strong> 3 times more likely <strong>to</strong>develop Dysthymic Disorder. For bipolar disorder, the ratio between males and females isapproximately equal.Anxiety disorders (Axis I)Anxiety disorders affect 12% of the Canadian population, and result <strong>in</strong> mild <strong>to</strong> severeimpairment. The prevalence <strong>in</strong> the Canadian population is higher for Specific Phobia (6.2-8.0%)and Social Phobia (6.7%) compared <strong>to</strong> Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (1.8%), GeneralizedAnxiety Disorder (1.1%), and Panic Disorder (0.7%). The prevalence of Posttraumatic StressDisorder <strong>in</strong> the United States is estimated <strong>to</strong> be 8 <strong>to</strong> 9%.Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (Axis I)Prevalence rates of ADHD vary, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the diagnostic criteria used, the sett<strong>in</strong>g (e.g.general population vs. cl<strong>in</strong>ic sample), and the reporter (e.g. parent, teacher, self). Estimatessuggest that ADHD affects 3% <strong>to</strong> 10% of school age children and is 2 <strong>to</strong> 3 times more common<strong>in</strong> boys. It is estimated that 33% <strong>to</strong> 67% of those with ADHD cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> manifest symp<strong>to</strong>ms<strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> adulthood, and that 5% <strong>to</strong> 7% of the adult population has ADHD.230


Schizophrenia (Axis I)Schizophrenia affects 1% of the population, with onset typically <strong>in</strong> early adulthood (late teens <strong>to</strong>mid-30s). Males and females are affected equally.Personality disorders (Axis II)In the United States, the prevalence of personality disorders is estimated <strong>to</strong> be between 6 and 9%.Suicidal ideationIn the general population of Canada, the estimated prevalence of suicidal ideation is from 5 <strong>to</strong>18%. The <strong>in</strong>cidence of suicide attempts <strong>in</strong> the general population is from 1 <strong>to</strong> 5%.19.3 Psychiatric disorders and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesDespite the prevalence of psychiatric disorders <strong>in</strong> the general population, there have been few<strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the relationship between these disorders and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes.Surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, the majority of research was done, on average, more than 30 years ago.There are a number of methodological issues that impact the ability <strong>to</strong> draw conclusions from theexist<strong>in</strong>g research, <strong>in</strong> particular, the impact of improved treatment of psychiatric disorders andchanges <strong>in</strong> the complexity of the driv<strong>in</strong>g environment on the results of older studies.Nonetheless, the consistency of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs supports a general conclusion that drivers withpsychiatric conditions are at <strong>in</strong>creased risk of adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes.Mood disorders - Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, DysthymicDisorderA few studies have identified depression as one of a number of fac<strong>to</strong>rs that may <strong>in</strong>fluence driv<strong>in</strong>gperformance. However, the results of these studies are equivocal, and methodologicallimitations significantly limit any conclusions that may be drawn.Pharmacological treatment of mood disorders is an important consideration. When treatment iseffective, the alertness, cognitive ability and judgment of a person with a mood disorder may beimproved. At the same time, the significant side effects of anti-depressant medications may<strong>in</strong>clude impairments <strong>in</strong> psychomo<strong>to</strong>r function<strong>in</strong>g, sedation, and impairments <strong>in</strong> cognitivefunction<strong>in</strong>g. The impact of the side effects of drug treatment on driv<strong>in</strong>g is considered <strong>in</strong> Chapter29, Psychotropic Drugs.Anxiety disordersThere are no studies that have <strong>in</strong>vestigated the relationship between anxiety disorders anddriv<strong>in</strong>g. Pharmacological treatment with sedatives or hypnotics may <strong>in</strong>clude side effects thatimpair functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive. See Chapter 29, Psychotropic Drugs, for more <strong>in</strong>formation.231


Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (Axis I)There is a small body of research that suggests that drivers with ADHD are at a higher risk forcrashes, have higher rates of traffic citations, licence revocations or suspensions, and are morelikely <strong>to</strong> drive without a licence.There is some <strong>in</strong>dication that pharmacological treatment of ADHD with stimulants may have apositive effect on driv<strong>in</strong>g performance. However, research <strong>in</strong> this area has primarily relied ondriv<strong>in</strong>g simula<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> measure outcomes. A few studies have <strong>in</strong>vestigated the relationshipbetween pharmacological treatment of ADHD and on-road performance. However,methodological limitations, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g small sample size (< 20 <strong>in</strong> all cases), limit the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs.The effects of pharmacological treatment of ADHD are discussed further <strong>in</strong> Chapter 29,Psychotropic Drugs.SchizophreniaThe results of the few studies on the relationship between Schizophrenia and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>goutcomes are equivocal. Given the functional impairments often associated with this disorder,the results are surpris<strong>in</strong>g. An important fac<strong>to</strong>r which may contribute <strong>to</strong> the equivocal results isdriver licens<strong>in</strong>g rates. A recent study found that only 52% of <strong>in</strong>dividuals with Schizophreniawere licensed <strong>to</strong> drive compared <strong>to</strong> 96% <strong>in</strong> the control group. Failure <strong>to</strong> control for the reduceddriv<strong>in</strong>g exposure of <strong>in</strong>dividuals with Schizophrenia is an important consideration <strong>in</strong> that crashrates are likely an underestimation of impairments <strong>in</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g performance <strong>in</strong> this population.Personality disordersTwo studies, both more than 30 years old, considered the relationship between personalitydisorders and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes. Both studies found an <strong>in</strong>creased crash risk for<strong>in</strong>dividuals with personality disorders.Suicidal ideationStudies on the <strong>in</strong>cidence of traffic suicides <strong>in</strong>dicate that suicide attempts play a significant role <strong>in</strong>mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle crashes. Moreover, it is likely that the reported <strong>in</strong>cidence rates of traffic suicidesare an underestimation, due <strong>to</strong> the methodological difficulties <strong>in</strong> classify<strong>in</strong>g a traffic death assuicide.Research <strong>in</strong>dicates the follow<strong>in</strong>g risk fac<strong>to</strong>rs for traffic suicides: males are significantly more at risk (90 <strong>to</strong> 95%) than females whites are more at risk than other racial groups those who are “depressed” or “mentally disturbed” are more at risk than those who are not,and those with a his<strong>to</strong>ry of attempted suicide or a family his<strong>to</strong>ry of suicide are more at risk thanthose without such his<strong>to</strong>ry.232


19.4 Effect of psychiatric disorders on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drivePsychiatric disorders can result <strong>in</strong> either a persistent or episodic impairment of the functionsnecessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g.The role of <strong>in</strong>sightAn <strong>in</strong>dividual’s level of <strong>in</strong>sight is a critical consideration when assess<strong>in</strong>g the risk of an episodicimpairment of functional ability due <strong>to</strong> a psychiatric disorder.Individuals with good <strong>in</strong>sight are more likely <strong>to</strong> be diligent about their treatment regime and <strong>to</strong>seek medical attention and avoid driv<strong>in</strong>g when experienc<strong>in</strong>g acute episodes. Poor <strong>in</strong>sight may beevidenced by non-compliance with treatment, trivializ<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s role <strong>in</strong> a crash orrepeated <strong>in</strong>voluntary admissions <strong>to</strong> hospital, often as a result of discont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g prescribedmedication. 9Mood disorders - Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Dysthymia (Axis I)Cognitive abilities that may be affected by mood disorders <strong>in</strong>clude: attention and concentration memory <strong>in</strong>formation process<strong>in</strong>g reaction time, and psychomo<strong>to</strong>r function<strong>in</strong>g.Anxiety disorders (Axis I)The research on the effects of anxiety disorders on functional ability is limited. F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs fromstudies exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the effects of anxiety disorders on cognitive function<strong>in</strong>g are equivocal.Neurobiological studies suggest that medial and temporal lobe structures are affected <strong>in</strong> anxietydisorders. These are structures that are responsible for memory and higher order executivefunction<strong>in</strong>g. From a cl<strong>in</strong>ical perspective, the potential for dim<strong>in</strong>ished attention, or perseverat<strong>in</strong>gon errors (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g “freez<strong>in</strong>g”) <strong>in</strong> the face of unexpected risks on the road may be of concern fordriv<strong>in</strong>g.9 Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Medical <strong>Fitness</strong> <strong>to</strong> Operate Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles – CMA <strong>Drive</strong>r’s <strong>Guide</strong>, 7 th edition, 2006, pg. 33233


Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (Axis I)The pattern of deficits <strong>in</strong> adults with ADHD is similar <strong>to</strong> that <strong>in</strong> children and adolescents. Oneof the primary cognitive functions that may be affected is the ability <strong>to</strong> susta<strong>in</strong> attention,particularly when perform<strong>in</strong>g demand<strong>in</strong>g cognitive tasks. In addition <strong>to</strong> attentional impairments,<strong>in</strong>dividuals with ADHD often experience other cognitive deficits such as difficulties with: plann<strong>in</strong>g and forethought flexibility problem solv<strong>in</strong>g work<strong>in</strong>g memory, and response <strong>in</strong>hibition.Symp<strong>to</strong>ms of ADHD referenced <strong>in</strong> the DSM-IV-TR that may be relevant <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clude:Inattention often fails <strong>to</strong> give close attention <strong>to</strong> details or makes careless mistakes <strong>in</strong> school work, work,or other activities often has difficulty susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g attention <strong>in</strong> tasks or play activities often is easily distracted by extraneous stimuli.Hyperactivity-impulsivity often is “on the go” or acts as if “driven by a mo<strong>to</strong>r” often has difficulty await<strong>in</strong>g his or her turn.Schizophrenia (Axis I)Neuropsychological deficits associated with Schizophrenia may impact driv<strong>in</strong>g. The degree offunctional impairment associated with schizophrenia varies between the acute and residualphases of the disorder. Neuropsychological functions that may be impaired <strong>in</strong>clude: attention executive function spatial abilities memory, and mo<strong>to</strong>r and tactile dexterity.Personality disorders (Axis II)The characteristics of personality disorders most likely <strong>to</strong> affect driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clude: affectivity (e.g. aggression, frustration, anger) <strong>in</strong>terpersonal function<strong>in</strong>g (e.g. failure <strong>to</strong> conform <strong>to</strong> social norms, reckless disregard for thesafety of others), and poor impulse control.234


Suicidal ideationSuicidal ideation is an important consideration regard<strong>in</strong>g drivers with psychiatric disordersbecause of the risk of traffic suicide.Pharmacological treatmentIn addition <strong>to</strong> the direct effects of psychiatric disorders on functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive, the impac<strong>to</strong>f pharmacological treatment is an important consideration when assess<strong>in</strong>g drivers. The effectsof drug treatment are considered <strong>in</strong> Chapter 29, Psychotropic Drugs.ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessmentapproachPrimaryfunctionalabilityaffectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsPersistentImpairment:FunctionalassessmentCognitivePsychomo<strong>to</strong>r<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s reportIC<strong>BC</strong> road testMood disordersAnxiety disordersADHDSchizophreniaCognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>olssuch as; MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD, Trails Aor B<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessmentFunctional assessment byan occupational therapis<strong>to</strong>r driver rehabilitationspecialistEpisodicimpairment:Medical assessment– likelihood ofimpairmentCognitivePsychomo<strong>to</strong>r<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s reportPersonality disordersPersistentImpairment:FunctionalassessmentAffective<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s reportEpisodicimpairment:Affective<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation Report235


ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessmentapproachPrimaryfunctionalabilityaffectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsMedical assessment– likelihood ofimpairmentSpecialist’s report19.5 CompensationIndividuals with psychiatric disorders are not able <strong>to</strong> compensate for their impairments.236


GUIDELINES19.6 Private and commercial drivers with a psychiatric disorder or psychoticepisodeApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have: a psychiatric disorder, or a psychotic episode.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s mental health team,or an assessment from a psychologist or psychiatrist.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that the <strong>in</strong>dividual may havepersistent functional impairment as a result of the condition or itstreatment, OSMV will request functional assessment(s) as appropriatefor the type of impairment(s) and class of licence held.Individuals may drive if: their condition is stable they have been assessed as hav<strong>in</strong>g sufficient <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>pdriv<strong>in</strong>g if their condition becomes acute they are compliant with any prescribed psychotropic medicationregime or other recommended treatment, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g regularfollow-up where required for commercial drivers who have had a psychotic episode, aspecialist is supportive of their return <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g, and their functional abilities necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g are not impairedOSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: their condition is stable and controlled their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician does not <strong>in</strong>dicate any concerns with<strong>in</strong>sight they are compliant with any prescribed psychotropic medicationregime or other recommended treatment, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g regularfollow-up where required for commercial drivers who have had a psychotic episode, aspecialist, or their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician if the physician has beentreat<strong>in</strong>g the driver for more than two years, is supportive of theirreturn <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g, and where the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates possible persistent237


ConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationalefunctional impairment result<strong>in</strong>g from the condition or itstreatment, a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have thefunctional ability required for their class of licence held.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must s<strong>to</strong>p driv<strong>in</strong>g and report <strong>to</strong> OSMV if you are hospitalizeddue <strong>to</strong> a psychotic episode, and you must rema<strong>in</strong> under regular medical supervision and followyour physician’s advice regard<strong>in</strong>g treatment.No restrictions are required.For <strong>in</strong>dividuals who have had a psychotic episode, OSMV will reassessannually until the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates there have beenno further psychotic episodes.Otherwise, OSMV will determ<strong>in</strong>e the appropriate re-assessment<strong>in</strong>terval for <strong>in</strong>dividuals with a psychiatric disorder on an <strong>in</strong>dividualbasis.Given the nature of psychiatric disorders, assessment of fitness mustrely primarily on the cl<strong>in</strong>ical judgment of health care professionals<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> treatment. Where the disorder results <strong>in</strong> a persistentimpairment, the impact of that impairment should be functionallyassessed.238


Chapter 20: Cerebrovascular DiseaseBACKGROUND20.1 About cerebrovascular diseaseCerebrovascular disease is disease <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g the blood vessels supply<strong>in</strong>g the bra<strong>in</strong>.Transient ischemic attack (TIA)A transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a brief episode of neurological dysfunction caused by atemporary state of reduced blood flow <strong>to</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong>. The symp<strong>to</strong>ms of a TIA are similar <strong>to</strong> aCVA (described below) but are temporary, typically last<strong>in</strong>g less than one hour and no more than24 hours. The most common cause of a TIA is a blood clot. A TIA is considered <strong>to</strong> be awarn<strong>in</strong>g sign that a CVA may be imm<strong>in</strong>ent. The risk of hav<strong>in</strong>g a CVA is 10% <strong>in</strong> the first 90days follow<strong>in</strong>g a TIA, with a cumulative 3 year risk of 25%.Cerebrovascular accident (CVA)A cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or stroke is def<strong>in</strong>ed as rapidly develop<strong>in</strong>g cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs offocal or global disturbance of cerebral function, with symp<strong>to</strong>ms last<strong>in</strong>g 24 hours or longer, orlead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> death, with no apparent cause other than of vascular orig<strong>in</strong>. A CVA can be classifiedas either ischemic or hemorrhagic. Ischemic CVA refers <strong>to</strong> a CVA caused by thrombosis orembolism, and accounts for 85% of all CVAs. Hemorrhagic CVAs are caused by an<strong>in</strong>tracerebral hemorrhage (bleed<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong>) or subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleed<strong>in</strong>gbetween the <strong>in</strong>ner and outer layers of the tissue cover<strong>in</strong>g the bra<strong>in</strong>).The symp<strong>to</strong>ms of a CVA vary depend<strong>in</strong>g on what part of the bra<strong>in</strong> is affected. The mostcommon symp<strong>to</strong>m is weakness or paralysis of one side of the body with partial or complete lossof voluntary movement or sensation <strong>in</strong> a leg or arm. There can be speech problems and weakface muscles. Numbness or t<strong>in</strong>gl<strong>in</strong>g is very common. A CVA can affect: balance vision swallow<strong>in</strong>g breath<strong>in</strong>g, and level of consciousness.Visual or spatial neglect is a common consequence of a CVA. With neglect, damage <strong>to</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong>causes an <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>to</strong> ignore one side of their visual field or their body, even if they reta<strong>in</strong>sensation and function. Neglect is usually a result of a stroke affect<strong>in</strong>g the right hemisphere ofthe bra<strong>in</strong>, therefore caus<strong>in</strong>g neglect of the left side. Visual neglect occurs <strong>in</strong> 33 <strong>to</strong> 85% of allstrokes affect<strong>in</strong>g the right hemisphere.239


The prognosis for recovery follow<strong>in</strong>g a CVA is related <strong>to</strong> the severity of the CVA and how muchof the bra<strong>in</strong> has been damaged. Most functional recovery occurs with<strong>in</strong> the first two monthsfollow<strong>in</strong>g a CVA.The risk of a subsequent CVA is approximately 4% per year, with a 10 year cumulative risk of43%. In the first six months follow<strong>in</strong>g a CVA, the risk of a subsequent CVA is approximately9%.Cerebral aneurysmA cerebral aneurysm is the localized dilation or balloon<strong>in</strong>g of a cerebral artery or ve<strong>in</strong> result<strong>in</strong>gfrom weakness <strong>in</strong> the wall of the affected vessel. Most cerebral aneurysms have no associatedsymp<strong>to</strong>ms until they become large or rupture. The majority (50 <strong>to</strong> 80%) rema<strong>in</strong> small and do notrupture.Symp<strong>to</strong>ms associated with larger aneurysms <strong>in</strong>clude: sudden severe headache nausea and vomit<strong>in</strong>g visual impairment, and loss of consciousness.The risk of rupture <strong>in</strong>creases with the size of the aneurysm. A rupture results <strong>in</strong> subarachnoid or<strong>in</strong>tracerebral hemorrhage, lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> alterations <strong>in</strong> consciousness <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: syncope seizures visual impairment, and respira<strong>to</strong>ry or cardiovascular <strong>in</strong>stability.Treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms is controversial. Treatment options <strong>in</strong>cludeobservation and surgical procedures <strong>to</strong> prevent blood from flow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the aneurysm. Risks ofsurgery <strong>in</strong>clude possible damage <strong>to</strong> other blood vessels, potential for aneurysm recurrence andrebleed<strong>in</strong>g, and post-operative CVA. Successful surgery reduces the risk of rupture.20.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of cerebrovascular diseaseTransient ischemic attackThe results of a survey published <strong>in</strong> 2000 by the National Stroke Association found that half amillion adults (18 years of age and older) <strong>in</strong> Canada had been diagnosed with a TIA. Apopulation-based study <strong>in</strong> Alberta found the age-adjusted <strong>in</strong>cidence of TIA <strong>to</strong> be between .04%and .07% (44 and 68 per 100,000) annually.The risk fac<strong>to</strong>rs for a TIA are similar <strong>to</strong> those for CVA (see below).240


Cerebrovascular accidentCVAs are the 4th lead<strong>in</strong>g cause of death <strong>in</strong> Canada and account for 7% of all deaths <strong>in</strong> Canada.Of the 40,000 <strong>to</strong> 50,000 Canadians who have a CVA each year, 14,000 will die.The risk fac<strong>to</strong>rs for CVA <strong>in</strong>clude: high blood pressure cigarette smok<strong>in</strong>g heart disease carotid artery disease diabetes, and heavy use of alcohol.The risk for males is three times greater than for females. Risk also <strong>in</strong>creases with age, withthose <strong>in</strong> their 70’s and 80’s at the greatest risk.Cerebral aneurysmPrevalence rates for cerebral aneurysm are unclear because they are often asymp<strong>to</strong>matic.Au<strong>to</strong>psy studies <strong>in</strong>dicate a prevalence rate <strong>in</strong> the adult population between 1 and 5%, with 5%be<strong>in</strong>g a widely cited figure.Under age 40, cerebral aneurysms affect equal numbers of males and females, but are rarely seen<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants and children. Over age 40, more women than men are affected. The peak age forcl<strong>in</strong>ical manifestation of cerebral aneurysm is between 55 and 60.20.3 Cerebrovascular disease and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesTransient ischemic attackThere has been little research on the relationship between TIA and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes.Cerebrovascular accidentThere has been little research on episodic impairment (sudden <strong>in</strong>capacitation) of driv<strong>in</strong>g abilitydue <strong>to</strong> a CVA.In studies that considered the effects of persistent impairments from CVA as measured by fitness<strong>to</strong> drive assessments, 50% or more of the subjects who had a CVA were assessed as unfit <strong>to</strong>drive. Surveys of drivers who had a CVA <strong>in</strong>dicate that more than half did not resume driv<strong>in</strong>gafter their CVA.Cerebral aneurysmNo studies were found that considered the relationship between cerebral aneurysm and adversedriv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes.241


20.4 Effect of cerebrovascular disease on functional ability <strong>to</strong> driveTransient ischemic attackThe primary concern for licens<strong>in</strong>g is the potential for a subsequent CVA. The greatest risk iswith<strong>in</strong> the 3 months follow<strong>in</strong>g the TIA.Cerebrovascular accidentThe primary concern for licens<strong>in</strong>g is the potential for a persistent impairment of functionalability follow<strong>in</strong>g a CVA. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on what part of the bra<strong>in</strong> is affected, cognitive, mo<strong>to</strong>r orsensory functions may be impaired.Cerebral aneurysmThe primary concern for licens<strong>in</strong>g is the risk of an episodic impairment caused by rupture of theaneurysm. Generally, this risk is not considered significant for licens<strong>in</strong>g purposes unless theaneurysm is symp<strong>to</strong>matic or has been identified as requir<strong>in</strong>g surgical <strong>in</strong>terventionA large or leak<strong>in</strong>g cerebral aneurysm could result <strong>in</strong> a persistent impairment of cognitive, mo<strong>to</strong>ror sensory functions depend<strong>in</strong>g on its size and location.ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessmentapproachPrimaryfunctionalabilityaffectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsTransient ischemic attack(TIA)Episodicimpairment (riskfor stroke):Medical assessment– likelihood ofimpairmentVariable –suddencognitive,mo<strong>to</strong>r orsensoryimpairment<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s report242


ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessmentapproachPrimaryfunctionalabilityaffectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsCerebrovascular accident(CVA)Persistentimpairment:FunctionalassessmentVariable –cognitive,mo<strong>to</strong>r orsensory<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s reportCognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>olssuch as; MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD, Trails A orBIC<strong>BC</strong> road test<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessmentFunctional assessment byan occupational therapist ordriver rehabilitationspecialistCerebral aneurysmEpisodicimpairment (risk ofrupture): Medicalassessment –likelihood ofimpairmentAll – suddenimpairment<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s reportPersistentimpairment (wheresymp<strong>to</strong>matic):FunctionalassessmentVariable –cognitive,mo<strong>to</strong>r orsensory<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s reportCognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>olssuch as; MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD, Trails A orBIC<strong>BC</strong> road test<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessmentFunctional assessment byan occupational therapist ordriver rehabilitationspecialist243


20.5 CompensationIndividuals who have experienced a persistent impairment of mo<strong>to</strong>r or sensory function may beable <strong>to</strong> compensate. An occupational therapist, driver rehabilitation specialist, driver exam<strong>in</strong>eror other medical professional may recommend specific compensa<strong>to</strong>ry vehicle modifications orrestrictions based on an <strong>in</strong>dividual functional assessment.Some examples of compensa<strong>to</strong>ry mechanisms are shown <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g table.Mo<strong>to</strong>r impairment Steer<strong>in</strong>g wheel sp<strong>in</strong>ner knob Left-foot accelera<strong>to</strong>r pedal Restriction <strong>to</strong> au<strong>to</strong>matic transmission orpower-assisted brakes Downgrade from commercial class <strong>to</strong>private class licenceSensory (vision) impairment Scann<strong>in</strong>g horizon more frequently Turn<strong>in</strong>g head 90◦ <strong>to</strong> maximize areascanned Large left and right side mirrorsLittle empirical research considers the relationship between vehicle modifications and adversedriv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes. The effectiveness of <strong>in</strong>dividual vehicle modifications may be determ<strong>in</strong>edthrough a road test.244


GUIDELINES20.6 Private and commercial drivers who have had a TIAApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have had a transient ischemic attack(TIA).OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.Individuals may drive if: it has been at least 2 weeks s<strong>in</strong>ce the TIA, and they follow any prescribed diagnostic or treatment regime.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least 2 weeks s<strong>in</strong>ce the TIA, and they follow any prescribed diagnostic or treatment regime.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must report any further TIAs <strong>to</strong> OSMV, and you must rema<strong>in</strong> under regular medical supervision and followyour physician’s advice regard<strong>in</strong>g treatment.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> one year. At that time, if the treat<strong>in</strong>gphysician <strong>in</strong>dicates that there have been no further TIAs or CVAs, nofurther re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-relatedre-assessment, is required.The primary driver fitness concern with a TIA is the risk for a CVAafter a TIA. By def<strong>in</strong>ition, there are no persistent impairmentsassociated with a TIA. The risk for CVA is greatest immediatelyafter the TIA and decreases significantly overtime. Subject matterexperts recommended a m<strong>in</strong>imum no-driv<strong>in</strong>g period of two weeks,with appropriate follow-up and treatment.245


20.7 Private and commercial drivers who have had a CVAApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have had a cerebrovascular accident(CVA).If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates significant residual loss of one ormore of the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMV will requestfunctional assessment(s) as appropriate for the type(s) of impairmentand class of licence held.Individuals who have had a CVA may not drive for a m<strong>in</strong>imum of 1month after the CVA. After 1 month, <strong>in</strong>dividuals may drive if: there is no apparent loss of cognitive, mo<strong>to</strong>r and sensory functionrequired for driv<strong>in</strong>g any underly<strong>in</strong>g cause has been addressed with appropriatetreatment, and a post CVA seizure has not occurred.Where a medical assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that there may be someresidual loss of cognitive, mo<strong>to</strong>r or sensory function that could affectdriv<strong>in</strong>g, a further functional assessment may be required.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: any underly<strong>in</strong>g cause has been addressed with appropriatetreatment a post CVA seizure has not occurred (if a post CVA seizure hasoccurred, see the guidel<strong>in</strong>es under 23.7), and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates there has been no significantresidual loss of the functions required for driv<strong>in</strong>g or, where thetreat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that there may be significant residualloss of the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, a functionalassessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have the functional ability requiredfor their class of licence held.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g condition on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must report any further CVAs <strong>to</strong> OSMV, and you must rema<strong>in</strong> under regular medical supervision and followyour physician’s advice regard<strong>in</strong>g treatment.Restrictions on the licence may be required, depend<strong>in</strong>g upon thenature of the functional impairment and the ability of the driver <strong>to</strong>compensate.246


Re-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleOSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> one year. At that time, if the treat<strong>in</strong>gphysician <strong>in</strong>dicates that there have been no further TIAs or CVAs, nofurther re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-relatedre-assessment, is required.The primary driver fitness concern with a CVA is the potential for apersistent impairment. Subject matter experts recommended am<strong>in</strong>imum no-driv<strong>in</strong>g period of one month, with appropriate follow-upand treatment.247


20.8 Private and commercial drivers who have a cerebral aneurysm thatrequires repairApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have a cerebral aneurysm that requiressurgical repair.OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.Individuals may not drive.Individuals are not fit <strong>to</strong> drive.N/AN/AN/AThe primary driver fitness concern with cerebral aneurysm is the riskof rupture. Where the risk of rupture is such that surgery isrecommended <strong>to</strong> repair the rupture, a driver is considered unfit <strong>to</strong>drive.248


20.9 Private drivers who have had surgery <strong>to</strong> repair a cerebral aneurysmApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have had surgery <strong>to</strong> repair a cerebral aneurysm.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a neurosurgeon.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates symp<strong>to</strong>ms that impair one or moreof the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMV will request functionalassessment(s) as appropriate for the type(s) of impairment and classof licence held.Individuals who have had surgery <strong>to</strong> repair a cerebral aneurysm maynot drive for at least 3 months after surgery. After 3 months theymay drive if:they have no symp<strong>to</strong>ms of the aneurysm, orif they cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> have symp<strong>to</strong>ms, the symp<strong>to</strong>ms do not impairtheir functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least 3 months s<strong>in</strong>ce the surgery, and they have no symp<strong>to</strong>ms of the aneurysm, or the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician does not <strong>in</strong>dicate that symp<strong>to</strong>ms of theaneurysm may impair the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, or where the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that symp<strong>to</strong>ms of theaneurysm may impair the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, afunctional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have the functionalability required <strong>to</strong> drive a private vehicle.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If the <strong>in</strong>dividual is not hav<strong>in</strong>g symp<strong>to</strong>ms, no re-assessment, other thanrout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment, is required.If the <strong>in</strong>dividual is hav<strong>in</strong>g symp<strong>to</strong>ms, OSMV will determ<strong>in</strong>e theappropriate re-assessment <strong>in</strong>terval on an <strong>in</strong>dividual basis, depend<strong>in</strong>gupon the nature and severity of the symp<strong>to</strong>ms.249


Policy rationaleSuccessful surgical treatment for a cerebral aneurysm significantlyreduces the risk of rupture. A wait<strong>in</strong>g period of 3 months aftersurgery is imposed <strong>to</strong> allow for an assessment of the effectiveness ofthe surgery or any complications of surgery.The impact of any symp<strong>to</strong>ms caused by the aneurysm or bycomplications from surgery should be assessed.250


20.10 Commercial drivers who have had surgery <strong>to</strong> repair a cerebral aneurysmApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers who have had surgery <strong>to</strong> repair a cerebralaneurysm.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a neurosurgeon.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates symp<strong>to</strong>ms that impair one or moreof the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMV will request functionalassessment(s) as appropriate for the type(s) of impairment and classof licence held.Individuals who have had surgery <strong>to</strong> repair a cerebral aneurysm maynot drive for at least 6 months after surgery. After 6 months theymay drive if:they have no symp<strong>to</strong>ms of the aneurysm, orif they cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> have symp<strong>to</strong>ms, the symp<strong>to</strong>ms do not impairtheir functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least 6 months s<strong>in</strong>ce the surgery, and they have no symp<strong>to</strong>ms of the aneurysm, or the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician does not <strong>in</strong>dicate that symp<strong>to</strong>ms of theaneurysm may impair the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, or where the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that symp<strong>to</strong>ms of theaneurysm may impair the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, afunctional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have the functionalability required for their class of licence held.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If the <strong>in</strong>dividual is not hav<strong>in</strong>g symp<strong>to</strong>ms, no re-assessment, other thanrout<strong>in</strong>e commercial re-assessment, is required.If the <strong>in</strong>dividual is hav<strong>in</strong>g symp<strong>to</strong>ms, OSMV will determ<strong>in</strong>e theappropriate re-assessment <strong>in</strong>terval on an <strong>in</strong>dividual basis, depend<strong>in</strong>gupon the nature and severity of the symp<strong>to</strong>ms.The wait<strong>in</strong>g period for commercial drivers is longer than that forprivate drivers <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> provide more certa<strong>in</strong>ty about the success ofsurgery prior <strong>to</strong> a return <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g.251


