13.07.2015 Views

A Grammar of the English Tongue - ESL Teachers Board

A Grammar of the English Tongue - ESL Teachers Board

A Grammar of the English Tongue - ESL Teachers Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A <strong>Grammar</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>English</strong> <strong>Tongue</strong> 57grosser bud; sprig, <strong>of</strong> a slenderer sound, denotes a smaller shoot. In likemanner, from str <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> verb strive, and out, comes strout, and strut. From<strong>the</strong> same str, and <strong>the</strong> termination uggle, is made struggle; and this glimports, but without any great noise, by reason <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> obscure sound <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>vowel u. In like manner, from throw and roll is made troll, and almost in<strong>the</strong> same sense is trundle, from throw or thrust, and rundle. Thus graff orgrough is compounded <strong>of</strong> grave and rough; and trudge from tread or trot,and drudge.In <strong>the</strong>se observations it is easy to discover great sagacity and greatextravagance, an ability to do much defeated by <strong>the</strong> desire <strong>of</strong> doing morethan enough. It may be remarked,1. That Wallis's derivations are <strong>of</strong>ten so made, that by <strong>the</strong> same license anylanguage may be deduced from any o<strong>the</strong>r.2. That he makes no distinction between words immediately derived by usfrom <strong>the</strong> Latin, and those which being copied from o<strong>the</strong>r languages, can<strong>the</strong>refore afford no example <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> genius <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>English</strong> language, or itslaws <strong>of</strong> derivation.3. That he derives from <strong>the</strong> Latin, <strong>of</strong>ten with great harshness and violence,words apparently Teutonick; and <strong>the</strong>refore, according to his owndeclaration, probably older than <strong>the</strong> tongue to which he refers <strong>the</strong>m.4. That some <strong>of</strong> his derivations are apparently erroneous.* * * * *SYNTAX.The established practice <strong>of</strong> grammarians requires that I should here treat <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Syntax; but our language has so little inflection, or variety <strong>of</strong>terminations, that its construction nei<strong>the</strong>r requires nor admits many rules.Wallis, <strong>the</strong>refore, has totally neglected it; and Jonson, whose desire <strong>of</strong>following <strong>the</strong> writers upon <strong>the</strong> learned languages made him think a syntax

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!