13.07.2015 Views

E3_EDT_Phase2_Methodology_and_Sensitivities_2011-04-22

E3_EDT_Phase2_Methodology_and_Sensitivities_2011-04-22

E3_EDT_Phase2_Methodology_and_Sensitivities_2011-04-22

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Anticipated Impact of RevisedPhase 2 Assumptions on ResultsFactor1. Ph.2 Benchmark case will use hurdlerates between a 24 of smaller zones,rather than the 13 Ph. 1 zones.2. Ph.2 EIM Case will not allow full sharingof reserves across EIM footprint3. Ph.2 will add new flexibility reserverequirements by BA to meet changingrenewable generation <strong>and</strong> loads, <strong>and</strong> willallow EIM-wide sharing to satisfy needs.4. Ph.2 will seek to use day ahead forecastof wind generation in unit commitmentcycle to account for effect of uncertainty5. Ph.2 will seek to use HTC-based hydrodispatch but will not change PLF to followEIM-wide footprint6. Ph.2 will not change hurdle rates in unitcommitment cycle of EIM case, onlydispatch (except for Gas CTs)Impacton EIMBenefitsPositiveMediumNegativeHighPositiveMediumPositiveLowPositiveLowNegativeLowDiscussionMore hurdle rates betweenzones will reflect more basecase friction which EIM couldaddressFewer savings from reducedunit commitment & startupEIM will allow for lower totalflexibility reserve needs,partially offsetting reservesharing issue in row aboveMay cause potential loadcurtailment & EIMimprovementHydro will become partiallyprice responsive, <strong>and</strong> mayreshape based on EIM pricesAdditional generators will notcommit for export under EIM24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!