Chapter 21:Vision ImpairmentBACKGROUND21.1 About vision impairmentVision impairment is def<strong>in</strong>ed as a functional limitation of the visual system and can bemanifested as reduced visual acuity, reduced contrast sensitivity, visual field loss, loss of depthperception, diplopia (double-vision), visual perceptual difficulties or any comb<strong>in</strong>ation of these.This chapter focuses on more common vision impairments and medical conditions that can causevision impairments.Visual acuityVisual acuity is the ability of the eye <strong>to</strong> perceive details. It can be described as either static ordynamic. Static visual acuity, the common measure of visual acuity, is def<strong>in</strong>ed as the smallestdetail that can be dist<strong>in</strong>guished <strong>in</strong> a stationary, high contrast target (e.g. an eye chart with blackletters on a white background). When tested, it is reported as the ratio between the test subject’svisual acuity and standard “normal” visual acuity. Normal visual acuity is described as 20/20 or6/6 <strong>in</strong> metric. A person with 20/40 vision (6/12 metric) needs <strong>to</strong> be 20 feet (6 metres) away <strong>to</strong>dist<strong>in</strong>guish detail that a person with normal vision can dist<strong>in</strong>guish at 40 feet (12 metres). Thestandard Snellen chart for measur<strong>in</strong>g visual acuity and a table of standard rat<strong>in</strong>gs is <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong>21.16.Dynamic visual acuity is the ability <strong>to</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>guish detail when there is relative motion betweenthe object and the observer. Given the nature of driv<strong>in</strong>g, dynamic visual acuity would seem <strong>to</strong> bemore relevant <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g fitness than static visual acuity. However, barriers <strong>to</strong> the use ofdynamic visual acuity for fitness <strong>to</strong> drive decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clude the absence of a practicablemethod of test<strong>in</strong>g dynamic visual acuity, limited research on its relevancy for driv<strong>in</strong>g, and thelack of established levels of dynamic visual acuity required for driv<strong>in</strong>g safely.Visual fieldThe visual field is the extent of the area that a person can see with their eyes held <strong>in</strong> a fixedposition, usually measured <strong>in</strong> degrees. The normal b<strong>in</strong>ocular (us<strong>in</strong>g both eyes) visual field is 135degrees vertically and 180 degrees horizontally from the fixed po<strong>in</strong>t.The visual field can be divided <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> central and peripheral portions. Central vision refers <strong>to</strong>vision with<strong>in</strong> 30 degrees of the po<strong>in</strong>t of fixation or gaze. The macula, a small area <strong>in</strong> the centreof the ret<strong>in</strong>a, is responsible for f<strong>in</strong>e, sharp, straight-ahead central vision. Peripheral vision allowsfor the detection of objects and movement outside the scope of central vision.252


Visual field impairment refers <strong>to</strong> a loss of part of the normal visual field. The term “sco<strong>to</strong>ma”refers <strong>to</strong> any area where the area of lost visual field is surrounded by normal vision. See 21.17for more <strong>in</strong>formation on types of visual field impairments.Common vision impairmentsBl<strong>in</strong>dness/low visionTotal bl<strong>in</strong>dness is the complete lack of vision and is often described as no light perception. Aperson may be considered ‘bl<strong>in</strong>d’ even though they have some vision. There is no universallyaccepted level of visual acuity <strong>to</strong> def<strong>in</strong>e bl<strong>in</strong>dness. In North America and most of Europe aperson is considered <strong>to</strong> be legally bl<strong>in</strong>d if their visual acuity is 20/200 (6/60) or less <strong>in</strong> the bettereye with the best correction possible, or if their visual field is less than 20 degrees <strong>in</strong> diameter.The World Health Organization (WHO) def<strong>in</strong>es “low vision” as visual acuity between 20/60(6/18) and 20/400 (6/120) or a visual field between 10 and 20 degrees <strong>in</strong> diameter. The WHOdef<strong>in</strong>ition of “bl<strong>in</strong>dness” is visual acuity less than 20/400 (3/60) or a visual field less than 10degrees.Myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism (refractive errors)Myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism are conditions associated with reduced visual acuity. Theyare known as refractive errors and are the result of errors <strong>in</strong> the focus<strong>in</strong>g of light by the eye.Myopia (nearsightedness) is a condition <strong>in</strong> which near objects are seen clearly but distant objectsdo not come <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> proper focus. Individuals with normal daytime vision may experience “nightmyopia”. Night myopia is believed <strong>to</strong> be caused by pupils dilat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> let more light <strong>in</strong>, whichadds aberrations that result <strong>in</strong> nearsightedness. It is more common <strong>in</strong> younger <strong>in</strong>dividuals anpeople who are myopic.Hyperopia (farsightedness) is a condition <strong>in</strong> which distant objects are seen clearly but closeobjects do not come <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> focus. Age-related farsightedness is called presbyopia. It is not adisease, but occurs as a natural part of the ag<strong>in</strong>g process of the eye and usually becomesnoticeable as an <strong>in</strong>dividual enters their early <strong>to</strong> mid-40’s.Astigmatism is a visual condition that results <strong>in</strong> blurred vision. It commonly occurs with otherconditions such as myopia and hyperopia.Monocular vision/Loss of stereoscopic depth perceptionMonocular vision refers <strong>to</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g vision <strong>in</strong> one eye only and is associated with the loss ofstereoscopic vision. Stereoscopic vision, <strong>in</strong> which the bra<strong>in</strong> processes <strong>in</strong>formation from each eye<strong>to</strong> create a s<strong>in</strong>gle visual image, is <strong>in</strong>tegral <strong>to</strong> depth perception <strong>in</strong> those with b<strong>in</strong>ocular vision.253


Impaired colour visionIndividuals with impaired colour vision (colour bl<strong>in</strong>dness) lack a perceptual sensitivity <strong>to</strong> someor all colours. These impairments are usually congenital and <strong>in</strong> general, <strong>in</strong>dividuals learn <strong>to</strong>compensate for the <strong>in</strong>ability <strong>to</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>guish colours when driv<strong>in</strong>g. Therefore, colour visionimpairments are not rout<strong>in</strong>ely considered by OSMV as a matter of driver fitness.Impaired contrast sensitivityVisual contrast sensitivity refers <strong>to</strong> the ability <strong>to</strong> perceive differences between an object and itsbackground. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the cause, a loss of contrast sensitivity may or may not be associatedwith a correspond<strong>in</strong>g loss of visual acuity. Decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> contrast sensitivity are associated withnormal ag<strong>in</strong>g, and can also result from conditions such as cataracts, age-related maculardegeneration, glaucoma, and diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathy.Dark adaptation and glare recoveryDark adaptation refers <strong>to</strong> the process <strong>in</strong> which the visual system adjusts <strong>to</strong> a change from a welllitenvironment <strong>to</strong> a dark environment. Glare recovery refers <strong>to</strong> the process <strong>in</strong> which the eyesrecover visual sensitivity follow<strong>in</strong>g exposure <strong>to</strong> a source of glare, such as oncom<strong>in</strong>g headlightswhen driv<strong>in</strong>g at night.Prolonged dark adaptation is associated with normal ag<strong>in</strong>g and results <strong>in</strong> decreased visual acuityat night. It may also be the result of a medical condition, and where severe, may be referred <strong>to</strong> as‘night bl<strong>in</strong>dness’. Night bl<strong>in</strong>dness may be caused by a number of medical conditions <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gret<strong>in</strong>itis pigmen<strong>to</strong>sa, vitam<strong>in</strong> A deficiency, diabetes, cataracts or macular degeneration.As with dark adaptation, <strong>in</strong>dividuals require a longer time <strong>to</strong> recover from glare as they age. Inaddition, medical conditions associated with prolonged glare recovery <strong>in</strong>clude cataracts andcorneal edema. Individuals may also experience prolonged glare recovery follow<strong>in</strong>g laserassisted <strong>in</strong> situ kera<strong>to</strong>mileusis (LASIK) or panret<strong>in</strong>al laser pho<strong>to</strong>coagulation (PRP) surgery.A number of illnesses can affect glare recovery time, with prolonged recovery times reported <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals with diabetes, vascular disease, and hypertension. Ret<strong>in</strong>al conditions withdemonstrated relationships <strong>to</strong> prolonged glare recovery <strong>in</strong>clude age-related maculopathy, ‘cured’ret<strong>in</strong>al detachment, and central serous ret<strong>in</strong>opathy.Hemianopia and quadrantanopiaHemianopia, vision loss <strong>in</strong> one half of the visual field, or quadrantanopia, vision loss <strong>in</strong> onequarter of the visual field, can occur as a result of stroke, trauma, or a tumour. They are notusually caused by a problem with the eye itself. Examples of hemianopia and quadrantanopiaare provided below. The shaded areas represent vision field loss.254


Right homonymous hemianopiaB<strong>in</strong>asal hemianopiaLeft superior homonymous quadrantanopiaBitemporal hemianopiaAn important consideration related <strong>to</strong> hemianopia is the potential for anosognosia. Anosognosiais a condition <strong>in</strong> which a person with an impairment caused by a bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>jury is unaware of theimpairment. Research <strong>in</strong>dicates that hemianopic anosognosia is relatively frequent, occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>approximately two-thirds of those with hemianopia. Unawareness of visual field deficits has anobvious negative impact on safe driv<strong>in</strong>g performance.DiplopiaDiplopia (double vision) is the simultaneous perception of two images of a s<strong>in</strong>gle object. Theseimages may be displaced horizontally, vertically, or diagonally <strong>in</strong> relation <strong>to</strong> each other.Diplopia can be b<strong>in</strong>ocular or monocular. B<strong>in</strong>ocular diplopia is present only when both eyes areopen, with the double vision disappear<strong>in</strong>g if either eye is closed or covered. Monocular diplopiais also present with both eyes open, but unlike b<strong>in</strong>ocular diplopia, the diplopia persists when theproblematic eye is open and the other eye is closed or covered.B<strong>in</strong>ocular diplopia, or true diplopia, is an <strong>in</strong>ability of the visual system <strong>to</strong> properly fuse theimages viewed by each eye <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle image. It may be caused by the physical misalignmen<strong>to</strong>f the eyes (strabismus) or diseases such as Park<strong>in</strong>son’s disease or multiple sclerosis. Two of themost common causes of b<strong>in</strong>ocular diplopia <strong>in</strong> people over 50 are thyroid conditions such asGrave’s disease, and cranial nerve damage.Monocular diplopia is not caused by misalignment, but rather by problems <strong>in</strong> the eye itself.Astigmatism, dry eye, corneal dis<strong>to</strong>rtion or scarr<strong>in</strong>g, vitreous abnormalities, cataracts, and otherconditions can cause monocular diplopia.255


NystagmusNystagmus is an <strong>in</strong>voluntary, rapid, rhythmic movement of the eyeball. The movements may behorizontal, vertical, rotary, or mixed. Nystagmus which occurs before 6 months of age is calledcongenital or early onset, whereas that occurr<strong>in</strong>g after 6 months is labelled acquired nystagmus.Early onset nystagmus may be <strong>in</strong>herited, or the result of eye or visual pathway defects. In manycases, the cause is unknown. Causes of acquired nystagmus are many and it may be a symp<strong>to</strong>mof another condition such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, or even a blow <strong>to</strong> the head.Many <strong>in</strong>dividuals with nystagmus have significant impairments <strong>in</strong> their vision, with some hav<strong>in</strong>glow vision or legal bl<strong>in</strong>dness.Medical conditions caus<strong>in</strong>g vision impairmentCataractsA cataract is an opacification or cloud<strong>in</strong>g of the crystall<strong>in</strong>e lens of the eye, which blocks lightfrom reach<strong>in</strong>g the ret<strong>in</strong>a. Cataracts may be due <strong>to</strong> a variety of causes. Some are congenital, butfew occur dur<strong>in</strong>g the early years of life. The majority of cataracts are the result of the ag<strong>in</strong>gprocess. The presence of a cataract can <strong>in</strong>terfere with visual function<strong>in</strong>g by decreas<strong>in</strong>g acuity,contrast sensitivity, and visual field.Diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathyDiabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathy is the most common eye disease <strong>in</strong> those with diabetes and results <strong>in</strong>significant impairments <strong>in</strong> vision (blurred vision, vision loss) and is a lead<strong>in</strong>g cause of bl<strong>in</strong>dness<strong>in</strong> adults. It is caused by changes <strong>in</strong> the blood vessels of the ret<strong>in</strong>a (microvascular ret<strong>in</strong>alchanges) as a result of the disease.There are two types of diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathy: background (non-proliferative) and proliferative.Background ret<strong>in</strong>opathy reflects early changes <strong>in</strong> the ret<strong>in</strong>a and often is asymp<strong>to</strong>matic.However, it may result <strong>in</strong> decreased visual acuity. Background diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathy can progress<strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> a more advanced or proliferative stage.Proliferative ret<strong>in</strong>opathy is the result of ret<strong>in</strong>al hypoxia (lack of oxygen <strong>to</strong> the ret<strong>in</strong>a) and carriesa much graver prognosis. The lack of oxygen <strong>to</strong> the ret<strong>in</strong>a results <strong>in</strong> a proliferation of newvessels <strong>in</strong> the ret<strong>in</strong>a or on the optic disc (neovascularization). Without treatment, the new vesselscan leak blood <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the centre of the eye, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> blurred vision. Fluid (exudate) also canleak <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the centre of the macula (that part of the eye where sharp, straight-ahead vision occurs),a condition called macular edema. The leakage causes swell<strong>in</strong>g of the macula result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>blurred vision. Macular edema can occur at any stage of diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathy, but is more likely<strong>to</strong> occur as the disease progresses. Research <strong>in</strong>dicates that approximately half of those withproliferative ret<strong>in</strong>opathy also have macular edema.256


An example of the effects of diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathy on vision is shown below 10 .Normal visionVision of <strong>in</strong>dividual with diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathyGlaucomaGlaucoma is a group of diseases characterized by <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>traocular pressure. The <strong>in</strong>creasedpressure can lead <strong>to</strong> optic nerve damage, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> bl<strong>in</strong>dness. Types of glaucoma <strong>in</strong>clude adultprimary glaucoma, secondary, congenital and absolute glaucoma. Open angle glaucoma, a typeof adult primary glaucoma is the most common. It is often referred <strong>to</strong> as the ‘silent bl<strong>in</strong>der’because extensive damage may occur before the patient is aware of the disease. Early diagnosisand treatment are important for the prevention of optic nerve damage and visual field loss(primarily peripheral vision) due <strong>to</strong> glaucoma.An example of the effects of glaucoma on vision is shown below 11 .Normal visionVision of <strong>in</strong>dividual with glaucoma10 Source National Eye Institute - http://www.nei.nih.gov/resources/strategicplans/neiplan/frm_impairment.asp11 Source National Eye Institute - http://www.nei.nih.gov/resources/strategicplans/neiplan/frm_impairment.asp257


Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD)Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) is associated with the advanced stages of age-relatedmaculopathy, or disease of the macula. The macula is the central portion of the ret<strong>in</strong>a and isresponsible for central vision <strong>in</strong> the eye. Most <strong>in</strong>dividuals with maculopathy have impairments<strong>in</strong> their central vision. Those with ARMD, however, experience a progressive destruction of thepho<strong>to</strong>recep<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> the macula, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> profound central vision loss.ARMD has two forms, dry and wet. The dry form is the result of atrophy <strong>to</strong> the ret<strong>in</strong>al pigment,result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> vision loss due <strong>to</strong> the loss of pho<strong>to</strong>recep<strong>to</strong>rs (rods and cones) <strong>in</strong> the central portion ofthe eye. High doses of certa<strong>in</strong> vitam<strong>in</strong>s and m<strong>in</strong>erals have been shown <strong>to</strong> slow the progression ofthe disease and reduce associated vision loss.Wet ARMD (neovascular or exudative) is due <strong>to</strong> abnormal blood vessel growth <strong>in</strong> the eye,lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> blood and prote<strong>in</strong> leakage <strong>in</strong> the macula. The bleed<strong>in</strong>g, leak<strong>in</strong>g, and scarr<strong>in</strong>g fromthese blood vessels eventually result <strong>in</strong> damage <strong>to</strong> the pho<strong>to</strong>recep<strong>to</strong>rs, with a rapid loss of visionloss if left untreated. Treatment for wet ARMD has improved. Recent pharmaceuticaladvancements have resulted <strong>in</strong> compounds that, when <strong>in</strong>jected directly <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> the vitreous humor,can cause regression of the abnormal blood vessels, lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> an improvement <strong>in</strong> vision.An example of the effects of ARMD on vision is shown below 12 .Normal visionVision of <strong>in</strong>dividual with macular degeneration12 Source National Eye Institute - http://www.nei.nih.gov/resources/strategicplans/neiplan/frm_impairment.asp258


Ret<strong>in</strong>itis pigmen<strong>to</strong>saRet<strong>in</strong>itis pigmen<strong>to</strong>sa is the term given <strong>to</strong> a group of hereditary ret<strong>in</strong>al diseases that result <strong>in</strong> thedegeneration of rod and cone pho<strong>to</strong>recep<strong>to</strong>rs. The diseases cause progressive visual loss, end<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> bl<strong>in</strong>dness. Night bl<strong>in</strong>dness is an early symp<strong>to</strong>m of ret<strong>in</strong>itis pigmen<strong>to</strong>sa, followed by aconstriction of the peripheral visual field. Loss of central vision typically occurs late <strong>in</strong> thecourse of the illness.Typically, symp<strong>to</strong>ms are not prom<strong>in</strong>ent <strong>in</strong> childhood, but with progressive degeneration of thepho<strong>to</strong>recep<strong>to</strong>r cells, vision is gradually lost dur<strong>in</strong>g adolescence and adulthood.Medical treatments caus<strong>in</strong>g vision impairmentLaser surgery – LASIK and PRPLaser surgery may also cause vision impairments. Laser assisted <strong>in</strong> situ kera<strong>to</strong>mileusis (LASIK)is a type of refractive laser eye surgery performed by ophthalmologists. It is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly be<strong>in</strong>gused <strong>to</strong> correct myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism. Panret<strong>in</strong>al laser pho<strong>to</strong>coagulation (PRP) isthe current treatment of choice for diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathy.Possible complications of laser procedures <strong>in</strong>clude over or under correction, regression (return <strong>to</strong>the orig<strong>in</strong>al refractive state), halos and glare, double vision (ghost<strong>in</strong>g), loss of contrastsensitivity, and loss of visual acuity.21.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of vision impairmentsBl<strong>in</strong>dness/low visionBased on WHO classifications, the prevalence of low vision and bl<strong>in</strong>dness <strong>in</strong> Canada is 35.6 and3.8 per 10,000 <strong>in</strong>dividuals, respectively. Among <strong>in</strong>dividuals with some vision loss (vision worsethan 20/40), cataract and visual pathway disease were the most common causes, <strong>to</strong>getheraccount<strong>in</strong>g for 40% of visual impairment. Age-related macular degeneration and other ret<strong>in</strong>aldiseases were the next most common causes of vision loss, with diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathy andglaucoma less frequently encountered as causes of visual impairment.Myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and presbyopia (refractive errors)The prevalence of visual conditions such as astigmatism, hyperopia, myopia, and presbyopia <strong>in</strong>Canada is difficult <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e due <strong>to</strong> the absence of population based studies evaluat<strong>in</strong>g theocular health of Canadians.Night myopia is relatively common among younger <strong>in</strong>dividuals, with an estimated prevalence of38% <strong>in</strong> those 16 <strong>to</strong> 25 years of age.259


Monocular vision, impaired contrast sensitivity, impaired dark adaptation andglare recoveryThere are no data on the prevalence of monocular vision, impaired contrast sensitivity, orimpaired dark adaptation and glare.Visual field loss <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g hemianopiaResearch <strong>in</strong>dicates that the prevalence of visual field loss for those age 16 <strong>to</strong> 60 years is between3 and 3.5%, ris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> 13% for those 65 and older.DiplopiaThere are no data on the prevalence of diplopia.NystagmusAlthough the prevalence of nystagmus is not accurately known, the condition is believed <strong>to</strong>affect around 1 <strong>in</strong> 5,000 <strong>in</strong>dividuals.21.3 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of medical conditions caus<strong>in</strong>g visionimpairmentsCataractsCanadian data on the prevalence of cataracts are lack<strong>in</strong>g, but statistics from the United States<strong>in</strong>dicate that approximately 17% of Americans 40 years old and older have a cataract on at leas<strong>to</strong>ne eye. Cataracts frequently occur bilaterally (<strong>in</strong> both eyes), with the prevalence of bilateralcataracts greater among women than men. Overall prevalence of cataracts <strong>in</strong>creases with age,lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g prevalence <strong>in</strong> the future as the population ages. United States censusestimates project that the prevalence of cataracts will <strong>in</strong>crease by 50% by the year 2020.Cataracts are more common <strong>in</strong> women and affect Caucasians somewhat more frequently thanother races, particularly with advanc<strong>in</strong>g age. Risk fac<strong>to</strong>rs for age-related cataracts <strong>in</strong>cludediabetes, prolonged exposure <strong>to</strong> sunlight, use of <strong>to</strong>bacco, and use of alcohol.Diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathyIndividuals with both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes are at-risk for diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathy. At presentthere is little published <strong>in</strong>formation about the prevalence of diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathy <strong>in</strong> Canada. Astudy from the United States <strong>in</strong>dicates that, after 20 years from the onset of diabetes, over 90%of people with Type 1 diabetes and more than 60% of people with Type 2 diabetes will havediabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathy.260


GlaucomaApproximately 67 million people worldwide have glaucoma, with more than 250,000 affected <strong>in</strong>Canada. Two percent of people over the age of 40 have glaucoma and the prevalence <strong>in</strong>creases<strong>to</strong> 4% <strong>to</strong> 6% <strong>in</strong> people over 60. Those at <strong>in</strong>creased risk for develop<strong>in</strong>g glaucoma <strong>in</strong>clude Blacks,those over the age of 60, and <strong>in</strong>dividuals with a family his<strong>to</strong>ry of glaucoma.Glaucoma is one of the lead<strong>in</strong>g causes of bl<strong>in</strong>dness, account<strong>in</strong>g for between 9% and 12% of allcases of bl<strong>in</strong>dness. The rate of bl<strong>in</strong>dness from glaucoma is between 93 and 126 per 100,000population 40 years or older.Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD)In Canada <strong>to</strong>day, more than two million people over the age of 50 have some form of ARMD,with the numbers projected <strong>to</strong> triple <strong>in</strong> the next 25 years due <strong>to</strong> the ag<strong>in</strong>g of the population. DryARMD is more common than wet ARMD, account<strong>in</strong>g for 85% of all cases of ARMD. Thegreatest risk fac<strong>to</strong>r for acquir<strong>in</strong>g macular degeneration is age. Other risk fac<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>in</strong>clude gender(females more at risk than males), race (Caucasians more at risk than Blacks), smok<strong>in</strong>g, andfamily his<strong>to</strong>ry.Ret<strong>in</strong>itis pigmen<strong>to</strong>saThe worldwide prevalence of ret<strong>in</strong>itis pigmen<strong>to</strong>sa is approximately 1 <strong>in</strong> 4,000. Based on thisprevalence rate, approximately 8,500 <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong> Canada currently suffer from ret<strong>in</strong>itispigmen<strong>to</strong>sa.21.4 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of vision impairments result<strong>in</strong>g from medicaltreatmentsLaser surgery – LASIK and PRPThe <strong>in</strong>cidence of unresolved complications <strong>in</strong> refractive surgery (e.g. LASIK) patients sixmonths after surgery has been estimated <strong>to</strong> range from 3% <strong>to</strong> 6%.21.5 Vision impairments and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesMyopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and presbyopia (refractive errors) and low visionThere is a considerable body of research exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the relationship between static visual acuityand driv<strong>in</strong>g performance. Despite the obvious importance of vision when driv<strong>in</strong>g, research hasfailed <strong>to</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d a strong relationship between the two. One of the primary reasons for this ismethodological. Given that most jurisdictions have m<strong>in</strong>imum vision requirements for licens<strong>in</strong>g,<strong>in</strong>dividuals with significant vision impairments are not licensed and therefore not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong>measures of driv<strong>in</strong>g performance.261


Monocular visionResearch on monocular vision and driv<strong>in</strong>g is limited, with most studies conducted before 1980.The evidence suggests that monocular drivers have higher crash and traffic violation rates.Impaired contrast sensitivityIn general, the available research suggests that impairments <strong>in</strong> contrast sensitivity are associatedwith impairments <strong>in</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g performance. However, those associations are <strong>in</strong>sufficient <strong>to</strong>support specific decisions regard<strong>in</strong>g loss of contrast sensitivity and cont<strong>in</strong>ued driv<strong>in</strong>g. Moreresearch is required <strong>to</strong> develop screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>ols for contrast sensitivity that are valid and reliable<strong>in</strong> the driver fitness context.Dark adaptation and glare recoveryDespite its obvious relevance <strong>to</strong> safe driv<strong>in</strong>g performance, there is little <strong>in</strong> the way of research <strong>to</strong>assist the medical community or licens<strong>in</strong>g agency personnel <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g decisions related <strong>to</strong> darkadaptation, glare recovery, and driv<strong>in</strong>g.Visual field loss <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g hemianopiaA significant body of literature now exists on the relationship between visual field loss anddriv<strong>in</strong>g performance, as measured either by crashes, on-road performance, or from simula<strong>to</strong>rstudies. Few studies have been done on hemianopia and driv<strong>in</strong>g. Taken <strong>to</strong>gether, the resultsfrom the on road and crash literature suggest that visual field deficits can and do compromisedriv<strong>in</strong>g performance. However, the current body of evidence fails <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>form on the extent ofdeficit <strong>in</strong> the visual field that must be present before driv<strong>in</strong>g is impaired.Diplopia and NystagmusThere is little or no research on diplopia or nystagmus and driv<strong>in</strong>g performance.CataractsResults on the impact of cataracts on driv<strong>in</strong>g performance are mixed, with some studies show<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>creased risk of crashes, rang<strong>in</strong>g from 1.3 <strong>to</strong> 2.5 times higher than those without cataracts.However, other studies have failed <strong>to</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d an association between cataracts and crash rates.Results from studies that have exam<strong>in</strong>ed self-reported difficulties <strong>in</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g performance aremore uniform, with the majority of participants report<strong>in</strong>g difficulties <strong>in</strong> many aspects of driv<strong>in</strong>g.Notably, cataract surgery results <strong>in</strong> an improvement <strong>in</strong> visual function<strong>in</strong>g. However, asignificant percentage of <strong>in</strong>dividuals cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> report difficulties <strong>in</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g, particularly atnight. An important consideration is when driv<strong>in</strong>g can safely resume follow<strong>in</strong>g cataract surgery.Unfortunately, there is a paucity of data <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>form on this issue. Of equal importance are theeffects of wait times for cataract surgery on visual functions related <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g. Current literature262


<strong>in</strong>dicates that wait times of 6 months or longer result <strong>in</strong> decrements <strong>in</strong> vision that may have animpact on safe driv<strong>in</strong>g performance.Diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathyThe majority of research on diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathy and driv<strong>in</strong>g is concerned with the effects oflaser surgery (panret<strong>in</strong>al laser pho<strong>to</strong>coagulation [PRP]) for proliferative diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathy onvisual fields. PRP reduces the risk of severe visual loss <strong>in</strong> proliferative diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathy butalso is associated with visual field loss and reductions <strong>in</strong> peripheral vision. See the discussion ofvisual field loss and driv<strong>in</strong>g above.GlaucomaThere is evidence that <strong>in</strong>dividuals with glaucoma are at a significantly greater risk for impaireddriv<strong>in</strong>g performance than those without the disease, likely <strong>to</strong> due <strong>to</strong> loss of visual field. See thediscussion of visual field loss and driv<strong>in</strong>g above.Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) and ret<strong>in</strong>itis pigmen<strong>to</strong>saThere is little research on the relationship between ARMD or ret<strong>in</strong>itis pigmen<strong>to</strong>sa and driv<strong>in</strong>gperformance. See the discussion of visual field loss and driv<strong>in</strong>g above.21.6 Effect of vision impairments on functional ability <strong>to</strong> driveIndividuals with impaired visual acuity may lack the ability <strong>to</strong> perceive necessary details whiledriv<strong>in</strong>g. Visual field impairments may <strong>in</strong>terfere with driv<strong>in</strong>g by limit<strong>in</strong>g the area that an<strong>in</strong>dividual can see.Individuals with reduced contrast sensitivity may have difficulty see<strong>in</strong>g traffic lights or cars atnight. Limitations <strong>in</strong> research and test<strong>in</strong>g preclude guidel<strong>in</strong>es for impairments <strong>in</strong> contrastsensitivity, dark adaptation, or glare recovery, although some <strong>in</strong>dividuals with these impairmentsmay not be fit <strong>to</strong> drive.263


ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessmentapproachPrimaryfunctionalabilityaffectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsVision impairmentPersistentimpairment:FunctionalassessmentSensory -Vision<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportIC<strong>BC</strong> vision screen<strong>in</strong>gExam<strong>in</strong>ation of visualfunctions (EVF) (seesample form <strong>in</strong> 21.18)Visual field test (VFT)(see sample form <strong>in</strong>21.19)IC<strong>BC</strong> road testFunctional assessment byan occupational therapis<strong>to</strong>r driver rehabilitationspecialist21.7 CompensationThe loss of certa<strong>in</strong> visual functions can be compensated for adequately, particularly <strong>in</strong> the case oflong-stand<strong>in</strong>g or congenital impairments. When a person becomes visually impaired, thecapacity <strong>to</strong> drive safely varies with their ability <strong>to</strong> compensate. As a result, there are people withvisual deficits who do not meet the vision standards for driv<strong>in</strong>g but who are able <strong>to</strong> drive safely.Corrective lensesMost <strong>in</strong>dividuals can compensate for a typical loss of visual acuity from myopia, hyperopia,astigmatism, or presbyopia by wear<strong>in</strong>g eyeglasses or contact lenses.Telescopic lenses/other low vision aidsTelescopic (bioptic) lenses are sometimes used <strong>to</strong> assist <strong>in</strong>dividuals with low vision. Atelescopic lens typically is mounted at the <strong>to</strong>p half of a regular spectacle lens, and provides thedriver with a magnified view of objects (e.g., text or detail of traffic signs that otherwise could beseen only at distances <strong>to</strong>o short for a safe or timely s<strong>to</strong>p). For the most part, the driver views theroad through the spectacle lens, look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>termittently through the telescopic lens <strong>to</strong> read roadsigns, determ<strong>in</strong>e the status of traffic lights, or scan ahead for road hazards.264


Although telescopic spectacles, hemianopia aids and other low vision aids may enhance visualfunction, there are significant problems associated with their use <strong>in</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g a mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle.These <strong>in</strong>clude the loss of visual field, magnification caus<strong>in</strong>g apparent motion and the illusion ofnearness. There has been little research <strong>to</strong> evaluate the use of telescopic lenses for driv<strong>in</strong>g by<strong>in</strong>dividuals with low vision. Although limited, studies <strong>in</strong>dicate that drivers with low vision whodrive with telescopic lenses have higher crash rates. These studies were not controlled fordriv<strong>in</strong>g exposure, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that the crash rates per kilometre driven may be substantially higherthan reported.Given the known issues, OSMV currently does not allow the use of telescopic lenses for driv<strong>in</strong>g.Prism lenses/eye patchIndividuals with b<strong>in</strong>ocular diplopia may be able <strong>to</strong> compensate for their impairment with the useof prism lenses or an eye patch.Driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> daylight onlyIndividuals who have a vision impairment may be able <strong>to</strong> compensate for their impairment bydriv<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g daylight hours only.Strategies <strong>to</strong> compensate for visual field lossIndividuals with visual field loss may be able <strong>to</strong> compensate for their reduced visual field bypractic<strong>in</strong>g more rigorous scann<strong>in</strong>g techniques <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g more frequent eye and head movement.265


GUIDELINES21.8 Private drivers with impaired visual acuityApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have impaired visual acuity.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s visual acuity isrequired, OSMV will request: an Exam<strong>in</strong>ation of Visual Functions (EVF), or a vision screen<strong>in</strong>g at an IC<strong>BC</strong> Po<strong>in</strong>t of Service, if an <strong>in</strong>dividualdoes not live <strong>in</strong> a community with an op<strong>to</strong>metrist orophthalmologist.The recommended test<strong>in</strong>g procedures are outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 21.20.If an <strong>in</strong>dividual has a visual acuity of between 20/50 and 20/70 withboth eyes open and exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>to</strong>gether, OSMV will request an IC<strong>BC</strong>road test. OSMV will not generally request an IC<strong>BC</strong> road test for<strong>in</strong>dividuals who have a visual acuity of less than 20/70.Individuals may drive if they have visual acuity not less than 20/50(6/15) with both eyes open and exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>to</strong>gether.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they have visual acuity not less than 20/50 (6/15) with both eyesopen and exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>to</strong>gether, or a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have the functionalability required <strong>to</strong> drive a private vehicle.No conditions are required.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g restriction on an <strong>in</strong>dividual whorequires corrective lenses <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> meet the fitness guidel<strong>in</strong>es:# 21 Corrective lenses requiredIf the condition caus<strong>in</strong>g the impaired visual acuity is not progressive,no re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment, isrequired. This <strong>in</strong>cludes: myopia hyperopia, and astigmatism.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong>dividuals with cataracts annually until thecataracts are removed.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong>dividuals with macular degeneration annually.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong>dividuals with glaucoma and diabetic266


Policy rationaleret<strong>in</strong>opathy depend<strong>in</strong>g upon their visual acuity. Individuals with bestcorrected vision of 20/40 or better will be re-assessed every two years.Individuals with best corrected vision of 20/50 or worse will be reassessedannually.There is little research evidence regard<strong>in</strong>g the level of visual acuityrequired for driv<strong>in</strong>g fitness. The m<strong>in</strong>imum acuity requirement <strong>in</strong> theguidel<strong>in</strong>e is based on consensus medical op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> Canada. Becausethere is no def<strong>in</strong>itive level of acuity established for driv<strong>in</strong>g fitness,those who do not meet the acuity level <strong>in</strong> the guidel<strong>in</strong>e may request an<strong>in</strong>dividual functional assessment.267


21.9 Commercial drivers with impaired visual acuityApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for commercialdrivers who have impaired visual acuity.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s visual acuity isrequired, OSMV will request either: an Exam<strong>in</strong>ation of Visual Functions (EVF), or a vision screen<strong>in</strong>g at an IC<strong>BC</strong> Po<strong>in</strong>t of Service, if an <strong>in</strong>dividualdoes not live <strong>in</strong> a community with an op<strong>to</strong>metrist orophthalmologist.The recommended test<strong>in</strong>g procedures are outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 21.20.If an <strong>in</strong>dividual has a visual acuity of between 20/30 and 20/50 withboth eyes open and exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>to</strong>gether, OSMV will request an IC<strong>BC</strong>road test. OSMV will not generally request an IC<strong>BC</strong> road test for<strong>in</strong>dividuals who have a visual acuity of less than 20/50.Individuals may drive if they have visual acuity not less than 20/30(6/9) with both eyes open and exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>to</strong>gether.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they have visual acuity not less than 20/30 (6/9) with both eyesopen and exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>to</strong>gether, or a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have the functionalability required for their class of licence held.No conditions are required.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g restriction on an <strong>in</strong>dividual whorequires corrective lenses <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> meet the fitness guidel<strong>in</strong>es:# 21 Corrective lenses requiredIf the condition caus<strong>in</strong>g the impaired visual acuity is not progressive,no re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial re-assessment, isrequired. This <strong>in</strong>cludes: myopia hyperopia, and astigmatism.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong>dividuals with cataracts annually until thecataracts are removed.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong>dividuals with macular degeneration annually.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong>dividuals with glaucoma and diabeticret<strong>in</strong>opathy depend<strong>in</strong>g upon their visual acuity. Individuals with bestcorrected vision of 20/30 or better will be re-assessed every two years.268


Policy rationaleIndividuals with best corrected vision of 20/40 or worse will be reassessedannually.There is little research evidence regard<strong>in</strong>g the level of visual acuityrequired for driv<strong>in</strong>g fitness. The m<strong>in</strong>imum acuity requirement <strong>in</strong> theguidel<strong>in</strong>e is based on consensus medical op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> Canada. Becausethere is no def<strong>in</strong>itive level of acuity established for driv<strong>in</strong>g fitness,those who do not meet the acuity level <strong>in</strong> the guidel<strong>in</strong>e may request an<strong>in</strong>dividual functional assessment.269


21.10 Private drivers with visual field lossApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have visual field loss.<strong>Drive</strong>r fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations that <strong>in</strong>volve <strong>in</strong>terpretation of a visualfield study should be made by case managers.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s visual field loss isrequired, OSMV will request: an Exam<strong>in</strong>ation of Visual Functions (EVF) a b<strong>in</strong>ocular visual field test (VFT), or a vision screen<strong>in</strong>g at an IC<strong>BC</strong> Po<strong>in</strong>t of Service, if an <strong>in</strong>dividualdoes not live <strong>in</strong> a community with an op<strong>to</strong>metrist orophthalmologist.The recommended test<strong>in</strong>g procedures are outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 21.20.If an <strong>in</strong>dividual does not meet the visual field standard outl<strong>in</strong>ed below,OSMV may request: an IC<strong>BC</strong> road test, or if the visual field deficit is severe, an assessment by anoccupational therapist or driver rehabilitation specialist.Individuals may drive if their visual field is at least 120 cont<strong>in</strong>uousdegrees along the horizontal meridian and 15 cont<strong>in</strong>uous degreesabove and below fixation with both eyes open and exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>to</strong>gether.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: their visual field is at least 120 cont<strong>in</strong>uous degrees along thehorizontal meridian and 15 cont<strong>in</strong>uous degrees above and belowfixation with both eyes open and exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>to</strong>gether, or a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have the functionalability required <strong>to</strong> drive a private vehicle.No conditions are required.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g restriction if a functional assessment<strong>in</strong>dicates that an <strong>in</strong>dividual does not have the functional ability <strong>to</strong> driveat night:# 12 Restricted <strong>to</strong> daylight hours onlyIf the condition caus<strong>in</strong>g the visual field loss is not progressive, no reassessment,other than rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment, is required.This <strong>in</strong>cludes: eye trauma stroke, and head <strong>in</strong>jury.270


Re-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>es cont’dPolicy rationaleFor <strong>in</strong>dividuals with medical conditions that cause progressive visualfield loss, such as: ret<strong>in</strong>itis pigmen<strong>to</strong>sa diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathy vascular ret<strong>in</strong>opathy glaucoma, or bra<strong>in</strong> tumourOSMV will re-assess by issu<strong>in</strong>g an EVF every 1 <strong>to</strong> 3 years, depend<strong>in</strong>gupon the rate of progression and severity of the visual field loss.There is little research evidence regard<strong>in</strong>g the level of visual fieldrequired for driv<strong>in</strong>g fitness. The m<strong>in</strong>imum visual field requirement <strong>in</strong>the guidel<strong>in</strong>e is based on consensus medical op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> Canada.Because there is no def<strong>in</strong>itive level of visual field established fordriv<strong>in</strong>g fitness, those who do not meet the level of visual field required<strong>in</strong> the guidel<strong>in</strong>e may request an <strong>in</strong>dividual functional assessment.271


21.11 Commercial drivers with visual field lossApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for commercialdrivers who have visual field loss.<strong>Drive</strong>r fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations that <strong>in</strong>volve <strong>in</strong>terpretation of a visualfield study should be made by case managers.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s visual field loss isrequired, OSMV will request: an Exam<strong>in</strong>ation of Visual Functions (EVF) a b<strong>in</strong>ocular visual field test (VFT), or a vision screen<strong>in</strong>g at an IC<strong>BC</strong> Po<strong>in</strong>t of Service, if an <strong>in</strong>dividualdoes not live <strong>in</strong> a community with an op<strong>to</strong>metrist orophthalmologist.The recommended test<strong>in</strong>g procedures are outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 21.20.If an <strong>in</strong>dividual does not meet the visual field standard outl<strong>in</strong>ed below,OSMV may request: an IC<strong>BC</strong> road test, or if the visual field deficit is severe, an assessment by anoccupational therapist or driver rehabilitation specialist.Individuals may drive if their visual field is at least 150 cont<strong>in</strong>uousdegrees along the horizontal meridian and 20 cont<strong>in</strong>uous degreesabove and below fixation with both eyes open and exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>to</strong>getherOSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: their visual field is at least 150 cont<strong>in</strong>uous degrees along thehorizontal meridian and 20 cont<strong>in</strong>uous degrees above and belowfixation with both eyes open and exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>to</strong>gether, or a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have the functionalability required for their class of licence held.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If the condition caus<strong>in</strong>g the visual field loss is not progressive, no reassessment,other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial re-assessment, is required.This <strong>in</strong>cludes: eye trauma stroke, and head <strong>in</strong>jury.For <strong>in</strong>dividuals with medical conditions that cause progressive visualfield loss, such as: ret<strong>in</strong>itis pigmen<strong>to</strong>sa272


Re-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>es cont’dPolicy rationale vascular ret<strong>in</strong>opathy glaucoma, or bra<strong>in</strong> tumourOSMV will re-assess by issu<strong>in</strong>g an EVF every 1 <strong>to</strong> 3 years, depend<strong>in</strong>gupon the rate of progression and severity of the visual field loss.OSMV will re-assess commercial drivers with diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathyannually <strong>in</strong> accordance with the guidel<strong>in</strong>es for commercial driverswith diabetes.There is little research evidence regard<strong>in</strong>g the level of visual fieldrequired for driv<strong>in</strong>g fitness. The m<strong>in</strong>imum visual field requirement <strong>in</strong>the guidel<strong>in</strong>e is based on consensus medical op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> Canada.Because there is no def<strong>in</strong>itive level of visual field established fordriv<strong>in</strong>g fitness, those who do not meet the level of visual field required<strong>in</strong> the guidel<strong>in</strong>e may request an <strong>in</strong>dividual functional assessment.273


21.12 Private drivers with a loss of stereoscopic depth perception ormonocularityApplicationThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who: lose stereoscopic depth perception, or become monocular.Assessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleIndividuals may drive if sufficient time (typically 1 <strong>to</strong> 3 months) haselapsed s<strong>in</strong>ce their loss of stereoscopic depth perception <strong>to</strong> allow them<strong>to</strong> adjust and compensate for their change <strong>in</strong> vision.Individuals are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.No re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment, isrequired.Individuals with monocular vision can compensate for the loss ofstereoscopic depth perception by us<strong>in</strong>g visual cues such as the relativesize of objects and generally have adequate depth perception foreveryday activities such as driv<strong>in</strong>g. The Canadian OphthalmologicalSociety notes that a driver who has recently lost the sight of an eye orstereoscopic vision may require a few months <strong>to</strong> recover the ability <strong>to</strong>judge distance accurately.274


21.13 Commercial drivers with a loss of stereoscopic depth perception ormonocularityApplicationThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for commercialdrivers who: lose stereoscopic depth perception, or become monocular.Assessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es OSMV will request an IC<strong>BC</strong> road test.<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleIndividuals may drive if: they meet the fitness guidel<strong>in</strong>es for visual acuity and visual field it has been at least one month s<strong>in</strong>ce the loss of stereoscopic depthperception, and they complete a road test that <strong>in</strong>dicates they are able <strong>to</strong> compensatefor their change <strong>in</strong> vision.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if they successfully completean IC<strong>BC</strong> road test.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.No re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial re-assessment, isrequired.Individuals with monocular vision can compensate for the loss ofstereoscopic depth perception by us<strong>in</strong>g visual cues such as the relativesize of objects and generally have adequate depth perception foreveryday activities such as driv<strong>in</strong>g. The Canadian OphthalmologicalSociety notes that a driver who has recently lost the sight of an eye orstereoscopic vision may require a few months <strong>to</strong> recover the ability <strong>to</strong>judge distance accurately.For commercial drivers who lose stereoscopic depth perception afterbe<strong>in</strong>g licensed, a road test is required <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> confirm that they areable <strong>to</strong> compensate for the loss.275


21.14 Private and commercial drivers with diplopiaApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for private andcommercial drivers who have diplopia with<strong>in</strong> the central 40 degrees ofprimary gaze (i.e. 20 degrees <strong>to</strong> the left, right, above, and belowfixation).If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request an Exam<strong>in</strong>ationof Visual Functions (EVF).OSMV may request an IC<strong>BC</strong> road test if the diplopia is a newcondition and the treat<strong>in</strong>g ophthalmologist or op<strong>to</strong>metrist <strong>in</strong>dicates anyconcern about the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s ability <strong>to</strong> compensate for the condition.Individuals may drive if: the diplopia can be corrected us<strong>in</strong>g an eye patch or prism lenses <strong>to</strong>meet the guidel<strong>in</strong>e above, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g ophthalmologist or op<strong>to</strong>metrist <strong>in</strong>dicates that adequateadjustment has occurred.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the diplopia can be corrected us<strong>in</strong>g an eye patch or prism lenses sothat they no longer have diplopia with<strong>in</strong> the central 40 degrees ofprimary gaze, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g ophthalmologist or op<strong>to</strong>metrist, or a road test, <strong>in</strong>dicatesthat adequate adjustment has occurred.No conditions are required.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g restriction on an <strong>in</strong>dividual whorequires prism lenses <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> meet the fitness guidel<strong>in</strong>es:# 21 Corrective lenses requiredOSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g restriction on an <strong>in</strong>dividual whorequires an eye patch <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> meet the fitness guidel<strong>in</strong>es:# 51 Must patch one eye while driv<strong>in</strong>gIf the diplopia is the result of a progressive condition, OSMV will reassessas recommended by the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or <strong>in</strong> accordance withthe re-assessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es for that medical condition. Otherwise, nore-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-related reassessment,is required.Consensus medical op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> Canada <strong>in</strong>dicates that an <strong>in</strong>dividual whohas diplopia with<strong>in</strong> the central 40 degrees of primary gaze is unfit <strong>to</strong>drive. Where an <strong>in</strong>dividual can compensate for this impairment withthe use of an eye patch or prism lenses, they may be fit <strong>to</strong> drive.276


21.15 Private and commercial drivers with impaired colour visionApplicationThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for private andcommercial drivers who have impaired colour vision.Assessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleIndividuals may drive unless a lack of <strong>in</strong>sight or cognitive impairmentimpairs their ability <strong>to</strong> compensate for their deficit.Individuals are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.No re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-related reassessment,is required.Impaired colour vision is usually congenital and <strong>in</strong> general, <strong>in</strong>dividualslearn <strong>to</strong> compensate for the <strong>in</strong>ability <strong>to</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>guish colours whendriv<strong>in</strong>g. Therefore, colour vision impairments are not rout<strong>in</strong>elyconsidered by OSMV as a matter of driver fitness.277


21.16 Snellen chart and standard rat<strong>in</strong>gs of visual acuityStandard rat<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> feet and metresFeetMetres20/200 6/6020/100 6/3020/70 6/2120/50 6/1520/40 6/1220/30 6/920/25 6/7.520/20 6/620/15 6/4.520/10 6/3278


21.17 Visual field impairmentsTypes of visual field defects 13Type Description CausesLoss of all or part of thesuperior or <strong>in</strong>ferior half of theAltitud<strong>in</strong>alvisual field, but <strong>in</strong> no casefield defectdoes the defect cross thehorizontal medianArcuate sco<strong>to</strong>maB<strong>in</strong>asalfield defect(uncommon)BitemporalhemianopiaBl<strong>in</strong>d-spotenlargementCentral sco<strong>to</strong>maHomonymoushemianopiaConstriction ofthe peripheralfields leav<strong>in</strong>gonly a smallresidual centralfieldA small, arcuate-shaped fieldloss due <strong>to</strong> damage <strong>to</strong> theganglion cells that feed <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> aparticular part of the opticnerve head, which follows thearcuate shape of the nervefiber pattern; the defect doesnot cross the horizontalmedianLoss of all or part of themedial half of both visualfields; the defect does notcross the vertical medianLoss of all or part of thelateral half of both visualfields; the defect does notcross the vertical medianEnlargement of the normalbl<strong>in</strong>d spot at the optic nerveheadA loss of visual function <strong>in</strong>the middle of the visual field,typically affect<strong>in</strong>g the foveacentralisLoss of part or all of the lefthalf or right half of bothvisual fields; the defect doesnot cross the vertical medianLoss of the outer part of theentire visual field <strong>in</strong> one orboth eyesMore common: Ischemic optic neuropathy, hemibranchret<strong>in</strong>al artery occlusion, ret<strong>in</strong>al detachmentLess common: Glaucoma, optic nerve or chiasmal lesion,optic nerve colobomaMore common: GlaucomaLess common: Ischemic optic neuropathy (especiallynonarteritic), optic disk drusen, high myopiaMore common: Glaucoma, bitemporal ret<strong>in</strong>al disease(e.g., ret<strong>in</strong>itis pigmen<strong>to</strong>sa)Rare: Bilateral occipital disease, tumor or aneurysmcompress<strong>in</strong>g both optic nervesMore common: Chiasmal lesion (e.g., pituitary adenoma,men<strong>in</strong>gioma, craniopharyngioma, aneurysm, glioma)Less common: Tilted optic disksRare: Nasal ret<strong>in</strong>itis pigmen<strong>to</strong>saPapilledema, optic nerve drusen, optic nerve coloboma,myel<strong>in</strong>ated nerve fibers at the optic disk, drugs, myopicdisk with a crescentMacular disease; optic neuropathy (e.g., ischemic,Leber's hereditary, optic neuritis); optic atrophy (e.g.,from tumor compress<strong>in</strong>g the nerve, <strong>to</strong>xic/metabolicdisease); rarely, an occipital cortex lesionOptic tract or lateral geniculate body lesion; temporal,parietal, or occipital lobe lesion of the bra<strong>in</strong> (stroke andtumor more common; aneurysm and trauma lesscommon). Migra<strong>in</strong>e may cause a transient homonymoushemianopiaGlaucoma; ret<strong>in</strong>itis pigmen<strong>to</strong>sa or some other peripheralret<strong>in</strong>al disorder; chronic papilledema; after panret<strong>in</strong>alpho<strong>to</strong>coagulation; central ret<strong>in</strong>al artery occlusion withcilioret<strong>in</strong>al artery spar<strong>in</strong>g; bilateral occipital lobe<strong>in</strong>farction with macular spar<strong>in</strong>g; nonphysiologic visionloss; carc<strong>in</strong>oma-associated ret<strong>in</strong>opathy; rarely, drugs13 From http://www.merck.com/mmpe/sec09/ch098/ch098a.html - Adapted from The Wills Eye Manual, Douglas J.Rhee, M.D. and Mark F. Pyfer, M.D.© 1999 by Lipp<strong>in</strong>cott Williams & Wilk<strong>in</strong>s.279


Visual field defects diagram 1414 From http://www.merck.com/mmpe/sec09/ch098/ch098a.html280


21.18 Exam<strong>in</strong>ation of visual functions form (EVF)EXAMINATION OF VISUAL FUNCTIONS (EVF)Paid for by the Office of the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>rVehicles through the MSP Bill<strong>in</strong>g System (see form back)PERSONAL HEALTH NUMBER(MUST BE COMPLETED)OPTOMETRISTSMSP Fee Code 96224(EVF Only)ORMSP Fee Code 96223(EVF and VFT)The personal <strong>in</strong>formation on this form is collected under the authority of the Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicle Act, Medicare Protection Act, and the Freedom of Information andProtection of Privacy Act. The <strong>in</strong>formation provided will be used <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e your fitness <strong>to</strong> drive a mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle and allow the physician <strong>to</strong> bill through the BritishColumbia Medical Services Plan for the service. Personal <strong>in</strong>formation is protected from unauthorized use and disclosure <strong>in</strong> accordance with the Freedom ofInformation and Protection of Privacy Act and may be disclosed only as provided by that Act. If you have any questions about the collection, use and disclosure ofthe <strong>in</strong>formation collected, contact the Office of the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles at (250) 387-7747.THIS REPORT MUST BE COMPLETED IN FULL BY AN OPTOMETRIST AND RETURNED WITHIN 30DAYS TO THE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES<strong>Drive</strong>r’s Name:DL#:Licence Class:Date Issued:Date of Birth:Reason for This Exam<strong>in</strong>ation: This person has been referred <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e if he/she meets the vision guidel<strong>in</strong>es forthe class of driver’s licence <strong>in</strong>dicated above.1. BINOCULAR CENTRAL VISUAL ACUITYUNCORRECTED 20/ PRESENT CORRECTION 20/ BEST CORRECTION 20/2. BINOCULAR DEGREES OF CONTINUOUS HORIZONTAL FIELD OF VISION (WHILE WEARING CORRECTION)2.a BINOCULAR DEGREES OF CONTINUOUS FIELD OF VISION ABOVE AND BELOW FIXATION(WHILE WEARING CORRECTION)3. VISUAL FIELD DEFICIT NO YES IF YES, A VISUAL FIELD TEST IS REQUIRED.SEE REVERSE FOR APPROVED STUDY TYPES4. PROGRESSIVE EYE CONDITION NO YES IF YES, PROVIDE DIAGNOSIS AND DESCRIBE FULLY.5. DIPLOPIA IN CENTRAL FIELD(40 degrees) NO YES IF YES, HOW DOES THE DRIVER COMPENSATE?DESCRIBE FULLY6. OTHER SIGNIFICANT OCULARDEFECTS NO YES IF YES, PROVIDE DISGNOSIS AND DESCRIBE FULLY.7. WERE NEW LENSES FORDRIVING PRESCRIBED? NO YES281


EXAMINING OPTOMETRIST’S NAME AND ADDRESS(Use Rubber Stamp or Pr<strong>in</strong>t)EXAMINATION DATE(YYYY/MM/DD)SIGNATURE OF EXAMINING OPTOMETRISTTELEPHONE NUMBER:To the <strong>Drive</strong>r:Under section 29 of the Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicle Act the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles requires you <strong>to</strong> have this form completedfor one of the follow<strong>in</strong>g reasons: you failed a vision test at an IC<strong>BC</strong> <strong>Drive</strong>r Services Centre your recently reported visual status did not provide all the <strong>in</strong>formation we require it is time <strong>to</strong> review the status of your previously reported visual condition.This form must be completed and returned by the exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g op<strong>to</strong>metrist <strong>to</strong> the Office of the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>rVehicles with<strong>in</strong> 30 days. If approval is needed prior <strong>to</strong> obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a driver’s licence, you will be unable <strong>to</strong> obta<strong>in</strong> that licenceuntil the completed form is submitted and approved. If this exam<strong>in</strong>ation is required for a class of licence you already have,your driver’s licence may be cancelled if you fail <strong>to</strong> have the form completed and submitted <strong>to</strong> the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent by yourop<strong>to</strong>metrist with<strong>in</strong> 30 days. If your driver’s licence is cancelled, you will not be able <strong>to</strong> drive until the form is submittedand you are issued a new driver’s licence.If your driver’s licence is presently cancelled due <strong>to</strong> a visual condition, this report must be completed and returned by yourop<strong>to</strong>metrist before your driv<strong>in</strong>g privilege can be considered for re<strong>in</strong>statement.If you have a visual condition that may deteriorate, you may need future visual exam<strong>in</strong>ations.The Office of the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles is billed through the Medical Services Plan (MSP) for complet<strong>in</strong>g thisform and reimburses op<strong>to</strong>metrists as follows: Exam<strong>in</strong>ation of Visual Functions only: $ 70 Exam<strong>in</strong>ation of Visual Functions and Visual Field Test at the same appo<strong>in</strong>tment: $102Should you have questions please contact the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Unit, Office of the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles, Vic<strong>to</strong>riaat (250) 387-7747.To the op<strong>to</strong>metrist:This Exam<strong>in</strong>ation of Visual Functions is paid by the Office of the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles and is billedthrough the Medical Services Plan Bill<strong>in</strong>g System. If a computer-assisted visual field test is required it is also billablethrough MSP. Please refer <strong>to</strong> the MSP Fee Codes located at the <strong>to</strong>p right corner of the first page of this document.282


VISUAL FIELD TEST (VFT)For drivers with visual field deficits, one of the follow<strong>in</strong>g techniques should be documented andthe visual field pr<strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong>ut attachedBINOCULAR TESTING IS REQUIREDClass 5-8 drivers require test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> 120 degrees of horizontal vision.Class 1-4 drivers require test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> 150 degrees of horizontal vision. Goldmann, Esterman, andHumphreys 135 are the only tests that will provide test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> 150 degrees.1. Goldmann III4e and V4e isopters2. Humphrey Esterman test3. Humphrey 81, 120, 135, or 246 po<strong>in</strong>t screener. If field is abnormal, set test strategy <strong>to</strong> 3 zone and all otherparameters <strong>to</strong> standard. Two zone Humphrey test<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>in</strong>adequate.4. Medmont 700 Driv<strong>in</strong>g Field us<strong>in</strong>g the numeric grid format. Studio format is NOT ACCEPTABLE.DRIVER’S LICENCE CLASSIFICATIONSClass 1 Public passenger carry<strong>in</strong>g and heavy commercialvehiclesClass 2 Large public passenger carry<strong>in</strong>g vehiclesClass 3 Heavy commercial vehiclesClass 4 Public passenger carry<strong>in</strong>g vehiclesClass 5 Passenger vehiclesClass 5 with endorsements 18 or 19 are assessed <strong>to</strong> Class 1StandardsClass 5 with endorsement 20 is assessed <strong>to</strong> Class 3 StandardsClass 6 Mo<strong>to</strong>rcyclesClass 7 Learner driver’s licence, passenger vehiclesClass 8 Learner driver’s licence, mo<strong>to</strong>rcycles283


21.19 Visual field test form (VFT)VISUAL FIELD TESTPaid for by the Office of the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles through theMSP Bill<strong>in</strong>g System (see form back)OPTOMETRISTSMSP Fee Code 96225PERSONAL HEALTH NUMBER(MUST BE COMPLETED)The personal <strong>in</strong>formation on this form is collected under the authority of the Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicle Act, Medicare Protection Act, and theFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. The <strong>in</strong>formation provided will be used <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e your fitness <strong>to</strong> drivea mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle and allow the physician <strong>to</strong> bill through the British Columbia Medical Services Plan for the service. Personal<strong>in</strong>formation is protected from unauthorized use and disclosure <strong>in</strong> accordance with the Freedom of Information and Protection ofPrivacy Act and may be disclosed only as provided by that Act. If you have any questions about the collection, use anddisclosure of the <strong>in</strong>formation collected, contact the Office of the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles at (250) 387-7747.THIS REPORT MUST BE COMPLETED IN FULL BY AN OPTOMETRIST AND RETURNED WITHIN 30 DAYS TO THEOFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES<strong>Drive</strong>r’s Name:DL#:Date Issued:Licence Class:Date of Birth:Reason For This Exam<strong>in</strong>ation: This person has been referred <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e if he/she meets the vision guidel<strong>in</strong>es for the class ofdriver’s licence <strong>in</strong>dicated above.VISUAL FIELD TEST (VFT)For drivers with visual field deficits, one of the follow<strong>in</strong>g techniques should be documented andthe visual field pr<strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong>ut attachedBINOCULAR TESTING IS REQUIREDClass 5-8 drivers require test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> 120 degrees of horizontal vision.Class 1-4 drivers require test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> 150 degrees of horizontal vision. Goldmann, Esterman, and Humphreys 135 are the onlytests that will provide test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> 150 degrees.1. Goldmann III4e and V4e isopters2. Humphrey Esterman test3. Humphrey 81, 120, 135, or 246 po<strong>in</strong>t screener. If field is abnormal, set test strategy <strong>to</strong> 3 zone and all other parameters <strong>to</strong>standard. Two zone Humphrey test<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>in</strong>adequate.4. Medmont 700 Driv<strong>in</strong>g Field us<strong>in</strong>g the numeric grid format. Studio format is NOT ACCEPTABLE.EXAMINING OPTOMETRIST’S NAME AND ADDRESS(Use Rubber Stamp or Pr<strong>in</strong>t)EXAMINATION DATE(YYYY/MM/DD)SIGNATURE OF EXAMINING OPTOMETRISTTELEPHONE NUMBER:284


To the <strong>Drive</strong>r:Under section 29 of the Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicle Act the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles requires you <strong>to</strong> have this form completedfor one of the follow<strong>in</strong>g reasons:your recently reported visual status did not provide all the <strong>in</strong>formation we requireit is time <strong>to</strong> review the status of your previously reported visual condition.This form must be completed and returned by the exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g op<strong>to</strong>metrist <strong>to</strong> the Office of the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>rVehicles with<strong>in</strong> 30 days. If approval is needed prior <strong>to</strong> obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a driver’s licence, you will be unable <strong>to</strong> obta<strong>in</strong> that licenceuntil the completed form is submitted and approved. If this exam<strong>in</strong>ation is required for a class of licence you already have,your driver’s licence may be cancelled if you fail <strong>to</strong> have the form completed and submitted <strong>to</strong> the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent by yourop<strong>to</strong>metrist with<strong>in</strong> 30 days. If your driver’s licence is cancelled, you will not be able <strong>to</strong> drive until the form is submitted andyou are issued a new driver’s licence.If your driver’s licence is presently cancelled due <strong>to</strong> a visual condition, this report must be completed and returned by yourop<strong>to</strong>metrist before your driv<strong>in</strong>g privilege can be considered for re<strong>in</strong>statement.If you have a visual condition that may deteriorate, you may need future visual exam<strong>in</strong>ations.The Office of the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles is billed through the Medical Services Plan (MSP) and reimbursesop<strong>to</strong>metrists $42 for complet<strong>in</strong>g this formShould you have questions please contact the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Unit, Office of the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles, Vic<strong>to</strong>riaat (250) 387-7747.To the op<strong>to</strong>metrist:This Visual Field Test is paid by the Office of the Super<strong>in</strong>tendent of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicles and is billed through the Medical ServicesPlan Bill<strong>in</strong>g System. Please refer <strong>to</strong> the MSP Fee Code located at the <strong>to</strong>p right corner of the first page of this document.DRIVER’S LICENCE CLASSIFICATIONSClass 1 Public passenger carry<strong>in</strong>g and heavy commercialvehiclesClass 2 Large public passenger carry<strong>in</strong>g vehiclesClass 3 Heavy commercial vehiclesClass 4 Public passenger carry<strong>in</strong>g vehiclesClass 5 Passenger vehiclesClass 5 with endorsements 18 or 19 are assessed <strong>to</strong> Class 1StandardsClass 5 with endorsement 20 is assessed <strong>to</strong> Class 3 StandardsClass 6 Mo<strong>to</strong>rcyclesClass 7 Learner driver’s licence, passenger vehiclesClass 8 Learner driver’s licence, mo<strong>to</strong>rcycles285


21.20 Recommended procedures for test<strong>in</strong>g visual functionsVisual acuityThe distance visual acuity of applicants should be tested us<strong>in</strong>g the refractive correction(spectacles or contact lenses) that they will use for driv<strong>in</strong>g. The exam<strong>in</strong>er should assess visualacuity under b<strong>in</strong>ocular (both eyes open) or monocular conditions if required by the standard. It isrecommended that visual acuity be assessed us<strong>in</strong>g a Snellen chart or equivalent at the distanceappropriate for the chart under bright pho<strong>to</strong>pic light<strong>in</strong>g conditions of 275 <strong>to</strong> 375 lux (or greaterthan 80 candelas/m2). Charts that are designed <strong>to</strong> be used at 3 meters or greater arerecommended.Visual fieldWhen a confrontational field assessment is carried out <strong>to</strong> screen for visual field defects thefollow<strong>in</strong>g procedure is recommended as a m<strong>in</strong>imum:1. The exam<strong>in</strong>er is stand<strong>in</strong>g or seated approximately 0.6 m (2 feet) <strong>in</strong> front of the exam<strong>in</strong>eewith eyes at about the same level.2. The exam<strong>in</strong>er asks the exam<strong>in</strong>ee <strong>to</strong> fixate on the nose of the exam<strong>in</strong>er with both eyesopen.3. The exam<strong>in</strong>er extends his or her arms forward, position<strong>in</strong>g the hands halfway betweenthe exam<strong>in</strong>ee and the exam<strong>in</strong>er. With arms fully extended, the exam<strong>in</strong>er asks theexam<strong>in</strong>ee <strong>to</strong> confirm when a mov<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ger is detected.4. The exam<strong>in</strong>er should confirm that the ability <strong>to</strong> detect the mov<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ger is cont<strong>in</strong>uouslypresent throughout the area specified <strong>in</strong> the applicable visual field standard. Test<strong>in</strong>g isrecommended <strong>in</strong> an area of at least 180° horizontal and 40° vertical, centred aroundfixation.If a defect is detected, the <strong>in</strong>dividual should be referred <strong>to</strong> an ophthalmologist or op<strong>to</strong>metrist fora full assessment.When a full assessment is required, the follow<strong>in</strong>g techniques are acceptable:1. Goldmann III/4e and V4e isopters2. Humphrey Esterman test3. Humphrey 81, 120, 135, or 246 po<strong>in</strong>t screener. Set test strategy <strong>to</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>in</strong>tensity or 3zone and all other parameters <strong>to</strong> standard. Two zone Humphrey test<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>in</strong>adequate.4. Medmont 700 Driv<strong>in</strong>g Field5. Other visual field techniques will be accepted if appropriate.286


Please note:Goldman, Esterman and Humphrey 135 are the only tests that will test 150 degreesof horizontal vision as required for professional (class 1 <strong>to</strong> 4) drivers.B<strong>in</strong>ocular test<strong>in</strong>g is always preferred. If a monocular test of the type noted above isavailable from the patient’s file, it may suffice, but if the driver requires new fieldtest<strong>in</strong>g, please request b<strong>in</strong>ocular fields.Some au<strong>to</strong>mated test<strong>in</strong>g devices used <strong>in</strong> driver test<strong>in</strong>g centres have a procedure for assess<strong>in</strong>gvisual field. However, these tests are often <strong>in</strong>sensitive <strong>to</strong> many types of visual field defects andthus may not be adequate for screen<strong>in</strong>g purposes.DiplopiaAny patient report<strong>in</strong>g double vision should be referred <strong>to</strong> an ophthalmologist or op<strong>to</strong>metrist forfurther assessment.Contrast sensitivityAssessment of contrast sensitivity is recommended for applicants referred <strong>to</strong> an ophthalmologis<strong>to</strong>r op<strong>to</strong>metrist for vision problems related <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g. Contrast sensitivity may be a more valuable<strong>in</strong>dica<strong>to</strong>r of visual performance <strong>in</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g than Snellen acuity. The COS therefore encourages<strong>in</strong>creased use of this test as a supplement <strong>to</strong> visual acuity assessment.Contrast sensitivity can be measured by means of several commercially available <strong>in</strong>struments:the Pelli-Robson letter contrast sensitivity chart; either the 25% or the 11% Regan low-contrastacuity chart; the Bailey-Lovie low-contrast acuity chart or the VisTech contrast sensitivity test.The test<strong>in</strong>g procedures and conditions recommended for the specific test used should befollowed.Depth perceptionThere are no cl<strong>in</strong>ical tests available for assess<strong>in</strong>g depth perception other than those used forstereopsis. If stereopsis assessment is required, the Titmus test can be used.Dark adaptation and glare recoveryCurrently there are no standardized tests or procedures that can be recommended for assess<strong>in</strong>gthese functions.287


Chapter 22: SyncopeBACKGROUND22.1 About syncopeSyncope refers <strong>to</strong> a partial or complete loss of consciousness, usually result<strong>in</strong>g from a temporaryreduction <strong>in</strong> blood flow <strong>to</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong>. The onset of syncope is relatively rapid and recovery isgenerally prompt, spontaneous and complete. The non-medical term for syncope is fa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g.Syncope has many different causes, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cardiovascular disease and neurological disorders.In some cases, no underly<strong>in</strong>g cause can be found.The follow<strong>in</strong>g are the major types of syncope: vasovagal syncope postural syncope, and cardiac syncope.The most common types of syncope are vasovagal (neurocardiogenic) and cardiac syncope.Vasovagal syncopeVasovagal or neurocardiogenic syncope refers <strong>to</strong> syncope that is triggered by an exaggerated and<strong>in</strong>appropriate nervous system response <strong>to</strong> a particular stimulus. The response is characterized byalterations <strong>in</strong> heart rate and blood flow, with a subsequent reduction <strong>in</strong> blood pressure. Thestimulus can be any of a wide range of events such as: dehydration <strong>in</strong>tense emotional stress anxiety fear pa<strong>in</strong> hunger, or the use of alcohol or drugs.Stimuli can also <strong>in</strong>clude forceful cough<strong>in</strong>g, turn<strong>in</strong>g of the neck or wear<strong>in</strong>g a tight collar (carotids<strong>in</strong>us hypersensitivity), or ur<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g (micturition syncope).Postural syncopePostural syncope is syncope that results from a sudden drop <strong>in</strong> blood pressure immediately afterstand<strong>in</strong>g or sitt<strong>in</strong>g up. It can be a side-effect of some medications or may be caused bydehydration or medical conditions such as Park<strong>in</strong>son’s disease.288


Cardiac syncopeCardiac syncope refers <strong>to</strong> syncope caused by cardiac conditions such as: valvular heart disease chronic heart failure, or arrhythmias (bradycardias or tachycardias).Cardiac arrhythmias are the most common cause of cardiac syncope.22.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of syncopeThe prevalence of syncope is difficult <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e. One study reported that 3% of males and3.5% of females had at least one episode of syncope over a 26 year period. The CanadianCardiovascular Society estimates that syncope may affect as many as 50% of Canadians at somepo<strong>in</strong>t dur<strong>in</strong>g their life. Higher rates of syncope are reported <strong>in</strong> older <strong>in</strong>dividuals.22.3 Syncope and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesFew studies have considered the relationship between syncope and driv<strong>in</strong>g. Of those that have,most <strong>in</strong>dicate a relationship between syncope and impaired driv<strong>in</strong>g performance for at least somegroups that experience syncope.22.4 Effect of syncope on functional ability <strong>to</strong> driveSyncope causes an episodic impairment of all the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g.ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessmentapproachPrimaryfunctionalabilityaffectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsSyncopeEpisodicimpairment:Medical assessment– likelihood ofimpairmentAll – sudden<strong>in</strong>capacitation<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s report289


22.5 CompensationAs syncope causes an episodic impairment of the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, compensationdoes not apply.GUIDELINESThe follow<strong>in</strong>g table <strong>in</strong>dicates the guidel<strong>in</strong>es applicable <strong>to</strong> the various types of syncope that maybe experienced by private and commercial drivers.S<strong>in</strong>gleepisodeRecurrentType of syncope<strong>Guide</strong>l<strong>in</strong>es forprivate drivers<strong>Guide</strong>l<strong>in</strong>es forcommercialdriversTypical vasovagal 22.7 22.11Unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed 22.7 22.14Atypical vasovagal 22.7 22.14Reversible, diagnosed or treated cause 22.8 22.12Typical vasovagal 22.9 22.14Situational 22.9 22.13Unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed 22.10 22.14Atypical vasovagal 22.10 22.1422.6 Policy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es are based primarily on recommendations conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al report of the2003 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Consensus Conference Assessment of the CardiacPatient for <strong>Fitness</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Drive</strong> and Fly. When apply<strong>in</strong>g these guidel<strong>in</strong>es, the CCS <strong>in</strong>dicates thatwait<strong>in</strong>g periods may be modified based on <strong>in</strong>dividual fac<strong>to</strong>rs such as length of any reliablewarn<strong>in</strong>g symp<strong>to</strong>ms (prodrome), reversible or avoidable precipitat<strong>in</strong>g fac<strong>to</strong>rs, and position fromwhich the <strong>in</strong>dividual experiences syncope.290


22.7 Private drivers who have had a s<strong>in</strong>gle episode of syncopeThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have had a s<strong>in</strong>gle episode of: typical vasovagal syncope unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed syncope, or atypical vasovagal syncope.ApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esTypical vasovagal syncope is a vasovagal syncope that occurs whenstand<strong>in</strong>g and is preceded by warn<strong>in</strong>g signs that are sufficient <strong>to</strong> allowa driver <strong>to</strong> pull off the road before los<strong>in</strong>g consciousness.Atypical vasovagal syncope is a vasovagal syncope that occurs <strong>in</strong> thesitt<strong>in</strong>g position or is not preceded by warn<strong>in</strong>g signs that are sufficient<strong>to</strong> allow a driver <strong>to</strong> pull off the road before los<strong>in</strong>g consciousness.OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.Individuals who have a s<strong>in</strong>gle episode of typical vasovagal syncopemay drive.Individuals who have a s<strong>in</strong>gle episode of unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed syncope oratypical vasovagal syncope may drive if it has been at least 1 weeks<strong>in</strong>ce their last episode of syncope.Individuals are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g condition on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who hashad a s<strong>in</strong>gle episode of unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed or atypical vasovagal syncopewho is found fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician if you have anotherepisode of syncope.No restrictions are required.No re-assessment is required after an episode of typical vasovagalsyncope. If an episode of unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed syncope or atypical vasovagalsyncope occurred with<strong>in</strong> the past 12 months, OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong>one year. If no further episodes are reported at that time, no furtherre-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment isrequired.291


22.8 Private drivers with syncope with a treated or reversible causeApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have: syncope with a reversible cause, or syncope with a diagnosed and treated cause (e.g., pacemaker forbradycardia).OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.Individuals who experience syncope with a reversible cause maydrive if the cause has been successfully treated.Individuals with syncope where the cause has been diagnosed andtreated may drive if it has been at least 1 week s<strong>in</strong>ce successfultreatment.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if the cause of the syncopehas been successfully treated.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g condition on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician if you have anotherepisode of syncope.No restrictions are required.No re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment isrequired, unless re-assessment is required because of the underly<strong>in</strong>gmedical condition or treatment.292


22.9 Private drivers with recurrent typical vasovagal syncope or situationalsyncopeApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have had two or more episodes of : typical vasovagal syncope, or situational syncope with an avoidable trigger (e.g., micturitionsyncope, defecation syncope)with<strong>in</strong> a 12 month period.OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.Individuals who experience recurrent situational syncope with anavoidable trigger may drive if it has been at least 1 week s<strong>in</strong>ce theirlast episode of syncope.Individuals who have recurrent episodes of vasovagal syncope maydrive if it has been at least 1 week s<strong>in</strong>ce their last episode of syncope.Individuals are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.No re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment isrequired for <strong>in</strong>dividuals with situational syncope.For <strong>in</strong>dividuals with recurrent typical vasovagal syncope, OSMV willre-assess <strong>in</strong> one year. If no further episodes of syncope are reportedat that time, no further re-assessment is required, other than rout<strong>in</strong>eage-related re-assessment.293


22.10 Private drivers with recurrent atypical vasovagal syncope or unexpla<strong>in</strong>edsyncopeApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have had two or more episodes of : atypical vasovagal syncope, or unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed syncopewith<strong>in</strong> a 12 month period.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.Individuals may drive if it has been at least 3 months s<strong>in</strong>ce their lastepisode of syncope.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if it has been at least 3months s<strong>in</strong>ce their last episode of syncope.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g condition on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician if you have anotherepisode of syncope.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> one year. If no further episodes of syncopeare reported at that time, no further re-assessment is required, otherthan rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment.294


22.11 Commercial drivers who have had a s<strong>in</strong>gle episode of typical vasovagalsyncopeApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers who have had a s<strong>in</strong>gle episode of typicalvasovagal syncope with<strong>in</strong> a 12 month period.Typical vasovagal syncope is a vasovagal syncope that occurs whenstand<strong>in</strong>g and is preceded by warn<strong>in</strong>g signs that are sufficient <strong>to</strong> allowa driver <strong>to</strong> pull off the road before los<strong>in</strong>g consciousness.OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.No restrictions.Individuals are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g condition on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician if you have anotherepisode of syncope.No restrictions are required.No re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial re-assessment, isrequired.295


22.12 Commercial drivers with syncope with a treated or reversible causeApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers who have: syncope with a reversible cause, or syncope with a diagnosed and treated cause (e.g., pacemaker forbradycardia).OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.Individuals who experience syncope with a reversible cause maydrive if the cause has been successfully treated.Individuals with syncope where the cause has been diagnosed andtreated may drive if it has been at least 1 month s<strong>in</strong>ce successfultreatment.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if the cause of the syncopehas been successfully treated.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g condition on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician if you have anotherepisode of syncope.No restrictions are required.No re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial re-assessment isrequired, unless re-assessment is required because of the underly<strong>in</strong>gmedical condition or treatment.296


22.13 Commercial drivers with recurrent situational syncopeApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have had two or more episodes of situational syncopewith an avoidable trigger (e.g., micturition syncope, defecationsyncope) with<strong>in</strong> a 12 month period.OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.Individuals may drive if it has been at least 1 week s<strong>in</strong>ce their lastepisode of syncope.Individuals are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.No re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial re-assessment, isrequired.297


22.14 Commercial drivers with atypical vasovagal syncope, unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed syncopeor recurrent typical vasovagal syncopeApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers who have had: s<strong>in</strong>gle or recurrent atypical vasovagal syncope s<strong>in</strong>gle or recurrent unexpla<strong>in</strong>ed syncope, or recurrent typical vasovagal syncopewith<strong>in</strong> a 12 month period.Typical vasovagal syncope is a vasovagal syncope that occurs whenstand<strong>in</strong>g and is preceded by warn<strong>in</strong>g signs that are sufficient <strong>to</strong> allowa driver <strong>to</strong> pull off the road before los<strong>in</strong>g consciousness.Atypical vasovagal syncope is a vasovagal syncope that occurs <strong>in</strong> thesitt<strong>in</strong>g position or is not preceded by warn<strong>in</strong>g signs that are sufficient<strong>to</strong> allow a driver <strong>to</strong> pull off the road before los<strong>in</strong>g consciousness.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report, or additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.Individuals may drive if it has been at least 12 months s<strong>in</strong>ce their lastepisode of syncope.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if it has been at least 12months s<strong>in</strong>ce their last episode of syncope.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow your treatment regime and physician’sadvice regard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of syncope, and you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician if you have anotherepisode of syncope.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> one year. If no further episodes of syncopeare reported at that time, no further re-assessment is required, otherthan rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial re-assessment.298


Chapter 23: Seizures and EpilepsyBACKGROUND23.1 About seizures and epilepsySeizuresA seizure is caused by a sudden electrical discharge <strong>in</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong>. A seizure does not alwaysmean that a person falls <strong>to</strong> the ground <strong>in</strong> convulsions. It can be manifested <strong>in</strong> various ways,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: feel<strong>in</strong>gs of be<strong>in</strong>g absent visual dis<strong>to</strong>rtions nausea vertigo t<strong>in</strong>gl<strong>in</strong>g twitch<strong>in</strong>g shak<strong>in</strong>g rigidity of parts of the body or the entire body, or an alteration or loss of consciousness.Seizures may occur <strong>in</strong> people who do not have epilepsy. These non-epileptic seizures are oftenreferred <strong>to</strong> as provoked seizures. Some are caused by transient fac<strong>to</strong>rs with no structural bra<strong>in</strong>abnormality such as: fever low blood sugar electrolyte imbalance head trauma men<strong>in</strong>gitis simple fa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g, and alcohol or drug <strong>to</strong>xicity or withdrawal.Others are caused by conditions where there is a structural bra<strong>in</strong> abnormality such as a: tumour stroke aneurysm, or hema<strong>to</strong>ma.Provoked seizures are not epilepsy, and they resolve after the provok<strong>in</strong>g fac<strong>to</strong>r has resolved orstabilized.Sometimes people appear <strong>to</strong> have seizures, even though their bra<strong>in</strong>s show no seizure activity.This phenomenon is called a non-epileptic psychogenic seizure (NEPS), sometimes referred <strong>to</strong> as299


a pseudoseizure, and is psychological <strong>in</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>. Some people with epilepsy have NEPS <strong>in</strong>addition <strong>to</strong> their epileptic seizures. Other people who have NEPS do not have epilepsy at all.EpilepsyEpilepsy refers <strong>to</strong> a condition characterized by recurrent (at least two) seizures, which do nothave a transient provok<strong>in</strong>g cause. The cause of the epileptic seizures may be known or unknown(idiopathic). About two-thirds of epilepsy <strong>in</strong> young adults is idiopathic, but more than half ofepilepsy <strong>in</strong> those 65 and older has a known cause. Known causes of epilepsy <strong>in</strong>clude permanentstructural bra<strong>in</strong> abnormality such as scarr<strong>in</strong>g from: stroke prior surgery head <strong>in</strong>jury <strong>in</strong>fections tumours aneurysms, or arteriovenous malformations.Types of seizuresSeizures are divided <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> two ma<strong>in</strong> categories: partial (also called focal or local) seizures andgeneralized seizures. A partial seizure is a seizure that arises from an electrical discharge <strong>in</strong> onepart of the bra<strong>in</strong>. A generalized seizure is caused by discharges throughout the bra<strong>in</strong>.Partial seizuresThere are three types of partial seizures: simple partial seizures complex partial seizures, and partial seizures (simple or complex) that evolve <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> secondary generalized seizures (seebelow).The difference between simple and complex seizures is that <strong>in</strong>dividuals experienc<strong>in</strong>g simplepartial seizures reta<strong>in</strong> awareness dur<strong>in</strong>g the seizure, whereas those experienc<strong>in</strong>g complex partialseizures lose awareness dur<strong>in</strong>g the seizure.Symp<strong>to</strong>ms of partial seizures depend on which part of the bra<strong>in</strong> is affected. They may <strong>in</strong>cludeone or more of the follow<strong>in</strong>g: head turn<strong>in</strong>g eye movements mouth movements lip smack<strong>in</strong>g drool<strong>in</strong>g apparently purposeful movements rhythmic muscle contractions <strong>in</strong> a part of the body300


abnormal numbnesst<strong>in</strong>gl<strong>in</strong>g and a crawl<strong>in</strong>g sensation over the sk<strong>in</strong>sensory disturbances such as smell<strong>in</strong>g or hear<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs that are not there, orhav<strong>in</strong>g a sudden flood of emotions.Individuals who have partial seizures, especially complex partial seizures, may experience anaura, i.e. unusual sensations that warn of an impend<strong>in</strong>g seizure. An aura is actually a simplepartial seizure. The aura symp<strong>to</strong>ms an <strong>in</strong>dividual experiences and the progression of thosesymp<strong>to</strong>ms tend <strong>to</strong> be similar every time.Generalized seizuresTypes of generalized seizures and their symp<strong>to</strong>ms are listed <strong>in</strong> the table below.Type of Generalized SeizureAbsenceMyoclonicClonicTonicTonic-clonic or ‘grand mal’A<strong>to</strong>nicSymp<strong>to</strong>msBrief loss of consciousnessSporadic (isolated), jerk<strong>in</strong>g movementsRepetitive, jerk<strong>in</strong>g movementsMuscle stiffness, rigidityUnconsciousness, convulsions, muscle rigidityLoss of muscle <strong>to</strong>neMost common seizuresThe three most common types of seizures <strong>in</strong> adults are: generalized <strong>to</strong>nic-clonic or grand mal seizures complex partial seizures, and simple partial seizures.Approximately one-third of all <strong>in</strong>dividuals with epilepsy have complex partial seizures, with theprevalence <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> one-half <strong>in</strong> those with epilepsy who are 65 and older.Recurrence of seizuresThe estimated risk of a recurrence after an <strong>in</strong>itial unprovoked seizure ranges from 23% <strong>to</strong> 71%,with the average risk of recurrence for adults be<strong>in</strong>g 43%. If the seizure is idiopathic (i.e. thecause is unknown) and the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s electroencephalogram (EEG) is normal, the risk ofrecurrence is reduced. Individuals who experience a partial seizure and have an abnormal EEGor other neurological abnormality, have an <strong>in</strong>creased risk for seizure recurrence. A familyhis<strong>to</strong>ry of epilepsy also <strong>in</strong>creases the risk of recurrence.Treatment for seizures and epilepsySeizure patterns <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals with epilepsy may change over time, and seizures may eventuallys<strong>to</strong>p. Epilepsy is generally treated with anticonvulsant drugs (anti-epileptics) and is sometimestreated with surgery <strong>to</strong> remove the source of epilepsy from the bra<strong>in</strong>. Recent studies <strong>in</strong>dicate that301


more than half of newly diagnosed <strong>in</strong>dividuals with epilepsy can achieve seizure control withanti-epileptic drugs. Many of those who achieve seizure control are eventually able <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>ptak<strong>in</strong>g anti-epileptic drugs and rema<strong>in</strong> seizure-free. However, the relapse rate with drugwithdrawal is at least 30 <strong>to</strong> 40%. For a further discussion of the impact of anti-epileptics ondriv<strong>in</strong>g, see Chapter 29 – Psychotropic Drugs.23.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of seizures and epilepsyResearch <strong>in</strong>dicates that up <strong>to</strong> 9% of the general population will have at least one seizure.Epilepsy has an overall prevalence rate of 0.6% <strong>in</strong> Canada, with an estimated <strong>in</strong>cidence of15,500 new cases per year (2003). The table below shows the prevalence of epilepsy <strong>in</strong> Canadaby age. 15Age (years) Prevalence (%) Age (years) Prevalence (%)0 – 11 0.3 25 – 44 0.712 – 14 0.6 46 – 64 0.716 – 24 0.6 > 65 0.723.3 Seizures and epilepsy and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesResearch <strong>in</strong>dicates that, <strong>in</strong> general, <strong>in</strong>dividuals with epilepsy have an <strong>in</strong>creased risk for adversedriv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes. Variability <strong>in</strong> the methodology and study results makes it difficult <strong>to</strong>determ<strong>in</strong>e the extent of the <strong>in</strong>creased risk.Studies of crash rates <strong>in</strong>dicate that the follow<strong>in</strong>g fac<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>in</strong>crease the risk of crash for those withepilepsy: age – younger drivers have <strong>in</strong>creased risk, particularly those under 25marital status – unmarried drivers are at a greater risk than married drivers, andtreatment – those not receiv<strong>in</strong>g anti-epileptic drug treatment are at greater risk than thosereceiv<strong>in</strong>g treatment.23.4 Effect of seizures and epilepsy on functional ability <strong>to</strong> driveThe primary consideration for drivers with epilepsy is the potential for a seizure caus<strong>in</strong>g asudden impairment of cognitive, mo<strong>to</strong>r or sensory functions, or a loss of consciousness whiledriv<strong>in</strong>g.15 Source: Data from Ontario Health Survey, Community Health Survey and National Population Health Survey(Wiebe S, Bellhouse D, Fallary C, Eliasziv M. Burden of epilepsy: the Ontario health survey. Can J Neurol Sci1999;26:263-70).302


ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessmentapproachPrimaryfunctionalabilityaffectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsSeizuresEpilepsyEpisodicimpairment:Medical assessment– likelihood ofimpairmentVariable –suddenimpairment<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s report23.5 CompensationAs seizures and epilepsy cause an episodic impairment of the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, an<strong>in</strong>dividual cannot compensate.GUIDELINES23.6 Policy rationaleThe general approach of the guidel<strong>in</strong>es for drivers with epilepsy or who experience seizures isthat seizures must be controlled as a prerequisite <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g.Most of the guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>clude a requirement for a seizure-free period. The purpose of thisrequirement for a provoked seizure is <strong>to</strong> establish the likelihood that the provok<strong>in</strong>g fac<strong>to</strong>r hasbeen successfully treated or stabilized. For an unprovoked seizure, the purpose is <strong>to</strong> allow time<strong>to</strong> assess the cause, and where epilepsy is diagnosed <strong>to</strong> establish the likelihood that a therapeutic drug level has been achieved and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed the drug be<strong>in</strong>g used will prevent further seizures, and there are no side effects that may affect the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s ability <strong>to</strong> drive safely.The guidel<strong>in</strong>es identify exceptions <strong>to</strong> the requirement <strong>to</strong> rema<strong>in</strong> seizure free for drivers of privatevehicles who have epilepsy and who have only simple partial seizures, or seizures that onlyoccur while they are asleep or immediately upon awaken<strong>in</strong>g.303


23.7 Private and commercial drivers with provoked seizures caused by astructural bra<strong>in</strong> abnormalityApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for private andcommercial drivers who have experienced provoked seizures caused by astructural bra<strong>in</strong> abnormality such as: a bra<strong>in</strong> tumour stroke subdural hema<strong>to</strong>ma, or aneurysm.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or a neurological assessment. The neurological assessment may beconducted by the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, if the physician has treated thepatient for two years or more. However, if a neurological assessmentby the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician does not provide the required <strong>in</strong>formation,OSMV may request an assessment from a neurologist.Individuals may drive if: they have undergone a neurological assessment <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e the causeof the seizure, and epilepsy is not diagnosed it has been 6 months s<strong>in</strong>ce the provok<strong>in</strong>g fac<strong>to</strong>r stabilized, resolved, orbeen corrected, with or without treatment, and they have not had aseizure dur<strong>in</strong>g that time they have been tak<strong>in</strong>g anti-epileptic medication for 3 months or havebeen off anti-epileptic medication for 3 months, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that further seizures are unlikely.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they have undergone a neurological assessment <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e the causeof the seizure, and epilepsy is not diagnosed it has been 6 months s<strong>in</strong>ce the provok<strong>in</strong>g fac<strong>to</strong>r stabilized, resolved, orbeen corrected, with or without treatment, and they have not had aseizure dur<strong>in</strong>g that time they have been tak<strong>in</strong>g anti-epileptic medication for 3 months or havebeen off anti-epileptic medication for 3 months, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that further seizures are unlikelyNo conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If the seizure occurred with<strong>in</strong> the past 12 months, OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong>one year. If no further seizures are reported at that time, or if the seizureoccurred more than one year ago, OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> five years. If nofurther seizures are reported at that time, no further re-assessment, otherthan rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-related re-assessment, is required.304


23.8 Private and commercial drivers with provoked seizures with no structuralbra<strong>in</strong> abnormalityApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for private andcommercial drivers who have experienced provoked seizures causedby: a <strong>to</strong>xic illness adverse drug reactiona trauma, orother cause that is not associated with a structural bra<strong>in</strong>abnormality.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or a neurological assessment. The neurological assessment may beconducted by the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, if the physician has treated thepatient for two years or more. However, if a neurologicalassessment by the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician does not provide the required<strong>in</strong>formation, OSMV may request an assessment from a neurologist.Individuals may drive if: they have undergone a neurological assessment <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e thecause of the seizure, and epilepsy is not diagnosed the provok<strong>in</strong>g fac<strong>to</strong>r has stabilized, resolved, or been corrected,with or without treatment, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that further seizures are unlikely.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they have undergone a neurological assessment <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e thecause of the seizure, and epilepsy is not diagnosed the provok<strong>in</strong>g fac<strong>to</strong>r has stabilized, resolved, or been corrected,with or without treatment, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that further seizures are unlikely.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.No re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-related reassessment,is required.305


23.9 Private and commercial drivers with alcohol-related provoked seizuresApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for private andcommercial drivers with alcohol-related provoked seizures.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request an assessmentfrom an addictions specialist or the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, if the treat<strong>in</strong>gphysician has treated the <strong>in</strong>dividual for more than two years.Individuals may drive if: the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician has confirmed that the cause of the seizurewas alcohol use they have undergone addiction treatment and have received afavourable report from an addiction counsellor, and it has been at least 6 months s<strong>in</strong>ce they have used alcohol or had aseizure.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician has confirmed that the cause of the seizurewas alcohol use they have undergone addiction treatment and have received afavourable report from an addiction counsellor, and it has been at least 6 months s<strong>in</strong>ce they have used alcohol or had aseizure.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must follow up regularly with your treat<strong>in</strong>g physician andcomply with any prescribed treatment regime, and you must cease driv<strong>in</strong>g and report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician ifyou have a seizureNo restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> one year. If no further seizures are reported atthat time, OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> five years. If no further seizures arereported at that time, no further re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>ecommercial or age-related re-assessment, is required.306


23.10 Private drivers with s<strong>in</strong>gle unprovoked seizuresApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have experienced a s<strong>in</strong>gle unprovoked seizure.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or a neurological assessment. The neurological assessment may beconducted by the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, if the physician has treated thepatient for two years or more. However, if a neurologicalassessment by the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician does not provide the required<strong>in</strong>formation, OSMV may request an assessment from aneurologist.Individuals may drive if: it has been at least 3 months s<strong>in</strong>ce the seizure occurred, and they have undergone a neurological assessment <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e thecause of the seizure, and epilepsy is not diagnosed. Neurologicalassessment means an assessment conducted by a neurologist orother medical specialist who has determ<strong>in</strong>ed, based on his<strong>to</strong>ry,physical exam<strong>in</strong>ation and appropriate diagnostic tests, thatepilepsy is not diagnosed.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least 3 months s<strong>in</strong>ce the seizure occurred, and they have undergone a neurological assessment <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e thecause of the seizure, and epilepsy is not diagnosed. Neurologicalassessment means an assessment conducted by a neurologist orother medical specialist who has determ<strong>in</strong>ed, based on his<strong>to</strong>ry,physical exam<strong>in</strong>ation and appropriate diagnostic tests, that epilepsyis not diagnosed.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.If the seizure occurred with<strong>in</strong> the past 12 months, OSMV will reassess<strong>in</strong> one year. If no further seizures are reported at that time, or ifthe seizure did not occur with<strong>in</strong> the past 12 months, OSMV will reassess<strong>in</strong> five years. If no further seizures are reported at that time, nofurther re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment, isrequired.307


23.11 Commercial drivers with s<strong>in</strong>gle unprovoked seizuresApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for commercialdrivers who have experienced a s<strong>in</strong>gle unprovoked seizure.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or a neurological assessment. The neurological assessment may beconducted by the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, if the physician has treated thepatient for two years or more. However, if a neurologicalassessment by the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician does not provide the required<strong>in</strong>formation, OSMV may request an assessment from aneurologist.Individuals may drive if: it has been at least 12 months s<strong>in</strong>ce the seizure occurred, and they have undergone a neurological assessment <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e thecause of the seizure, and epilepsy is not diagnosed. Neurologicalassessment means an assessment conducted by a neurologist orother medical specialist who has determ<strong>in</strong>ed, based on his<strong>to</strong>ry,physical exam<strong>in</strong>ation and appropriate diagnostic tests, thatepilepsy is not diagnosed.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been at least 12 months s<strong>in</strong>ce the seizure occurred, and they have undergone a neurological assessment <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e thecause of the seizure, and epilepsy is not diagnosed. Neurologicalassessment means an assessment conducted by a neurologist orother medical specialist who has determ<strong>in</strong>ed, based on his<strong>to</strong>ry,physical exam<strong>in</strong>ation and appropriate diagnostic tests, that epilepsyis not diagnosed.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> one year. If no further seizures are reported atthat time, OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> accordance with rout<strong>in</strong>e commercialre-assessment.308


23.12 Private drivers with epilepsyApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have been diagnosed with epilepsy, with the follow<strong>in</strong>gexceptions: If the epileptic seizures only occur while the driver is asleep, orimmediately after awaken<strong>in</strong>g, the guidel<strong>in</strong>es under 23.13 apply. If the driver only experiences simple partial seizures, theguidel<strong>in</strong>es under 23.14 apply. If the driver has had surgery for epilepsy, the guidel<strong>in</strong>es under23.15 apply. If the driver has changed effective medication, the guidel<strong>in</strong>es under23.16 apply.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a neurologist.Individuals may drive if: they have been tak<strong>in</strong>g anti-epileptic medication for 6 months, or alonger period where recommended by their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, andhave not had a seizure dur<strong>in</strong>g that time, and they rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their treatment regime and physician’s adviceregard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of seizures.OSMV will f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they have been tak<strong>in</strong>g anti-epileptic medication for 6 months, or alonger period where recommended by their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, andhave not had a seizure dur<strong>in</strong>g that time, and they rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their treatment regime and physician’s adviceregard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of seizures.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow your treatment regime and physician’sadvice regard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of seizures, and you must cease driv<strong>in</strong>g and report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician ifyou have a seizureNo restrictions are required.If a seizure occurred with<strong>in</strong> the past 12 months, OSMV will re-assess<strong>in</strong> one year. If no further seizures are reported at that time, or if aseizure did not occur with<strong>in</strong> the past 12 months, no re-assessment,other than rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment, is required.309


23.13 Private drivers who have epileptic seizures while asleep or upon awaken<strong>in</strong>gApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have epileptic seizures only while the driver is asleep, orimmediately after awaken<strong>in</strong>g.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a neurologist.Individuals may drive if: the seizure pattern has been consistent for at least 5 years, unless aneurologist recommends a shorter period accompanied by closeobservation by the neurologist where they are treated, they rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their treatment regimeand physician’s advice regard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of seizures, and they rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their physician’s advice regard<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>uedmoni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g of their seizures.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the seizure pattern has been consistent for at least 5 years, unless aneurologist recommends a shorter period accompanied by closeobservation by the neurologist where they are treated, they rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their treatment regimeand physician’s advice regard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of seizures, and they rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their physician’s advice regard<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>uedmoni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g of their seizures.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow your treatment regime and physician’sadvice regard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of seizures you must rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow your physician’s advice regard<strong>in</strong>gcont<strong>in</strong>ued moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g of your seizures. you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician if the pattern of yourseizures changesNo restrictions are required.No re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment, isrequired.310


23.14 Private drivers with epilepsy who experience simple partial seizuresApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers with epilepsy who only experience simple partial seizures (noimpairment <strong>in</strong> level of consciousness), the symp<strong>to</strong>ms of which do notimpair their functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a neurologist.Individuals may drive if: the symp<strong>to</strong>ms of the seizures are unchanged for at least 1 year where they are treated, they rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their treatment regimeand physician’s advice regard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of seizures, and they have the support of a neurologist <strong>to</strong> drive.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the symp<strong>to</strong>ms of the seizures are unchanged for at least 1 year where they are treated, they rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their treatment regimeand physician’s advice regard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of seizures, and they have the support of a neurologist <strong>to</strong> drive.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow your treatment regime and physician’sadvice regard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of seizures you must report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician if the symp<strong>to</strong>ms ofyour seizures changeNo restrictions are required.No re-assessment is required, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related reassessment.311


23.15 Private drivers who have had surgery for epilepsyApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have had surgery for epilepsy.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a neurologist.Individuals may drive if: they have not had a seizure for 6 months they rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their treatment regime and physician’s adviceregard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of seizures, and where they have a subsequent seizure, they s<strong>to</strong>p driv<strong>in</strong>g for at least6 months or a longer period where recommended by their treat<strong>in</strong>gphysician and do not have a seizure dur<strong>in</strong>g that time.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they have not had a seizure for 6 months they rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their treatment regime and physician’s adviceregard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of seizures, and where they have a subsequent seizure, they s<strong>to</strong>p driv<strong>in</strong>g for at least6 months or a longer period where recommended by their treat<strong>in</strong>gphysician and do not have a seizure dur<strong>in</strong>g that time.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow your treatment regime and physician’sadvice regard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of seizures, and you must cease driv<strong>in</strong>g and report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician ifyou have a seizureNo restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> five years. If no seizures are reported at thattime, no further re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related reassessment,is required.312


23.16 Private drivers with epilepsy who change medicationApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers with epilepsy who undergo a prescribed change <strong>to</strong> orwithdrawal of an effective antiepileptic medication. These guidel<strong>in</strong>esonly apply where the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s treatment was effective (i.e., theirepilepsy was controlled) prior <strong>to</strong> the change <strong>to</strong> or withdrawal frommedication. This means they should not have had a seizure for at leastsix months prior <strong>to</strong> the change or withdrawal of medication. If theirtreatment prior <strong>to</strong> the change was not effective, then the guidel<strong>in</strong>es forprivate drivers with epilepsy outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 23.12 apply.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a neurologist.Individuals may drive if it has been 3 months s<strong>in</strong>ce the change orwithdrawal and they have not had a seizure dur<strong>in</strong>g that time.Individuals who have a seizure after a change <strong>to</strong>, or withdrawal from,epileptic medication may be found fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they re-establish a previously effective treatment regime, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that further seizures are unlikely.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been 3 months s<strong>in</strong>ce the change or withdrawal and they havenot had a seizure dur<strong>in</strong>g that time.Individuals who have a seizure after a change <strong>to</strong>, or withdrawal from,epileptic medication may be found fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they re-establish a previously effective treatment regime, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that further seizures are unlikelyOSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow your treatment regime and physician’sadvice regard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of seizures, and you must cease driv<strong>in</strong>g and report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician ifyou have a seizure.No restrictions are required.If a seizure occurred with<strong>in</strong> the past 12 months, OSMV will re-assess<strong>in</strong> one year. If no further seizures are reported at that time, or if aseizure did not occur with<strong>in</strong> the past 12 months, OSMV will re-assess<strong>in</strong> five years. If no further seizures are reported at that time, no furtherre-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e age-related re-assessment, isrequired.313


23.17 Commercial drivers with epilepsyApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for commercialdrivers who have been diagnosed with epilepsy. This <strong>in</strong>cludescommercial drivers: who have had surgery for epilepsy whose seizures only occur while they are asleep or immediatelyafter awaken<strong>in</strong>g, and.who have only simple partial seizures (no impairment <strong>in</strong> level ofconsciousness), the symp<strong>to</strong>ms of which do not impair theirfunctional ability <strong>to</strong> drive .See 23.18 for guidel<strong>in</strong>es applicable <strong>to</strong> commercial drivers who meetthese guidel<strong>in</strong>es and then change medication.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a neurologist.Individuals may drive if: they have been tak<strong>in</strong>g anti-epileptic medication cont<strong>in</strong>uously for 5years and have not had a seizure dur<strong>in</strong>g that time, or they have nottaken anti-epileptic medication for 5 cont<strong>in</strong>uous years and have nothad a seizure dur<strong>in</strong>g that time, and they rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their treatment regime and physician’s adviceregard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of seizures.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they have been tak<strong>in</strong>g antiepileptic medication cont<strong>in</strong>uously for 5years and have not had a seizure dur<strong>in</strong>g that time, or they have not taken antiepileptic medication for 5 cont<strong>in</strong>uous yearsand have not had a seizure dur<strong>in</strong>g that time, and they rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow their treatment regime and physician’s adviceregard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of seizures.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow your treatment regime and physician’sadvice regard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of seizures, and you must cease driv<strong>in</strong>g and report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician ifyou have a seizure.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> accordance with the schedule for rout<strong>in</strong>ecommercial re-assessment.314


23.18 Commercial drivers with epilepsy who change medicationApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for commercialdrivers with epilepsy who have a prescribed change <strong>to</strong>, or withdrawalof, an effective antiepileptic medication. These guidel<strong>in</strong>es only applywhere the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s treatment was effective (i.e., their epilepsy wascontrolled) prior <strong>to</strong> the change <strong>to</strong> or withdrawal from medication. Thismeans they must first meet the regular guidel<strong>in</strong>es for drivers withepilepsy before this guidel<strong>in</strong>e will apply.If further <strong>in</strong>formation is required, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a neurologist.Individuals may drive if it has been 5 years s<strong>in</strong>ce the change orwithdrawal and they have not had a seizure dur<strong>in</strong>g that time.Individuals who meet the guidel<strong>in</strong>e above but subsequently have aseizure may drive if: they have re-established a previously effective treatment regimefor 6 months and they have not had a seizure dur<strong>in</strong>g that time, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that further seizures are unlikely.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: it has been 5 years s<strong>in</strong>ce the change or withdrawal and they havenot had a seizure dur<strong>in</strong>g that timeIndividuals who meet the guidel<strong>in</strong>e above but subsequently have aseizure may drive if: they have re-established a previously effective treatment regime for6 months and they have not had a seizure dur<strong>in</strong>g that time, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that further seizures are unlikely.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow your treatment regime and physician’sadvice regard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of seizures, and you must cease driv<strong>in</strong>g and report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician ifyou have a seizure.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess <strong>in</strong> accordance with the schedule for rout<strong>in</strong>ecommercial re-assessment.315


Chapter 24: Neurological disordersBACKGROUND24.1 About neurological disordersNeurological disorders can affect the bra<strong>in</strong>, sp<strong>in</strong>al cord, nerves and muscles. They can affect an<strong>in</strong>dividual’s ability <strong>to</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k, see, communicate, move, and sense and coord<strong>in</strong>ate movements.While any number of conditions fall with<strong>in</strong> the category of neurological disorders, this chapterfocuses on three common disorders: multiple sclerosis, Park<strong>in</strong>son’s disease, and cerebral palsy.Multiple sclerosisMultiple sclerosis (MS) is believed <strong>to</strong> be an au<strong>to</strong>immune disorder <strong>in</strong> which the immune systemattacks specific structures of the central nervous system (bra<strong>in</strong> and sp<strong>in</strong>al cord), result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>flammation, demyel<strong>in</strong>ation, and axonal damage. Myel<strong>in</strong> is an essential <strong>in</strong>sulation sheath of thenerve processes (axons). If it is damaged, signal transmission is slowed. Demyel<strong>in</strong>ation canultimately result <strong>in</strong> permanent axonal damage <strong>in</strong> the form of scars and is called gliosis.MS has an unpredictable and chronic course, lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> numerous physical and cognitiveimpairments. The cause is unknown. There are four cl<strong>in</strong>ical types of MS: Relaps<strong>in</strong>g – Remitt<strong>in</strong>g (RRMS) Secondary Progressive (SPMS) Primary Progressive (PPMS), and Progressive Relaps<strong>in</strong>g (PRMS).Relaps<strong>in</strong>g – Remitt<strong>in</strong>g (RRMS)It is estimated that 55% of <strong>in</strong>dividuals with MS have RRMS. It is characterized by unpredictableattacks (relapses) followed by periods of months <strong>to</strong> years with no new cl<strong>in</strong>ical signs of diseaseactivity (remissions). Impairments suffered dur<strong>in</strong>g relapses may either resolve or becomepermanent. Approximately 10% of those with RRMS have “benign MS”, where impairmentsusually completely resolve between relapses and no disability is present after 10 years of diseaseonset. The longer a person has MS, the greater the probability that the relapses will notcompletely resolve and they will experience <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g disability.RRMS accounts for over 90% of <strong>in</strong>itial diagnoses of MS, but <strong>in</strong> many cases a different typeemerges as the disease progresses. Approximately 50% of <strong>in</strong>dividuals with RRMS willeventually progress <strong>to</strong> Secondary Progressive MS with<strong>in</strong> 10 years of disease onset.Secondary Progressive (SPMS)It is estimated that 30% of <strong>in</strong>dividuals with MS have SPMS. It is characterized by an <strong>in</strong>itialpresentation as RRMS, transition<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> a gradual progression of disability with or withoutsuperimposed relapses and m<strong>in</strong>or remissions. Relapses may <strong>in</strong>clude new neurologic symp<strong>to</strong>ms316


Level of disabilityor worsen<strong>in</strong>g of exist<strong>in</strong>g symp<strong>to</strong>ms. Of all the types of MS, SPMS causes the greatest amount ofdisability.Primary Progressive (PPMS)It is estimated that 10% of <strong>in</strong>dividuals with MS have PPMS. It is characterized by a gradualprogression of disability with no relapses and m<strong>in</strong>or remissions from onset. The sp<strong>in</strong>al cord isthe area of the central nervous system primarily affected; therefore, cognitive impairments areunusual.Progressive Relaps<strong>in</strong>g (PRMS)It is estimated that 3 <strong>to</strong>5% of <strong>in</strong>dividuals with MS have PRMS. PRMS is characterized by asteady progression of disability with superimposed relapses and remissions. There may besignificant recovery immediately follow<strong>in</strong>g a relapse, but between relapses there is a gradualworsen<strong>in</strong>g of symp<strong>to</strong>ms.The follow<strong>in</strong>g illustration compares the course of disability over time for each of the four typesof MS. 16Relaps<strong>in</strong>g –Remitt<strong>in</strong>g (RRMS)Secondary Progressive(SPMS)Primary Progressive(PPMS)Progressive Relaps<strong>in</strong>g(PRMS)TimePark<strong>in</strong>son’s diseasePark<strong>in</strong>son’s disease (PD) belongs <strong>to</strong> a group of conditions called mo<strong>to</strong>r system or movementdisorders, which result from the slowly progressive loss of dopam<strong>in</strong>e-produc<strong>in</strong>g bra<strong>in</strong> cells. Thelack of dopam<strong>in</strong>e, a neurotransmitter, <strong>in</strong>terferes with the transmission of messages from the bra<strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> nerve cells that control muscle movement and coord<strong>in</strong>ation. It can result <strong>in</strong> mo<strong>to</strong>r impairment(tremor or rigidity) and <strong>in</strong> later stages <strong>in</strong> cognitive or au<strong>to</strong>nomic dysfunction. PD is chronic and16 Source: The Multiple Sclerosis Information Trust, http://www.mult-sclerosis.org.317


progressive, and while the specific cause is unknown, it is believed that both genetic andenvironmental fac<strong>to</strong>rs contribute <strong>to</strong> the development of the disease.Cerebral palsyCerebral palsy refers <strong>to</strong> any one of a number of neurological disorders that appear <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fancy orearly childhood and is the result of damage <strong>to</strong>, or impaired development of, the mo<strong>to</strong>r centres ofthe bra<strong>in</strong>. It is a non-progressive disorder that permanently affects body movement and musclecoord<strong>in</strong>ation.24.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of neurological disordersMultiple sclerosisThe prevalence of MS <strong>in</strong> Canada is among the highest <strong>in</strong> the world, with studies report<strong>in</strong>gprevalence rates from 55 <strong>to</strong> 240 per 100,000. A recent study us<strong>in</strong>g data from the 2001 CanadianCommunity Health Survey reported an overall weighted estimate of 240 per 100,000 adults(0.24%). 17MS is twice as likely <strong>to</strong> affect women as men, with the highest <strong>in</strong>cidence occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals<strong>in</strong> their late 30’s, and the highest prevalence among those <strong>in</strong> their 40’s and 50’s.Park<strong>in</strong>son’s diseaseEstimated prevalence rates for Park<strong>in</strong>son’s disease vary widely depend<strong>in</strong>g on the populationsampled and the methodology used. Age-adjusted prevalence rates <strong>in</strong> Canada have beenreported as 125 per 100,000 (1.25%).Cerebral palsyThe prevalence of cerebral palsy (CP) <strong>in</strong> Canadian <strong>in</strong>fants is approximately 2 <strong>in</strong> 1000, with over50,000 Canadians currently liv<strong>in</strong>g with the disorder. The number of <strong>in</strong>dividuals with CP hasrisen slightly over the past 30 years due <strong>to</strong> higher survival rates of affected newborns as care andtreatment have improved.24.3 Neurological disorders and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesMultiple sclerosisThe research on MS and driv<strong>in</strong>g is limited. The results of this research <strong>in</strong>dicate that driv<strong>in</strong>gperformance may be impaired by functional deficits, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cognitive impairment, caused byMS.17 Weighted estimate means that the results from the data are adjusted (weighted) from the sampl<strong>in</strong>g design us<strong>in</strong>gnational population data.318


Park<strong>in</strong>son’s diseaseThere is a small but consistent body of research <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that functional deficits associated withPark<strong>in</strong>son’s disease or its treatment may impair driv<strong>in</strong>g performance.Cerebral palsyThere has been no research on the effects of cerebral palsy and driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes.24.4 Effect of neurological disorders on functional ability <strong>to</strong> driveMultiple sclerosisMS can affect mo<strong>to</strong>r, visual, and cognitive function<strong>in</strong>g. The major symp<strong>to</strong>ms associated withMS that may affect driv<strong>in</strong>g are: ataxia (wobbl<strong>in</strong>ess, <strong>in</strong>coord<strong>in</strong>ation and unstead<strong>in</strong>ess) impaired proprioception (ability <strong>to</strong> perceive the body’s position <strong>in</strong> space) spasticity (<strong>in</strong>voluntary muscle spasms) muscle weakness fatigue chronic pa<strong>in</strong> vision problems, and cognitive impairment.Vision problems are common, affect<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>to</strong> 80% of <strong>in</strong>dividuals with MS at some po<strong>in</strong>t. Visualsymp<strong>to</strong>ms associated with MS <strong>in</strong>clude: nystagmus (rapid, <strong>in</strong>voluntary eye movement) diplopia (double vision) blurred vision sco<strong>to</strong>ma (abnormal bl<strong>in</strong>d spot), and dim<strong>in</strong>ished contrast sensitivity.Cognitive impairment, particularly associated with <strong>in</strong>formation process<strong>in</strong>g speed, is alsocommon, affect<strong>in</strong>g between 45 and 65% of those with the disease.Medications used <strong>to</strong> treat MS that may affect driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clude: corticosteroids NSAIDS anti-epileptics anti-depressants anti-spasticity drugs, and opioids.See Chapter 29, Psychotropic Drugs, for more <strong>in</strong>formation on these medications.319


Park<strong>in</strong>son’s diseasePD can affect mo<strong>to</strong>r, visual, and cognitive function<strong>in</strong>g. Common mo<strong>to</strong>r symp<strong>to</strong>ms <strong>in</strong>clude: tremor rigidity bradyk<strong>in</strong>esia/ak<strong>in</strong>esia (slowness or absence of movement/rapid repetitive movements), and postural <strong>in</strong>stability.Visual impairments such as contrast sensitivity, diplopia (double-vision) and impaired eyemovement are sometimes seen <strong>in</strong> PD and related movement disorders. Cognitive symp<strong>to</strong>ms may<strong>in</strong>clude psychiatric conditions such as depression, impulse control disorders, and psychosis, aswell as sleep disturbances, psychomo<strong>to</strong>r slow<strong>in</strong>g (slow response and reaction time), cognitiveimpairment and dementia.In addition <strong>to</strong> the symp<strong>to</strong>ms noted above, fatigue and sleep disturbances are common <strong>in</strong> thosewith PD.The symp<strong>to</strong>ms of PD are often treated with medications <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g levodopa, dopam<strong>in</strong>e agonists,and MAO-B <strong>in</strong>hibi<strong>to</strong>rs. These medications can cause side effects <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sleep<strong>in</strong>ess, sleepattacks (sudden, overwhelm<strong>in</strong>g sleep<strong>in</strong>ess with little or no warn<strong>in</strong>g signs) and visualhalluc<strong>in</strong>ations, which may affect driv<strong>in</strong>g.A further consideration for driv<strong>in</strong>g is the fluctuation <strong>in</strong> the effects of medication. Individualswith advanced PD may experience periods of reduced symp<strong>to</strong>m control (wear<strong>in</strong>g off) near thetime of their next dose of medication.Cerebral palsyCP can affect mo<strong>to</strong>r, visual, and cognitive function<strong>in</strong>g. The primary effects of CP are: ataxia (wobbl<strong>in</strong>ess, <strong>in</strong>coord<strong>in</strong>ation and unstead<strong>in</strong>ess) weakness and spasticity (<strong>in</strong>voluntary muscle spasms), and altered muscle <strong>to</strong>ne that is either <strong>to</strong>o stiff or <strong>to</strong>o floppy.CP can also cause a loss of visual acuity or slowed visual track<strong>in</strong>g, as well as cognitiveimpairments such as impaired judgment and slow process<strong>in</strong>g or reaction times.320


ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessmentapproachPrimaryfunctionalabilityaffectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsMultiple sclerosisPark<strong>in</strong>son’s diseaseCerebral palsyPersistentimpairment:FunctionalassessmentVariable –cognitive,mo<strong>to</strong>r orsensory<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s reportIC<strong>BC</strong> road testCognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>olssuch as; MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD, Trails Aor B<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessmentFunctional assessment byan occupational therapis<strong>to</strong>r driver rehabilitationspecialist24.5 CompensationIndividuals who have experienced a persistent impairment of mo<strong>to</strong>r or sensory function may beable <strong>to</strong> compensate. An occupational therapist, driver rehabilitation specialist, driver exam<strong>in</strong>eror other medical professional may recommend specific compensa<strong>to</strong>ry vehicle modifications orrestrictions based on an <strong>in</strong>dividual functional assessment.Some examples of compensa<strong>to</strong>ry mechanisms are shown <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g table.Mo<strong>to</strong>r impairment Steer<strong>in</strong>g wheel sp<strong>in</strong>ner knob Restriction <strong>to</strong> au<strong>to</strong>matic transmission orpower-assisted brakesSensory (vision) impairment Scann<strong>in</strong>g horizon more frequently Turn<strong>in</strong>g head 90◦ <strong>to</strong> maximize areascanned Large left and right side mirrors321


GUIDELINES24.6 Private and commercial drivers with a neurological disorderApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have: multiple sclerosis Park<strong>in</strong>son’s disease cerebral palsy, or other neurological disorders.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a neurologist.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates possible impairment of one or moreof the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMV will request functionalassessment(s) as appropriate for the type(s) of impairment and classof licence held, unless there has been no significant change <strong>in</strong> the<strong>in</strong>dividual’s condition or functional ability s<strong>in</strong>ce a previous functionalassessment.Individuals may drive if: they reta<strong>in</strong> sufficient range of motion, strength and coord<strong>in</strong>ation<strong>to</strong> perform the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g vehicles <strong>in</strong> theirlicence class they have sufficient cognitive function <strong>to</strong> drive safely any pa<strong>in</strong> associated with the condition, or the drugs used <strong>to</strong> treatthe condition, does not adversely affect their ability <strong>to</strong> drivesafely where required, a road test or other functional assessment<strong>in</strong>dicates that they are able <strong>to</strong> compensate for any loss offunctional ability required for driv<strong>in</strong>g, and where permitted, they only drive with any vehicle modificationsand devices required <strong>to</strong> compensate for their functionalimpairment.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician does not <strong>in</strong>dicate possible impairment ofthe functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, or where the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that there may beimpairment of the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, a functionalassessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have the functional ability requiredfor their class of licence held.322


ConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleNo conditions are required.OSMV will restrict an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s licence so that they only drivewith any permitted vehicle modifications and devices required <strong>to</strong>compensate for their functional impairment. This may <strong>in</strong>clude one ormore of the follow<strong>in</strong>g restrictions:26 Specified vehicle modifications required28 Restricted <strong>to</strong> au<strong>to</strong>matic transmission51 [specify type of restriction]If the neurological disorder is progressive (e.g., multiple sclerosis orPark<strong>in</strong>son’s disease), OSMV will re-assess every 5 years or <strong>in</strong>accordance with rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-related re-assessment,unless a shorter re-assessment <strong>in</strong>terval is recommended by thetreat<strong>in</strong>g physician.If the neurological disorder is not progressive (e.g., cerebral palsy),no re-assessment is required, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or agerelatedre-assessment.The potential functional impairments associated with neurologicaldisorders are variable.323


Chapter 25: Traumatic Bra<strong>in</strong> InjuryBACKGROUND25.1 About traumatic bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>juryTraumatic bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>jury (TBI) is a nondegenerative, noncongenital <strong>in</strong>sult <strong>to</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong> from anexternal mechanical force, possibly lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> permanent or temporary impairment of cognitive,physical, and psychosocial functions, with an associated dim<strong>in</strong>ished or altered state ofconsciousness. The lead<strong>in</strong>g causes of TBI are falls and mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle crashes.Descriptions of the severity of a TBI reflect the length of time a person is unconscious or lacksawareness of their environment. Mild TBI <strong>in</strong>dicates only a brief change <strong>in</strong> mental status orconsciousness, while severe TBI describes an extended period of unconsciousness or amnesiaafter the <strong>in</strong>jury.TBI can result <strong>in</strong> a wide range of impairments, which will vary depend<strong>in</strong>g on the severity andlocation of the <strong>in</strong>jury, and the age and general health of the <strong>in</strong>jured person. Possible sensoryimpairments <strong>in</strong>clude: visual field deficits visual neglect diplopia, and loss of sensation or hear<strong>in</strong>g.Possible mo<strong>to</strong>r impairments <strong>in</strong>clude paralysis, paresis (partial loss of movement or impairedmovement) and slowed reaction times. Cognitive impairments <strong>in</strong>clude impaired: attention memory executive function<strong>in</strong>g process<strong>in</strong>g speed, and visuo-spatial abilities, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g visual memory.Behavioural impairments are common <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g disorders affect<strong>in</strong>g mood and impulse control.Sleep disturbances, sleep apnea and fatigue are also commonly reported. TBI is also associatedwith epilepsy.Anosognosia (unawareness of impairment) is common <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals with TBI, particularly <strong>in</strong>those with moderate <strong>to</strong> severe TBI, and is of particular concern for driv<strong>in</strong>g. Research suggeststhat anosognosia is more frequently associated with cognitive and behavioural impairments thanwith physical deficits.324


25.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of traumatic bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>juryRates of <strong>in</strong>cidence and prevalence of TBI are difficult <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e due <strong>to</strong> a lack of uniformity <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>itions and report<strong>in</strong>g methods. Canadian data suggest that the overall prevalence of TBI is62.3 per 100,000 adults. Rates were highest <strong>in</strong> the 45 <strong>to</strong> 64 year old age range, three times therate of those <strong>in</strong> the 15 <strong>to</strong> 24 year old range.25.3 Traumatic bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>jury and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesNumerous studies have exam<strong>in</strong>ed the relationship between TBI and driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes. Althoughfew studies have exam<strong>in</strong>ed crash rates, the exist<strong>in</strong>g research <strong>in</strong>dicates higher rates of crashes andtraffic violations for those who have experienced a TBI. Notably, studies <strong>in</strong>dicate thatapproximately 50% of those experienc<strong>in</strong>g a TBI will not resume driv<strong>in</strong>g after the TBI. Researchexam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g road test results <strong>in</strong>dicates that approximately 30% of <strong>in</strong>dividuals who haveexperienced a TBI will fail a subsequent road test.25.4 Effect of traumatic bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>jury on functional ability <strong>to</strong> driveTraumatic bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>jury may result <strong>in</strong> a persistent cognitive, mo<strong>to</strong>r, or sensory impairment, or anepisodic impairment (epilepsy), or both.ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessmentapproachPrimaryfunctionalabilityaffectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsTraumatic bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>juryPersistentimpairment:FunctionalassessmentVariable –cognitive, mo<strong>to</strong>ror sensory<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s reportIC<strong>BC</strong> road testCognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>olssuch as; MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD, Trails A orB<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessmentFunctional assessment byan occupational therapist ordriver rehabilitationspecialistEpisodic impairment:Medical assessment –likelihood ofimpairmentVariable –suddenimpairment(epilepsy)<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s report325


25.5 CompensationIndividuals who have experienced a persistent impairment of mo<strong>to</strong>r or sensory function may beable <strong>to</strong> compensate. An occupational therapist, driver rehabilitation specialist, driver exam<strong>in</strong>eror other medical professional may recommend specific compensa<strong>to</strong>ry vehicle modifications orrestrictions based on an <strong>in</strong>dividual functional assessment.Some examples of compensa<strong>to</strong>ry mechanisms are shown <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g table.Mo<strong>to</strong>r impairment Steer<strong>in</strong>g wheel sp<strong>in</strong>ner knob Restriction <strong>to</strong> au<strong>to</strong>matic transmission orpower-assisted brakesSensory (vision) impairment Scann<strong>in</strong>g horizon more frequently Turn<strong>in</strong>g head 90◦ <strong>to</strong> maximize areascanned Large left and right side mirrors326


GUIDELINES25.6 Private and commercial drivers with a traumatic bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>juryApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have suffered a traumatic bra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>jury(TBI).If the driver has epilepsy as a result of the TBI, also see theguidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> Chapter 23.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a specialist.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates possible impairment of one or moreof the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMV will request functionalassessment(s) as appropriate for the type(s) of impairment and classof licence held, unless there has been no significant change <strong>in</strong> the<strong>in</strong>dividual’s condition or functional ability s<strong>in</strong>ce a previous functionalassessment.Individuals may drive if: they reta<strong>in</strong> sufficient movement and strength <strong>to</strong> perform thefunctions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g vehicles <strong>in</strong> their licence class they have sufficient cognitive and visual function <strong>to</strong> drive safely any pa<strong>in</strong> associated with their condition or treatment for theircondition does not adversely affect their ability <strong>to</strong> drive safely where required, a road test or other functional assessment<strong>in</strong>dicates that they are able <strong>to</strong> compensate for any loss offunctional ability required for driv<strong>in</strong>g, and where permitted, they only drive with any vehicle modificationsand devices required <strong>to</strong> compensate for their functionalimpairment.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician does not <strong>in</strong>dicate possible impairment ofthe functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, or where the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that there may beimpairment of the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, a functionalassessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have the functional ability requiredfor their class of licence held.No conditions are required.327


RestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleOSMV will restrict an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s licence so that they only drivewith any permitted vehicle modifications and devices required <strong>to</strong>compensate for their functional impairment. This may <strong>in</strong>clude one ormore of the follow<strong>in</strong>g restrictions:26 Specified vehicle modifications required28 Restricted <strong>to</strong> au<strong>to</strong>matic transmission51 [specify type of restriction]No re-assessment is required, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or agerelatedre-assessment.The potential functional impairments associated with traumatic bra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>jury are variable.328


Chapter 26: Intracranial TumoursBACKGROUND26.1 About <strong>in</strong>tracranial tumoursIntracranial tumours are tumours that develop <strong>in</strong>side the cranium, the upper portion of the skullthat protects the bra<strong>in</strong>. Primary tumours are those which orig<strong>in</strong>ate from with<strong>in</strong> the cranium andmetastatic tumours are those which result from cancers which spread (metastasize) from otherparts of the body. Metastatic tumours are by far the more common type of <strong>in</strong>tracranial tumour <strong>in</strong>adults, 10 times more common than primary tumours.Primary tumours may be classified as either benign (non-cancerous) or malignant (cancerous).Malignant tumours are graded on a scale of 1 <strong>to</strong> 4, with grade 4 be<strong>in</strong>g the most severe, based onhow abnormal they are compared <strong>to</strong> normal tissue and how quickly they are likely <strong>to</strong> grow andmetastasize.Typically, the treatment options for <strong>in</strong>tracranial tumours are surgery, radiation andchemotherapy, alone or <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation, regardless of whether the tumour is primary ormetastatic, benign or malignant. For primary tumours, the probability of successful treatmentdepends on a number of fac<strong>to</strong>rs, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the type of tumour, the size and the location.Treatment will rarely cure a metastatic tumour, and the goal of treatment is generally <strong>to</strong> reducesymp<strong>to</strong>ms, <strong>in</strong>crease length of survival, and improve quality of life.Impairments associated with <strong>in</strong>tracranial tumours vary depend<strong>in</strong>g on the type, location and rateof growth of the tumour and can affect cognitive, mo<strong>to</strong>r, or sensory functions. Possibleimpairments <strong>in</strong>clude: cognitive impairment epilepsy personality changes focal weakness, and sensory disturbances.The presentation of impairments may be progressive or variable.26.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of <strong>in</strong>tracranial tumoursThe overall <strong>in</strong>cidence of <strong>in</strong>tracranial tumours <strong>in</strong> the United States is between 5 and 14 per100,000 people (all ages), with the peak <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>in</strong> those between 65 and 79 years of age.Canadian data are lack<strong>in</strong>g.329


26.3 Intracranial tumours and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesNo studies on the effects of <strong>in</strong>tracranial tumours and driv<strong>in</strong>g were found.26.4 Effect of <strong>in</strong>tracranial tumours on functional ability <strong>to</strong> driveAn <strong>in</strong>tracranial tumour may result <strong>in</strong> a persistent cognitive, mo<strong>to</strong>r, or sensory impairment, or anepisodic impairment (epilepsy) or both.ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessmentapproachPrimaryfunctionalabilityaffectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsIntracranial tumoursPersistentimpairment:FunctionalassessmentVariable –cognitive,mo<strong>to</strong>r orsensory<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s reportIC<strong>BC</strong> road testCognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>olssuch as; MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD, Trails Aor B<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessmentFunctional assessment byan occupational therapis<strong>to</strong>r driver rehabilitationspecialistEpisodicimpairment:Medical assessment– likelihood ofimpairmentVariable –suddenimpairment(epilepsy)<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s report26.5 CompensationIndividuals who have experienced a persistent impairment of mo<strong>to</strong>r or sensory function may beable <strong>to</strong> compensate. An occupational therapist, driver rehabilitation specialist, driver exam<strong>in</strong>eror other medical professional may recommend specific compensa<strong>to</strong>ry vehicle modifications orrestrictions based on an <strong>in</strong>dividual functional assessment.330


Some examples of compensa<strong>to</strong>ry mechanisms are shown <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g table.Mo<strong>to</strong>r impairment Steer<strong>in</strong>g wheel sp<strong>in</strong>ner knob Restriction <strong>to</strong> au<strong>to</strong>matic transmission orpower-assisted brakesSensory (vision) impairment Scann<strong>in</strong>g horizon more frequently Turn<strong>in</strong>g head 90◦ <strong>to</strong> maximize areascanned Large left and right side mirrors331


GUIDELINES26.6 Private and commercial drivers with an <strong>in</strong>tracranial tumourApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have an <strong>in</strong>tracranial tumour.If the driver has epilepsy as a result of the tumour, also see theguidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> Chapter 23.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a specialist.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates possible impairment of one or moreof the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMV will request functionalassessment(s) as appropriate for the type(s) of impairment and classof licence held, unless there has been no significant change <strong>in</strong> the<strong>in</strong>dividual’s condition or functional ability s<strong>in</strong>ce a previous functionalassessment.Individuals may drive if: they reta<strong>in</strong> sufficient movement and strength <strong>to</strong> perform thefunctions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g vehicles <strong>in</strong> their licence class they have sufficient cognitive and visual function <strong>to</strong> drive safely the treatment of their condition or pa<strong>in</strong> associated with theircondition does not adversely affect their ability <strong>to</strong> drive safely where required, a road test or other functional assessment<strong>in</strong>dicates that they are able <strong>to</strong> compensate for any loss offunctional ability required for driv<strong>in</strong>g, and where permitted, they only drive with any vehicle modificationsand devices required <strong>to</strong> compensate for their functionalimpairment.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician does not <strong>in</strong>dicate possible impairment ofthe functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, or where the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that there may beimpairment of the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, a functionalassessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have the functional ability requiredfor their class of licence held.No conditions are required.OSMV will restrict an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s licence so that they only drivewith any permitted vehicle modifications and devices required <strong>to</strong>332


Re-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationalecompensate for their functional impairment. This may <strong>in</strong>clude one ormore of the follow<strong>in</strong>g restrictions:26 Specified vehicle modifications required28 Restricted <strong>to</strong> au<strong>to</strong>matic transmission51 [specify type of restriction]OSMV will re-assess every 5 years or <strong>in</strong> accordance with rout<strong>in</strong>ecommercial or age-related re-assessment, unless a shorter reassessment<strong>in</strong>terval is recommended by the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician. Nofurther re-assessment is required if the tumour is successfullyremoved.The potential functional impairments associated with an <strong>in</strong>tracranialtumour are variable.333


Chapter 27: Cognitive Impairment <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g DementiaBACKGROUND27.1 About cognitive impairment and dementiaCognitive impairment, also called cognitive dysfunction or neuropsychological impairment,refers <strong>to</strong> any impairment of a cognitive function such as: memory attention language problem solv<strong>in</strong>g, or judgment.Cognitive impairment may have any number of causes <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: bra<strong>in</strong> trauma anoxia (lack of oxygen <strong>to</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong>) <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>to</strong>xicities, or degenerative, metabolic, or nutritional diseases. 18The presentation of cognitive impairment is variable depend<strong>in</strong>g on the cognitive functionsaffected and the degree of impairment. Cognitive impairment may progress <strong>to</strong> dementia, it mayrema<strong>in</strong> stable, or there may be a recovery of normal cognitive function.DementiaDementia refers <strong>to</strong> a disorder characterized by memory impairment <strong>in</strong> conjunction with one ormore other cognitive deficits. In North America, the most commonly used criteria for thediagnosis of a dementia are those articulated by the American Psychiatric Association. Thedef<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g features of dementia are:A. The development of multiple cognitive deficits that <strong>in</strong>clude both(1) memory impairment (impaired ability <strong>to</strong> learn new <strong>in</strong>formation or <strong>to</strong> recallpreviously learned <strong>in</strong>formation)(2) one or more of the follow<strong>in</strong>g cognitive disturbances:18 Persistent cognitive impairment <strong>in</strong> association with other medical conditions is referenced <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>gchapters: Cardiovascular Diseases and Disorders, Cerebrovascular Disease, Intracranial Tumours, PsychotropicDrugs, Neurological Disorders, Psychiatric Disorders, Chronic Renal Disease, Respira<strong>to</strong>ry Diseases, SleepDisorders, Traumatic Bra<strong>in</strong> Injury, and Vestibular Disorders.334


i. aphasia (language disturbance)ii. apraxia (impaired ability <strong>to</strong> carry out mo<strong>to</strong>r activities despite <strong>in</strong>tact mo<strong>to</strong>rfunction)iii. agnosia (failure <strong>to</strong> recognize or identify objects despite <strong>in</strong>tact sensoryfunction, andiv. disturbance <strong>in</strong> executive function<strong>in</strong>g (e.g., plann<strong>in</strong>g, organiz<strong>in</strong>g,sequenc<strong>in</strong>g, abstract<strong>in</strong>g).B. The cognitive deficits <strong>in</strong> criteria A (1) and (2) each cause significant impairment <strong>in</strong> socialor occupational function<strong>in</strong>g and represent a significant decl<strong>in</strong>e from a previous level offunction<strong>in</strong>g.C. The deficits do not occur exclusively dur<strong>in</strong>g the course of a delirium.D. The deficits are not better accounted for by another Axis I disorder 19 (e.g. MajorDepressive Episode, Schizophrenia).Dementia has many causes and more than 100 types of dementia have been documented. Thefive most common types of dementia are: Alzheimer’s disease vascular dementia (multi-<strong>in</strong>farct dementia) mixed Alzheimer’s and vascular dementia dementia with Lewy bodies (Lewy body dementia), and fron<strong>to</strong>temporal dementia (Pick’s disease or Pick’s complex). Fron<strong>to</strong>temporal dementia maynot meet all of the criteria noted for dementia, especially <strong>in</strong> the early stages, but may stillresult <strong>in</strong> significant functional impairment.These types of dementia are all progressive and irreversible, and are characterized byimpairments <strong>in</strong> multiple cognitive functions.In Alzheimer’s disease, the most common form of dementia, the earliest cognitive symp<strong>to</strong>ms<strong>in</strong>clude difficulties <strong>in</strong>: recent memory word f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g confrontation nam<strong>in</strong>g orientation, and concentration.In later stages: slowed rates of <strong>in</strong>formation process<strong>in</strong>g attentional deficits disturbances <strong>in</strong> executive functions, and impairments <strong>in</strong> language, perception and praxisare characteristic.19 This refers <strong>to</strong> the classification of psychiatric disorders <strong>in</strong> the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of MentalDisorders (DSM-IV-TR). See Chapter 19, Psychiatric Disorders, for more <strong>in</strong>formation on this classification system.335


Less commonly, dementias can result from: head <strong>in</strong>jury and trauma bra<strong>in</strong> tumours depression hydrocephalus (excessive accumulation of cerebrosp<strong>in</strong>al fluid (CFS) <strong>in</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong>) bacterial and viral <strong>in</strong>fections <strong>to</strong>xic, endocr<strong>in</strong>e, and metabolic causes, or anoxia.Some of these dementias may be reversible. Specific examples of reversible causes of dementia<strong>in</strong>clude: thyroid deficiency or excess vitam<strong>in</strong> B12 deficiency chronic alcoholism abnormal calcium levels dementia associated with celiac disease, and <strong>in</strong>tracranial space-occupy<strong>in</strong>g lesions.Treatment for dementia has become available over the last decade with cognition enhanc<strong>in</strong>gdrugs such as donepezil (Aricept ), galantam<strong>in</strong>e (Rem<strong>in</strong>yl) and rivastigm<strong>in</strong>e(Exelon). These drugs seem <strong>to</strong> improve symp<strong>to</strong>ms of the disease <strong>in</strong> some stages of dementiabut their therapeutic effect is variable. It is generally considered not likely that treatment withmedication would improve cognition <strong>to</strong> a degree that would enable driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> those whosedriv<strong>in</strong>g skills had decl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>to</strong> an unsafe level or those who had previously failed a driv<strong>in</strong>gassessment due <strong>to</strong> cognitive impairment.Mild cognitive impairmentMild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a term that usually refers <strong>to</strong> the transitional state betweenthe cognitive changes associated with normal ag<strong>in</strong>g and the fully developed cl<strong>in</strong>ical features ofdementia. The diagnostic criteria for MCI are evolv<strong>in</strong>g but <strong>in</strong> general it describes a cognitivedecl<strong>in</strong>e that presents no significant functional impairment.DeliriumDelirium is a condition characterized by a disturbance of consciousness and a change <strong>in</strong>cognition that occurs over a relatively short period of time, usually hours <strong>to</strong> days. Commoncauses of delirium <strong>in</strong>clude: vascular disorders (e.g. stroke, myocardial <strong>in</strong>farct) <strong>in</strong>fections (e.g. ur<strong>in</strong>ary tract, chest) drugs (e.g. analgesics, sedatives, alcohol, illicit drugs), and metabolic disorders (e.g. renal failure, hepatic failure, endocr<strong>in</strong>e disorders).Although the symp<strong>to</strong>ms of delirium may be similar <strong>to</strong> dementia, delirium is temporary andtherefore considered a transient impairment for licens<strong>in</strong>g purposes.336


27.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of cognitive impairment and dementiaEstimates from the Canadian Study on Health and Ag<strong>in</strong>g (1991) suggest that 8% of allCanadians aged 65 and older meet the criteria for dementia, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> 34.5% for those 85 andolder. A 2004 study projected that <strong>in</strong> 2007, there would be 65,780 <strong>in</strong>dividuals with dementia <strong>in</strong>British Columbia, 44,130 of whom would have Alzheimer’s disease.In relation <strong>to</strong> cognitive impairment from any cause that has not been diagnosed as dementia,research <strong>in</strong>dicates that the prevalence is 8% <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals aged 65 <strong>to</strong> 74, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> 42% forthose 85 and older.The prevalence of both cognitive impairment (all causes – not dementia) and dementia <strong>in</strong>creaseswith age. As shown <strong>in</strong> the table below, when comb<strong>in</strong>ed, the prevalence of cognitive impairmentand dementia is 12% <strong>in</strong> those 65 <strong>to</strong> 74 and more than 72% <strong>in</strong> those 85 and older.Prevalence of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment 200 10 20 30 40 50 60 70%65-7475-8485+Alzheimer’s disease and Other DementiaCognitive Impairment (from all causes – not dementia)27.3 Cognitive impairment, dementia and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesResearch clearly <strong>in</strong>dicates that, as a group, those with dementia are at higher risk for adversedriv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes. In particular, <strong>in</strong>dividuals with dementia who experience behaviouraldisturbances and who are treated with psychotropic medications (e.g. anti-psychotics, antidepressants)may be at <strong>in</strong>creased risk. It is important <strong>to</strong> note that studies also <strong>in</strong>dicate that many<strong>in</strong>dividuals with dementia show no evidence of deterioration of driv<strong>in</strong>g skills <strong>in</strong> the early stagesof their illness.20 Source: Canadian Study of Health and Ag<strong>in</strong>g, 1991337


Increased At-Fault Crash RiskThe significance of cognitive impairment and dementia <strong>in</strong> relation <strong>to</strong> other medical conditionswas highlighted <strong>in</strong> a 1999 study done <strong>in</strong> Utah. This study compared citations, crashes and atfaultcrashes <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals with medical conditions <strong>to</strong> those <strong>in</strong> healthy controls matched for age,gender and county of residence. As shown <strong>in</strong> the graph below, the results <strong>in</strong>dicated that<strong>in</strong>dividuals with cognitive impairment (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g dementia) had at-fault crash rates that weremore than 3 times higher than controls. In comparison, the at-fault crash rate for those who hada his<strong>to</strong>ry of alcohol or other drug abuse was 2 times higher than controls.Risk of at-fault crash: selected medical conditions 213.53.02.52.01.51.00.50.0PulmonaryDiabetesVisual AcuityMusculoskeletalPsychiatric IllnessEpilepsyNeurologicalAlcoholCognitive Impair.21 Source: Diller, E, Cook, L, Leonard, D, Read<strong>in</strong>g, J, Dean, JM, Vernon, D. Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g drivers licensed withmedical conditions <strong>in</strong> Utah, 1992-1996. DOT HS 809 023. Wash<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong>n, DC: National Highway Traffic SafetyAdm<strong>in</strong>istration.338


27.4 Effect of cognitive impairment and dementia on functional ability <strong>to</strong> driveCognitive impairment and dementia may affect one or more of the cognitive functions requiredfor driv<strong>in</strong>g.ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessment approachPrimary functionalability affectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsCognitiveimpairmentPersistent Impairment:Functional assessmentCognitive<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportDementiaCognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g<strong>to</strong>ols such as;MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD,Trails A or B<strong>Drive</strong>ABLEassessment27.5 CompensationIndividuals with cognitive impairment or dementia are not able <strong>to</strong> compensate for theirfunctional impairment.339


GUIDELINES27.6 Private and commercial drivers with cognitive impairment or dementiaApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have cognitive impairment or dementia.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates: cognitive impairment, or dementiathat may impair the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMVwill request a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment, unless there has been nosignificant change <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s condition or cognitive abilitys<strong>in</strong>ce a previous functional assessment.If cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessaryfor driv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.Individuals may drive if: the results of a cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g test such as MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD, Trails A, or Trail B <strong>in</strong>dicate that they havesufficient cognitive function <strong>to</strong> drive safely, or where required, a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment or other functionalassessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they are fit <strong>to</strong> drive, and the entirety of the file <strong>in</strong>formation supports a f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of sufficientcognitive function <strong>to</strong> drive safelyOSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if a functional assessment<strong>in</strong>dicates that they have the functional ability required for their classof licence held.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess annually if an <strong>in</strong>dividual has: dementia, or a cognitive impairment that is progressive.The result of a cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g test such as MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD, Trails A, or Trail B, while consider<strong>in</strong>g the entirety ofthe file <strong>in</strong>formation, will <strong>in</strong>form whether further assessment isrequired.340


Chapter 28: Sleep DisordersBACKGROUND28.1 About sleep disordersSleep disorders <strong>in</strong>volve any difficulties related <strong>to</strong> sleep<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: difficulty fall<strong>in</strong>g asleep (<strong>in</strong>somnia) or stay<strong>in</strong>g asleep fall<strong>in</strong>g asleep at <strong>in</strong>appropriate times excessive <strong>to</strong>tal sleep time, or abnormal behaviours associated with sleep.This chapter focuses on the most common form of sleep disordered breath<strong>in</strong>g - obstructive sleepapnea - and on narcolepsy.In addition <strong>to</strong> sleep disorders, a number of other fac<strong>to</strong>rs such as work schedules or lifestylechoices may result <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>adequate nocturnal sleep. Regardless of the cause, the risks of excessivesleep<strong>in</strong>ess for driv<strong>in</strong>g safety are similar.Sleep disordered breath<strong>in</strong>gSleep disordered breath<strong>in</strong>g consists of three dist<strong>in</strong>ct cl<strong>in</strong>ical syndromes: obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS): apnea-hypopnea caused by repeatedclosure of the throat or upper airway dur<strong>in</strong>g sleep. This is the most common form of sleepdisordered breath<strong>in</strong>g. central sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (CSAHS): <strong>in</strong>cludes types of apnea-hypopnea causedby a neurological problem that <strong>in</strong>terferes with the bra<strong>in</strong>’s ability <strong>to</strong> control breath<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>gsleep, as well as high altitude periodic breath<strong>in</strong>g, and apnea-hypopnea due <strong>to</strong> drug orsubstance abuse. sleep hypoventilation syndrome (SHVS): a type of sleep disordered breath<strong>in</strong>g characterizedby <strong>in</strong>sufficient oxygen absorption dur<strong>in</strong>g sleep. It usually occurs <strong>in</strong> association withrestrictive lung disease <strong>in</strong> morbidly obese <strong>in</strong>dividuals, with respira<strong>to</strong>ry muscle weakness, orwith obstructive lung disease such as COPD.Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndromeWith OSAHS, the tissue and muscles of the upper airway repetitively collapse dur<strong>in</strong>g sleep,reduc<strong>in</strong>g or prevent<strong>in</strong>g breath<strong>in</strong>g. As oxygen levels <strong>in</strong> the blood fall, arousal causes the airway<strong>to</strong> re-open. Although <strong>in</strong>dividuals with OSAHS often rema<strong>in</strong> asleep, their sleep patterns aredisrupted. These sleep disturbances result <strong>in</strong> excessive daytime sleep<strong>in</strong>ess. Impairments <strong>in</strong>cognitive function are common <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals with OSAHS and these may <strong>in</strong>clude difficulties <strong>in</strong>: attention concentration341


complex problem solv<strong>in</strong>g, andshort-term recall of verbal and spatial <strong>in</strong>formation.Sleep moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g is used <strong>to</strong> confirm a diagnosis of OSAHS. The preferred test used <strong>in</strong> diagnosisis nocturnal polysomnography. This test <strong>in</strong>volves moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g a number of physiologicalfunctions such as bra<strong>in</strong> activity, respiration, heart activity, and oxygenation of the blood while an<strong>in</strong>dividual is sleep<strong>in</strong>g. A diagnosis of sleep apnea is based on the apnea-hypopnea <strong>in</strong>dex (AHI),where apnea is def<strong>in</strong>ed as a cessation of airflow last<strong>in</strong>g at least 10 seconds and hypopnea isdef<strong>in</strong>ed as a reduction <strong>in</strong> airflow with a decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> blood oxygen level last<strong>in</strong>g at least 10 seconds.Generally, an <strong>in</strong>dividual is diagnosed with sleep apnea if they have greater than 5apnea/hypopnea episodes per hour of sleep.There are a number of scales used <strong>to</strong> measure the severity of OSAHS. A scale based on the AHIdescribes the follow<strong>in</strong>g levels of severity: Mild: 5 <strong>to</strong> 14 events per hour Moderate: 15 <strong>to</strong> 30 events per hour Severe: more than 30 events per hour.Although nocturnal polysomnography is considered <strong>to</strong> be the best test for the diagnosis ofOSAHS, a number of other tests may be used by sleep specialists <strong>to</strong> assist <strong>in</strong> evaluation ordiagnosis. Overnight oximetry is similar <strong>to</strong> polysomnography, but only measures oxygen leveland heart rate. Results from overnight oximetry alone are not considered adequate <strong>to</strong> diagnoseOSAHS.A number of tests are used <strong>to</strong> evaluate daytime sleep<strong>in</strong>ess. These <strong>in</strong>clude the Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance ofWakefulness Test (MWT), the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT), and the Epworth Sleep<strong>in</strong>essScale (ESS). MWT measures the level of daytime drows<strong>in</strong>ess based on how long a person canrema<strong>in</strong> awake dur<strong>in</strong>g the day under controlled conditions. The MSLT is similar <strong>to</strong> the MWT, butmeasures how long it takes a person <strong>to</strong> fall asleep when tak<strong>in</strong>g daytime naps, rather than howlong they can stay awake. The ESS is a subjective test <strong>in</strong> which a person is asked <strong>to</strong> rate on ascale of 1 <strong>to</strong> 4 the likelihood that they would fall asleep <strong>in</strong> different situations, such as whenwatch<strong>in</strong>g TV, rid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a car, and engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> conversation.Treatment options for OSAHS <strong>in</strong>clude: lifestyle changes such as weight loss, alcohol abst<strong>in</strong>ence, or change <strong>in</strong> sleep position the use of oral appliances the use of a nasal cont<strong>in</strong>uous positive airway pressure (CPAP) device, bariatric surgery (for morbidly obese <strong>in</strong>dividuals), and <strong>in</strong> rare cases, corrective upper airway surgery.CPAP is the most effective treatment, and the only one which has been shown <strong>to</strong> reduce the riskof mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle crashes. A CPAP mach<strong>in</strong>e blows heated, humidified air through a short tube <strong>to</strong>a mask worn by the <strong>in</strong>dividual while sleep<strong>in</strong>g. As the <strong>in</strong>dividual breathes, air pressure from theCPAP mach<strong>in</strong>e holds the nose, palate, and throat tissues open.342


An immediate reduction <strong>in</strong> daytime sleep<strong>in</strong>ess is often reported with CPAP treatment, althoughstudies <strong>in</strong>dicate that approximately 6 weeks of treatment are required for maximum improvement<strong>in</strong> symp<strong>to</strong>ms. Estimates of compliance with CPAP treatment vary depend<strong>in</strong>g on how they aremeasured. Subjective rates of compliance based on self-report are higher than objectivelydeterm<strong>in</strong>ed rates. Us<strong>in</strong>g objective measures, a 1993 study found that 46% of <strong>in</strong>dividuals wereacceptably compliant with their CPAP treatment. The study def<strong>in</strong>ed acceptable compliance asthe use of the CPAP mach<strong>in</strong>e for at least four hours per night for more than 70% of the observednights.NarcolepsyNarcolepsy is a chronic neurological disorder <strong>in</strong> which the bra<strong>in</strong> is unable <strong>to</strong> regulate sleep-wakecycles normally. It is characterized by excessive daytime sleep<strong>in</strong>ess and may also causecataplexy (abrupt loss of muscle <strong>to</strong>ne), halluc<strong>in</strong>ations and sleep paralysis. There is no knowncure. The symp<strong>to</strong>ms of narcolepsy relevant <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g are sleep<strong>in</strong>ess and cataplexy.The excessive daytime sleep<strong>in</strong>ess of narcolepsy comprises both a background feel<strong>in</strong>g ofsleep<strong>in</strong>ess present much of the time and a strong, sometimes irresistible, urge <strong>to</strong> sleep recurr<strong>in</strong>gat <strong>in</strong>tervals through the day. This desire is heightened by conducive or mono<strong>to</strong>nouscircumstances, but naps at <strong>in</strong>appropriate times, such as dur<strong>in</strong>g meals, are characteristic. Thenaps associated with narcolepsy usually last from m<strong>in</strong>utes <strong>to</strong> an hour and occur a few times eachday. Potential secondary symp<strong>to</strong>ms related <strong>to</strong> sleep<strong>in</strong>ess may <strong>in</strong>clude visual blurr<strong>in</strong>g, diplopiaand cognitive impairment. Cognitive impairment may <strong>in</strong>clude difficulties with attention andmemory.Cataplexy refers <strong>to</strong> an abrupt loss of skeletal muscle <strong>to</strong>ne. It is estimated that 60 <strong>to</strong> 90% of<strong>in</strong>dividuals with narcolepsy experience cataplexy. Dur<strong>in</strong>g a cataplexy attack, which can last up<strong>to</strong> several m<strong>in</strong>utes and occur several times a day, an <strong>in</strong>dividual rema<strong>in</strong>s conscious but is unable<strong>to</strong> move. Generalized attacks can cause an <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>to</strong> completely collapse, although themuscles of the diaphragm and the eyes rema<strong>in</strong> unaffected. Partial attacks, which affect onlycerta<strong>in</strong> muscle groups, are more common than generalized attacks. Laughter or humorous eventsare a common trigger of cataplexy attacks, although anger, embarrassment, surprise or sexualarousal can also trigger an attack.As there is no cure, treatment for narcolepsy is focussed on the control of sleep<strong>in</strong>ess andcataplexy where present. Medications used for treatment may <strong>in</strong>clude: stimulants such as Modaf<strong>in</strong>il (Altertec) tricyclic anti-depressants selective sero<strong>to</strong>n<strong>in</strong> reuptake <strong>in</strong>hibi<strong>to</strong>rs venlafax<strong>in</strong>e (Effexor), or reboxet<strong>in</strong>e (Edronax).See Chapter 29, Over-The-Counter and Prescription Drugs, for more <strong>in</strong>formation aboutmedications and driv<strong>in</strong>g.343


28.2 Prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of sleep disordersOSAHS affects between at least 2% of women and 4% of men. It is more prevalent amongmiddle aged and older <strong>in</strong>dividuals and those who are obese. It commonly rema<strong>in</strong>s undiagnosed,with estimates suggest<strong>in</strong>g that 93% of women and 82% of men with moderate <strong>to</strong> severe sleepapnea are undiagnosed.Canadian data on the prevalence of narcolepsy are lack<strong>in</strong>g. Research <strong>in</strong> the United States<strong>in</strong>dicates a prevalence rate of 47 per 100,000 <strong>in</strong>dividuals (.05%). It is more common <strong>in</strong> men than<strong>in</strong> women.28.3 Sleep disorders and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesNumerous studies have <strong>in</strong>vestigated the relationship between OSAHS and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>goutcomes. The majority of studies <strong>in</strong>dicate that <strong>in</strong>dividuals with OSAHS have a 2 <strong>to</strong> 4 timesgreater risk for a crash, and the crashes result <strong>in</strong> more severe <strong>in</strong>juries. Although numerous testsare available <strong>to</strong> measure daytime sleep<strong>in</strong>ess, the research also <strong>in</strong>dicates that measures of daytimesleep<strong>in</strong>ess and the severity of sleep apnea are not consistent predic<strong>to</strong>rs of impairments <strong>in</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>gperformance.Unlike OSAHS, there are few studies on narcolepsy and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes. Althoughlimited, this research suggests that narcolepsy is also associated with elevated crash rates.28.4 Effect of sleep disorders on functional ability <strong>to</strong> driveConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessmentapproachPrimaryfunctionalabilityaffectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsOSAHSNarcolepsyEpisodicimpairment:Medical assessment– likelihood ofimpairmentAll – sudden<strong>in</strong>capacitationCognitive –reducedalertness<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportSpecialist’s reportPersistentimpairment:FunctionalassessmentCognitive<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportCognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>olssuch as; MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD, Trails Aor B<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment344


28.5 CompensationIndividuals with sleep disorders are not able <strong>to</strong> compensate for their impairment.Recently, a number of warn<strong>in</strong>g systems for drowsy drivers have been developed. These systemsare designed <strong>to</strong> detect drows<strong>in</strong>ess by moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g the driver’s eye movement, head movement orother physical activity, or by sens<strong>in</strong>g when a vehicle is drift<strong>in</strong>g on the road. When drows<strong>in</strong>ess issuspected, a warn<strong>in</strong>g system alerts the driver. These systems are <strong>in</strong> various stages ofdevelopment and production.Research on the effectiveness of drowsy driv<strong>in</strong>g warn<strong>in</strong>g systems is limited. The exist<strong>in</strong>gresearch <strong>in</strong>dicates that these technologies show promise as a means <strong>to</strong> warn drivers of fatigue ordrows<strong>in</strong>ess. However, it is recognized that alertness is a complex phenomenon, and no s<strong>in</strong>glemeasure alone may be sensitive and reliable enough <strong>to</strong> quantify driver fatigue. Further researchand development is required before the use of these warn<strong>in</strong>g systems can be applied <strong>in</strong> driverfitness decisions.345


GUIDELINES28.6 Private and commercial drivers with untreated OSAApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have untreated obstructive sleep apnea(OSA).If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a respirologist.If cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessaryfor driv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicates possiblepersistent impairment of the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMV will request a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment, unless therehas been no significant change <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s condition orcognitive ability s<strong>in</strong>ce a previous functional assessment.Individuals may drive if: they have no his<strong>to</strong>ry of sleep related mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle crashes orsleep at the wheel <strong>in</strong> the last 5 years the results of a cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g test such as MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD, Trails A or Trails B <strong>in</strong>dicate that they havesufficient cognitive function <strong>to</strong> drive, or where required, a<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they are fit <strong>to</strong> drive they understand the nature of their condition and the potentialimpact on fitness <strong>to</strong> drive they agree <strong>to</strong> report any episodes of sleep at the wheel <strong>to</strong> theirtreat<strong>in</strong>g physician and OSMV, and for commercial drivers, they have not decl<strong>in</strong>ed further<strong>in</strong>vestigation or treatment of OSAHS where it has beenrecommended by their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they have no his<strong>to</strong>ry of sleep related mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle crashes orsleep at the wheel <strong>in</strong> the last 5 years the results of a cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g test such as MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD, Trails A or Trails B <strong>in</strong>dicate that they havesufficient cognitive function <strong>to</strong> drive, or where required, a<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they are fit <strong>to</strong> drive they understand the nature of their condition and the potential346


OSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>es cont’dConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleimpact on fitness <strong>to</strong> drivethey agree <strong>to</strong> report any episodes of sleep at the wheel <strong>to</strong> theirtreat<strong>in</strong>g physician and OSMV, andfor commercial drivers, they have not decl<strong>in</strong>ed further<strong>in</strong>vestigation or treatment of OSAHS where it has beenrecommended by their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.OSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g condition on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who isfound fit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must cease driv<strong>in</strong>g and report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician ifyou have an episode of sleep at the wheelNo restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess private drivers every two years or asrecommended by the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.OSMV will re-assess commercial drivers annually.The primary concerns with OSAHS are daytime sleep<strong>in</strong>ess (risk ofsleep while driv<strong>in</strong>g) and persistent cognitive impairment.Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g who is at risk of adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes due <strong>to</strong>daytime sleep<strong>in</strong>ess is problematic. Because exist<strong>in</strong>g measures ofdaytime sleep<strong>in</strong>ess and the severity of sleep apnea are not consistentpredic<strong>to</strong>rs of impairments <strong>in</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g performance, the fitnessguidel<strong>in</strong>es look <strong>to</strong> driver his<strong>to</strong>ry of sleep at the wheel for identify<strong>in</strong>gcurrent risk of sleep while driv<strong>in</strong>g. They also emphasize theresponsibility of the driver <strong>to</strong> be attentive <strong>to</strong> the risk for daytimesleep<strong>in</strong>ess.Commercial drivers with untreated OSAHS may not cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>to</strong> driveunless they follow their treat<strong>in</strong>g physician’s recommendations forfurther <strong>in</strong>vestigation or treatment, even where daytime sleep<strong>in</strong>ess hasnot been reported or cognitive impairment. This applies only <strong>to</strong>commercial drivers because of the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> the correlationbetween severity of sleep apnea and impaired driv<strong>in</strong>g performance.347


28.7 Private and commercial drivers with treated OSAApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for private andcommercial drivers who have obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) that has beentreated or surgically treated.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician a sleep study report, or an assessment from a respirologist.If cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicates possible persistentimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMV willrequest a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment, unless there has been no significantchange <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s condition or cognitive ability s<strong>in</strong>ce a previousfunctional assessment.Individuals may drive if: the effectiveness of their treatment has been established through repeatsleep moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g where applicable, they rema<strong>in</strong> compliant with their treatment regime.For CPAP treatment, compliance means a m<strong>in</strong>imum of 4 hours of useon at least 70% of nights, objectively documented. the results of a cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g test such as MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD, Trails A or Trails B <strong>in</strong>dicate that they have sufficientcognitive function <strong>to</strong> drive, or where required, a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLEassessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they are fit <strong>to</strong> drive they understand the nature of their condition and the potential impact onfitness <strong>to</strong> drive, and they agree <strong>to</strong> report any episodes of sleep at the wheel <strong>to</strong> their treat<strong>in</strong>gphysician and OSMV.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the effectiveness of their treatment has been established through repeatsleep moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g where applicable, they rema<strong>in</strong> compliant with their treatment regime.For CPAP treatment, compliance means a m<strong>in</strong>imum of 4 hours of useon at least 70% of nights, objectively documented. the results of a cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g test such as MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD, Trails A or Trails B <strong>in</strong>dicate that they have sufficientcognitive function <strong>to</strong> drive, or where required, a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLEassessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they are fit <strong>to</strong> drive they understand the nature of their condition and the potential impact onfitness <strong>to</strong> drive, and they agree <strong>to</strong> report any episodes of sleep at the wheel <strong>to</strong> their treat<strong>in</strong>gphysician and OSMV.348


ConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleOSMV will impose the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions on an <strong>in</strong>dividual who is foundfit <strong>to</strong> drive: you must cease driv<strong>in</strong>g and report <strong>to</strong> OSMV and your physician if youhave an episode of sleep at the wheel, and you must rout<strong>in</strong>ely follow your treatment regime and physician’s adviceregard<strong>in</strong>g prevention of sleep at the wheel.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess private drivers every two years or as recommended bythe treat<strong>in</strong>g physician.OSMV will re-assess commercial drivers annually.The fitness guidel<strong>in</strong>es for drivers with treated OSAHS focus on mitigat<strong>in</strong>gthe risk by ensur<strong>in</strong>g that treatment is effective and drivers are compliantwith their treatment where applicable.349


28.8 Private drivers with narcolepsyApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privatedrivers who have narcolepsy.If further <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition isrequired, OSMV will request: a <strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ation Report additional <strong>in</strong>formation from the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or an assessment from a respirologist.If cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessaryfor driv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicates possiblepersistent impairment of the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMV will request a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment, unless therehas been no significant change <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s condition orcognitive ability s<strong>in</strong>ce a previous functional assessment.Individuals may drive if: they have had no daytime sleep attacks, with or without treatment,dur<strong>in</strong>g the past 12 months they have had no episodes of cataplexy, with or withouttreatment, dur<strong>in</strong>g the past 12 months, and the results of a cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g test such as MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD, Trails A or Trails B <strong>in</strong>dicate that they havesufficient cognitive function <strong>to</strong> drive, or where required, a<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they are fit <strong>to</strong> drive.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: they have had no daytime sleep attacks, with or without treatment,dur<strong>in</strong>g the past 12 months they have had no episodes of cataplexy, with or withouttreatment, dur<strong>in</strong>g the past 12 months, and the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g does not <strong>in</strong>dicatepossible impairment of the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g or, where the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>dicates possible impairment of the cognitive functionsnecessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that theyhave the functional ability required <strong>to</strong> drive a private vehicle.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess annually. If no episodes or attacks are reported,OSMV may assess less frequently upon the recommendation of thetreat<strong>in</strong>g physician.350


Policy rationaleThe general approach of the guidel<strong>in</strong>es for drivers with narcolepsy isthat attacks must be controlled as a prerequisite <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g. Where an<strong>in</strong>dividual is treated, the guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>clude a requirement for anattack-free period <strong>to</strong> establish the likelihood that: a therapeutic drug level has been achieved and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>edthe drug be<strong>in</strong>g used will prevent further attacks, andthere are no side effects that may affect the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s ability <strong>to</strong>drive safely.The episodic risk of a sleep attack or cataplexy while driv<strong>in</strong>g isaddressed <strong>in</strong> the requirement for a 12 month period without anepisode prior <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g. The length of this no driv<strong>in</strong>g period is basedon consensus medical op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> Canada.351


28.9 Commercial drivers with narcolepsyApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations forcommercial drivers who have narcolepsy.OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.Individuals may not drive.Individuals are not fit <strong>to</strong> drive.N/AN/AN/AConsensus medical op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> Canada <strong>in</strong>dicates that the risks fromthe <strong>in</strong>creased driv<strong>in</strong>g exposure associated with commercial driv<strong>in</strong>gare such that <strong>in</strong>dividuals with narcolepsy are not fit <strong>to</strong> drive.352


Chapter 29: Prescription and Over-The-Counter DrugsBACKGROUND29.1 About psychotropic drugsIt is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly clear that psychotropic (capable of affect<strong>in</strong>g the m<strong>in</strong>d, emotions, or behaviour)drugs contribute <strong>to</strong> impairment <strong>in</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g performance. In a European Union study from 1993, itwas estimated that approximately 10% of all people killed or <strong>in</strong>jured <strong>in</strong> crashes were tak<strong>in</strong>gpsychotropic medication, which might have been a contribu<strong>to</strong>ry fac<strong>to</strong>r <strong>in</strong> the crashes.This chapter focuses on drugs that are commonly prescribed or used <strong>to</strong> treat medical conditions,and that are known <strong>to</strong> have psychotropic effects or potential side effects that could impairfunctional ability <strong>to</strong> drive. Illicit drugs are not considered <strong>in</strong> this chapter.Opioids (narcotics)Opioids are derived from natural opium or a synthetically produced equivalent and are usedprimarily for moderate <strong>to</strong> severe pa<strong>in</strong> relief. Opioid drugs <strong>in</strong>clude the follow<strong>in</strong>g: code<strong>in</strong>e fentanyl [Duragesic®] morph<strong>in</strong>e [MS-Cont<strong>in</strong>®, M-Eslon®] meperid<strong>in</strong>e [Demerol®] methadone pentazoc<strong>in</strong>e [Talw<strong>in</strong>®] hydromorphone [Dilaudid®, Hydromorph Cont<strong>in</strong>®] oxycodone [Percodan®, Percocet®, Endocet®, Supeudol®, OxyNeo®], and hydrocodone [Hycodan®]AntidepressantsAntidepressants are used <strong>in</strong> the treatment of major depression and a variety of other conditionssuch as chronic pa<strong>in</strong>, anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, eat<strong>in</strong>g disorders, and personalitydisorders. Classes of antidepressants and examples of drugs from each class are listed <strong>in</strong> thetable below..353


Class Generic Name Brand Nameamitriptyl<strong>in</strong>e Elavil®imipram<strong>in</strong>e Tofranil®Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs)nortriptyl<strong>in</strong>e Aventyl®desipram<strong>in</strong>e Norpram<strong>in</strong>®clomipram<strong>in</strong>e Anafranil®doxep<strong>in</strong> S<strong>in</strong>equan®Sero<strong>to</strong>n<strong>in</strong> antagonist-reuptake <strong>in</strong>hibi<strong>to</strong>r (SARIs) trazadone Desyrel®fluoxet<strong>in</strong>e Prozac®fluvoxam<strong>in</strong>e Luvox®Selective sero<strong>to</strong>n<strong>in</strong>-reuptake <strong>in</strong>hibi<strong>to</strong>rs (SSRIs) sertral<strong>in</strong>e Zoloft®citalopram Celexa®paroxet<strong>in</strong>e Paxil®Dual action agents (DAAs) venlafax<strong>in</strong>e Effexor®Atypical Antidepressants bupropion Zyban®,Wellbutr<strong>in</strong> SR®phenelz<strong>in</strong>e Nardil®Monoam<strong>in</strong>e oxidase <strong>in</strong>hibi<strong>to</strong>rstranylcyprom<strong>in</strong>e Parnate®moclobemide various genericAntiepilepticsThe follow<strong>in</strong>g are 8 major categories of drugs used <strong>in</strong> the treatment of epilepsy and otherconditions such as mood disorders or pa<strong>in</strong>, <strong>in</strong> approximate order of the date they were<strong>in</strong>troduced: barbiturates and derivatives (phenobarbital) succ<strong>in</strong>imide derivatives (methsuximid [Celont<strong>in</strong>]) hydan<strong>to</strong><strong>in</strong> derivatives (pheny<strong>to</strong><strong>in</strong> [Dilant<strong>in</strong>]) im<strong>in</strong>ostilbene derivatives (carbamazep<strong>in</strong>e [Tegre<strong>to</strong>l]) benzodiazep<strong>in</strong>es (clonazepam [Clonapam®]) carboxylic acid derivatives (divalproex sodium [Epival], valproic acid [Depakene]) various anticonvulsants (lamotrig<strong>in</strong>e [Lamictal], <strong>to</strong>pirimate [Topamax]), and GABA derivatives (gabapent<strong>in</strong> [Neuront<strong>in</strong>]).Antihistam<strong>in</strong>esAntihistam<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>hibit the activity of histam<strong>in</strong>e, a prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> many allergic reactions.They are commonly prescribed <strong>to</strong> alleviate the symp<strong>to</strong>ms of allergic reactions.Examples of older antihistam<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>clude: tripolid<strong>in</strong>e & pseudoephedr<strong>in</strong>e [Actifed] diphenhydram<strong>in</strong>e [Benadryl], and chlorpheniram<strong>in</strong>e [ChlorTripolon]354


Examples of newer antihistam<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>clude: loratad<strong>in</strong>e [Clarit<strong>in</strong>] ceteriz<strong>in</strong>e [React<strong>in</strong>e] deslor-atad<strong>in</strong>e [Clar<strong>in</strong>ex], and desloratad<strong>in</strong>e [Aerius] fexofenad<strong>in</strong>e [Allegra].AntipsychoticsAntipsychotics are used primarily <strong>in</strong> the management of serious mental disorders such asschizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and organic psychoses (psychiatric symp<strong>to</strong>ms aris<strong>in</strong>g fromdamage <strong>to</strong> or disease <strong>in</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong>). The two major groups of antipsychotics are the “typical” orconventional antipsychotics, <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> the early 1950’s, and the “atypical” antipsychotics,<strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> the early 1990’s and later.Examples of typical antipsychotics <strong>in</strong>clude: haloperidol [Haldol®] chlorpromaz<strong>in</strong>e [Largactil] loxap<strong>in</strong>e [Lozapac] trifluoperaz<strong>in</strong>e [Stelaz<strong>in</strong>e]Examples of atypical antipsychotics <strong>in</strong>clude: clozap<strong>in</strong>e [Clozaril®] risperidone [Risperdal® olanzap<strong>in</strong>e [Zyprexa®] quetiap<strong>in</strong>e [Seroquel®] ziprasidone [Zeldox] Aripiprazole [Abilify] Paliperidone [Invega]Non-steroidal anti-<strong>in</strong>flamma<strong>to</strong>riesNon-steroidal anti-<strong>in</strong>flamma<strong>to</strong>ry drugs (NSAIDs) are used for pa<strong>in</strong> relief, the reduction of fever,and <strong>to</strong> reduce <strong>in</strong>flammation. Examples of NSAIDs <strong>in</strong>clude: aspir<strong>in</strong> acetylsalicylic acid [Aspir<strong>in</strong>, Entrophen] diclofenac [Voltaren®] ibuprofen [Motr<strong>in</strong>®, Advil] celecoxib [Celebrex®], and <strong>in</strong>domethac<strong>in</strong> [Indocid®] naproxen [Anaprox, Aleve, Naprosyn].355


NSAIDs often are used <strong>in</strong> the treatment of mild <strong>to</strong> moderate pa<strong>in</strong>, and <strong>in</strong>flammation, and fever <strong>in</strong>both acute and chronic conditions, such as: rheuma<strong>to</strong>id arthritis and osteoarthritis gout metastatic bone pa<strong>in</strong> headaches and migra<strong>in</strong>es, and mild <strong>to</strong> moderate pa<strong>in</strong> due <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>flammation and tissue <strong>in</strong>jury (e.g., pa<strong>in</strong> associated with <strong>to</strong>othextraction, root canal, sports <strong>in</strong>juries, etc.). menstrual pa<strong>in</strong>Sedatives and hypnoticsSedative and hypnotic drugs are central nervous system depressants. They are used <strong>to</strong> treatanxiety, <strong>in</strong>somnia, alcohol withdrawal, as muscle relaxants, and anticonvulsants. The majorcategories are barbiturates, benzodiazep<strong>in</strong>es and a new class of non-benzodiazep<strong>in</strong>e sedativescalled Z drugs.Benzodiazep<strong>in</strong>es can be divided <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> short-act<strong>in</strong>g with a short half-life (less than 12 hrs), whichgenerally are used <strong>to</strong> treat <strong>in</strong>somnia, <strong>in</strong>termediate-act<strong>in</strong>g with a half-life (12 <strong>to</strong> 24 hrs), and longact<strong>in</strong>gwith a long half-life (more than 24 hrs), which are used <strong>to</strong> treat anxiety.Categories of sedatives and hypnotics, with examples of drugs <strong>in</strong> each category, are provided <strong>in</strong>the table below.Category Generic Name Brand NameBarbiturates phenobarbital various genericsalprazolamXanaxBenzodiazep<strong>in</strong>es with a short half-life triazolamHalcion®oxazepamSerax®Benzodiazep<strong>in</strong>es with an <strong>in</strong>termediatelorazepamAtivan®half-lifetemazepamRes<strong>to</strong>ril®clordiazepoxide Librium®clonazepamRivotrilBenzodiazep<strong>in</strong>es with a long half-lifediazepamValium®clorazepateTranxene®flurazepamDalmaneZ drugs (non-benzodiazep<strong>in</strong>es)zopicloneImovane®zolpidemSubl<strong>in</strong>ox356


Stimulants (for ADHD)Examples of stimulants used <strong>in</strong> the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder(ADHD) and Narcolepsy <strong>in</strong>clude: methylphenidate [Rital<strong>in</strong>®, Concerta®, Biphent<strong>in</strong>®] mixed amphetam<strong>in</strong>e salts [Adderall®] dextroamphetam<strong>in</strong>e [Dexedr<strong>in</strong>e®], and modaf<strong>in</strong>il [Alertec®]29.2 PrevalenceOpioidsNo data is available on the use of opioids as a treatment for medical conditions <strong>in</strong> Canada.AntidepressantsThe most commonly used classes of antidepressants are SSRIs, dual action agents, and tricyclics.Research from 2002 showed that SSRIs had a 46.3% market share, dual action agents had 23.9%and tricyclics had 23.7%. The least commonly used class was monoam<strong>in</strong>e oxidase <strong>in</strong>hibi<strong>to</strong>rs,with a 2.1% market share.Between 1981 and 2000, <strong>to</strong>tal prescriptions for antidepressants <strong>in</strong>creased almost five fold, from3.2 <strong>to</strong> 14.5 million. The 2002 Canadian Community Health Survey <strong>in</strong>dicated that 5.8% ofCanadians were tak<strong>in</strong>g antidepressants. Of those who had a major depressive episode <strong>in</strong> the pastyear, 40.4% were tak<strong>in</strong>g antidepressants.AntiepilepticsNo data on the prevalence of antiepileptic drug use <strong>in</strong> Canada is available. Epilepsy itself has aprevalence rate of 0.6% <strong>in</strong> the Canadian population. The <strong>in</strong>cidence of epilepsy is 15,500 newcases per year, with 60% of these be<strong>in</strong>g young children or seniors. Because of the variability ofthe presentation of epilepsy among those diagnosed, and the use of antiepileptic drugs forconditions other than epilepsy, it is difficult <strong>to</strong> extrapolate the prevalence of anticonvulsant druguse based on the prevalence and <strong>in</strong>cidence of epilepsy.Antihistam<strong>in</strong>esThe general use of antihistam<strong>in</strong>es is difficult <strong>to</strong> ascerta<strong>in</strong>. However, it has been estimated thatallergic conditions that may be treated with antihistam<strong>in</strong>es affect 10% <strong>to</strong> 25% of the population.AntipsychoticsPrevalence statistics on the use of antipsychotics <strong>in</strong> Canada us<strong>in</strong>g population based surveys arecomplicated by low prevalence and questionable validity.357


Non-steroidal anti-<strong>in</strong>flamma<strong>to</strong>riesNSAIDs are among the most commonly used pharmacological agents, with 10 millionprescriptions dispensed annually <strong>in</strong> Canada. The use of NSAIDs is predicted <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease with theag<strong>in</strong>g population due <strong>to</strong> the association between age and musculoskeletal disorders such asosteoarthritis and rheuma<strong>to</strong>id arthritis.Sedatives and hypnoticsData from 2002 Canadian Community Health Survey <strong>in</strong>dicated that the percentage of those whohad used a sedative or hypnotic <strong>in</strong>creased with age, mov<strong>in</strong>g from 3.1% of the general population15 years and older, <strong>to</strong> 11.1% for those 75 and older. Overall, 7.2% of those with anxietydisorders had taken a sedative-hypnotic over the two days preced<strong>in</strong>g the survey.Benzodiazep<strong>in</strong>e use made up most of the sedative-hypnotic use <strong>in</strong> all analyzed demographic anddiagnostic groups. Information from this survey and other studies <strong>in</strong>dicate that benzodiazep<strong>in</strong>esare one of the most frequently used classes of drugs by seniors and women.Stimulants (for ADHD) and NarcolepsyNo data is available on the prevalence or <strong>in</strong>cidence of the use of stimulants as a treatment forADHD <strong>in</strong> Canada. An <strong>in</strong>dication of the use of stimulants for ADHD may be gleaned from theprevalence of the condition itself. Research <strong>in</strong>dicates that ADHD affects between 3% and 10%of children and between 4% and 6% of adults. Of adolescents and adults with ADHD, 76%achieve a therapeutic response with stimulant medication.29.3 Psychotropic drugs and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesOpioidsResearch <strong>in</strong>dicates that the use of opioids can adversely affect driv<strong>in</strong>g performance, with thedegree of impairment dependent on the particular opioid used, dosage, previous use, developed<strong>to</strong>lerance, and time of day taken.AntidepressantsCurrently, there is little evidence <strong>to</strong> associate SSRIs or dual action agents with impaired driv<strong>in</strong>gperformance. Although limited, research <strong>in</strong>dicates that the use of tricyclic antidepressants isassociated with impairments <strong>in</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g performance. This is evidenced by elevated crash rates,as well as measures of on-road performance and labora<strong>to</strong>ry tests of psychomo<strong>to</strong>r and cognitivefunction<strong>in</strong>g.358


AntiepilepticsIn general, <strong>in</strong>dividuals with epilepsy have an <strong>in</strong>creased risk for adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes, whichmay be caused by either the episodic impairment (seizures) or persistent impairments caused bythe condition or treatment.Antihistam<strong>in</strong>esResearch <strong>in</strong>dicates that the use of older antihistam<strong>in</strong>es may impair driv<strong>in</strong>g performance.However, newer antihistam<strong>in</strong>es used <strong>in</strong> therapeutic doses do not appear <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease the risk ofadverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes.AntipsychoticsStudies exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the driv<strong>in</strong>g performance of <strong>in</strong>dividuals treated with antipsychotics (primarilythose with Schizophrenia) <strong>in</strong>dicate that those treated with atypical antipsychotics perform betterthan those treated with typical antipsychotics. However, less than 33% of those on atypicalantipsychotics and 5% <strong>to</strong> 11% of those on typical antipsychotics were found <strong>to</strong> have adequatedriv<strong>in</strong>g performance. It should be noted that these results are based on functional tests conducted<strong>in</strong> a labora<strong>to</strong>ry sett<strong>in</strong>g, and the relationship of these results <strong>to</strong> actual driv<strong>in</strong>g performance has notbeen established. Further, it is difficult <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e the relative impact of the underly<strong>in</strong>gcondition and antipsychotic treatment on driv<strong>in</strong>g performance.Non-steroidal anti-<strong>in</strong>flamma<strong>to</strong>riesThere is only a small body of literature related <strong>to</strong> the effects of NSAIDs on driv<strong>in</strong>g performance.These studies <strong>in</strong>dicate that the use of NSAIDs is associated with an <strong>in</strong>creased risk of crash <strong>in</strong>both young and old drivers.Sedatives and hypnoticsResearch <strong>in</strong>dicates that the use of sedatives and hypnotics is associated with a significant risk foradverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomes.Stimulants (for ADHD)There is some <strong>in</strong>dication that pharmacological treatment of ADHD with stimulants may have apositive effect on driv<strong>in</strong>g performance. However, research <strong>in</strong> this area has primarily relied ondriv<strong>in</strong>g simula<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> measure outcomes. A few studies have <strong>in</strong>vestigated the relationshipbetween pharmacological treatment of ADHD and on-road performance, but methodologicallimitations, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g small sample size (< 20 <strong>in</strong> all cases), limit the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs.359


29.4 Effect of psychotropic drugs on functional ability <strong>to</strong> driveOSMV is primarily concerned with the persistent cognitive impairment associated with theeffects or side effects of medication used for ongo<strong>in</strong>g treatment of medical conditions. Potentialtemporary impairments from short-term treatment or changes <strong>in</strong> dosage or type of medication areconsidered transient impairments for licens<strong>in</strong>g purposes.OpioidsThe use of opioids results <strong>in</strong> depression of the central nervous system. Possible effects on thefunctions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clude: blurred vision poor night vision slowed reaction times tremors impairment of short-term/work<strong>in</strong>g memory and attention disorientation or halluc<strong>in</strong>ations sedation, and muscle rigidityThe effects of opioids on an <strong>in</strong>dividual depend on a number of fac<strong>to</strong>rs, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the length ofuse, dosage, and propensity for abuse or addiction. Tolerance is an important consideration <strong>in</strong>that adverse effects may be evident dur<strong>in</strong>g acute use but dim<strong>in</strong>ish as <strong>to</strong>lerance develops.AntidepressantsThe effects of antidepressants on cognitive ability vary by therapeutic class. Depression itselfmay result <strong>in</strong> cognitive impairment. While the use of antidepressants may improve cognitivefunction, the side effects may <strong>in</strong>clude cognitive impairment, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: impairment of thought process<strong>in</strong>g attentional deficits <strong>in</strong>decisiveness, and impairment of psychomo<strong>to</strong>r function.Therefore, dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g between the effects of the disorder and the side-effects ofantidepressants may be a challenge.Tricyclic antidepressantsThe major side effects of TCAs that may affect driv<strong>in</strong>g are antichol<strong>in</strong>ergic effects such asconfusion or blurred vision and sedat<strong>in</strong>g effects. The follow<strong>in</strong>g table outl<strong>in</strong>es the severity of thesedat<strong>in</strong>g effect of common TCAs.360


Sedat<strong>in</strong>g EffectLowModerateHighTCAsdesipram<strong>in</strong>e [Norpram<strong>in</strong>®], nortriptyl<strong>in</strong>e [Aventyl®], amoxap<strong>in</strong>e[Asend<strong>in</strong>®]imipram<strong>in</strong>e [Tofranil®]amitriptyl<strong>in</strong>e [Elavil®], doxep<strong>in</strong> [S<strong>in</strong>equan®]Selective sero<strong>to</strong>n<strong>in</strong>-reuptake <strong>in</strong>hibi<strong>to</strong>rsSSRIs generally have fewer side effects than TCAs. Nonetheless, some studies have shownimpairments <strong>in</strong> both cognitive and psychomo<strong>to</strong>r function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals us<strong>in</strong>g SSRIs.Dual action antidepressantsResearch <strong>in</strong>dicates that DAAs (atypical antidepressants <strong>in</strong>cluded), the most recently <strong>in</strong>troducedclass of antidepressants, have fewer side effects than TCAs or SSRIs, but cognitive impairmentassociated with depression and/or treatment may still be present.AntiepilepticsAnticonvulsants may impair mo<strong>to</strong>r and sensory functions, produc<strong>in</strong>g: ataxia (lack of coord<strong>in</strong>ation; unstead<strong>in</strong>ess) nystagmus (uncontrollable rapid eye movement) blurr<strong>in</strong>g and double vision tremor poor concentration, and/or slowed th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>gDisruption of normal cognitive function is a frequent and pervasive side effect of anticonvulsantdrugs. A variety of cognitive abilities may be affected, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g memory, reaction time,executive function<strong>in</strong>g, and problem solv<strong>in</strong>g.The known side effects of first generation anticonvulsant drugs (phenobarbital, pheny<strong>to</strong><strong>in</strong>,benzodiazep<strong>in</strong>es, and valproate) <strong>in</strong>clude sedation and cognitive dysfunction. Adverse cognitiveeffects, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g impairments <strong>in</strong> memory and attention, are also evident with the use of morerecently <strong>in</strong>troduced anticonvulsant drugs (e.g., <strong>to</strong>piramate), though these generally have fewerside effects.Antihistam<strong>in</strong>esHistam<strong>in</strong>e is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> many bra<strong>in</strong> functions, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the wak<strong>in</strong>g-sleep cycle, attention,memory, learn<strong>in</strong>g and excitation. The effects of antihistam<strong>in</strong>es differ depend<strong>in</strong>g on theirgeneration. Older antihistam<strong>in</strong>es, such as tripolid<strong>in</strong>e [Actifed®], dephenhydram<strong>in</strong>e[Benadryl®], and clemast<strong>in</strong>e or terfenad<strong>in</strong>e [Seldane®] are associated with profound sedation,impaired psychomo<strong>to</strong>r function, and blurred vision.Newer antihistam<strong>in</strong>es, such as:361


loratad<strong>in</strong>e [Clarit<strong>in</strong>®]ceteriz<strong>in</strong>e [React<strong>in</strong>e®]fexofenad<strong>in</strong>e [Allegra®], anddesloratad<strong>in</strong>e [Aerius®]are largely free from the sedat<strong>in</strong>g effects of the older antihistam<strong>in</strong>es. However, at high doses,significant side-effects have been reported, though still less pronounced than those associatedwith older antihistam<strong>in</strong>es.Beta-blockersBeta-blockers such as: propanolol [Inderal®] atenolol [Tenorm<strong>in</strong>®]Common side effects of beta-blockers <strong>in</strong>clude tiredness, sleep disturbances, and dizz<strong>in</strong>ess. Lesscommon side effects relevant <strong>to</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clude impairments <strong>in</strong> attention, mental flexibility(executive function<strong>in</strong>g), and memory.The available evidence <strong>in</strong>dicates that impairments <strong>in</strong> cognitive function<strong>in</strong>g can be a side effect ofbeta blockers. However, results from the majority of studies <strong>in</strong>dicate that there is little <strong>in</strong> theway of evidence <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicate that beta blockers negatively impact cognitive performance <strong>in</strong> thegeneral population of beta blocker users.AntipsychoticsResearch suggests that atypical antipsychotic drugs may improve cognitive function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>dividuals with Schizophrenia compared <strong>to</strong> treatment with typical antipsychotics. Nonetheless,the research <strong>in</strong>dicates that even with atypical antipsychotics, <strong>in</strong>dividuals still experience residualcognitive impairments.Non-steroidal anti-<strong>in</strong>flamma<strong>to</strong>riesIn general, the analgesic and anti-<strong>in</strong>flamma<strong>to</strong>ry effects of NSAIDs result <strong>in</strong> improvements <strong>in</strong>functional abilities (e.g., reduction <strong>in</strong> pa<strong>in</strong> and stiffness <strong>in</strong> those with osteoarthritis, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>creased physical function and improvements <strong>in</strong> quality of life). However, there is a suggestionthat the use of NSAIDs can impair cognitive ability.Sedatives and hypnoticsThe adverse effects of sedatives and hypnotics may <strong>in</strong>clude: sedation drows<strong>in</strong>ess cognitive and psychomo<strong>to</strong>r impairment impaired coord<strong>in</strong>ation vertigo362


dizz<strong>in</strong>ess, andblurred or double visionImpairments are greater with higher dosage and with drugs that have a longer half-life.Those us<strong>in</strong>g sedatives and hypnotics are subject <strong>to</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g dependency, addiction and<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>lerance of the effects. Because of this, Health Canada advises that these drugsshould only be used for short periods (e.g. less than 2 months for anxiety; 7 <strong>to</strong> 10 days for<strong>in</strong>somnia). Nonetheless, research <strong>in</strong>dicates that long-term use is not uncommon. Long-termadverse effects of benzodiazep<strong>in</strong>e may <strong>in</strong>clude cognitive decl<strong>in</strong>e, unwanted sedation andimpaired coord<strong>in</strong>ation.Stimulants (for ADHD) and NarcolepsyThere is some <strong>in</strong>dication that stimulants may have a positive effect on driv<strong>in</strong>g performance.However, the effect of stimulant medication on the functional ability of <strong>in</strong>dividuals with ADHDis unclear because of the methodological limitations of research <strong>to</strong> date.ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessment approachPrimary functionalability affectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsUse ofpsychotropicdrugsPersistent Impairment:Functional assessmentCognitive<strong>Drive</strong>r’s MedicalExam<strong>in</strong>ation ReportCognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>olssuch as; MOCA, MMSE,SIMARD-MD, Trails Aor B<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment29.5 CompensationWhile an <strong>in</strong>dividual can’t compensate for the effects of psychotropic drugs, they can take steps <strong>to</strong>mitigate the impact that these drugs may have on their ability <strong>to</strong> drive, such steps <strong>in</strong>clude:1. Adjust dosage2. Not driv<strong>in</strong>g when <strong>in</strong>itiat<strong>in</strong>g therapy3. Tak<strong>in</strong>g medication at different times of day. e.g. bedtime for sedat<strong>in</strong>g medication4. Gett<strong>in</strong>g used <strong>to</strong> the effects (2-4 weeks adjustment period for most medication)5. Chang<strong>in</strong>g medication <strong>to</strong> one with less side effects6. Beware of over the counter medications contribution <strong>to</strong> additive effects7. Lead<strong>in</strong>g a healthy lifestyle. e.g. enough rest, nutrition etc.8. Avoid<strong>in</strong>g concurrent alcohol use363


GUIDELINES29.6 Private and commercial drivers who use psychotropic drugsApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es<strong>Fitness</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMVdeterm<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who are us<strong>in</strong>g psychotropic drugs.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician, or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>dicates possiblepersistent impairment of the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMV will request a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment, unless therehas been no significant change <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s condition orcognitive ability s<strong>in</strong>ce a previous functional assessment.Otherwise, OSMV will not generally request further <strong>in</strong>formation.OSMV will consider the follow<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts when mak<strong>in</strong>g a driverfitness determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> relation <strong>to</strong> the use of drugs: OSMV is primarily concerned with the persistent cognitiveimpairment associated with the effects or side effects ofmedication used for ongo<strong>in</strong>g treatment of medical conditions. Temporary impairments from short-term treatment or changes <strong>in</strong>dosage or type of medication are considered transientimpairments for licens<strong>in</strong>g purposes. In these circumstances, theprescrib<strong>in</strong>g physician should advise patients not <strong>to</strong> drive until theeffect of a drug is known. Where there is evidence of somepersistent cognitive impairment caused by a stable dose,<strong>in</strong>dividuals should be assessed for fitness <strong>to</strong> drive. Where an <strong>in</strong>dividual is tak<strong>in</strong>g multiple drugs (poly-pharmacy),OSMV will consider the potential compound<strong>in</strong>g effects. Whererelevant, OSMV will also consider the potential compound<strong>in</strong>geffect of the use of alcohol or illicit drugs.OSMV may f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividuals fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g does not <strong>in</strong>dicatepossible persistent impairment of the cognitive functionsnecessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, or where the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicatespossible impairment of the cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g, a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicates that they have thefunctional ability required for their class of licence heldNo conditions are required.No restrictions are required.364


Re-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleNo re-assessment, other than rout<strong>in</strong>e commercial or age-related reassessmentis required, unless: the re-assessment guidel<strong>in</strong>es for the underly<strong>in</strong>g condition requirere-assessment the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates non-compliance or mis-use ofpsychotropic drugs, and/or the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates possiblepersistent cognitive impairment.The use of a psychotropic does not mean that an <strong>in</strong>dividual is unfit <strong>to</strong>drive. Where there is some evidence of a persistent cognitiveimpairment associated with the stable use of a drug, an <strong>in</strong>dividualassessment of the effect of the drug is required <strong>to</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>e driverfitness.365


Chapter 30: General Debility and Lack of Stam<strong>in</strong>aBACKGROUND30.1 About general debility and lack of stam<strong>in</strong>aGeneral debilityGeneral debility is a state of general weakness or feebleness that may be a result or an outcomeof one or more medical conditions that produce symp<strong>to</strong>ms such as pa<strong>in</strong>, fatigue, cachexia andphysical disability, or cognitive symp<strong>to</strong>ms of attention, concentration, memory, developmentaland/or learn<strong>in</strong>g deficits.Some of the medical conditions <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this part of the Manual may be commonly associatedwith general debility, e.g. end stage renal disease, and <strong>in</strong> these cases this is noted <strong>in</strong> the medicalcondition chapter. However, general debility is more usually associated with multiple medicalconditions or extreme old age. Medications used <strong>to</strong> treat various medical conditions may alsoproduce effects that contribute <strong>to</strong> general debility.Common medical conditions not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this Manual that may result <strong>in</strong> general debility are: anorexia nervosa or other related eat<strong>in</strong>g disorders chronic fatigue syndrome malabsorption syndromes (e.g. cystic fibrosis, Crohn’s disease) and malnutrition AIDS chronic <strong>in</strong>fections, e.g. TB or HIV malignancies, and conditions result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> chronic pa<strong>in</strong>.Lack of stam<strong>in</strong>aStam<strong>in</strong>a is the physical or mental strength <strong>to</strong> resist fatigue and tiredness and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> functionalability over time. Lack of stam<strong>in</strong>a is not the same as general debility. While drivers withgeneral debility do not have sufficient stam<strong>in</strong>a <strong>to</strong> drive, drivers suffer<strong>in</strong>g from a lack of stam<strong>in</strong>amay not be suffer<strong>in</strong>g from general debility.Generally, concerns about stam<strong>in</strong>a only arise <strong>in</strong> extreme old age or when a driver has a conditionthat results <strong>in</strong> a persistent impairment. For drivers with co-morbidities, stam<strong>in</strong>a may be aparticular concern.Some of the medical conditions <strong>in</strong> this part of the Manual may be commonly associated with alack of stam<strong>in</strong>a, e.g. congestive heart failure, and <strong>in</strong> these cases this is noted <strong>in</strong> the medicalcondition chapter.366


30.2 Effect of general debility and lack of stam<strong>in</strong>a on functional ability <strong>to</strong> driveBoth a lack of stam<strong>in</strong>a and general debility may impair an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s mo<strong>to</strong>r and/or cognitivefunctions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g.A person suffer<strong>in</strong>g from a lack of stam<strong>in</strong>a may experience: fatigue physical disability, and/or cognitive impairment such as loss of attention, concentration and memory.A person suffer<strong>in</strong>g from general debility may experience: pa<strong>in</strong> fatigue / poor stam<strong>in</strong>a cachexia - a condition marked by loss of appetite, weight loss, muscular wast<strong>in</strong>g, andgeneral mental and physical debilitation physical disability, and/or cognitive impairment such as loss of attention, concentration and memory.ConditionType of driv<strong>in</strong>gimpairment andassessmentapproachPrimaryfunctionalability affectedAssessment <strong>to</strong>olsGeneral debilityLack of stam<strong>in</strong>aPersistentImpairment:FunctionalassessmentCognitive<strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ationReportCognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong>ols suchas; MOCA, MMSE, SIMARD-MD, Trails A or B<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessmentMo<strong>to</strong>r<strong>Drive</strong>r’s Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>ationReportIC<strong>BC</strong> road test30.3 CompensationAn <strong>in</strong>dividual cannot compensate for general debility or a lack of stam<strong>in</strong>a that impairs thefunctions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g.367


GUIDELINES30.4 Private and commercial drivers with frailty, weakness or general debilityApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>esThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have frailty, weakness or generaldebility.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that an <strong>in</strong>dividual has generaldebility, OSMV will not generally request additional <strong>in</strong>formation orassessments.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates: frailty reduced reaction time, or weaknessOSMV will request an IC<strong>BC</strong> road test.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician or cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates possibleimpairment of the cognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMVwill request a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment.OSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleIf cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessaryfor driv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.Individuals are not fit <strong>to</strong> drive if: the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates that the <strong>in</strong>dividual has generaldebility, or the results of a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicate that the <strong>in</strong>dividualdoes not have the functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive the types of vehiclesallowed by their class of licence.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess every two years, unless the treat<strong>in</strong>g physicianrecommends annual re-assessment.Frailty, weakness or general debility may <strong>in</strong>clude one or morecognitive, mo<strong>to</strong>r or visual impairment. Decisions about driver fitnessshould be based on an <strong>in</strong>dividual functional assessment.368


30.5 Private and commercial drivers with a lack of stam<strong>in</strong>aApplicationAssessment guidel<strong>in</strong>esOSMV determ<strong>in</strong>ationguidel<strong>in</strong>esConditionsRestrictionsRe-assessmentguidel<strong>in</strong>esPolicy rationaleThese guidel<strong>in</strong>es apply <strong>to</strong> driver fitness determ<strong>in</strong>ations for privateand commercial drivers who have a lack of stam<strong>in</strong>a.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates concerns regard<strong>in</strong>g stam<strong>in</strong>a, OSMVwill request an IC<strong>BC</strong> road test.If the treat<strong>in</strong>g physician <strong>in</strong>dicates possible impairment of thecognitive functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g, OSMV will request a<strong>Drive</strong>ABLE assessment. Because the effects of a lack of stam<strong>in</strong>a oncognitive function may not be evident dur<strong>in</strong>g the course of the shortcognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g tests, OSMV will generally request a <strong>Drive</strong>ABLEassessment of <strong>in</strong>dividuals whose cognitive functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g may be impaired by a lack of stam<strong>in</strong>a, even if the results ofthe cognitive screen show that the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s cognitive function isnot impaired.If cognitive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that the cognitive functions necessaryfor driv<strong>in</strong>g are impaired, OSMV will not request further assessments.Individuals are not fit <strong>to</strong> drive if a functional assessment <strong>in</strong>dicatesdecl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g performance over the course of the assessment, orotherwise <strong>in</strong>dicates that the lack of stam<strong>in</strong>a impairs the <strong>in</strong>dividual’sfunctional ability <strong>to</strong> drive the types of vehicles allowed by their classof licence.No conditions are required.No restrictions are required.OSMV will re-assess every two years, unless the treat<strong>in</strong>g physicianrecommends annual re-assessment.In order <strong>to</strong> be fit <strong>to</strong> drive, an <strong>in</strong>dividual must be able <strong>to</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> asufficient level of functional impairment over time. Decisions aboutdriver fitness should be based on an <strong>in</strong>dividual functional assessment.369


PART 4:APPENDICES370


Appendix 1: Glossary of TermsCommercial driverCo-morbiditiesCompensationConditionCredible reportmeans a driver with: a class 1, 2, 3 or 4 licence, or a class 5 licence with endorsement 18, 19 or 20.means medical conditions that exist at the same time as theprimary condition <strong>in</strong> the same patient, for example, hypertension isa co-morbidity of many conditions such as diabetes, ischemic heartdisease and end-stage renal disease. The medical conditionchapters <strong>in</strong> part 3 of this Manual <strong>in</strong>dicate any co-morbiditiescommonly associated with each medical condition.is the use of strategies or devices by a driver with a persistentimpairment <strong>to</strong> compensate for the functional impairment caused bya medical condition. Treatment for a condition, e.g. medication, isnot a type of compensation. Where available or known, possiblecompensation strategies for each medical condition are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong>the medical condition chapters <strong>in</strong> part 3 of this Manual.means a condition that is imposed on an <strong>in</strong>dividual by OSMV.Unlike restrictions, which are placed on a licence and enforceableat roadside, conditions are placed on a driver and are notenforceable at roadside. Examples of conditions are ‘do not driveif your blood sugar drops below 4mmol/L,’ or ‘do not drive if yourdialysis treatment is delayed.’means an unsolicited report from:a health care professionalthe policeIC<strong>BC</strong> front-l<strong>in</strong>e staffa government agenta family member, ora concerned member of the publicthat provides objective <strong>in</strong>formation about a driver’s functionalability <strong>to</strong> drive.371


Driv<strong>in</strong>g recordEpisodic impairmentFit <strong>to</strong> driveFunctional assessment<strong>in</strong>cludes:the length of time an <strong>in</strong>dividual has been licenseddriv<strong>in</strong>g offencesdriv<strong>in</strong>g sanctions appliedcurrent and past licence restriction(s)mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle related Crim<strong>in</strong>al Code convictionscrash his<strong>to</strong>ry, andpast road test results.is the result of a medical condition that does not have any ongo<strong>in</strong>gmeasurable, testable or observable impact on the functional ability<strong>to</strong> drive but that may result <strong>in</strong> an unpredictable sudden or episodicimpairment of the functions needed for driv<strong>in</strong>g.For example, the medical condition that gives rise <strong>to</strong> theimpairment may be testable, e.g. the size of an abdom<strong>in</strong>al aorticaneurysm, or known, e.g. epilepsy, but the precipitat<strong>in</strong>g event thatnegatively impacts the functional ability <strong>to</strong> drive, e.g. the ruptureof the aneurysm or an epileptic seizure, is not predictable. Thesource of the potential impairment is known and the <strong>in</strong>evitability offunctional impairment is known <strong>in</strong> the event that the episodicimpairment occurs, but when it will occur is not known.means that an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s mo<strong>to</strong>r, sensory and cognitive functionsare sufficient <strong>to</strong> drive safelyis any k<strong>in</strong>d of assessment that <strong>in</strong>volves direct observation ormeasurement of the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g. Functionalassessments <strong>in</strong>clude:paper-pencil testscomputer-based testseye testshear<strong>in</strong>g testsdriver rehabilitation specialist assessments, androad tests.372


Medical assessmentis any k<strong>in</strong>d of assessment that provides <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an<strong>in</strong>dividual’s medical condition and/or their response <strong>to</strong>, orcompliance with, treatment. This <strong>in</strong>cludes assessments such asultrasounds, blood tests and other medical tests that are notrequested by OSMV, but are often submitted by physicians andprovide useful <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s medicalcondition.Medical condition is any <strong>in</strong>jury, illness, disease or disorder that is identified <strong>in</strong> Part 3of this Manual or that may impair the functions necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g. For purposes of the <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Program, impairmentresult<strong>in</strong>g from medications and/or treatment regimes that havebeen prescribed as treatment for a medical condition is alsoconsidered a medical condition. General debility and a lack ofstam<strong>in</strong>a are also considered as medical conditions that may impairthe functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g.IncidenceInsightmeans the annual number of new cases of a medical condition.means that a driver:is aware of their medical conditionunderstands how the condition may impair their functionalability <strong>to</strong> drive, andhas the judgment and will<strong>in</strong>gness <strong>to</strong> comply with theirtreatment regime and any conditions or restrictions imposed byOSMV.Physicians will often use terms such as “impaired awareness,”“decreased metacognitition,” or “lack of awareness regard<strong>in</strong>gdeficits” on a medical assessment <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicate that an <strong>in</strong>dividuallacks <strong>in</strong>sight.An <strong>in</strong>dividual’s level of <strong>in</strong>sight is a critical consideration whenassess<strong>in</strong>g the risk of an episodic impairment of functional abilitydue <strong>to</strong> a psychiatric disorder. Because of this, there is a specificguidel<strong>in</strong>e regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong> the Psychiatric Disorders chapter.373


Persistent impairmentPrevalencePrivate driverRe-assessmentRestrictionSudden <strong>in</strong>capacitationis an ongo<strong>in</strong>g or cont<strong>in</strong>uous impairment <strong>to</strong> a function necessary fordriv<strong>in</strong>g. The potential impacts of persistent impairments on thefunctions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g are generally measurable, testableand observable. Although the condition may be progressive, theprogression is usually slow and sudden deterioration is unlikely.Persistent impairments may be stable, e.g. loss of leg, orprogressive, e.g. arthritis.means the global occurrence of a medical condition.means a driver with a class 5, 6, 7 or 8 licence.is the process of screen<strong>in</strong>g, assessment and determ<strong>in</strong>ation for an<strong>in</strong>dividual with a previously reported medical condition. Reassessmentis <strong>in</strong>itiated when a request for a driver’s medicalexam<strong>in</strong>ation or an EVF is sent <strong>to</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual at the expiration ofan OSMV-scheduled re-assessment <strong>in</strong>terval.means a restriction that is pr<strong>in</strong>ted on a driver’s licence and isenforceable at the roadside through f<strong>in</strong>es. Non-compliance with arestriction is an offence.Restrictions are commonly used for impairments where a drivercan compensate. However, on occasion they may be used forimpairments for which a driver cannot compensate. Examples ofrestrictions where a driver can compensate for their persistentimpairment are ‘wear corrective lenses’, ‘must only drive modifiedvehicle with steer<strong>in</strong>g knob’ and ‘use oversized mirrors.’ Arestriction where a driver cannot compensate would be ‘do notdrive at night’ for persistent night bl<strong>in</strong>dness.means the sudden loss of the functions necessary for driv<strong>in</strong>g. Itmay be the result of a <strong>to</strong>tal or partial loss of consciousness,narcolepsy, overwhelm<strong>in</strong>g pa<strong>in</strong>, seizures or other episodic events.374


Transient impairmentmeans a temporary impairment of the functional ability <strong>to</strong> drivewhere there is little or no likelihood of a recurr<strong>in</strong>g episodic, orongo<strong>in</strong>g persistent, impairment. Examples of transientimpairments are:the after-effects of surgery, e.g. the time <strong>to</strong> recover from theanesthetic and the surgery itselffractures and casts, post-orthopedic surgeryconcussioneye surgery, e.g. cataract surgeryuse of orthopaedic braces (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g neck), andcardiac <strong>in</strong>flammation and <strong>in</strong>fections.375


Appendix 2: Excerpts from the MVAMo<strong>to</strong>r Vehicle Act[RS<strong>BC</strong> 1996] CHAPTER 318Application for licence25 (3) For the purpose of determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g an applicant's driv<strong>in</strong>g experience,driv<strong>in</strong>g skills, qualifications, fitness and ability <strong>to</strong> drive and operate anycategory of mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle designated for that class of driver's licencefor which the application is made, the applicant must(a) submit <strong>to</strong> one or more, as the Insurance Corporation ofBritish Columbia may specify, of the follow<strong>in</strong>g: a knowledgetest; a road test; a road signs and signals test,(b) submit <strong>to</strong> one or more, as the super<strong>in</strong>tendent mayspecify, of the follow<strong>in</strong>g: a vision test; medicalexam<strong>in</strong>ations; other exam<strong>in</strong>ations or tests, other than asset out <strong>in</strong> paragraph (a),(b.1) provide the corporation with <strong>in</strong>formation required <strong>to</strong>measure the applicant's driv<strong>in</strong>g experience, driv<strong>in</strong>g skillsand qualifications,(c) provide the super<strong>in</strong>tendent with other <strong>in</strong>formation he orshe considers necessary <strong>to</strong> allow the super<strong>in</strong>tendent <strong>to</strong>carry out his or her powers, duties and functions,(d) submit <strong>to</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g his or her picture taken, and(e) if required by or on behalf of the corporation, identifyhimself or herself <strong>to</strong> the corporation's satisfaction.(7) On receipt, <strong>in</strong> the respective forms required under subsection (1),of the application and the evaluation, and on be<strong>in</strong>g satisfied of thetruth of the facts stated <strong>in</strong> the application, and that the prescribed feesand premium for the driver’s certificate have been paid, and, subject<strong>to</strong> subsection (9), on be<strong>in</strong>g satisfied as <strong>to</strong> the driv<strong>in</strong>g experience,driv<strong>in</strong>g skills, qualifications, fitness and ability of the applicant <strong>to</strong> driveand operate mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicles of the relevant category, the corporation376


must cause <strong>to</strong> be issued <strong>to</strong> the applicant a numbered driver's licence <strong>in</strong>the form established by the corporation authoriz<strong>in</strong>g the applicant <strong>to</strong>drive or operate a mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle of the category designated for theclass of licence applied for and a driver’s certificate.(9) In issu<strong>in</strong>g any driver's licence or driver's certificate, thecorporation, for those aspects of fitness and ability exam<strong>in</strong>ed, testedor reviewed by the super<strong>in</strong>tendent, must abide by the super<strong>in</strong>tendent's<strong>in</strong>structions.(12) Despite the regulations, the super<strong>in</strong>tendent may require astatement <strong>in</strong>, endorsement on, or attachment <strong>to</strong> any person's driver'slicence(a) restrict<strong>in</strong>g the hours of the day and the days of theweek dur<strong>in</strong>g which the person may drive a mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle,(b) restrict<strong>in</strong>g the area <strong>in</strong> which the person may drive amo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle,(c) restrict<strong>in</strong>g the mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle or class of mo<strong>to</strong>r vehiclethat the person may drive,(d) restrict<strong>in</strong>g the number of passengers that the personmay carry <strong>in</strong> a mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle driven by the person, and(e) impos<strong>in</strong>g other restrictions on or add<strong>in</strong>g any conditions<strong>to</strong> the driver's licence of the person that the super<strong>in</strong>tendentconsiders necessary for the operation of a mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle bythe person.(13) The Insurance Corporation of British Columbia must ensure that aperson's driver's licence reflects any restrictions and conditionsimposed <strong>in</strong> respect of that licence by means of the appropriatestatement <strong>in</strong>, endorsement on or attachment <strong>to</strong> that licence, <strong>in</strong>accordance with the requirements of the super<strong>in</strong>tendent.(15) A person who violates a requirement, restriction or conditionprescribed under this section <strong>in</strong> respect of the person's driver's licenceor who violates a restriction or condition stated <strong>in</strong>, endorsed on orattached <strong>to</strong> a driver's licence issued <strong>to</strong> the person under this sectioncommits an offence.377


Exam<strong>in</strong>ation of licensees29 The super<strong>in</strong>tendent may require a person <strong>to</strong> whom a driver's licencehas been issued <strong>to</strong> attend at a time and place for one or both of thefollow<strong>in</strong>g purposes:(a) <strong>to</strong> submit <strong>to</strong> one or more of the follow<strong>in</strong>g tests, <strong>to</strong> beconducted by the Insurance Corporation of BritishColumbia: a knowledge test; a road test; a road signs andsignals test;(b) <strong>to</strong> be otherwise exam<strong>in</strong>ed as <strong>to</strong> the person's fitness andability <strong>to</strong> drive and operate mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicles of the categoryfor which he or she is licensed.Prohibition aga<strong>in</strong>st driv<strong>in</strong>g relat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> fitness or ability <strong>to</strong> drive92 If(a) a person has been required under section 29 <strong>to</strong> submit<strong>to</strong> an exam<strong>in</strong>ation and he or she(i) fails <strong>to</strong> appear and submit <strong>to</strong> the exam<strong>in</strong>ation, or(ii) fails <strong>to</strong> pay the prescribed exam<strong>in</strong>ation fee,(b) the super<strong>in</strong>tendent considers that a person is unable orunfit <strong>to</strong> drive a mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle or <strong>to</strong> hold a driver's licence ofa certa<strong>in</strong> class,(b.1) a person fails <strong>to</strong> comply with a condition imposed onhis or her driver's licence under section 25.1 (2), or(b.2) a person fails <strong>to</strong> attend or participate <strong>in</strong> and completea program referred <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong> section 233 <strong>to</strong> the satisfaction ofthe super<strong>in</strong>tendent as required by the super<strong>in</strong>tendent,then, with or without a hear<strong>in</strong>g and even though the person is or maybe subject <strong>to</strong> another prohibition from driv<strong>in</strong>g, the super<strong>in</strong>tendent may(c) prohibit the person from driv<strong>in</strong>g a mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle, or(d) direct the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia <strong>to</strong>(i) cancel the person's driver's licence and <strong>to</strong> issue adifferent class of driver's licence <strong>to</strong> the person, or378


(ii) cancel the person's driver's licence withoutissu<strong>in</strong>g a different class of driver's licence <strong>to</strong> theperson.Super<strong>in</strong>tendent may delegate117 (1) The super<strong>in</strong>tendent may delegate any or all of the powers, dutiesand functions of the super<strong>in</strong>tendent(a) under this Act <strong>to</strong> persons appo<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> accordance withsection 118 (2), or(b) under this Act, except Part 2.1, <strong>to</strong> the InsuranceCorporation of British Columbia.(2) The Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, <strong>in</strong> carry<strong>in</strong>g outpowers or responsibilities delegated <strong>to</strong> it under subsection (1), mustact <strong>in</strong> accordance with any directives issued by the super<strong>in</strong>tendent.(3) For the purposes of subsection (2), the super<strong>in</strong>tendent may issuegeneral or specific directives.Report of psychologist, op<strong>to</strong>metrist and medical practitioner230 (1) This section applies <strong>to</strong> every legally qualified and registeredpsychologist, op<strong>to</strong>metrist and medical practitioner who has a patient16 years of age or older who(a) <strong>in</strong> the op<strong>in</strong>ion of the psychologist, op<strong>to</strong>metrist ormedical practitioner has a medical condition that makes itdangerous <strong>to</strong> the patient or <strong>to</strong> the public for the patient <strong>to</strong>drive a mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle, and(b) cont<strong>in</strong>ues <strong>to</strong> drive a mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle after be<strong>in</strong>g warned ofthe danger by the psychologist, op<strong>to</strong>metrist or medicalpractitioner.(2) Every psychologist, op<strong>to</strong>metrist and medical practitioner referred<strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong> subsection (1) must report <strong>to</strong> the super<strong>in</strong>tendent the name,address and medical condition of a patient referred <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>subsection (1).379


(3) No action for damages lies or may be brought aga<strong>in</strong>st apsychologist, an op<strong>to</strong>metrist or a medical practitioner for mak<strong>in</strong>g areport under this section, unless the psychologist, op<strong>to</strong>metrist ormedical practitioner made the report falsely and maliciously.380


Appendix 3: Ag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Drive</strong>rsAbout ag<strong>in</strong>g driversAs with the general population <strong>in</strong> Canada, the driv<strong>in</strong>g population is ag<strong>in</strong>g.The functional decl<strong>in</strong>es associated with ag<strong>in</strong>g are well documented. Thesefunctional decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> healthy ag<strong>in</strong>g drivers are unlikely <strong>to</strong> lead <strong>to</strong> unsafedecl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g performance, except <strong>in</strong> the case of extreme old age.However, ag<strong>in</strong>g is also associated with <strong>in</strong>creased risk for a broad range ofmedical conditions, such as visual impairments, musculoskeletal disorders,cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cognitive impairment and dementia.These medical conditions and medications used <strong>to</strong> treat them may affectfitness <strong>to</strong> drive.Although there are many age-associated medical conditions that mayaffect driv<strong>in</strong>g, there is a particularly strong association between cognitiveimpairment and dementia and impaired driv<strong>in</strong>g performance. A large,national population-based study done <strong>in</strong> Canada <strong>in</strong> 1991 showed that 25%of the population 65 and older have some form of cognitive impairment ordementia, ris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> 70% for those 85 and older.Prevalence of Cognitive Impairment0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70%65-7475-8485+Alzheimer’s Disease and Other DementiaCognitive ImpairmentDemographicsThe number of people <strong>in</strong> Canada over the age of 65 <strong>in</strong>creased from 3.5million <strong>in</strong> 1996 <strong>to</strong> 4.2 million <strong>in</strong> 2006. By 2051, it is projected <strong>to</strong> be morethan 9 million.381


Percent Hold<strong>in</strong>g LicensesMillionsMillionsPopulation ChangeAges 15 - 64Ages 65+24109238227621542031921181996 2000 2006 2016 2026 2036 205101996 2000 2006 2016 2026 2036 2051YearYearSource: Statistics Canada, 2002These <strong>in</strong>creases are reflected <strong>in</strong> the driv<strong>in</strong>g population, with thepercentage of drivers who are older <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g over time. Increases <strong>in</strong> thepercentage of older women who have a driver’s licence will also have animpact. Currently, 50% of females over the age of 65 are licensed <strong>to</strong>drive; <strong>in</strong> 2031 it is projected <strong>to</strong> be 85%.100806040MalesFemales2001950 1984 1997Source: Rosenbloom, 1998Ag<strong>in</strong>g and multiple medical conditionsBecause of the association between age and many chronic medicalconditions, ag<strong>in</strong>g drivers are more likely <strong>to</strong> have one or more of theseconditions. A 2003 survey found that 33% of Canadians age 65 and olderhad 3 or more chronic medical conditions, compared with 12% of younger382


Percentadults. The survey also found that the average number of chronicconditions <strong>in</strong>creases with age.706050Number of chronic diseases (0 <strong>to</strong> 2 or more)reported by age403020012 or more10020-39 40-59 60-79 80+AgeSource: Rapoport, Jacobs, Bell & Klarenbach (2004)With an <strong>in</strong>creased rate of multiple medical conditions, there is also agreater likelihood that ag<strong>in</strong>g drivers will be tak<strong>in</strong>g multiple medications(polypharmacy). With each additional medication taken, there is an<strong>in</strong>creased risk of side effects and adverse <strong>in</strong>teractions betweenmedications, which may affect fitness <strong>to</strong> drive. While <strong>in</strong> many cases theadverse effects may be temporary or avoidable, where specificmedications or dosages are required there may be a persistent impairmen<strong>to</strong>f the functions needed for driv<strong>in</strong>g.Ag<strong>in</strong>g and adverse driv<strong>in</strong>g outcomesAs a group, older drivers are less likely <strong>to</strong> be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> a crash thanother age groups. However, the reason for this is that older drivers spendless time driv<strong>in</strong>g than others. When driv<strong>in</strong>g exposure is considered, olderdrivers show an <strong>in</strong>creased crash risk, an <strong>in</strong>creased risk for at-fault crash,and an <strong>in</strong>creased risk of be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>jured and dy<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a crash.Statistics from IC<strong>BC</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicate that older drivers are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> adisproportionate number of at-fault crashes. The chart below shows theratio of at-fault (50% liable) <strong>to</strong> not-at-fault crashes for different agegroups. <strong>Drive</strong>rs between the ages of 16 and 20 have more than 1.5 timesthe average at-fault versus not-at-fault crashes. <strong>Drive</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> the 30 <strong>to</strong> 65 agegroup have a lower-than-average at-fault crash ratio. At about age 70, the383


Fatality Rateratio of at-fault crashes beg<strong>in</strong>s <strong>to</strong> rise, climb<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> 2.5 for drivers who are81 and older.Source: Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, Issues Concern<strong>in</strong>g the Safety of Older <strong>Drive</strong>rs, 2002An exam<strong>in</strong>ation of driver fatality rates, adjusted for driv<strong>in</strong>g exposure,<strong>in</strong>dicates that there are two high risk age groups: ages 16 <strong>to</strong> 19 and 65 andolder. Older drivers are also more likely <strong>to</strong> be <strong>in</strong>jured <strong>in</strong> a crash and <strong>to</strong><strong>in</strong>cur more severe <strong>in</strong>juries than younger drivers. The higher <strong>in</strong>jury andfatality rates of older drivers is, <strong>in</strong> part, attributable <strong>to</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creasedsusceptibility of older people <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>jury and death.Unlike younger driver crashes, most traffic fatalities <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g olderdrivers occur dur<strong>in</strong>g the day time, on week-days, and <strong>in</strong> safe roadconditions, with the majority of the crashes <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g another vehicle.<strong>Drive</strong>r Fatality Rate (per 100 million VMT)10987654321016 17 18 19 20-2425-2930-3435-3940-4445-4950-5455-5960-6465-6970-7475-7980- 85+84Source: FARS 2001 and NHTSA 2001<strong>Drive</strong>r Age Group384


Appendix 4: Licence ClassesThe table below describes the classes of B.C. driver licences.ClassClass 1Class 2Typical VehiclesSemi-trailer trucks and all other mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicles orcomb<strong>in</strong>ations of vehicles except mo<strong>to</strong>rcycles Buses, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g school buses, special activity busesand special vehicles Trailers or <strong>to</strong>wed vehicles may not exceed 4,600kilograms except if the bus and trailers or <strong>to</strong>wedvehicles do not have air brakes Any mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle or comb<strong>in</strong>ation of vehicles <strong>in</strong> Class4Class 3Class 4(unrestricted)Class 4Trucks with more than two axles, such as dump trucksand large <strong>to</strong>w trucks, but not <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a bus that isbe<strong>in</strong>g used <strong>to</strong> transport passengersTrailers may not exceed 4,600 kilograms except if thetruck and trailers do not have air brakesA <strong>to</strong>w car <strong>to</strong>w<strong>in</strong>g a vehicle of any weightA mobile truck craneAny mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle or comb<strong>in</strong>ation of vehicles <strong>in</strong> Class5Buses with a maximum seat<strong>in</strong>g capacity of 25 persons(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the driver), <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g school buses, specialactivity buses and special vehicles used <strong>to</strong> transportpeople with disabilitiesTaxis and limous<strong>in</strong>esAmbulancesAny mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle or comb<strong>in</strong>ation of vehicles <strong>in</strong> Class5Taxis and limous<strong>in</strong>es (up <strong>to</strong> 10 persons <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g thedriver)AmbulancesSpecial vehicles with a seat<strong>in</strong>g capacity of not more385


Class(restricted)Typical Vehiclesthan 10 persons (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the driver) used <strong>to</strong> transportpeople with disabilitiesAny mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle or comb<strong>in</strong>ation of vehicles <strong>in</strong> Class5Class 5 or 7 Two axle vehicles <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cars, vans, trucks and <strong>to</strong>wtrucks Trailers or <strong>to</strong>wed vehicles may not exceed 4,600kilograms Mo<strong>to</strong>r homes (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g those with more than twoaxles) Limited speed mo<strong>to</strong>rcycles and all-terra<strong>in</strong> vehicles(ATVs) Passenger vehicles used as school buses with seat<strong>in</strong>gcapacity of not more than 10 persons (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g thedriver)Construction vehiclesThree-wheeled vehicles - does not <strong>in</strong>clude threewheeledmo<strong>to</strong>rcycles (trikes) or mo<strong>to</strong>rcycle/sidecarcomb<strong>in</strong>ationsDoes not <strong>in</strong>clude Class 4 vehicles or mo<strong>to</strong>rcyclesMo<strong>to</strong>rcycles, all-terra<strong>in</strong> cycles, all-terra<strong>in</strong> vehicles(ATVs)Class 6 or 8Class 4 or 5 with heavytrailer endorsement(code 20)Trailers or <strong>to</strong>wed vehicles exceed<strong>in</strong>g 4,600 kilogramsprovided neither the truck nor trailer has air brakesAny mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle or comb<strong>in</strong>ation of vehicles <strong>in</strong> Class5Class 4 or 5 with housetrailer endorsement(code 51) Recreational (house) trailers exceed<strong>in</strong>g 4,600kilograms provided neither the truck nor trailer has airbrakes Any mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle or comb<strong>in</strong>ation of vehicles <strong>in</strong> Class5386


Appendix 5: Draft<strong>in</strong>g and Approval ProcessEach medical condition chapter was drafted us<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g process:1. Dr. Bonnie Dobbs, University of Alberta provided updated researchregard<strong>in</strong>g the medical condition and driv<strong>in</strong>g.2. The chapter was revised by OSMV based on Dr. Dobbs’ research aswell as a review of the Canadian Medical Association’s (CMA)Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>Fitness</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Drive</strong> – A <strong>Guide</strong> for Physicians, and the CanadianCouncil of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Transport Adm<strong>in</strong>istra<strong>to</strong>rs (CCMTA) National SafetyCode (NSC).3. Specifically identified subject matter experts reviewed the draft chapterand provided feedback for revisions.4. The draft was published on the <strong>BC</strong>MA web site for review byphysicians and on drivesafe.com for review by stakeholders and thebroader road safety community.5. The chapter was further revised and ultimately approved by OSMV andthe <strong>BC</strong>MA.387


Appendix 6:The Relationship between <strong>BC</strong> <strong>Drive</strong>r <strong>Fitness</strong> Policyand Policy <strong>in</strong> Other JurisdictionsThe relationship between <strong>BC</strong> driver fitness policy and the CanadianCouncil of Mo<strong>to</strong>r Transport Adm<strong>in</strong>istra<strong>to</strong>rs (CCMTA) Medical Standardsfor <strong>Drive</strong>rsAll Canadian prov<strong>in</strong>ces and terri<strong>to</strong>ries have the authority <strong>to</strong> establish theirown driver fitness policies. In order <strong>to</strong> support a consistent approach <strong>to</strong>driver fitness across the country, CCMTA publishes the MedicalStandards for <strong>Drive</strong>rs (formerly called the National Safety Code).The CCMTA Medical Standards are developed by medical advisors andadm<strong>in</strong>istra<strong>to</strong>rs from Canadian prov<strong>in</strong>cial driver licens<strong>in</strong>g bodies. Thestandards are <strong>in</strong>tended as a guide <strong>in</strong> establish<strong>in</strong>g basic m<strong>in</strong>imum medicalqualifications <strong>to</strong> drive for both private and commercial drivers and are<strong>in</strong>tended for use by both physicians and regula<strong>to</strong>rs.Although no jurisdiction <strong>in</strong> Canada is required <strong>to</strong> adopt the CCMTAMedical Standards, the majority are adopted by the prov<strong>in</strong>cial andterri<strong>to</strong>rial mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicle licens<strong>in</strong>g departments. This achieves a uniformityof standards across Canada.The relationship between <strong>BC</strong> driver fitness policy for commercial drivers,the CCMTA Medical Standards and the North American Free TradeAgreementUnder the North American Free Trade Agreement, the United States andCanada reached agreement on reciprocity of the medical fitnessrequirements for drivers of commercial mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicles effective March 30,1999. The countries determ<strong>in</strong>ed that the medical provisions of U.S.Federal Mo<strong>to</strong>r Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) and - what was then- the Canadian National Safety Code (NSC) are equivalent.The exception however is that Canadian drivers who are <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>-treateddiabetics, who are hear<strong>in</strong>g-impaired, or who have epilepsy are not bepermitted <strong>to</strong> operate commercial mo<strong>to</strong>r vehicles (CMVs) <strong>in</strong> the UnitedStates. U.S. regulations prohibit <strong>in</strong>dividuals with those conditions fromoperat<strong>in</strong>g CMVs <strong>in</strong> the United States. They are allowed <strong>to</strong> drivecommercial vehicles <strong>in</strong> Canada.Because the reciprocal agreement between the United States and Canadaidentifies the CCMTA Medical Standards as the standard for commercial388


drivers, this means that <strong>BC</strong> commercial drivers must meet or exceed theCCMTA Medical Standards if they drive <strong>in</strong> the United States.The driver fitness guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> this manual for commercial drivers whoare <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>-treated diabetics, hear<strong>in</strong>g-impaired, or who have epilepsyclearly state where the <strong>BC</strong> guidel<strong>in</strong>es are different from the CCMTAMedical Standards for <strong>Drive</strong>rs and the U.S. Federal Mo<strong>to</strong>r Carrier SafetyRegulations (FMCSRs) and the implication for <strong>BC</strong> commercial driverswith these conditions who want <strong>to</strong> drive <strong>in</strong> the U.S.389

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!